Central European Business Review 2024, 13(2):89-115 | DOI: 10.18267/j.cebr.344

Negative Determinants of CSR�Support by Generation Z in Central Europe: Gender-Sensitive Impacts of Infodemic in 'COVID-19' Era

Martin H�la ORCID...1, Radka MacGregor Pelik�nov� ORCID...2, Filip Rub��ek ORCID...3
1 Metropolitan University Prague, Department of International Business, Prague, Czech Republic, [email protected]
2 Metropolitan University Prague, Department of Financial Management, Prague, Czech Republic, [email protected] (corresponding author)
3 Metropolitan University Prague, Department of Tourism, Prague, Czech Republic, [email protected]

The success of sustainability and corporate social responsibility (CSR) depends upon the active support of all stakeholders. Thus, it is highly relevant and becomes the goal of this paper to perform a pilot case study of the negative determinants of readiness of the new Central European generation of financially sufficiently strong consumers to support CSR, in particular, to answer two research questions: (i) which is the prevailing determinant and (ii) whether it is gender-sensitive. Therefore, 53 male and 53 female Generation Z students from a private university in Prague, ready to pay a CSR bonus, were surveyed in the summer of 2021 regarding the negative determinants of their decisions. The collected answers were statistically processed via cross-tabulation and chi-squared test measures, and the dependence between negative determinants and genders was considered to answer both research questions. The data analysis implies four prevailing negative determinants, two of them related to the infodemic, represented differently by male and female members of Generation Z. This leads to propositions linked to prior studies and advancing them in a new direction. Namely, this indicative pilot case study suggests that Generation Z's readiness to support CSR by paying a CSR bonus is eroded by the infodemic and that male members of Generation Z are more sensitive in this respect than female members.
Implications for Central European audience: This article targets the underestimated issue of factors deterring committed young consumers from their support to sustainability via their readiness to pay a CSR bonus. It empirically points out the relevance of proper information and the negative and gender-sensitive impacts of the infodemic. Theoretical implications include a pioneering contribution to the conceptual appreciation, methodological processing and assessment of particular aspects of infodemic and negative CSR determinants for an emerging cohort of Central European consumers. Practical implications include the dramatic importance of enhancement of awareness and practical suggestions regarding how to inform these male and female consumers and engage them in sustainability and CSR.

Keywords: Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR); COVID-19; Generation Z; infodemic; sustainability
JEL classification: D12, L15, M14, M31

Received: April 8, 2023; Revised: May 28, 2023; Accepted: June 22, 2023; Prepublished online: October 21, 2023; Published: May 30, 2024  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
H�la, M., MacGregor Pelik�nov�, R., & Rub��ek, F. (2024). Negative Determinants of CSR�Support by Generation Z in Central Europe: Gender-Sensitive Impacts of Infodemic in 'COVID-19' Era. Central European Business Review,�13(2),�89-115. doi:�10.18267/j.cebr.344
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Agrawal, D.K. (2022). Determining behavioural differences of Y and Z generational cohorts in online hopping. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 50(7), 880-895. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJRDM-12-2020-0527. Go to original source...
    2. Allaverdi, D. & Browning, T.R. (2020). A methodology for identifying flexible design opportunities in large-scale systems. Systems Engineering, 23(5), 534-556. https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.21548. Go to original source...
    3. Aleknevi�ienė, V., & Bendoraitytė, A. (2023). The Role of Green Finance in Greening the Economy: Conceptual Approach. Central European Business Review, 12(2), 105-130. https://doi.org/10.18267/j.cebr.317. Go to original source...
    4. Allen, E. & Seaman, Ch. (2007). Likert scales and data analyses. Quality Progress, 40(7), 64-65. https://doi.org/10.12691/ajnr-1-1-1. Go to original source...
    5. Alvarez-Galvez, J., Suarez-Lledo, V. & Rojas-Garcia, A. (2021). Determinants of Infodemics During Disease Outbreaks: A Systematic Review. Frontiers in Public Health, 9, 603603. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh. 2021.603603. Go to original source...
