Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive/2017/11
- 2017
This page is an archive of past discussions from Wikipedia:Requests for page protection. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to request page protection, please do so at WP:RFPP.
01 November 2017
Temporary semi-protection: Ongoing pattern of vandalism, POV and promotional edits from various IPs and new accounts. RivertorchFIREWATER 17:47, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
- Pending-changes protected indefinitely. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 18:50, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – per Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dopenguins. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:35, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. RickinBaltimore (talk) 20:49, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – per Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dopenguins. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:36, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. RickinBaltimore (talk) 20:49, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing from multiple IPs. Adamgerber80 (talk) 03:17, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:25, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary full protection – Revertwarring against site-wide MoS rules (on the basis of a faulty interpretation of a topical rule), continuing after objection on the editor's talk page, and after the position of that editor (Codename Lisa) was proven factually incorrect at WT:MOSCOMP. There are now at least two three discussions open about this in which that editor can make their case, but they just keep reverting on the same faulty basis (against WP:CONLEVEL) and avoiding substantive discussion, instead dwelling on editor rather than edits, at both talk pages. This needs to stop now. 3RR warning has been given. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ >ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ< 14:49, 1 November 2017 (UTC); updated: 18:30, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- Wow. I thought RPP was for vandals and disruptors. Why is my established colleague treating me like one? As a matter of fact, my esteemed colleague SMcCandlish has been acting like an angry bull today, totally shattering the image of a respectful editor I had made of him. It is like seeing Mother Teresa using a nuclear bomb to kill people. I fear that any further attempt to communicate with him results is failure, heartbreak and God knows what else, but certainly not a collegial consensus.
- I give up. I won't revert him anymore. I believe any sane editor would disagree with him. —Codename Lisa (talk) 15:07, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- Just for the record: Actually, it was Codename Lisa who made a bogus vandalism accusation [2] (calling WP:BRD reversion of undiscussed addition of a new rule to a guideline "vandalism", even after already pointed to the talk page discussion opened for the "D" in BRD), and also Codename Lisa who has been generating the drama, including burying a BRD post in personalization about editors instead of discussion of content [3], followed by similar material in user talk [4], including psychological projection [5] and an attempt to evade mandatory notices [6]. No idea what the cause of this drama-mongering and melodrama is, but it's silly, passive-aggressive, and uncollaborative. To what end, I have no idea. Contrary to Codename Lisa's projection, I am "calm" and not at all in "one hell of a bad mood"; I've been citing sources and policy and making simple logical arguments, and am actually in a very good mood, though perplexed by CL's behavior; I don't recall having any issues with this editor before. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ >ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ< 18:30, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- Fully protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protection is for edit wars and content disputes. Blocking is for 3rr violations and disruption. WP:BRD- now time to discuss, please. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 17:42, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- Widely advertised discussion open at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style now. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ >ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ< 18:11, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Protection: After PC-protection expired in July, vandalism has still occurred for a few months, especially some IPs and newly registered users. --George Ho (talk) 17:26, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 17:33, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Electoral system articles subject to persistent disruption by indefd user Ontario Teacher BFA BEd
- Proportional representation (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Mixed-Member Systems (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Mixed electoral system (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Mixed-member proportional representation (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Semi-proportional representation (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Template:Electoral systems (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) – belongs to this group, too, but already has permanent semi-protection
- Ontario Teacher BFA BEd (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ontario Teacher BFA BEd/Archive (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ontario Teacher BFA BEd (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Permananent semi-protection: These articles have been subject to persistent political bias by User:Ontario Teacher BFA BEd since August 2015 and, despite an indefinite block ([7]), this shows no sign of abating. Now a patently good-faith and knowledgeable user, Rhys Goldstein (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), is trying to fix these articles, but is getting very little support. For example, Proportional representation has some 180 watchers but attracts next to no supportive edits from experienced users (User:Joel B. Lewis is the praiseworthy exception). The guy needs help, semi-protection is the minimum, though it's hardly sufficient – check out this sock [8], the twelfth edit is to the above semi-protected template. Pretty easy. --BalCoder (talk) 17:31, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:33, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.for each -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 17:56, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Automated comment: @Dlohcierekim: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:18, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Disruptive editing by similar IPs. My name isnotdave (talk/contribs) 11:01, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 11:44, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected. (One day.) AlexiusHoratius 17:09, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
pending changes: Multiple IP user is constantly adding the same unreferenced youth national teams caps and have no intention to stop:[9][10][11][12][13]. Probably this is blocked user HankMoodyTZ.--Oleola (talk) 13:20, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 16:35, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- International recognition of Kosovo (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Dear Admins of englisch Wikipedia: Please protect the article International recognition of Kosovo for a time. IPs vandal the page because serbian source write Suriname have recognition Kosovo. Kosovo write: We never have become a letter or verbal note of recognition from Suriname. Thats the last newest and actual source. --Elmedinfeta (talk) 13:37, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 17:07, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Some IPs are inserting hindi insults too. Was protected for a month and vandalism started again after unprotection. Galobtter (talk) 11:31, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- Actually, I'd like ammend that to Permanent pending changes protection. This page constantly gets vandalism edits, and had BLP violations sitting there for months before I removed it (the middle names of various people were replaced with hindi insults or were insulted in some other way; in fact someone noted there in the page with "galiyan baar baar kyu"-->"why constantly insults"). It rarely gets constructive edits. Seems to fit perfectly for pending changes protection. Galobtter (talk) 12:02, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 16:33, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Attacked once again by Japanese IP sock. Areaseven (talk) 12:19, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 15:02, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Due to the high popularity of this page following the success of the hit musical “Hamilton”, vandalism has resurfaced with a vengeance almost immediately after the previous protection period has expired. Please reinstate protection
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:24, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing from multiple IPs. Adamgerber80 (talk) 03:18, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined Such a minor thing. No need to revert and certainly no need for protection right now as it's only happened twice here. Anarchyte (work | talk) 09:43, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing from multiple IPs. Adamgerber80 (talk) 03:18, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last edited two days ago. Hopefully safe to assume the disruption has stopped. Anarchyte (work | talk) 09:43, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing from multiple IPs. Adamgerber80 (talk) 03:19, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined Last edited four days ago. Can assume the vandalism has ceased. Anarchyte (work | talk) 09:39, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing from multiple IPs. Adamgerber80 (talk) 03:20, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Anarchyte (work | talk) 09:37, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing from multiple IPs. Adamgerber80 (talk) 03:16, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined, seems to have stopped four days ago.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:34, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing from multiple IPs. Adamgerber80 (talk) 03:16, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- Is it really a worthy subject to edit-war about?--Ymblanter (talk) 07:41, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Probably one of the pettiest wars I've ever seen, but it's disruptive nonetheless. Anarchyte (work | talk) 09:40, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated Vandalism. Suparna narayanan (talk) 05:56, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined, your edits are indeed promotional and, not surprisingly, were reverted.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:35, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Lordtobi (✉) 00:29, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 02:30, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk • contribs) 02:22, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 03:05, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. FrB.TG (talk) 05:20, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:40, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – repeated sockpuppet vandalism. ‖ Ebyabe talk - Repel All Boarders ‖ 05:47, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:38, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IPs making hoax claims about supposed future move of studio to US. Meters (talk) 00:52, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 02:32, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: vandalism – An IP vandal is continually removing explanatory content. Paul Benjamin Austin (talk) 02:00, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. not so much vandalism as a content dispute/edit war. Now both sides can discuss the merits of one another's cases. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 02:36, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP hopper editwarring . Darkness Shines (talk) 02:22, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 03:07, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing from multiple IPs. Adamgerber80 (talk) 03:00, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 03:05, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing from multiple IPs. Adamgerber80 (talk) 03:01, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 03:03, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
The Disaster Artist Title
- The Disaster Artist (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- The Disaster Artist (film) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism - An IP user who has an ever-changing IP address continues to edit the full title of The Disaster Artist book on both pages and engages in no discussion at all. At the very least I think a temporary protection would be helpful to stop them and if they return I can re-apply for indefinite. Jeanjung212 (talk) 19:09, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
- Not done. Content dispute. Take it to the talk page. MelanieN (talk) 21:30, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Kosack (talk) 20:20, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 21:33, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
Can we finally unlock the name for this page? If you recall, I requested this previously but with so many bad faith editors trying to spam this, I was told to submit it to articles for creation. I did so and it was denied (by user Flow234 who is now blocked for using multiple accounts). I have done nothing but good edits on Wikipedia (please check my edit history) and feel like I am being treated like a second class editor because of other people trying to spam. I am not sure how any other user has any more rights to judge the notability of the topic than I do since we are all in the same boat. I think this is evidenced by the now banned user whose opinion was apparently valued more than my contribution history. I have since moved the page to the person’s real name of Gazzy Garcia and invite editors to recommend it for deletion if they feel it is not notable (there are also two other related pages created by another editor, Lil Pump (mixtape) and Gucci Gang). What I would request is that the name Lil Pump be unlocked so that we can move the page to the proper name. By the way, I made another request to the administrator about three weeks ago and they have not edited during that time so I have had no response.--DoubleuWW (talk) 03:59, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment) @Cryptic: Protecting admin. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk • contribs) 21:35, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
- @DoubleuWW:, let us be clear - you want the name unlocked so that you want to circumvent AfC, right? It might be ok, but let us have it clear first.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:07, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
- @Ymblanter: I understood it as him wanting to move Gazzy García to Lil Pump (presumably with a redirect?). Samsara 18:03, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks Samsara. I would then say open a move request, wait for two weeks, and any admin would move the article.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:05, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
- @Ymblanter: I understood it as him wanting to move Gazzy García to Lil Pump (presumably with a redirect?). Samsara 18:03, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
- Done This appears to be resolved, page has been moved, and the redirect is protected. kelapstick(bainuu) 23:57, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
02 November 2017
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. MYS77 ✉ 05:05, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. AlexiusHoratius 14:08, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
- German declaration of war against the United States (1941) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion by User:HarveyCarter. Binksternet (talk) 14:25, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked. IP blocked by Favonian, making protection superfluous. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:37, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Anonymouspoutateoh (talk) 16:24, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:24, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment) Already protected by administrator Widr. for 3 days. 159.89.10.214 (talk) 18:02, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. – Train2104 (t • c) 18:20, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected indefinitely. now it is like the target page -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 19:35, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – ip vandalizes my talk page. Digifan23 (talk) 04:36, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 13:37, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk • contribs) 16:07, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 16:21, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism returned after latest protection expired. Nihlus 16:17, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 16:20, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
Protection: Less frequently edited, but most of the edits are vandalism. George Ho (talk) 16:56, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 17:38, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The article is flooded by anon IP editors and newcomer users, who try to delete the earlier news and analyzes of the party (since Jobbik moved from far-right toward right-wing in the last years). The Wikipedia is not the place of censorship. . Norden1990 (talk) 09:41, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked. 84.206.42.2 (talk · contribs) blocked for 24 hours for going over 3RR. There haven't been any other IPs in the past week; for now I'd rather just block the offenders and only protect if there's a flood of them. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:22, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Addition of unsourced nonsense from some IP hopper based in the Philippines. Blake Gripling (talk) 15:05, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:37, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
Pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Anonymouspoutateoh (talk) 15:55, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 16:01, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: dynamic IP engaged in slow-motion edit-war over the past week. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 19:46, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 14:09, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous vandalism by Japanese IP sockpuppets. Areaseven (talk) 09:26, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 13:55, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous vandalism by Japanese IP sockpuppets. Areaseven (talk) 09:26, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 13:57, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
Pending changes protection: The article is a magnet for tendentious edits and warring due to its relation to the Arab–Israeli conflict: [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] [27] [28] [29] [30] [31] —swpbT go beyond 13:18, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 14:01, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. ChemNerd (talk) 13:28, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 14:05, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Many new accounts and IPs adding unnecessary "TBA" placeholders for a 2018 album without sources. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 05:28, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 13:40, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi protection Persistent vandalism and disruptive edits from IPs Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 08:54, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 13:43, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous vandalism by Japanese IP sockpuppets. Areaseven (talk) 09:25, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks , after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 13:45, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous vandalism by Japanese IP sockpuppets. Areaseven (talk) 09:26, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 13:47, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed: BLP policy violations. Binksternet (talk) 01:05, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
- @Binksternet: semi won;t suffice?
- Pending-changes protected indefinitely. If that does not work, we can upgrade -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 13:15, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
- CSA Steaua București (football) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Temporary extended confirmed: Since unprotected from admin access only. Edit war was back yet again (and fail to use talk page) and require increase the protection level back to extended confirmed or even admin. Matthew_hk tc 02:10, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
- FC Steaua București (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Temporary extended confirmed: add 08:54, 2 November 2017 (UTC) for vandalism Matthew_hk tc
- Fully protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 13:20, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent vandalism – Non-stop vandal magnet (PC would help). - FlightTime (open channel) 04:09, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @FlightTime: rearrange the words to make a well-known phrase: "not aww shit again this jeez" - indefinite ECP I think is overkill for the time being, so I'm taking the previous 1 week protection and escalating accordingly. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:45, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – 7 days. Current news, Vandalism seen. 1233Talk 10:48, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:41, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Bobherry Talk Edits 12:37, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- Whereas there is indeed some disruption, there are many useful IP edits, and there are currently a lot of eyes on the article, every disruption gets reverted within seconds, so that I would suggest to decline.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:39, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:50, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Bakilas (talk) 05:35, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:51, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism - rapid fire by multiple IPs Jim1138 (talk) 08:02, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
- The last 50 edits or so have been almost all vandalism (made in the last few minutes) and the IPs are even starting to edit conflict with each other. -Sonicwave (talk|c) 08:04, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 08:15, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. – Muboshgu (talk) 03:54, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 04:36, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected. Enigmamsg 04:45, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jay Coop · Talk · Contributions 04:06, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 04:36, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected. Enigmamsg 04:45, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – just won ws/marriage proposal on national tv drawing unconstructive edits. WNYY98 (talk) 04:34, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Enigmamsg 04:44, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent block evasion by User:Giubbotto non ortodosso. Binksternet (talk) 14:03, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- Extended confirmed protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 17:03, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from IP user. Medmig (talk) 16:30, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked. had moved on to next page -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 17:37, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – About half of the edits to this article are vandalism or focus on one location. Daylen (talk) 00:32, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. It looked like some constructive ip edits. maybe this will give them time to find something else to do. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 01:16, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
03 November 2017
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The article is a BLP on a Nepali politician. An IP editor (from pattern of edits, probably a single person, but with dynamic IP address) has been making numerous edits to the article, many of which are edit tests, for example adding non-existent templates, or experimenting with wiki markup. The page is on my watch list, so every few days I go in to clean it up. Unfortunately the IP editor is persisting in the edit tests, ignoring either messages that I've tried to leave on user talk page (ineffective because of dynamic IP) or in my edit summaries. The edits have also become bolder: silently removing citation needed tags, adding good-article template (it is not a GA), and reverting other maintenance that I've done. I'm requesting temporary semi-protection as other attempts to catch attention of this IP editor have failed. Thank you. Kbseah (talk) 13:53, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
- Support protection: Page history shows this is an IP hopper on one specific range. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk • contribs) 15:06, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 20:17, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Requesting temporary protection of reasonable length as I foresee this article to attract attention as long as the article subject remains viral. . Optakeover(U)(T)(C) 14:06, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 20:20, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection:Ever since a conspiracy theory video by the "Internet Historian" went viral, Truthers have been trying to add unsourced or poorly sourced information to change the tone of the article. (To exonerate the hoaxer.) [32][33][34][35], and a bunch more. ApLundell (talk) 15:05, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 20:25, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jc86035 (talk) 15:20, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 20:28, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jc86035 (talk) 15:27, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:29, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 20:31, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Article has needed 15 reverts in last 2 months due to disruptive edits / BLP inaccuracies, mainly by IP editors. Spike 'em (talk) 11:34, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 20:11, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 15:43, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:59, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Widr. 24 hours. Clerk tag. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk • contribs) 19:24, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Conspiracy theorist vandal who necessitated protection of this page in the past has returned. . Deli nk (talk) 17:04, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:30, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Prolog. 1 month. Clerk tag. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk • contribs) 19:29, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing. Bobherry Talk Edits 13:29, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:05, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: The internet learned a new word, comparable to cuck. I am seeing this new phrase thrown all over YouTube so I am not sure if we want to be proactive on this or not. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 13:19, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Optakeover(U)(T)(C) 14:08, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 14:09, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Excessive vandalism in the past two days. JAGUAR 14:45, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:16, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from multiple IPs. Adamgerber80 (talk) 06:07, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AustralianRupert (talk) 10:27, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Long-term target of persistent IP vandalism. Entranced98 (talk) 07:37, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Favonian (talk) 10:30, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Protection: Frequently vandalized, even when the page has been infrequently edited. --George Ho (talk) 08:44, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AustralianRupert (talk) 11:17, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent vandalism by IP-hopping vandal. Toddst1 (talk) 03:05, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:14, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent disruptive additions by new users or IP. Could use a brief semi here. -★- PlyrStar93. →Message me. ← 03:20, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:18, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism ever since unprotected. Wackyike (talk) 03:30, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:21, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This article is just a magnet for vandalism. . JDDJS (talk) 00:17, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 01:27, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced content and other disruptive edits by anons. McPhail (talk) 21:03, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:10, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism. This a redirect page where edits are generally not expected, so a more long-term or indefinite semi-protection may be worth considering. Kingofaces43 (talk) 02:44, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
- Was about to request this myself. Similar vandalism has been hapeening for a while (even before it was a redirect). [36] [37] AIRcorn (talk) 05:06, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:12, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by a range of IPs & new accounts. David Biddulph (talk) 13:24, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 01:29, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated edit warring. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 19:16, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 01:32, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. TM 20:40, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 01:35, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – And high level of activity for film being released in North America this weekend. Brojam (talk) 14:19, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 01:25, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
- Hiroko Kasahara (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Kousoku Sentai Turboranger (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Kousoku Sentai Turboranger (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Ultraman Gaia (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by multiple IPs and one account. Appears to be block evasion. Jim1138 (talk) 23:44, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:08, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 01:26, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Digifan23 (talk) 00:31, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
- Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 00:52, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – someone or some persons are constantly trying to remove the page because it contains information they would rather wasn't there. The information is well sourced to a BBC documentary and news article, and the subject confirms it in his published autobiography, so this is not an attack page. Dysklyver 20:13, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- Extended confirmed protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 14:11, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed Attempt to recruit redditors to push through their POV, see [38] leading to an edit war. Investanto (talk) 09:27, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
- +1, yes we very much need this. This is crowd-driven cryptocurrency with a reddit community behind it, which has been discussing the Wikipedia and folks keep coming from there to try to pump up the article. We have advocacy from a semi-organized online community here, as well as financial COI. This aggressive note was left on the talk page today, and there has been edit warring at the article by a named user and IP addresses to restore a bloated, unsourced or SPS-sourced version. Please semi-protect for a month. We may need to go to pending changes but let's start here. Jytdog (talk) 14:05, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
- Extended confirmed protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Don't like EC. amenable to discussion, but it seems to me we need to discourage this sort of invasion. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 14:14, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
@Jytdog: please check my work. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 14:16, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks very much!! Jytdog (talk) 14:28, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. TM 00:03, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 00:16, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Automated comment: @Dlohcierekim: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:26, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Marvellous Spider-Man 16:21, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 17:34, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by new users and IPs—for 30 days or more (the page was previously protected for 3 months). Accireioj (talk) 18:44, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
- Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. walked smack dab into an edit war -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 19:43, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. For some odd reason it really picked up in August and September and has continued throughout October of this year. What's worse is that editors are not faithfully watching this page and checking for vandalism, even for the lead section of the article, which I just recently had to restore. Pericles of AthensTalk 21:14, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 23:02, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Continued long-term vandalism, deliberately misleading edit summaries, insertion of jokes, deletion of legit material, insertion of libelous material, edit-warring, a lot of poor-quality IP material, etc, etc, etc. Cpaaoi (talk) 22:27, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 23:00, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. LG-Gunther : Talk 23:00, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 23:04, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
04 November 2017
Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing from IPs and new accounts. Possible socks, but assuming good faith. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 12:57, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. But come back if this is still going on after a week or so. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:41, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry. Binksternet (talk) 13:27, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Also the recent disruption is from a single IPv6 range; a rangeblock could be explored. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:40, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. —Bey WHEELZ Let It RIP!✉📝Sign 16:07, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked. by another admin. Come back if the disruption resumes. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:38, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Contant conversion of redirect to copy of target article by ip. PRehse (talk) 08:34, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Immediate resume of disruptive editing following removal of page protection; addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content to article. livelikemusic talk! 16:28, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined some level of disruption is acceptable, especially with an ephemeral subject like a forthcoming tour and we shouldn't rush to shut out new editors who want to add details as they become available. Do come back if the gatekeeping becomes a major burden though. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:36, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: User:Orchomen's socks are back. Thanks. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 16:45, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:33, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
Unprotection: Per Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Redirects#Category request: Category:Lorde Suggestion. No opposition after 2 months and I feel that this is a reasonable category. feminist 15:02, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
- Agreed. There's no reason to still have this sysop protected four years after the original CfD. Nihlus 18:31, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
- @JamesBWatson: Protecting admin. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk • contribs) 21:37, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
- The reason that the category doesn't exist is unanimous consensus at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2013 September 23#Category:Lorde. My protecting the title was merely a mechanism to enforce that consensus. This is therefore effectively a request to overturn a decision in a deletion discussion. Most of what was said in the discussion applies just as much now as it did sat the time of the discussion, notably the redundancy to Template:Lorde, so I don't see justification for one or two editors to overturn the decision without discussion. A comment at Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Redirects#Category request: Category:Lorde Suggestion says "additional articles have been created since this was deleted in CfD", and if it is felt that that changes the situation sufficiently to justify overturning the decision then it seems to me it would fall under the heading of "significant new information has come to light since a deletion that would justify recreating the deleted page", which is one of the criteria for listing a case at Wikipedia:Deletion review.
- (At Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Redirects#Category request: Category:Lorde Suggestion Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars said "admin who locked has not answered". I have now found an archived talk page message about this, which I somehow failed to address. Probably I was busy at the time and then forgot to come back to it, for which I apologise.
Feminist did not inform me of her request here for my protection to be overturned. Perhaps she failed to notice the fairly prominent box at the top of this page containing instructions, in which instruction number 1 says "If you are requesting unprotection, the correct protocol is to ask the protecting administrator first for unprotection".) The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 10:23, 30 October 2017 (UTC)- @JamesBWatson: I did not ask you on your talk page first because Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars said
admin who locked has not answered
, which means you have already been asked (i.e. protocol has been followed) but did not respond. Now, are you going to unprotect the category? feminist 13:15, 30 October 2017 (UTC)- I wrote the note about you not informing me before I discovered the archived message from Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars which I mentioned above, and perhaps I should have removed the note concerning you when I discovered it, as in view of that it was not unreasonable for you to to take the view that making an exception to the instructions on this page was justifiable. As for the unprotection, if you have any reason to disagree with what I said above then I will be willing to consider it. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 13:24, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
- @JamesBWatson: This seems to be a needlessly trivial line to draw in the sand. That discussion was four years ago and made sense then; however, I strongly disagree that much of what was discussed then applies now. Additionally, please see Category:Wikipedia categories named after musicians by nationality and it's subcategories. I'll also point out that one of the voters in that CfD was the editor requesting its creation. I see no reason to drag this on further. Nihlus 19:23, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
- I have absolutely no personal opinion one way or the other whether this category should exist. However, what I am being asked to do is to take action to enable editors to reverse a decision at a deletion discussion. I have already suggested deletion review as a possibility, and consulting the deleting administrator is another (though perhaps of limited relevance for a deletion so long ago). The deletion was not mine, and I am not going to take action to enable it to be reversed without at the least the deleting administrator being consulted. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 17:02, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
- @JamesBWatson: This seems to be a needlessly trivial line to draw in the sand. That discussion was four years ago and made sense then; however, I strongly disagree that much of what was discussed then applies now. Additionally, please see Category:Wikipedia categories named after musicians by nationality and it's subcategories. I'll also point out that one of the voters in that CfD was the editor requesting its creation. I see no reason to drag this on further. Nihlus 19:23, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
- I wrote the note about you not informing me before I discovered the archived message from Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars which I mentioned above, and perhaps I should have removed the note concerning you when I discovered it, as in view of that it was not unreasonable for you to to take the view that making an exception to the instructions on this page was justifiable. As for the unprotection, if you have any reason to disagree with what I said above then I will be willing to consider it. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 13:24, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
- @JamesBWatson: I did not ask you on your talk page first because Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars said
- I'm quite willing to unprotect right now; since the odds of a deletion review decision are about 95% "overturn" and 5% "keep deleted" - and since more people here and at the linked AFC want the redirect than even voted in the CFD 4 years ago - it's more efficient to undo protection without further discussion at DRV, and anyone who really thinks it still shouldn't exist can start a new deletion discussion. The deleting admin hasn't edited in 2 months. My only concern is I won't be around a lot this afternoon if someone objects and demands my head. @JamesBWatson:, are you just saying you won't do it personally, or are you saying you actually object if I choose to do it? --Floquenbeam (talk) 17:24, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
- @Floquenbeam: I was just saying that I wouldn't do it. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 08:52, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
- Unprotected I agree with Floq. The subject's career has developed since 2013 and a DRV would likely be a waste of everyone's time. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:13, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
Pending changes: Even when infrequently edited, vandalism has still occurred. --George Ho (talk) 09:09, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:02, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
Protection: After semi-protection ended in April, vandalism still has occurred. The first page of history log does not contain at least one good edit from newly registered or IP editors. --George Ho (talk) 09:09, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:00, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – unsourced additions and vandalism by a lot of new users or IP's recently. -★- PlyrStar93. →Message me. ← 17:28, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:32, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – New editor vandalism of article under WP:ARBPIA3. Huldra (talk) 21:01, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
- Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. TonyBallioni (talk) 22:48, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Harassing IP hopper . - FlightTime (open channel) 01:51, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
- See this threat - FlightTime (open channel) 02:33, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:46, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Content dispute. - FlightTime (open channel) 01:56, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: IP vandalism recently and as usual, this is a UFC PPV event (a major one actually) and they are always target for a lot of vandalism. It goes down this Saturday, so it would be better to have it protected before the event begins. Thanks. Gsfelipe94 (talk) 03:28, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. There doesn't appear to be a excess of vandalism which would warrant protection, especially given the quantity of IP edits. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:48, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent edits by IP socks of blocked user Nate Speed; resumed editing as soon as previous protection expired. Trivialist (talk) 23:19, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:54, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Multiple IP accounts adding unsourced information. HapHaxion (talk / contribs) 05:34, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:49, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 05:58, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:03, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
This may be out of order, but given the very public discussions going on, I'm going to request in a public forum that BrownHairedGirl consider reducing the protection to ECP. GMGtalk 00:37, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
- RFC is ongoing, I would be inclined to wait until protection expires on Friday.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:05, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
- Well, I wasn't particularly hopeful to get a response, and I figured a comment there to that effect would just have been drowned out. But it would certainly make be feel better about enacting a policy change if we first tried the tools that were already available to us. Apparently that's not happening though. GMGtalk 19:00, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
- For the policy change, I do not think this is a correct venue. Btw here topics never get arxived without a response (even if the response is sometimes template-like).--Ymblanter (talk) 07:37, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- The Protection expired a few hours ago. Gary "Roach" Sanderson (talk) 19:41, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
- For the policy change, I do not think this is a correct venue. Btw here topics never get arxived without a response (even if the response is sometimes template-like).--Ymblanter (talk) 07:37, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- Well, I wasn't particularly hopeful to get a response, and I figured a comment there to that effect would just have been drowned out. But it would certainly make be feel better about enacting a policy change if we first tried the tools that were already available to us. Apparently that's not happening though. GMGtalk 19:00, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
- Done Protection has expired, but I've re-added a semi to it. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:59, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Refuse Fascism is organising a high-profile protest to take place tomorrow that is also the subject of a right-wing conspiracy theory (documented in the article). As a result, several unregistered editors have in the last two days been adding unsourced contentious and/or derogatory claims to the article. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 18:39, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:41, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Disruptive edits from IPs restoring component charts; the IP address changes every time they edit. Was protected not too long ago for a similar reason; if it is protected this time, can the protection level please be increased? Ss112 19:50, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:42, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
Extended confirmed: BLP policy violations. Snuggums (talk / edits) 20:13, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined Given that there are only a few users involved I'd prefer to go down the warning and blocking path. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 01:44, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent removal of plot by various IP users. Ravensfire (talk) 02:38, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator The Bushranger. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:46, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA3#500/30. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk • contribs) 11:53, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined Not sufficiently related as to be encompassed in the sanctions Mifter (talk) 01:19, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – new editor vandalism of article under WP:ARBPIA3. Huldra (talk) 21:00, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I'm also not sure this is under ARBIA3. It seems to be about a historical village that has nothing to do with the Arab-Israeli conflict. TonyBallioni (talk) 23:06, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
- Talk:List of songs recorded by Miley Cyrus/Archive 1 (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page was blanked by suspected sockpuppet, see IP's edit history. Shearonink (talk) 22:08, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. TonyBallioni (talk) 22:22, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
- That's fine but please take a look at the recent gang of disruptive accounts that are vandalizing multiple articles connected with Miley Cyrus. Shearonink (talk) 22:25, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection for one month. Article has a long history of IP's and a few named accounts coming to promote the subject of the article who is from Singapore. The subject of the article has a company that has gone public in Australia and sure enough, an IP account is edit warring like crazy to pump up the bio. Jytdog (talk) 18:17, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 01:59, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edit warring over the potentially spoileriffic details in the intro continues. Crboyer (talk) 19:56, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 01:51, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – various IPs (that at this time geolocate to a specific area of Spain) over the past few days reverting and/or adding erroneous content. Shearonink (talk) 20:32, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:46, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 01:38, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite full protection: Repeatedly recreated
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Something needs to be done to drive the editors to the talk page. Nihlus 05:24, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
- Not done. The editors appear to have ceased their edit warring and moved to the talk page already. However, there is an IP adding unsourced material; if they do that one more time I will semi-protect. MelanieN (talk) 20:06, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk • contribs) 16:35, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 20:40, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Brojam (talk) 21:52, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. TonyBallioni (talk) 22:43, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent edits by IP socks of blocked user Nate Speed; resumed editing as soon as previous protection expired. Trivialist (talk) 23:19, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (work | talk) 00:42, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Request semi-protect. Persistent vandalism by IP editor. Yes, I know we normally don't protect the talk pages, but this is clearly disruptive. Niteshift36 (talk) 16:01, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 20:38, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed: BLP policy violations – Long-term abuse from multiple Maine IPs. Binksternet (talk) 17:38, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 20:42, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – User:CabbageSarah Sarahpresavagee. Operator873CONNECT 21:56, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. TonyBallioni (talk) 22:25, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
05 November 2017
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Jetstreamer Talk 20:37, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Samsara 15:36, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 89.42.193.86 (talk) 19:45, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 20:10, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Brojam (talk) 20:03, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 20:07, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Bit of an ongoing problem here with fans of some youtube "personality" editing in variations on the same joke repeatedly. Not a lot on any given day but it's been going on for months with no end in sight. Pinkbeast (talk) 16:34, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 15 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 17:08, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 17:08, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
Pending Changes: High level of IP vandalism on an article that is not actively edited by anyone else. Dondville (talk) 17:22, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 17:32, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 17:32, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This obviously needs more and supposedly longer protection. Once the last protection ended, IP and new users started to vandalize this page again. -★- PlyrStar93. →Message me. ← 17:57, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 18:48, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 18:48, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Dynamic IP changing birthdate against references - persistent long-term. Geraldo Perez (talk) 13:41, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 13:56, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Or pending changes protection: Long history of poor quality, unsourced edits and vandalism. Optakeover(U)(T)(C) 13:45, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected indefinitely. Samsara 14:03, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by a couple of IPs on this BLP. Thanks. Jack Frost (talk) 14:39, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 14:55, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 14:55, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
Automated comment: @Samsara: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:11, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 15:23, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 15:23, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism and addition of unsourced content by multiple IP's and accounts. Seems to be due to recent allegations of illegal voting. Jiten talk contribs 15:14, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Nick. Samsara 15:24, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent harassment of blocked editor. Page could probably use some REVDELs as well. Mojoworker (talk) 20:47, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
- Fully protected indefinitely. Samsara 13:21, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:Wiki Science Competition 2017 in the United States (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism/test edits. – Train2104 (t • c) 21:26, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 13:16, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Reports are that he has been arrested today. This is a pre emptive article protection request. Huldra (talk) 23:35, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term vandalism. Optakeover(U)(T)(C) 13:30, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 4 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 13:35, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of vandalism; I had to remove several layers of it. Many different usernames and IPs; over 100 edits made just today. 65HCA7 12:37, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
- There are a lot of edits being made there. There was some vandalism earlier but I can't tell whether the most recent edits are good or bad. Inclined to leave this for the time being and see what happens. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:53, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 13:02, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Repeated addition of original research and unsourced speculation to the article. — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 23:10, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 12:59, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Poorly sourced or not even sourced additions or edit to an exceptional claim. Some of edits are not even for gatherings but just events with a high number reported. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 13:02, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 13:07, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 13:07, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. AIRcorn (talk) 00:15, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 12:56, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopper targeting page. Marianna251TALK 01:11, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 12:51, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:20, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
- Creation protected indefinitely. Samsara 12:48, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptivr edits, unexplained removal of contents. RRD (talk) 18:22, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected indefinitely. Samsara 11:44, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Excessive amounts of vandalism from numerous ip's. Araratic (talk) 11:42, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 11:55, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 11:44, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 18 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 11:51, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Combination of vandalism and addition of unsourced content by non-autoconfirmed users. MPFitz1968 (talk) 22:14, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 11:31, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent sockpuppetry by a block evasion user using series of IPs, page need a protection. More information see Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Albert20009. Molecule Extraction (talk) 02:35, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
- There hasn't been a lot of disruptive editing yet - let's try PC1 first before reaching for bigger guns. Samsara 11:38, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 11:38, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Dr. K. 08:43, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected indefinitely. Samsara 09:57, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Kosack (talk) 08:44, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 09:45, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – The article has been a subject of sockpuppetry; lease see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/PerfectlyIrrational. There's now a new account operating there which may be the sock of the same editor. ECP protection would potentially resolve the issues. . K.e.coffman (talk) 17:41, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
- As per current custom, we'll semi it first and then elevate it if disruption continues. Samsara 09:27, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 09:27, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Either multiple people or IP hopper targeting page. Marianna251TALK 00:34, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:22, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Widr. Samsara 09:32, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Sock edits have returned. ‖ Ebyabe talk - State of the Union ‖ 04:55, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 06:09, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Zzuuzz. Samsara 09:32, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Repeated additions of text violating WP:SYN and WP:V and RS. No Swan So Fine (talk) 07:06, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 07:26, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: - repeated rapid reversions by IP with no discussion despite warnings JarrahTree 07:45, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 09:35, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Unsourced addition of "supersonic transport" on non-supersonic plane. --Jules (Mrjulesd) 17:47, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked. Re-report if it kicks back up. Anarchyte (work | talk) 01:03, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – 8 IPs/accounts in the last few days all spamming the same "my second choice" vandalism. –72 (talk) 01:06, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 07:18, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Told ya that the page would get vandalized... Anyway, back at it again. Please protect it. Gsfelipe94 (talk) 01:27, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:37, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
