Wikidata:Requests for deletions

Requests for deletions

Items that do not meet Wikidata's notability policy can be deleted. Please nominate items for deletions on this page under the "Requests" section below. If it is obvious vandalism, just add the page here (gadget available), or ping an administrator to delete it. Contact can also be made with an administrator in #wikidata^connect.

Please use {{Q+}} the first time you mention an item. Unless you use the gadget, please also ping the item's creator in your request (or ping the bot operator, when appropriate) if the user is still active on Wikidata and the user has contributed the majority of information in that item.

Please use Wikidata:Properties for deletion if you want to nominate a property for deletion.

Duplicate items should be merged, not deleted: see Help:Merge.

Do not blank items in anticipation of deletion. In particular, do not remove sitelinks, even if you have requested the deletion of the page in the sitelink's target wiki or if you think that sitelinks of this type should not have Wikidata items.

This is not the place to request undeletion. Please read Wikidata:Guide to requests for undeletion and either contact the deleting admin or use Wikidata:Administrators' noticeboard instead.

More information

Add a new request

Translate this header box!

On this page, old requests are archived, if they are marked with {{Deleted}}. An overview of all archives can be found at this page's archive index. The current archive is located at Wikidata:Requests for deletions/Archive/2025/01/09.

Requests for deletions

high

_{~114 open requests for deletions.}

Pages tagged with {{Delete}}

None at the moment

if this list is out of date.

Requests

Please add a new request at the bottom of this section, using {{subst:Rfd |1=PAGENAME |2=REASON FOR DELETION }}.

Bulk deletion request: 543 recently created items on legislation

The following query currently yields 543 unlinked items, that were recently created by User:Olea as part of a botched data import. Each of these items corresponds to an arbitrary text in "legalReferenceName" field of Nationally designated areas inventory (Q1116062). This arbitrary text generally includes comments (clarifying notes, selection of paragraphs, URL or alike) in addition to actual title(s) of legislative act(s). I've corrected some links to use previously existing items using section, verse, paragraph, or clause (P958) qualifier, e.g. here: Special:Diff/1487860134. Some source database fields apparently have been imported multiple times, e.g. identical Q108052947 (unlinked) and Q108065223 (linked). Some apparently are duplicate as many times as they occur in source database, e.g. Q108062713, Q108061580, Q108053019, Q108059945, Q108052798 are all for "Zakon o zaštiti prirode" act of the same country. Possibly a few of these items can be converted to an item on particular legislative act which already doesn't have Wikidata item, but then again going through all of them one by one is probably not worth the effort and it's easier create items for some mentioned legislative acts later if needed. As these 543 items are unlinked then I think it's reasonable and safe to just delete them. Another around 350 items (excluded from the following query) originating from the same source database field are linked and need further attention.

SELECT ?item ?title WHERE {
  ?item wdt:P31 wd:Q820655.
  ?item wdt:P921 wd:Q832237.
  ?item wdt:P1476 ?title.
  MINUS { ?a ?b ?item. }
}

Try it!

--2001:7D0:81DA:F780:604F:52EA:F1D7:1B0E 13:29, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

@Olea: Please comment. --Emu (talk) 19:37, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

 Info notified creator on talk page --Emu (talk) 20:56, 26 October 2021 (UTC)

Hi:

1. this import is from an official source;
2. the items describes present legislation, so to me they are valid WD elements;
3. the content (labels, etc) are as arbitrary as national governments provided; I agree they could be cleaned, but does not implies removing;
4. duplicates are bad, agreed, it's only a matter of merging duplicates as are detected;
5. finally, as many times happen in Wikidata, one task we could describe, if you want, as suboptimal, is an enhancement over a previous void and a base for refinement. In this case as elements uses statute (Q820655) and environmental protection (Q832237) they are significant collection of environment legislation susceptible to be reused.

On the personal side, I don't feel confortable answering deletion requests from anonymous users. —Ismael Olea (talk) 19:12, 28 October 2021 (UTC)

I don't question reliability of this source database, nor do I say that it's wrong that this external database uses arbitrary text to make reference to legislation. The problem is that you have imported this data in a rather careless and messy way. In your import scheme this arbitrary reference text denotes title (P1476) of an individual legislative document, while in most cases it actually does not.

You say to you items in question are "valid WD elements". However, valid item per WD:N should be about "clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity". While items in question in most cases are not. They would be only if parts are cut, or split, or amended, or in other words, if these items are more or less repurposed one by one. It's probably fine if new items sometimes need refinement to be adequate, but then again there probably should be some sort of threshold for quality as well. If you put up such tremendous cleanup for others as a "base for refinement", then I wouldn't consider it constructive really.

While there are many other problems with this particular import (as I commented here and here earlier), I'm not suggesting that it all should be deleted, either. However it doesn't seem worth the effort to clean up some items resulting from this import, such as those matching given query. 2001:7D0:81DA:F780:F8CE:3552:59E2:58D9 10:39, 29 October 2021 (UTC)

Q106098841

WikiJournal administrative board (Q106098841): administrators of the WikiJournal User Group: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable Gymnicus (talk) 18:24, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

Request retention of this one. I think it fills a structural need: firstly for tracking a relevant group of P527s and also used in queries within tracking statistics such as this one. T.Shafee(evo&evo) (talk) 04:43, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

{{not done}} per [1]. If you want this item deleted, you need to explain why a lot better than 'Not notable'. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 18:38, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

@Mike Peel: Why do you then delete the data object Q109408582, which was nominated with the same reason? --Gymnicus (talk) 19:15, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

@Gymnicus: This item has substantially more content (particularly through has part(s) (P527)), and I thought it had items linking to it (but I can't see them now - maybe they were removed?). Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 19:19, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

@Mike Peel: They weren't removed by me, if that's what you think. I am not allowed to do that anymore, but I would never have done that either. It is still the case that this item has no independent sources and neither does it fulfill any of the other two points of WD:N. --Gymnicus (talk) 19:23, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

@Gymnicus: I wasn't meaning to accuse you of that: I was just noting what I could see, but probably my memory was wrong. It seems to meet the structural needs part of the notability requirements, but let's see what other admins think about this. Regardless, please give more context when requesting something for deletion. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 19:30, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

this doesn't seem notable to me. BrokenSegue (talk) 03:04, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 13:58, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

 Keep; it has a structural purpose (mainly through has part(s) (P527)). Tol (talk | contribs) @ 20:08, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

 Keep; this item lists multiple notable items. Can be good for educational and historical purpose. Sunil1388 (talk) 12:47, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

Q103854749

Dickinson, Emily (1830-1886), poet (Q103854749): encyclopedia article: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Lacks notability, malformed, reasoning at Wikidata:Requests_for_deletions/Archive/2021/12/23#Q103854749 doesn't seem sound --- Jura 01:53, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

CC @Mike Peel as the admin who closed the previous RfD. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 19:34, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

 Keep I think Dickinson, Emily (1830-1886), poet (Q103854749) is notable per WD:N#2: "It refers to an instance of a clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity. The entity must be notable, in the sense that it can be described using serious and publicly available references." (demonstrated by the statements being referenced). Martin Urbanec (talk) 19:34, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

WHat's are the serious references about the concept? Please provide. --- Jura 19:43, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

See references in the item. Martin Urbanec (talk) 20:40, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

I don't think Crossref (Q5188229) qualifies. Title and author of a encyclopedia article are generally not considered statements that need reference. The article itself doesn't seem to be object of studies. No information seems to be present that wouldn't be on Q4441. --- Jura 20:45, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

•  Comment it looked fine to me, in line with the other publications that we have items for. It has a DOI that links to the full text (but sadly not CC licensed, so we can't have it on Wikisource). Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 19:39, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

  The information can directly be added to Q4441, we have described by source (P1343) for this. --- Jura 19:44, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

•  Comment Is there any purpose in having items like this and thousands like it which are duplicating the role of the external identifier American National Biography ID (P4823) ? Piecesofuk (talk) 18:55, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
• Is the text PD? If it is = we would add it to Wikisource and need the entry to hold the link. --RAN (talk) 08:06, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

  Unlikely, the dictionary was first published in 1999 by Oxford University Press: https://www.anb.org/page/about Piecesofuk (talk) 15:55, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

  Q4441#P4823 now has the same info. Format matches that at Q4441#P4223. =>  Delete --- Jura 13:28, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

•  Keep Keeping the encyclopedia article as a separate item facilitates data like publication date, publisher, etc. which can be used by citation templates like Template:Cite Q (Q22321052) — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 11:02, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

  So Cite Q doesn't work for encyclopedias, IMDB and other larger works? Maybe time to fix it. --- Jura 17:16, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

•  Comment this kind of item is just annoying and doesn't serve any purpose. It's o.k. for those biographical encyclopedias that have been mirrored on Wikisource, but for everything else please delete and stick to the item itself. Same goes for all those Benezit and AKL entry items. If we keep this kind of stuff, we need to create an item describing each Wikidata item and so forth... --Anvilaquarius (talk) 15:35, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

Q76364705 (faked family tree)

Harry James Albert Cavendish Taylor-Berkeley (Q76364705): British businessman: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs | discussion)

Not a real person --82.163.156.169 02:19, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 02:20, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

 Comment Please don'r blank the item. Fralambert (talk) 03:33, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

• Actually he is a real person -- he's registered with Companies House as a director of two companies. And his parents (also originally directors of one of the companies) both exist in the official Somerset House register of births marriages and deaths.

For the last couple of years he's been running a small online webstore for high-end clothing, trading on his supposed aristocratic connections. (The business initially also had a small bricks-and-mortar shop, but that location is now a toy shop).

(UPDATE: The business's website has now dropped off the net [2]).

What is not real is (most of) the 14-generation family tree he submitted to the The Peerage person ID (P4638) website in 2005, which we copied over here when we imported that site. (cf descent on talk page / permalink / archived copy, and reverse tree on talk page / permalink / archived copy.)

(UPDATE: Research trees now moved to Talk:Q110323267/Paternal_line and Talk:Q110323267/Ancestral_tree, sub talkpages of TP Taylor-Berkeley hoax family tree (Q110323267) Jheald (talk) 13:33, 28 January 2022 (UTC))

For the moment, can I ask that we keep the page, as I've been using its talk page as a central organising point for investigating just how much of what he sent in was real, and how much was fictional. As far as I've been able to determine, the paternal side of his tree is completely fake for ten generations beyond his grandfather, while the maternal side appears to contain more reality, other than the link to aristocratic family his business is named after (which conceivably might have been an honest mistake). On this side it's more challenging to identify the line between what's been completely made up and what may be real. I've been working up the information because there's a specialist in the Faulder family I'd like to discuss that part of the supposed tree with. (See Talk:Q76364677, Talk:Q76364674).

As to how to go forward: I've been in touch with Darryl Lundy at ThePeerage, and he is now in the process of removing everything Taylor-Berkeley has ever sent him from his site. But because this material has been around on the internet for so long, I think there may be a case to  Keep [revised view below] keep it, but with statements suitably marked to indicate where they are false, because there will be sites and genealogies that have copied it, so rather than outright removal (which may allow disinformation to come back again later), it may be better to maintain statements here, but mark that they are false, to salt the ground.