    6. Areeda, P. E. (1996). The Socratic method. Harvard Law Review, 109(5), 911-922.
    7. Ashford, N.A., Hall, R.P., Arango-Quiroga, J., Metaxas, K. A., & Showwalter, A. L. (2020). Addressing Inequality: The First Step Beyond COVID-19 and Towards Sustainability. Sustainability, 12(13), 5404. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12135404. Go to original source...
    8. Azimi, S., Andonova, Y. & Schewe, C. (2022). Closer together or further apart? Values of hero generations Y and Z during crisis. Young Consumers, 23(2), 179-196. https://doi.org/10.1108/YC-03-2021-1300. Go to original source...
    9. Balcerzak, A.P., & MacGregor Pelik�nov�, R. (2020). Projection of SDGs in Codes of Ethics - Case study about Lost in Translation? Administrative Sciences, 10(4), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci10040095. Go to original source...
    10. Balcerzak, A.P., MacGregor, R. K., MacGregor Pelik�nov�, R., Rogalska, E., & Szostek, D. (2023). The EU regulation of sustainable investment: The end of sustainability trade-offs?. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 11(1): 199-212. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2023.110111. Go to original source...
    11. Bansal, P. & Song, H.C. (2017). Similar But Not the Same: Differentiating Corporate Sustainability from Corporate Responsibility. Academy of Management Annals, 11(1), 105-149. https://doi.org/ 10.5465/annals.2015.0095. Go to original source...
    12. Bassiouni, D.H., & Hackley, Ch. (2014). Generation Z' children's adaptation to digital consumer culture: A critical literature review. Journal of Customer Behaviour, 13(2), 113-133. https://doi.org/10.1362/147539214X14024779483591. Go to original source...
    13. Bechmann, A. (2020). Tackling Disinformation and Infodemics Demands Media Policy Changes. Digital Journalism, 8(6), 855-963. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2020.1773887. Go to original source...
    14. Benediktov�, D., & �i�ka, M. (2018). Supplier Evaluation: A Comparison of the Approach of Czech and German Industrial Companies. Scientific Papers of the University of Pardubice, Series D: Faculty of Economics and Administration, 26(3), 951.
    15. Bhattacharya, C.B., & Sen, S. (2004). Doing better at doing good: When, why, and how consumers respond to corporate social initiatives. California Management Review, 47(1), 9-24. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166284. Go to original source...
    16. Blazquez, M., Alexander, B., & Fung, K. (2020). Exploring Millennial's perceptions towards luxury fashion wearable technology. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 24(3), 343-359. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMM-09-2019-0200. Go to original source...
    17. Borda, M., Grishchenko, N., & Kowalczyk-R�lczy�ska, P. (2022). Impact of Digital Inequality on the COVID-19 Pandemic: Evidence from European Union Countries. Sustainability, 14(5), 2850. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052850. Go to original source...
    18. Bose, S., Shams, S., Ali, M.J., & Mihret, D. (2022). COVID-19 impact, sustainability performance and firm value: international evidence. Accounting & Finance, 62, 597-643. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/acfi.12801. Go to original source...
    19. Brittain, S. (2016). Justifying the Teleological Methodology of the European Court of Justice: A Rebuttal. Irish Jurist, 55, 134-165.
    20. Carroll, A.B. (2016). Carroll's pyramid of CSR: taking another look. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 1, 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40991-016-0004-6 Go to original source...
    21. Cato, S., Iida, T., Ishida, K., Ito, A., & Katsumata H. (2021). Social media infodemics and social distancing under the COVID-19 pandemic: public good provisions under uncertainty. Global Health Action, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2021.1995958. Go to original source...
    22. Childs, N. M., & Maher, J. K. (2003). Gender in food advertising to children: boys eat first. British Food Journal, 105(7), 408-419. https://doi.org/10.1108/00070700310497219. Go to original source...
    23. Choi, Y. Kroff, M.W. & Junga, K. (2021). Developing brand advocacy through brand activities on Facebook. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 38, 328-38. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-10-2019-3460. Go to original source...
    24. Chung, S.Y. & Byrom, J. (2021). Co-creating consistent brand identity with employees in the hotel industry. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 30(1), 74-89. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-08-2019-2544. Go to original source...
    25. Chwistecka-Dudek, H. (2016). Corporate Social Responsibility: supporters vs. opponents of the concept. Forum Scientiae Oeconomia, 4(4), 171-179.
