Jump to content

User talk:Bbb23

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Return of L.S. WikiCleaner

As predicted, they returned within seconds after their 48-hour block to revert the article again. Could you please take action? Extending the block and locking the page might be effective. Thank you! Michalis1994 (talk) 16:10, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stop calling other editors' edits you disagree with vandalism.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:12, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Wait, what? This is the same user you just blocked—evidently, they returned right after their block to revert the page again. Michalis1994 (talk) 16:15, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I assure you I know what I've done. I should have warned you at WP:ANEW for labeling edits as vandalism. It's a personal attack; stop it.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:17, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have provided sufficient evidence (diffs) to support my assertion that there were clear signs of vandalism, which was subsequently confirmed by their involvement in edit warring. I'm not sure what else to add, but I will take your warning into consideration. Apart from this, I think the article must be protected. Michalis1994 (talk) 16:21, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I need some help. Michalis1994 (talk) 16:12, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A brownie for you!

Thank you for taking care of the sock on my talk page while I'm away. I appreciate it. GSK (talk • edits) 02:25, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Removal

I removed that part because too many people are responding to me; I understand the issue by now. Pier1999 (talk) 16:41, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please, investigate this

A Catalan pro-independentist who does this and this…… We Caught it. Fake user with other purposes. Panenkazo (talk) 18:27, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

“The Penfield Homunculus manifest” messages..?

Before you close Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/The Penfield Homunculus, me, user:Eem dik doun in toene, and user:Kingsif all got a message from an ip address ( Special:Contributions/185.124.30.117 ) with the same text reading “Don't worry, I have more than 35 users spread across wikipedia with different IPs and different devices. I'm just having fun at the moment. See you at the next block. Stay tuned., and all had the same title, “The Penfield Homunculus manifest” which I will link the messages below that were listed under that IP’s contributions.. User talk:SnowieLuna1212#The Penfield Homunculus manifest, User talk:Eem dik doun in toene#The Penfield Homunculus manifest, & User talk:Kingsif#The Penfield Homunculus manifest.

Sincerely, SnowieLuna1212 (talk) 20:09, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Right, another admin blocked the IP for personal attacks just before I was going to block them for block evasion. Thanks.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:12, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If the statement is true though then he has a lot more accounts which may be logged into to start non-WP:NPOV drama again. — SnowieLuna1212 (talk) 20:14, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Naveen Pandita

Hi Bbb23, you had recently undid the edit made by M S Hasan who nominated the page Naveen Pandita for speedy deletion. He has now redirected the page to a drama named Pushpa Impossible. However, I believe there was no need to redirect the page and there were enough reasons to keep a separate page for Naveen Pandita. Kindly have a look at it. Thank you! Dimitrimascarenhas (talk) 07:01, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What's your relationship with Simonkatichaus?--Bbb23 (talk) 12:50, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nothing. I don't know who this person is. But, a few days ago he wrote a comment on the talk page of Naveen Pandita. Dimitrimascarenhas (talk) 15:31, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean?

My article, Eduard Elbogen moved to Draft:Eduard Elbogen, is based on the book of Th. Venus - supplemented with 33 citations from reliable, independent sources. Which one are you missing? --Virtualiter (talk) 11:09, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, the script used for moving articles to draft puts a canned notice on the author's Talk page about sources, even if it's moved for other reasons. I moved it because I thought the article needed a lot more work before being in article space. To be honest, I don't remember how I even ran across the article. I suggest you submit the draft through WP:AFC and an experienced reviewer will give you feedback or move it back to article space themself if they disagree with my decision.--Bbb23 (talk) 12:56, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You didn't come across the article because you quickly deleted my article on "Emil Kahane" seconds before - while I had just asked an experienced user to take a look. Or is it moved for other reasons?
Now specifically: What kind of "a lot more work" does Eduard Elbogen need, being in article space?
I'm keen to learn more. --Virtualiter (talk) 20:28, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, that explains how I came across the Elbogen article. As for my view, generally I think the article is WP:UNDUE with way too much not-noteworthy detail. It needs a lot of trimming and editing. Despite the sources, there are some parts that are unsourced, but personally I wouldn't worry about sourcing until after it is substantially trimmed. As I said, I recommend using WP:AFC for the draft because the people who review articles have far more experience in that area than I do, but policy-wise, nothing prevents you from moving the draft back to article space on your own. Some editors consider that disruptive, but technically it is not, and in this instance, I would not find it so. Your decision.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:37, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you remove your Dheerendra Singram article?ee

That article was remarkable, it is the article of a living person which is verified. You have removed it without any reason, please restore it. Chutiya1 (talk) 01:57, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Remove what?

I noticed your edit as I was looking through Special:NewPages/User, and I'm pretty confused. That's the first entry in the page's history, and there's nothing in its log either. The user has no contributions, no logged actions, and no filtered edits. What did you mean by remove what would be a U5? jlwoodwa (talk) 02:54, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The user has one edit on Meta, which was to create a userpage; you can see it if you wish. The user set up the userpage so that it was displayed on en.wiki. They don't have to edit at en.wiki to do that. Frankly, I'm not sure how it's done, but it's not important. Another user can edit the userpage at Meta but it cannot be edited anywhere else. Sort of like a transclusion I suppose. However, you can create a "local" userpage on en.wiki, which is what I did and I made it blank. In my view the text of the page qualified for WP:U5, which is the reason for my edit summary.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:17, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DivineWave

Hi Bbb23, thank you for dealing with @DivineWave. As you may have seen, I have taken at face value their assertion of being a long-time editor who happened to have switched to a new mobile device and thus had to create a new account. My request to disclose their previous account remained unanswered. Now, WP:SOCKLEGIT says that "Alternative accounts should always be identified as such on their user pages, unless where doing so would defeat the point of the account". Obviously, simply changing one's device doesn't meet the latter condition. Is it actionable then if an editor refuses to disclose the older account? Just curious (without prejudice). Austronesier (talk) 19:41, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's not "actionable".--Bbb23 (talk) 21:20, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Bbb23&oldid=1234928619"