I have made a start on this by eg deprecating the spurious value at Q75271615#P22, and identifying George Thomas Herbert Taylor (Q76374569)instance of (P31)human whose existence is disputed (Q21070568), but there may be better ways. (Pinging the genealogy project below, for discussion). I haven't gone through and done this systematically though yet, for all the tens of different items involved, because I was finding it useful for templates like {{Wikidata/FamilyTree}} still to show the claimed data, while I was still investigating. I'm open to discussion as to what is the best way to go forward on this (and will also start a thread on the genealogy project). But IMO not helpful for an SPA like AnnaBoyd109 (talk • contribs • logs) to turn up and start blanking all my work pages. Jheald (talk) 10:21, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

ChristianKl (talk) 15:11, 24 June 2017 (UTC) Melderick (talk) 12:22, 25 July 2017 (UTC) Richard Arthur Norton Jklamo (talk) 20:21, 14 October 2017 (UTC) Sam Wilson Gap9551 (talk) 18:41, 5 November 2017 (UTC) Jrm03063 (talk) 15:46, 22 May 2018 (UTC) Egbe Eugene (talk) Eugene233 (talk) 03:40, 19 June 2018 (UTC) Dcflyer (talk) 07:45, 9 September 2018 (UTC) Gamaliel (talk) 13:01, 12 July 2019 (UTC) Pablo Busatto (talk) 11:51, 24 August 2019 (UTC) Theklan (talk) 19:25, 20 December 2019 (UTC) SM5POR (talk) 20:17, 29 May 2020 (UTC) Pmt (talk) 23:22, 27 June 2020 (UTC) CarlJohanSveningsson (talk) 12:13, 30 July 2020 (UTC) Ayack (talk) 14:39, 12 October 2020 (UTC) EthanRobertLee (talk) 19:17, 20 December 2020 (UTC) -- Darwin ^Ahoy! 18:20, 25 December 2020 (UTC) Germartin1 (talk) 03:13, 30 December 2020 (UTC) Skim (talk) 00:13, 10 January 2021 (UTC) El Dubs (talk) 21:55, 29 April 2021 (UTC) CAFLibrarian (talk) 16:36, 30 September 2021 (UTC) Jheald (talk) 18:50, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

Notified participants of WikiProject Genealogy Jheald (talk) 10:43, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

• Excellent detective work! --RAN (talk) 13:20, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
• @Jheald: Doing the Lord's work again. Well done. Gamaliel (talk) 15:22, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
• I previously created disproven person (Q88139392) and possibly disproven person (Q88181701) to tag people described in fake genealogies.--GZWDer (talk) 21:52, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
• @Jheald: I have been thinking about this use case. First I completely agree with the non deletion of the data for the reason you mentionned that it could come back from somewhere else : that was exactly the reason why was created the deprecated state. As for how to proceed, I would do it like this :

First, deprecate the instance of (P31) = human (Q5) on all the items under suspicion, with reason for deprecated rank (P2241) = possibly invalid entry requiring further references (Q35779580) (or any better reason)

Add instance of (P31) = human whose existence is disputed (Q21070568) on them

Deprecate, as well, all the family links between a valid human and a suspicious one. Deprecate on both sides and use the same reason for deprecated rank (P2241). No point in changing the family links between 2 suspicious people.

Your investigation on an item will either conclude it's about a real human or a fictional one

In the case of a real human, you would undo the changes made previously

In the case of a fictional one, you would change the instance of (P31)

After your investigation, any confirmed errors should be marked with reason for deprecated rank (P2241) = error in referenced source or sources (Q29998666) (or any better reason)

When ThePeerage will remove those data, you should deprecate The Peerage person ID (P4638) identifiers, with reason withdrawn identifier value (Q21441764)

--Melderick (talk) 02:13, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

• @Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ), Gamaliel, GZWDer, Melderick, AnnaBoyd109, Halloumi1: My thinking on this has been evolving. I pinged Andrew Gray and Tagishsimon last night on twitter [3], and these were their thoughts:

Andrew Gray [4] Hmm - this is bad data in TP? I would just say root it all out (going in both directions) until we get to records with demonstrably good data upstream/downstream - there's no reason to try and keep stuff we know to be outright wrong.

Could have an issue if we get a second import later but honestly I think that's unlikely.

Looking at your comments on the RFD - honestly I think the potential value of keeping it marked as "known to be wrong" is outweighed by the confusion that keeping it may cause. Easier just to  Delete it all and leave a note on the talkpages at each end of the gap.

Tagishsimon [5] per AG,  Delete anything that cannot be corroborated. [but he was intrigued by the mix of SPA and IP activity]

I'm not sure I agree with "leave a note on the talkpages at each end of the gap", because I don't think people read talk pages. But I do think it could be possible to add something like spouse (P26) = <some value> / object named as (P1932) = <name> with reason for deprecated rank (P2241) = hoax (Q190084) and statement is subject of (P805) = TP Taylor-Berkeley hoax family tree (Q110323267)

I also think it's worth moving the material analysing the tree off their current talk pages and over to sub-pages of the talk page of TP Taylor-Berkeley hoax family tree (Q110323267). This has the advantages of keeping things better together; and also making the location of the analysis independent of the question of what to do with the different pages.

Turning to the different pages, I think there may be three broad different sets to consider. First, pages that are sandwiched between in a line with actual real people at the top and the bottom -- ie pages like George Thomas Herbert Taylor (Q76374569) the claimed father of Edward Taylor (Q75271615) or George James Frederick Faulder (Q76375256) and Gertrude Brisco (Q76375257) claimed parents of Thomas Jefferson Faulder (Q75982856) and Eleanor Jane Faulder (Q76115436). I think these pages it is worth keeping, so people can easily compare statements on the false entries with the true ones, particularly if they have found material relating to the false people out on the internet. For eg George Thomas Herbert Taylor (Q76374569) it's much better IMO to have a complete separate deprecated page for this person with his false bio, rather than a messy mass of deprecated statements on the real Herbert Taylor (Q107484848).

The second group of pages I see is the very fictional paternal line of HJACTB -- all of the fake Taylor-Berkeleys. Here I'm in more agreement with Andrew, and I think we could delete these pages (and the pages for their wives, where these are not indepently in eg Burke's). What saves us here (IMO) is the very fact of there not being any real Taylor Berkeleys -- so, as far as I can see, people haven't identified these fake personas with their real ancestors, and this material seems to have spread very little across the internet. Here I think it would be enough just to delete and leave statements pointing to a page about the Taylor-Berkeley hoax.

The third group is the page for Harry James Albert Cavendish Taylor-Berkeley (Q76364705) himself and what appear to be those of his ancestors that are actually real. Here there are BLP issues to consider, as well as notability. From the amount of SPA and IP activity on his page, he's obviously not happy that #2 hit on his name at Google is currently identifying him as "perpetrator of Taylor-Berkeley hoax family tree". (And no @Halloumi1:, re diff a statement is not slanderous if it is true). Here I am not so sure about the best way to go forward. But I will move the research to a separate page to decouple it from whether we should keep a page for him himself. Jheald (talk) 12:34, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

To expand a bit on what I commented earlier, I think Melderick's suggested approach is worth doing where it's an "important" error, one that's been around for years, keeps appearing in good faith in history books, etc. - eg Q27653532 definitely existed, but her recorded father seems to be spurious, but since a lot of sources talk about it we want to acknowledge the claim. But I don't think this is such a case - it's a relatively minor claim that's wound up in one database we imported from a bit uncritically. So my recommendation is delete everything, in both case #1 and case #2, that isn't easily identifiable as a real person attestable outside of TP.

I'm not sure I see the advantage of keeping data in case #1, to be honest. If we have a large set of "mostly deprecated" items still interlinked into the real data, it will start to get confusing for people to interpret. Andrew Gray (talk) 21:31, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

Basshunter/Eurohunter cleanup (2)

• Basshunter SoundCloud account (Q83807994) (no sitelinks or references)
• Basshunter (Q59437791) (all sitelinks are redirects)
• gold record for Saturday by Basshunter (Q106777190) (no references or sitelinks, reference can be add to the artist's item instead)
• Category:Basshunter by year (Q107083961) (sitelinks only to Commons, typical Commons category intersection)
• Category:Basshunter in 2007 (Q107083965) (sitelinks only to Commons, typical Commons category intersection)
• Category:Basshunter in 2008 (Q107083969) (sitelinks only to Commons, typical Commons category intersection)
• Category:Basshunter in 2009 (Q107083973) (sitelinks only to Commons, typical Commons category intersection)
• Category:Basshunter logos (Q107083953) (sitelinks only to Commons, typical Commons category intersection)
• Category:Signatures of Basshunter (Q107083957) (sitelinks only to Commons, typical Commons category intersection)
• outline of Basshunter (Q88951397) (enwiki article was redirected or deleted)
• 1st Bass Challenge Sound 3 (Q65088576) (no sitelinks)

This was listed at Wikidata:Requests for deletions/Archive/2021/B/basshunter, but somehow missed deletion. At least for the first one, most seem to agree that it should be deleted and it was actually the reason for the subsequent nominations. --- Jura 16:22, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

In case of Q83807994 and Q65088576 that would be a violation of the Wikidata rules as there is no reason for it. I will just add reference for gold record for Saturday by Basshunter (Q106777190). Eurohunter (talk) 21:15, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

The question is if the items meet our notability requirements. Despite working on these for months now, they are still mostly without references.

Awards can be added to the artist's item (or the items for the work), no need to create gold record for Saturday by Basshunter (Q106777190). --- Jura 15:21, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

@Jura1: But you know gold record for Saturday by Basshunter (Q106777190) - this is existing and notable pshyical item which can be described in Wikidata like wedding dress of Catherine Middleton (Q599) or basically anything? I did not add references yet because they already meet linking criteria but I have plans to add them so I will just add them faster. Eurohunter (talk) 10:56, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

Well, wedding dress of Catherine Middleton (Q599) has clear indications of notability. I understand that you consider Q106777190 to be the same, but I just don't share that view. --- Jura 11:02, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

haha personally of coure but I mean that there are references but hey - it is already referenced by [6] so claim "no references or sitelinks" is untrue. Eurohunter (talk) 21:48, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

Sorry about that, I corrected it above. --- Jura 10:42, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

I support deleting the items. There's no good reason to have special items for social media accounts. ChristianKl ❪✉❫ 13:15, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

 Delete--Oursana (talk) 23:03, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

Q110531067

Q110531067: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Creator removed all data Snackmurat (talk) 17:11, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 17:20, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

 Comment Author @Bodur07 seems to be having trouble finding this page and has instead been continually blanking the item. They appear to be requesting deletion. Although they are the original author of the item, it has also been improved by several other editors. The item has identifiers and references (albeit weak), so arguably meets criterion 2. It has an incoming link, so arguably meets criterion 3. The author may also be the subject of the item, but I have no clear indication either way. Bovlb (talk) 17:50, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

Q63384701

list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter (Q63384701): Wikimedia list article: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs | discussion)

Conflation: The enwiki sitelink should be on a separate item for the list, all statements should be on Q383541. Once the split completed, this can be deleted. --- Jura 18:55, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 19:00, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

Not all statements but just award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411). And where is Q62098823 and Q66112460? Eurohunter (talk) 21:00, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

Yes all but the ones that should go on the new item for the enwiki sitelink. The statements with already deleted values can remain. --- Jura 10:50, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

@Jura1: It doesn't make any sense or you are not enough precise. This is item for "list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter" so where would you like to move ENWP link? And why only ENWP? There is PLWP link too so they both should be moved eventualy but there is no point in this. All what can be done here is to just move award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) to Basshunter (Q383541) and remove Q62098823 and Q66112460 or restore them. Eurohunter (talk) 14:47, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

The item is currently a conflation of a list and the item for artist.

Once deletion is decided, I will to the necessary changes and create the new item. --- Jura 15:12, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

@Jura1: But for this reason list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter (Q63384701) can't be deleted in any way - there is no point. If you want to move properties then use moveClaim.js. I have moved award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) to Basshunter (Q383541) so it is Fixed. Eurohunter (talk) 14:22, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

You forgot P18. It's still a conflation potentially misleading users, oddly listed as sample on Property:P2354. Once the split complete, it can be deleted. --- Jura 14:53, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

@Jura1: What do you mean about image (P18)? This is main image used for this item, ilustration of this list so what is wrong? See first random discographies I found for example Falco discography (Q10087), Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118), Texas discography (Q125194). What about has list (P2354)? President of the French Republic (Q191954) Wikimedia list related to this subject: list of presidents of France (Q29580) same as Basshunter (Q383541) Wikimedia list related to this subject: list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter (Q63384701), list of songs recorded by Basshunter (Q11761784), list of Basshunter live performances (Q6352124). "list related to this subject" right? What is wrong? Eurohunter (talk) 10:49, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

The discussion is about a list of awards. The illustration doesn't represent that. The image would more appropriately be on the item for the artist. No need to duplicate.