    26. Cvik, E. D., & MacGregor Pelik�nov�, R. (2021). The Significance of CSR during COVID-19 Pandemic in the Luxury Fashion Industry - A Front-Line Case Study. European Journal of Business Science and Technology, 7(1), 109-129. https://doi.org/ 10.11118/ejobsat.2021.005. Go to original source...
    27. Cwynar, A. (2021). Do Women Behave Financially Worse than Men? Evidence from Married and Cohabiting Couples Andrzej. Central European Business Review, 10(5): 81-98. https://doi.org/10.18267/j.cebr.270. Go to original source...
    28. �re�nar, R., & Nedelko, Z. (2020). Understanding future leaders: How are personal values of generations Y and Z tailored to leadership in industry 4.0? Sustainability, 12(11), 4417. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/su12114417. Go to original source...
    29. Duarte, P., Silva, S., Feitosa, W. R., & Sebastião, R. (2022). Are business students more financially literate? Evidence of differences in financial literacy amongst Portuguese college students. Young Consumers, 23(1), 144-161. https://doi.org/10.1108/YC-12-2020-1264. Go to original source...
    30. Fleming, R. C. & Mauger, R. (2021). Green and Just? An Update on the 'European Green Deal'. Journal for European Environmental & Planning Law, 18(1), 164-180. https://doi.org/ 10.1163/18760104-18010010. Go to original source...
    31. Gabarron, E., Oyeyemi, S. O. & Wynn, R. (2021). COVID-19-related misinformation on social media: a systematic review. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 99(6), 455-463A. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.20.276782. Go to original source...
    32. Goffin, K., & Mitchell, R. (2010). Innovation management. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. Go to original source...
    33. D�Adamo, I., & Lupi, G. (2021). Sustainability and resilience after COVID-19: A circular premium in the fashion industry. Sustainability, 13(4), 1861. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041861. Go to original source...
    34. Dembek, K., Singh, P., & Bhakoo, V. (2015). Literature Review of Shared Value: A Theoretical Concept or a Management Buzzword? Journal of Business Ethics, 137(2), 231-267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2554-z. Go to original source...
    35. Djafarova, E., & Foots, S. (2022). Exploring ethical consumption of generation Z: theory of planned behaviour. Young Consumers, 23(3), 413-431. https://doi.org/10.1108/YC-10-2021-1405. Go to original source...
    36. Duffett, R. (2020). The youtube marketing communication effect on cognitive, affective and behavioural attitudes among generation Z consumers. Sustainability, 12, 5075. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/su12125075. Go to original source...
    37. Dvoulet�, O. (2017). What is the Relationship between Entrepreneurship and Unemployment in Visegrad Countries? Central European Business Review, 6(2), 42-53. https://doi.org/ 10.18267/j.cebr.179. Go to original source...
    38. El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., Kwok, C. C. Y., & Mishra, D. R. (2011). Does corporate social responsibility affect the cost of capital? Journal of Banking & Finance, 35(9), 2388-2406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2011.02.007. Go to original source...
    39. Feng, Z., & Savani, K. (2020). Covid-19 created a gender gap in perceived work productivity and job satisfaction: implications for dual-career parents working from home. Gender in Management, 35(7/8), 719-736. https://doi.org/10.1108/GM-07-2020-0202. Go to original source...
    40. Franke, T.M., Ho, T., & Christie, Ch. A. (2012). The Chi-Square Test Often Used and More Often Misinterpreted. American Journal of Evaluation, 33(3), 448-458. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/1098214011426594. Go to original source...
    41. Friedman, M. (2007). The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits. In: Zimmerli, W.C., Holzinger, M., Richter, K. (eds) Corporate Ethics and Corporate Governance. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
    42. Glass, G. V. (1976). Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research. Educational Researcher, 5(10), 3-8. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X005010003. Go to original source...
    43. Goniewicz, K., Khorram-Manesh, A., Hertelendy A. J., Goniewicz, M., Naylor, K., & Burkle, F. M. (2020). Current Response and Management Decisions of the European Union to the COVID-19 Outbreak: A review. Sustainability, 12(9), 3838. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093838. Go to original source...