- Yes, somebody hurry up and protect the page. This is not the first time that vandalism likes this occurs during UFC events. Event pages should always be semi-protected during the actual events. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 01:52, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
- Should have been protected yesterday... Gsfelipe94 (talk) 01:58, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
- Direly needed. Fpwlada (talk) 01:58, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
- Second need for protection. Krazytea(talk) 02:00, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:08, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Block evasion. Star Trek: Canon vandal See William Riker page history @Ronhjones:. - FlightTime (open channel) 03:37, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected indefinitely. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 07:16, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Currently experiencing a coordinated attack by multiple IPs. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk • contribs) 05:37, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 07:20, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Binksternet (talk) 05:58, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
- Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 07:22, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article appears to have been under attack all day. KylieTastic (talk) 18:37, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AustralianRupert (talk) 22:59, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing –
Block evasion, sockpupperty. - FlightTime (open channel) 21:06, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:21, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Three users (two of them IPs) have vandalized the page multiple times. —Bey WHEELZ Let It RIP!✉📝Sign 00:10, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:22, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Most recent IP blocked for 31 hours, too. Anarchyte (work | talk) 01:03, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
30/500 protection Redirect is related to the Arab–Israeli Conflict. Gary "Roach" Sanderson (talk) 19:45, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined completely unnecessary; the redirect has existed since before 2002 and it hasn't been edited ten times in its entire history. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:04, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – persistent IP unconstructive edits. NPalgan2 (talk) 20:52, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined Content dispute; also only one editor so if the edits are truly disruptive blocking should be pursued. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:10, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. either please semi-protect it for some time or apply pending changes protection. Rajinimurugan1977 (talk) 06:56, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:07, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Despite being aware of an ongoing talk page discussion, multiple editors are modifying the content currently under discussion, approaching EW territory. GoneIn60 (talk) 10:16, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined Content dispute. It would have to be full protection or nothing. If discussion is ongoing, I suggest waiting until a consensus is clearly established. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:57, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
06 November 2017
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Nsmutte disruption. Home Lander (talk) 16:47, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 hrs, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Floquenbeam (talk) 16:51, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @Floquenbeam: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:02, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
- You aren't archiving this page fast enough, Cyberbot I. Protection expired as intended. --Floquenbeam (talk) 20:05, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
- Requesting immediate archiving... Samsara 22:03, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A wave of ip/spa vandals have hit the page today, apparently caused by a youtube video asking people to vandalise the article. bonadea contributions talk 19:30, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected indefinitely. Samsara 20:57, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
Extended semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Whenever this page isn't protected, there is vandalism on it. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 20:40, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 5 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 20:57, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism on today's Google Doodle. (rate of more than 5x vandalisms per 12hr). (2nd listing, we do have WP:SNOW).Widefox; talk 12:52, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 13:00, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 18:41, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Page was protected in page, but edit-warring/disputes continue with different editors. Obviously a very contentious issue, I think some sort of protection is needed (maybe not indefinite, but I don't think it's unreasonable). ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ᐐT₳LKᐬ 15:03, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 18:34, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Kosack (talk) 16:30, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 18:42, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:43, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 18:38, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
People's Action Party
- (Non-administrator comment) Not done: You have not specified what type of protection you want, for how long, and for what reason. ToThAc (talk) 18:11, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator AlexiusHoratius. Semi-protected for one week. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:41, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – High amounts of IP users adding either unsourced information, incorrectly worded information, or information that is just plain incorrect and goes against sources. There is a good chance that these edits will subside after Miss Universe on 26 November. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 11:08, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 18:20, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Not a newest problem, as socialist Wikipedians usually from South America have a tendency of vandalising this page as well as related Singapore articles as a consequence of evolving China and USA diplomatic ties. Happens once in a while e.g. when American Presidents visit parts of Asia or East Asian leaderships visit America. 138.75.189.204 (talk) 11:23, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 18:22, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Surge of IP editors adding in unsourced information, or removing text without any reason. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 13:30, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 18:28, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Dynamic IP repeatedly altering content without joining in discussion. Better the page be protected until a consensus is reached.. Let There Be Sunshine (talk) 14:32, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 18:29, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent changed in the number of episodes by random IPs despite the cited source in the article stating that 13 episodes are planned. —Farix (t | c) 14:45, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 18:32, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – The article is a subject of frequent pov editing, with some sockpuppetry in the mix, see for example: Special:Contributions/CornFlakes and Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/PerfectlyIrrational. . K.e.coffman (talk) 05:35, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
- Extended confirmed protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 05:52, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: same vandalism recommenced on expiry of last protection - Arjayay (talk) 16:08, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:46, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive968 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive editing from Nsmutte socks, and no reason for anyone else to be editing page. Home Lander (talk) 16:16, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. It's the current archive, so I don't want to indef it quite yet. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 16:18, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
- Oh jeez, SarekOfVulcan, I swore I clicked temporary and must have hit indefinite by mistake. Thanks. Home Lander (talk) 16:44, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Sources say the subject has apparently died, but IPs are removing the information. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 16:25, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Since the current problems are with IPs, not autoconfirmed users, not doing ECP yet. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 16:29, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent fancruft by IP users, and frequent adding of unsourced information. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 13:39, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:54, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Please can you protect this page to protect it from edits by ip users who are trying to limit the scope of this page and removing large chunks of data . Gbawden (talk) 06:33, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:21, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Frequent IP vandalism. Pahlevun (talk) 07:45, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: This page was protected two weeks ago when a number of IP numbers started whitewashing the page. Now the protection has expired, several IP numbers (which are obviously the same user or working together) have in the last 12 hrs started removing reliably sourced content. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 10:21, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 10:42, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: The ip's have returned to start their edit-warring once again, despite the multiple independent reviews, rewrites by independent editors, and stability of the article since. --Ronz (talk) 05:57, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:21, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent MMA championship fight win. TBMNY (talk) 06:53, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:23, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by IP users due to the involvement of political figures in the article. MT TrainDiscuss 09:21, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:26, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Let There Be Sunshine (talk) 10:16, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:27, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
Unprotection: User's request in his own user space. Optakeover(U)(T)(C) 09:27, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
- Done -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 09:37, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
Full-protection: Constant vandalism by sockpuppets. 222.167.166.187 (talk) 08:21, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
- Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 08:37, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent attack by sockmaster User:Random-5000, possibly including socks User:Cesarcelia et. al.. . Optakeover(U)(T)(C) 08:24, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 08:40, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by sockmaster . Optakeover(U)(T)(C) 09:17, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 09:22, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: IP vandalism of today's Google Doodle started 2mins after midnight. Last GD I requested took hours so may as well list now as I've not seen a GD not be vandalised (similar to the front page, we should just temp protect them). Widefox; talk 01:25, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. If you want to set up a policy of pre-emptively protecting such pages, that will need to be discussed elsewhere. MelanieN (talk) 01:58, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: IP vandalism on an almost constant basis, for a Featured List article no less. To be honest I'm wondering why I never reported this before, perhaps because in the past other editors were just quick to revert it. Things are not how they used to be here at Wikipedia. There seems to be no one running the insane asylum anymore and the loonies have been set loose, free to vandalize the place. It would be nice to have a momentary respite from the insanity, a couple months at least. Thanks in advance, Pericles of AthensTalk 01:43, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 02:01, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent attack by sockmaster User:Random-5000, possibly including socks User:Cesarcelia et. al.. . Optakeover(U)(T)(C) 08:11, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 08:15, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – One party has begun a discussion on the talk page, but the other is still reverting. EDIT: nope, they're both still editing. Marianna251TALK 23:59, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 01:32, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: On 5th November 2017, Daniel Poulter was in the news (national level) over allegations of 'inappropriate behaviour and misconduct' at Westminster and had been referred to the Conservative party disciplinary committee for further investigation. While he is under investigation, I recommend the page be protected against unregistered iP edits to ensure that the page is not vandalised and that information is more reliable given the potential backlash from the 2017 Westminster Sexual Scandal news. . Zweeb101 (talk) 15:25, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: As of the time of this writing, the last disruptive edit was over three days ago. Samsara 15:27, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 01:37, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Multiple IPs continuously refuse to read both the documentation and hidden notice and continue to update their favorite team without updating the other. This has been going on since the start of the season. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk • contribs) 22:07, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
- Withdrawn by requestor. Seems like the disruption has died for now. Will send again if it picks back up. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk • contribs) 01:39, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Favre1fan93 (talk) 04:58, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 05:02, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs are having an awful lot of fun screwing with the driver and race tables. Zappa⚡Mati 22:54, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. Samsara 17:36, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel articles 3 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 03:30, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 03:44, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Before the protection template was even removed, the page was vandalized again. JDDJS (talk) 03:44, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 04:53, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Favre1fan93 (talk) 04:24, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 04:54, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Favre1fan93 (talk) 04:24, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 04:57, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced material. REEEEEbbon Salminen(talk) 16:42, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:41, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection. This mixed martial artist just lost her first professional fight and there have been efforts all day to insert a claim that she lost via submission even though officially, she was knocked out. This should die out in two or three days. CityOfSilver 01:05, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:48, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection. - per edit dispute between two editors going on after an AfD.--BabbaQ (talk) 01:07, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
- Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:56, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement. Shrike (talk) 13:23, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
- Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Samsara 13:33, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Created twice recently, both times by Nsmutte socks. Home Lander (talk) 19:50, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
- We usually do it on the second recreation. Samsara 20:14, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
- Not done Samsara 20:14, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 23:03, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 23:11, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Vandalism as a result of recent mass shooting event. 52.144.39.47 (talk) 20:16, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:42, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment) Already protected by administrator Black Kite. for 1 week. 79.21.220.203 (talk) 20:52, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Black Kite. Samsara 22:01, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Lizard (talk) 21:22, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 22:04, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Lizard (talk) 22:41, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 22:49, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
07 November 2017
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. BangJan1999 21:05, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 21:37, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Disruptive editing by IPs Snowflake91 (talk) 21:29, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 21:33, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism due to Google Doodle. Tar-Elessar (talk) 21:47, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alexf(talk) 21:53, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Sources found suggest that there is "no official word" from Sony that this is in development, some confirm this and still have a "release date" supplied by third parties. No point in removing protection until official word from Sony is given, through official channels. Nightfury 15:13, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- Creation protected indefinitely. Samsara 19:54, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated IP vandalism today. Short day or two semi-protection should be fine. Kingofaces43 (talk) 20:17, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected indefinitely. Samsara 20:26, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Rumours about his possible death, relating to a plane crash in the Gulf of Mexico. Trut-h-urts man (T • C) 20:33, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- Name of the deceased in the crash reportedly won't be released until 4:30pm eastern. Could really use someone to protect the page asap - experiencing a high volume of unsourced additions. Trut-h-urts man (T • C) 20:53, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 21:01, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. -- The Voidwalker Whispers 20:34, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 21:03, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruptive edits made by unregistered users. B.Lameira (talk) 16:18, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
- Doesn't look like enough disruptive activity to me yet. Samsara 22:22, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. RickinBaltimore (talk) 15:20, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Talk:June 2017 Brussels attack
Temporary Semi-protection: - article talk page is a battleground. TheGracefulSlick is battling.--BabbaQ (talk) 19:07, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined Talk pages are not protected for heated discussions. If there is concerns of a user's editing, take it to AN/I. RickinBaltimore (talk) 15:21, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent unsourced genre including IP Special:Contributions/69.74.46.146. -- 115.164.215.121 (talk) 12:12, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Alexf(talk) 15:34, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Different IPs keep removing Pokémon (anime) from the list of animated programs, dispute a reference verifying said fact. IPs makes repeated false claims in edit summaries and even engaged in personal attacks against those reverting the vandalism. —Farix (t | c) 18:59, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 19:25, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Long time Semi-protection: Again, once more, after protection expiration, standard vandalism by restoration of talk page comments by socks of indef blocked Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Azul411/Archive. - DVdm (talk) 12:35, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 17:24, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Socks persistently adding copyvio and promo links. Laszlo Panaflex (talk) 15:52, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 16:04, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Same IP-hopping vandal that removes sourced content and is actually the 2 users Respawner267 and MalakoiExpert. Neverrainy (talk) 17:19, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 18:03, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 03:05, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. RickinBaltimore (talk) 15:30, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent MMA loss. TBMNY (talk) 03:23, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. RickinBaltimore (talk) 15:39, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Flickerd (talk) 03:25, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked: 2601:643:8680:520:94C6:6063:DC25:CBFC (talk · contribs) blocked by Widr. Samsara 08:15, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- @Samsara: This user has a dynamic IP and has been vandalising the page all week with the same edit, note they are back again with a different IP address [39]. Flickerd (talk) 13:22, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- Yes, that article needs protection. Long term vandalism by block evading user. 2601:188:180:11F0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 13:27, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. RickinBaltimore (talk) 15:38, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- Yes, that article needs protection. Long term vandalism by block evading user. 2601:188:180:11F0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 13:27, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- @Samsara: This user has a dynamic IP and has been vandalising the page all week with the same edit, note they are back again with a different IP address [39]. Flickerd (talk) 13:22, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Short-term and long-term history of vandals and POV-pushers targeting this article. — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 06:23, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alexf(talk) 15:46, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism following unexpected death of politician. Ghmyrtle (talk) 14:01, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alexf(talk) 15:36, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary full-protection: slow edit war over the inclusion of a link to season 4. Frietjes (talk) 14:09, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- what ever is done, the same should be done for The Face (TV series), The Face Men Thailand (season 1), and The Face Thailand (season 3). Frietjes (talk) 14:11, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alexf(talk) 15:38, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive edits. 2601:188:180:11F0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 14:24, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alexf(talk) 15:40, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Block evasion vandalism. 2601:188:180:11F0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 14:26, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alexf(talk) 15:40, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Recent spat of multi vector IP and new account vandalism, such as this, this, and this. --Hammersoft (talk) 14:31, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alexf(talk) 15:43, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism by many ip's due to rape allegation. Supercell121 (talk) 14:52, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Zzuuzz. Alexf(talk) 15:47, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:188:180:11F0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 15:10, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alexf(talk) 15:44, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Anon IP edit warring. Ifnord (talk) 15:29, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alexf(talk) 15:42, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced content from various IPs. Ss112 20:42, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. RickinBaltimore (talk) 15:22, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Resumption of massive, unsourced, personal attacks as soon as last protection expired "the founder was primarily motivated by the desire to steal from the Nigerian government and since his ability to steal is unbelievable, he stole $2 billion" etc. - Arjayay (talk) 10:22, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 11:06, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator HJ Mitchell. Anarchyte (work | talk) 11:15, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Repeated additions of negative, unsourced content to a biographical article by multiple IPs and new accounts. theinstantmatrix (talk) 11:25, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- If someone would pull the trigger on this one and allow me to close that tab it would be much appreciated. GMGtalk 14:13, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- This could use something more than temporary semi. It's been deluged by angry fans for days. 2601:188:180:11F0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 14:20, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Typically we don't go right to a stricter amount of protection immediately. I've given this a week, hopefully this quiets things down enough that people get outraged somewhere else. RickinBaltimore (talk) 14:35, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- This could use something more than temporary semi. It's been deluged by angry fans for days. 2601:188:180:11F0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 14:20, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Multiple IPs wanting to insert a movie theory proposed by article subject in his YouTube blog. Only source appears to be primary source of the subject himself. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 22:58, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
- Self-withdrawn ... IPs appear to have stopped for now. Will re-submit if the disruption resumes. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 23:35, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 09:42, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism. I.am.a.qwerty (talk) 09:04, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 09:31, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 09:31, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Unprotection: I would like to fix the double redirect to Menin' Qazaqstanym and I can't edit this page because it is fully protected. Secondly, I don't see any reason to keep a 10-year old protection as there hasn't been many edits to this page since protection was enabled. Pkbwcgs (talk) 13:21, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
- @Pkbwcgs: I've fixed the double redirect, but would encourage you to consider the causal relationship between full protection and the number of edits made to a page. Samsara 13:41, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pinging protecting admin Fish and karate per convention. Samsara 14:05, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
- No objection to the protection being removed. I think people are probably tired of Borat jokes by now. Also: Lol, Samsara. Lol. fish&karate 15:35, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
- @Pkbwcgs and Fish and karate: I've lowered the protection level to pending changes (WP:PC1). Samsara 09:36, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- No objection to the protection being removed. I think people are probably tired of Borat jokes by now. Also: Lol, Samsara. Lol. fish&karate 15:35, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
- For the bot:
- Done Samsara 09:36, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry by long-term vandal My Royal Young. 99.109.85.105 (talk) 04:09, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 08:49, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 08:49, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by IPs and new users. Accireioj (talk) 8:35, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 08:47, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Protection: Hi. I've been watching the Jackson J. Spielvogel page, and noticed a lot of vandalism. I reverted the vandal edits, but they just kept on coming. I reverted links to porn websites, a ROBLOX livestream, and a reference to a Los Angeles river death incident (the person who put that in the article did it in such a way that the average person would see it as fact, and they added a reference to assure that as well, but it was fake). People have been editing the nicknames of him, for example 'Jackson J. 'Josef Stalin' Spielvogel' and 'Jackson J. 'Git' Spielvogel'. The vandalism is getting out of hand, and I am applying for a semi-protection of the page, to review all edits before going ahead. I don't know if I should do it indefinitely, but the high level of vandalism is a big issue. AllyGebies (talk) 02:57, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 08:39, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Kosack (talk) 17:32, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. Samsara 22:20, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Vandalism edits by User:Brianmagallano IP sock. LG-Gunther : Talk 23:18, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 08:20, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Pending changes: Persistent vandalism – has had protections in past, almost all ip edits are not constructive. WNYY98 (talk) 02:39, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected indefinitely. Samsara 08:34, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – COI editors violating MOS:TM. . ViperSnake151 Talk 22:53, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. AlexiusHoratius 03:51, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. LG-Gunther : Talk 23:20, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. AlexiusHoratius 03:48, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Pure Vandal of the page, not on the external use. cyɾʋs ɴɵtɵɜat bʉɭagɑ!!! (Talk | Contributions) 00:59, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. AlexiusHoratius 03:48, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This needs to be changed to semi-protection. Nearly every unconfirmed edit is vandalism or original research targeting specific companies. Nihlus 03:31, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- Yes, the frequency has been too high for PC lately. Samsara 08:05, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 08:05, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement. Shrike (talk) 09:02, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: This page had been protected for good reason (pages about feces, toilets, etc. are prone to vandalism), but it seems that the protection has recently lapsed. Please protect it again before we see more vandalism and waste more of our time undoing the vandalism. Thanks a lot. EMsmile (talk) 12:40, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. Malinaccier (talk) 18:24, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
- this is disappointing. It is not "preemptively" - there was plenty of vandalism before we got the protection. So now we have to again allow vandals to come along and waste our time before we get it protected again? There is unfortunately no trend for less vandalism on Wikipedia. Particularly all the pages that deal with bodily functions, e.g. feces, defecation, urination - they all get a lot of vandalism. You'll see. Just look at the page history before we got it protected. :-( EMsmile (talk) 23:17, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
- I did look at it. That's why it was protected for an entire year. Samsara 23:55, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
- Is one year regarded as long? Is there any evidence to suggest that a page with this kind of topic would attract less vandalism in 2018 than it did in 2016? Just wondering if there is a hypothesis for this. (I can understand it with other kinds of topics that go in and out of favor, e.g. names of politicians) EMsmile (talk) 00:02, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- You are right that this is likely to attract further attention from vandals. My interpretation of the policy on preemptive protection is that we wish to maintain Wikipedia's status as "the free encyclopedia that anyone can edit" when at all possible. One year is regarded as long. My guess is that if the article is continuously disrupted that the next administrator will protect the page indefinitely. Malinaccier (talk) 00:30, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- OK, thanks for taking the time to explain this to me, much appreciated. Let's wait and see then. As soon as it gets vandalised more than 3 times, I will be back here and ask for page protection. :-) Thanks. EMsmile (talk) 01:13, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- You are right that this is likely to attract further attention from vandals. My interpretation of the policy on preemptive protection is that we wish to maintain Wikipedia's status as "the free encyclopedia that anyone can edit" when at all possible. One year is regarded as long. My guess is that if the article is continuously disrupted that the next administrator will protect the page indefinitely. Malinaccier (talk) 00:30, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- Is one year regarded as long? Is there any evidence to suggest that a page with this kind of topic would attract less vandalism in 2018 than it did in 2016? Just wondering if there is a hypothesis for this. (I can understand it with other kinds of topics that go in and out of favor, e.g. names of politicians) EMsmile (talk) 00:02, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- I did look at it. That's why it was protected for an entire year. Samsara 23:55, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
- this is disappointing. It is not "preemptively" - there was plenty of vandalism before we got the protection. So now we have to again allow vandals to come along and waste our time before we get it protected again? There is unfortunately no trend for less vandalism on Wikipedia. Particularly all the pages that deal with bodily functions, e.g. feces, defecation, urination - they all get a lot of vandalism. You'll see. Just look at the page history before we got it protected. :-( EMsmile (talk) 23:17, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism – 90% of pending edits are vandalism and require immediate unacceptance. See here. Pending Pages review is not strong enough for this article. {{u|Checkingfax}} {Talk}
13:12, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined (Already has pending changes protection, which looks like it is enough.) AlexiusHoratius 18:27, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
- Hi, AlexiusHoratius. By that logic, full protection would never be used. Over 90% of the edits on this page are vandalism. Pending Changes review will still let some slip through. The barrier to editing needs to be raised to full protection, so that changes will be discussed on the talk page. Vandal editors are doing constant hit and runs to try to get through the pending changes gauntlet.
- By what logic would full protection ever be warranted, if 90 percent plus is not enough? Cheers!
{{u|Checkingfax}} {Talk}
00:51, 7 November 2017 (UTC)- One of the only times full protection is used is when a bunch of autoconfirmed, established users are edit warring. Even then, the protection is only used for a few days - maybe a week. (Remember that only admins can edit a fully protection page - and even those aren't supposed to be substantial edits.) Full protection is never used on an article that is only being vandalized a few times a week by IPs. AlexiusHoratius 01:13, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Dondville (talk) 23:13, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 03:50, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: The article has been vandalized by 4 separate IPs over the past day. 十八 02:08, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 03:53, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Spike in vandalism in the last day. Nihlus 02:17, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 03:55, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed: BLP policy violations – Unsourced BLP/adverts by edit-warring dynamic IPs . Dr. K. 16:59, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 02:57, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – As usual, the IPs are not making a net positive. See other monthly pages like this (they've been protected in the past as well). EvergreenFir (talk) 19:51, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 03:02, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Lizard (talk) 23:47, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
- Also persistent addition of unsourced content. Given the level of IP vandalism it's hard to tell whether the unsourced content is genuine or a hoax. Marianna251TALK 00:31, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 03:44, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism since July by an IP-hopper and possibly sockpuppet. Timmyshin (talk) 00:23, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 03:46, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: This man is a candidate in a race that will be held on 7 November. There's already been vandalism by IP accounts in the last few hours and there will be more tomorrow. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 00:31, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 03:47, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated adding of unsourced claim. Gothicfilm (talk) 09:47, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 02:48, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP insertion of hoaxes. Snuggums (talk / edits) 19:30, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 22:25, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
vandalism. 70.21.192.95 (talk) 23:37, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GABgab 23:48, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
08 November 2017
Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Edit warring by new and IP accounts. Requesting indefinite protection because the article should not be edited by these accounts at all per the restrictions of WP:ARBPIAINTRO and [40]. VQuakr (talk) 06:58, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
- ARBPIA does not cover the Holocaust. Samsara 08:42, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Not doneSamsara 08:42, 8 November 2017 (UTC)- I looked at this in some more detail, and I now think this edit may qualify the article for coverage under ARBPIA3. Samsara 09:29, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
- Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Samsara 09:29, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection. ReeceTheHawk (talk) 15:31, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined No reason provided: no reason for protection evident from page history Vanamonde (talk) 15:49, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Too many disruptive edits by multiple IPs. Especially troublesome as it's currently at FAC. . Krimuk2.0 (talk) 19:23, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 20:22, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Protection: Frequently vandalized, even when infrequently edited. The first page of the history logs does not contain one good edit by either an IP user or a newly registered editor. --George Ho (talk) 19:58, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 20:20, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by IP changers. ReeceTheHawk (talk) 20:03, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 20:20, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Constant need to undo and revert unnaccurate or spam edits. The page had a temporary block on it in past week, but has since ended and the vandalism has started back up (by same IP user). TropicAces (talk) 00:48, 8 November 2017 (UTC)tropicAces
- User(s) blocked., we do not protect pages against one user.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:18, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit warring from User:WikipediaIRAN. Benyamin-ln (talk) 10:38, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined, the user has been warned, the next revert must get them blocker per WP:3RR which they have already overstepped.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:20, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ReeceTheHawk (talk) 13:52, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Alexf(talk) 13:56, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ReeceTheHawk (talk) 13:53, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Alexf(talk) 13:57, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – blocked user removing block notice and shared ip template . ‖ Ebyabe talk - State of the Union ‖ 18:44, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- User(s) re-blocked with talk page editing disallowed. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 18:48, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: Actually, I don't have a problem with them removing notices-- at least we know they read them. However, thier edit summaries were disruptive. They ned to find a new hobby, really. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 18:50, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Request for semi-protection from persistent sockpuppetry by Indonesian based user Albert20009 who using various IPs to make disruptive editing on the article. More information see Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Albert20009. Molecule Extraction (talk) 05:40, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated and persistent vandalism by multiple persons, protected before, vandalism has carried on after protection expired. The article is now GA, and has been through a peer review, so there shouldn't be any obvious issues for passerby’s to correct. I am requesting indefinite protection, but note the article is nominated for and may soon be on DYK, any temporary protection should probably cover that period if indefinite protection is not an option. Dysklyver 15:44, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Okay, so there's a bit of a protection log here; but the log also shows that after previous protections expired, the article remained okay for quite a while before vandalism began again. I see no reason not to keep using brief periods of protection when this occurs. Vanamonde (talk) 15:53, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Violation against Talk:Red_(Taylor_Swift_album)#Genre_in_alphabetical_order_or_not. 115.164.58.52 (talk) 08:11, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
- You're referencing a discussion that hasn't concluded, and the form of protection you've requested will primarily serve to lock you out of editing the article, of anyone that's edited it in the last three days. I'm not sure I understand what the intended purpose is. Samsara 08:58, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined as Samsara says Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:27, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – One user vows to restore content after afd consensus to redirect. Nightfury 09:14, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:31, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content; immediately resumed following previous protection. livelikemusic talk! 13:49, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 13:57, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 15:23, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Flickerd (talk) 12:24, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alexf(talk) 12:42, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: General reasons. ReeceTheHawk (talk) 13:48, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alexf(talk) 13:54, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-hopping vandalism. Mélencron (talk) 13:51, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alexf(talk) 13:55, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Slow vandalism by one editor with IPs starting with 193.61.240.*, all appear to belong to an UK university. theinstantmatrix (talk) 11:23, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 12:14, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 12:14, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: .... and no sooner has the previous protection expired that the IP vandalism starts up again. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:25, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 12:09, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – All sorts of BLP violations from anons. Article subject is currently headline news in the UK. Sitush (talk) 11:50, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I've got friends in Witham who can't stand the woman and actively campaigned against her at the 2017 election, but I don't believe that makes me WP:INVOLVED to do this. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:54, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Dynamic IP has been inserted the same rant for weeks. McSly (talk) 03:22, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 04:55, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Acroterion. Samsara 09:02, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Non-stop mass blanking by disruptive IP-hopper after the end of previous protection. IP-hopper targeted this article since 7 Nov again when the protection ended. Blocking the IP is not enough because he uses a dynamic IP-range. Wario-Man (talk) 06:10, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 5 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 10:10, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Excessive vandalism from non-autoconfirmed users. Minima© (talk) 08:51, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 09:02, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Sockpuppet accounts are being used to repeatedly delete information from this article, particularly under the "allegations of sexual assault and harassment" subcategory. CreationFox (talk) 22:43, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Ronhjones. Samsara 08:35, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk • contribs) 01:59, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 4 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 08:38, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Bouncing vandal adding personal attacks and unsourced information about an advertisement on the network involving dabbing that 'network fan' people on the Internet are bothered by, but no one else. Nate • (chatter) 04:07, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Automated comment: Error in Template:Reply to: Username not given. This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 04:10, 8 November 2017 (UTC)- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 04:55, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
- It was for 48h by The Bushranger (talk · contribs). Nate • (chatter) 06:09, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator The Bushranger. Samsara 08:12, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
- User:Prisonermonkeys (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- User talk:Prisonermonkeys (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
Full protection: a few weeks ago, I requested semi-protection after an IP editor kept disrupting the page. That editor has since registered an account and has continued his harrassing behaviour. This has since been referred to WP:ANI. Prisonermonkeys (talk) 07:04, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Mifter (talk) 03:00, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – User talk pages are not protected except in response to severe or continued vandalism. Mifter (talk) 03:00, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Extended-confirmed protection: High level of IP vandalism and unwarranted, irrelevant edits despite current semi-protection. Frequent vandalism by users, and violation of biographies of living people. Semi-protection seems unsatisfactory, please apply extended-confirmed protection. Rajinimurugan1977 (talk) 12:03, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Mifter (talk) 03:03, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. - FlightTime (open channel) 01:21, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
- Not done It was the work of one confused user who should be straight now. Ping me if this recurs and I will engage in further discussion with user. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 01:38, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. In particular, transphobic vandalism (which is subject to discretionary sanctions). ChiveFungi (talk) 02:56, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:10, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
- That "already protected" was me: Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --joe deckertalk 06:30, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced content from various IPs. Ss112 21:01, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. Level of editing by IPs is easy to manage with reverts, and good faith edits by new users and IPs are well mixed in over the last week or so. --Jayron32 15:43, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent restoration of excessive, likely copyrighted lyrics by various IP accounts. Please also see a related discussion at NPOVN: Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view/Noticeboard#Devil.27s_song. . K.e.coffman (talk) 01:15, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. It amounts to 2-3 edits in the entire month of October, and one in the month of November. Reverting seems to not be having trouble keeping up with this, and this would stop good-faith additions, which are happening over same time period.Jayron32 15:46, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: An article on a neo-Nazi group that attracts POV-challenged edits by IPs and socks; see for example: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/PerfectlyIrrational. Semi-protection would reduce the amount of disruptive edits. Alternatively, pending changes protection might also work. . K.e.coffman (talk) 02:21, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I've protected the page for two weeks but my gut says this is going to be an ongoing problem. Ping me if we need to extend the protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:55, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: This Wikipedia page was semi-protected one day ago due to persistent vandalism from IP numbers. As soon as the page was semi-protected, a confirmed single-purpose account began to vandalize the page. The single-purpose account has only edited two Wikipedia pages and they're both the pages for TV networks owned by Herring Inc. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 20:00, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Samsara 20:28, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Protected a week ago for three days, but now the enigmatic John Maloof has returned, as he has for almost a decade. InedibleHulk (talk) 23:39, November 7, 2017 (UTC) 23:39, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 23:55, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – The track list leaked but it has no official source [only the back of the album]. A certain user keeps trying to add it back in despite being told not to. . Jennica✿ / talk 00:34, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 01:12, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive edits by multiple accounts. Unsourced nonsense. 2601:188:180:11F0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 23:06, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 23:48, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 73.244.155.254 (talk) 23:30, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 23:50, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. LG-Gunther : Talk 23:36, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 23:54, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
09 November 2017
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Excessive vandalism from multiple IPs. Minima© (talk) 18:11, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alexf(talk) 21:40, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
Extended confirmed: BLP policy violations – Recent news story. This article has had persistent arguments, edit wars, etc. and will continue to be extremely high-profile through the December election. power~enwiki (π, ν) 18:44, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator User:KrakatoaKatie. Alexf(talk) 21:39, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
Request protection from recreation (salting). Multiple re-creations and socking hijinks involving this; see Richardaldinho at WP:COIN#Accusations of UPE from Investigator87. ☆ Bri (talk) 19:57, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
Create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Page has been repeatedly recreated, usually by COI editors. –Miles Edgeworth Talk 20:34, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary Semi-protection: High level of vanity vandalism, first as an IP, now as a new, vandalism only account. oknazevad (talk) 21:07, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alexf(talk) 21:42, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 21:23, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alexf(talk) 21:44, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. AIRcorn (talk) 21:42, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alexf(talk) 21:44, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Please refer to recent page history. - FlightTime (open channel) 15:12, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 15:18, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
- Issue resolved. Thank you, - FlightTime (open channel) 15:50, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Relatively high visibility page, long protection log and history of anon vandalism, short term semis over a span of 10 years have proved ineffective. –72 (talk) 16:18, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
RFPP|pd|2 months-- Dlohcierekim (talk) 17:46, 9 November 2017 (UTC)- @Dlohcierekim: Thanks, but another short term protection will be ineffective as proved by the long protection that goes back a decade. Naturally, vandalism usually comes from those who would otherwise be editing articles on presidents already protected. Many high visibility articles such as this are protected indefinitely after this much childish vandalism. Would you reconsider, perhaps indef Pending Changes if semi is too drastic? –72 (talk) 18:12, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected indefinitely.
Done -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 18:42, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
- Actually, this is 1 year, not indefinite. –72 (talk) 19:05, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Excessive vandalism from multiple IPs. Minima© (talk) 18:13, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
- And throwaway sock accounts now. - Julietdeltalima (talk) 18:59, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malinaccier (talk) 19:01, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection : Continued vandalism from new users and IPs--VVikingTalkEdits 14:50, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:32, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator SarekOfVulcan. Samsara 18:14, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – repetitive vandalism. ReeceTheHawk (talk) 16:45, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected indefinitely. Samsara 18:08, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: General. ReeceTheHawk (talk) 16:52, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 18:10, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: BLP vios. Neil S. Walker (talk) 14:38, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
- Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. needs more eyes. content needs review by uninvolved admin. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 17:38, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Ongoing hoax additions from multiple IPs. Snuggums (talk / edits) 15:45, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 17:43, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Immediate resume of previous editing behavior from last protection. livelikemusic talk! 15:57, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 17:48, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism on a near-daily basis. Lordtobi (✉) 17:18, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 6 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 17:51, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Constant edit-warring over alleged "furry" alliance to SS13. Boomer VialHolla! We gonna ball! 12:10, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 17:24, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Similar IP-hopping vandalism to that which caused recent protection of Bohemia (rapper). David Biddulph (talk) 12:44, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 14:03, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism and test edits by non-autoconfirmed user accounts. Jc86035 (talk) 14:02, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 17:30, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion by User:Daniel C. Boyer. Binksternet (talk) 03:33, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Anarchyte (work | talk) 07:18, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Seems to be a target of IP users posting nonsense on the page. 331dot (talk) 11:18, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 11:32, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: On 30 October 188.158.123.204 came up with the perfect solution to kill the article, and them reverted not just my specific edits, but reverted the whole article back to an approximately four years earlier state, destroying the results of years of collective efforts by dozens of editors. Since then this tactic became mainstay, and one time, IP only editors reverted the article back to this crap state half a dozen times, without ever using the talk page to give voice to their concerns. Maghasito (talk) 13:07, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
- Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Yes, I know the "wrong version" was protected. Please use the talk page, and if you are unable to reach consensus, invite outside scrutiny via WP:DRN or WP:3O. Vanamonde (talk) 14:01, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion by User:Daniel C. Boyer. Binksternet (talk) 03:33, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 07:18, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 07:18, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. -- (Radiphus) 07:34, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 07:45, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 10:29, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 10:43, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Ongoing wp:CRYSTAL predictions about outcome of election not certified until November 28. Stating opinions as facts in wp:WikiVoice. Dennis Bratland (talk) 17:17, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 01:55, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Block evasion by User:Daniel C. Boyer, multiple IPs. Binksternet (talk) 03:32, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 07:12, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 07:12, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection for three weeks: Remember last year? Same deal. Several instances of racist trolling by IPs,[41][42] and even the possibly good-faith ones are at least off-topic;[43] non-autoconfirmed editors can't participate in the editathon anyway. Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 06:53, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (work | talk) 07:14, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Ongoing vandalism after Michael Felger’s comments on 8th November show that has gotten some media attention.