If there are other malformed lists about Basshunter, please fix them, but we don't need to discuss them here. --- Jura 10:59, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

I finished the split: Q110825249. --- Jura 11:21, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

@Jura1: First explain Falco discography (Q10087), Miranda Cosgrove discography (Q13118), Texas discography (Q125194) and thousands of other. This is image for infobox. What is the problem? This split was totally non-sense. Eurohunter (talk) 12:31, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

You split off most statements to the item for the artist, not me. I thought you understood that you have be conflating items. --- Jura 12:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

@Jura1: This is not any "conflation" in anyway. How even you got that idea? There is no any logic in this. How? You are trying to do something weird. This is single item for list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter. What is the problem again. Eurohunter (talk) 12:37, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

Please explain why you moved these statements from the item we are discussing here after it was listed for deletion. --- Jura 12:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

@Jura1: Maybe I miss understood you but you told that somehow award received (P166) and nominated for (P1411) are missleading so I thought you mean that they are dedicated for human (Q5) than Wikimedia list article (Q13406463) so I have moved them. Should I restore them? Eurohunter (talk) 12:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

No. They are clearly statements that go on items for humans (or other awardees) and not on items for a link to a Wikipedia list. This is why I consider that the item conflats two concepts. --- Jura 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

@Jura1: So yes it was a issue which was fixed now and this is the same item for list just it is fixed now and due to it isn't any conflation (this is not archive - and we don't need information about edit history in main space - we could say that). Eurohunter (talk) 13:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

As it was added as a sample item to has list (P2354), we should do full cleanup for conflation: i.e. split the content into clean items. Otherwise people may be using the incorrect item for the concept they thought they had been using.

If it wasn't a model item, we might have done differently. --- Jura 13:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

@Jura1: What do you mean? It was and it still is has list (P2354) so? There is some lists and they are has list (P2354) to each other. Isn't it how has list (P2354) works? Eurohunter (talk) 13:29, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

A sample list should be of high quality, otherwise people who use it as a model end up doing not so high quality things. --- Jura 13:32, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

• To summarize: The conflation Q63384701 was split into Q110825249 and Q383541. Only the enwiki sitelink needs to be moved to Q110825249. --- Jura 11:43, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
  • No. list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter (Q110825249) and list of awards and nominations received by Basshunter (Q63384701) are the same item. Eurohunter (talk) 21:43, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

Q105646031

Alexandre Gilbert (Q105646031): French art dealer: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Created by long-time cross-wiki vandal since 2008 (Albion~frwiki) Hyméros ^{--}-≽ ♥ Yes ?} 16:11, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 9 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 16:20, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

Q107614552

claim for restitution of an artwork (Q107614552): legal complaint: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

claim of restitution 1. would not be a complaint bit a lawsuit

and it is not notable because there is no need to use another subject than a lawsuit

no sitelinks

wrong using of property depicted by (P1299)

WD:N --Oursana (talk) 04:16, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 04:20, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

The links were all created by the creator of this subject about 6 month ago

see a famous legal law firm about restitution claim, we do not need a special claim for artwork https://www.allenovery.com/en-gb/global/news-and-insights/publications/restitution-claims--getting-your-own-back

https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?search=restitution+claim&search=restitution+claim&title=Special%3ASearch&go=Seite&ns0=1&ns120=1

claiming looted art regularly is following the Q17354266 outside the courts.

with all respect the whole complex is kind of spammed by one user. There is no controle by other users and there are many mistakes

we have already Q873642, Q2146005 with sitelinks which should be sufficient

--Oursana (talk) 04:31, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

 Delete. This is a particular kind of claim that in effect is a claim for conversion enabled by specific legislation. There's no good reason why this ought to be its own article. Ari T. Benchaim ^(talk) 00:45, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

Q110077452

Q110077452: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No notability discernible Gymnicus (talk) 08:54, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

 Delete for the reasons given above. Ari T. Benchaim ^(talk) 10:58, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

 Comment You recently nominated it at Wikidata:Requests_for_deletions/Archive/2022/02/01#Q110077452, any reason for the double nomination? Also: you, I, and the previous deletion-request-fulfiller discussed the item at user talk:BrokenSegue#Undeletion_request: Rachel Wil Sha Singh (Q110077452). To summarise, the way notability currently works is that it has a structural aspect across the sister projects, in addition to the usual method of notability whereby a subject is described / referred to by external sources. May I ask what your workflow is like for selecting items for deletion? Arlo Barnes (talk) 16:38, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

I restored the item. But I honestly am not convinced it shouldn't be deleted. BrokenSegue (talk) 22:11, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

I see, I didn't realise that. In my opinion, items should neither be created, nor deleted, nor undeleted unless there is conviction at the time that the action is appropriate. Luckily as a collaborative project we have public spaces such as these to discuss the merits of each action; I would like to make the case to you, Gymnicus, Ari, and anyone else who is interested that the item is useful and not against the policies of Wikidata. What are your misgivings? Arlo Barnes (talk) 22:58, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

I actually considered relisting the item here after undeleting it. I'm not sure it makes sense to allow an item for any arbitrary commons category. Commons categories appear to have no restrictions. I'm also not clear on what value this provides to commons (does that infobox matter?). I recognize I'm not super informed though. BrokenSegue (talk) 23:26, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

You are correct that Commons has a null notability policy; there is no 'lower limit' on notability, merely on 'educational potential'. However, there are other criteria by which categories there are considered, so they can go through deletion or reorganisation through the process known as COM:CFD. That detail aside, I understand the concern from Wikidatans about Commons sitelinks as far as 'notability-washing', but I think this danger is much ameliorated by the fact that both projects are volunteer-driven; although we have bots to help us, most contents are improved and judged by humans who can weigh the facts of the situation to decide if an inclusion is in good- or bad-faith (and more neutrally, is appropriate and useful). In this case we have a producer of free instructional comics and videos, which are included in (and some created for) Wikimedia projects such as Wikibooks. While this value remains valid even without Wikidata, it benefits from the advantage the project confers generally: being a wide-scoped linked semantic database. The specific application here is for the infobox, yes (which puts in one place information that may otherwise be duplicated in each project, compounding effort) but also Structured Data on Wikimedia Commons (Q43387741). Arlo Barnes (talk) 23:51, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 17:10, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

Q110499216

Q110499216: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notable? — Afeef (talk) 05:56, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

• Maybe. But I'm not sure if he's an actor in a proper way. Activist? --Wolverène (talk) 07:21, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

Q108103369

Gender bias and statistical fallacies, disinformation and mutual intelligibility (Q108103369): academic review in the Wikimedia Foundation's 'Recent Research' newsletter; also published in 'The Signpost', 25 July 2021: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Doesn't meet the notability policy. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 17:08, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

• Keep Meets the notability policy as a review of Ms. Categorized: Gender, notability, and inequality on Wikipedia (Q107357257). Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 17:47, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
• It would be interesting to have the details about the peer review of the original paper at Q107357257. --- Jura 20:31, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 22:10, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

 Keep seconding opinion above. --Middle river exports (talk) 16:44, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

Q110905509

Gonzague de Chantérac (Q110905509): French politician: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

WD:N Seem a candidate in a election at best. Fralambert (talk) 13:49, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 13:50, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

Q110863829

Q110863829: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

I see no use in this data object. Rather, the information should be built into the data object Szombathelyi Advent 2016 (Q110863832). Gymnicus (talk) 10:25, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 10:30, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

Q99701152

Gabi Guedes (Q99701152): musician: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Per WD:N Kacamata (talk) 20:20, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:30, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

Lexeme:L640116

invalid ID (L640116): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Не является идиомой, свободное сочетание слов. 4th-otaku (talk) 10:54, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

•  Comment Google translation says « Not an idiom, a free combination of words. » I'm not sure if it should be deleted or not... Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 14:32, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

Q10368271

Q10368271: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Per WD:N. Kacamata (talk) 02:54, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 21:10, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

Q7351948

Roberto Yong (Q7351948): basketball player and MMA athlete: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Per WD:N. Kacamata (talk) 00:18, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

 Info I didn't find anything about his basketball career, but I did find something about his career in mixed martial arts. Through this career he could well be notable for Wikidata. Something about his matches can be found here. --Gymnicus (talk) 11:33, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

Q61298033

Virginia Fonseca (Q61298033): Brazilian digital influencer: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Nothing useful about this article. And 0 Wiki languages linked to this article. --MrKDunleavy (talk) 14:18, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 5 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 14:20, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

 Keep structural need + tons of social followers suggest notability. BrokenSegue (talk) 20:53, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

Q111196995

Ola S1 (Q111196995): An Indian electric motorcycle: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

@Sanjay Murugasamy: Doesn’t seem to be notable: no sitelinks, no external identifiers, no internal links, no entity usage in Wikimedia projects. —Tacsipacsi (talk) 21:34, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Q18336849

Q18336849: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Item that is no longer needed because the properties for this type (P1963) property already exists. --Fantastoria (talk) 10:10, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 10:20, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

Q110505393

Q110505393: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability. — Afeef (talk) 18:14, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 18:20, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

Lexeme:L648280

invalid ID (L648280): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Не является идиомой, свободное сочетание слов. 4th-otaku (talk) 14:00, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

• Delete - both words can be used separately. --Wolverène (talk) 12:25, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

Q55178173

Q55178173: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs) This page was created by bot, the source being some kind of cultural property database (which was far from perfect, as I had way to see in the past). It is a duplicate of either Q55178186 or Q55178188, and can't be merged . --Syrio posso aiutare? 16:19, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

birth certificates

Q15268919

Paul Morand birth record (Q15268919): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

According to this topic --Nomen ad hoc (talk) 14:12, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 14:20, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

•  Keep See below. This link does not work to the actual certificate, please fix it. --RAN (talk) 17:31, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

Q111333077

Félix Roguet (1823-1888) birth record (Q111333077): The birth certificate of Félix Roguet: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

this topic Nomen ad hoc (talk) 14:14, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 14:20, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

•  Keep See below. This one is already linked to the actual image. --RAN (talk) 17:54, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

Q111336806

Henry-Léon Bulot (1820-1889) birth record (Q111336806): birth record: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

this topic Nomen ad hoc (talk) 14:15, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

•  Keep Keep if you can fix the link to the actual record, it only links to the start of the microfilm roll. --RAN (talk) 17:30, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:50, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Q111333170

Félix Roguet (1823-1888) death record (Q111333170): death record: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

this topic Nomen ad hoc (talk) 14:16, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 14:20, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

•  Keep I think if we upload the actual record to Commons and display it at the Wikidata entry we should keep these. Should we load every birth certificate from a country with a bot and create a Wikidata entry for it so that it is indexed and linked to the person? That is a decision to be made in the future, but I do not see why we can't have a few samples loaded by hand. There are an infinite amount of Q numbers available to use. Adding in scholarly article entries with DOI numbers was just as controversial at first, now we have over 10,000 entries. --RAN (talk) 17:30, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

Q111336807

Henry-Léon Bulot (1820-1889) death record (Q111336807): death record: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

this topic Nomen ad hoc (talk) 14:17, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 14:20, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

•  Keep See above. --RAN (talk) 17:54, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

•  Comment I'm on the fence, these certificates are borderline and we should have a broader discussion on where is the thresholds for such records. @Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ): having a file on Commons is a good clue but I'm not sure it's enough in itself to be acceptable on Wikidata. PS: why nominating only these 5 items when there is (at least) 26? qv. https://w.wiki/4$8B (some are used several times but most are only used on one item) we really need a more general talk on this subject. PPS: I merged these requests as they are similar. Cheers/Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 15:12, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
•  Comment +1 with VIGNERON here..., about a more general talk on this subject, and their use as source on only 1 element... --Hsarrazin (talk) 17:37, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

Q105816235

Q105816235: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no discernible notability Gymnicus (talk) 08:25, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:30, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

 Keep AntisocialRyan (Talk) 20:59, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

Q105817194

Q105817194: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no discernible notability Gymnicus (talk) 08:33, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 8 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:40, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

Bulk deletion request: Wikidata talks

First of several rounds of items without external notability created by Rdrg109, see Wikidata:Project_chat/Archive/2022/03#Queries_for_metadata_of_the_presentations_of_Wikidata_Data_Reuse_Days_2022 -- Emu (talk) 22:19, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

 Keep I created the item for the presentations because, from my perspective, they are notable according to the 2nd rule of WD:N (the rule is shown below and my reasoning is described further below)

It refers to an instance of a clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity. The entity must be notable, in the sense that it can be described using serious and publicly available references.

Are they clearly identifiable conceptual entities? Yes, the presentations are clearly identifiable conceptual entities because each of them have been described in a website that have been archived and saved in the relevant statements by using the property archive URL (P1065), so even if the website changes, the items will still be clearly identifiable conceptual entities. Thanks to the property described at URL (P973) and archive URL (P1065), these entities will be clearly identifiable as long as the Wayback Machine (Q648266) exists. With this query, you can confirm by yourself that all of these items have described at URL (P973) and archive URL (P1065).