    44. Giurca, A., Befort, N., & Taylor, A. (2022). Exploring transformative policy imaginaries for a sustainable Post-COVID society. Journal of Cleaner Production, 344, 131053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131053. Go to original source...
    45. Gu, S., �lusarczyk, B., Hajizada, S., Kovalyova, I., & Sakhbieva, A. (2021). Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Online Consumer Purchasing Behavior. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 16(6), 2263-2281. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer16060125. Go to original source...
    46. H�la, M., Cvik, E. D. & MacGregor Pelik�nov�, R. (2022). Logistic Regression Of The Czech Luxury Fashion Purchasing Inclination In The Covid-19 Era - Old for Loyalty and Young for Sustainability. Folia Oeconomica Stetinensia, 22(1), 85-110. https://doi.org/10.2478/foli-2022-0005. Go to original source...
    47. Hasan, B., Mahi, M., Sarker, T., & Amin, R. (2021). Spillovers of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Impact on Global Economic Activity, the Stock Market, and the Energy Sector. Journal of Risk and Financial Management (JRFM), 14(5), 200. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm14050200. Go to original source...
    48. Hin�ica, V., Svobodov�, A., & �ez�nkov�, H. (2022). Consumer Perception of Quality of Clothing Products: A Lesson for the Business Sector Arising from Czech Evidence. Central European Business Review, 11(2), 101-121. https://doi.org/ 10.18267/j.cebr.292. Go to original source...
    49. Istijanto, & Handoko, I. (2022). What approach and avoidance factors drive Gen-Z consumers to buy bubble tea? An exploratory study. Young Consumers, 23(3), 382-396. https://doi.org/10.1108/YC-08-2021-1376. Go to original source...
    50. Ivanova, O., Flores-Zamora, J., Khelladi, I. & Ivanaj, S. (2019). The generational cohort effect in the context of responsible consumption. Management Decision, 57(5), 1162-1183. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-12-2016-0915. Go to original source...
    51. Jose, S. (2022). COVID vaccine and generation Z - a study of factors influencing adoption. Young Consumers, 23(1), 16-32. https://doi.org/10.1108/YC-01-2021-1276. Go to original source...
    52. Kita, P., �ambochov�, M., Strelinger, J., & Kitov� Mazal�nov�, V. (2021). Consumer Behavioiur of Slovak Households in the Sphere of Organic Food in the Context of Sustainable Consumption. Central European Business Review, 10(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/ 10.18267/j.cebr.256. Go to original source...
    53. Kolk, A., & Van Tulder, R. (2010). International Business, Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainable Development. International Business Review, 19(2), 119-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2009.12.003. Go to original source...
    54. Kopani�ov�, J., & Vokounov�, D. (2023). Cultural Differences in Coping with Changes in the External Environment - a Case of Behavioural Segmentation of Senior Consumers Based on Their Reaction to the Covid-19 Pandemic. Central European Business Review, 12(3), 21-46. https://doi.org/10.18267/j.cebr.325. Go to original source...
    55. Kov�cs, A. Z., Horv�th, B., Al-Zaidi, W. A. H., & Lencs�s, E. (2016). The Importance of Corporate and Social Involvement in the Implementation of Climate Friendly Projects. European Journal of Business Science and Technology, 2(2), 131-140. https://doi.org/10.11118/ejobsat.v2i2.57. Go to original source...
    56. Krippendorff, K. (2013). Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology. Los Angeles, CA: Sage publications.
    57. Kuckartz, U. (2014). Qualitative Text Analysis - A Guide to Methods, Practice and Using Software. CA: Sage Publications Ltd. Go to original source...
    58. Kufel, T. (2020). ARIMA-based forecasting of the dynamics of confirmed Covid-19 cases for selected European countries. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 15(2), 181-204. https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2020.009. Go to original source...
    59. Lapierre, M. A., Ashtaputre, A., & Stevens Aubrey, J. (2022). Boys Go, Girls Go Along: exploring gender and price differences regarding themes present on children's graphic t-shirts. Young Consumers, 23(3), 432-448. https://doi.org/10.1108/YC-07-2021-1353. Go to original source...