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 07:07, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Ongoing wp:CRYSTAL predictions about outcome of election not certified until November 28. Stating opinions as facts in wp:WikiVoice. Dennis Bratland (talk) 17:15, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
- Not done. You and another editor have a disagreement, but it has not progressed to edit warring. You have opened discussion on the talk page, which is good. Work it out there. MelanieN (talk) 01:45, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Ongoing wp:CRYSTAL predictions about outcome of election not certified until November 28. Stating opinions as facts in wp:WikiVoice. Dennis Bratland (talk) 17:15, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
- Not done. I do see some disagreement, but it has not progressed to edit warring. I don't see any discussion on the talk page. I think you all will be able to work out a fair and accurate way to describe the situation. MelanieN (talk) 01:45, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Ongoing wp:CRYSTAL predictions about outcome of election not certified until November 28. Stating opinions as facts in wp:WikiVoice. Dennis Bratland (talk) 17:16, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
- Not done. I do see some disagreement, but it has not progressed to edit warring. I don't see any discussion on the talk page. I think you all will be able to work out a fair and accurate way to describe the situation. MelanieN (talk) 01:45, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Ongoing wp:CRYSTAL predictions about outcome of election not certified until November 28. Stating opinions as facts in wp:WikiVoice. Dennis Bratland (talk) 17:18, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
- Not done. I do see some disagreement. You yourself have reverted three times; beware of edit warring. I don't see any discussion on the talk page. MelanieN (talk) 01:45, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Vandalism by a number of IPs. User:ALIwaince(talk) 18:25, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.--Ymblanter (talk) 23:19, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi protection: Multiple vandalism by multiple unregistered IP addresses, most of them pity insult against the cricketer. --ShockWave97 (talk) 18:14, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 12 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 00:26, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued removal of sourced content by IP hopper. Jevansen (talk) 19:55, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 00:06, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: IP users have been editing the list of current members according to yesterday's election results. However, the people elected yesterday do not take office until January 2018. Instaurare (talk) 20:00, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alexf(talk) 00:33, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
Pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – This page was under pending changes previously and I think it needs to be again. There aren't many edits except for persistent inflation of sales without citing any sources or citing unreliable sources such as forum posts. Bennv3771 (talk) 15:55, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 23:17, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Full protection User request 188.29.164.162 (talk) 18:39, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @188.29.164.162: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:43, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Primefac (talk) 18:45, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk • contribs) 18:40, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The page attracts vandals once every few days, who are usually IP editors or new accounts. Suggest long-term semi-protection to prevent this persistent, although low-intensity, vandalism. The subject of the article tends to attract self-styled "jokers". Kbseah (talk) 23:01, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected indefinitely. Samsara 23:14, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Vandalism by a number of IPs. David Biddulph (talk) 17:06, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 21:27, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IPs changing the name of the mayor on this page over the past two months, and now press coverage: [44]. power~enwiki (π, ν) 20:57, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 21:26, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 21:26, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sock puppetry which has been going on for several months now. 87.201.100.192 (talk) 21:33, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 22:38, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated disruptive editing via various accounts and IPs. Sakura Cartelet Talk 21:37, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:13, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Maile66. Samsara 22:39, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Pending changes: After previous PC-protection ended in July, vandalism has still occurred, including one self-revert. Last good edit by newly registered or IP user was 24 July. --George Ho (talk) 21:44, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 22:31, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Various IP-based vandalism, including one repeatedly adding "Dilly Dilly". power~enwiki (π, ν) 21:45, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 22:33, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Especially the Turkey section is under persistent attack. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:04, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 22:30, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 22:30, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Insistent attempts to hoax that this company has been purchased when there is literally no evidence that this is true. DanielRigal (talk) 22:32, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 22:36, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
10 November 2017
Semi-protection: Repeated IP vandalism. Call me when you get the chance (We need to talk/It ain't easy) 17:24, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected - 1 year. I also reverted the article to a version from May 2017 that seems free of vandalism. Left a note on the talk page. EdJohnston (talk) 18:06, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Random vandalizing by IP users on a developing, controversial commercial topic; likely to continue indefinitely. Zefr (talk) 17:51, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alexf(talk) 21:02, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of vandalism. Janet-O (talk) 18:55, 10 November 2017 (UTC) Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Janet-O (talk) 18:55, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alexf(talk) 21:04, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – People keep adding false cast credits. They never even watch the film at all. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 18:57, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alexf(talk) 21:03, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Please downgrade the protection level back to semi-protection. See my request on the protecting admin's talk page at User talk:El C#Request to unprotect Wikipedia:Editnotice for additional details; per Special:Diff/776054990#Template:Editnotices, it seems that this page's protection level was raised in error, and the protecting admin El C had been inactive for a couple of days. Steel1943 (talk) 17:40, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected indefinitely.. yes, you're probably right about what happened. --Floquenbeam (talk) 17:52, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: User request within own user space. Iggy (talk) 21:17, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. See Wikipedia:Protection policy#User pages. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 11:55, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Recent IP vandalism; addition of nonsense content. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 02:21, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 12:00, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: There is a user who put unsourced or poorly sourced content on the article. The user put false information. Please make the protection until 1 September 2022 just like the parent article Myx. Thank you very much. Leo kingston (talk) 12:06, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 12:08, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Dee03 14:54, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 11:33, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: General reasons. ReeceTheHawk (talk) 16:48, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 11:34, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Persistent addition of unsourced content and changing sourced content. For example: [45], [46], [47], [48]. See also WT:FILM#Unsourced production companies. I'm trying to force discussion of this issue among a mix of IP editors and logged-in accounts who are edit warring to change sourced content. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 14:55, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 14:59, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long term protection due to persistent BLP vandalism. Optakeover(U)(T)(C) 12:34, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:37, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated unsourced changes to biodata in infobox by IP editors. Kbseah (talk) 12:37, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:41, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The author including some IPs repeatedly undoing the redirect. I asked the author to stop it on his talk page but there was no reply and now he’s using another IP to repeat his action. Thank you – GSS (talk|c|em) 13:11, 10 November 2017 (UTC). GSS (talk|c|em) 13:11, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:45, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism, addition of vulgarities and removal of references. AldezD (talk) 14:28, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. RickinBaltimore (talk) 14:42, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated Gurgaon -> Gurugram rename POV edits. Batternut (talk) 14:44, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:47, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. Perumalism Chat 21:48, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 11:56, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism.Perumalism Chat 21:48, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 11:58, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Recent IP vandalism; addition of nonsense content. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 02:21, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 11:59, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
Permanent pending changes (or permanent semi-protection, whichever you prefer) Every year as the yearly rivalry American football game approaches, the page gets a pretty significant amount of views, and a corresponding amount of vandalism. It would be nice to reduce the toil associated with this page. Disavian (talk) 06:35, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 12:02, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: continuous IP vandalism going back years. –72 (talk) 11:40, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 12:06, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection Request for a month until event has held as article is being vandalized.CASSIOPEIA (talk) 14:37, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 11:31, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Article is under 1RR (Syrian civil war). Ongoing content dispute with multiple editors breaching. VQuakr (talk) 20:01, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
- Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 11:37, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Protection expired on Nov 4. IP edits have only been unsourced or completely untrue since protection expired. This will probably continue until more info is released by UFC. Nihlus 20:53, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 11:38, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Immediate resume of disruptive editing by addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content in article following protection removal. livelikemusic talk! 14:20, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last edit was 12 hours ago. Report again if needed. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:31, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Repeated vandalism, recent news story. zugraga talk 19:16, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last edit was over 24 hours ago. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:35, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. - FlightTime (open channel) 23:51, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 02:14, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. TheKinkdomMan (talk) 17:36, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:02, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected. Anarchyte (work | talk) 05:32, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Three new accounts appear to have been made today just to vandalise this page. Marianna251TALK 22:50, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked. Mz7 (talk) 00:42, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – He's in the news today.[49]. – Muboshgu (talk) 03:56, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (work | talk) 05:34, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism started as immediately as the previous protection expired. —IB [ Poke ] 05:03, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (work | talk) 05:30, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
Unprotection: Page creation unprotection. Draft article already written. Notability has been conferred through Dhingra's election to the Washington State Senate. Ueutyi (talk) 19:31, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to have already been unprotected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:05, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Already unprotected. Anarchyte (work | talk) 05:32, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Same problem; IPs and logged-in editors adding unsourced production companies and blanking sourced ones. For example: [50], [51], [52], [53]. Full protection will hopefully force discussion on the talk page, which is currently being ignored. See WT:FILM#Unsourced production companies. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:03, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:05, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment) Already protected by administrator Dlohcierekim. for 2 days. 58.98.101.102 (talk) 03:39, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive editing (unsourced changes, edit warring) from multiple IP. 2603:3003:3D00:C700:B0AE:1C3E:BB45:C844, 2603:3003:3d00:c700:3532:6b7a:d451:b168. —DIYeditor (talk) 02:30, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:05, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment) Already protected by administrator Dlohcierekim. for 1 week. 58.98.101.102 (talk) 03:38, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent poorly sourced potentially defamatory material in WP:BLP article – Newly-registered editors and IP editors adding salacious material claiming article subject is second-in-command of a sex cult, citing only a blog and tabloids who in turn source from the blog. See Talk:Allison Mack#Association with NXIVM. TJRC (talk) 03:24, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment) Already protected by administrator Dlohcierekim. for 1 week. 58.98.101.102 (talk) 03:41, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- The Face (TV series) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- The Face Men Thailand (season 1) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- The Face Thailand (season 3) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Template:The Face (TV series) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary full-protection: slow edit war over between Golf-ben10 and IP editors with no one using the talk page to discuss the problems. Frietjes (talk) 13:29, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected. These pages have been semi-protected and a user blocked. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:27, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: persistent multi IP vandalism has resumed. –72 (talk) 18:14, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:18, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Ixfd64. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:34, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – 6 IPs today and yesterday. –72 (talk) 20:04, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:39, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – WP:BLP violations. -- (Radiphus) 20:34, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:03, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator K6ka. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:40, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: General. ReeceTheHawk (talk) 22:08, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 22:18, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: General / Prevention. ReeceTheHawk (talk) 22:10, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 22:17, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: General / Vandalism prevention. ReeceTheHawk (talk) 22:11, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined Seriously? There's been one edit since July and that was early September. Am I missing something? Jauerbackdude?/dude. 22:13, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: General / vandalism prevention. ReeceTheHawk (talk) 22:12, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 22:14, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism and future prevention. ReeceTheHawk (talk) 22:14, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 22:17, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – IP editors and logged-in accounts changing sourced content. See WT:FILM#Unsourced production companies. Hopefully, this will force them to discuss the matter. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 23:46, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
- Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 23:49, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: This is a redirect that has come under a lot of vandalism lately. 218.41.171.150 (talk) 23:49, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anyone wishing to change this from a redirect can make their case on the talk page. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 02:11, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary full protection Edit war over the picture in the lead. [Invitation for discussion] on talk page has been ignored and this being an older problem (which was previously discussed and not resolved decisively) means such behaviour will likely continue unless action is taken. 135.23.202.24 (talk) 23:57, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
- Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 02:16, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: General . ReeceTheHawk (talk) 16:50, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Samsara 18:05, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Fans of McConnell have been tongue-in-cheekly calling him "GOAT" (Greatest Of All Time) or otherwise comically aggrandizing his acheivements clandestinely and frequently:
- Revision as of 16:49, 9 November 2017
- Revision as of 20:32, 8 November 2017
- Revision as of 18:38, 8 November 2017
- Revision as of 22:13, 4 November 2017
- Revision as of 23:26, 14 August 2017
- Revision as of 17:44, 12 August 2017
This somewhat persistent vandalism is being done in a kind of one-upmanship by individual editors, though not as a concerted effort. To wit, multiple threads on the 76ers subreddit of this nature that encourage these edits and result in a influx of such vandalism. JesseRafe (talk) 22:09, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 22:23, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism User 261115 (talk) 22:17, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 22:26, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
11 November 2017
Request for protection. Despite of the Government recognition of the Hellenic Federation of Modern Pentathlon as responsible for Rugby League, some people from a rebel group always change the Qurrent Squad and various information. The information should be the official ones, according to the Greek Ministry of Culture and Sports. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tpantazidis (talk • contribs) 06:23, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @Tpantazidis: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 06:36, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 12:01, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Permanent semi-protection or pending changes: This biographical page was placed under Pending Changes protection following my request for semi-protection on June 20. That expired on September 20 and since then material has again been being added and removed by IPs and single-purpose accounts, particularly since the publication of the Paradise Papers. AllyD (talk) 10:42, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @AllyD: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 10:53, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 12:05, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing by unconfirmed users. Funcrunch (talk) 15:57, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:45, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
(Non-administrator comment) Already protected by administrator Samsara. 188.29.165.241 (talk)
Semi-protection: Repeated IP vandalism. On top of that, constant addition of nonsensical content. Call me when you get the chance (We need to talk/It ain't easy) 22:49, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:51, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
Full protection: High level of vandalism. 188.29.164.93 (talk) 07:05, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- Not done IP blocked and it hasn't been edited since. @72: Anarchyte (work | talk) 08:07, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- @Anarchyte: Hmmm... Thanks for the ping – this was not me. "Full protection" – wonder if it's one of the vandals on my talk page over the last few days. –72 (talk) 12:07, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Repeated additions of unsourced birthday as well as repeated changes to name (changing Joshua to Josh) with no source. Amaury (talk | contribs) 16:15, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 4 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 18:09, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 18:09, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP genre warring . - FlightTime (open channel) 17:18, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 18:11, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 18:11, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Volunteer Marek 17:29, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:15, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: on-going revert war. Someone (User:Cazzi36 in the past months and now an anonymous user) is always changing the name of the CEO. Frieda (talk) 06:07, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked: 82.46.206.216 (talk · contribs). I gave the IP 1 month block. Went with blocking because the page is not getting enough traffic. If persistent, request protection again. - Penwhale | dance in the air and follow his steps 09:02, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection. ReeceTheHawk (talk) 22:42, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Not done No reason given and I can see no reason to protect. Anarchyte (work | talk) 08:12, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. MPS1992 (talk) 02:57, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- Not done Hopefully ceased. Last edited 7 or so hours ago.Anarchyte (work | talk) 08:11, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
Creation protection: Creation protection should be applied as this page has been persistently created without any claim of significance. Pkbwcgs (talk) 10:14, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- Creation protection for Jama Masjid,Chalakpur and Jama Masjid, Chalakpur Pkbwcgs (talk) 10:25, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- Creation protected Alexf(talk) 13:02, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continued disruptive editing (moving content to article after talk page discussion's consensus not to) after previous protection. -- AlexTW 23:00, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Fully protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:56, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent block evasion by Kkm010. —MBL Talk 06:40, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:58, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent block evasion by Kkm010. —MBL Talk 06:40, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:59, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
Unprotection: Semi protection likely no longer needed. Indef since 2015. ProgrammingGeek talktome 18:42, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
- Question: Have you asked Materialscientist as per the instructions? CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 12:10, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – More trolling from an ip-hopper directed towards the subject. One IP has been reported, but the ip-hopper will find more.Crboyer (talk) 20:54, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 04:42, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. JLo-Watson (talk) 20:57, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:07, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. right after Ymblanter protected and was Okay with. - Penwhale | dance in the air and follow his steps 09:16, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- United States Senate special election in Alabama, 2017 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Pending changes: BLP policy violations – Note Special:Diff/809754289 and the high-profile nature of the article. power~enwiki (π, ν) 05:27, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I semi'd instead of PC because I feel that PC wouldn't be effective here due to enough edits occuring. - Penwhale | dance in the air and follow his steps 09:14, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent block evasion by Kkm010. —MBL [[User talk:MBlaze Lightning|Talk]] 06:44, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:06, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
Pending changes: After short semi-protection ended in September, vandalism still persists, even when it's not often edited. --George Ho (talk) 23:57, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (work | talk) 08:10, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite full protection: Requesting a salting - this used to be the old "finished" page of the article wizard, something is still leading to users creating test pages here. – Train2104 (t • c) 02:09, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- Creation protected indefinitely. Anarchyte (work | talk) 08:08, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
Creation protection: Persistent sockpuppetry by 118 alex 92.40.249.83 (talk) 07:11, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- Creation protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Semi'd. At this rate we might actually need it. Anarchyte (work | talk) 08:01, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Kiwifist (talk) 19:26, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AustralianRupert (talk) 06:39, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:37, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 04:48, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An IP hopping anon has been coming to the article to modify the lead to remove Americanized terms and other content. The team is not set to start pre-season play for at least two months and even then, experienced editors should be able to address and change requests until early April as the team is assigned players, etc. Please lock to new and anon editors until the end of February at least and preferably March 31, but any lock would discourage the current anon. Walter Görlitz (talk) 22:25, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AustralianRupert (talk) 06:52, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – General and Vandalism. ReeceTheHawk (talk) 14:07, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined I see a lot of editing but not much vandalism. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 23:35, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of IP vandalism . JMHamo (talk) 21:36, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:25, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Mattythewhite. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 04:39, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. – Muboshgu (talk) 02:36, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 03:34, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This article was very messy the first time I saw it that I had to revert to the version by Shellwood. Three users, especially AshTheGamer vandalized this article. It is already a week and nobody had realized the article was jumbled by a tornado. —Bey WHEELZ Let It RIP!✉📝Sign 04:24, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 04:32, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. 92.40.248.144 (talk) 16:19, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Outbreak of multiple vector IP and new account vandalism. --Hammersoft (talk) 01:12, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:18, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Serious BLP violations and potentially defamatory content by various IP editors. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 02:08, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of three days., after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 03:11, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
Several educational articles target by puppet-master with six socks
- HEC Paris (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Grenoble School of Management (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- University of St. Gallen (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- ESCP Europe (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- EMLYON Business School (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- ESSEC Business School (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Skema Business School (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- EDHEC Business School (Ecole des Hautes Etudes Commerciales du Nord) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- ESADE Business School (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- IE Business School (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: A sock-master using at least six different socks, all IPs or registered in the last two days, is targeting these articles with heave removal and edit warring, and a refusal to discuss. Jeppiz (talk) 19:19, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 00:00, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk • contribs) 22:11, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Alexf. Self tag. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk • contribs) 00:15, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IPs continue to change attendance figures against FIFA reports. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk • contribs) 22:35, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AustralianRupert (talk) 00:07, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. SkyWarrior 15:30, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
Please protect, more than 20 reversions have been made today in the article. The vandalisms have been made by several IP addresses. Csuja (talk) 17:16, 10 November 2017 (UTC).
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 23:45, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Pretty sure a user with multiple warring warnings is sockpuppeting using his IP to create edits (the edits are eerily similar to the changes he keeps reverting to, despite the Manuel and/or grammar not being in his favor. TropicAces (talk) 16:01, 10 November 2017 (UTC)tropicAces
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:09, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 23:46, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:09, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 23:48, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:09, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 23:49, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Tommy1933 (talk) 14:29, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 23:38, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An IP user has constantly been vandalizing this. Please semi protect for a while to stop follow on attacks. Sau226 (talk) 14:53, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 23:40, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
Repeatedly recreated, multiple AfDs, and now socks have created Draft:Rajesh Shah. Needs salting. ☆ Bri (talk) 17:51, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Just realized this may already be salted. Please disregard if this is the case. ☆ Bri (talk) 17:53, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator DGG. Clerk tagging. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk • contribs) 22:12, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
12 November 2017
Semi-protection: Persistent sock puppetry. Site-banned user User:Taokaka and User:FrozenFan2 co-coordinating. @Ad Orientem: You may want to look into this since you blocked one of the IPs there already... 172.58.41.86 (talk) 18:58, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Also added List of Thomas & Friends voice actors below as target of same sockpuppets. --‖ Ebyabe talk - Inspector General ‖ 19:38, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:10, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There have been scores of puerile edits by IPs in the past week. RolandR (talk) 19:12, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 20:32, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Target of block evading sockpuppetry . ‖ Ebyabe talk - Opposites Attract ‖ 19:35, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:10, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Recurrent long term vandalism, presumably via block evasion. 2601:188:180:11F0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 14:25, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 4 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 17:08, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistently got removed contents by IP. Requesting indefinite protection since there is pretty much no point editing this closed discussion. -★- PlyrStar93. →Message me. ← 16:29, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – BLP vios have not stopped, suggest longer protection . Tornado chaser (talk) 17:35, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:05, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment) Already protected by administrator Cullen328. for 2 weeks. 172.58.41.86 (talk) 19:15, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kkm010. —MBL Talk 05:35, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 16:05, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary Semi-protection: Persistent addition of rants, multiple IPs, likely by same person. Jim1138 (talk) 09:17, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 16:00, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of ranting by multiple IP, likely same person. Jim1138 (talk) 09:24, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 16:01, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Talk:Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive IP editor. power~enwiki (π, ν) 04:39, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked., but if return again we will likely need to protect--Ymblanter (talk) 09:33, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 05:46, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked. Recent vandalism is all from the same range, 2605:6000:6CCA:F900::/64. Range blocked for two weeks. Bishonen | talk 08:45, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Dee03 13:27, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 13:34, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 14:18, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 14:18, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kkm010. —MBL Talk 05:37, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alexf(talk) 11:20, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP and newly registred User's vandalism. A sock of blocked User:PavelStaykov is vandalizing my talk-page persistently. He is edit-warring and attacking me in Bulgarian and in English, as well on his edit-summaries. The names of the socks, he has recently registered are also with abusive meaning in Bulgarian and through them, he is attacking me too on my talk.Jingiby (talk) 09:21, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Favonian. Alexf(talk) 11:25, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Permanent template-editor protection. Widely used and "esoteric" template that is both easy to break and easy to vandalize with a negative effect on a large number of diverse pages. Given its fiddly intricacy, it would be easy to monkey with this in subtle ways that could escape detection for a long time. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ >ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ< 10:00, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Template protected for a period of infinity, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nyttend (talk) 12:29, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Temporary pending changes protection requested; unregistered editors have been persistently adding unsourced content over the past few days. As it's a rising YouTube video hopefully this will be transient. Janet-O (talk) 12:08, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Because this is a topic which is likely to attract a disproportionate number of good-faith new editors, I don't feel semi-protection is appropriate and agree that temporary PC is the way to go. ‑ Iridescent 12:23, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – As previously, unsourced future releases by various IPs and disposable accounts.
. SummerPhDv2.0 01:00, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:25, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Hummerrocket (talk) 01:31, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:32, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kkm010. —MBL Talk 05:21, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alexf(talk) 11:16, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kkm010. —MBL Talk 05:22, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alexf(talk) 11:16, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kkm010. —MBL Talk 05:22, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alexf(talk) 11:17, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kkm010. —MBL Talk 05:23, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alexf(talk) 11:17, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kkm010. —MBL Talk 05:23, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alexf(talk) 11:17, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing by unconfirmed users. Funcrunch (talk) 15:57, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Samsara 18:05, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- I respectfully request a second opinion. This article is frequently disrupted, and I argue that pending changes protection is insufficient as editors are also affected by this trans-antagonistic vandalism. This article should have the same indefinite semi-protection as was just granted to Sex and gender distinction, which draws the same repetitive "there are only 2 genders" vandalism. Funcrunch (talk) 23:33, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined by me as well. Having looked at the history, PC1 appears to be working fine, and without wanting to state the obvious semi-protection isn't going to have any effect on the rendered output of a page that's under PC1 so unless there's such a flood of disruption that it makes the reviewers' jobs impossible protection would serve no useful purpose. ‑ Iridescent 23:59, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- My point was that for trans and non-binary editors like myself, having to see "There are only 2 genders" vandalism constantly has a negative effect. With semi-protection such edits are rarely made (as they come almost exclusively from unconfirmed users), whereas with pending protection I still see them even if the general public does not. I talked about this in presentations which are linked from my user page. I don't expect a third review of this decision, I just wanted to explain my viewpoint as a long-time Wikipedia editor as well as a non-binary trans person. Funcrunch (talk) 00:58, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Sorry to sound harsh, but that's not how Wikipedia works. This is "the encyclopedia that anyone can edit", and one could make the same "it upsets me to see views that disagree from mine" argument for almost any even remotely contentious topic. Protection and in particular indefinite protection is a last resort when all else fails, not a pre-emptive measure. (Bear in mind also that Wikipedia's role is to give due balance to all views, and while "there are only two genders" may be a minority view it's hardly the preserve of a tiny clique on the lunatic fringe; if the article isn't giving due weight to the school of thought that sex=gender=chromosomes we're doing something wrong. Even on topics like Fascism, Wikipedia's article scrupulously covers the views of its supporters.) ‑ Iridescent 01:14, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Question: Iridescent and Samsara, I encourage you to reconsider this decision. First, Funcrunch is speaking to vandalism in the article (that is usually some attempt to mock folks who are non-binary), not the general viewpoint. I don't think anyone is arguing about due weight issues. Second, I reviewed the last 100 edits in the article. About one-third of them were contributions by unregistered or unconfirmed accounts at the time of editing. Nearly all of them were reverted as they constituted the kind of vandalism Funcrunch describes. Finally, pending changes is generally not a great idea for articles that get frequently edited. This isn't the most frequently edited article, and it has varied month-to-month, but it usually has been edited around 17-19 times per month in the last year, so it is active. If indefinite semi-protection is not possible, would you agree to a period of semi-protection? The article was previously semi-protected for a week in 2016, so perhaps several weeks or a month would be appropriate. I JethroBT drop me a line 02:49, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- In terms of frequency of edits, it's only the non-autoconfirmed edits that are relevant, and they're about one every five days over the last month. That's not too high for PC1. As for edits that mock the subject of an article in some way, that is a principle that applies to many, perhaps most, articles that are vandalised. But on the observation that the last edit that was kept was in May, I've granted the requested month of semi-protection. Samsara 04:31, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Question: Iridescent and Samsara, I encourage you to reconsider this decision. First, Funcrunch is speaking to vandalism in the article (that is usually some attempt to mock folks who are non-binary), not the general viewpoint. I don't think anyone is arguing about due weight issues. Second, I reviewed the last 100 edits in the article. About one-third of them were contributions by unregistered or unconfirmed accounts at the time of editing. Nearly all of them were reverted as they constituted the kind of vandalism Funcrunch describes. Finally, pending changes is generally not a great idea for articles that get frequently edited. This isn't the most frequently edited article, and it has varied month-to-month, but it usually has been edited around 17-19 times per month in the last year, so it is active. If indefinite semi-protection is not possible, would you agree to a period of semi-protection? The article was previously semi-protected for a week in 2016, so perhaps several weeks or a month would be appropriate. I JethroBT drop me a line 02:49, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Sorry to sound harsh, but that's not how Wikipedia works. This is "the encyclopedia that anyone can edit", and one could make the same "it upsets me to see views that disagree from mine" argument for almost any even remotely contentious topic. Protection and in particular indefinite protection is a last resort when all else fails, not a pre-emptive measure. (Bear in mind also that Wikipedia's role is to give due balance to all views, and while "there are only two genders" may be a minority view it's hardly the preserve of a tiny clique on the lunatic fringe; if the article isn't giving due weight to the school of thought that sex=gender=chromosomes we're doing something wrong. Even on topics like Fascism, Wikipedia's article scrupulously covers the views of its supporters.) ‑ Iridescent 01:14, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- My point was that for trans and non-binary editors like myself, having to see "There are only 2 genders" vandalism constantly has a negative effect. With semi-protection such edits are rarely made (as they come almost exclusively from unconfirmed users), whereas with pending protection I still see them even if the general public does not. I talked about this in presentations which are linked from my user page. I don't expect a third review of this decision, I just wanted to explain my viewpoint as a long-time Wikipedia editor as well as a non-binary trans person. Funcrunch (talk) 00:58, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined by me as well. Having looked at the history, PC1 appears to be working fine, and without wanting to state the obvious semi-protection isn't going to have any effect on the rendered output of a page that's under PC1 so unless there's such a flood of disruption that it makes the reviewers' jobs impossible protection would serve no useful purpose. ‑ Iridescent 23:59, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- I respectfully request a second opinion. This article is frequently disrupted, and I argue that pending changes protection is insufficient as editors are also affected by this trans-antagonistic vandalism. This article should have the same indefinite semi-protection as was just granted to Sex and gender distinction, which draws the same repetitive "there are only 2 genders" vandalism. Funcrunch (talk) 23:33, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 04:31, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple vandalism edits by various I.P's. 117.213.192.121 (talk) 03:28, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nyttend (talk) 04:20, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Simplexity22 (talk) 03:36, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nyttend (talk) 04:21, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Under the "Companions" section, Polly Thomson's birth year is listed as 1855. This is incorrect. Thomson was born in 1885. Thus, she should be listed as Polly Thomson (1885-1960). [1]
- While Find-a-Grave is not considered a reliable source in general (see WP:External links/Perennial websites), other sources confirm 1885. I've made the requested change. --joe deckertalk 00:17, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Done by Joe Decker. Anarchyte (work | talk) 00:43, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Regarding the Helen Keller update: Thank you. I appreciate you taking the time to find a more reliable source. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.181.69.15 (talk) 03:37, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Creation protection: Repeated recreation. 188.29.165.241 (talk) 20:54, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined. It was recreated once in 9 years. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:55, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing. ReeceTheHawk (talk) 22:43, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:56, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Bit of test edits, some leaning towards vandalism over the last two weeks. Page is not monitored well. – Rhinopias (talk) 00:27, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (work | talk) 00:43, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: content dispute. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 14:14, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator EdJohnston. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:47, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Lordtobi (✉) 17:28, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:49, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism and disruptive editing from IP users. Competition is one week from today and vandalism will probably subside sometime after that. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 19:18, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:53, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Every few days, a sockpuppet account set up by Giubbotto non ortodosso comes back to disruptively edit the page. It's been protected before, their accounts have been blocked, but they're clearly not going to stop making the sockpuppet accounts or trying to edit this page. I think it's time to protect the page for a bit longer. Ss112 14:35, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 22:17, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
Extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – IPs and socks edit-warring BLP violations. Dr. K. 18:30, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
By current community consensus, ECP is only used if a combination of semi and blocks have proven not to work. Samsara 22:24, 11 November 2017 (UTC)Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 22:24, 11 November 2017 (UTC)- Changing my assessment - looks like it might be a genuine dispute. Samsara 22:32, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 22:32, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Returned to disruptive editing/vandalism pretty much as soon as the last protection expired. Protection level was changed from indefinite, which allowed this to happen - needs indefinite. 4TheWynne(talk)(contribs) 22:06, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected indefinitely. Samsara 22:12, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- Preferably allow autoconfirmed users to edit as well (not just administrators), please. 4TheWynne(talk)(contribs) 22:15, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- Not sure why that happened. Fixed now. Samsara 22:18, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- Preferably allow autoconfirmed users to edit as well (not just administrators), please. 4TheWynne(talk)(contribs) 22:15, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected indefinitely. Samsara 22:18, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Ss112 13:54, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:13, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Attempts by multiple IPs to add some illegible text. Muhandes (talk) 18:25, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 22:02, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 22:02, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent addition of unsourced and fancruft material by IP and new accounts. See extensive history. Ravensfire (talk) 19:19, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 9 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 22:10, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 22:10, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Brojam (talk) 18:12, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:45, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
(Non-administrator comment) Already protected by administrator Samsara. 188.29.165.241 (talk) 20:58, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporarry semi-protection Persistent sockpuppetry and edit-warring. Jingiby (talk) 19:12, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 19:25, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Supersonic vandal is back. McSly (talk) 21:53, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 21:57, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
13 November 2017
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Ritio123 has been advised of WP:DRV, etc, but keeps reverting against AFD merge consensus, even after a 30 hour block. . ~Hydronium~Hydroxide~(Talk)~ 11:03, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked. - one week block to give them a little more time to think this through. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 13:04, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Some IP users are insisting on changing the template image to a very low quality image and is not interested in engaging in talk/discussion. . nafSadh did say 16:20, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 19:47, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing IP abuse for two days.Fury 1991 (talk) 16:52, 13 November 2017 (UTC)Fury 1991
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 19:44, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent vanity edits by sockpuppets of Qayyum Ansari. SPI at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Qayyum Ansari. Cabayi (talk) 09:08, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 09:10, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- It was declined for lack of evidence of puppetry. I've added a link to the SPI. Cabayi (talk) 12:00, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:12, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – Highly visible template - no clear reason a non-administrator would need to change it as it is a standard format icon template. . Dysklyver 13:34, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Fully protected indefinitely. fish&karate 14:49, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Just came of a Temporary semi-protection and even before the pp template was removed the same issues arose. VVikingTalkEdits 14:18, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. fish&karate 14:51, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Right after the page was unprotected, vandalism was made on it. It should be protected for an indefinite time-period. B.Lameira (talk) 04:34, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined - It's been only vandalized once. Lets wait until the level of disruption occurs at a high rate and by multiple users first, then decide if protection is necessary. Remember that we do not protect articles pre-emptively. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 06:56, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Due to the vaporware status of the game Half-Life 2: Episode 3, there have been numerous cases of disruptive editing, added unreliable sourced material, and vandalism over time.--Gabeluna27 (talk) 06:50, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 06:56, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopper who knows how to use edit summaries but doesn't discuss on talk page. 3 editors have reverted him/her but to no avail. Doug Weller talk 11:41, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 13:07, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Repeated back-&-forth BLP violations over past 3 days. : Noyster (talk), 12:58, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 13:09, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Volunteer Marek 00:50, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Multiple IPs adding the same unsourced content. GoneIn60 (talk) 04:16, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked. The IP range came back as being registered under the same school. It has been blocked for the disruptive editing being caused on this article. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 06:48, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection. Excessive vandalism from various IPs; no constructive IP edits recently. RivertorchFIREWATER 07:22, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. fish&karate 09:44, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing - Perfectly good sources, material and quotes are being deleted by user Borsoka. See page history. Why on earth he would delete primary historical material, I do not understand.