Are the entities notable (in the sense that it can be described using serious and publicly available references? Yes, each of the presentations have been described in a website in https://diff.wikimedia.org which we can consider as a serious and publicly available reference (at least in the domain of Wikimedia events which is the classification of the items being discussed in this deletion request)

(please ping on reply) Rdrg109 (talk) 23:52, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

@Rdrg109 With all due respect, but self-published information of a medium-sized organization isn’t a serious source. We would never even consider accepting such items if they weren’t in the Wikimedia realm. But there is no reason to treat Wikimedia-related items any differently. --Emu (talk) 06:15, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

@Emu: When you say

We would never even consider accepting such items if they weren’t in the Wikimedia realm. But there is no reason to treat Wikimedia-related items any differently.

Do you also mean that Wikidata items shouldn't be created for presentations at conferences or events? Just as I did it with Wikidata Data Reuse Days 2022 (Q110886417), I'm planning to create Wikidata items for presentations in other conferences (e.g. Chaos Communication Camp 2019 (Q47777714), FrOSCon (Q56291516), Datenspuren (Q42676216), Python Conference (Q3411158), etc.), but, first, I want to make sure there's a clear consensus on the notability of these items, so that based on that, I start adding them or start raising awareness on the problem of conference presentations not being notable under the current notability guidelines.

I feel that just as conferences are valuable sources of information, so are the presentation in those conferences. Thankfully, some people have shared recordings of conference presentations on the Internet (e.g. media.ccc.de (Q80729951)) and by watching those recordings I've learnt relevant information on different areas of knowledge, so now I want to give back to the community by structuring and organizing that information on Wikidata.

Rdrg109 (talk) 17:24, 1 April 2022 (UTC)

@Rdrg109 I’m doubtful about the notability of individual presentations, but of course, I can’t speak for anybody else. While I do sympathize with the idea of querying presentations, my problem with this is twofold:

1. There are generally no external sources for those presentations (exceptions like the talks of David Kriesel (Q82042625) just prove the rule) so we are 100% dependent on the information of the conferences’ websites. This leads to
2. the problem that conferences could create notability out of thin air – and not only notability for individual presentations but also for the people that hold them, their topics, etc. Even if we limit ourselves to the most prestigious conferences (with the problem of determining them), this opens a big gateway for people who fancy an item for themself.

Maybe you should bring this up at WD:PC or WD:N’s talk page? --Emu (talk) 21:19, 1 April 2022 (UTC)

{{not done}}, needs wider discussion first. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 20:28, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

With all due respect, but the “wider discussion” would be needed to amend the notability guidelines to allow for those items, not to delete items without any clear reason for notability under the current regime. Especially as you have a history of trying to make every Wikimedia item notable. --Emu (talk) 07:39, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

Q109321792

Q109321792: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Is this YouTube video notable? Trade (talk) 00:13, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 00:20, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

Q111631911

Mount Kinukasa (Q111631911): mountain in Yokosuka, Kanagawa: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Al aangemaakt op Q11626404 トトト (talk) 07:02, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

@トトト One seems to be for the park, on for the hill the park is located on. Seems like two different concepts to me? --Emu (talk) 07:45, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

You are right. Q11626404 is a park on the mountain. So, if you think Q111631911 should be kept, I will maintain it as an item for the mountain.--トトト (talk) 17:20, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

{{not deleted}} per above. Tol (talk | contribs) @ 19:25, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

@Tol: Please let admins decide. --Emu (talk) 22:13, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

Sorry, @Emu. I thought this would be a case where the requester withdrew the request. Tol (talk | contribs) @ 22:14, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

@Tol I see. Well, let’s just have another admin decide just for clarity sake. I agree that this case is resolved. --Emu (talk) 22:17, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

@Emu: Alright; thanks for letting me know. Tol (talk | contribs) @ 22:18, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

Q109714048

Q109714048: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Along with Q111203439 and Q111588500: Notable? Haansn08 (talk) 13:55, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 14:00, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

Q108866753

Q108866753: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable P199 (talk) 21:02, 22 April 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 21:10, 22 April 2022 (UTC)

Q97976809

Q97976809: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Advert, no notability --2605:B100:12D:63E7:2966:EBF7:9A8D:497E 12:11, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 12:20, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

Q111700176

Anvitha Kollipara (Q111700176): entrepreneur: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable Ameisenigel (talk) 12:36, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

There's some coverage of this person:

• https://www.pointsoflight.org/awards/amid-covid-19-pandemic-teens-caregood-foundation-serves-most-vulnerable-from-young-to-old/
• https://www.edexlive.com/happening/2020/oct/14/this-14-year-old-from-hyderabad-is-helpinglight-up-the-homes-and-lives-of-rural-children-heres-ho-15205.html
• https://bookofachievers.com/articles/teens-foundation-cares-for-elderly-noble-act-indeed

Not sure how much of this is actually reliable. Tol (talk | contribs) @ 01:35, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Items created by 121.213.183.134 / 121.214.230.66 group IPs (shortened)

• former settlement (Q100961648): settlement that no longer exists, e.g. because it was abandoned, destroyed, abolished or it became part of another settlement: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
• history of black people (Q105069642): history of the racial and ethnic group who are of Sub-Saharan African descent.: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
• Q105840763: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
• history of indigenous peoples (Q105960891): ethnic history of indigenous groups: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
• history of World War II (Q106513510): aspect of history regarding the theatrical global war involving belligerents of the Allies and Axis powers from 1939 to 1945 making it the most deadliest conflict in human history: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
• Q106768970: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
• history of the Olympic Games (Q108056111): history of the Olympic competition of international sporting events from 776 B.C. onwards: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
• history of the Cold War (Q108312481): period of military history when it competed geopolitical tensions between the United States and the Soviet Union and their respective allies: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
• historical map (Q108525371): map displaying a past event or other historical situation; map that reflects historical phenomena and events and illustration of interdependence and social developments of the past and geographical factors: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
• culture of the Pacific Islands (Q108605239): pattern of human activity and symbolism associated with the Pacific Islands and its people: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
• culture of the Middle East (Q108693643): overview about culture in the Middle East: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
• English countryside (Q108933666): rural area of England: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
• Q111602197: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
• Via San Martino (Q111606296): street in Milan: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
• Q111606359: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
• Q111606882: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
• Q111608018: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
• Q111608120: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
• Q111608187: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
• Q111609173: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
• Q111609287: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
• Q111629756: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
• Q111630445: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
• Prato San Pietro (Q111630482): frazione of Cortenova, Italy: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
• Q111630653: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
• Q111630677: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
• Q111631540: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
• Q111633938: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
• Q111658931: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
• Q111667641: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
• Q111667696: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
• Q111667704: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
• Q111667796: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
• Q111667899: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
• Q111668040: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
• Q111668059: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
• Q111668090: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
• Q111668131: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
• German-Australian culture (Q66057623): culture of the German Australian people: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
• Malay culture (Q66753730): culture of the Malay people: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
• Q66800798: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
• adventure film character (Q66808903): film character appearing in adventure films: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
• 41st century (Q67037570): century: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
• Q67041504: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
• Christmas fiction (Q77762397): fiction genre: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
• memorial garden (Q84343482): garden planted in memory of people who have died or a tragic event, such as war: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
• post-independence India (Q92560624): period of Indian history: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
• Q94633308: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
• fantasy comedy film (Q95440291): film genre: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
• Q98456341: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
• fictional archaeological site (Q98582173): archaeological site that only exists in fiction: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

This is the remainder of items from this request, left here because they were linked to by at least one other item not from the same group of requested deletions. Mahir256 (talk) 03:37, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Thanks, @Mahir256! I'll take a look at these. Tol (talk | contribs) @ 03:40, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

(Link for myself: Wikidata:Requests for deletions/Archive/2022/04/25#Items created by 121.213.183.134 / 121.214.230.66 group IPs) Tol (talk | contribs) @ 14:46, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

@Mahir256: Alright; here are the ones which I think should be deleted:

• former settlement (Q100961648): only link is from another item created by the group
• Q105840763: links were bad statements added by group
• Q106768970: links are from other group items
• Q94633308: only link was bad; removed
• Q67041504: link is from group including former settlement (Q100961648) and Q109897770, which can be deleted too
• Q66800798: only link is bad
• Q98456341: links are bad

Some others are questionable, too, but they aren't actively harmful (many are borderline/questionably notable), and I'm tired of chasing this user. Thanks for your help. Tol (talk | contribs) @ 06:06, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

Q50391352

Q50391352: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Advert, no notability. --2605:B100:12D:63E7:4914:64FF:CAE8:FDFE 12:08, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 12:10, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Q109860504

Q109860504: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No notability --2605:B100:12D:63E7:4914:64FF:CAE8:FDFE 12:09, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Q105414251

Hermitcraft (Q105414251): whitelisted Minecraft SMP server: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Promo, not notable. --2605:B100:12D:63E7:4914:64FF:CAE8:FDFE 12:15, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 8 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 12:20, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

 Keep Not a promo, likely one of the largest Minecraft series/groups on the Internet. AntisocialRyan (Talk) 18:00, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Q108354302

Igor Vega (Q108354302): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Non relevant MiguelAlanCS (talk) 12:51, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 13:00, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Q108354310

Sandra Hernández (Q108354310): mother of Daniela Vega: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Non relevant MiguelAlanCS (talk) 12:54, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 13:00, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Q108053516

Beit Daras (Q108053516): Nahal settlement: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty --Yishaybg (talk) 15:11, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

 Oppose, it was a Nahal settlement (Q1962175) after Bayt Daras (Q2919976) was abandon due to 1948 Palestine War (Q49097). - yona b (talk) 07:40, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

Q111437354

Dobromiła Jaskot (Q111437354): Polish composer and pianist: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Self-advertisement. Maintained by user of the same name. Identifiers all messed up too. AntisocialRyan (Talk) 17:54, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Removed the faulty identifiers because they were putting warnings on other pages. AntisocialRyan (Talk) 17:55, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Q28911836

Amir Farmanesh (Q28911836): Social entrepreneur and public intellectual: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability Fatemi ♪ 13:17, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 13:20, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

IranPoll (Q28937009) links to this item in founded by (P112) and chief executive officer (P169) statements. Q3604202 (talk) 21:28, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

Q111656606

Q111656606: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. — Afeef (talk) 07:03, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

Q6100916

Q6100916: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

List article with only a redirected sitelink. Not the same as list of neighbourhoods of Istanbul (Q3720693) as that list can include instances of mahalle (Q17051044) that were not village in Turkey (Q1529096). Q3604202 (talk) 23:50, 1 May 2022 (UTC)

Q111820506

Q111820506: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Self-promotional for non-notable with no site links. [₂₄Cr][talk] 22:57, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

Q111827396

COLING 1984 (Q111827396): Proceedings COLING 1984: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Duplicate of Q111817800 --WolfgangFahl (talk) 08:39, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

One of the linked items appears to be proceedings of a 1984 conference, while the other other is a 1998 conference. These seem like distinct things, from their first revisions onward. If you are aware of items which are duplicates, you can merge them. Jamie7687 (talk) 18:35, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

@WolfgangFahl: Did I misunderstand something in my comment above? Do you have any additional thoughts? Or can this be marked as resolved? Jamie7687 (talk) 15:55, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

{{section resolved}} Jamie7687 (talk) 06:25, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Jamie7687, Template:Section resolved doesn't work here; I've wrapped it with nowiki. You're probably looking for Template:Not done. Tol (talk | contribs) @ 02:18, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

I have no clue what you are talking about WolfgangFahl (talk) 19:46, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

@WolfgangFahl: Let's start back at the beginning; it appears that you requested the deletion of COLING 1984 (Q111827396), saying that it is a duplicate of COLING 1998 (Q111817800). I responded that they appear to refer to different things ever since you first created them, and therefore that deleting (or merging) does not seem to be the right course of action. Do you agree with that, and therefore that this request can be closed? Thanks, Jamie7687 (talk) 22:21, 25 June 2022 (UTC)

Q111911753

Q111911753: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

The one extant use doesn't make sense as a reason for deprecation Swpb (talk) 15:18, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 15:20, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

Q111961239

Q111961239: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not a valid reason for deprecation Swpb (talk) 14:14, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 14:20, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

Why not? It it is just a more specific version of the reasons it is derived from, like identifier not suited for this item. The use case for it here was also based on widely known public reference material. In order for an identifier to be used for an item, it needs to be considered valid by reputable secondary sources. The example I first used this reason on is not considered valid by sources on the topic. (The SIL, who came up with the "jnj" code for the Yem language, is a Christian missionary organization, not a legitimate scholarly body.) --Middle river exports (talk) 16:22, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