    60. Lau, M. M., Ng, P. M. L., Chan, E. A. H., & Cheung, C. T. Y. (2023). Examining purchase intention for luxury fashion: integrating theory of reasoned action, with affect-behavior-cognition (ABC) model, identity and social identity theories. Young Consumers, 24(1), 114-131. https://doi.org/10.1108/YC-07-2022-1557. Go to original source...
    61. Liu, M., & Koivula, A. (2023). Greed doesn't grow on trees: the indirect association between proenvironmental behaviour and materialism through adolescents' psychological entitlement. Young Consumers, 24(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1108/YC-09-2021-1388. Go to original source...
    62. Loureiro, E. (2022). Has Genderless Become a Fashion Design Label? Convergences - Journal of Research and Arts Education, 15(30), 99-109. https://doi.org/10.53681/c1514225187514391s.30.146. Go to original source...
    63. MacGregor Pelik�nov�, R. (2021). Internal Website Presentation of Czech Luxury Fashion Businesses in the Covid-19 Era. Marketing nad Management of Innovations, 3, 211-222. https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2021.3-18. Go to original source...
    64. MacGregor Pelik�nov�, R., & MacGregor, R. K. (2020). The EU puzzling CSR regime and the confused perception by ambassadors of luxury fashion businesses: A case study from Pa���sk�. Central European Business Review, 9(3), 74-108. https://doi.org/10.18267/j.cebr.240. Go to original source...
    65. MacGregor, R., Sroka, W., & MacGregor Pelik�nov�, R. (2020a). A Comparative Study Of The Low Managers Attitude To Marketing And Innovations In Luxury Fashion Industry: Pro - Or Anti-CSR? Polish Journal of Management Studies, 21(2), 240-255. https://doi.org/10.17512/pjms.2020.21.2.17. Go to original source...
    66. MacGregor, R., Sroka, W., & MacGregor Pelik�nov�, R. (2020b). The CSR Perception of Front-line Employees of Luxury Fashion Businesses: Fun or Free for Sustainability? Organizacija, 53(3), 198-211. https://doi.org/10.2478/orga-2020-0013. Go to original source...
    67. MacGregor Pelik�nov�, R., & H�la, M. (2021). CSR Unconscious Consumption by Generation Z in the COVID-19 era - Responsible Heretics not Paying CSR Bonus? Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 14(8), 390. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm14080390. Go to original source...
    68. MacGregor Pelik�nov�, R., Cvik, E.D., & MacGregor, R. K. (2021a). Addressing the COVID-19 challenges by SMEs in the hotel industry - a Czech sustainability message for emerging economies. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 13(4), 525-546. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEEE-07-2020-0245. Go to original source...
    69. MacGregor Pelik�nov�, R., MacGregor, R.K., & �ernek, M. (2021b). New trends in codes of ethics: Czech business ethics preferences by the dawn of COVID-19. Oeconomia Copernicana, 12(4), 973-1009. https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2021.032. Go to original source...
    70. MacGregor Pelik�nov�, R., & Rub��ek, F. (2022). Taxonomy for transparency in non-financial statements - clear duty with unclear sanction. Danube, 13(3), 173-195. https://doi.org/10.2478/danb-2022-0011. Go to original source...
    71. MacGregor Pelik�nov�, R., & Sani, M. (2023). Luxury, Slow and Fast Fashion - A Case study on the (Un)sustainable Creating of Shared Values. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 18(3), 813-851. https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2023.026 Go to original source...
    72. Mahrous, A. A., & Genedy, M.A. (2019). Connecting the dots: The relationship among intra-organizational environmental, entrepreneurial orientation, market orientation and organization performance. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 11(1), 2-21. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEEE-09-2016-0036. Go to original source...
    73. Ma�ecka, J., �ucka, T., �ebestov�, J., & �perka, R. (2017). Economic Activity and Social Determinants Versus Entrepreneurship in SMEs - Selected Aspects. Copernican Journal of Finance & Accounting, 6(3), 47-61. https://doi.org/10.12775/CJFA.2017.016. Go to original source...
    74. Marinova, D., & Raven, M. (2006). Indigenous Knowledge and Intellectual Property: A Sustainable Agenda. Journal of Economic Surveys, 20(4), 587-605. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.2006.00260.x. Go to original source...