- Because WP:OR based upon WP:PRIMARY sources is prohibited in our book. Tgeorgescu (talk) 21:35, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined The reason you're stating happened over a month ago. I don't see a need to protect the article due to an edit made by a user back in October... ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 03:44, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Edit-warring by SPA accounts since February. --Ronz (talk) 00:34, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/KeyBanking. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 05:17, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP editor desiring an edit war. power~enwiki (π, ν) 01:05, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection a IP is vandalizing the page repeatedly. Gary "Roach" Sanderson (talk) 03:52, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – Article has become a magnet for POV pushers, currently being filled with OR & copyright violations, I've had to revert twice on those alone. Darkness Shines (talk) 19:49, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined Disruption and POV edits by one user aren't enough for me to protect the article; articles need to typically be undergoing a high rate of disruptive edits and by multiple users before we should consider protecting. This user just looks to either need to be educated and warned, or sanctioned if the behavior continues and educating in good faith is not successful. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 03:13, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Extend Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent removal of biographical content (full name, birth date, stepfather) by apparently-connected accounts SnoopyLinus (November 7 and 12), Snoopy20017 (November 7), Musicfactsworldwide (September 24), and 104.32.170.206 (September 18) -Yadap (talk) 19:55, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked. If disruption continues, re-file this request or let me know. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 03:22, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Category:Taiwanese people by ethnic or national origin (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent sock edits by Nipponese Dog Calvero over the past several years. -★- PlyrStar93. →Message me. ← 04:26, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I generally avoid applying indefinite protection with the exception of very rare circumstances. Lets come back in three months and re-evaluate if the protection should be extended. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 06:53, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Back under attack from User:Orchomen IP socks geolocating to the UAE. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 02:25, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Endorsing. Now under attack by another of Orchomen's IP ranges. Amaury (talk | contribs) 06:00, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Actively monitoring the article. I want to let the user exhaust more IPs so that they also can be blocked. Afterwards, I will protect the article. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 06:13, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- I just hard blocked another IP range. This should hopefully keep things under control. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 06:28, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 06:28, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- I just hard blocked another IP range. This should hopefully keep things under control. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 06:28, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Actively monitoring the article. I want to let the user exhaust more IPs so that they also can be blocked. Afterwards, I will protect the article. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 06:13, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing from several IPs. Home Lander (talk) 02:52, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I've also blocked the IP range involved with the recent edit warring made to the article. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 06:37, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection. Suddenly under heavy attack by anonymous people who seem to want to continue a fight between her fans and her non-fans from somewhere else. CityOfSilver 05:01, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 6 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 05:17, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Vandalism from supporters of one the teams involved in this derby, including changing the resluts of the matches and deleting sections. vathlu (talk) 17:19, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @Vathlu: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:20, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
I think the request can be parsed now?! vathlu (talk) 17:26, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked. Both users have been blocked for 24 hours for edit warring. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:34, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
pending changes: Multiple IP vandal is constantly adding the same unreferenced youth national teams caps and have no intention to stop:[54][55][56].Probably this is blocked user HankMoodyTZ. Shortly after last protection of this article expired he came back and put false and unreferenced info again.[57]----Oleola (talk) 17:26, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Theses diffs are of edits made months ago. If disruption gets out-of-hand and begins to occur at a high rate, please re-report. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:36, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP keeps reverting . Atsme📞📧 18:44, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined - I'm going to hold off for now, since the IP has since stopped editing the article and began participating on the talk page instead. If disruption continues, please feel free to re-report or notify me on my user talk page. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 01:03, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk • contribs) 23:57, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 05:03, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Rampant vandalism from an IP hopper who appears to be a sock-puppeteer who inserts nonsensical phrases like "Joseph Kargbo" onto the article. Last time I tried to have the page protected, I was turned down. Maybe this time will work. Call me when you get the chance (We need to talk/It ain't easy) 16:51, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Comment: The Island Def Jam Music Group is also a target of the "Joseph Kargbo" Vandal. Shearonink (talk) 17:03, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:05, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined - This particular article doesn't seem to have a high level of disruption at this time. However, after investigating the IP addresses involved with disrupting this particular article, I have protected the The Island Def Jam Music Group article, which definitely appears to have a high level of disruption and addition of unreferenced content. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:13, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. JDDJS (talk) 22:37, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 04:18, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article still gets vandalized frequently, despite already having PC-protection. . –Miles Edgeworth Talk 23:47, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I typically avoid indefinite protection on articles with limited exceptions. After the protection expires in six months, lets re-evaluate and determine if protection needs to be extended. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 04:19, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced content by several IPs, particularly one with who likes to type snarky little edit summaries. Ss112 21:41, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- The aforementioned IP also likes to remove legit content for no valid reason. Snuggums (talk / edits) 21:49, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Sock puppetry has also begun. Can DMacks (who blocked one of the IPs) or another admin please semi-protect the page ASAP? Snuggums (talk / edits) 23:04, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:38, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Alexf. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 03:45, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ReeceTheHawk (talk) 22:27, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 12 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 03:48, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Class455 (talk|stand clear of the doors!) 22:30, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 03:50, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent vanity edits by sockpuppets of Qayyum Ansari. Cabayi (talk) 09:50, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined Not so fast. Only a few edits have occurred on this article in the past few days. What evidence shows that this is sock puppetry and for a disruptive purpose? ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 23:12, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked. 92.40.248.235 (talk) 11:03, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined The responses that this IP is making here and here, while clearly an argument that appears heated, are not what constitutes the abuse of one's own talk page after being blocked. Even if this were the case, the proper procedure for this is to file a report at AIV and make a note that the block should be modified and talk page access needs to be revoked - not to protect the IP's talk page. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 23:15, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Persistent reference of a racist term by vandals. Niger itself has been semi protected since 2010. 94.197.120.53 (talk) 14:54, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined It doesn't seem like a high level of IP vandalism is ongoing here. The only recent vandalism I see was made today, which has been reverted and rev del'd (for good reason). If that changes, please re-file. If I missed something, let me know. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 23:23, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: edit warring by a user who does not want to understand neither WP:PARAPHRASE, nor WP:DUE. Borsoka (talk) 18:35, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Rgvis, Borsoka: I will note and give warning that you both were each within a very close breadth of being blocked for edit warring and violating Wikipedia's three-revert rule. The reason I did not was because the edit warring seemed to have recently stopped, and Borsoka had not received a warning on his talk page for edit warring on the article (which I have now left). Both of you need to understand that edit warring is not acceptable, even in cases where you know and believe yourself and your revision(s) to be absolutely correct and the other editor not. Please discuss this issue on the article's talk page, and please be more careful next time. I definitely don't want to be the bad guy over something silly such as this :-). I wish you both well and that you resolve the dispute peacefully. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:48, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Oshwah, thank you for your action. Please remember that "Removal of clear copyright violations" is exempt from the edit-warring policy. Please also remember that I tried to discuss the issue on the article Talk page from the beginning, but I did not receive any real answer. Borsoka (talk) 01:08, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Borsoka - I see. I didn't know that this issue was in regards to the removal of copyrighted content; if this is indeed the case, please accept my apologies and forgive me. I was not aware of this, and if that detail had been added to this request, I would have made a different statement here and at the WP:AN3 report you filed ;-). Let me review the content with this information in-mind and see if anything needs to be redacted. Thank you for responding here and for bringing this to my attention. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 01:17, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Oshwah, please also review the text mentioned in this edit ([58]). Rgvis claims that my text also violates WP:PARAPHRASE. I think this is not the case, but I would be grateful, if it were checqued. Thank you for your action. Borsoka (talk) 01:23, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Looking at the page history, it looks like the user has attempted to cite references with the content added (Example diff), but it does appear that the content added might to be paraphrased. I'll leave my judgment here as-is while acknowledging your basis for reverting; as I indicated, the article is now fully protected, which is the main basis for this particular noticeboard. I'll leave it to you both to discuss and resolve the matter peacefully :-). Please let me know if you have questions or concerns, or if you need additional assistance. I'll be more than happy to help if it is needed. Again, I appreciate your follow-up response here, Borsoka. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 01:33, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Oshwah, if my understanding is correct, if I copy texts from books, but I add a reference at the end of each sentence, I do not violate any copyright. For instance, Sedlar, in his cited book, says: "Herders and peasants by occupation, the Vlachs occupied the lowest rung of the social ladder, superior only to slaves. They suffered the additional disability of adherence to Eastern Orthodoxy, which in predominantly Catholic Hungary was considered a deviant and sometimes even a heretical form of Christianity." Rgvis, writes: "The Romanians suffered the additional disability of adherence to the Eastern Orthodoxy, which in predominantly Catholic Hungary was considered a deviant and sometimes even a heretical form of Christianity. They occupied the lowest rung of the social ladder, superior only to slaves." Similarly, Seton-Watson writes: the Vlachs "were still on a footing of equality", while Rgvis' text is the following: "At the end of the 13th century, they were still on a footing of equality with the other three privileged groups". Could I also copy texts from books in the future if I provide references? Borsoka (talk) 01:50, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Borsoka: I'm not an expert on all things copyright nor am I 100% familiar with all situations that would warrant something a copyright violation (I'm proficient with the obvious stuff), so don't quote anything I say in this response here (haha).
- Oshwah, if my understanding is correct, if I copy texts from books, but I add a reference at the end of each sentence, I do not violate any copyright. For instance, Sedlar, in his cited book, says: "Herders and peasants by occupation, the Vlachs occupied the lowest rung of the social ladder, superior only to slaves. They suffered the additional disability of adherence to Eastern Orthodoxy, which in predominantly Catholic Hungary was considered a deviant and sometimes even a heretical form of Christianity." Rgvis, writes: "The Romanians suffered the additional disability of adherence to the Eastern Orthodoxy, which in predominantly Catholic Hungary was considered a deviant and sometimes even a heretical form of Christianity. They occupied the lowest rung of the social ladder, superior only to slaves." Similarly, Seton-Watson writes: the Vlachs "were still on a footing of equality", while Rgvis' text is the following: "At the end of the 13th century, they were still on a footing of equality with the other three privileged groups". Could I also copy texts from books in the future if I provide references? Borsoka (talk) 01:50, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Looking at the page history, it looks like the user has attempted to cite references with the content added (Example diff), but it does appear that the content added might to be paraphrased. I'll leave my judgment here as-is while acknowledging your basis for reverting; as I indicated, the article is now fully protected, which is the main basis for this particular noticeboard. I'll leave it to you both to discuss and resolve the matter peacefully :-). Please let me know if you have questions or concerns, or if you need additional assistance. I'll be more than happy to help if it is needed. Again, I appreciate your follow-up response here, Borsoka. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 01:33, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Oshwah, please also review the text mentioned in this edit ([58]). Rgvis claims that my text also violates WP:PARAPHRASE. I think this is not the case, but I would be grateful, if it were checqued. Thank you for your action. Borsoka (talk) 01:23, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Borsoka - I see. I didn't know that this issue was in regards to the removal of copyrighted content; if this is indeed the case, please accept my apologies and forgive me. I was not aware of this, and if that detail had been added to this request, I would have made a different statement here and at the WP:AN3 report you filed ;-). Let me review the content with this information in-mind and see if anything needs to be redacted. Thank you for responding here and for bringing this to my attention. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 01:17, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Oshwah, thank you for your action. Please remember that "Removal of clear copyright violations" is exempt from the edit-warring policy. Please also remember that I tried to discuss the issue on the article Talk page from the beginning, but I did not receive any real answer. Borsoka (talk) 01:08, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- However, I believe that if you copy word-for-word from any reference or source, you have to put what was directly copied inside quotations. In certain situations, content also needs to be licensed and its copyright information clearly known and stated on the source that doing this is okay (assuming such content is owned by the reference), unless this information is public domain or otherwise proven as okay to be directly copied like this. In situations where copying word-for-word from a source may be okay, we can't copy word-for-word in every situation. In your particular example above, I don't believe that I would anticipate an issue coming back to bite you (again, I'm not 100% certain - you'll need to check the policies and verify this). But in other cases out there in a general sense (say for example, someone copying... song lyrics from a recent song directly from a book) this would be a completely different story.
- I can say this for sure, though: we define copyright policies and provide the appropriate guidelines and with a strict expectation that they be followed so that all situations are covered and Wikipedia doesn't put itself at risk for issues in this aspect. In the end, this noticeboard is about addressing concerns regarding the need to apply page protection on articles. Due to the back-and-fourth reverting (as reported here), I have elected to fully protect until these questions are answered and the issues resolved. Your questions regarding copyrights would be best asked at Wikipedia:Copyright questions, where editors and administrators more vested and experienced in this area would be able to help you. Please let me know if you have any more questions regarding this report and my decision to apply protection to the article involved, and I'll be happy to answer them. Again, I appreciate your follow-up responses and questions. I'll do what I can to properly assist you, or (if anything) at least direct you to a place where you'll receive that assistance. Best -- ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 02:13, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent edit-warring without any attempt at participation in Talk; this has now escalated to outright vandalism. ElKevbo (talk) 19:29, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 01:44, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection IP from Brown University keeps adding an infobox to this featured article despite there being no consensus for the box. I've reverted twice. We hope (talk) 21:33, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 03:24, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Wikipedia:Vandalism Vandalism in ending production year and seventh generation production year. There are many users changing the models years over time from 2017, 2018, and present. MTSRider18(talk) 18:42, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:50, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Socks/meat puppets persistently inflating a group's sales number against what the cited source says. Bennv3771 (talk) 19:01, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 01:09, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Unprotection: Extended-confirmed might be too much for this page. Thoughts? For the record, I contacted the protecting admin a few days ago. WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 02:08, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- Comment: Looks like the reason this page has extended-confirmed protection is because it was the target of autoconformed sockpuppets creating disruptive edits that needed to be suppressed. Steel1943 (talk) 15:05, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- Comment. It appears there has been chronic vandalism from many autoconfirmed socks at that article, and EC protection looks about right to me. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 21:34, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- Not done. Favonian (talk) 20:57, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. —MBL Talk 05:10, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked., and it is generally good to leave this unprotected and just block the IPs who clearly indicate by editing this page who they are.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:20, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Req: 3 month semi-protection. The short story: India's top-notch entertainment journals (he said sarcastically) couldn't agree on how much this film made, and there are a lot of people who keep monkeying with the financial figures in the article, either because they believe the super-inflated ₹600 crore (aka 6 billion rupees) figure, or because they want to be impish. See these 5 edits, this, this, this, this, this, this, etc. Though I've never seen this film, nor do I actually care about Indian films, I did participate in discussions about how the gross should be presented. I don't know if that makes me involved or not, but that's why I'm requesting page protection instead of doing it myself. Thanks,. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:38, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – PC isn't cutting it. So much vandalism and disruption over his firing is present today. . Hummerrocket (talk) 18:27, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:38, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent WP:BLP violations by 175.103.25.178 92.40.248.197 (talk) 09:44, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked. This is clearly a content dispute and with a reliable source involved. Protection may be necessary if it continues after the block, but an edit warring block and notice will hopefully suffice for now. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 23:06, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- (edit conflict) Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This looks like a content dispute that has turned into edit warring between IPs. It needs to be resolved on the talk page. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:09, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Repeatedly created - see Shameel Done (Student). Cahk (talk) 10:14, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Lots of spam and trolling edits. TropicAces (talk) 14:33, 12 November 2017 (UTC)tropicAces
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., and...
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 23:19, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Dynamic IP changing colours to ones that violate WP:COLOR. -- AlexTW 06:23, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 22:58, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Vandalism and Hoax edits by User:Bertrand101 IP Sock. LG-Gunther : Talk 09:35, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:02, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent editing to alter birthplace. SPI at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Qayyum Ansari. Cabayi (talk) 09:41, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:04, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion by User:Daniel C. Boyer, multiple IPs. Binksternet (talk) 05:34, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 22:52, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – repeated vandalism about job status. ‖ Ebyabe talk - Border Town ‖ 19:45, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:04, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Qzd (talk) 20:56, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:02, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
14 November 2017
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Getting targeted by vandals over the past few days. -- 🎼Yexstorm2001🎼 (talk) 20:30, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- That's a massive understatement. Had to go way back to find an edit that wasn't vandalism, and even reverting to that failed. Had to piece together what was real and what wasn't by looking at the sources on the page. Gatemansgc (talk) 20:47, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 20:54, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Pending-changes: Community leaders including me (the current maintainer of the page) wish to work on the community page and to avoid some vandalism, we wish the page is protected with pending review so changes on the page is reviewed before acceptance. Alangi Derick (talk) 20:35, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:47, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks once more for your reaction towards this issue TonyBallioni. If this is the case, then I will just rest the issue. --Alangi Derick (talk) 21:01, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- Requesting immediate archiving... CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 23:00, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Lordtobi (✉) 20:49, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Should probably be longer, but that will get things started. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 20:52, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Please also note the potential socking. . Callmemirela 🍁 talk 18:56, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 19:01, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Automated comment: @Dlohcierekim: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:18, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Chase (talk | contributions) 18:58, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. content dispute includes autoconfirmed users -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 19:05, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
RE: World War II -Semi-protected edit request on 13 September 2017/Suggestion for text outlining creation of Office of the Coordinator of Inter-American Affairs
ATTENTION EDITORS: Kindly reconsider and/or review this request for the addition of new text as outlined in the discussion shown below in light of the additional primary source material now available at the United States National Archive online reference as described in the following reply which was posted to the talk page of User:Nick-D (See the talk page for World War II). Many thanks in advance for your thoughtful consideration. Respectfully, 104.207.219.150 (talk) 18:09, 9 November 2017 (UTC)PS
- Hello Nick-D;
- Many thanks for your comments regarding the proposed changes to the article World War II as described on the article's talk page (See Below).
- While it is possible that the suggested additional content is irrelevant or largely unimportant as you suggest, I thought that you might enjoy reviewing an example of primary source material from the United States National Archive before dismissing the proposed content entirely. The original source material indicates that President Franklin Delano Roosevelt established the Office of the Coordinator for Inter-American Affairs as part of a broader strategy for preventing Germany, Italy and Spain from establishing a military presence in South and Central America. In addition, it illustrates actions taken by Nelson Rockefeller to implement this strategy during the 1940s. I hope that you enjoy reviewing the material and that you are able to share it with your fellow editors in order to ensure the highest degree of accuracy in the article. See the following link for further reading. Thanks again for your input and best wishes for your continued success on Wikipedia.. Regards 72.69.152.90 (talk) 01:24, 9 November 2017 (UTC)JJ See Records of the Office of Inter-American Affairs at the U.S. National Archive Online at www.archives.gov [1]
- Kindly consider amending Section 4.0 Course of the war/4.2 Western Europe shown below to include additional text outlining Roosevelt's creation of the Office of the Coordinator of Inter-American Affairs
- Although Roosevelt had promised to keep the United States out of the war, he nevertheless took concrete steps to prepare for war. In December 1940 he accused Hitler of planning world conquest and ruled out negotiations as useless, calling for the US to become an "arsenal of democracy" and promoted the passage of Lend-Lease aid to support the British war effort.[101] In January 1941 secret high level staff talks with the British began for the purposes of determining how to defeat Germany should the US enter the war. They decided on a number of offensive policies, including an air offensive, the "early elimination" of Italy and Spain, raids, support of resistance groups, and the capture of positions to launch an offensive against Germany.[108]
- Additional text (or an additional paragraph) might be included at the end of the paragraph shown above to outline additional steps taken by Roosevelt to prepare for the war while also encouraging the peaceful resolution of conflict:
- By July of 1941, Roosevelt also authorized the creation of the Office of the Coordinator of Inter-American Affairs, in an effort to respond to German, Italian and Spanish propaganda in Latin America through the use of news, film and radio broadcast media. In the process, Roosevelt also sought to enhance his Good Neighbor policy, promote Pan-Americanism and forestall military hostility through the use of cultural diplomacy. [2]
References
Media Sound & Culture in Latin America. Editors: Bronfman, Alejanda & Wood, Andrew Grant. University of Pittsburg Press, Pittsburg, PA, USA, 2012, Pgs. 41-54 ISBN 978-0-8229-6187-1 books.google.com See Pgs. 41-54 [2]
- ^ Anthony, Edwin D. Records of the Office of Inter-American Affairs. National Archives and Record Services--General Services Administration, Washington, D.C. 1973 P. 1-9 Library of Congress No. 73-600146 Records of the Office of Inter-American Affairs at The National Archive Online at www.archives.gov
- ^ Media Sound & Culture in Latin America. Editors: Bronfman, Alejanda & Wood, Andrew Grant. University of Pittsburg Press, Pittsburg, PA, USA, 2012, Pg. 49 ISBN 978-0-8229-6187-1 books.google.com See pg. 49
- Declined. I have suggested this on the article's talk page for you, I don't want to make the edit myself as I don't know enough about this subject to make a value judgement. fish&karate 14:36, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 13:44, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. - one IP editor has vandalised the article once, that's not really what protection is for. fish&karate 14:21, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ― Avriliza (talk) 13:59, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. You seem to be engaged in a content dispute, that is not vandalism. Please do not misuse the term Vandalism. fish&karate 14:23, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Tips keep adding unsourced set lists. — Calvin999 17:31, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:47, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent daily vandalism, repeatedly reverted, over several days from various IPv6 addresses assigned to the same telco (so probably the same person) and one IPv4. David Brooks (talk) 17:58, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 18:11, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing, persisting after end of previous protection. 2601:188:180:11F0:F11B:E449:55C1:762E (talk) 15:56, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 17:14, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – One (or more users) insists on turning this article into an extenstion of NIST's own site, probable copyvios in addition to placing external links as section headings for instance. JesseRafe (talk) 15:59, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 17:16, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: An ip has started edit-warring the day the previous protection expired. --Ronz (talk) 16:10, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. As it was before, so it is now. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 17:21, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: POV pushing by an IP hopper. Three days should suffice. Ymblanter (talk) 16:35, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- No, they seem to be determined, may be a week?--Ymblanter (talk) 16:44, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 17:22, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection vandalism and socking[59]. Capitals00 (talk) 16:57, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 17:24, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: BLP policy violations – Looking at the page history there seem to be periodical spates every fortnight or so by different users/IPs. Janet-O (talk) 12:30, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection:Persistent vandalism and introduction of frivolous material between warring IP editors. Mystic Technocrat (talk) 15:18, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:45, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism has resumed with thanksgiving nearing, popular target of school aged editors. WNYY98 (talk) 15:31, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:50, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – high visibility page, long history of vandalism as well as high level of IP disruption. . –72 (talk) 18:41, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
{{RFPP|semi|indef}}
Not seeing the need for ECP in recent history. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 18:49, 13 November 2017 (UTC)- @SarekOfVulcan: Your protection was only for a few days not indefinitely as in your response? I had requested indef pending changes to combat the potential disadvantages of an indef semi whilst also retaining the advantages of a long term protection. I had not requested extended confirmed as you alluded. –72 (talk) 19:30, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, yes, I confused PC and ECP. I'll fix the duration and apply PC. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 19:35, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- @SarekOfVulcan: Your protection was only for a few days not indefinitely as in your response? I had requested indef pending changes to combat the potential disadvantages of an indef semi whilst also retaining the advantages of a long term protection. I had not requested extended confirmed as you alluded. –72 (talk) 19:30, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Automated comment: @SarekOfVulcan: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:58, 13 November 2017 (UTC)- Checked, seems to be working properly. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 20:19, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- @SarekOfVulcan: You used
{{RFPP|semi}}
so the bot is looking for semi-protection and isn't finding any.—CYBERPOWER (Chat) 14:27, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- @SarekOfVulcan: You used
- Checked, seems to be working properly. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 20:19, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Abuse of multiple IP addresses to violate NPOV. Janet-O (talk) 11:28, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. 2601:188:180:11F0:F11B:E449:55C1:762E (talk) 15:44, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Oshwah. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:18, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Inline icon templates by shape and color
- Template:Resbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Resolved mark large (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Implemented (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:PImplemented (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Resolved mark (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Accepted (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Checked2 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Verified (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Conditional yes (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Tallyho (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Blockedtaggedclosing (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Helped (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Donetask (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Unprod (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Autp (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Responded (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Merge done (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Marked (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Yes check (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Y& (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Expired (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Xmark (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Not done not likely (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Stale-small (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Smallrejected (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:No mark (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:No pass (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Fail (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:N& (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:X mark-n (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Xed box (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Cancelled (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Deleted-image (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Already declined (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Opblocked (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:User-blocked (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Notabug (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Notfixed (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Won't fix (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Withdraw (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Nojoy (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Resolved1 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Check mark-n (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Checked box (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Yellow tick (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Half done (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Partly done (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Partly done-t (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Semi-done (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Fixed by reporter (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Bug pending (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Bug resolved (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Blockedwithouttags (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Ipbedone (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Pblock (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Psblock (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Rblock (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Close (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Denied (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Disagree (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:NotBug (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Duplicate bug (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:No action (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Nocomment (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Nc (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Removed (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Posted (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Works for me (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Decline-IP (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Cu-endorsed (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:N/A icon (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Bug closed (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Bug new (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:GA2ndopinion (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Deferabusefilter (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Deferblack (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Defermetablack (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Deferrsn (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:PendingRequest (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:GAOnHold (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:OnHoldUntil (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:ProposalOnHold (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Reviewing request (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Awaitingadmin (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Await (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Later (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Tobedone (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Discussing (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Isdoing (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Started (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Checking (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:NeedsDiscussion (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Note2 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Bug assigned (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:High priority (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:N.b. (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Bang (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Archive now (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:CUnote (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Bug acknowledged (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Bug confirmed (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Remind (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Remark (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Clerk-Note-bot (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Rollbacker-Note (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Editor-Note (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Renamer note (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Coordinator-note (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Suggestion (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Question mark (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:InfoNeeded (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Not sure (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Notsure (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Investigating (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Bug feedback (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Bulb2 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Idea (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:NewProposal (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Sorry (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Wikithanks (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Thumbs down (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Thumbs up (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Dislike (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Awaiting (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Commentvote (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Bug dupe (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Clerk-Note-merged (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:NewBug (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:BugFixed (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:DuplicateProposal (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Moved to commons (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Orz (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Possibly (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Read (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Redflag (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Redundant symbol (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Reopened (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Reverted (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Twomanrule (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:UnderReview (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Scissors (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Self-trout (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Sent (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Snow (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Stale GAN (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:SULcheck (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:ToDo (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Undone (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Warnsign (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Withdrawn (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Working (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:WPcrystalball (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Sblock (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Impossible (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Possilikely (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Megaphoneduck (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Nosleepers (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Behaviour (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
- Template:Pixiedust (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Done
Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – Highly visible templates - no clear reason a non-administrator would need to change them as they is a standard format icon templates used in (often-critical) processes.
I don't want to spam the RPP request page over time, so I have listed them all at once, so could you please template protect all the templates listed. Many critical marking templates like Endorsed by a checkuser are not protected, and this could potentially be a problem if some vandal realized this. (note: some may already be done, I basically just copied the list from the documentation after randomly checking a few and finding they were unprotected). Dysklyver 14:34, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:42, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- clerking removed all the protected pages. Primefac (talk) 14:57, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks. Dysklyver 14:59, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- I've template-editor-protected everything up to (appropriately) Template:Semi-done (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs), about 1/3 of the way down the list. I will carry on tomorrow if someone else hasn't, I've run out of time to carry on for today. fish&karate 15:19, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks. Dysklyver 14:59, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Template protected (indef) (For the bot.) AlexiusHoratius 23:14, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- @AlexiusHoratius: not sure if this is deliberate, but the following three pages above have not been protected (Template:Commentvote, Template:Wikithanks, Template:Nc). I think the bot may point this out, but not which exact pages are affected. –72 (talk) 23:22, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks - I missed those as they were redirects. They should all be done now. AlexiusHoratius 23:41, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- @AlexiusHoratius: not sure if this is deliberate, but the following three pages above have not been protected (Template:Commentvote, Template:Wikithanks, Template:Nc). I think the bot may point this out, but not which exact pages are affected. –72 (talk) 23:22, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @AlexiusHoratius: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:29, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- Alright I give up - I checked through everything and I couldn't find what's unprotected. If someone else wants to take a look - go ahead. AlexiusHoratius 02:39, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- May have been the tallyho redirect, which was edit protected but not move protected. I’ve done that now. Maybe that’ll sort it? fish&karate 08:06, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- Let's see:
- Alright I give up - I checked through everything and I couldn't find what's unprotected. If someone else wants to take a look - go ahead. AlexiusHoratius 02:39, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- Template protected (indef) (For the bot again.) fish&karate 11:05, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @Fish and karate: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 11:16, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- Which ones you foppish bot? fish&karate 14:14, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- Apparently it's because some are fully protected rather than template protected. Let's try this one:
- Done (para los bot) fish&karate 14:26, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – edit warrior trying to implement his inferior graphics as lead image over historical image currently in use. Denniss (talk) 09:34, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:22, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term IP vandalism. Widefox; talk 10:01, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:23, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated vandalism (factual inaccuracies) from multiple IPs. agtx 14:21, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 14:22, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. LG-Gunther : Talk 06:07, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:08, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary full-protection: - Until edit dispute has been solved at talk page. Reverts and edit wars over several days.--BabbaQ (talk) 09:11, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism, introduction of unsourced material/factual errors. Boomer VialHolla! We gonna ball! 09:31, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:20, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Currently linked as first link from Google doodle. Lots of IP vandalism. Shenme (talk) 05:35, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 08:40, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Large amount of IP and new user vandalism. May merit pending changes protection, as vandalism is unlikely to go down any time soon. ‖ Ebyabe talk - Repel All Boarders ‖ 08:36, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 08:47, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- Critical Role (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Matthew Mercer (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Critical Role has been semi-protected two consecutive times this October for persistent disruptive editing from an/ IP-hopping vandal/s. Matthew Mercer was semi-protected once for a week for the same reason. After the pages were unprotected, the vandal/s has/have been continuing their disruption. Ermahgerd9 (talk) 08:43, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week and two weeks respectively, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 08:37, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- Thank you very much. Ermahgerd9 (talk) 08:43, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week and two weeks respectively, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 08:37, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:37, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- Endorse request: IP-hopping vandal keeps edit-warring BLP violations sourced to blog/Twitter. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 00:41, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined I'm going to hold off on applying page protection for now. I've talked to the IP, and I don't see any further disruptive. If this changes, file another report or let me know. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 01:42, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Vandalism and disruptive editing by IP's and a new registered user, removing large chunks of content and references. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 04:27, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:50, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: for one month. New article about someone trendy in India; article is getting pounded by IPs adding unsourced fancruft. Jytdog (talk) 04:52, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 08:06, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Temporary semi-protection, repeatedly vandalism. Rhinen 15:40, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:50, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Temporary semi-protection, repeatedly vandalism. Rhinen 15:41, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:50, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Digifan23 (talk) 19:48, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined I don't think that the rate of disruption is occurring at a high enough rate to warrant a need to protect the article at this time. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:51, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: vandalism. 2600:1:F113:5710:600F:CA42:4A56:13F (talk) 20:45, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @2600:1:F113:5710:600F:CA42:4A56:13F: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:58, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:52, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – Seems users on Reddit are pushing an idea to change the genre to "pay-to-win". jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk • contribs) 01:09, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. There are many various disputes and borderline edit wars between different users and in different areas. This article needs a "full stop" with a gold lock on the front gate for a bit so that all users involved will discuss these disputes and come to a resolution. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 01:46, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of recent vandalism from several IPs. Name goes here (talk | contribs) 01:43, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 02:00, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/House of the Wolf Man (2nd nomination) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Nsmutte disruption. Home Lander (talk) 02:39, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The protection will last throughout the duration of the AFD discussion, so you should be all set here :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 04:18, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Unreferenced controversial content, and vandalism. Simplexity22 (talk) 02:50, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 04:19, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruption by unregistered users, including BLP violations. –FlyingAce✈hello 21:50, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:14, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Number 57. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:52, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Related vandalism from the Star Wars Battlefront II (2017 video game) controversy. Classicwiki (talk) (ping me please) 23:34, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:14, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Dlohcierekim. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:53, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – IP socks of banned user ProfessorJane repeatedly adding unsourced content. Page has been protected multiple times before. Zanhe (talk) 00:20, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I add indefinite protection to articles in very rare circumstances. Let's re-evaluate the article after the protection I applied expires. If we need to extend it, that's a task very easily done. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:55, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Very extensive (and offensive) edit warring. Given the sensitive subject, I suggest a month rather than a week.Jeppiz (talk) 20:17, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 23:21, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection:, persistent vandalism, some edits offensive groig (talk) 20:52, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Maile (talk) 23:01, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk • contribs) 23:20, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 23:39, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Subject of article has apparently been undergoing turmoil for a while, and is receiving edits by IPs seeking to use WP to further damage reputation by adding repeated unsourced (or dubiously sourced) allegations. See most recent edit. Echoedmyron (talk) 16:11, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Someone not involved should look at it with eye toward reversion and perhaps rev del, -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 19:58, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Temp. semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. The today featured article should be protected until the next day. Matthew_hk tc 16:21, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:03, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Sudden spree of excessive IP vandalism. Entranced98 (talk) 20:50, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Maile (talk) 22:55, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
15 November 2017
Semi-protection: Persistent section blanking following a televised BBC investigation into the college broadcast on national television in the UK. Section blankers may or may not have a relationship with the College. Freeknowledger (talk) 16:51, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @Freeknowledger: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:52, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 17:50, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. INeedSupport (talk) 18:04, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 18:28, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs persistently making disruptive edits. Bennv3771 (talk) 18:17, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 18:30, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Over the past week there have been spates of both constructive and problematic edits from different IP addresses. I think semi-protecting the page isn't a good starting point because it may ward off potentially constructive users interested in Spanish issues but considering the situation in Catalonia and the BLP implications, a pending changes protection period may be in order. Janet-O (talk) 15:39, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:52, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:52, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
Template editor protection: High use template; currently about 2,500 transclusions, but it has been rising as the database catches up with this newly created module that supports a set of templates. (Some of the templates it supports, such as Template:Species list, already have some degree of protection.) Peter coxhead (talk) 17:00, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
- Template protected indefinitely. Samsara 17:16, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – 5 IPs in the last couple of days. –72 (talk) 17:11, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Enigmamsg 17:22, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 10:54, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alexf(talk) 12:05, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism. Bennv3771 (talk) 11:16, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 11:36, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Oshwah. Alexf(talk) 12:06, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
- User talk:(TIB1236MTIB1237KTIB1239ETIB1240ATIB1241YTIB1243STIB1244PTIB1245LTIB1246GTIB1247G) (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
Unprotection: I intend to add sockpuppetry tag per Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/118 alex . Thanks, 115.66.246.66 (talk) 03:00, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
- Done On the user page (which is where they go). Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:21, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism. Boomer VialHolla! We gonna ball! 04:11, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