@Middle river exports: Can you please give us the precise example where you used this?Vojtěch Dostál (talk) 06:31, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

Q75309469

Alison Jane Marno (Q75309469): (born 1958): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Invasion of my privacy --Sunday0805 (talk) 15:38, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 15:41, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

•  Delete --Wolverène (talk) 06:59, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Keep No private information, what is in the entry is info from Burke's Peerage and The Peerage. The same info is also available at Victoria Crosses on the Western Front (2017) which names her parents and birth year. --RAN (talk) 02:50, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

Q110915798

Q110915798: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Appears non-notable; identifiers show no publications nor much of anything else Jamie7687 (talk) 14:15, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 14:20, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

Q11631101

Q11631101: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

The entry is pointless and doesn't serve a purpose. --Adamant1 (talk) 06:04, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

 Comment It's a Wikimedia Commons Category for Designed postmarks called commemorative stamps used at Japanese post offices. A bot generated item. This could be further liked to the related items. It's not harmful to keep it, plus there is need of someone who connect it to related items. That's my opinion. - BeLucky (talk) 06:55, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

I might be wrong, but as far as I know a Wikidata entry can't be circular to be notable. If all it links to is itself/other Wikiprojects then I'd call that pointless and not worth keeping. That said, someone might be able to find a source discussing the topic and use it as a reference somehow. I looked but couldn't find any. Although admittedly I didn't do a super in-depth search. I actually have a book on the topic, but it's 99% pictures and I can't read Japanese. So I don't think it would be any help. Adamant1 (talk) 21:28, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

Q109557775

Q109557775: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability --2605:B100:B08:93FC:5147:A8D6:D0B8:7477 22:59, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 23:00, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

Q111937275

Q111937275: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Spam. — Afeef (talk) 04:58, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 05:00, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

Q112055954

Moussa Djouder (Q112055954): photographer: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notablity Rockpeterson (talk) 19:02, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 19:20, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

Q110731985

High (Q110731985): 2022 single by The Chainsmokers: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Q110731905 GryffindorD 17:07, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

• I don't know if there's a good reason to have these as separate items, but Q110731905 is the composition, Q110731970 is the recording, and Q110731985 is the single. I don't know if the demo version mentioned in the article is likely to be notable but it would be a separate recording of Q110731905; compilations would include Q110731970 as a track. For singles with only one track is a separate item necessary or could this be combined with Q110731970? Q3604202 (talk) 12:50, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Q6092711

Sivas High School (Q6092711): High school in Sivas, Turkey: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Kadı (talk) 19:54, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 4 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:00, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

•  Keep It's useful for statements in other items. Without this, the category Q32718438 could not be defined in structured data. Q3604202 (talk) 09:07, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Q109913990

Q109913990: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable ComeBacks (talk) 13:04, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 13:10, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

• This and Q109914006 link to each other; possibly also not notable. Q3604202 (talk) 13:18, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Q111608267

Q111608267: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable, Advertising, Social media promoting ComeBacks (talk) 13:08, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Q111557712

Q111557712: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable, Advertising ComeBacks (talk) 13:19, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Q111317928

Q111317928: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable, Advertising ComeBacks (talk) 13:22, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 13:30, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

• I removed the link from Q18713467 (an album with the same name as one of his books) but there is a sitelink, so the article would have to be deleted first. Q3604202 (talk) 13:42, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Bulk deletion request: All items created by KaustLibraryBot (talk • contribs • logs) on 2022-02-27

KaustLibraryBot (talk • contribs • logs) created batch of items on February 27th, but the bot messed up the titles of thesis and the authors themselves. The result are strange items with author of the thesis as "Label" and title of the thesis as "Description", with assigned ORCIDs of authors, causing various duplicates. As long as no bot operator is willing to fix the issue, I promote all these items to be deleted. List of edits could be found here. See also user's talk and Project chat — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 11:48, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

• the bot appears to be unapproved. should we ban them from main namespace? BrokenSegue (talk) 00:26, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
  • I would agree with blocking the bot from main namespace until it is approved. --Ameisenigel (talk) 14:39, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

Q112131672

Yash Moradiya (Q112131672): Yoga Instructor: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Fails WD:N Rockpeterson (talk) 19:33, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

is a world record sufficient? there does seem to be a bunch of low quality news about the person. BrokenSegue (talk) 23:10, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

Q112132057

Q112132057: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Self promotion Rockpeterson (talk) 19:39, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

 Keep JIMS Kalkaji institute is quite notable for its fame --KateChic (talk)

@KateChic: Do you have any sources in the sense of independent coverage? --Emu (talk) 23:22, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

Delete, promotional. Kadı Message 10:21, 28 June 2022 (UTC)

Q101228874

Q101228874: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable, PR. Kadı (talk) 20:57, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

Q108611374

Q108611374: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Pr. Kadı (talk) 20:43, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

This Turkish user is requesting deletion for all my items. Be aware and cautious there's not enough time frame between deletion requests to be able to do research about items if they're notable or not. Potential spam/personal issue. Also check this Wikipedia Deletion Request which he made a few days ago for my article. Clearly notable, not PR. Good try Kadı, not today ser :) Palaangelino (talk) 04:13, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Q99578516

Q99578516: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Pr. Kadı (talk) 20:55, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

This Turkish user is requesting deletion for all my items. Be aware and cautious there's not enough time frame between deletion requests to be able to do research about items if they're notable or not. Potential spam/personal issue. Also check this Wikipedia Deletion Request which he made a few days ago for my article. Clearly notable, not PR. Good try Kadı, not today ser :) Palaangelino (talk) 04:12, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Q98908281

Q98908281: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Pr. Kadı (talk) 20:58, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

This Turkish user is requesting deletion for all my items. Be aware and cautious there's not enough time frame between deletion requests to be able to do research about items if they're notable or not. Potential spam/personal issue. Also check this Wikipedia Deletion Request which he made a few days ago for my article. Clearly notable, not PR. Good try Kadı, not today ser :) Palaangelino (talk) 04:12, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Q99826742

Q99826742: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Pr. Kadı (talk) 21:00, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

This Turkish user is requesting deletion for all my items. Be aware and cautious there's not enough time frame between deletion requests to be able to do research about items if they're notable or not. Potential spam/personal issue. Also check this Wikipedia Deletion Request which he made a few days ago for my article. Clearly notable, not PR. Good try Kadı, not today ser :) Palaangelino (talk) 04:11, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Q107491350

Q107491350: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Pr. Kadı (talk) 20:14, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

This Turkish user is requesting deletion for all my items. Be aware and cautious there's not enough time frame between deletion requests to be able to do research about items if they're notable or not. Potential spam/personal issue. Also check this Wikipedia Deletion Request which he made a few days ago for my article. Clearly notable, not PR. Good try Kadı, not today ser :) Palaangelino (talk) 04:10, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Q107951152

Q107951152: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Pr. Kadı (talk) 20:16, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

This Turkish user is requesting deletion for all my items. Be aware and cautious there's not enough time frame between deletion requests to be able to do research about items if they're notable or not. Potential spam/personal issue. Also check this Wikipedia Deletion Request which he made a few days ago for my article. Clearly notable, not PR. Good try Kadı, not today ser :) Palaangelino (talk) 04:07, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Q107688738

Q107688738: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Pr. Kadı (talk) 20:16, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

This Turkish user is requesting deletion for all my items. Be aware and cautious there's not enough time frame between deletion requests to be able to do research about items if they're notable or not. Potential spam/personal issue. Also check this Wikipedia Deletion Request which he made a few days ago for my article. Clearly notable, not PR. Good try Kadı, not today ser :) Palaangelino (talk) 04:07, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

 Delete Found nothing in the Canadian medias about this artist except her social media account. Fralambert (talk) 20:36, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

Q104093755

Q104093755: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Pr. Kadı (talk) 20:22, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

This Turkish user is requesting deletion for all my items. Be aware and cautious there's not enough time frame between deletion requests to be able to do research about items if they're notable or not. Potential spam/personal issue. Also check this Wikipedia Deletion Request which he made a few days ago for my article. Clearly notable, not PR. Good try Kadı, not today ser :) Palaangelino (talk) 04:06, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Q62027762

Qixxit (Q62027762): Travel booking application, website: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Pr. Kadı (talk) 20:23, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

{{Deleted}} --DeltaBot (talk) 20:40, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

I reverted my deletion as someone made me remember that I keeped it a another time. Probably a another admin should check for it. --Fralambert (talk) 21:34, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

On July 12, 2021 and August 4, 2021 the data object was retained by Fralambert and Emu. --MKBler (talk) 22:05, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

On the topic itself, shouldn't the relevance come from the fact that the previous owner and operator of this app was Deutsche Bahn? --MKBler (talk) 22:11, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

@MKBler Not necessarily, DB doesn’t have the Midas touch that creates notability out of thin air (others do). But the WIWO and Connect articles should be enough for WD:N #2 notability. --Emu (talk) 23:10, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

@Emu: But there is the third point of the criteria of relevance. It says that a data object can become relevant if - let's call it - it is an added value for another relevant data object. In practice this means that when the relevant data object links to the affected data object. In this case, this would be possible from the data object of Deutsche Bahn to the data object of Qixxit using the property owner of (P1830). This statement can also be substantiated by the above-mentioned news articles. So the added value point should be fulfilled here, shouldn't it? --MKBler (talk) 09:21, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

@MKBler Hm, I’m not sure if owning something makes the owned thing notable. But this is a moot point anyway in this case – there is WD:N #2 notability in this case, as I saw it and continue to see it. --Emu (talk) 09:28, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

@Emu: Yes, I understand the objection. But this third point is also quite broad, I think. When does the third point generate relevance and when does it not? I think there's a lot of room for interpretation there. But as you say, in this case it's just a side job. The owner of Deutsche Bahn's relationship with Qixxit only shows that the data object is relevant in addition to the already existing sources. --MKBler (talk) 09:47, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

Q99898743

Q99898743: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Pr. Kadı (talk) 20:32, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

This Turkish user is requesting deletion for all my items. Be aware and cautious there's not enough time frame between deletion requests to be able to do research about items if they're notable or not. Potential spam/personal issue. Also check this Wikipedia Deletion Request which he made a few days ago for my article. Clearly notable, not PR. Good try Kadı, not today ser :) Palaangelino (talk) 04:05, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Q105262003

Q105262003: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Pr. Kadı Message 21:25, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

This Turkish user is requesting deletion for all my items. Be aware and cautious there's not enough time frame between deletion requests to be able to do research about items if they're notable or not. Potential spam/personal issue. Also check this Wikipedia Deletion Request which he made a few days ago for my article. Clearly notable, not PR. Good try Kadı, not today ser :) Palaangelino (talk) 04:04, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Q100350795

Q100350795: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Pr. Kadı Message 21:26, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 21:30, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

This Turkish user is requesting deletion for all my items. Be aware and cautious there's not enough time frame between deletion requests to be able to do research about items if they're notable or not. Potential spam/personal issue. Also check this Wikipedia Deletion Request which he made a few days ago for my article. Clearly notable, not PR. Good try Kadı, not today ser :) Palaangelino (talk) 04:03, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Q106776914

Claudia Valentina (Q106776914): British singer, songwriter: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Pr. Kadı Message 21:28, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 21:30, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

This Turkish user is requesting deletion for all my items. Be aware and cautious there's not enough time frame between deletion requests to be able to do research about items if they're notable or not. Potential spam/personal issue. Also check this Wikipedia Deletion Request which he made a few days ago for my article. Clearly notable, not PR. Good try Kadı, not today ser :) Palaangelino (talk) 04:02, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Q106746935

Q106746935: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Pr. Promotional Kadı Message 21:31, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

This Turkish user is requesting deletion for all my items. Be aware and cautious there's not enough time frame between deletion requests to be able to do research about items if they're notable or not. Potential spam/personal issue. Also check this Wikipedia Deletion Request which he made a few days ago for my article. Clearly notable, not PR. Good try Kadı, not today ser :) Palaangelino (talk) 04:02, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Q106381290

Q106381290: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Pr. Promotional Kadı Message 21:32, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

This Turkish user is requesting deletion for all my items. Be aware and cautious there's not enough time frame between deletion requests to be able to do research about items if they're notable or not. Potential spam/personal issue. Also check this Wikipedia Deletion Request which he made a few days ago for my article. Clearly notable, not PR. Good try Kadı, not today ser :) Palaangelino (talk) 04:01, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Q106672507