    75. Marta-Lazo, C. (2020). Times of emotions and infodemics. Mediterranean Journal of Communication, 11(2), 5-6. https://doi.org/ 10.14198/MEDCOM2020.11.2.26. Go to original source...
    76. Mart�nez-Gonz�lez, J. A., Parra-L�pez, E., & Barrientos-B�ez, A. (2021). Young Consumers' Intention to Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Integrated Model. Sustainability, 13(1), 430. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010430. Go to original source...
    77. McComb, Ch., & Jablokow, K. (2022). A conceptual framework for multidisciplinary design research with example application to agent-based modelling. Design Studies, 78, 101074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2021.101074. Go to original source...
    78. McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2000). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Correlation or misspecification? Strategic Management Journal, 21(5), 603-609. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200005)21:5<603::AID-SMJ101>3.0.CO;2-3. Go to original source...
    79. Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., Behrens, W. W. (1972). The limits to growth. New York, USA: Universe Books.
    80. Mele, C., Russo-Spena, T., Tregua, M., & Amitrano, C. C. A. (2021). The millennial customer journey: A Phygital mapping of emotional, behavioural, and social experiences. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 38, 420-33. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-03-2020-3701. Go to original source...
    81. Moon, H.-C., Hur, Y-K., Yin, W., & Helm. C. (2014). Extending Porter�s generic strategies: from three to eight. European Journal of International Management, 8(2), 205-225. https://doi.org/10.1504/EJIM.2014.059583. Go to original source...
    82. Nagel, L. (2020). The influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on the digital transformation of work. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 40(9/10), 861-875. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSSP-07-2020-0323. Go to original source...
    83. Okoli, Ch., & Pawlowski, S.D. (2004). The Delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applications. Information & Management, 42(1), 15-29. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.im.2003.11.002. Go to original source...
    84. Ol�anov�, K., Gook, G., & Zlati�, M. (2018). Influence of Luxury Companies� Corporate Social Responsibility Activities on Consumer Purchase Intention: Development of Theoretical Framework. Central European Business Review, 7(3), 1-25. Go to original source...
    85. Osei-Tutu, J. J. (2019). Socially Responsible Corporate IP. Florida International University Legal Studies Research Paper Series. Research Paper No. 19-01.
    86. Pardal, P., Dias, R., �ule�, P., Teixeira, N., & Krulick�, T. (2020). Integration in Central European capital markets in the context of the global COVID-19 pandemic. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 15(4), 627-650. https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2020.027. Go to original source...
    87. Pascual, E. M. (2020). The European Green Deal: A Possible Green Exit From The Covid-19 Crisis? Revista General De Derecho Europeo, No. 51, Article 422523.
    88. Petera, P., Wagner, J., & Pak�iov�, R. (2017). Empirical Study of Approach to Sustainability Management and Reporting in the Czech and Slovak Republic‎. In New Trends In Finance And Accounting: Proceedings of the 17th Annual Conference on Finance and Accounting (pp. 547-558). Springer International Publishing. Go to original source...
    89. Piekarczyk, A. (2016). Contemporary organization and a perspective on integration and development. Oeconomia Copernicana, 7(3), 467-483. https://doi.org/10.12775/OeC.2016.027. Go to original source...
    90. Polcyn, J., St�pie�, S., & Czy�ewski, B. (2019). The Measurement of the Quality of the Environment and its Determinants in Poland and in the Regional Perspective. Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Oeconomica, 21(2), 11-21. https://doi.org/ 10.29302/oeconomica.2019.21.2.1. Go to original source...
    91. Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating shared value. Harvard business review, 89(1/2), 62-67.
    92. Porter M. E., & Kramer M. R. (2019). Creating Shared Value. In: Lenssen G., Smith N. (eds). Managing Sustainable Business. Dordrecht: Springer. Go to original source...
    93. Renzi, M.F., Ungaro, V., Di Pietro, L., Guglielmetti Mugion, R., & Pasca, M.G. (2022). Agenda 2030 and COVID-19: A Young Consumer's Perception of Sustainable Consumption. Sustainability, 22(14), 15627. https://doi.org/10.3390/ su142315627. Go to original source...
