Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2021/08/17
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![110 File:"Bell at Kyoto" circa 1890s, from book entitled - Japan (page 11 crop).jpg](#File:"Bell_at_Kyoto"_circa_1890s,_from_book_entitled_-_Japan_(page_11_crop).jpg){kind=link}
_10.jpg){kind=link}
_07.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
_&_IC_510_(I11).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_в_Тернополі.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![184 File:Водограй "Лебеді" в парку Національного відродження в Тернополі.jpg](#File:Водограй_"Лебеді"_в_парку_Національного_відродження_в_Тернополі.jpg){kind=link}
wolność_form.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
,_p81.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
DW. No FOP in Cambodia. BrightRaven (talk) 09:34, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 14:35, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Picture out of scope- 1)Doesn't contain any notable people or their house Contributers2020Talk to me here 13:53, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept - Please read the categories before nominating files. The file is very much in scope. –Davey2010Talk 14:00, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Copy violation of https://hindi.examsdaily.in/srtmun-admit-card-2021-exam?amp GreaterPonce665 (talk) 13:07, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Wdwd at 13:46, 17 August 2021 UTC: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing --Krdbot 20:24, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
The vandal uploaded my personal photo with a brutal montage. Please delete and do not skip such photos in the future Jphwra (talk) 17:44, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:20, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
probably not own work Syced (talk) 23:06, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Racconish at 09:15, 20 August 2021 UTC: Missing essential information such as license, permission or source (F5) --Krdbot 14:06, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
Not used, better version at File:Gaz Métropolitain logo.png 2605:B100:535:652D:6055:2126:47D0:5D2 05:38, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: by Taivo. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:08, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
missing of permission Unnamelessness (talk) 15:43, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Delete - Obvious copyvio. –Davey2010Talk 15:59, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: by Elcobbola. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:09, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Possible copyright violation. The uploader is Marta Wojtach, while the author and copyrigth owner (acording to metadata) is Michal Teperek. So the claim of Marta Wojtach to be the copyrigth owner is tenuous. Michał Sobkowski (talk) 19:31, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Ticket:2021081810006648 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 05:00, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
There is an VRTS email received for “File:Prof. dr hab. n. med. Zbigniew Gaciong - Rektor WUM (002).jpg” but not processed yet, ticket:2021081810006648. --Polimerek (talk) 08:31, 19 August 2021 (UTC)- I have just accepted permission for “File:Prof. dr hab. n. med. Zbigniew Gaciong - Rektor WUM (002).jpg” under ticket:2021081810006648. --Polimerek (talk) 09:41, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Permission received and verified. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:10, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Ce fichier m'appartient et viole mes droits Jean200005 (talk) 12:22, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Андрей Романенко at 15:41, 23 August 2021 UTC: Personal photo by non-contributors (F10) --Krdbot 20:02, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 11:40, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Someone who's not a Wikipedian, just trying to promote himself Osama Eid (talk) 17:45, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. --Alaa :)..! 11:40, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Screenshot of a website, the material is copyrighted unless there is evidence otherwise. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 20:23, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:35, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
The copyright holder in the metadata does not appear to be the uploader, need permission from the copyright holder to license the photo. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 20:32, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:35, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Screenshot of a copyrighted website. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 20:44, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:35, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Personal photo, Self promotional - IndrajitDas 20:51, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope. --Alaa :)..! 11:41, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Personal photo, Self promotional - IndrajitDas 20:52, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope. --Alaa :)..! 11:41, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Personal photo, Self promotional - IndrajitDas 20:53, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope. --Alaa :)..! 11:41, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Personal photo, Self promotional - IndrajitDas 20:53, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope. --Alaa :)..! 11:41, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
File:Karfa Diallo et l'association Mémoires et Partages en déplacement dans le quartier Harausta de Biarritz, rebaptisé quartier de La Négresse 10.10.2020.jpg
[edit]
Probably an image stolen from Facebook 37.171.147.74 20:53, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; pcp. --Gbawden (talk) 12:33, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Files of User:Patrícia Kiss - Patbeijo
[edit]- File:PatriciaKiss-.jpg
- File:Patrícia Kiss -.jpg
- File:PatriciaKiss.jpg
- File:PatriciaKiss-PatBeijo.jpg
- File:Patricia Kiss - Pat Beijo.jpg
Uploader suggests they are the person in the photos, need credit to the photographers and permission to license the photos. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 20:53, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; unlikely to be own work. --Gbawden (talk) 12:33, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Redundant. We have another version of this picture at File:Nags Head, Haughton.jpg. The only difference is that this one has additional white space unevenly distributed around the picture. I don't think the white space is of any practical use. bjh21 (talk) 21:42, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom - Metadata confirms this was taken at the exact same time on the exact same date with the exact same camera. –Davey2010Talk 21:50, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:32, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
article was deleted Snackmurat (talk) 22:23, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
- Uploader now requests deletion. see my talk page. Snackmurat (talk) 22:17, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:32, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
article was deleted Snackmurat (talk) 22:24, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