Q106672507: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Pr. Promotional Kadı Message 21:32, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

This Turkish user is requesting deletion for all my items. Be aware and cautious there's not enough time frame between deletion requests to be able to do research about items if they're notable or not. Potential spam/personal issue. Also check this Wikipedia Deletion Request which he made a few days ago for my article. Clearly notable, not PR. Good try Kadı, not today ser :) Palaangelino (talk) 04:00, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Q106672382

Q106672382: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Pr. Promotional Kadı Message 21:33, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

This Turkish user is requesting deletion for all my items. Be aware and cautious there's not enough time frame between deletion requests to be able to do research about items if they're notable or not. Potential spam/personal issue. Also check this Wikipedia Deletion Request which he made a few days ago for my article. Clearly notable, not PR. Good try Kadı, not today ser :) Palaangelino (talk) 04:00, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Q106672296

Q106672296: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Pr. Promotional Kadı Message 21:33, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

This Turkish user is requesting deletion for all my items. Be aware and cautious there's not enough time frame between deletion requests to be able to do research about items if they're notable or not. Potential spam/personal issue. Also check this Wikipedia Deletion Request which he made a few days ago for my article. Clearly notable, not PR. Good try Kadı, not today ser :) Palaangelino (talk) 03:59, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Q106477781

Q106477781: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Pr. Promotional Kadı Message 21:34, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

This Turkish user is requesting deletion for all my items. Be aware and cautious there's not enough time frame between deletion requests to be able to do research about items if they're notable or not. Potential spam/personal issue. Also check this Wikipedia Deletion Request which he made a few days ago for my article. Clearly notable, not PR. Good try Kadı, not today ser :) Palaangelino (talk) 03:58, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Q106671731

Q106671731: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Pr. Promotional Kadı Message 21:34, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

This Turkish user is requesting deletion for all my items. Be aware and cautious there's not enough time frame between deletion requests to be able to do research about items if they're notable or not. Potential spam/personal issue. Also check this Wikipedia Deletion Request which he made a few days ago for my article. Clearly notable, not PR. Good try Kadı, not today ser :) Palaangelino (talk) 03:58, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Q111260327

Q111260327: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Doubtful scholarly article. https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202203.0233/v2 says "This version is not peer-reviewed" আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 22:19, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 22:20, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

•  Keep We host articles from ArXiv.org and they are not peer reviewed either. --RAN (talk) 22:08, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

Q112173769

Q112173769: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Seems promotional Rockpeterson (talk) 16:06, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 09:30, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

Q110987929

James Andrew Lyttle (Q110987929): Irish-Canadian minister: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs | discussion)

Non-notable. This item was likely only created to support "keep" votes at Commons. P199 (talk) 14:00, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

•  Keep Wikidata doesn't go by Wikipedia standards of Notability. See Wikidata:Notability "can be described using serious and publicly available references." We have news articles on the person. We have their Findagrave entry with the info on the tombstone, we have their birth record from Familysearch. Dead people don't get involved in self-promotion, so that is not a problem either. --RAN (talk) 17:04, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

  Where do we have news articles about the person? Not in the data object. Anyone can get an entry at Findagrave, there are no relevance criteria. If a Findagrave listing is relevant, then every deceased person is relevant. The FamilySearch ID is also not relevant, and certainly not the link to the private Facebook group.  Delete --MKBler (talk) 09:14, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

• You seem to equate Wikidata:notability with some sort of fame, any dead person can be in Wikidata, since they "can be described using serious and publicly available references" and they are not involved in self-promotion, as I already wrote above. Any person named in a news article from a reliable source can have an entry in Wikidata. Any person named on a tombstone at Findagrave is within the project scope. Any person listed in a death registry found at Familysearch is also within the project scope, even if there is no consensus at this point in time to have a bot upload the entire database from any of these sources. The amount of work to disambiguate and merge would be staggering. It took a full year to match with existing entries, merge duplicates, and correct errors, in The Peerage database upload. --RAN (talk) 12:58, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 19:10, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

Q112226558

Q112226558: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Missing Notability and references --Sivizius (talk) 09:30, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 09:40, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

Q112167525

Q112167525: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notable? Trade (talk) 20:25, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

Q106559936

Q106559936: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

I do not want and never requested my name and personal data to appear on wikidata.  – The preceding unsigned comment was added by 79.69.139.32 (talk • contribs).

We do not need your permission to have an item for you here, but this item does not appear to pass our notability criteria. CC @Alain Schneider as original author. Bovlb (talk) 20:17, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

I had added this item while working on the list of INALCO people from the website. No personal data but only professional data already published online Alain Schneider (talk) 07:58, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Q108196939

Q108196939: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Lacks notability --2A04:CEC0:107A:6181:DD59:40AA:183D:E0EE 19:40, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

 Keep Just because you blanked the item. Fralambert (talk) 23:06, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Since they continued their blanking I semiprotected this item. Fralambert (talk) 22:13, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 01:20, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

That said, despite her notable sister, I don't believe that this individual meets Wikidata criteria for inclusion. DS (talk) 15:34, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

 Keep Notable doesn't mean famous, just being able to be described by a reliable source. --RAN (talk) 14:29, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

Q106612420

Q106612420: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Non-notable, repeat self-promoter on English Wikipedia (w:en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Salah Eddine Saadouni) Lord Belbury (talk) 14:49, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 14:50, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

@Lord Belbury: You should ask for simple:Salah Eddine Saadouni to be deleted first. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 14:59, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

Okay, deletion requested. --Lord Belbury (talk) 15:07, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

@Mike Peel: It was deleted a couple of weeks ago. --Lord Belbury (talk) 14:36, 2 July 2022 (UTC)

@Lord Belbury: It now seems to be used in Q111226381 - so maybe a structural need? Was going to delete before I saw that though, what do you think? Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 18:47, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

@Mike Peel: It's an LTA on the English Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Asaidmanar/Archive) who has also created a deleted Creepy Night article. The Arabic Wikipedia article is a couple of days old and there's no main bio article, so they're probably deleting his stuff over there as well. Don't know what Wikidata's normal approach to this kind of repeat-creation-deletion spammer cycle is, will leave it up to you. --Lord Belbury (talk) 18:54, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

@Lord Belbury: Ah, I see, let's see what happens with the Arabic article, and potentially just delete the lot if that's deleted. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 18:56, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

@Mike Peel: Correction, I misread the dates on the Arabic article, it's been around for a month, albeit with just bot and IP edits. And the account that created it there is globally locked as a sock of Asaidmanar (https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:CentralAuth/Worldwide01). --Lord Belbury (talk) 19:01, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

Q30066282

Irina Getmanenko (Q30066282): Russian feldsher: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No notability (just someone's mother). --Андрей Романенко (talk) 16:21, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 16:30, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

Q95821571

Q95821571: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Self-promotion for non-notable individual Trivialist (talk) 02:58, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 3 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 03:00, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

Q111050965

Q111050965: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not significant --Артём 13327 (talk) 07:16, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

Q107290947

Leslie Wolf (Q107290947): wife of Tim McElroy: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

A person of no notability. --Андрей Романенко (talk) 20:40, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 8 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:50, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

•  Keep Structural need. --RAN (talk) 04:03, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
  • What is "structural need"? Do we need an item for anybody's mother? Андрей Романенко (talk) 12:37, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

    @Андрей Романенко Structural need is our third criterion of WD:N, this mean you can create a item about a author because you have already a item about is book and you need it to say that they are the author. This item may violate WD:BLP, but this is hard to say because all the sources are behind a paywall. Fralambert (talk) 20:58, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

    • I know what is usually meant at WD by "structural need". In this case the only reason for this item to exist is that this person is someone's relative, as far as a certain person had created a dozen of items for people that allegedly are his ancestors. I believe this is not the structural need in WD sense. Андрей Романенко (talk) 21:48, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
• We don't really need every single Wikidata entry, anymore than I need every word in a dictionary. Yet, there they are. You keep trying to apply Wikipedia notability rules to Wikidata, at Wikipedia you have to be famous, here you just need to be able to be described by a reliable source. --RAN (talk) 05:55, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
  • The only source provided in this item tells about this person the following: “Leslie and her husband Tim are both graduates of St. Teresa High School. They have two boys that have also graduated from St. Teresa. Leslie has been a long time supporter of the school and the Decatur Catholic community.” That is all. I am challenging the idea that this is enough to consider this person “being described.” Андрей Романенко (talk) 18:05, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Some people are only important for structural reasons, they connect generations in our family_tree function. Of course for living people we limit how much information we store on them, we fill in more info when they die. Most of the information in her entry is her relationships, that info comes from the obituary of her father. --RAN (talk) 02:02, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

Q107290974

Tim McElroy (Q107290974): American firefighter: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

A person of no notability. --Андрей Романенко (talk) 20:43, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 8 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:50, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

•  Keep Valid identifiers and structural need. Multiple news articles. --RAN (talk) 04:03, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
  • Do you really think this can qualify for "being described in reliable sources"? Андрей Романенко (talk) 13:00, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
• It confirms he was Deputy Fire Chief of Hinsdale, it gives both the year he started and the year he ended that position, and confirms the name of his spouse. If you think that Hinsdalean (Q55666525) is an unreliable source, and giving hoax information, work to get it on the blacklist. Many websites are unreliable and on the blacklist. If you get it on the blacklist, a bot will delete the reference. --RAN (talk) 06:00, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
  • I am not challenging reliability of this newspaper. I am challenging the idea that “being described” means this kind of publications. Андрей Романенко (talk) 18:07, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

Wikidata isn't a prose project like Wikipedia, we are not writing a biography, it is just data points, about a dozen to describe each person so that they are uniquely disambiguated. It really is just an index of people and places and things. The best place to change the Wikidata notability guideline so it more closely resembles English Wikipedia would be at its talk page, instead of ad hoc deletion of entries you don't like. --RAN (talk) 01:58, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

Q107291515

Connor McElroy (Q107291515): American lawyer: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

A person of no notability. --Андрей Романенко (talk) 20:44, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 4 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:50, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

•  Keep Structural need. --RAN (talk) 04:03, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

Q107291489

Anne Elizabeth McElroy (Q107291489): Chief of Labor Relations for the Illinois Department of Corrections: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

A person of no notability. --Андрей Романенко (talk) 20:45, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 7 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:50, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

•  Keep Valid identifiers and structural need. Wikipedia notability does not apply here. --RAN (talk) 03:30, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

Q107291485

Lynn Tuttle (Q107291485): wife of Mike McElroy: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

A person of no notability. --Андрей Романенко (talk) 20:47, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:50, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

•  Keep structural need. --RAN (talk) 04:41, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

Q107291182

Elizabeth Anne Kleckner (Q107291182): (1930-2011): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

A person of no notability. --Андрей Романенко (talk) 20:47, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 7 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:50, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

•  Keep structural need. --RAN (talk) 04:37, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

Q107291556

Patrick McElroy (Q107291556): Mike McElroy's brother: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

A person of no notability. --Андрей Романенко (talk) 20:48, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:50, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

•  Keep Structural need. --RAN (talk) 04:04, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

Q107291500

Richard D. McElroy (Q107291500): (1927-1996) husband of Elizabeth Anne Kleckner: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

A person of no notability. --Андрей Романенко (talk) 20:49, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 6 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:50, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

•  Keep Valid identifiers and structural need. --RAN (talk) 03:57, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

Q107291945

Mary Wolf (Q107291945): Raymond T. Wolf's daughter: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

A person of no notability. --Андрей Романенко (talk) 20:50, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 6 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 21:00, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

•  Keep Structural need. --RAN (talk) 04:04, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

Q107297872

Ella W. Wolf (Q107297872): (1916-1987): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

A person of no notability. --Андрей Романенко (talk) 20:52, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 4 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 21:00, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

•  Keep structural need, Wikipedia notability does not apply. --RAN (talk) 04:34, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

Q107297869

Mildred A. Harnish (Q107297869): wife of Theodore Herman Wolf: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

A person of no notability. --Андрей Романенко (talk) 20:52, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 3 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 21:00, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

•  Keep structural need. --RAN (talk) 04:35, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

Q107297904

Gertrude A. Wolf (Q107297904): (1917-2020) husband of Raymond Leesman: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

A person of no notability. --Андрей Романенко (talk) 20:53, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 4 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 21:00, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