- Some IP contributions were in good faith, but predominantly either cosmetic or misguided. Samsara 08:58, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 08:58, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Kosack (talk) 07:31, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 08:23, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 08:23, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism, personal attacks two IPs, same person Jim1138 (talk) 07:55, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 08:29, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 08:29, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP trolls have been coming out of the woodworks to cause trouble. Crboyer (talk) 05:10, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:50, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator MusikAnimal. Samsara 08:10, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Passionate IP editor will not use the talk page; changing content settled by extremely long discussion at the talk page. Jytdog (talk) 06:32, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 08:18, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: High level of disruptive editing by IP users. – Sabbatino (talk) 06:42, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected indefinitely. Samsara 08:18, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from anonymous users, mainly dealing with the band member's names. Bowling is life (talk) 03:04, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:49, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism/intentional blanking. Boomer VialHolla! We gonna ball! 03:40, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:50, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. —MRD2014 Talk • Edits • Help! 03:45, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 04:20, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator K6ka.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:51, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ‖ Ebyabe talk - Attract and Repel ‖ 03:50, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:52, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent sock farm attempting to inject WP:COPYVIO WP:SPAM into the article. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 20:11, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The only time IPs ever make helpful edits here is when they're undoing vandalism committed by other IPs. JDDJS (talk) 23:11, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 23:48, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Home Lander (talk) 01:20, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — MusikAnimal talk 05:31, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry. Binksternet (talk) 20:51, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:52, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – And this isn't just today either. This has been long term since October. . Hummerrocket (talk) 21:38, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:54, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent unsourced changes. Jetstreamer Talk 22:40, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:55, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Snuggums (talk / edits) 22:42, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:49, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:57, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – IP editor persistently attempting to add unreferenced section on "Conspiracy" with external Youtube links, despite being warned. Kbseah (talk) 22:49, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:58, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP editors and new editors adding joke entries to "notable alumni" to a high school article. Kbseah (talk) 22:55, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:59, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent primary research/vandalism by IP user. Zefr (talk) 20:05, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:42, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism, WP:BLP violations. 2601:188:180:11F0:F11B:E449:55C1:762E (talk) 20:20, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:45, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary Semi-protection: Page has attracted attention of vandals in current EA controversy. At least one such edit has been shown off on Reddit. See also Star Wars Battlefront II (2017 video game) which is now protected for similar reasons, as I understand it. draeath (talk) 20:25, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:34, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- Looks like this was done after my request was submitted. Please disregard (unsure if I should just remove this from the list?) draeath (talk) 22:06, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Ferret. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:46, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – More subtle vandalism. Nihlus 20:32, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:48, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
16 November 2017
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Same as above . 331dot (talk) 18:05, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 yesr, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 21:16, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Same as above . 331dot (talk) 18:06, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 21:20, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. 2601:188:180:11F0:F907:E55:8BEA:B132 (talk) 18:47, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 21:24, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Binksternet (talk) 16:21, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
- Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 21:00, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi protection edit warring. Capitals00 (talk) 16:39, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 21:02, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of spam and vandalism since 2 days, always adding the same irrelevant informations. It's always the same texts about accusation without any trial. At the creation of the article, question was asked about the accusations and because of the non judgement, it was not relevant and against WP's rule to add it. Since 2 days a4 vandalisms have been made on the page. MangoZona (talk) 16:49, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 21:05, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
Full protection: The potentially libelous claim that this person is a white nationalist keeps being restored, despite no cited references even making that claim, and in violation of WP:BLPREQUESTRESTORE by not seeking consensus nor improving sources. The fact that this Wikipedia article is being cited in recent press makes protection important. --notJackhorkheimer (talk / contribs) 17:12, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
- Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 21:08, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Sock of blocked user Cebr1979 is back targeting the page. 331dot (talk) 17:58, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 21:11, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Same as above. 331dot (talk) 18:04, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 21:13, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Vandalism and disruptive editing by multiple IP's. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 05:02, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined - Edits are being made by a person under an IP range. Two reverts were made to remove those edits, by no warnings were left on either IP's talk pages. If they're doing something wrong, why aren't we warning them? Page protection is not a method that should be used in place of communication. Talk to the users or warn them; if it keeps occurring, we can begin considering page protection starting from there. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 05:08, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
- Comment. Those two reverts were not the only recent disruptive edits. Warnings had indeed been given for other acts of vandalism in November, including at the link [60] and the offensive vandalism at [61]. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 05:42, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
- They're not all the same IP, one warning does not cover them all. fish&karate 11:45, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – User:Nixiao1983 refused to explain his rationale or motive behind his recent edits and also refused to engage in consensus-building besides engaging in personal attacks. I would like to request a full protection to avoid an edit war until the consensus has been reached. C-GAUN (talk) 12:37, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
- Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:10, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ViperSnake151 Talk 16:20, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
Medium-length semi-protection From null protection to user editor protection. 202.70.74.198 (talk) 05:28, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined Unregistered and unconfirmed editors are already not permitted to modify other editors' primary user pages (the equivalent of semi-protection). This is enforced by using a filter. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 08:27, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
Havana (Camila Cabello song)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced content from various IP addresses. Ss112 09:23, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Longer than usual as this is the fourth time the article has needed to be semiprotected in the last month, and everyone deserves a break I think. fish&karate 11:35, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism User 261115 (talk) 09:25, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Progressing from previous 1 month semiprotection which saw a smorgasbord of vandal edits as soon as it expired. Next time will likely be indefinite. fish&karate 11:35, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Home Lander (talk) 00:49, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – person just died, attracting alot of vandalism. TheMesquitobuzz 06:34, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 06:56, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mz7 (talk) 07:13, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – adding new hoax employer by different ip. Matthew_hk tc 07:00, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 08:19, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
Guan Xiaotong
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalismand sock-puppetry.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.137.32.230 (talk) 08:06, 16 November 2017
- Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 08:13, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jay Coop · Talk · Contributions 04:39, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
- Six reverts in four days, not all related; potential to become a slow edit war at best, but may also go stale at this point. Samsara 08:34, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined Not yet. I do see some disruption, but I don't think that it's at a high enough rate to justify protecting the article. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:50, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Jetstreamer Talk 12:45, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: @Jetstreamer: Doesn't seem that either version is sourced. Samsara 13:51, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
- @Samsara: You're right, but any change should be.--Jetstreamer Talk 19:14, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
- Ideally, if someone challenges your version, you should provide a source. Samsara 20:46, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
- @Samsara: You're right, but any change should be.--Jetstreamer Talk 19:14, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: Source has been added, but vandalism has not recurred. Samsara 04:58, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 04:59, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism picked back up again after previous three-week protection expired. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk • contribs) 01:59, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 04:42, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 04:42, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: IP keeps adding poorly sourced trivial.109.162.9.209 (talk) 03:39, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 05:04, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Current events/news leading to repeated vandalism. Nyankee2003 (talk) 01:34, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 01:40, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent and repeated "NUMBAH WAN" vandalism from some IP hopper or something. Blake Gripling (talk) 01:48, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 04:26, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 04:26, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
Medium-length semi-protection – This article - about a piece of land which is claimed by neither Egypt or Sudan - attracts editors who like to assign the territory for one bogus claimant or another, and for that reason it's been semi'd before. We're in the middle of another spate of that kind of editing, and being semi'd again for a while will (hopefully) quiet things down. Beyond My Ken (talk) 02:46, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:24, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 03:41, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – This page is currently has pending changes enabled due to persistent vandalism, but it's set to expire in a month. Given that the page, a BLP article on a minor, is still a fairly constant target for vandals (most recently today), I request that the protection be made indefinite; or if not indefinite, at least extended for another year or two. TJRC (talk) 23:43, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:39, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 01:35, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite full protection: Admin only list page, surprised it is only semi-protected given that editing it changes the lists of functionaries on official policies. . Dysklyver 23:46, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Florida is in the midst of a high-profile search for a new football coach and there's been a lot of anonymous silly vandalism and attempted rumor spreading on this article. Semi-protection for the next few weeks would be helpful. Zeng8r (talk) 00:04, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 01:37, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – With the recent news about CAH buying land for where "the [US/Mexico] wall" is supposed to go, this article is going to be a target for ongoing vandalism until the current news-cycle dies down. Shearonink (talk) 23:06, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 23:40, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Simplexity22 (talk) 23:12, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 23:50, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism has been going on for a long time. Hummerrocket (talk) 00:18, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
- Pending-changes protected indefinitely. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 00:23, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:List of hoaxes on Wikipedia/Bine (mythology) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Indefinite full protection: Per standard practice for archives in the WP:HOAXLIST. – Train2104 (t • c) 18:32, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:23, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
- Fully protected indefinitely. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 23:32, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive editing continues since October's protection. Several brand new accounts and a few IPs adding promotional and at times silly edits or just plain vandalism. Doug Weller talk 20:30, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:53, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Dlohcierekim. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 23:35, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Ongoing disruption for over three years. SPA and IP accounts repeatedly adding the term "Brady Typing", which is a term invented in the podcast "Hello Internet" in 2014 due to the slow typing of one of the hosts, Brady Haran. Ever since, fans of the podcast have been edit warring to add the term into the article. See https://www.reddit.com/r/CGPGrey/comments/28zhut/hi_15_books_made_of_paper/ . The only sources anywhere are fan-created entries in Urban Dictionary and similar user-created content. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 22:50, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 23:37, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Controversy over Halladay comments hasn't calmed down yet, I suggedt we give it another 2 weeks under semi-protection. AnAwesomeArticleEditor (talk) 23:05, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 23:38, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Same vandalism resumed as soon as previous protection expired. David Biddulph (talk) 23:23, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 23:36, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk • contribs) 15:24, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:56, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent BLP violations by way of edit-warring over the date of birth of said-page's focus. Continued addition of unsourced and poorly sourced content, as well. livelikemusic talk! 16:37, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:58, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. —MBL Talk 16:38, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 23:00, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – . Fylindfotberserk (talk) 12:32, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:06, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent unexplained removal of content. Jetstreamer Talk 12:41, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:50, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP users repeatedly changing sourced information. Coderzombie (talk) 18:52, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.-- Dlohcierekim (talk) 20:09, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
Automated comment: @Dlohcierekim: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:23, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
- Fully protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 20:24, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
17 November 2017
- Goldman Environmental Prize (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- List of Ig Nobel Prize winners (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism again (by same range 197.39.*.*) DVdm (talk) 15:37, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked. Entire IP range 197.39.*.* blocked for 72 hours. ~Anachronist (talk) 00:54, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- @Anachronist: range blocking does not help. They just continue with another address in range 197.38.*.* — see Special:Contributions/197.38.216.99 - DVdm (talk) 09:55, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- Done. It's the same internet provider. I blocked 197.38.*.* too. Fish and karate (talk · contribs) already protected one article for 6 months, and I protected the other. ~Anachronist (talk) 15:28, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- @Anachronist: range blocking does not help. They just continue with another address in range 197.38.*.* — see Special:Contributions/197.38.216.99 - DVdm (talk) 09:55, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. LinguistunEinsuno 09:20, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Extended rather than semi, as the vandal(s) is/are using throwaway accounts, rather than anonymous IPs. fish&karate 10:13, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent disruptive editing from IPs, and no need for any changes to an archived AFD. Home Lander (talk) 19:25, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected indefinitely. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 19:30, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Multiple IP addresses continue to re-insert original research about the origins of the country's name. This could also be full-protected as a content dispute, I suppose. ~Anachronist (talk) 00:34, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:51, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. AndyAndyAndyAlbert (talk) 04:46, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined IP blocked and has not been edited for 11 hours. Anarchyte (work | talk) 14:20, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Due to sexual misconduct allegations. Home Lander (talk) 18:54, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 18:57, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Admitted company representative edit warring without providing reliable sources as requested. Also creating PA usernames, and uncivil behavior. BilCat (talk) 04:20, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:30, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator NinjaRobotPirate. Anarchyte (work | talk) 14:19, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by IPs in 2600.1001.* range. 135.23.202.24 (talk) 04:28, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:30, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Malcolmxl5. Anarchyte (work | talk) 14:19, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Brojam (talk) 08:24, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., give everyone a break and see if the vandalism dies down, and we can always switch to indefinite after that if it doesn't work. fish&karate 15:11, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: an IP editor keeps adding content that violates WP:CRYSTAL. Two weeks semi-protection should do it as the sources they rely on state that if an announcement is to be made, it will be made before the end of November. Prisonermonkeys (talk) 10:05, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. fish&karate 15:08, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
Protection: High level of edit-warring, including tag-teaming. --Pete (talk) 02:10, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Jenks24 . AustralianRupert (talk) 13:55, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Acts of vandalism from different IPs. Ss112 02:38, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (work | talk) 14:18, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Extended protection please. IPs continuously change the Cast names at their whim and fancruft. —IB [ Poke ] 04:54, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. - 3 edits in the past 2 weeks is not persistent vandalism. fish&karate 10:01, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Persistent edit warring. Jim1138 (talk) 09:19, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator AustralianRupert. Anarchyte (work | talk) 14:17, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High proportion of IP edits are vandalism. Minima© (talk) 09:30, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. - article has had two instances of vandalism in the past 2 weeks. fish&karate 10:04, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
Template protection: High-risk template. -- AlexTW 13:16, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected indefinitely. Anarchyte (work | talk) 14:16, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Doesn't quite seem like PC is working. Would benefit from semi-protection. Hummerrocket (talk) 02:01, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined - nowhere near enough disruptive editing to justify protection. I do note the liberal use of rollback to undo IP editors' well-meaning edits, with no explanation as to why on either the edit summary or on their talk page, though. fish&karate 09:44, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. -- AlexTW 02:33, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined - no, we don't protect a page just because you're quibbling over the format of an episode title. fish&karate 09:46, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Persistent removal of content by rapidly changing IP account. Jim1138 (talk) 11:00, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. It may just be the horrible grammar they objected to, which I've tried to fix at the same time. fish&karate 13:31, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Since Tesla's announcement of their prototype, people have been trying to sneak it into that list, even though it only enters production in 2020. 2601:1C0:8802:2F0:D85D:DC72:72E1:5CA3 (talk) 12:47, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. fish&karate 13:25, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Dynamic IPs keep changing the flag. Dr. K. 03:40, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., due to the edit warring but see message on talk page as there's a lot of misuse of rollback tools going on here. Rollback is to be used for vandalism, not a content dispute, which is what this is. fish&karate 09:56, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- @Fish and karate: Please do not assume the worst. I could not care less about this topic area to edit-war or use rollback without being convinced it was vandalism. I thought that the IP was anachronistically changing flags in this and other articles from the correct time of the Empire to the modern state, so I rolled it back to what I thought was the correct era. I have no canine in this fight. In good faith, I thought I was reverting vandalism of the flag image, given the time that the Russian empire ended. Please see my detailed response at the article talk. In any case, I am unwatching this article and disengaging from this topic area, as this subject appears trickier than most I have so far encountered. Dr. K. 11:07, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Almost every content addition, and every single one by an IP, over the last three month has been the prominent unsourced insertion of various colloquial nicknames (most often "bin chicken"). A few weeks' semi might be useful. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 09:24, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., as the previous 6 months' semiprotection has only recently expired and doesn't seem to have stopped things. Although bin chicken is a great name. fish&karate 10:07, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent similar disruption by IPs. — Ammarpad (talk) 09:55, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. fish&karate 10:03, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
Extended confirmed: BLP policy violations. Snuggums (talk / edits) 18:26, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 21:28, 16 November 2017 (UTC)- Dlohcierekim I asked for EC, not full protection, but please remember that if this isn't going to have indefinite EC then semi-protection should be restored as soon as full protection expires. Snuggums (talk / edits) 21:41, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
- SNUGGUMS Looked to me like a content dispute. Will relook. We don't like extended confirmed. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 21:43, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
- It wasn't a content dispute; people were added unsupported/poorly supported personal content into a BLP article. Snuggums (talk / edits) 21:53, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
- SNUGGUMS Looked to me like a content dispute. Will relook. We don't like extended confirmed. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 21:43, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
- Dlohcierekim I asked for EC, not full protection, but please remember that if this isn't going to have indefinite EC then semi-protection should be restored as soon as full protection expires. Snuggums (talk / edits) 21:41, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
- Not done I see some constructive edits that would be affected by extended confirmed. One sourced-to-TMZ love interest addition that you reverted. I don't see this as meriting ECP. Another admin should look and see, or recheck later. For now, I've restored semi protection indefinitely
- Semi-protected indefinitely. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 22:01, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
- If you look back to other edits from the past couple of weeks, then you'll see it isn't just one instance I and others had to revert. Snuggums (talk / edits) 22:17, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
- Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 23:45, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Multiple IPs over the past week are being used by the same vandal user continue re-inserting erroneous information into the article. Nonsense edit summaries suggest the user is not here to be constructive.--Mr Fink (talk) 00:44, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:45, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected. fish&karate 10:02, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: IP vandalism. Meme related edit war RealMelker (talk) 04:15, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. fish&karate 09:57, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: IP hopper has been persistently attempting to add unsourced and unverifiable content to the page for the past two months. snapsnap (talk) 04:26, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. fish&karate 09:59, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Same as above. 331dot (talk) 18:00, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:43, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Samsara.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:02, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: on-going revert war. Someone (User:Cazzi36 in the past months and now an anonymous user) is always changing the name of the CEO. 1 month block to the IP (one week ago) was useless. --Frieda (talk) 22:01, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:13, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:07, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. WNYY98 (talk) 22:17, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:10, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP hopper re-adding "offline mode" without sources. No known sources exist. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk • contribs) 22:58, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:12, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Consistent vandalism on the article, which is building up a protection log. Favre1fan93 (talk) 00:11, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:30, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Samsara.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:13, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated. AndyAndyAndyAlbert (talk) 05:06, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – 3 IPs vandalising page. Cocohead781 (talk) 22:36, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 04:40, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 04:40, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Goes back a long time. Hummerrocket (talk) 23:01, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:29, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- User Comment: Can confirm Cyberbot's comment. Page is temporarily semi-protected. Cocohead781 (talk) 00:51, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 03:17, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. —Frosty ☃ 23:05, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:29, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 03:18, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Disruptive editing IPs persistently add a Korean boy band to the table which is agreed to be excluded by most editors based on the talk page's consensus due to inflated published figure.--Harout72 (talk) 23:06, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected indefinitely. Samsara 04:41, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandal - may be the same one that's been blocked and creating havoc. Atsme📞📧 01:47, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:59, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator The Bushranger. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 03:13, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – See article history. Article has been vandalized several times in the past few days. –Miles Edgeworth Talk 02:56, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 03:14, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
Request removal of SP. Article was protected on the strength of just one instance of vandalism, and only two instances in the entire edit history. Looks like a case of preemptive protection for a high profile article. Mentioned to the protecting admin, but he would prefer to keep it protected -User talk:Ymblanter#Protection of 2017 Zimbabwean coup d'état. Thanks. 141.6.11.24 (talk) 13:04, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
- Not unprotected - it's only for 3 days, there was more than one instance, and if it's that urgent, then as Ymblanter politely asked of you, please request your edit at the article talk page. fish&karate 15:27, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
- No thanks. Didn't want to edit it anyway. I just get annoyed by admins who don't adhere to policy; preemptive protecting just to exclude IPs, for instance. You are right though, there was more than one instance, there were two, well-spaced instances. 141.6.11.24 (talk) 15:56, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – WP:INVOLVED request. This page has been under attack by a now-banned editor using IPs and open proxies for most of the last two years, repeatedly adding the same unsourced negative assertions about living persons involved in the company. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 14:21, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
- I'm not accepting or declining it, but please explain to me what the BLP violation here is, as all I can see is a content dispute over who founded these races. fish&karate 15:21, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
- The BLP violations are edits such as this which are poorly or entirely unsourced. More examples: [62] [63] [64] [65] (edit summaries are also informative). The IPs also frequently add links as references which lead to attack blogs, for example [66] [67]. There's also a fair bit of this on the talk page. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 15:28, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
- I don't see those as BLP issues, this is a content dispute over who founded the races, the edits are not biographical in nature; I'm personally reluctant to use page protection to stifle a contentious content dispute to the advantage of the editors with accounts, but will let someone else make the decision in case I'm wrong here. fish&karate 15:35, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
- I wrote a long thing here in response, but instead I'll just ask you to type in the URL lastrace316[dot]com in your browser, which the IP user has repeatedly tried to insert as a source (e.g. [68] [69]), and then perhaps again with joedesena[dot]org ([70] [71]), and compare the use of such sources in a Wikipedia article to the guidance at WP:BLPSELFPUB and WP:BLPEL.
- You're correct that there's a running content discussion regarding the origin of these events, among editors with accounts who are capable of debating and analyzing sources within the norms of Wikipedia policy. The IP user, on the other hand, repeatedly disrupts these discussions with their conspiracy claims and links to self-authored attack blogs, which only ceases when the page is protected. I respect your decision to leave this for another admin to review (as I'm doing by posting here in the first place), and in case it will be informative here are some relevant discussions from the talk page and from ANI. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:23, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
- I don't see those as BLP issues, this is a content dispute over who founded the races, the edits are not biographical in nature; I'm personally reluctant to use page protection to stifle a contentious content dispute to the advantage of the editors with accounts, but will let someone else make the decision in case I'm wrong here. fish&karate 15:35, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
- The BLP violations are edits such as this which are poorly or entirely unsourced. More examples: [62] [63] [64] [65] (edit summaries are also informative). The IPs also frequently add links as references which lead to attack blogs, for example [66] [67]. There's also a fair bit of this on the talk page. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 15:28, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. Let's see if this encourages discussion. If not, indef semi is possible, but prefer not to resort to that just yet. ~Anachronist (talk) 00:42, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Because the publisher has been criticized by Jeffrey Beall as being a predatory open access publisher, this page attracts a bunch of SPA and IPs that want to vilify Beall and sanitize the articles of criticism. There's an ongoing dispute now that can't be characterized as 'whitewashing', but there's still socking/meatpuppetting going on.Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 16:16, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Seems a bit to soon for indef, can always escalate later. ~Anachronist (talk) 01:00, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – IP's/newly created accounts constantly target this article, in order to add personal commentary and self-formulated content into it. This has been going on for quite some time now. - LouisAragon (talk) 21:12, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected indefinitely. Let's try that first before escalating to extended confirmed, which should be a last resort. ~Anachronist (talk) 00:49, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
18 November 2017
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Strange rash of multiple new user accounts vandalizing article. Ifnord (talk) 04:41, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
- Group of new accounts blocked. Let's see if that takes care of the problem. Acroterion (talk) 04:52, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
- You did that really fast. Impressive. Ifnord (talk) 04:54, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked. Alexf(talk) 13:38, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
- @Acroterion: and @Alexf: I notice that new accounts are still being generated and the vandalism continues. Ifnord (talk) 14:15, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP and users vandalism.
- Declined, I only see recent vandalism from one IP, which has been reverted. The IP has never been warned.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:57, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Newly elected political party leader facing persistent politicised edits (changing nationality, name of party, etc.) KristoferKeane (talk) 13:28, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:27, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary Pending Changes-protection:Persistent vandalism by IP users ; always changing the host nation and participating nations. Bingobro (Chat) 15:36, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alexf(talk) 18:24, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – IP's are adding that he has died, when in fact it's his brother Malcolm Young who has died, Temporary semi, maybe till midnight till things level off. - FlightTime (open channel) 16:29, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Oshwah. Alexf(talk) 18:23, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Multiple IP addresses (probably all the same person) have been re-adding the same tendentious and unsourced text multiple times over the past month. I have removed the vandalism for now, but it is bound to be repeated223.188.36.38 (talk) 16:39, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alexf(talk) 18:22, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – edit warring between 2 or 3 users (and the creator of the article was banned for socks). Matthew_hk tc 08:30, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
- Fully protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (work | talk) 14:34, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism with unsourced edits about the artist's death. EmpyreusX 13:36, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 13:56, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Spike Wilbury. Alexf(talk) 15:16, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Since winning Miss World 2017, the article has been subject to a lot of IP disruptive editing or vandalism, that I have to constantly keep reverting. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 14:56, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alexf(talk) 15:18, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – per Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Editorofthepage1. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:47, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:50, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:35, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Primefac. Alexf(talk) 13:37, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism to the article. Most recently, the article has been defaced with "Terrorist terrorist" repeated. . K.e.coffman (talk) 05:05, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked., I do not see any reason to protect the article at this point.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:53, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: IP socks of Euexperttime (talk · contribs) are now trying to blank the latest report. MarnetteD|Talk 05:38, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:51, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 06:12, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined, this is one IP, they have been sufficiently warned and need to be blocked if they continue.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:49, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Anonymous IP has continually deleted links based on his/her subjective view of whether the linked movie was a financial success or received critical acclaim. The page is a list of non-Japanese films set in Japan, with no qualifiers as to quality or box office gross. 154.51.3.204 (talk) 12:01, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:50, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @Ymblanter: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 13:11, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Edit warring Jim1138 (talk) 10:29, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:55, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant insertion of WP:CRYSTAL information about an event that’s 5 years away. . Ytoyoda (talk) 12:02, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:52, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Dynamic IP is removing sourced information. McSly (talk) 12:22, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:53, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – There is an ongoing tendency for editors to alter the information in this table without providing a source. For example, in just the last 24 hours alone we have had two different figures installed for Stephen Lee (see [72] and [73]). He has not played since 2014 so his tally cannot have changed. While I don't want to prevent editors from updating the table the updates would benefit from review to ensure that new sources are provided for the figures. At the moment it seems to be a lottery which figure gets added. This has been a recurring problem over the last few years and I think PC would greatly enhance the quality control for the article. It had it once before and it worked well then. Betty Logan (talk) 19:49, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
Pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Hummerrocket (talk) 20:56, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alexf(talk) 11:48, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Kanyewest42 (talk · contribs) was indefinitely blocked for disruptive editing several days ago and now we've got an IP hopping block evader. . Dawnseeker2000 22:43, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alexf(talk) 11:50, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Edits + reversion by 65.51.206.186 in violation of [[WP::BLP]]. Jtwang (talk) 23:09, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alexf(talk) 11:50, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Sudden high level of IP/not-autoconfirmed user vandalism. Impru20 (talk) 23:38, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alexf(talk) 11:53, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. JDDJS (talk) 23:49, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alexf(talk) 11:52, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism and insertion of unsuitable material. The article is on a white supremacist which attract POV-challenged editors, hence I'm requesting indefinite pending changes protection. This would allow anyone to edit, but would prevent Cantwell's fan base from inserting preferred material. Sample edit [74], with edit summary about "jewish people stopping at nothing" (you get the idea). K.e.coffman (talk) 02:03, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alexf(talk) 11:56, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Vandalism and Hoaxes edits by User:Bertrand101 IP Sock. LG-Gunther : Talk 02:21, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alexf(talk) 11:54, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of Husker fans want this and a Siri glitch is attracting vandalsm. Frost is the head coach of UCF and has not been hired by Nebraska. DHeyward (talk) 02:31, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:51, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: IP socks of Euexperttime (talk · contribs) are now pestering my talk page. MarnetteD|Talk 05:45, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked: 129.67.116.0/22 (talk · contribs).: the /22 should cover the known range involved. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 06:41, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – An anonymous user returned to put her date of birth of the Japanese voice actress Chie Nakamura knowing that she was born in the 1970s, which is false and keeps looking at her information through the Google search. See contributions here: 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5.
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:53, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Mass-pileon after bout Jim1138 (talk) 05:10, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:43, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism by an IP. Edward321 (talk) 04:37, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AustralianRupert (talk) 05:27, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: an IP sock of Euexperttime (talk · contribs) has returned to this article. SPI has been filed but article usually needs a few days protection as well. MarnetteD|Talk 04:46, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Acroterion (talk) 04:51, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing from IP users. User 261115 (talk) 05:55, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:50, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Frankly, this is a bit ridiculous. The article was protected for a few weeks last month due to the same series of IPs adding two inconsistent, stray eses to the lead. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 07:41, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:48, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – increased vandalism/BLP violation activity over the last days. Denniss (talk) 08:30, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:46, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Consistent altering of entires for specific artists (EXO, BTS) and 2016 and 2017 entries. Mαuri’96 “everything and nothing always haunts me…” 17:32, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined I don't really see that much socking. GABgab 21:08, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
Persistent vandalism. A111317 (talk) 20:01, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (work | talk) 01:13, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. Bazonka (talk) 21:11, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AustralianRupert (talk) 01:10, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism. Boomer VialHolla! We gonna ball! 00:37, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (work | talk) 01:11, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. One promotional account after another. 2601:188:180:11F0:AD9C:39F3:1470:72E2 (talk) 01:01, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 36 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (work | talk) 01:05, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
19 November 2017
Semi-protection: Article edited 5 time by the same iP without consensus, and the iP refuse to go in talk page. [75], [76], [77], [78], [79]. Panam2014 (talk) 16:29, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:57, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. JDDJS (talk) 19:35, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:51, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jiten talk contribs 21:38, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mz7 (talk) 21:44, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Lordtobi (✉) 09:53, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked: TimTimBoBimBim (talk · contribs) blocked by Widr. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 14:54, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection:Persistent disruptive editing - Users are removing references and vandalising the content.2405:205:108B:5584:35E2:E3AC:CCBB:8E7C (talk) 11:10, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 14:57, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: An IP tries to constantly change the name of the article, even without any consensus for it. See 1, 2, 3. I believe it is necessary to protect. Comuna de Paris (talk) 13:47, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment):You should wait the discussion be closed. Also, there are sources that confirm the name change.
- Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 15:02, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
- OK. It was used for three times. This is a third time that a IP tried to rename the article without consensus. What should I do? Comuna de Paris (talk) 15:10, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment): It was the first time with Livres name.
- Okay, I got tired. The administrator that was supposed to solve even looked at the discussion. He let the IP vandalize the article, without reliable sources to edit with false information. I'm disappointed. I'm not going to revert anyone. Comuna de Paris (talk) 15:26, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment): Stop complaining. It's a sourced information.[1]
- Okay, I got tired. The administrator that was supposed to solve even looked at the discussion. He let the IP vandalize the article, without reliable sources to edit with false information. I'm disappointed. I'm not going to revert anyone. Comuna de Paris (talk) 15:26, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment): It was the first time with Livres name.
- OK. It was used for three times. This is a third time that a IP tried to rename the article without consensus. What should I do? Comuna de Paris (talk) 15:10, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Stop lying. The font does not proof the renaming. Even the source says that not everyone officialized the name change. You have already been reverted by other users before. Comuna de Paris (talk) 15:45, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment): Yes, some parties not yet officialized, but others (like Livres) already officialized.
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:05, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined IP warned. Ad Orientem (talk) 14:24, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism - lots of unregistred users undoing edits. Jvalienforce (talk) 20:44, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 14:31, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Has twice now been overwritten with the version at Draft:Kelvin Roy, concerning a completely different person. Auric talk 01:56, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 14:35, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Controversial film, which has sparked protests across India, seems to be a major target among multiple IP vandals. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 15:35, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 14:10, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Favre1fan93 (talk) 17:19, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined Looks like the disruptive editor was blocked. I see one possible instance of socking since then. That's not enough for PP. Ad Orientem (talk) 14:14, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. JDDJS (talk) 05:30, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
- As far as I am concerned, pending changes are working just fine, constructive IP edits get accepted.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:52, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Samsara 07:55, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Repeated additions of Nigeria being qualified for the games. This is being done because the media has incorrectly reported the nation has qualified. In fact Nigeria has not qualified as of now. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 20:57, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
- To back this up please look here, in particular the end under "clarification" where the CBC amended the story. There is a vast amount of media repeating what some other outlet has already reported so it is complicated, but hopefully others will follow the CBC in recognizing the error.18abruce (talk) 21:13, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 14:50, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 14:52, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
- Oops... cross protected. -Ad Orientem (talk) 14:54, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism on main page and talk page by IP user from Chicago. High level of IP vandalism in general. Please make sure that final revision is pre IP vandalism prior to page protection Pdyusmep (talk) 21:23, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 14:52, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs making unsupported edits, declining to engage in discussion. DonIago (talk) 00:28, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 08:02, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Samsara. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 14:53, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Evasion of admin-only protection - see Sunil Shakya. Cahk (talk) 09:53, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
- Creation protected indefinitely. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 14:56, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing. Tommy1933 (talk) 11:28, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 14:59, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – As soon as the previous protection expired on the day of the event, the vandalism resume. Nickag989talk 13:26, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 15:00, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. -- AlexTW 14:04, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 15:03, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by a similar user with different IPs. Night Lantern (talk) 14:05, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 15:04, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Unsourced edits has now resulted in WP:CIRCULAR by some publishers. Let There Be Sunshine (talk) 16:03, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 14:12, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Repeated addition of POV material in Wikipedia's voice by an IP hopper. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 18:41, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
And, currently, repeated additions of unsourced material. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 02:18, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 08:02, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Samsara. Ad Orientem (talk) 14:25, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – A handful of IPs are suddenly disputing phrasing and content surrounding controversies in the late subject's career, leading to a lot of back and forth stuff, which an experienced editor is trying to stay on top of, but it could use some protection from the disruptive IPs. Echoedmyron (talk) 19:21, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 08:02, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Samsara. Ad Orientem (talk) 14:26, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I guess this guy broke up with his girlfriend and everybody has a strong opinion about it... in a way that violates BLP. GMGtalk 19:52, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 14:28, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Multiple annons have made disruptive edits for the past few days. Gary "Roach" Sanderson (talk) 01:06, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declining this on a balance between "not enough activity" and "likely collateral damage". Samsara 08:30, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined Samsara 08:30, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Angry listeners of the previous station: 100.3 The Sound, are inserting phrases like 'the horrible Christian station' and 'Real Christians are listening to 1280 AM...'. as well as other vandalism. DoulosBen (talk) 07:38, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- I am inclined to decline, I see indeed a couple of vandal edits in a span of several days, but most IP edits are constructive.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:00, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
- Concur. Samsara 07:53, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined Samsara 07:53, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – Target of ConsumersDistributingonline socks; no pun intended. Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 17:04, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked: Yellowfresh (talk · contribs) blocked by Ivanvector. Samsara 07:43, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
- @Johnny Au: Are there other socks? We don't use ECP if a situation can be handled with one or a few blocks. Samsara 07:43, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – ban evasion by Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Nangparbat. —MBL Talk 07:07, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
- Looks like a classic case of a dispute with no attempt at talk page resolution by either side. In fact, there is an unanswered merge suggestion sitting there from back in August. Samsara 07:41, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Samsara 07:41, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Snuggums (talk / edits) 01:37, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
- I concur with SNUGGUMS. Continuous IP disruption is going on adding false content and removing sourced information. —IB [ Poke ] 03:10, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 09:01, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – User involved in edit war had started to use talk and resolve the dispute in a civil manner, but the page still suffered from the vandal of new user. Matthew_hk tc 13:31, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 08:50, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – See article edit history, page has been vandalized several times, going back as far as September. The article currently has PC-protection, however this doesn't seem to deter people from vandalizing the article. Recommend long-term temporary semi-protection, as well as indefinite pending changes protection once the semi-protection expires. . –Miles Edgeworth Talk 22:35, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 08:02, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected indefinitely. Samsara 08:53, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Multiple IP addresses (probably all the same person) have been re-adding the same tendentious and unsourced text multiple times over the past month. See Talk for more detail. Some of the same SPA IPs have been involved more recently in the Herzegovina dispute. I doubt that two-day semi-protection will suffice for either of these. --Macrakis (talk) 19:54, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:30, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Anachronist. Samsara 08:37, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed: BLP policy violations. Binksternet (talk) 20:04, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- We always semi-protect first and then increase to ECP if additional blocks don't suffice. Samsara 08:39, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected indefinitely. Samsara 08:39, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of IP vandalism that needs changing . JMHamo (talk) 20:30, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:05, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Mattythewhite. Samsara 08:40, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Multiple IPs adding unsourced content. Likely same person who was previously blocked. Jim1138 (talk) 21:28, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:35, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Alexf. Samsara 08:41, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:Wiki Science Competition 2017 in the United States (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qzd (talk) 04:08, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 08:46, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Sockpuppet libel on an article with few edits. 213.205.195.4 (talk) 17:50, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 07:47, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. -- AlexTW 02:56, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked. /64 rangeblock applied. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 03:20, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Regular edits with non-reliable or no citations promote the Catalan cause, including raising the number of native speakers. This long term habit to promote a POV has increased since the recent independence attempts. Roger 8 Roger (talk) 04:29, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 07:37, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent addition of poorly sourced info. the user has used other IP addresses in the past. IPs seem to be based out of Iran. Adamgerber80 (talk) 14:42, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined, seems to have stopped, and this was just one IP anyway. Apologies for not reacting earlier.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:28, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Dr. K. 22:58, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:03, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary Semi-protection: Possible persistent disruptive editing & possible vandalism. Cassidy hasn't passed away yet but to be on the safe side of hearing multiple stories that will be coming out about him being deceased or still in critical condition due to organ failure. I think it's best to make his article semi-protected for a couple of weeks.