- Uploader now requests deletion. see my talk page. Snackmurat (talk) 22:17, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:32, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
draft article declined Snackmurat (talk) 22:25, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
- Uploader now requests deletion. see my talk page. Snackmurat (talk) 22:17, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:32, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
NC flickr license Zoozaz1 (talk) 22:27, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; fake license. --Gbawden (talk) 12:32, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Minor child. Photo was taken by older sibling while older sibling was also a minor. Snackmurat (talk) 22:40, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
- Uploader now requests deletion. see my talk page. Snackmurat (talk) 22:17, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
- Is there any merit in keeping the picture as an example of juvenile human teeth? Aavindraa (talk) 05:46, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
- I think the fact that the uploader's sole purpose for coming to WMF was to promote himself (which has been denied on all other projects) probably outweighs what little usage Commons may have for the image of this minor child. Snackmurat (talk) 12:11, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:31, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Minor child. No need on any WMF. Snackmurat (talk) 22:41, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
- Uploader now requests deletion. see my talk page. Snackmurat (talk) 22:16, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:31, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
does this business exist outside of GitHub? Snackmurat (talk) 22:42, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
- Uploader now requests deletion. see my talk page. Snackmurat (talk) 22:16, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:31, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
does this business exist outside of GitHub Snackmurat (talk) 22:42, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
if u live in Dwarka, New Delhi, India and you search this term "MrVaiBH", you will know
but you can give it a try from where you live also, 🤔
By the way, you can delete this anyway, now I don't care.
I'm gonna delete my account in few days, I'm done with Wikipedia (aka notability whore 🤣)
@Snackmurat — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mr.VaiBH (talk • contribs) 14:25, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
- Uploader now requests deletion. see my talk page. Snackmurat (talk) 22:16, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:31, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work - it is listed from Instagram and available widely on social media Evaders99 (talk) 23:04, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:31, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Contains music licensed under by-nc-sa, not compatible with COM:L Yeeno (talk) 23:08, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. The track is entirely made up of dozens of non-commercially licensed pieces of music. De728631 (talk) 16:29, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:31, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
unused personal image out of COM:SCOPE Eurodyne (talk) 04:38, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:06, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Only purpose is promotion. Related promotion on hiwiki was deleted. ☆★Sanjeev Kumar (talk) 18:46, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 20:37, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
Does not clearly show the Island of Montreal 2603:8081:1600:DD6B:A54F:EA04:53FE:D45C 19:00, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
- Keep not a valid deletion rational. OP is free to improve upon the map, but it's not a super precise map anyway so this rational isn't important to the point the map is making. Canterbury Tail (talk) 21:04, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Same as above, or improvement can be done or also can be use differently, still good. ----László (talk) 21:21, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
- Keep It does not clearly show that Prince Edward County, Ontario is a peninsula either. The level of detail is low and such abstractions are expected. Not showing the island of Montreal is not a reason to delete the image, but it is a potential reason to edit the image (assuming the level of detail will allow for it). Walter Görlitz (talk) 22:07, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
- Keep As many have already mentioned above, the scale of the map means that the Island of Montreal would be almost too small to make out anyhow. This image is still better than no image. Ottawajin (talk) 12:41, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 20:35, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
Duplication of File:Flag of Russia.svg. Fry1989 eh? 19:11, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Keep - Made the file better quality, As far as I know we don't delete duplicates here and given the filename is in Russian as well I'm not really seeing any reason to delete. –Davey2010Talk 22:37, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
- The practice is to not delete existing duplicates and superseded images, but when there are pre-existing images that are superiorly formatted that we do delete newly uploaded duplicates. I've been nominating them for years now with no opposition. Fry1989 eh? 14:38, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
- Well I've never seen this however I'd be happy for this to be deleted and redirected if preferred (i'd prefer if we keep it tbh but hey ho). –Davey2010Talk 23:30, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
- @Davey2010: See: COM:DUPE and COM:REDUNDANT. GPinkerton (talk) 15:59, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
- Well I've never seen this however I'd be happy for this to be deleted and redirected if preferred (i'd prefer if we keep it tbh but hey ho). –Davey2010Talk 23:30, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
- The practice is to not delete existing duplicates and superseded images, but when there are pre-existing images that are superiorly formatted that we do delete newly uploaded duplicates. I've been nominating them for years now with no opposition. Fry1989 eh? 14:38, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete: it’s a JPEG dupe of a clean SVG original. If a Russian-language filename is needed, then a redirect to the proper file should be created (but with correct declension — genitive padeẑ). -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 14:32, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete redundant. GPinkerton (talk) 15:59, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 20:34, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
Duplication of File:Flag of Russia.svg. Fry1989 eh? 19:11, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 20:30, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
Duplication of File:Flag of Russia.svg. Fry1989 eh? 19:11, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 20:30, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
Duplication of File:Flag of Russia.svg. Fry1989 eh? 19:11, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 20:31, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