•  Keep Valid identifiers and structural need, no valid reason for deletion, Wikidata:notability is not about fame. --RAN (talk) 03:49, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

Q107218828

Raymond Theodore Wolf (Q107218828): (1929-2011) American mechanical engineer: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

A person of no notability. --Андрей Романенко (talk) 20:54, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 21:00, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

•  Keep structural need and can be described from reliable sources. --RAN (talk) 03:50, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
  • Where are these reliable sources? Андрей Романенко (talk) 12:44, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
• They are listed in his Wikidata entry, did you even look? He has a full obituary and linked to multiple documents at Familysearch. --RAN (talk) 17:23, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
  • Do you mean anybody with the death record at legacy.com must have an item at WD? Андрей Романенко (talk) 21:51, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
• Not must have, but is eligible to have an entry. This is not English Wikipedia notability rules. We can upload the entire Legacy.com index and give every single person an entry, because now they can be described using serious and publicly available references. There is no current plan to do so, because no one has scraped a copy of their index. Is your argument that Legacy.com is not serious or is not public, which is it? If it is not serious, is it comical? I didn't laugh even once reading the obituary. --RAN (talk) 23:17, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
  • Again and again: I don't believe that this text can qualify as satisfactory description of a person, however reliable and serious it would be. I believe being described using serious and publicly available references implies much more elaborated description. Андрей Романенко (talk) 18:15, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
• If you find that references need to be more "elaborate" than an obituary, then the best place to make your argument would be at Wikidata:Notability. We have a dozen statements made in each entry for instance_of=human and almost every one of them can be sourced from an obituary. I think that you are trying to force the English Wikipedia definition of notability to Wikidata. Wikipedia requires some sort of fame, Wikidata only requires a publicly-available, reliable-source, or reliable-sources, that can supply the data needed to fill in the statements. --RAN (talk) 01:16, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

Q107291969

Theodore Herman Wolf (Q107291969): (1889-1963): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Probable fake. --Андрей Романенко (talk) 21:04, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 7 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 21:20, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

•  Keep Wikidata:Notability ≠ "being famous", just being able to be described with info from reliable sources. --RAN (talk) 22:38, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
  • Where are these reliable sources? Андрей Романенко (talk) 12:52, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
• The identifiers are listed and we link to his obituary, Wikidata is not about fame. Wikidata only cares that they are real people, that can be described from reliable sources, and not involved in self promotion. --RAN (talk) 23:21, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

Q107291949

Harry Eugene Flynn (Q107291949): American engineer: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

A person of no notability. --Андрей Романенко (talk) 21:05, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 21:20, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

•  Keep A holder of a number of patents, there are several projects attempting to identify all authors of scientific papers and patent holders. --RAN (talk) 03:11, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

Q107297988

Louise Sturhan (Q107297988): wife of Augustus Bernard Wolf: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

A person of no notability. --Андрей Романенко (talk) 21:09, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 3 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 21:20, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

•  Keep described using reliable sources and a structural need. --RAN (talk) 01:30, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

Q107340578

Henrietta Hoepfner (Q107340578): (1823-1906) wife of August Wolf: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

A person of no notability. --Андрей Романенко (talk) 21:12, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 21:20, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

•  Keep Wikidata:Notability ≠ "being famous", just being able to be described with info from reliable sources. --RAN (talk) 22:37, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

Q107340552

August Wolf (Q107340552): (1823-1905) German American justice of the peace: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Probable fake. --Андрей Романенко (talk) 21:15, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 3 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 21:20, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

•  Keep Wikidata:Notability ≠ "being famous", just being able to be described with info from reliable sources. --RAN (talk) 22:37, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

Q107297915

August Bernard Wolf (Q107297915): (1854-1929) American farmer: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Probable fake. --Андрей Романенко (talk) 21:41, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 5 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 21:50, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

•  Keep Wikidata:Notability ≠ "being famous", the person just needs to be described with info from reliable sources. All the incorrect information has been removed. --RAN (talk) 22:39, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
  • Where are these reliable sources describing this person? Андрей Романенко (talk) 12:34, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
• If you can't see the three Identifiers and the category containing the two obituaries, maybe leave the deletion nominations to others. If we delete this entry it will leave behind the mirrored versions of the now deleted Wikipedia biography containing false information on this person, claiming they were a politician. The Wikidata entry contains all the true and verified information and deprecates the bad info. Multiple copies of the false information are online and will remain online. --RAN (talk) 05:48, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Q108130039

Frederick Wolf (Q108130039): (1825-1887) German American farmer: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No sources, no notability. --Андрей Романенко (talk) 21:50, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 22:00, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

•  Keep Wikidata:Notability ≠ "being famous", just being able to be described with info from reliable sources. --RAN (talk) 22:37, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

Q108144567

Bernhard Wolf (Q108144567): (1884-1968): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Probable fake. --Андрей Романенко (talk) 21:52, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 5 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 22:00, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

•  Keep Real person per the Identifiers, the doubt is whether they were a politician, which appears to have been fabricated. If we delete the information here, it will only leave the potentially-false information online in our mirrors and scraping websites. In the Wikidata entry we link to their verified and sourced information at Familysearch and Findagrave. --RAN (talk) 22:34, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

Q18342272

North Walsham Town FC (Q18342272): UK association football club: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

NO information at all Bahnmoeller (talk) 22:45, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 22:50, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

Q112505052

Q112505052: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable Thingofme (talk) 14:17, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

 Keep This organisation seem to have some notability in Italy [7], [8]. Fralambert (talk) 23:44, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Bulk deletion request: Problematic entries by (semi-spammer) IP

Entries created either without any hint of meeting the notability policy, or perhaps even products of fiction in some cases. —— Chalk19 (talk) 14:21, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Q111836983

sandwich (Q111836983): two pieces of sliced baked bread with filling in between them; not to be confused with Q28803 (the broader sense of "sandwich"): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Original research —— Eric Liu_（Talk） 09:04, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 09:05, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

•  Keep
  1. 建立这个数据项的起因是中文三明治与英文sandwich在概念外延上存在一般中文用户无法接受的差异，甚至当中文维基百科管理员Tiger听到肉夹馍割包驴肉火烧属于sandwich的子分类时反应都是“直接把这些子分类标签移除就行了”。但我不能移除，因为在英语的定义中它们确属fillings sandwiched in any kind of bread，为尊重英语世界的sandwich只得将汉语的三明治条目剥离分家了。
  2. glwiki有用户主动将他们的三明治条目置入这个狭义三明治数据项中，被Eric Liu先生未具理由回退。
  3. 目前这个差异正在中文维基百科中讨论。Eric Liu先生只给出了一句“有什么可讨论的，sandwich不就是三明治吗？”之类的话，并未深入到概念外延、范畴的讨论中来。--173.68.165.114 10:00, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

 Keep I'm not sure if "sandwich proper" is an appropriate term, but "sandwich" is a fuzzy concept with different meanings (see en:Fuzzy concept#Sandwich example). The English Wikipedia article en:Sandwich also describes "sandwich" in both a narrower and a broader sense. As each Wikidata item should represent "a clearly identifiable concept or object", it does make sense to split sandwich (Q28803).--Stevenliuyi (talk) 01:24, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

I have changed the descriptions of sandwich (Q111836983) and sandwich (Q28803) to clarify the distinction. Also, further research indicates that "sandwich proper" is not a common term, therefore I have replaced it to "sandwich." Note that items do not need to have different labels as they do on Wikipedias. They can both be labeled "sandwich" as long as the descriptions are distinct enough to disambiguate them.--Stevenliuyi (talk) 05:18, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

 Keep AntisocialRyan (Talk) 02:29, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

Q70923673

(±)-limonene (Q70923673): chemical compound: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Equivalent to (±)-limonene (Q278809), see https://commonchemistry.cas.org/detail?cas_rn=138-86-3. Leyo 14:28, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 4 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 14:30, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

EN Wiki says “Racemic limonene is known as dipentene,” which suggests that they are not the same, but dipentene is a subclass. I don’t feel strongly either way and will defer to a chemistry expert. PKM (talk) 01:35, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

If it is an equivalent it should be merged, not deleted. --Ameisenigel (talk) 15:31, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

Q107111354

Dorothy Joan Wolf (Q107111354): (1929-2012) American business executive: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No notability. --Андрей Романенко (talk) 17:59, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 18:00, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

•  Keep You are still nominating these with no other support for the previous batch. The entry has both a structural need and can be described using reliable and public references. --RAN (talk) 01:59, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

Q112407121

Q112407121: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

@Wasiurrahman2: Doesn’t seem to be notable: no sitelinks, no independent external identifiers, no internal links, no entity usage in Wikimedia projects. —Tacsipacsi (talk) 18:17, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

Q106435410

Eve Rothlo (Q106435410): A character on 'How to Get Away with Murder'.: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty FMSky (talk) 09:04, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 09:10, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

This item is definetely not empty. --Ameisenigel (talk) 15:33, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

Q112362274

Louis Weber (Q112362274): American businessman (1859–1930): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No notability is apparent to me MKBler (talk) 11:29, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

• Seems that either the person who was buried there, or that one who made the gravestone (if even known) are not notable. The Commons category contains only one file. I don't see a sense in the item too. --Wolverène (talk) 05:12, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
  • However, it will probably be recreated by bot - [9]. --Wolverène (talk) 05:14, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

    It was created by bot in the first place. Fralambert (talk) 18:09, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

    @Wolverène: Why can a bot create non-notable data objects? This bug should be fixed from my point of view. --MKBler (talk) 15:10, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

    The item is created by a bot (as well as the local category), and the infobox for the grave was added by a bot too. Not a bug, that's just how bots work so I see a risk of automatic recreation even if the item will be deleted together with the removal of the Commons infobox. --Wolverène (talk) 07:17, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

•  Keep and convert to "Louis Edward Weber (1859-1930)". We usually only have an entry for a grave if it has multiple people buried there. Like Findagrave we should have an entry for the person and display the image of the grave. --RAN (talk) 02:07, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

  Well, who was Louis Edward Weber? --Wolverène (talk) 07:17, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

  • I don't think it matters, so long as he can be described by a reliable source, and a tombstone is a reliable source. At some point we will import all of Findagrave. --RAN (talk) 22:42, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

Q112584036 "Brooke Clarke"

Q112584036: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Doesn't meet Wikidata:Notability Johannnes89 (talk) 19:41, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

@Johannes89: Please give me a little bit more time. I've just created the item at 18:52. Brooke Clarke's website PRC68

• is cited 18-times in enwp
• authoritative information about military radios since 20 years
  • e.g. only public information about SINCGARS (Q1139372) on the web

I am German and not affiliated to him.--Riesenkakerlak (talk) 19:49, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

@Riesenkakerlak: How long do you need to add information to this item? --Ameisenigel (talk) 09:21, 20 June 2022 (UTC)

Q76171984

Q76171984: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Per notability policy Jan Myšák (talk) 20:21, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:30, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

•  Keep Valid Peerage entry. --RAN (talk) 21:40, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

Q75332391

Charles Humphrey Scott-Plummer (Q75332391): (born 1972): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Per notability policy Jan Myšák (talk) 20:22, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 6 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:30, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

•  Keep Valid Peerage entry. --RAN (talk) 06:20, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

Q109408289

Siege of Borovsk Monastery of St. Paphnutius (Q109408289): 1610 short siege and capture of the monastery during the Time of Troubles: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs | discussion)

Hoax, see https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&logid=132715509 Shizhao (talk) 08:14, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:20, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

 Keep well-known event of Russian history. I've fixed some errors.--Nicoljaus (talk) 09:04, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

•  Delete I found absolutely nothing on this alleged siege. It seems to me it is a hoax. There is not even a Russian article. No WProject element is currently linked to this item. Veverve (talk) 18:03, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
•  Delete Have a look at the write-up on enwiki and the relevant AN message as well. Also see WD:PC.CrystalLemonade (talk) 20:54, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
• Here's some information from the site of the monastery, and here's some article (written by an alumnus of the Kaluga Orthodox theological college, I don't know if you consider this a valuable publication). Probably not a hoax, anyway, the Time of Troubles affected the area around Borovsk and, in particular, that time it was under control of the Polish interventionists and by False Dmitry II, so a local monastery should've been under attacks. In the other hand, I am not sure if a siege of that monastery was an outstanding event, something like this could happened pretty much elsewhere. --Wolverène (talk) 05:09, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
  • Also, the event is 'googleable'... Anyway, you may try to ask here or here, however both projects aren't very active, surprisingly. --Wolverène (talk) 05:27, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Q96031348