    94. Ritter, T., & Pedersen, C. L. (2020). Analyzing the impact of the coronavirus crisis on business models. Industrial Marketing Management, 88, 214-224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.05.014. Go to original source...
    95. Rodriguez-Fernandez, M. (2016). Social responsibility and financial performance. The role of good corporate governance. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 19, 137-151. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.brq.2015.08.001. Go to original source...
    96. Roman, A.-G., Mocanu, M., & Hoinaru, R. (2019). Disclosure Style and Its Determinants in Integrated Reports. Sustainability, 11, 1960. https://doi.org/10.3390/su1107960. Go to original source...
    97. Rosdiana, R. (2020). Analysis f Investment Interests, Motivation, Social Environment, Financial Literacy (Comparative Study Of Generation Z And Millennial Generation). International Journal of Business, Economics and Law, 22(1), 111-121. Go to original source...
    98. Royo-Vela, M., & Cuevas Lizama, J. (2022). Creating Shared Value: Exploration in an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem. Sustainability, 14(14), 8505. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148505. Go to original source...
    99. Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (2014). Methods of Meta-Analysis - Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings. London, UK: SAGE. Go to original source...
    100. Schorn, A., Vinzenz, F., & Wirth, W. (2022). Promoting sustainability on Instagram: How sponsorship disclosures and benefit appeals affect the credibility of sinnfluencers. Young Consumers, 23(3), 345-361. https://doi.org/10.1108/YC-07-2021-1355. Go to original source...
    101. Sch�z, M. (2012). Sustainable Corporate Responsibility - The Foundation of successful Business in the New Millennium. Central European Business Review, 1(2), 7-15. https://doi.org/10.18267/j.cebr.12. Go to original source...
    102. Silverman, D. (2013). Doing Qualitative Research - A Practical Handbook. London, UK: SAGE.
    103. Sroka, W., & L�rinczy, M. (2015). The perception of ethics in business: Analysis of research results. Procedia Economics and Finance, 34, 156-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01614-7. Go to original source...
    104. Sroka, W., & Sz�nt�, R. (2018). Corporate Social Responsibility and Business Ethics in Controversial Sectors: Analysis of Research Results. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation - JEMI, 14, 111-126. https://doi.org/10.7341/20181435. Go to original source...
    105. Strouhal, J., Gurvit�, N., Nikitina-Kalam�e, M., & Startseva, E. (2015). Finding the link between CSR reporting and corporate financial performance: evidence on Czech and Estonian listed companies. Central European Business Review, 4(3), 48-59. https://doi.org/10.18267/j.cebr.132. Go to original source...
    106. Svenson Harari, N., Fundin, A., & Carlsson, A. L. (2020) A Participatory Research Approach for studying the Design Process of Flexible Assembly Systems. Procedia CIRP, 93, 1043-1048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2020.04.021. Go to original source...
    107. �ebestov�, J., Krej��, P., & �i�ka, P. (2018). Be or Not to Be: A Dilemma of Business Policy Support on a Regional Level. Central European Business Review, 7(1), 3-13. https://doi.org/ 10.18267/j.cebr.192. Go to original source...
    108. �pi�ka, J., Vintr, T., Aulov�, R., & Mach��kov�, J. (2020). Trade-off between the economic and environmental sustainability in Czech dual farm structure. Agricultural Economics, 66(6), 243-250. https://doi.org/10.17221/390/2019-AGRICECON. Go to original source...
    109. �pi�ka, J., & N�glov�, Z. (2022). Consumer segmentation in the meat market-The case study of Czech Republic. Agricultural Economics, 68(2), 68-77. https://doi.org/ 10.17221/334/2021-AGRICECON. Go to original source...
    110. Tagliapietra, S., & Veugelers, R. (2021). Fostering the Industrial Component of the European Green Deal: Key Principles and Policy Options. Intereconomics - Review of European Economic Policy, 56(6), 305-310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10272-021-1006-5. Go to original source...
    111. Tahal, R., & Form�nek, T. (2022). Environmental Stances and Lifestyle Preferences in Czechia: Generational Aspects and Socio-Demographic Implications. Central European Business Review, 11(5), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.18267/j.cebr.305. Go to original source...