- Some IP edits were helpful. I have Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I will also watch the article and update to semi protection if necessary. 5 albert square (talk) 01:33, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
20 November 2017
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Request the same protection as Bosnia (region) (i.e. semi until 19 February 2018, to keep them in sync) since both articles are being repeatedly hit by the same IP-hopping sockmaster (see page history of Herzegovina and Bosnia (region)). - Tom | Thomas.W talk 12:58, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 20:16, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: IP and SPA vandalism. Lizard (talk) 15:12, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:43, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Primefac. Samsara 20:24, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Many false claims that he is dead. Hummerrocket (talk) 15:43, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:57, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Samsara. Favonian (talk) 20:27, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Slow and persistent creative and non-creative vandalism, mainly by IPs. Firebrace (talk) 16:31, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:57, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Samsara. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:58, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Several attempts over past 72 hours to remove Nikola Tesla's national background details from anonymous editors. Bold reverts coupled with dogmatic summaries "we don't need" which is a matter of personal opinion. I am not the only editor to have restored these details and the article had been stable with some form of nationality for a very long time before recent disruptions. I continue to welcome discussion. Coldtrack (talk) 19:41, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 20:13, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from IP address, possibly rivalry. Coderzombie (talk) 10:43, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:29, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: There is a high level of IP vandalism on this page as I have checked the edit history, nearly all IP edits appear to be vandalism (maybe one or two IP edits in the last year are not vandalism out of over 30). Lavalizard101 (talk) 12:51, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:57, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Samsara.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:32, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit warring from multiple autoconfirmed users. PCHS-NJROTC (Messages)Have a blessed day. 19:27, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
- Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:31, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Move protection: Page title dispute/move warring. Editor abcdef (talk) 06:50, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
- Move protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:14, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Lordtobi (✉) 07:08, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:57, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Samsara.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:15, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – repeated addition of copyrighted material and claims of a non-notable "revival" of the party added by multiple accounts and IPs. Jon Kolbert (talk) 08:14, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
- Question: Has an SPI been opened? Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:14, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
- No, but since the edits seem to be coming from one account and several IPs checkusers wouldn't be able to comment anyway. Jon Kolbert (talk) 16:59, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:20, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruptive editing. Boomer VialHolla! We gonna ball! 10:02, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
- False claim. If there is vandalism it's on the party of this editor and his cronies who seem desperate to break the sorting of the table. Hard to guess why they want to do that as they haven't attempted to explain it ever. 82.132.230.60 (talk) 10:08, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 19:17, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – This page has been created 3 times since August 2017 and speedily deleted each time. -KAP03(Talk • Contributions • Email) 18:25, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
- Creation protected indefinitely. RickinBaltimore (talk) 19:12, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism picked up again after previous protection expired. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk • contribs) 18:45, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. RickinBaltimore (talk) 19:09, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – 8 different IPs in the last week. –72 (talk) 19:06, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:09, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Target of IP-hopping trolling. Please protect the page even if you block the user(S) responsible - they'll likely find more IPs to use.. Crboyer (talk) 07:58, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:12, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent trolling. Crboyer (talk) 07:59, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 08:24, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator zzuuzz. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:13, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Entranced98 (talk) 12:03, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:17, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. KGirl (Wanna chat?) 13:19, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 13:40, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:44, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:188:180:11F0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 13:29, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator HJ Mitchell. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:49, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Some sort of tag-team vandalism going on here. My name isnotdave (talk/contribs) 13:40, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., users are blocked and edits have been revdel’ed. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:56, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from anons on a BLP regarding stories of a sexual assault and professional resignations. I have added a NPOV/BLP-friendly sentence and source on latest news and recommend it be semi-protected for a couple of weeks. -Reagle (talk) 13:53, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:58, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:43, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:07, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Favre1fan93 (talk) 17:46, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. I do not think spaces in the wiki-markup is something worthwhile to edit-war for, however, the IP is hopping and does not seem to want to discuss anything.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:17, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Repeated joke edits, removal of proof of verification, treating the main page like public noticeboard, personal attacks, and just pure vandalism. This is a well-known subject, and clearly vandals want readers to see their work. However, there are far too many IP editors reverting vandalism and making constructive contributions for semi-protection, so pending changes will help us throw out the bathwater without throwing out the baby. — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 20:41, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:20, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
- User:Prisonermonkeys (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- User talk:Prisonermonkeys (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: I have been subject to harrassment by User:GeoJoe1000 for some time. I recently had temporary semi-protection put in place on my talk page, but as soon as it was lifted, he posted another message on it (I am going to report it at ANI) I would like the semi-protection reinstated, preferably for as long as possible, please. Prisonermonkeys (talk)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 06:38, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected. The user talk page has been protected for one month by administrator Cullen328. Your main user page, in fact everybody’s main user page, is protected by an edit filter (the equivalent of semi-protection). Malcolmxl5 (talk) 06:58, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @Malcolmxl5: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 07:09, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
- Requesting immediate archiving... Not helpful, Cyberbot!Malcolmxl5 (talk) 08:49, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:42, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 14 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 04:38, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 04:39, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing. Reversion of redirect without establishing notability, continuing with presumable block evasion by Mr. Laury. 2601:188:180:11F0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 02:26, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator TonyBallioni. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 06:34, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Not even 1 hour after the protection template was removed, an unconstructive edit occurred. The NFL is in season and Wilson is a high profile player so vandalism will be persistent without page protection. aqwfyj Talk/Contribs 03:43, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:08, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Samsara. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 06:30, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP editor who has vandalized my talkpage in the past is back. I want my main talkpage protected from editing by unconfirmed editors. Shearonink (talk) 03:48, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 06:33, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The "ownership" vandalism has gotten out of hand in the last couple of hours; rarely do more than a few days go by without the Cowboys being "owned" by someone on WP. Too bad we can't just protect one infobox parameter. EricEnfermero (Talk) 04:58, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 06:37, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The vandalism started once the page was nominated at AfD. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk • contribs) 01:14, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:47, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
- @Graeme Bartlett: I see indef protection applied? jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk • contribs) 02:50, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
- Something went wrong there, I only want to protect till AFD is over. Protected a week. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:31, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
- @Graeme Bartlett: I see indef protection applied? jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk • contribs) 02:50, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – BLP violations by multiple IPs. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 02:53, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 03:21, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Justgravy has created a few socks and is persistent on reverting, Obviously they're not gonna stop so figured after SPI this was the next best place, Thanks. –Davey2010Talk 03:41, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:34, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Favre1fan93 (talk) 17:55, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:05, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:39, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive editing from several IP hoppers changing the character's name to "Veronica." Katniss May the odds be ever in your favor ♥ 17:59, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:38, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Repeated vandalism today from 3 IP addresses. Semi-protection for a short period of time would help. Thank you. Knope7 (talk) 01:14, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:35, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Possible forthcoming edit war. This page should be protected because of users like the AHMED XIV (as the name says, obviously someone of the Middle East who feel something against other Middle East country) who do not like obvious and verified facts and even despite the confirmation of the added content, people like this will continue in removing the content of the page without any meaningful reason and likely just because of some personal indignation they feel against a certain country, in this case the Algeria. Furthermore, unregistered users keep also removing sourced content of the page and adding unsourced one. BlackFlanker (talk) 01:56, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:45, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: IP-hopper has been disruptively trolling the article for over a week. Softlavender (talk) 02:02, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:42, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism by IPs and new accounts. RolandR (talk) 21:52, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alexf(talk) 23:41, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:188:180:11F0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 21:59, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:36, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Malcolmxl5. Alexf(talk) 23:40, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism, block evasion. 2601:188:180:11F0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 22:04, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. User blocked but in view of the block evasion going on, semi-protected for one week also. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:11, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Permanent template-editor protection: Widely transcluded, and easily broken, but not broadly watchlisted. Someone actually broke it in January and no one fixed it until just now (the breakage was not apparent on all pages that use it, just with particular parameters). This template shouldn't be edited by anyone who doesn't know how and why to do sandboxing and test cases. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ >ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ< 22:35, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – high level of IP vandalism recently. -★- PlyrStar93. →Message me. ← 22:56, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
- Please protect this page - three editors and ClueBot are fighting against an apparently endless stream of IP vandals. RolandR (talk) 23:13, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alexf(talk) 23:39, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
21 November 2017
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent addition of copyrighted WP:BOOSTER material by IP editor(s). James (talk/contribs) 18:21, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:25, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism from immature Jacksonville Jaguars fans. Made me loose my cool for a moment. But still a persistent problem. Needs a semi so they get bored and go away. oknazevad (talk) 20:11, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 20:21, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Over the last week, four IPs have vandalized the page by adding unuseful comments. Hakken (talk) 20:18, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 12 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 20:25, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. NewEnglandYankee (talk) 20:19, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Wuff! let me no if that's not enough. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 20:27, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
Move protection: Has been moved three times recent months (and I had to move it back), always without discussion. It would probably be better if the page is move protected, and controversial moves would be discussed at the talk page. Ymblanter (talk) 20:24, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Move protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 20:32, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring –
Same issue as here. - FlightTime (open channel) 20:26, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 20:28, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Several acts of vandalism, IPs switching countries, etc. –DJB3.14 talk 19:38, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 19:51, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 19:51, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – User or users unknown have been persistently vandalizing the page, with a renewed vigor in recent days. Et0048 (talk) 19:45, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 19:57, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: This is a structured reality show, and the source for the show's outcome would be the show itself. Various IPs have been constantly adding unsourced information that contradicts the show as aired, and none have been willing to discuss on the Talk page or even make statements in edit summaries. --DavidK93 (talk) 20:10, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 20:19, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – Current editor, user:93.149.45.180, same city, same ISP, is evading block. Request locking to all but 93.44.80.218 and blanking except ISP and block templates. Walter Görlitz (talk) 18:29, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of nearly three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 18:49, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism over the past few weeks. . Yasmeh (talk) 18:52, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 19:47, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cahk (talk) 19:22, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 19:49, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – User talk pages has been vandalism and attack page edits by User:Taiki0409 IP sock. LG-Gunther : Talk 12:37, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined Revoked talk page access instead, as that seemed the more direct solution. Vanamonde (talk) 13:44, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Continued addition of non-notable people to page by anonymous users. Paris1127 (talk) 17:22, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 17:26, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: IP vandalism.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 18:02, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 18:07, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Several users keep on adding a Steam page profile to the infobox. I have no idea why but this has been going on for months and even after blocks, keeps happening. Given that this business has raised several questions/controversies in the past, I think that Indef-semi should be requested. MASEM (t) 18:12, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
- Pending-changes protected indefinitely. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 18:19, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. -- AlexTW 15:59, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 16:53, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from multiple annons. User:Felicia777 (talk) 16:39, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 16:56, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced release dates, vandalism has also occurred. WikiVirusC(talk) 16:41, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 16:58, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
Unprotection: Because this is an editnotice, it would be automatically template-protected by the title blacklist if protection was removed. The protecting admin is not an admin anymore. —MRD2014 Talk • Edits • Help! 00:27, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected (reduced protection) Alexf(talk) 15:57, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. RRD (talk) 14:24, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected – 3 months. EdJohnston (talk) 14:49, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constantly retargeted to nonsense. PRehse (talk) 14:45, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected – Indef. This is just the redirect to the article, which resides at Georgia Bulldogs football. EdJohnston (talk) 14:52, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs since yesterday have been sneakily vandalising the article, No idea why but I think semi might be best for a while, Thanks. –Davey2010Talk 14:57, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 14:59, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement. Shrike (talk) 09:49, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
- Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:30, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. LG-Gunther : Talk 02:40, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:13, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by same range 197.39.*.* and 197.38.*.* as articles Goldman Environmental Prize (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) and List of Ig Nobel Prize winners (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) DVdm (talk) 13:25, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 13:33, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 13:47, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of unsourced, controversial material by a succession of IPs. Mutt Lunker (talk) 14:06, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 14:13, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection}} persistent BLP vandalism Jim1138 (talk) 08:32, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:53, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary Semi-protection: Some vandalism since article is in the news now. Sherenk1 (talk) 10:48, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:58, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. -- AlexTW 12:06, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:33, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 12:35, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: IPs repeatedly adding copyrighted materials to this page.PohranicniStraze (talk) 06:13, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:39, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Repeatedly created - see Joinlinks. Cahk (talk) 08:27, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Creation protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:45, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – See Joinlinks Advertising India. Cahk (talk) 08:27, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
Automated comment: @CambridgeBayWeather: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 10:33, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Creation protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:45, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Please make this page to semi protection because it will be no longer disrupted by any editor anymore. Jack Shukla AKA TKSS & Paplesh. (talk) 17:29, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. Jack Shukla that request was in the wrong section.
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Repeatedly vandalises the data and information. Incorrect information putted without any sources. This page is about Malaysia Super League for 2018 season. Shafiqabu (talk) 02:25, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:11, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: IPs repeatedly adding copyrighted materials to this page.PohranicniStraze (talk) 06:06, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 10:33, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:20, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Popular page for IPs and new users to add a sentence or two of vandalism. Nothing too serious, but pending changes would stop most of the vandals. . - Mnnlaxer | talk | stalk 21:46, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:37, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.
A politician very heavily covered in Indonesian news at the time being. Requesting a relatively long-term protection due to possibility of even more events happening. Juxlos (talk) 22:11, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:38, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: massive IP vandalism after missed field goal. Lizard (talk) 05:04, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:32, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- (Non-Admin comment): Already protected Cocohead781 (talk) 06:39, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Requesting immediate archiving... for the bot. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:15, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent reference removal . Andrewgprout (talk) 05:15, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
- Both edit warriors seem to be autoconfirmed, and semi-protection would not help. Full protection could be an option, but it is probably too late.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:12, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined seems to have died down. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:21, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Continued sockpuppetry after expiration of protection. My name isnotdave (talk/contribs) 09:25, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
- Question: Has an SPI been opened? Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:08, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
- I actually agree that the material they try to remove is a BLP violation. It is not sourced to a reliable source.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:27, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined stale. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:22, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – On-going pattern of vandalism from IP's and anonymous editors, dating back to the page's first protection in June 2014. Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content to article. livelikemusic talk! 14:03, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:32, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued disruptive editing by IP's and anonymous editors by way of addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content to article. livelikemusic talk! 14:05, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:32, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content to article. livelikemusic talk! 14:08, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:32, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content to article. livelikemusic talk! 14:10, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:32, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP editors have persistently been changing content related to the subject's self-identification without adjusting the sources. A widely available documentary was released about the subject in October and could be contributing to this attention. This page was EC protected between July and August. – Rhinopias (talk) 00:59, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 04:21, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Excessive vandalism of the featured article. Home Lander (talk) 02:05, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 04:46, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Samsara. TonyBallioni (talk) 05:47, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
Permanent semi-protection: There has been vandalism on this page every single week for months on end. The subject of the article is a conspiracy theorist and troll, and his followers frequently come to the page to revert remove reliably sourced content and add unsourced content of their own. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 15:38, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 14 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 04:06, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Too much Vandalism due to Recent News. IM3847 (talk) 16:28, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:42, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 18 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 04:14, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 04:14, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: IP vandalism, also may need some revdel for recent edits. Lizard (talk) 01:21, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:51, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
Protection: Often vandalized, despite being infrequently edited. Not one good IP edit has been made after protection ended in July. George Ho (talk) 01:32, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected indefinitely. Samsara 04:02, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Consensus in history and talk page that this is redundant to Secondary suite. New users have repeatedly recreated the fork. This is difficult to detect. This page should not be allowed to be created without consensus to spin out at Talk:Secondary suite, and certainly not by a non auto-confirmed account that currently can't create new pages. SmokeyJoe (talk) 02:21, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected indefinitely. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:54, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism since the debut of the film, mostly done by IPs. Hakken (talk) 21:27, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:36, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Possible temporary protection for a month or too until the IP editor gets bored. They are repeatedly removing reliable citations and content. – JocularJellyfish TalkContribs 00:57, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:39, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism following subject's death on 11/20. GCG (talk) 01:08, 21 November 2017 (UTC) GCG (talk) 01:08, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:41, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Adam9007 (talk) 18:29, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – This is one user who is inserting clearly disruptive content. The user has been warned, and if they make the same edits again, then they may be blocked to prevent further disruption. Mz7 (talk) 22:29, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recently semi protected & disruption resumed as soon as it expired. Someone continually adding controversial info w/o a RS. . Fyddlestix (talk) 21:17, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:59, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
- Already done by administrator Doug Weller. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:20, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
* Israelites (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Indefinite Semi-Protection: The topic Israelites has nothing to do with the Arab–Israeli conflict as the Israelites ended in the period of the Roman Empire but the Arab–Israeli conflict stated in 1948. Gary "Roach" Sanderson (talk) 20:01, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
- Contacted protecting admin, so I slashed my request out. Gary "Roach" Sanderson (talk) 20:09, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:22, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
- Response received from protecting admin. Samsara 05:02, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Requesting immediate archiving... Samsara 05:02, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Content dispute between multiple editors which is leading to reverts and an edit war. Adamgerber80 (talk) 18:22, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined, seems to have stopped.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:10, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed: BLP policy violations –
Too many messed-up claims of death by established and IP users. - FlightTime (open channel) 18:52, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
- It's similar to what happened at Tom Petty, and I recommend the same remedy: only admins should be able to edit the article until reliable sources confirm that Cassidy has died, assuming that happens (I'd be happy if it didn't). Strawberry4Ever (talk) 19:41, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
- Done Pending changes as well as semi protection is what was done and it looks ok now. Enigmamsg 20:05, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing, mostly from IP addresses making nonsensical changes. JOEBRO64 11:52, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:32, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Too much vandalism from several non-autoconfirmed today. — Luchesar • T/C 15:46, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 20:34, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Excessive vandalism. Entranced98 (talk) 17:22, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mz7 (talk) 22:10, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Various IP users continues to change contents/introduce factual errors that are not according to source. Raritydash (talk) 18:14, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mz7 (talk) 22:14, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Unconstructive updates and additions from multiple IPs today. My name isnotdave (talk/contribs) 20:15, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 20:32, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 20:32, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
22 November 2017
Protection: Vandalized once this month; often (if not always) vandalized this year. Not one edit by IP has been good especially by looking at the first page of the history logs. –George Ho (talk) 10:59, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 11:16, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Apparent edit war going on over this image. I am not involved. theinstantmatrix (talk) 15:38, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
- The image does in fact not seem appropriate for the article. The picture is about mobile plans in Portugal, where you can purchase additional packages that don't count towards the mobile data cap of your existing plan. This means you can buy e.g. 1 GB of general data, but if you're a heavy user of streaming websites, you can buy a package so that they don't count towards your 1 GB cap. There is no throttling or restricting involved and you can use your 1 GB however you want. Portugal does, in fact, have net neutrality, as does every EU country by EU law, and cable internet in Portugal does not have data caps in general or any other restrictions. As an example: https://www.meo.pt/pacotes/mais-pacotes/fibra/net-voz
- Furthermore, there has been an increased amount of vandalism in the article. Instead of using the section specifically about the US, people are now flooding sections like the general heading with US-internal politics that don't concern net neutrality in general. Any and all US-internal net neutrality politics should be restricted to the US section, as is done with every other country.
- Comment: I've been watching this page for the past several days; the sheer amount of disruptive editing and content disputes justify protection (in my opinion). Codyorb (talk) 19:47, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
- Fully protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 20:03, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary full protection/semi protection: High level of vandalism. SpacePucky (talk) 18:19, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. Reaper Eternal (talk) 18:32, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. LG-Gunther : Talk 02:39, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Question: Is pending changes not working? CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:13, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 17:07, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: The vandalism was just to much to wade through in PC -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 17:07, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
Extended-confirmed protection: High level of user vandalism. – JocularJellyfish TalkContribs 00:08, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
- Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 05:03, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 03:17, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Samsara 05:09, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – A bunch of newbies arrived here yesterday, and have been mucking about without any explanations, or any regard for verifiability. Vanamonde (talk) 14:51, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 14:58, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – On-going addition of unsourced speculation, which also contradicts happens of a television soap opera. livelikemusic talk! 03:50, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:46, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Not a very straight-forward case of edit warring as the actual edits differ, but its obvious from the Talk page and edit summary that there is an edit war going on. A Full Page Protection would help while seeking a third opinion.
I.e.:
- If Jytdog disagrees, they can revert me themself
- Great. More conflict of interest editing
- 2 independent editors have gone through a lot of effort to write a neutral article which has consensus. Stop reverting it it your previous version
- Changes to remove blanket statement
- BLP violation. Giving edit war warning and notice of the DS. Zhanzhao (talk) 04:15, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite pending-changes: Persistent vandalism – very frequent vandalism, long history of vandalism, 8 IPs in just over a week. –72 (talk) 13:40, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected indefinitely. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 13:47, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: All of edits of the past month have been either IP vandalism or reversions of IP vandalism. -Indy beetle (talk) 11:52, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 12:50, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Perennial target of disruptive IP editing, vandalism etc. Entranced98 (talk) 12:25, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 12:55, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: All of edits are IP vandalism and would need protection of the page. MuzzammilB (talk) 12:27, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected indefinitely. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 12:59, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-Protection : Please apply semi-protection on this article for a period of 3 weeks to prevent frequent unnecessary changes. There is no confirmed release date of the movie as of yet so protecting the article would also prevent users from adding a date merely on the basis of speculation. Ghost No One (talk) 12:40, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 12:56, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: The parent template is only on semi-protection, so why should this one be any different?. — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 06:15, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
- Question: Did you ask Callanecc? CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 11:02, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
- Done Thanks for the ping CambridgeBayWeather. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:08, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 12:54, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
- Librarians in popular culture (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- User talk:Geo Swan (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
- Jack Letts (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi-protection: High level of further IP vandalism.
I have been wikistalked, for months -- see this recently closed SPI. This edit, and its repeat, to Librarians_in_popular_culture, follow the same pattern of my wikistalkers other wikistalking reversions.
They have also been leaving harrassing messages on my user talk page. Geo Swan (talk) 00:15, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
They tried their stunts on Talk:Jack Letts. (Protecting the article also protects the talk page?) Geo Swan (talk) 00:22, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. for the first two--Ymblanter (talk) 07:42, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined for Jack_Letts, no disrupting editing in the article so far, we need to wait until they get there.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:42, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Frequent vandalism because of being featured in a prominent indian article 1. MayureshK 11:01, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 11:17, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
Unprotection: No history of vandalism . Japanesealphabet (talk) 17:01, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined That's because it's been protected. As a template used when warning users, and used on many hundreds of pages, it's probably best left that way. Why would anyone want it unprotected? fish&karate 11:45, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism, WP:BLP. Ghmyrtle (talk) 08:21, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:54, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Repeated vandalism from newly created accounts. There is an attempt to add Controversy section with politically motivated language, with links from websites that are from opposite political camp. The page is being used to settle political scores. Wikiindianguy 09:00, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:57, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism / unconstructive editting by ip editors. Spike 'em (talk) 10:34, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:59, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – There's an editor on a changing IP, claiming that they wrote an analysis of the series which is include in the articles, and constantly tried to remove either "their" name or the whole analysis itself. -- AlexTW 02:43, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:41, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Due to current real-world events, I believe it best to protect this page until things settle down, to avoid further disruptive editing, etc. livelikemusic talk! 02:56, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:44, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Various IPs adding unverifiable changes to the coaches. Possible true but currently 100% unverifiable and possibly vandalism. Possibly only one day needed if true. Yosemiter (talk) 03:13, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:44, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Note that at this point this isn't a content dispute. The anon user is using various IP addresses to edit war extensively against several users. The text is dubious and based on personal blogs or outright misrepresentation of sources. Same problem at Honorary Aryan. Volunteer Marek 03:35, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
- I concur with this request. See also Honorary Aryan below. Beyond My Ken (talk) 05:43, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
- I have semi-protected the article for three weeks due to edit warring by an IP editor. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 06:07, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 06:22, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Cullen328. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:45, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism, unsourced content, non notable persons added by a sockfarm. 2601:188:180:11F0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 04:02, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:48, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
Extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – Page seems to be on the radar of someone who appears to just follow Niteshift around. Sir Joseph (talk) 21:12, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 week., after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Can you point me to the articular ArbCom ruling? -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 21:21, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- @Dlohcierekim: There is not one on this, but was on the NRAs talk page that is not what they have edited out. Sir Joseph and Niteshift36 are editing against what was discussed on the NRA talk page. Someone tried to remove it by claiming a run on sentence. Niteshift36 has followed me to several edits I have made and reverted this. When you locked the page it was after Sir Joseph reverted what was talked about on the talk page that is now in Archive. I ask you revert their edits that were discussed on the talk page for a bit and added a months ago. Thanks ContentEditman (talk) 23:58, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. AIRcorn (talk) 05:09, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AustralianRupert (talk) 10:15, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Seems to be a target of new usernames(possibly the same person) vandalizing the page. 331dot (talk) 09:49, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. User blocked, too. Anarchyte (work | talk) 09:56, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Same as Racial policy of Nazi Germany listed above. Given the content, probably the same person edit-warring against multiple editors. Beyond My Ken (talk) 05:31, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for three weeks due to edit warring by IP editors. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 06:13, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 06:22, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Cullen328.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:45, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. -- (Radiphus) 07:07, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:45, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
Supercharger (album) - Was indeffed by User:Dabomb87 on 15 May 2011 - Admin has not edited since January 2014 - doubt that 6.5 years later this article is target for vandalism, and need for continued protection has been questioned on talk page. - Arjayay (talk) 21:58, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
Supercharger (album) - Was indeffed by User:Dabomb87 on 15 May 2011 - Admin has not edited since January 2014 - doubt that 6.5 years later this article is target for vandalism, and need for continued protection has been questioned on talk page. - Arjayay (talk) 21:58, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary Semi-Protection: High risk of IP vandalism and continued changes after he suffered a major injury. Ajdeluca4 (talk) 22:04, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:52, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent hopping IP vandal. - FlightTime (open channel) 00:28, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 05:07, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection Persistent vandalism. Lots of childishness going on today. Don't know the cause, don't care. oknazevad (talk) 00:43, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 05:04, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant vandalism from many different ip addresses. . EMachine03 (talk) 00:57, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 01:22, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Non-stop vandalism and mass blanking since 25 October 2017. Since the vandal is an IP-hopper, semi-protection would be a helpful solution. 1 to 3 month. Wario-Man (talk) 02:21, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
- Let's start small and then increase as needed. Samsara 05:02, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 05:02, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An IP has decided they really don't like Bratwurst. Or at least the article. Innumerable removal of content for at least two days. Ifnord (talk) 04:13, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
- Putting it on 10 days semi. If they continue not liking Bratwurst, I suggest trying pending changes. Samsara 04:57, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 04:57, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. RolandR (talk) 22:23, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 23:10, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and disruptive editing by IPs and new users due to the popular nature of the page topic. James (talk/contribs) 23:05, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 23:28, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
Unprotection: Content dispute no longer an issue. Both POV users have been blocked for sockpuppetry, Iridescentbutterfly and QuietestMoments. Also see protecting Admin's comment. - FlightTime (open channel) 21:36, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Unprotected CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 23:32, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- @CambridgeBayWeather: Thank you. - FlightTime (open channel) 23:34, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: - Unsurprisingly, the anon-IP and redlink trolls are out in force. --Tenebrae (talk) 20:50, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 20:59, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Content dispute/edit warring – *sigh* NOT this again. Two unknown IPs, which I traced are two similar ones according to the WHOIS tracker, keeps deleting the line "These were the last edition of the awards." in the 2014 section when they really were; I think these two unknown IPs may belong to that of the now-banned user StealthForce, who kept on edit warring this page last year. Johnnysama (talk) 21:13, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:51, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent spamming. KH-1 (talk) 22:09, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:54, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection Persistent vandalism due to the 2017 Zimbabwean coup d'état, especially now that Mugabe has resigned as president. Strawberry4Ever (talk) 22:21, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:58, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
23 November 2017
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from IP users. User 261115 (talk) 17:27, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 19:33, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Vandalism involved the players name and information about the football team. Shafiqabu (talk) 18:41, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 19:35, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Sock puppetry highly likely by using multiple IP addresses . Hummerrocket (talk) 18:46, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 19:37, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism creating fictitious album and single titles, chart placings and certifications, bizarrely all set in the future: [80], [81], [82], [83], [84], [85], [86], [87], [88], [89], [90], [91], [92], within the last three months. IP address varies each time, so perhaps a range block isn't possible, but they all seem to be from the Greater Manchester area of England. Richard3120 (talk) 19:05, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 19:39, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 19:39, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. -- AlexTW 19:06, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:13, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 19:42, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 03:22, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. - I see two instances of vandalism in the past week by IP editors. Two more by blocked vandal accounts. If vandalism does escalate please bring the article back here. fish&karate 12:01, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – LTA/Supersonic vandal. Denniss (talk) 16:36, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Acroterion (talk) 16:51, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk • contribs) 18:38, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 19:27, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
Asking for (temporary) Semi-protection, as the talkpage is being haunted by a long-term, IP-hopping vandal who insists that Wikipedia bow to its WP:OR opinions.--Mr Fink (talk) 00:32, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked: 173.75.1.146 (talk · contribs) blocked by Ad Orientem. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:25, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Slow burning edit-warring by IPs, yet again. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:20, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 13:01, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Related to Ticket:2017112310003026. The vandalism isn't particularly intense but something like this sitting around for two and a half hours on an article that's getting ~8,000 daily views suddenly because of Net Neutrality isn't ideal. If not immediate protection, it definitely needs actively monitored for protection. GMGtalk 12:58, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. Any more trouble and we'll set you know who on them. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:00, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated attempts to add unsourced reception from a dynamic IP editor. —Farix (t | c) 03:35, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 11:47, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Transcluded in editnotice. QEDK (愛 ☃️ 海) 09:38, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
- Template protected indefinitely. fish&karate 12:05, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Unstoppable disruptive editing by block evasion user. Seems there is no ending to this kind of behaviour with the using of many IPs. See Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Albert20009. Molecule Extraction (talk) 12:08, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The article has just come off one month pending changes, and I can't see a single IP edit that was kept, so escalating accordingly. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:38, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Disruptive editing and vandalism from IP addresses. Musicpoplover12 (talk) 02:05, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:24, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
Draft:Tiger Pan
Create protected - Recently deleted again per CSD G5 (mainspace Tiger Pan is already protected). Thanks, —PaleoNeonate – 02:46, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – this page has been protected in the past and has been repeatedly created after the expiration of protection. i suggest indef protection. . Saqib (talk) 10:13, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
Full protection: Disruptive editing/ page hijack. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 23:33, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Done -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 03:14, 22 November 2017 (UTC):
Not done -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 03:14, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: split it in two -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 03:14, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Kind regards ChocolateRabbit 22:58, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alexf(talk) 23:27, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
A recent spate of vandalism from various addresses and an account.Breaking sticks (talk) 23:19, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alexf(talk) 23:28, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
EastEnders characters
- Bianca Jackson (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Whitney Dean (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Branning family (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Hopefully protection will force the editors involved to come to a consensus. JuneGloom07 Talk 18:28, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:44, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism by adding silly made-up claims about his career. . Sjö (talk) 20:39, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:45, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Brojam (talk) 21:53, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:46, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Callmemirela 🍁 talk 18:08, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
- Not done, it seems to have calmed down now, and I'd like to think cooler heads will now prevail going forward. --Floquenbeam (talk) 18:30, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 19:31, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Jauerback. Samsara 20:19, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by multiple IP editors. RA0808 talkcontribs 19:34, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 20:21, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
24 November 2017
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk • contribs) 17:20, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 21:33, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – As today is Black Friday, this page will mostly be a highly visible page and a lot of IP and non-autoconfirmed users vandalised and added spam to this page. Pkbwcgs (talk) 19:13, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
- Better at this point after so many past temporary semi-protections to just indefinitely protect the article to prevent such users from causing those problems. That would save everyone trouble for the future. Snuggums (talk / edits) 19:43, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 21:36, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – multiple IP vandalism going on during the last few days. -★- PlyrStar93. →Message me. ← 19:46, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 21:43, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
Full Protection: Damaging IP vandalism concerning an ongoing courtcase. Gaylegrant22 (talk) 15:34, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 17:21, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: Noting that this reads like an advert. Noting that protection was requested by SPA who makes note of negative content or its removal. At any rate, the edit warring is disruptive, we must carefully weigh negative content. No discussion took place on talk page prior to request for protection. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 17:21, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Dee03 14:21, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 20:33, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Coderzombie (talk) 15:54, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of four days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 20:46, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – kind of massive IP vandalism these two days. -★- PlyrStar93. →Message me. ← 16:07, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Enigmamsg 17:03, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
- BLP subject has used two different names on film projects but has not undergone a formal name change that can be sourced to WP:RS standards. SPA IP Editor/s have opinions about this, resulting in IP disruption to change name back and forth without sufficient sourcing. After reverting repetitive disruption, I just semi-ed it for a month. Posting here for transparency/review, due to having edited the article and talk in the past to fix the sourcing.