Q96031348: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Pr. Deleted in various wikis. Kadı Message 09:21, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

Q76374919

unknown daughter Dewar (Q76374919): Peerage person ID=720746: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

"daugher of" somebody else, nothing else known → notability --Casualty Affairs Officer (talk) 10:24, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 10:30, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

Yes, you can see this here.--Casualty Affairs Officer (talk) 12:20, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

Notability criterion 3. It fulfills a structural need by enhancing the information available on the linked items. As this is an item created by an import of The Peerage, it probably needs a broader debate on whether we retain or delete these entries. Previous discussions have resulted in no consensus to delete. While it is a noble goal for you to try to resolve this thorny issue in your first 24 hours on the project, if you lack the consensus on excluding certain items from the Peerage, another user will just restore the item again with another data import in a few months. From Hill To Shore (talk) 23:56, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

•  Keep structural need, we need these unnamed people to complete a family tree. --RAN (talk) 02:05, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

Q1760529

Q1760529: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

The two items of other WProjects were deleted (see here and here) for lack of notability. The identifiers are misleading: they are about the expression "Old Catholic Church + America" and concern the general history of Old Catholicism in America, the Polish National Catholic Church, the Western Orthodox Catholic Church, etc.; there is no mention of the subject of the item ('Old (Roman) Catholic Church of America') within the identifiers linked to it. --Veverve (talk) 20:33, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

Q112660507

Q112660507: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Spam Rockpeterson (talk) 13:26, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 13:30, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

Q97309629

Make Lists, Not War (Q97309629): website that aggregates best-of lists: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No notability, private website, not fitting for references --Charlotte Heineccius (talk) 23:28, 22 June 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 23:30, 22 June 2022 (UTC)

Q112675097

Manish Yadav (Q112675097): Politician , Social Worker and Of Shri Krishna Janmabhoomi: Main Parties: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable Bodhisattwa (talk) 13:02, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

He is very Highly Trending and viral Person in News

https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/mathura-hindu-army-arrested-stir-krishna-janmabhumi-1724265-2020-09-22 Djclown2022 (talk) 11:36, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

 Keep Manish Yadav (Q112675097) - This is Notable Profile , Please get in google news , more then 100 Google News nomination this guys , This Person seem to have notability in India

https://www.aajtak.in/india/uttar-pradesh/story/mathura-krishna-janmabhoomi-case-manish-yadav-who-claims-to-be-a-direct-descendant-of-lord-krishna-ntc-1471249-2022-05-27

https://www.amarujala.com/uttar-pradesh/agra/shri-krishna-janmabhoomi-case-manish-yadav-gave-an-application-in-court-know-what-demand

https://www.siasat.com/krishna-janmabhoomi-eidgah-case-hcs-order-submitted-in-local-court-2334257/

https://www.outlookindia.com/national/mathura-case-application-filed-for-status-quo-on-mosque-premises-in-krishna-janmabhoomi-shahi-idgah-dispute-case-news-198947

https://english.newstracklive.com/news/he-had-been-leading-the-stir-concerning-this-matter-which-has-attracted-huge-attention-of-late-sc1-nu322-ta322-1232086-1.html

https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/mathura-temple-mosque-row-fresh-suit-admitted/article65464683.ece Djclown2022 (talk) 11:43, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

 Keep Manish Yadav is very famous and lot of news articles are there in google Djclown2022 (talk) 21:31, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

{keep} Politician , Social Worker and Of Shri Krishna Janmabhoomi: Main Parties

https://www.abplive.com/videos/states/mathura-manish-yadav-the-main-party-in-the-shri-krishna-janmabhoomi-case-filed-the-order-this-is-the-whole-matter-2130430

https://www.aajtak.in/india/uttar-pradesh/story/mathura-krishna-janmabhoomi-case-manish-yadav-who-claims-to-be-a-direct-descendant-of-lord-krishna-ntc-1471249-2022-05-27

https://www.jansatta.com/rajya/uttar-pradesh/hindu-army-leader-said-on-shahi-idgah-masjid-should-be-removed-from-near-janmabhoomi/2169203/

https://www.siasat.com/krishna-janmabhoomi-eidgah-case-hcs-order-submitted-in-local-court-2334257/

https://www.abplive.com/videos/states/srikrishna-janmbhoomi-sri-krishna-janmboomi-land-row-mathura-civil-court-2132814 Djclown2022 (talk) 20:55, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

Q112370208

Nefeli Fasouli (Q112370208): Greek musical artist: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notable? Haansn08 (talk) 16:40, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

•  Keep Valid identifiers.

Q107582752

Marsuki A. Laeni (Q107582752): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

The same reason stated above Azmi1995 (talk) 23:21, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

•  Keep Valid author with VIAF and LCCN entries. --RAN (talk) 04:47, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

Q112742832

Nikolaos Vernezos (Q112742832): Greek Orthadox priest (1978-2021): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable, recreation of a recently deleted item. --C messier (talk) 09:45, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

 Keep Notable etc. Matlin (talk) 15:32, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

Q112598192

Q112598192: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Non-notable musician, no linked articles Lord Belbury (talk) 12:13, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

 Keep Several external id's. Matlin (talk) 15:27, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

It's all social media, isn't it? He has one song on Spotify with zero listens. These don't seem like "serious and publicly available references". --Lord Belbury (talk) 14:39, 2 July 2022 (UTC)

 Delete Created by an account which hasn't contributed anything else. Likely self-promo. AntisocialRyan (Talk) 23:29, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

Q111601766

Q111601766: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

A person of no notability. --Андрей Романенко (talk) 00:58, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 01:00, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

Q106484579

Alekh Kumar Parida (Q106484579): Indian actor: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Promotional and non notable --Bilalahmed2022 (talk) 05:41, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 4 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 05:50, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

Q96207580

Julian Hosp (Q96207580): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Privacy concerns --Jan Hafner (talk) 13:18, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

•  Keep I don't see any information that can't be sourced from their public Linkedin entry and their own website. --RAN (talk) 14:11, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

 Comment For more context, see commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Julian Hosp.jpg. Bovlb (talk) 15:00, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

Q112536646

Q112536646: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Junk item for a non-notable person with no known name --Gamaliel (talk) 13:40, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 13:50, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

Q112652652

Q112652652: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

(Soon to be) Unused. NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh 14:12, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

Q108492292

EverybodyWiki (Q108492292): inclusionist online encyclopedia: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs | discussion)

Another copy of Wikipedia deleted articles --202.129.210.67 14:31, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 14:40, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

Is that a valid deletion reason? AntisocialRyan (Talk) 23:27, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

Q67578939 + Q108259252

• Q67578939: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
• Q108259252: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Seems not to be notable: repeatedly deleted on cswiki as non-notable; the subject himself repeatedly comes, changes all pseudonyms, etc. (see history). The deletion would probably be the best for everybody. Mormegil (talk) 15:07, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 9 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 15:10, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

 Delete Q67578939. All the photos of the self-proclaimed singer Dalibor Hřebíček (Q67578939) has been deleted (self promotion). The Category:Dalibor Hřebíček is empty. --Nemracc (talk) 22:37, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

PS: On https://cs.wikipedia.org/ the article has already been deleted 4 times. The Category on Commons has been deleted.--Nemracc (talk) 13:21, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

Edit group QSv2/90833

Please delete, created in error.Battleofalma (talk) 15:08, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

The whole batch? Ymblanter (talk) 19:07, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

Q112837105 and Q112838334

Q112837105: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs) and Q112838334: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Covered by Q112838700 (volumes hereof) --Poul G (talk) 07:07, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Q112786354

Q112786354: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Self-promotion, not notable --JustAnotherArchivist (talk) 01:49, 2 July 2022 (UTC)

Q112896563

The Catholic Church Has Paid Nearly $4 Billion Over Sexual Abuse Claims, Group says (Q112896563): news article, event: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

The item does not meet any of the three wikidata:notability criteria. Veverve (talk) 11:41, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 11:50, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

This item, which is a news article from a credible source (Newsweek) about $4 billion in payments for Sexual Abuse claims meets ALL notability criteria. It is contrary to Wikidata policy to delete valid and important information because Veverve dislikes it. The Catholic Church does not get to determine which well documented events get censored. LAP959 (talk) 13:05, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

•  Keep reliably sourced. --RAN (talk) 04:18, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

Q112845541

Q112845541: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Yahya (talk) 22:42, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

The user's selfies were already deleted on Commons --> met the criteria for speedy deletion.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Jahid_Hossain_Pinkel_Photography.jpg

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%E0%A6%9C%E0%A6%BE%E0%A6%B9%E0%A6%BF%E0%A6%A6_%E0%A6%B9%E0%A7%8B%E0%A6%B8%E0%A6%BE%E0%A6%87%E0%A6%A8_%E0%A6%AA%E0%A6%BF%E0%A6%82%E0%A6%95%E0%A7%87%E0%A6%B2.jpg --Nemracc (talk) 13:40, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

Q112921127

Rottorfer Weg (Q112921127): street: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Ist eine Überkategorie F. Riedelio • talk 09:34, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

Q112959074

Lorenzo Riesgo Montero Espinosa (Q112959074): printer and owner of the Press of Riesgo y Montero located in Donostia-San Sebastián: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Duplicate, nothing links here, I generated it, my bad --Iñaki LLbot (talk) 10:23, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

I assume you're referring to Lorenzo Riesgo Montero Espinosa (Q112959149), correct?

Is Lorenzo Joseph Riesgo y Montero (Q112943309) a different person?

–JustAnotherArchivist (talk) 22:14, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

Q112943104

Q112943104: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Appears non-notable and possibly promotional; 2 Google results for English label Jamie7687 (talk) 22:01, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

Uncertain: could probably be deleted based on a strict application of WD:N, but I expect there may be non-English sources that would establish notability. There may also be a BLP angle to consider; will leave to another admin. -- Ajraddatz (talk) 00:23, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

Q112970794

Q112970794: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Self-promotion, not notable, deleted at least four times before (most recently Q112961446), always submitted by the same user... --JustAnotherArchivist (talk) 11:18, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

Q112970702

Q112970702: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Promotion, not notable, previous entry Q112958822 was deleted just a few hours ago --JustAnotherArchivist (talk) 11:20, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

Q112967261

Q112967261: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Self-promotion, not notable, immediate resubmission of deleted Q112962158 by the same user --JustAnotherArchivist (talk) 11:24, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

Bulk deletion request: Spam pages on fictional muscians from Greece

1. Q112962808 (delete | history | links | logs)
2. Q112962830 (delete | history | links | logs)
3. Q112962754 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

More spam items (cf. this deletion request) on fictional Greek (t)rappers by the same 2-3 cross-wiki spamer IPs. Chalk19 (talk) 11:39, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

Q112786354

Q112786354: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable --191.191.77.89 13:49, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

Q112972386

The Analects (Legge) (Q112972386): English translation of Confucius: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Page mistakenly created, entity already exists elsewhere --2601:143:8201:6CF0:C173:D704:FC50:AA76 14:31, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

Q112972386

The Analects (Legge) (Q112972386): English translation of Confucius: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Page mistakenly created, entity already exists elsewhere --2601:143:8201:6CF0:C173:D704:FC50:AA76 14:31, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

Q112972386

The Analects (Legge) (Q112972386): English translation of Confucius: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Page mistakenly created, entity already exists elsewhere --2601:143:8201:6CF0:C173:D704:FC50:AA76 14:31, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

Q112972386

The Analects (Legge) (Q112972386): English translation of Confucius: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Page mistakenly created, entity already exists elsewhere --2601:143:8201:6CF0:C173:D704:FC50:AA76 14:31, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

Bulk request

• Q112942710 (self promotional)
• Q112943894
• Q112971784
• Q112971011

Non notable

• Q112943002
• Q112943003
• Q112943285
• Q112943313
• Q112971599
• Q112971534
• Q112971470
• Q112971023
• Q112958285

--Trade (talk) 15:19, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

Edit group QSv2/91519

Bulk edition with more items than expected by mistake. Please revert, the aim was to only to create new items, without modifying other qs. The result was duplicated statements. Please delete the wjhole batch.Thanks  Delete

Q110994413

Q110994413: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ashkar_Techy --2409:4073:19B:B757:0:0:1C5D:B8B1 16:35, 8 July 2022 (UTC)