    112. Tehreem, F., & Ahmad, R.B. (2019). Achieving SME performance through individual entrepreneurial orientation: An active social networking. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 12(3), 399-411. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEEE-03-2019-0037. Go to original source...
    113. Thomas, M. R., Madiya, M., & Shivani, M. P. (2021). Customer Profiling of Alpha: The Next Generation Marketing. Ushus Journal of Business Management, 19(1), 75-86. https://doi.org/10.12725/ujbm.50.5. Go to original source...
    114. Ting, H., Ling, J., & Cheah, J. H. (2020). Editorial: It will go Away!? Pandemic Crisis and Business in Asia. Asian Journal of Business Research, 10(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/ 10.14707/ajbr.200072. Go to original source...
    115. Ting, H., Morrison, A. M., Leong, Ch.-M., Kumarusamy, R., Leong. Q-L. (2021). Responsibility, Responsible Tourism, and Our Response. Journal of Responsible Tourism Management, 1(2), 1-9. https://doi.org/ 10.47263/JRTM.01-02-01. Go to original source...
    116. Ting, I. W. K., Azizan, N. A., Bhaskaran, R. et al. (2019). Corporate Social Performance and Firm Performance: Comparative Study among Developed and Emerging Market Firms. Sustainability, 12, 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010026. Go to original source...
    117. Turner, A. (2015). Generation Z: Technology and Social Interest. The Journal of Individual Psychology, 71(2), 103-113. https://doi.org/10.1353/jip.2015.0021. Go to original source...
    118. Vac�k, E., �pa�ek, M, Fotr, J., & Krac�k, L. (2018). Project Portfolio Optimization As A Part Of Strategy Implementation Process In Small And Medium-Sized Enterprises: A Methodology Of The Selection Of Projects With The Aim To Balance Strategy, Risk And Performance. E+M, Ekonomie a Management, 21(3), 107-123. https://doi.org/10.15240/tul/001/2018-3-007. Go to original source...
    119. Van Tulder, R., May Seitanidi, M., Crane, A. & Brammer, S. (2016). Enhancing the Impact of Cross-Sector Partnerships. Four Impact Loops for Channeling Partnership Studies. Journal of Business Ethics, 135, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2756-4. Go to original source...
    120. Van Tulder, R., & Keen, N. (2018). Capturing Collaborative Challenges: Designing Complexity-Sensitive Theories of Change for Cross-Sector Partnerships. Journal of Business Ethics, 150, 315-332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3857-7. Go to original source...
    121. Van Schoelandt, C. (2018). Moral accountability and social norms. Social Philosophy and Policy, 35(1), 217-236. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010026. Go to original source...
    122. V�vrov�, J. (2022). Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Corporate Social Responsibility in the Hotel Industry - Case of the Czech Republic. Journal of Tourism and Services, 25(13), 213-229. https://doi.org/10.29036/jots.v13i25.414. Go to original source...
    123. Vourvachis, P., & Woodward, T. (2015). Content analysis in social and environmental reporting research: Trends and challenges. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 16(2), 166-195. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-04-2013-0027. Go to original source...
    124. Vrabcov�, P., & Urbancov�, H. (2021). Approaches of selected organisations in the Czech Republic to promoting the concept of sustainable development and corporate social responsibility. Agricultural Economics - Czech, 67(7), 255-265. https://doi.org/10.17221/8/2021-AGRICECON. Go to original source...
    125. Woo, E., & Kim, Y.G. (2019). Consumer attitudes and buying behavior for green food products: From the aspect of green perceived value (GPV). British Food Journal, 121(2), 320-332. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-01-2018-0027. Go to original source...
    126. World Health Organization (2022). Infodemic. Health Topics. Retrieved February 17, 2022, from https://www.who.int/health-topics/infodemic#tab=tab_1.
    127. Yin, R. K. (2008). Study Research. Design Methods. CA: Sage.
    128. Yiu, D. W., & Lau, C. M. (2008). Corporate entrepreneurship as resource capital configuration in emerging market firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(1,) 37-57. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2007.00215.x. Go to original source...
    129. �i�ka, M. (2012). Slu�by v kontextu podnikatelsk�ho prost�ed� �esk� republiky. E&M Economics and Management, 15(4), 97-107.

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content