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - CorbieV ☊ ☼ 20:33, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Elevated level of vandalism by Ole Miss fans...this will probably go away in a week or so. Jacona (talk) 20:37, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:41, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page is continuously vandalised and dubious sources are used which are actually not academic but used to give the appearance of truth for political purposes, no matter what those political purposes may be. I propose this semi-protection be put into place indefinitely due to the nature and popularity of the page. . Rìgh (talk) 06:37, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:48, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – Following a failed RM on 16 October 2017, it was snuck through RM/TR on 31 October as an "uncontroversial technical request" by the same user. Given that the previous RM had failed, this was a fraudulent request, so I have reverted this move. Temporary move protection requested as to prevent the user in question from moving the page back without discussion. ONR (talk) 10:06, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. SoWhy 10:34, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Please protect in 1 week anonymous vandalism. --Ongeian Dog (talk) 10:21, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
- Ready blocked. --Ongeian Dog (talk) 10:26, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked. SoWhy 10:33, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
- So much for "You can edit this page!" ;-) Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:46, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continual unsupported and unexplained changes by various IP editors, and edit warring between them. William Avery (talk) 10:37, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:47, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Community portal (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Indefinite full-protection: High traffic page. Felicia (talk) 22:57, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:15, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Snuggums (talk / edits) 06:03, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:22, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary or indefinite semi-protection: This article is a secondary front in the Monkey selfie copyright dispute. The image in question is being removed against consensus about every two days, about half the time by IPs. Might be useful to cut down on that circus a little. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 07:31, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SoWhy 10:38, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Many anonymous editors tring to add unsourced information to the Availability section. MrNeo (talk) 07:46, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SoWhy 10:36, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 23:53, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:17, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Sudden wave of vandalism to BLP page. Operator873CONNECT 04:00, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:18, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Removal of maintenance templates. Slightlymad 04:24, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:19, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Re-insertion of trivia. ViperSnake151 Talk 05:18, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:21, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – I would full protect this myself, but I've been involved in disputes about this before (notably school outcomes), and I take a very wide view of INVOLVED, so asking another admin to review. The page history today is nothing but reverts of different material. No 3RR that I can tell, but edit warring involving multiple editors. I think full protection is warranted, but would prefer another set of eyes. . TonyBallioni (talk) 02:52, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
- Full protected. SQLQuery me! 03:13, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:26, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator SQL.--Ymblanter (talk) 05:59, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent corporate COI whitewashing/spam despite various talk page warnings. Citobun (talk) 07:20, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
- Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. If this continues, intervention against the editors must be sought.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:01, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent vandalism – keep on vandal by ip and new user account. Matthew_hk tc 18:26, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., I do not see why extended confirmed is needed, but if I missed some confirmed socks pls reprotect.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:06, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Simplexity22 (talk) 22:22, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:15, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary Semi protection edit warring by an IP hopper for over 5 days now. Capitals00 (talk) 13:26, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 13:27, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:42, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Dlohcierekim. Alexf(talk) 03:46, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-Protection vandalism pages. --Ongeian Dog (talk) 13:54, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alexf(talk) 03:47, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism from 122.58.231.251 (talk). SCRM 1292 (talk) 17:21, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alexf(talk) 03:46, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: WP:BLP violations. 188.29.165.158 (talk) 17:23, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:28, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alexf(talk) 03:42, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. 188.29.165.152 (talk) 22:50, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alexf(talk) 03:41, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
Long-term semi-protection: An IP-hopping editor, geolocated to the same place as Verdú, has been repeatedly blanking the parts of the article about an investigation that determined Verdú to have committed sexual harassment, for over a week, since the results of the investigation were made public. In the meantime other IP editors have been pushing non-reliable sources into the article concerning a student petition to have him fired (see article talk for an RFC on this issue). The article needs some stability, not only to let the RFC run, but also to prevent the documented material on harassment from being whitewashed out of the article. I'm too WP:INVOLVED or I'd do it myself. —David Eppstein (talk) 22:59, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alexf(talk) 03:41, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – User:RomanEmpireXX and User:GunSlinger77 (possible sock puppets?) engaged in edit warring over valid references. Operator873CONNECT 23:22, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:29, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator C.Fred. Alexf(talk) 03:40, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: An anon who uses multiple IPs was seen removing a certain text in the infobox section of this article without giving any valid reason. The original IP address is already blocked last week but the anon vandal changed his IP address and continued the vandalism in this article. This has been going on for more than a week already. See 1, 2, 3, 4 for vandalism evidence. -WayKurat (talk) 02:12, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alexf(talk) 03:43, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 03:25, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:30, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alexf(talk) 03:44, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Super High level of IP vandalism. The real data was deleted and filled with bogus and false information about this football player. Shafiqabu (talk) 03:42, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alexf(talk) 03:45, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of vandalism. 188.29.165.158 (talk) 17:17, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 19:18, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite full protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 19:51, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
- Not done Looks to me like you are arguing with them on their talk page. Might be better to leave them alone. They can certainly remove messages after they see them. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 20:01, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary or long-term semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 23:41, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. GABgab 01:04, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
25 November 2017
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated addition of the nonexistent category Category:Carpathian Trophy by IPs. -KAP03(Talk • Contributions • Email) 05:24, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose. No any vandalism in this edits. Correct recategorization per subcat rule and addition of the eponymous category which to be created (for six related tournament articles). 185.26.183.19 (talk) 09:20, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of vandalism. Pending changes protection has proved ineffective. 188.29.165.184 (talk) 13:30, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined User warned. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:39, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Massive attack pages and vandalism user talk pages by User:Taiki0409 IP sock, see Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Taiki0409. LG-Gunther : Talk 13:36, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 13:51, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined That didn't look like an attack page. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:43, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated edits by the same IP inserting extremely POV and unencyclopedic content over the last couple days. FyzixFighter (talk) 14:34, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: two ip and one user keep on adding copyvio logo to the article as well as unsourced content. Despite one ip had be blocked. It reappeared as another one. Dealing with dynamic ip seem require page protection from ip and new registered user. Matthew_hk tc 16:09, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 18:10, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. power~enwiki (π, ν) 19:14, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
- Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 19:47, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Previously protected, currently a zealous attempt to get a name inserted. Ifnord (talk) 19:28, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 19:57, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Edit warring. 92.40.248.33 (talk) 13:41, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
- Not done. IPs should read WP:UNCONF. Favonian (talk) 13:42, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite full protection: Not a template. Luna935 (talk) 14:15, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Nakon. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:45, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary pending-changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP hopper persistently inflating sales. Bennv3771 (talk) 15:42, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:54, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – slow, but continuous non-autoconfirmed disruptive editing, mostly the kind that would naturally occur at the target page of this redirect, (Wikipedia:About) which has been semi'd indefinitely. I would ask that the same protection be applied to this page. Due to the capitalisation of the page title it is unlikely to ever be changed from the redirect that it is now, and is therefore unlikely make much of a difference any non-autocomfirmed users wishing to contribute constructively. . –72 (talk) 16:01, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected indefinitely. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 18:06, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term abuse from Maelbros, a known hoaxer and vandal whose focus is on children's media. Blake Gripling (talk) 06:43, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:12, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary extended-confirmed protection: High level of vandalism, even though the page has been semi-protected, fully protected, and semi-protected repeatedly for a long time, the edits have become too much, irrelevant info is posted, and there is too much disruptive vandalism in spite of implementation of various protection levels. Please apply extended-confirmed protection. Rajinimurugan1977 (talk) 08:14, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator DMacks . CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:17, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Xzinger (talk) 12:44, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
- Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:29, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Xzinger (talk) 12:45, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
- Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:34, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – persistent IP user opinions contrary to medical evidence. Zefr (talk) 23:55, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined, we do not protect pages against one IP, and they seem to have stopped anyway.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:53, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Promotional intent, using a Wiki bio to create a resume of professional achievement. 2601:188:180:11F0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 01:44, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined Semi-protection is not going to help here, and I do not want to full-protect this just yet. This might need to go to AfD, in which case the page should be editable. I've warned the primary offender: they may require further warnings and/or need to be reported at some point. Vanamonde (talk) 13:00, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
Marth (Fire Emblem) and Florante at Laura
- Marth (Fire Emblem) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Florante at Laura (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi-protection An anon vandal repeatedly uses multiple IPS and deliberately attacking Zzuuzz as a summary. Please see Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/My Royal Young for further details. 99.109.85.105 (talk) 04:29, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined The IP has been globally blocked, no further action is needed. Vanamonde (talk) 13:02, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The score is still regularly being changed (this is what led to the last temporary protection). — TORTOISEWRATH 05:29, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 16:59, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – repeated vandalism, with insertion into the article of a threat not to stop. John from Idegon (talk) 06:19, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:03, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of vandalism. 92.40.249.105 (talk) 10:57, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:50, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page continues to be highly vandalized by IP accounts. VietPride10 (talk) 04:40, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 13:14, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Supreme Genghis Khan (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi-protection: Persistent sock puppetry by Supreme Genesis Khan themselves. 188.29.165.130 (talk) 06:47, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined, not at the level of immediate action, and it is very kind of them to inform us of their sockpuppets at the appropriate venue.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:53, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. 92.40.249.105 (talk) 08:36, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined, looks like content dispute to me.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:06, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Due apologies for over-ruling you, Ymblanter, but what I'm seeing here is self-promotion. Vanamonde (talk) 13:16, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Some angry fans out there. May be worth protecting until the end of tournament (8 days). AIRcorn (talk) 10:08, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:51, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism commenting on height from autoconfirmed users, semi not good enough here. Iggy (talk) 22:54, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked. Samsara 23:10, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
- With previous expiry:
- Extended confirmed protected Samsara 23:13, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism attempting to add invalid entry "Donald Trump" to this disambiguation page. Numerous temporary semi-protections have expired: I suggest indef. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 07:11, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
: Fully protected--Ymblanter (talk) 08:01, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
Automated comment: @Ymblanter: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 08:20, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
Create protection: Repeatedly recreated. LinguistunEinsuno 11:40, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
Pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Frequent vandal changes on age of the person. Simranpreet singh (talk) 17:09, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
- Already done by administrator K6ka. AustralianRupert (talk) 05:50, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. RiceKid (talk) 19:14, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:55, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk • contribs) 21:39, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
- I just edited the page in response to an IP's edit, and have enabled indef pending changes, which I consider uncontroversial but helpful. I would endorse a brief semi, perhaps 3 to 5 days, but will not enact it myself due to the edit I just made. Regards, Samsara 22:06, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:58, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent vandalism – Long-term disruptive edits and crude vandalism. Note also it's about post–1932 American politics. — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 02:42, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Samsara 04:00, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Editors cannot keep up with persistent vandalism. —hike395 (talk) 07:19, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:59, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Jumping IPs adding unsourced changes and factual errors. -- Dane talk 01:10, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:33, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator TonyBallioni. Samsara 03:56, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP hopper continuously removing what they believe is "false info.". jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk • contribs) 01:51, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AustralianRupert (talk) 04:46, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots and lots of unsourced speculation about his next (completely unannounced) coaching job. . EricEnfermero (Talk) 04:52, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AustralianRupert (talk) 05:13, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Appears to be being targeted by serial ip vandal. Nightfury 15:51, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 20:38, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Please protect for one month. Repeated addition of unsourced information from IP addresses. Coderzombie (talk) 16:51, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Also, I see lots of constructive editing by unregistered users. MelanieN (talk) 21:29, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Height comment vandalism. Iggy (talk) 22:49, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Widr. Samsara 23:12, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
Extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – Even with semi-protection, unsupported/poorly sourced additions still get inserted. Snuggums (talk / edits) 19:37, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
- Using existing expiry:
- Extended confirmed protected Samsara 21:50, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
- To prevent dropping to unprotected status:
- Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 21:50, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. –72 (talk) 20:41, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:03, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Paul Erik. Samsara 22:07, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – BLP issues. Apparent IP hopping. Grayfell (talk) 22:08, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 22:14, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 22:14, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
26 November 2017
- User talk:Franklin le malin 2017 qui mangeait des épinards à la crème roti lol (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
Full protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Hastiness (talk) 12:32, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined Not sure what the heck is going on here, but a user talk page shouldn't be protected from editing by its owner except in extreme circumstances which I do not believe have arisen. Vanamonde (talk) 12:53, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- @Vanamonde93: The disruption has resumed. Hastiness (talk) 14:57, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: I've blocked Hastiness for disruptive editing. -- ferret (talk) 15:02, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- @Vanamonde93: The disruption has resumed. Hastiness (talk) 14:57, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of vandalism. Hastiness (talk) 13:41, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:11, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined Doug Weller talk 16:26, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
Full protection: Disruptive editing. 109.181.38.53 (talk) 14:17, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:27, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Can this page get a little more protection? IP vandalism continues with pending changes. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 15:05, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:28, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Been going on for a while. Hummerrocket (talk) 15:28, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Samsara. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:31, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
Pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Long term vandalism on this page. Not bad enough to really warrant semi (I think) but at least PC would help. Majora (talk) 16:19, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:32, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – anonymous editors trying to whitewash this. Doug Weller talk 16:21, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:33, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and addition of nonsensical content. Call me when you get the chance (We need to talk) 16:28, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:34, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Hirolovesswords (talk) 16:49, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:37, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant vandalism by Canada-based IP sockpuppets. Areaseven (talk) 13:06, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:21, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continual disruptive editing. Boomer VialHolla! We gonna ball! 13:07, 26 November 2017 (UTC). Boomer VialHolla! We gonna ball! 13:07, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:22, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent block evasion by Dopenguins via IP. Mirokado (talk) 13:28, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 13:55, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Edgar181. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:23, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Two IPs have vandalized this page in the last seven days. —Bey WHEELZ Let It RIP!✉📝Sign 13:42, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:25, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Hastiness (talk) 13:51, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:11, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:26, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Samsara. Doug Weller talk 16:27, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Speculation re subject in press has promoted numerous anon IPs to add unsourced rumour into BLP. Egghead06 (talk) 13:54, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:26, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This BLP getting vandalised due to subject being in the news. Saqib (talk) 16:15, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Doug Weller talk 16:30, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continued removal of information from the page without a good explanation. Likely a person or persons trying to remove "bad" information. Past protection not effective. 331dot (talk) 02:18, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: See below Vanamonde (talk) 07:32, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- Requesting immediate archiving... NeilN talk to me 16:41, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. LinguistunEinsuno 09:05, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 09:09, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 09:53, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent block evasion by Dopenguins via IP. Mirokado (talk) 13:29, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 13:55, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- Already done by administrator Edgar181. Alexf(talk) 14:59, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of vandalism by IP's and newly registered accounts. Hastiness (talk) 06:44, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined Two users have been blocked, and one seems to have heeded their warning: while a new user has also made constructive contributions. So I don't see the point. Vanamonde (talk) 07:38, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: edit warring against consensus version. D4iNa4 (talk) 09:25, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I normally wouldn't fully protect the page with so little of a dispute / edit war history and length, but this article subject is under two very contentious topics (conflict in the middle-east, and rape), one of which I believe is under discretionary sanctions (WP:ARBPIA). Because of this, I'm much more inclined to take action sooner than usual to keep the editing environment acceptable and collaborative for all users. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 09:59, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – On seven occasions an anon IP with different IPs each time has removed referenced information without comment. It is pointless to warn IP as they return with a dufferent address. Article protection would temporarily prevent further disruptive editing. Egghead06 (talk) 11:44, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 12:48, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: persistent disruptive editing (introduction of factual errors) by IP hopper. JimRenge (talk) 11:46, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 12:49, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Serial vandalism with an unflattering image of Paul Stanley (offending diff) shows this template's vulnerability due to its high transclusion count and common placement at the top of user pages. It's a soft target with high value for vandaleers. - GS ⋙ ☎ 08:48, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- Template protected - This is a highly used template on user pages (including admins and functionaries). It should be template protected due to its high use and potential for error that would affect many user pages. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 09:43, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Seeking 3 months protection Persistent vandalism over months from multiple IP editors. Tom (LT) (talk) 09:09, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The vandalism is not so massive as to require semi, and there are some constructive ip edits. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 09:13, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism over months from multiple IP editors. Tom (LT) (talk) 09:10, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 09:54, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – 6-12 months protection High visibility page Persistent vandalism over months from multiple IP editors. Tom (LT) (talk) 09:11, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 09:54, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
Block templates
- Template:Uw-nfimageblock (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Template:Uw-pablock (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Template:Uw-sandboxblock (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Indefinite template protection: High risk templates. 92.40.249.105 (talk) 08:54, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:20, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
- I didn't report them due to disruptive activity. I reported them due to being high risk templates. 94.197.120.244 (talk) 21:57, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined 0 or 1 transclusions NeilN talk to me 03:59, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Philippine IP's have been used by My Royal Young. Iggy (talk) 00:03, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- /24 rangeblock laid down, let's see how that does, and for the one above. Acroterion (talk) 00:04, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:08, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. The vandal is, pardon me, a lunatic who has been creating hoaxes and presenting himself as a king for 8 years. He was recently very active in vandalizing Talk:Bosnia and Herzegovina. I would appreciate further help in dealing this nuisance. Surtsicna (talk) 00:36, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: An anon vandal from Philippines repeatedly using multiple IPS as an LTA by My Royal Young. 99.109.85.105 (talk) 03:28, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:38, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked. No further vandalism after IP ranges blocked. NeilN talk to me 03:52, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Edit-warring/content dispute. The reverting editor has been advised about edit-warring on their talk page and does not indicate any willingness to stop. MPS1992 (talk) 02:36, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- Suggest semi-protection. MPS1992 seems to not have looked at the history of the article. --NeilN talk to me 03:16, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- ... in which NeilN has already reverted to re-add the disputed content. This is a content dispute between multiple editors. MPS1992 (talk) 03:20, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- @MPS1992: Look at the talk page. See any constructive posts by IPs or drive-by editors beyond IDONTLIKEIT? I don't. See any posts by established editors discussing the material and sourcing? I do. Any ongoing dispute there? --NeilN talk to me 03:26, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sorry, NeilN, I think a brief full lock would do good here. We can consider a long term semi once this has expired, perhaps. Vanamonde (talk) 07:32, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism, WP:BLP violations. 2601:188:180:11F0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 04:03, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 04:11, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
Short temp semi: Persistent vandalism from IP-hopping editor. Beyond My Ken (talk) 04:26, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 07:36, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by multiple IPs (potentially one IP-hopping vandal). RA0808 talkcontribs 04:46, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AustralianRupert (talk) 05:39, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
Full-protection: High level of continuous IP vandalism. Giverandnotaker (talk) 13:28, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Alexf(talk) 15:53, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @Giverandnotaker: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:06, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
- Early life (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Radio career (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. To deter unreasonable editing 1 week and monitor Giverandnotaker (talk) 00:08, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 04:08, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @NeilN: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 04:24, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- Requesting immediate archiving... Malformed request but page has been protected. NeilN talk to me 04:26, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism on a BLP. StAnselm (talk) 00:19, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 03:55, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Marianna251TALK 22:14, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:52, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Kuru. MelanieN (talk) 01:54, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruptive editing/vandalism. Boomer VialHolla! We gonna ball! 22:20, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:57, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing from IP addresses making overly promotional edits and continually adding broadcast times (see WP:NOTTVGUIDE) despite requests. Ravensfire (talk) 22:44, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 02:00, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. WNYY98 (talk) 22:55, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 02:03, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism seems to be due to recent sexual assault/abuse allegations. It should be semi-protected until the legal process and news coverage dies down. . Jith12 (talk) 23:00, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 02:05, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruptive editing, addition of unsourced content/factual errors, and general vandalism. Boomer VialHolla! We gonna ball! 19:57, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:45, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing from multiple editors. Page needs to be protected until any disputes can be resolved. Boomer VialHolla! We gonna ball! 20:29, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:48, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Marianna251TALK 21:40, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AustralianRupert (talk) 23:52, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP and recently created accounts attacking. Ifnord (talk) 21:58, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:52, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Kuru. MelanieN (talk) 01:49, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent and repeated trolling from a long-term abuser. Blake Gripling (talk) 22:00, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:53, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
27 November 2017
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing by multiple IP sources making unsourced POV edits (or with sources that support the opposite of their view!). Ravensfire (talk) 16:57, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Alexf(talk) 18:25, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry. Binksternet (talk) 17:02, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Favonian. Alexf(talk) 18:26, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ajit Pai related vandalism; as per request on WP:AN. power~enwiki (π, ν) 17:07, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. Primefac (talk) 17:10, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An IP user, who keeps changing IPs, keeps removing the image from the page, with no edit comment. If they at least kept one IP I could try to ask them on their talk page what their issue was, and maybe explain our policy, but since they use a different one every time, I think page semi-protection is our best bet. GRuban (talk) 17:26, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 17:41, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Dr. K. 17:48, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Alexf(talk) 18:27, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring and nobody discusses the issue on the 2017–18 Formula E season talkpage. – [93] [94] [95] [96] [97]. Corvus tristis (talk) 10:11, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 15:37, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent vandalism by the IP range Special:Contributions/2A01:E35:2ED4:1FC0:0:0:0:0/64. Binksternet (talk) 15:16, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 15:44, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. GMGtalk 15:46, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 15:50, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Airbrushing by different IPs: repeated removal of sourced content with addition of unsourced. : Noyster (talk), 10:00, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 15:06, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Recently engaged to another public figure. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 11:54, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 12:35, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- Just to point out, the above claim about 'disruptive editing' appears to be an economy of the truth to say the least. I can't see any such disruption at all - a few minor vandalism edits is all I can find in the last 24 hours. I suggest it is unprotected and see how things go. The Roman Candle (talk) 13:23, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- @The Roman Candle: Are you committing to mopping up any fall-out? Samsara 15:29, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- Just to point out, the above claim about 'disruptive editing' appears to be an economy of the truth to say the least. I can't see any such disruption at all - a few minor vandalism edits is all I can find in the last 24 hours. I suggest it is unprotected and see how things go. The Roman Candle (talk) 13:23, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. LinguistunEinsuno 13:28, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 15:01, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – ip continues to add unsourced edits. Digifan23 (talk) 00:22, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:45, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: - Just won Miss Universe. IP vandalism.--BabbaQ (talk) 03:10, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:46, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism. HapHaxion (talk / contribs) 12:54, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected indefinitely. Samsara 13:08, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection for a few days: Give it a break please. mfb (talk) 10:01, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of ten days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 12:48, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 11:49, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected indefinitely. Samsara 12:35, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 11:50, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected indefinitely. Samsara 12:35, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- temporary full protection edit warring. Capitals00 (talk) 10:59, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- Few more reverts since this request. Capitals00 (talk) 07:04, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:44, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary Semi-protection: This was protected over IP editwarring previously; the protection recently expired, and editwarring resumed immediately afterward. Chubbles (talk) 06:18, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:48, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Coaching change and a rivalry game again leading to lots of IP silliness. Semi-protection for a few days would be helpful. Zeng8r (talk) 11:24, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AustralianRupert (talk) 11:41, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. AndyAndyAndyAlbert (talk) 03:22, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined Culprits blocked. Drmies (talk) 03:26, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Liloula2200 (talk) 06:04, 27 November 2017 (UTC) Was unprotected yesterday and already vandalized !
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 08:37, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary Semi-protection: There is a persistent level of IP vandalism in the article and infobox. --Taivo (talk) 07:32, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 08:38, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. AndyAndyAndyAlbert (talk) 03:56, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 05:32, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Vandalism and Hoaxes by IP Sock of User:Taiki0409. LG-Gunther : Talk 04:13, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 05:34, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: - Vandalism after completed pageant.--BabbaQ (talk) 04:46, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 05:36, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism, addition of content promoting fan club, presumably by same spammer using multiple accounts. 2601:188:180:11F0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 15:07, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:30, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism . --Rocking987 (talk) 16:39, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:36, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 21:43, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- Already done by administrator Graeme Bartlett. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 22:12, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @Oshwah: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:27, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- It's not a protection request... lol ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 22:28, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- User(s) re-blocked with talk page editing disallowed. NeilN talk to me 00:25, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A editor from an IP keeps blanking large sections of relevant and sourced content without using the talk page. DeniedClub❯❯❯ talk? 23:11, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. 23:40, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: Error in Template:Reply to: Username not given. One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:58, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @Cyberbot I: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:13, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked. By another admin. NeilN talk to me 00:27, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High visibility, vandalism prone page owing to subject matter Vandalism unlikely to cease for above reasons Seeking indefinite protection. Tom (LT) (talk) 22:36, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:49, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism, as he is currently involved in the CFL Grey Cup game. PKT(alk) 02:41, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 02:51, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Request indef or very, very long-term protection, consistent and persistent vandalism. MB298 (talk) 02:42, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PC 1 year. NeilN talk to me 02:56, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: - recent uptick in vandalism following loss to Ohio State. JohnInDC (talk) 02:42, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 02:53, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent IP Vandal continues to vandalize page . Digifan23 (talk) 00:31, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alexf(talk) 02:43, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopper appears to be disgruntled employee/former employee. Marianna251TALK 01:01, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Alexf(talk) 02:41, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk • contribs) 01:34, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:58, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Ronhjones. -- Alexf(talk) 02:38, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Additions of unsourced content. Lizard (talk) 01:54, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alexf(talk) 02:42, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. AndyAndyAndyAlbert (talk) 02:10, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Alexf(talk) 02:40, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP user persistent vandal. C933103 (talk) 19:24, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 22:05, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs/new accounts changing his place of birth/nationality on a structural basis. This is something thats going on for a very long time (since early 2016). - LouisAragon (talk) 20:21, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 22:10, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism This page has been attracting too many 'drive-by' contributions that other editors are very good in taking care of. Nothing devestating, but a consistent annoyance and wasting of editing time. Best Regards, Barbara (WVS) ✐ ✉ 23:46, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- I'm so sorry - it is already protected. Is my face red? Is there any other alternative to reduce vandalism? Barbara (WVS) ✐ ✉ 23:48, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @Barbara (WVS): The article was only move protected. The vandalism is occasional but steady so let's try pending changes protection. NeilN talk to me 00:31, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- Thank you so much. As I said, I hate to see so much (appreciated) time spent by other editors reverting vandalism. I hope this cuts down their work. The article still needs a lot of work by those with good faith and I am very happy how you have handled this. Best Regards, Barbara (WVS) ✐ ✉ 15:45, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of small edits that are all malicious and deliberately wrong. Unfortunately mostly anything related to John Currie/Greg Schiano is being vandalized at the moment :(. DeniedClub❯❯❯ talk? 00:28, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DeniedClub can you please check the last IP edit is correct? NeilN talk to me 00:37, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- The problem is that there hasn't been an official announcement on the head coach. Reports are that it will be Greg Schiano, but currently Brady Hoke is the interim coach until an official announcement. Should I just edit the article to reflect the current, accepted facts? DeniedClub❯❯❯ talk? 00:54, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- @DeniedClub: The article should reflect the current situation, not what could happen in the future. --NeilN talk to me 00:57, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- The problem is that there hasn't been an official announcement on the head coach. Reports are that it will be Greg Schiano, but currently Brady Hoke is the interim coach until an official announcement. Should I just edit the article to reflect the current, accepted facts? DeniedClub❯❯❯ talk? 00:54, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Some news must have broken about him, because in the last few hours there has been a stream of insults and BLP violations from IP editors, including one trying to replace his picture with Benedict Arnold. Gatemansgc (talk) 22:33, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:47, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
Crabtree & Talib
- Michael Crabtree (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Aqib Talib (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: IP vandalism following skirmish. Lizard (talk) 23:09, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 23:33, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism, sports-related, should die off in a month or so. Jusdafax 23:54, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 00:14, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The Vandalize on this page on this has gotten so bad not even Cluebot can get it right . Digifan23 (talk) 00:14, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 00:18, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism --LikeASatellite (talk) 17:51, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 22:04, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: The same IP hopper that was disrupting the page earlier this month is back to adding the same unsourced content. snapsnap (talk) 17:53, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 22:05, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Rumors around him becoming coach of Tennessee Volunteers football, persistent recent changes here need to be monitored. United States Man (talk) 19:20, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:27, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Gilliam. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 22:05, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Heavy vandalism is continuing and it wouldn't be necessary to keep reverting if the protection was increased from pending changes to semi-protection. Lepricavark (talk) 19:40, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 22:09, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Hummerrocket (talk) 19:58, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:27, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Gilliam. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 22:09, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 20:01, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 22:10, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. RileyBugz会話投稿記録 20:22, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:27, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 22:10, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – The subject may or may not have died. I've yet to find a reliable source for the claim but that doesn't stop the horde of editors. Two days of full protection will give us pause to wait for journalistic confirmation. Chris Troutman (talk) 20:39, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 22:11, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Lizard (talk) 21:57, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 22:03, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
28 November 2017
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Someone is using multiple IP addresses to make single or double edits and keeps making unverifiable changes. — Calvin999 12:41, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: @Calvin999: Unverifiable? The book exists. [98] @Ymblanter: See my comment, thanks. Samsara 12:47, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- I protected it for three days because the IP hopper does not discuss their edits, but, generally, this is a content dispute, and one needs to finally go at the talk page where the IP, hopefully, will join the discussion.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:51, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- I generally try to keep established editor privilege to a minimum in such cases, i.e. if they did not make an effort to discuss at talk either, then no protection is granted. Do we need to discuss as well? ;) Cheers, Samsara 12:54, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- Yes the book exists, but it can't be verified without having the book to hand, and I don't have a copy. Also, what makes an unauthorized writer an expert on musical composition? This person is using multiple IP addresses to edit multiple articles so he or she can't be easily blocked. It's happening on several other articles. — Calvin999 14:57, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- @Calvin999: There is a problem with all of the arguments you've made. First of all, you not having a copy of the book is not a meaningful demand. I've probably written articles using many books as sources that you happen to not have at home. All of those are perfectly valid sources. There is no Wikipedia rule that says YOU have to have a copy of the book. I hope you can see that this would be ludicrous. Next, what makes an expert on musical composition? Good question. I suspect the answer is of the, "you are if other people say you are" variety, but I'd be surprised if there were a circle of dance-pop vs. RnB experts who all verify each other. Certainly my musical composition exam did not include a test of my ability to tell dance-pop and RnB apart. So in my projection, it may boil down to "Mr. Smith in his book Foo considers the song to be RnB, while Mrs. Smith in her book Baz considers it to be dance-pop". The fact that musical genre warring is among the most frequent forms of dispute on Wikipedia should give you an idea of how subjective the definition of musical genres can be. Finally,
using multiple IP addresses to edit multiple articles so he or she can't be easily blocked
is not an assertion you will be able to prove, unless the user self-incriminates. Some ISPs will simply assign a new IP address every time a person reconnects. Hence, having a new IP address every few hours can be entirely innocent. Pinging Ymblanter FYI. Samsara 15:21, 27 November 2017 (UTC)- There is actually a topic at the talk page which addresses exactly this question, but it is from 2016 and does not mention this book. In any case, this is the responsibility of the editors of the article to go to the talk page and to discuss, otherwise the protection can be upgraded to full protection, which probably nobody wants.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:25, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- Samsara I'd only expect someone who edits music articles to know, but there is such a big problem around the sourcing of genres and whether the critics are qualified for writing about music. Some songs list maybe five or six genres, half of them being unsourced. I've used books before, but not for genre interpretations. The song is reliably sourced as being a Dance-pop song with elements of New jack swing. You're completely going overboard with what I said and misinterpreting what I said. I said I don't have a copy, I don't. Of course there isn't a rule saying I need to and it is ludicrous, so what a pointless thing to say. I didn't mean that I and only I must be able to verify it. I couldn't find it on Google Books, and I don't know anyone who has it. So that's what I mean by I can't verify it. Adding it because it's in a book, well we could all do that couldn't we. That is my point about verification. Next, what I mean about being qualified is that people who REVIEW music for newspapers, online magazines etc are generally qualified to do so, so we take that as accurate. This is the writer of an unauthorized biography. While I accept there is information about Mariah herself which may be useful and accurate, how useful and accurate is his interpretation of her musical compositions? It is his opinion, and I take the line that his opinion in this circumstance is about as valid as mine, meaning I can't source myself with my opinion, like none of us editors can. You don't need to lecture me about genre warring, I spent most of my time countering it and making sure it doesn't happen by cleaning articles up with genre issues. The source for Dance-pop and hence the author is from America's biggest music magazine and one of the leading editors, so we take that as accurate. And yes I can prove it, because it's clear as anything in my watchlist that the same person is making the same edits on multiple pages of the same topic. But thanks for your input, I'm sure it has been appreciated. — Calvin999 15:41, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- And I need to challenge you again, as you keep throwing around the term "unauthorised". Most biographies are not authorised, and it is not meaningful if they are. What matters is that they be factually accurate, which has just about nothing to do with being "authorised". Yes, an authorised writer could have better access to source material, but equally, they could be paid to project a certain image that is not truthful, or be deliberately and unwittingly misled by the subject. Moreover, it seems the author has published two biographies of her (not unusual since she is still alive), only the second of which uses the "unauthorised" label in the title. It's unclear to me that we should rely on the first book more simply because it doesn't use that label... Next, just because a person has written a book rather than a newspaper snippet about a new album or single is not a solid argument against their ability to reasonably assign a genre to a song. In fact, a person could be writing for the music section of a newspaper and also be writing books. Samsara 15:53, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- I never even said anything about a first book. You've missed the point of what I said. He is someone writing about her and her life. It is useful for information about her life, but for things about music, such as genres, his opinion is no different to mine. I could say it's pop-rock but I have nothing to back that up with. Billboard is a more reliable source for the genre than his biography is, and that is the line that should be taken. — Calvin999 17:34, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- Or you take it to the talk page and establish a consensus with regards to it. 2A02:C7F:708D:B600:D559:E2E9:B3A:77DB (talk) 19:11, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- And I need to challenge you again, as you keep throwing around the term "unauthorised". Most biographies are not authorised, and it is not meaningful if they are. What matters is that they be factually accurate, which has just about nothing to do with being "authorised". Yes, an authorised writer could have better access to source material, but equally, they could be paid to project a certain image that is not truthful, or be deliberately and unwittingly misled by the subject. Moreover, it seems the author has published two biographies of her (not unusual since she is still alive), only the second of which uses the "unauthorised" label in the title. It's unclear to me that we should rely on the first book more simply because it doesn't use that label... Next, just because a person has written a book rather than a newspaper snippet about a new album or single is not a solid argument against their ability to reasonably assign a genre to a song. In fact, a person could be writing for the music section of a newspaper and also be writing books. Samsara 15:53, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- Samsara I'd only expect someone who edits music articles to know, but there is such a big problem around the sourcing of genres and whether the critics are qualified for writing about music. Some songs list maybe five or six genres, half of them being unsourced. I've used books before, but not for genre interpretations. The song is reliably sourced as being a Dance-pop song with elements of New jack swing. You're completely going overboard with what I said and misinterpreting what I said. I said I don't have a copy, I don't. Of course there isn't a rule saying I need to and it is ludicrous, so what a pointless thing to say. I didn't mean that I and only I must be able to verify it. I couldn't find it on Google Books, and I don't know anyone who has it. So that's what I mean by I can't verify it. Adding it because it's in a book, well we could all do that couldn't we. That is my point about verification. Next, what I mean about being qualified is that people who REVIEW music for newspapers, online magazines etc are generally qualified to do so, so we take that as accurate. This is the writer of an unauthorized biography. While I accept there is information about Mariah herself which may be useful and accurate, how useful and accurate is his interpretation of her musical compositions? It is his opinion, and I take the line that his opinion in this circumstance is about as valid as mine, meaning I can't source myself with my opinion, like none of us editors can. You don't need to lecture me about genre warring, I spent most of my time countering it and making sure it doesn't happen by cleaning articles up with genre issues. The source for Dance-pop and hence the author is from America's biggest music magazine and one of the leading editors, so we take that as accurate. And yes I can prove it, because it's clear as anything in my watchlist that the same person is making the same edits on multiple pages of the same topic. But thanks for your input, I'm sure it has been appreciated. — Calvin999 15:41, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- There is actually a topic at the talk page which addresses exactly this question, but it is from 2016 and does not mention this book. In any case, this is the responsibility of the editors of the article to go to the talk page and to discuss, otherwise the protection can be upgraded to full protection, which probably nobody wants.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:25, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- @Calvin999: There is a problem with all of the arguments you've made. First of all, you not having a copy of the book is not a meaningful demand. I've probably written articles using many books as sources that you happen to not have at home. All of those are perfectly valid sources. There is no Wikipedia rule that says YOU have to have a copy of the book. I hope you can see that this would be ludicrous. Next, what makes an expert on musical composition? Good question. I suspect the answer is of the, "you are if other people say you are" variety, but I'd be surprised if there were a circle of dance-pop vs. RnB experts who all verify each other. Certainly my musical composition exam did not include a test of my ability to tell dance-pop and RnB apart. So in my projection, it may boil down to "Mr. Smith in his book Foo considers the song to be RnB, while Mrs. Smith in her book Baz considers it to be dance-pop". The fact that musical genre warring is among the most frequent forms of dispute on Wikipedia should give you an idea of how subjective the definition of musical genres can be. Finally,
- Yes the book exists, but it can't be verified without having the book to hand, and I don't have a copy. Also, what makes an unauthorized writer an expert on musical composition? This person is using multiple IP addresses to edit multiple articles so he or she can't be easily blocked. It's happening on several other articles. — Calvin999 14:57, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- I generally try to keep established editor privilege to a minimum in such cases, i.e. if they did not make an effort to discuss at talk either, then no protection is granted. Do we need to discuss as well? ;) Cheers, Samsara 12:54, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- I protected it for three days because the IP hopper does not discuss their edits, but, generally, this is a content dispute, and one needs to finally go at the talk page where the IP, hopefully, will join the discussion.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:51, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Samsara Binksternet just reverted a whole series of edits across many Mariah Carey by someone using different IP addresses for evasion. I was right when I said it was the same person. — Calvin999 10:12, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Ymblanter. NeilN talk to me 20:12, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Template protection: High-risk template. AndyAndyAndyAlbert (talk) 13:57, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- Template protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 20:19, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Template protection: High-risk template. AndyAndyAndyAlbert (talk) 14:00, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- Template protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 20:20, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The IP vandalism continues. Largoplazo (talk) 16:14, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:51, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Samsara. NeilN talk to me 20:16, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Spate of spurious and dubious edits has restarted lately and has been persistent. Geoff | Who, me? 16:44, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:51, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Samsara. NeilN talk to me 20:16, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Long history of BLP violations. John of Reading (talk) 18:06, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 19:48, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected indefinitely. due to persistent long term, poorly sourced BLP. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 19:48, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Lordtobi (✉) 20:02, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 20:14, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Remove protection: Both Stars & Stripes and the subject's last employer have confirmed the subject's death. Please feel free to cancel the protection I had requested (which runs out on Wednesday). Connormah was the protecting admin and he indicates he's out of pocket for the time being. Chris Troutman (talk) 21:47, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:02, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: Connormah edited two hours before I wrote this, and has added a death date to the article. I have not investigated whether there were other edit-warring related issues. --joe deckertalk 01:05, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- Unprotected SarekOfVulcan (talk) 20:01, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection or PC protection: IP vandalism, obvious socks of blocked user User:Nashfulboy. Guy Macon (talk) 17:38, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 19:31, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- Martin Luther King High School (Riverside, California) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Seems to be a vandal target. 331dot (talk) 17:49, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 19:32, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued IP vandalism. Articles put on the main page should really be protected automatically... Paris1127 (talk) 18:30, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. RickinBaltimore (talk) 18:43, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Classicwiki (talk) (ping me please) 18:33, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. RickinBaltimore (talk) 18:42, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 15:22, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 15:27, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. GMGtalk 16:09, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:36, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator There'sNoTime. Samsara 17:28, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I think it's time to rmv pending protection and bring back semi. No use in users reviewing and rmv vandalism all the time. 1989 16:14, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected indefinitely. Samsara 17:26, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High proportion of IP edits are unconstructive. Minima© (talk) 16:29, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Samsara 17:27, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Samsara 17:27, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi protection: - per edit dispute.--BabbaQ (talk) 08:26, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked. -- Alexf(talk) 10:51, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Something uncomfortable added by IPs and new users. Also vandalism. . AndyAndyAndyAlbert (talk) 08:40, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- Not done I've added your talk page to my watchlist -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 10:10, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. snapsnap (talk) 14:34, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 14:39, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. KH-1 (talk) 05:19, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 13:28, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. AndyAndyAndyAlbert (talk) 09:22, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked: Tobyhoward1234 (talk · contribs). -- Euryalus (talk) 10:01, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I'm tired of seeing this pop up on my watchlist. Last semi bought a couple weeks of peace, but that's well and gone now. . GMGtalk 13:15, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 13:24, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Temporary semi-protection for a few weeks - persistent vandalism mostly regarding gender. . MB298 (talk) 05:47, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 13:03, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Long-term abuse from Bertrand101, whose MO is with Philippine radio stations. Blake Gripling (talk) 07:31, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 12:56, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Surprised we did not need to do this before. <sigh /> -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 12:56, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: BLP policy violations – child actor attracting vandals and Trolls, repeated semi protections did not really help so we should try a longer run under accepted revisions. Denniss (talk) 08:05, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 12:52, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. A sockpuppet IP, among others, is editing using personal opinions/bias viewpoints TropicAces (talk) 11:13, 28 November 2017 (UTC)tropicAces
- Question: @TropicAces: Lady Bird has very few edits, did you mean the redirect target (Coccinellidae)? If so, that doesn't appear to be at a level where I would consider protecting the page. It appears to be one editor? -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 11:59, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- @There'sNoTime: oh my bad, forgot the “(film)” on the second line (fixed it now). there was a random spike in IP edits last night but overall yeah, it’s IP user 176.61.29.135 (not sure how to link, sorry), who has eerily similar writing style, passive aggressive summaries and obsession with the film and Saoirse Ronan as User:Torah28 (who has been warned before about these pages and hasn’t edited since November 27). I don’t mean to start a witchhunt but it’s just getting annoying to someone like me who predominantly edits film pages and see these edits/get “corrected” by the same user a lot. Cheers! TropicAces (talk) 12:19, 28 November 2017 (UTC)tropicAces
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 12:49, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of dynamic IP vandalism from same range. Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 12:29, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Seems to be a target of a vandal constantly creating new usernames. 331dot (talk) 12:39, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 12:41, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – There is a persistent IP editor who insists on introducing factual inaccuracy and no sign of giving up. I am counting five attempt since October 24. Codename Lisa (talk) 11:59, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 12:00, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. JohnBlackburnewordsdeeds 12:09, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 12:15, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. AndyAndyAndyAlbert (talk) 12:14, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 12:16, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Home Lander (talk) 03:11, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 04:08, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 04:08, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Snuggums (talk / edits) 05:03, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Since the last protection I'm seeing four IP edits, of which two were helpful and two not; and one unhelpful edit that came from an autoconfirmed user. So I'm not certain that semi-protection is the way to go here. Vanamonde (talk) 05:19, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Lordtobi (✉) 06:49, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 10:12, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Persistent vandalism regarding country of birth by IPs that I believe to be the same user. Catherine vbb (talk) 07:59, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 10:11, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary Semi-protection: After recent political news events, seems to have had a spat of vandalism by IPs, trying to change her name to "Pocahontas" - as a derogatory (and incorrect) term. Rohaq (talk) 09:01, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 10:08, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. LG-Gunther : Talk 09:14, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 10:07, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. UltraMagnusspeak 23:44, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked. Will watch for more. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 00:03, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 04:13, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 03:46, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked. I saw one editor today adding unsourced material. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 03:57, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Should take care of the infrequent drive-by addition of unsourced material. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 04:01, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. 46.251.126.237 (talk) 05:07, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vanamonde (talk) 05:16, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection. (Or may try semi-protection first if you insist, but nothing short of indefinite WP:BLUELOCK is likely to help much; most problematic editors are registered SPAs who already pass 4/10, and the time-scale is longer than any typically applied temporary protection period.) WP:BLP that is written like a resume, with participation by multiple SPAs. See Talk:Nadya Okamoto. —Syrenka V (talk) 22:14, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 22:51, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- List of television and radio stations in Naga, Camarines Sur (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. LG-Gunther : Talk 22:18, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 22:53, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Vandalism by an IP who refuses to provide source or use the talk page High level of IP vandalism. Nikhilmn2002 (talk) 01:47, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 02:49, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 17:00, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 22:41, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Same disruptive edits here and on Sa Re Ga Ma Pa L'il Champs 2017. Ravensfire (talk) 17:01, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 22:42, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent changing of sourced (and highly reliable) content by a roving IP within the past month. Not a content dispute, since they haven't provided adequate rationale to dispute the existing source. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 20:06, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 22:45, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by Canadian IP user and sockpuppets. Areaseven (talk) 01:16, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 02:46, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by Canadian IP user and sockpuppets. Areaseven (talk) 01:19, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AlexiusHoratius 02:47, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Ravensfire (talk) 22:53, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:32, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Note that the protection was done by Yamaguchi先生, I'm just reporting that. --joe deckertalk 00:50, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Hirolovesswords (talk) 23:02, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 200 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --joe deckertalk 00:44, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Requesting semi-protection for edit-warring going on. Mathglot (talk) 00:26, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Socking. NeilN talk to me 02:29, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Highly temporary Semi-protection: News just broke that he is considered a candidate for him being head coach at Mississippi State, but has not been confirmed. Therefore, this falls under WP:CRYSTAL cause people aren't waiting for full confirmation. It might not even happen! Gatemansgc (talk) 23:24, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 00:15, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term IP vandalism. IP edits are almost always reverted within the last year, but pending changes may be a consideration too. Kingofaces43 (talk) 23:31, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected indefinitely. My favorite was that MD's are not really doctors. As a nurse, I cannot stop giggling. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 00:12, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of vandalism, with refernce to the current Trump/Warren spat. Haploidavey (talk) 00:18, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --joe deckertalk 00:30, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Disruptive editing by IP user, who is using multiple IPs to make edits. – Sabbatino (talk) 21:21, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 22:48, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Mass changes to table design without participating in related discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film#User splitting award lists by decades & disabling sortability. . AldezD (talk) 21:53, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 22:49, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent multi-IP vandalism - probably due to his recent television appearance(s). –72 (talk) 22:02, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 22:50, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Consistent vandalism. Nihlus 22:12, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 22:48, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Difference in application of Wikipedia:Gender_identity#Legal_name. - FlightTime (open channel) 16:32, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Not enough disruptive activity to lock it down yet. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 16:44, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: necessarily required for the newly crowned Miss Universe as a range of IP Vandalism happening around the article since her victory which is always needing for revertion.--Arsh 18 (talk) 19:17, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 22:43, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Brojam (talk) 19:20, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 22:44, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – As soon as the page was unprotected, vandalism ensured. Hummerrocket (talk) 19:21, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 22:44, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Seems to be being attacked by anons while I'm a Celeb is on TV currently. GimliDotNet (talk) 20:48, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:02, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Malcolmxl5. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 22:45, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Since September 2016 there appears to be a lot of multi-IP/account vandalism, especially to the "religion" field and changing from "school" to "prison". It is slow, but extensive and isn't getting caught (I had to revert back to June). This is clearly a long term issue so a short term semi wouldn't be effective. Prosposing indef pending-changes to get the benefit of a long term protection whilst also allowing for anonymous editing, something quite a few school articles employ. –72 (talk) 21:15, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 22:46, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
29 November 2017
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by sock-hopping IP; addition of information, which is unsupported by sourced content. livelikemusic talk! 13:56, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 18:12, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Tommy1933 (talk) 15:25, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 18:15, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection:– Anonymous IP is attempting to use the page as a soapbox to promote the fringe POV that the Soviet Union lost 42 million persons in World War Two. Anonymous IP is attempting to promote the false statement that the Russian government has endorsed this fringe theory, Russian government sources cited in the article put losses at 26.6 million [99]. I have posted a link to recent academic source that maintains figure of 42 million is without foundation. The previous figure stands. On existing knowledge, the Soviet war dead were 26-27 million.[100]. Please establish temporary Semi-protection on the article.--Woogie10w (talk) 16:06, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 18:16, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing in light of news he may become Tennessee Volunteers coach. United States Man (talk) 17:23, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 18:18, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: IP vandalism resumed on expiry of recent protection. David Biddulph (talk) 17:31, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 18:19, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing and vandalism – Disruptive editing and vandalism in light of a controversy involving the subject of the article with people adding vandalistic or unreferenced/unhelpful edits to the page. Would ask for page to be reverted to non vandalism edits. Repmax (talk) 17:33, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 18:21, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I chanced upon the page and noticed that a lot of spoof content (some of it almost humorous) had been added. I reverted recent anonymous IP changes back to something approaching a version supported by the citation, but the changes have quickly now been reverted twice. Paul W (talk) 17:43, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 18:22, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 18:24, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Unprotection: The article is semi protected indefinitely. There’s no need for PC1 anymore. 1989 (talk) 15:21, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Series of sock editors of blocked account seeking to restore article to their preferred edits. Nat Gertler (talk) 11:50, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 17:57, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Constant anon edits at present claiming he is dead with no confirmation yet of his death in any news media outlet. Arkady Rose (talk) 12:02, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 18:00, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP and new user POV, uncited and counter-MOS edits. Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 12:18, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 18:02, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Hummerrocket (talk) 13:55, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 18:07, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Hummerrocket (talk) 13:56, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 18:10, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 18:10, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Full-protection: This article Vladimir Plahotniuc is the victim to an edit war for 2 or 3 months. There was multiple destructive edits, reversion and adds of content meant to denigrate the subject. Me and other editors tried to have a dialog with the user AlbertPenfold on his Talk page, but unfortunatelly didn't find a concensus, he continues to add controversies and questionable poorly sourced material, to add sub-sections that are irrelevant and un-necessary; the section content is added mostly in chronological order, and not by subject; he is putting those libelous headings just to draw attention on them and transforms that article into an attack page. In this order of idea i kindly request the Full page protection of Vladimir Plahotniuc (english version). Please to keep the page protected as edited by Wikilaj (talk | contribs) at 20:28, 12 November 2017. Wikilaj (talk) 15:36, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will be asking for a SPI. NeilN talk to me 17:49, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Vandalism and Hoax edits by User:Brianmagallano IP Sock. LG-Gunther : Talk 03:58, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of X, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 04:03, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @MelanieN: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 04:24, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Sorry, copied the wrong template. MelanieN (talk) 11:15, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP edit warring of spurrious material. There have been several IP's but they're clearly the same person.Cúchullain t/c 14:39, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:43, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Press speculation relating to subject causing numerous IPs to add unsourced rumour etc to BLP. Egghead06 (talk) 14:47, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:41, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Mattythewhite. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:04, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Someone is using multiple IP addresses to make single or double edits and keeps making unverifiable changes. — Calvin999 12:41, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: @Calvin999: Unverifiable? The book exists. [101] @Ymblanter: See my comment, thanks. Samsara 12:47, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- I protected it for three days because the IP hopper does not discuss their edits, but, generally, this is a content dispute, and one needs to finally go at the talk page where the IP, hopefully, will join the discussion.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:51, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- I generally try to keep established editor privilege to a minimum in such cases, i.e. if they did not make an effort to discuss at talk either, then no protection is granted. Do we need to discuss as well? ;) Cheers, Samsara 12:54, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- Yes the book exists, but it can't be verified without having the book to hand, and I don't have a copy. Also, what makes an unauthorized writer an expert on musical composition? This person is using multiple IP addresses to edit multiple articles so he or she can't be easily blocked. It's happening on several other articles. — Calvin999 14:57, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- @Calvin999: There is a problem with all of the arguments you've made. First of all, you not having a copy of the book is not a meaningful demand. I've probably written articles using many books as sources that you happen to not have at home. All of those are perfectly valid sources. There is no Wikipedia rule that says YOU have to have a copy of the book. I hope you can see that this would be ludicrous. Next, what makes an expert on musical composition? Good question. I suspect the answer is of the, "you are if other people say you are" variety, but I'd be surprised if there were a circle of dance-pop vs. RnB experts who all verify each other. Certainly my musical composition exam did not include a test of my ability to tell dance-pop and RnB apart. So in my projection, it may boil down to "Mr. Smith in his book Foo considers the song to be RnB, while Mrs. Smith in her book Baz considers it to be dance-pop". The fact that musical genre warring is among the most frequent forms of dispute on Wikipedia should give you an idea of how subjective the definition of musical genres can be. Finally,
using multiple IP addresses to edit multiple articles so he or she can't be easily blocked
is not an assertion you will be able to prove, unless the user self-incriminates. Some ISPs will simply assign a new IP address every time a person reconnects. Hence, having a new IP address every few hours can be entirely innocent. Pinging Ymblanter FYI. Samsara 15:21, 27 November 2017 (UTC)- There is actually a topic at the talk page which addresses exactly this question, but it is from 2016 and does not mention this book. In any case, this is the responsibility of the editors of the article to go to the talk page and to discuss, otherwise the protection can be upgraded to full protection, which probably nobody wants.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:25, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- Samsara I'd only expect someone who edits music articles to know, but there is such a big problem around the sourcing of genres and whether the critics are qualified for writing about music. Some songs list maybe five or six genres, half of them being unsourced. I've used books before, but not for genre interpretations. The song is reliably sourced as being a Dance-pop song with elements of New jack swing. You're completely going overboard with what I said and misinterpreting what I said. I said I don't have a copy, I don't. Of course there isn't a rule saying I need to and it is ludicrous, so what a pointless thing to say. I didn't mean that I and only I must be able to verify it. I couldn't find it on Google Books, and I don't know anyone who has it. So that's what I mean by I can't verify it. Adding it because it's in a book, well we could all do that couldn't we. That is my point about verification. Next, what I mean about being qualified is that people who REVIEW music for newspapers, online magazines etc are generally qualified to do so, so we take that as accurate. This is the writer of an unauthorized biography. While I accept there is information about Mariah herself which may be useful and accurate, how useful and accurate is his interpretation of her musical compositions? It is his opinion, and I take the line that his opinion in this circumstance is about as valid as mine, meaning I can't source myself with my opinion, like none of us editors can. You don't need to lecture me about genre warring, I spent most of my time countering it and making sure it doesn't happen by cleaning articles up with genre issues. The source for Dance-pop and hence the author is from America's biggest music magazine and one of the leading editors, so we take that as accurate. And yes I can prove it, because it's clear as anything in my watchlist that the same person is making the same edits on multiple pages of the same topic. But thanks for your input, I'm sure it has been appreciated. — Calvin999 15:41, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- And I need to challenge you again, as you keep throwing around the term "unauthorised". Most biographies are not authorised, and it is not meaningful if they are. What matters is that they be factually accurate, which has just about nothing to do with being "authorised". Yes, an authorised writer could have better access to source material, but equally, they could be paid to project a certain image that is not truthful, or be deliberately and unwittingly misled by the subject. Moreover, it seems the author has published two biographies of her (not unusual since she is still alive), only the second of which uses the "unauthorised" label in the title. It's unclear to me that we should rely on the first book more simply because it doesn't use that label... Next, just because a person has written a book rather than a newspaper snippet about a new album or single is not a solid argument against their ability to reasonably assign a genre to a song. In fact, a person could be writing for the music section of a newspaper and also be writing books. Samsara 15:53, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- I never even said anything about a first book. You've missed the point of what I said. He is someone writing about her and her life. It is useful for information about her life, but for things about music, such as genres, his opinion is no different to mine. I could say it's pop-rock but I have nothing to back that up with. Billboard is a more reliable source for the genre than his biography is, and that is the line that should be taken. — Calvin999 17:34, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- Or you take it to the talk page and establish a consensus with regards to it. 2A02:C7F:708D:B600:D559:E2E9:B3A:77DB (talk) 19:11, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- And I need to challenge you again, as you keep throwing around the term "unauthorised". Most biographies are not authorised, and it is not meaningful if they are. What matters is that they be factually accurate, which has just about nothing to do with being "authorised". Yes, an authorised writer could have better access to source material, but equally, they could be paid to project a certain image that is not truthful, or be deliberately and unwittingly misled by the subject. Moreover, it seems the author has published two biographies of her (not unusual since she is still alive), only the second of which uses the "unauthorised" label in the title. It's unclear to me that we should rely on the first book more simply because it doesn't use that label... Next, just because a person has written a book rather than a newspaper snippet about a new album or single is not a solid argument against their ability to reasonably assign a genre to a song. In fact, a person could be writing for the music section of a newspaper and also be writing books. Samsara 15:53, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- Samsara I'd only expect someone who edits music articles to know, but there is such a big problem around the sourcing of genres and whether the critics are qualified for writing about music. Some songs list maybe five or six genres, half of them being unsourced. I've used books before, but not for genre interpretations. The song is reliably sourced as being a Dance-pop song with elements of New jack swing. You're completely going overboard with what I said and misinterpreting what I said. I said I don't have a copy, I don't. Of course there isn't a rule saying I need to and it is ludicrous, so what a pointless thing to say. I didn't mean that I and only I must be able to verify it. I couldn't find it on Google Books, and I don't know anyone who has it. So that's what I mean by I can't verify it. Adding it because it's in a book, well we could all do that couldn't we. That is my point about verification. Next, what I mean about being qualified is that people who REVIEW music for newspapers, online magazines etc are generally qualified to do so, so we take that as accurate. This is the writer of an unauthorized biography. While I accept there is information about Mariah herself which may be useful and accurate, how useful and accurate is his interpretation of her musical compositions? It is his opinion, and I take the line that his opinion in this circumstance is about as valid as mine, meaning I can't source myself with my opinion, like none of us editors can. You don't need to lecture me about genre warring, I spent most of my time countering it and making sure it doesn't happen by cleaning articles up with genre issues. The source for Dance-pop and hence the author is from America's biggest music magazine and one of the leading editors, so we take that as accurate. And yes I can prove it, because it's clear as anything in my watchlist that the same person is making the same edits on multiple pages of the same topic. But thanks for your input, I'm sure it has been appreciated. — Calvin999 15:41, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- There is actually a topic at the talk page which addresses exactly this question, but it is from 2016 and does not mention this book. In any case, this is the responsibility of the editors of the article to go to the talk page and to discuss, otherwise the protection can be upgraded to full protection, which probably nobody wants.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:25, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- @Calvin999: There is a problem with all of the arguments you've made. First of all, you not having a copy of the book is not a meaningful demand. I've probably written articles using many books as sources that you happen to not have at home. All of those are perfectly valid sources. There is no Wikipedia rule that says YOU have to have a copy of the book. I hope you can see that this would be ludicrous. Next, what makes an expert on musical composition? Good question. I suspect the answer is of the, "you are if other people say you are" variety, but I'd be surprised if there were a circle of dance-pop vs. RnB experts who all verify each other. Certainly my musical composition exam did not include a test of my ability to tell dance-pop and RnB apart. So in my projection, it may boil down to "Mr. Smith in his book Foo considers the song to be RnB, while Mrs. Smith in her book Baz considers it to be dance-pop". The fact that musical genre warring is among the most frequent forms of dispute on Wikipedia should give you an idea of how subjective the definition of musical genres can be. Finally,
- Yes the book exists, but it can't be verified without having the book to hand, and I don't have a copy. Also, what makes an unauthorized writer an expert on musical composition? This person is using multiple IP addresses to edit multiple articles so he or she can't be easily blocked. It's happening on several other articles. — Calvin999 14:57, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- I generally try to keep established editor privilege to a minimum in such cases, i.e. if they did not make an effort to discuss at talk either, then no protection is granted. Do we need to discuss as well? ;) Cheers, Samsara 12:54, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- I protected it for three days because the IP hopper does not discuss their edits, but, generally, this is a content dispute, and one needs to finally go at the talk page where the IP, hopefully, will join the discussion.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:51, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Samsara Binksternet just reverted a whole series of edits across many Mariah Carey by someone using different IP addresses for evasion. I was right when I said it was the same person. — Calvin999 10:12, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Ymblanter. NeilN talk to me 20:12, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Template protection: High-risk template. AndyAndyAndyAlbert (talk) 13:57, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- Template protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 20:19, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Template protection: High-risk template. AndyAndyAndyAlbert (talk) 14:00, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- Template protected indefinitely. NeilN talk to me 20:20, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The IP vandalism continues. Largoplazo (talk) 16:14, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:51, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Samsara. NeilN talk to me 20:16, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Spate of spurious and dubious edits has restarted lately and has been persistent. Geoff | Who, me? 16:44, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:51, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Samsara. NeilN talk to me 20:16, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection or PC protection: IP vandalism, obvious socks of blocked user User:Nashfulboy. Guy Macon (talk) 17:38, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 19:31, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- Martin Luther King High School (Riverside, California) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Seems to be a vandal target. 331dot (talk) 17:49, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 19:32, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Long history of BLP violations. John of Reading (talk) 18:06, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 19:48, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected indefinitely. due to persistent long term, poorly sourced BLP. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 19:48, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued IP vandalism. Articles put on the main page should really be protected automatically... Paris1127 (talk) 18:30, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. RickinBaltimore (talk) 18:43, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Classicwiki (talk) (ping me please) 18:33, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. RickinBaltimore (talk) 18:42, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by an IP who has continued to vandalize page the moment the protection was taken down. This page has a history of high levels of IP vandalism, especially from Chicago area (for whatever reason). Please ensure that the last article version prior to revert is not from IP.
- Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. NeilN talk to me 19:50, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.
- Declined Honyarism, there have been zero IP edits to the article. NeilN talk to me 19:52, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated addition of Supergirl as a series to universe for several months against consensus on talk page and notes on article. Brojam (talk) 19:54, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Not enough disruptive activity on the page that I can see. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 19:58, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Supposed, the subject has a new album to be released 1 December. Please protect until 12:00 UTC on 1 December to avoid the anon edit warring. Walter Görlitz (talk) 20:00, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:47, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Lordtobi (✉) 20:02, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 20:14, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. - FlightTime (open channel) 20:42, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:45, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Remove protection: Both Stars & Stripes and the subject's last employer have confirmed the subject's death. Please feel free to cancel the protection I had requested (which runs out on Wednesday). Connormah was the protecting admin and he indicates he's out of pocket for the time being. Chris Troutman (talk) 21:47, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:02, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: Connormah edited two hours before I wrote this, and has added a death date to the article. I have not investigated whether there were other edit-warring related issues. --joe deckertalk 01:05, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- Unprotected SarekOfVulcan (talk) 20:01, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Remove protection: Both Stars & Stripes and the subject's last employer have confirmed the subject's death. Please feel free to cancel the protection I had requested (which runs out on Wednesday). Connormah was the protecting admin and he indicates he's out of pocket for the time being. Chris Troutman (talk) 21:47, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:02, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: Connormah edited two hours before I wrote this, and has added a death date to the article. I have not investigated whether there were other edit-warring related issues. --joe deckertalk 01:05, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- Unprotected SarekOfVulcan (talk) 20:01, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Home Lander (talk) 03:30, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Have had long time problem with this article....seem to have block evasion. Semi would help a lot. . Moxy (talk) 04:50, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
- Comment: A rangeblock on 2407:7000:817c:1730:5906:3419:91d1:f3d/58 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) would also work here. Home Lander (talk) 04:55, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 11:23, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Repeated content removal by IP hopper w/o explanation. Jim1138 (talk) 11:06, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
- OPPOSE: User:Jim1138 introduced duplicate coordinates, wrong link to county seat with label shiretown (sic!) instead of municipal seat, and addition of unused IB fields. 78.55.174.129 (talk) 11:08, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
- COMMENT: User:Jim1138 should use article talk instead of 3RR edit warring. He seems to have no clue of correct terminology (cf municipal seat). 78.55.50.157 (talk) 11:11, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 11:28, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit warring by User:Michael 182. See also Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User:Michael 182, WP:DE to award list articles. AldezD (talk) 19:21, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked: Michael 182 (talk · contribs) blocked by Black Kite. MelanieN (talk) 03:43, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism of a specific type. Requesting the page be protected until JoJo's is no longer airing on Toonami. Ipatrol (talk) 01:03, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 03:54, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Home Lander (talk) 04:48, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
- Creation protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:57, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Short-term semi-protection. An IP hopper is doing that thing where they replace a sports team's owner's name with the name of an opposing player who got the best of that team. The Blackhawks have a game later this evening and this should pass by then. CityOfSilver 06:26, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:00, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: People are adding new American distributor and release date to infobox. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 07:17, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:01, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of tedious, repetitious, but persistent IP and new user vandalism. EronTalk 07:38, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:06, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. - FlightTime (open channel) 21:26, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked. If socks show up, please let me know. NeilN talk to me 00:39, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Data been vandalise and misinformation added. Shafiqabu (talk) 22:50, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. NeilN talk to me 00:12, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
It is taken from Talk page and made by Hororoka.
Semi-protection: is requested because
- Continuous disruptive editing by IPs and vandalism.
- Content dispute - Disputed content without giving source is added. An example is given below.
- Unknown users are editing continuously and spreading communal violence.
- Unknown editors are spreading linguistic hatred.
- This page is spreading hate against Maharashtra state and Marathi language.
- Real information is being hidden on purpose to pursue goals of certain communities.
Here is an example of vandalism made by IPs old-edit
With hundreds of Urdu schools, colleges and madrasas, Malegaon is a major centre of the Urdu language in modern India. Urdu is prevalent in all eastern parts of city. There are sign boards in Urdu in all parts of city — similar to undivided India.
Malegaon Municipal Corporation releases its meeting agenda's and proceedings in Urdu since 8 December 2013. Malegaon Municipal Corporation has been named with freedom fighter and first Indian education minister Maulana Abul Kalam Azad: Maulana Abul Kalam Azad Bhawan, Malegaon.[2]
Malegaon is a Muslim majority city with approximately 78.95% of the population following Islam as their religion.
Mayor : shaikh rasheed shaikh shafee
Whereas, in reality none or only partial information is correct.
CuriousPerson18375 (talk) 23:10, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. NeilN talk to me 00:11, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Three IPs have tried to change the mayor in the past two weeks, and no other changes in that time. power~enwiki (π, ν) 20:10, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- As far as I am concerned this is exactly what pending changes are for.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:16, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- OK. It's just really annoying to see this show up on my watchlist repeatedly. power~enwiki (π, ν) 20:30, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined PC enough for now. NeilN talk to me 23:54, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Da Corte has been targeted by trolls after his post (cited in the article) on the HALT Action Group page directed at Ivanka Trump. It looks like an individual has been repeatedly adding unfounded allegations. Extremely troublesome! Thank you for considering . Business ceo incroyable (talk) 20:49, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined A two day semi was implemented on Nov 19th. No vandalism after it expired. NeilN talk to me 23:56, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism on this BLP of someone who is currently in the news in the UK. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:54, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 03:51, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – Redirect is related to the Arab-Israeli conflict. Felicia (talk) 00:55, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
- Fully protected indefinitely. No need to edit redirect NeilN talk to me 01:14, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Hummerrocket (talk) 02:45, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 03:59, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Simplexity22 (talk) 03:38, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 04:01, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Lizard (talk) 21:36, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- Already done by administrator Jauerback. NeilN talk to me 00:25, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive edits by IPs. An ongoing issue. McPhail (talk) 21:45, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 00:42, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Full-protection: High level of edit-warring destabilizes the article and protecting it would bring editors to discussion more readily. Last stable version is here Jack Sebastian (talk) 23:54, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- Looks like we both had the same idea of requesting protection. Protection would definitely be beneficial, to prevent the above editor from continuing their edit-war against multiple editors.
- What is linked is also not the most stable version, as the IP's edits go against the standard method of revealing episodes prematurely; what seems to be the case is finding a version before any of my reverts (as I reverted the above edit to the stable version). Administrators also do not revert to any "stable" version before protection. -- AlexTW 00:02, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
- Fully protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 00:09, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by an IP who has continued to vandalize page the moment the protection was taken down. This page has a history of high levels of IP vandalism, especially from Chicago area (for whatever reason). Please ensure that the last article version prior to revert is not from IP.
- Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. NeilN talk to me 19:50, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism.
- Declined Honyarism, there have been zero IP edits to the article. NeilN talk to me 19:52, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated addition of Supergirl as a series to universe for several months against consensus on talk page and notes on article. Brojam (talk) 19:54, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Not enough disruptive activity on the page that I can see. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 19:58, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page is being attacked by anons (only recently had protection removed). GimliDotNet (talk) 20:53, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 23:59, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This has been going on for a reaaallly long time. Hummerrocket (talk) 21:09, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PC 2 years. NeilN talk to me 00:04, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant short-term vandalism and BLP disruption from multiple IPs. -- LuK3 (Talk) 23:02, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 00:06, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Supposed, the subject has a new album to be released 1 December. Please protect until 12:00 UTC on 1 December to avoid the anon edit warring. Walter Görlitz (talk) 20:00, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:47, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. - FlightTime (open channel) 20:42, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:45, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Recent spate of disruptive editing by IP editors. Ravensfire (talk) 21:25, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 6 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Maile (talk) 22:20, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
30 November 2017
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – There have been persistent attempts to add unsourced (albeit true) information about a non-notable "fan version" of this game by IP users. The additions only happen once every week or two (after which I remove them), so semi-protection doesn't seem viable. I've requested indefinite PC because, as I said, it's been happening over the course of a few weeks at least, and, frankly, I'm getting tired of reverting them, and they're violating WP:NOTPROMO. It seems that whoever keeps adding the info regularly checks up on this article to make sure the info stays. — Gestrid (talk) 18:58, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected indefinitely. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 20:12, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. EvergreenFir (talk) 19:16, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 100 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --joe deckertalk 19:45, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – From time to time, tech scam vandals hit this page as part of their schemes to trick people into believing in the scams. This is one of those times. The vandals hop between IPs, natch. bonadea contributions talk 20:03, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 20:14, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Vandalism and Hoax edits by User:Brianmagallano IP sock. LG-Gunther : Talk 13:51, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
- Not done; the user and the IP sock have been blocked, and there were only five vandal edits in the last 30 days anyway. fish&karate 14:21, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Vandalism and hoaxes edits by User:Bertrand101 IP sock. LG-Gunther : Talk 13:59, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
- Not done; again, user has been blocked. fish&karate 14:22, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. NicklausAU (talk) 14:27, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. fish&karate 14:59, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A month or more please, the defacing began on October 27th. This is a living person and the edits are defamatory and potentially libellous.
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. - no vandalism edits since October 29th. If it resumes please return here. fish&karate 14:12, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of vandalism. GnomeSweetGnome (talk) 16:59, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 17:55, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Subject is currently the target of sexual harassment allegations within UCSC circles, resulting in unsourced criticism and BLP violations by multiple IP editors. AlexEng(TALK) 17:32, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 18:04, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent edit warring between two apparently IP-hopping editors since 17 November. RA0808 talkcontribs 17:59, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 18:12, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent recreation (with only references to other Wikipedia pages and social media accounts) by IP who is failing to get the point that their article fails WP:NALBUMS. Ss112 18:04, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 18:14, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by multiple IPs and new accounts. RA0808 talkcontribs 18:11, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 18:16, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 18:16, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Unsourced speculative edits. Lizard (talk) 07:12, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Should be enough for the speculation to have either become reality, or not. fish&karate 14:15, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – I think this page requires indefinite semi-protection, but pending changes is the absolute minimum that is needed here. The page has seen bouts of disruptive editing from IPs on a montly basis, for nearly its entire history. Vanamonde (talk) 12:45, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected indefinitely. fish&karate
Unprotection: The article is semi protected indefinitely. There’s no need for PC1 anymore. 1989 (talk) 18:19, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
- 1989 - There are legitimate reasons for an article to have both protection levels set. Is there a particular reason this article needs its protection level changed? ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:05, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
- @Oshwah: Wouldn't the semi outweigh the PC, though? It's redundant as IPs and new editors can't edit the page anyway, which means edits that go through the semi would also go through PC without oversight. Anarchyte (work | talk) 10:50, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
- Done I don't see how it particularly matters whether PC is on or not, but as the article is indefinitely semiprotected anyway, I've removed pending changes. fish&karate 14:57, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: An XfD venue. 165.91.13.209 (talk) 05:10, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – No valid reason for page protection has been provided. Mz7 (talk) 07:18, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A month or more please, this is getting happening regularly now. Doug Weller talk 06:09, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (work | talk) 10:43, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Anarchyte (work | talk) 10:43, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Persistent addition of same content by same user with various IP addresses, not backed by the cited source. DVdm (talk) 10:35, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Vandalism and unsourced changes have been plaguing that page for ages. Hopefully long term semi will fix it. Anarchyte (work | talk) 10:40, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by IP users after recent protection removal. Areaseven (talk) 04:50, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:31, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Snuggums (talk / edits) 05:08, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:33, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Brojam (talk) 05:15, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:35, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent target of sockpuppets and ipsocks of blocked user Shiwam Kumar Sriwastaw. A short semi-protection would be helpful. bonadea contributions talk 07:42, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mz7 (talk) 08:00, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: This is a contentious ongoing event; I anticipate many edits to be made to this page in the near future and also note the potential for much POV-pushing and soapboxing. . Dschslava Δx parlez moi 08:30, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:39, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection:: persistent IP vandalism (see [102]). Quis separabit? 00:06, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:15, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from multiple IP addresses on a BLP article. Many of the edits are introducing potentially defamatory material, including a link to a website filled with insults about Kym Herjavec. Thank you. Knope7 (talk) 04:47, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mz7 (talk) 07:26, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection:: persistent IP vandalism (see [103]).
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:13, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism by several IPs and one indeffed account. Jim1138 (talk) 02:08, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 04:26, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
Permanent protection: Vandalism comes back after protection ends. -★- PlyrStar93. →Message me. ← 02:55, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 04:24, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Rumoured to be signing a contract with the Oakland Athletics. Deal is pending a physical and team confirmation/announcement. A couple days of protection should be enough. Trut-h-urts man (T • C) 03:44, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 04:23, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Becoming the target of disruptive editing due to Tennessee Volunteers rumors. United States Man (talk) 04:17, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NeilN talk to me 04:21, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion by User:MariaJaydHicky using Special:Contributions/2A02:C7F:708D:B600:0:0:0:0/64. Binksternet (talk) 18:30, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Persistent of vandalism. Users deleted the actual information and placed with incorrect information. Large amount of the information goes missing as the users kept doing it over and over again. Can't undo anymore. Shafiqabu (talk) 22:24, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 23:58, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. MB298 (talk) 23:19, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 23:59, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent tampering of the sourced genres. There's no need to keep vandalizing and warring. . — Calvin999 15:48, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- @Calvin999: If you know of genre-based disruption to multiple articles by IPs that you believe to be the same user, could you make the report in aggregate, so we can see the full spectrum of behaviours? It may or may not be possible to get a range block if it's clear that they're just being disruptive for the sake of it. Strictly speaking, WP:AIV or WP:ANI may be better venues, but I'm sure we can deal with the query here if need be. Cheers, Samsara 15:58, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
You've been told numerous times that because it was hyphenated it musn't be used as it means they (the source) has hyphenated the two as a compound noun, which usually refers to fusion/crossover in music, besides if it's been flat listed surely that isn't a bad thing, I see you do a lot of Rihanna pages and Break it Off's source call it pop-dancehall but if you were going by your own rule you would've changed the info box to say Pop-dancehall not Dancehall · pop. 2A02:C7F:708D:B600:C139:3D1F:FD3:62C6 (talk) 16:24, 27 November 2017 (UTC)(Marked as sock of MariaJaydHicky)- The original source calls TGTBAW "R&B/pop". So if we're being technical about this, both of you are wrong. Samsara 16:33, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- You yourself are saying "generally", now what you've doing is list two genres separately for a song. A song can't be two separate songs, the hyphenation, even the slash, avoids this problem. You are messing around with sourced information. The critic didn't call it an R&B and a Pop song. He called it a R&B/Pop song, that's different, whether it's hyphenated or not. That shows it's a crossover, which is exactly what you are arguing. So what is your problem? You're the only one saying not to use a hyphen. You don't seem to understand what we use what the source says, not what you think. — Calvin999 17:32, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- The original source calls TGTBAW "R&B/pop". So if we're being technical about this, both of you are wrong. Samsara 16:33, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Based off the conversation here, it looks like this content dispute needs sorting out on the article's talk page. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 23:36, 29 November 2017 (UTC)(Lowered to semi-protection. IP was confirmed as a sock user.)- Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 23:40, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – Related to the Arab-Israeli conflict. Felicia (talk) 00:53, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Persistent juvinile vandalism. Jim1138 (talk) 11:53, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Gilliam. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 23:51, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Sro23 (talk) 22:09, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 23:54, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Marianna251TALK 22:45, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 23:58, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Short-term semi-protection. While it's typical for days of the year articles to get targeted when it's that day, this one's getting an unusually high number of bad edits. I'm trying to clear out the pending protection log but I'm already at three reverts in the past hour and a half with one more pending edit, which is lowkey vandalism and inarguably junk, waiting in the queue. 12-15 hours should work. CityOfSilver 18:49, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 22:00, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism & BLP violations. Sro23 (talk) 19:13, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 20:09, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit warring on the page. Details at Talk:Hammond School (South Carolina). Rhadow (talk) 19:41, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
- Some editors have declared COI Billhpike (talk) 20:20, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
- Purleau1 posted this: "We have rallied our alumni, student, and parent base to continue this fray until it is rectified. You are welcome to contact me at 999 999-9999 (edited out) for further information." This may get worse before it gets better. Rhadow (talk) 21:06, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
- Sock puppet investigation: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Purleau1
- Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 22:05, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of reverts on BLP. JMHamo (talk) 19:56, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 22:08, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Some ip added unsourced text, please semi-protect one week, thanks!. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 21:10, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 22:10, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
- ^ http://politica.estadao.com.br/noticias/geral,partidos-mudam-de-nome-por-slogans,70001940930
- ^ Malegaon Corporation building formally named as Maulana Abul Kalam Azad Bhavan http://www.ummid.com/news/2013/November/11.11.2013/mmc-building-formally-named-after-maulana-azad.html