Duplication of File:Flag of the Soviet Union.svg. Fry1989 eh? 19:11, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 20:31, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
Duplication of File:Flag of the Soviet Union.svg. Fry1989 eh? 19:11, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 20:31, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
Duplication of File:Flag of the Soviet Union.svg. Fry1989 eh? 19:12, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Are we now deleting images as "superseded"? We've always been against that before. Andy Dingley (talk) 19:33, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
- OTOH, quality is awful. Andy Dingley (talk) 19:34, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
- See my comment here. Fry1989 eh? 14:39, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per Andy. If the quality was fine it would've been a keep but it's not so delete. –Davey2010Talk 22:09, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 20:33, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
Has a copyright watermark, the name does not appear to match that of the uploader, need confirmation of the author and copyright status of the photo. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 19:52, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 20:27, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
Wunsch des Erstellers ThüringerChatte (talk) 20:17, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader requested deletion of recently created, unused content. --Wdwd (talk) 20:21, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope: advertising, not in use and not otherwise clear why this photo should be in Commons JopkeB (talk) 06:29, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:07, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope: advertising, not in use and not otherwise clear why this photo should be in Commons JopkeB (talk) 06:32, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:07, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I was going to upload SVG, but it was uploaded incorrectly. Please delete it. Gameposo (talk) 17:39, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: by Túrelio. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:08, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
- Keep as it's now used on en:w:Carbon Health. Ixfd64 (talk) 19:04, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Used in a draft but at least no longer unused. [24Cr][talk] 21:36, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams. Should be in SVG if useful.
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:07, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete both files per nom. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 13:06, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:41, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope, selfie, not in use, unclear why this pictures should be in Commons JopkeB (talk) 05:35, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:35, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
Ohne Freigabe ist "eigenes Werk" (des Wikipedia-Autors) wenig glaubhaft H7 (talk) 06:15, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:35, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
Personal image without educational use Drakosh (talk) 13:27, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:35, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
Personal image without educational use Drakosh (talk) 13:29, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:35, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
This photo violates the copyright of architect Adrian Smith, no exception (Fop) is allowed for UAE 220.246.139.184 14:36, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:36, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Iamprabhatofficial (talk · contribs)
[edit]Self-promotion only, out of project scope.
- File:PrabhatsinghBhadauriya.jpg
- File:City of London skyline from London .jpg
- File:Prabhat2000.jpg
- File:Prabhat singh.jpg
- File:Prabhat sing Bhadauriya.jpg
- File:Prabhat singh Bhadauriya.jpg
Achim (talk) 16:23, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:36, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Iamprabhatofficial (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Project scope: Commons is not private photo album
—MdsShakil (talk) 16:22, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:41, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
1951 statue by 廣井吉之助(1906-1986). Not in PD, and COM:FOP#Japan doesn't allow such statues. LudwigSK (talk) 07:57, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:20, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
Made by mistake, Category already exists.Jersey563 (talk) 16:14, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:07, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation (no freedom of panorama in the US); see Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:Martin_Luther_King,_Jr._National_Memorial ~Kevin Payravi (talk) 00:13, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 15:50, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
Violation of living sculptor w:Lei Yixin's copyright. There is no freedom of panorama for protected public works in the United States, and the statue here is not trivial that would make this image comply COM:DM United States. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:28, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:07, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
No COM:FOP in for Buildings in Philippines. Contributers2020Talk to me here 04:41, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
- Keep FOP isn't (of course) an issue unless the building is recent enough to be protected by copyright otherwise. This does not appear to be so.
- I'm concerned that you're making massive deletion requests (literally every church in Germany) on the basis of FOP, when your understanding of FOP is so wrong. Please stop. Andy Dingley (talk) 08:48, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
- Keep In this case, we have a photograph of the Don Roman Santos Building of neoclassical architecture which was built in 1894 and completed in 1955. This building is nowadays owned by the Bank of the Philippine Islands. Fortunately, someone else took a picture of a plaque at the building which tells us that the architects were Don Jose Hervas (original plans in the 19th century), Andrés Luna de San Pedro (1937 plans, died in 1952), and Don Enrique J.J. Ruiz (supervision of the 1957 restoration). {{PD-Philippines-artistic work}} applies as the building was completed prior to 1972. --AFBorchert (talk) 17:26, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Don Roman Santos Building is pre-December 1972. Also per AFBorchert. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:55, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:08, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
packaging is copyrighted Syced (talk) 23:07, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete per COM:PACKAGING. howdy.carabao 🌱🐃🌱 (talk) 15:33, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:29, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
After almost seventeen years, it would be impossible to trace the provenance for this if the uploader hadn't conscientiously noted the website where he got the photo. As can clearly be seen via archive.org, this image was on Dan Nettleton's faculty webpage at Iowa State at least six months before it was uploaded here, and there's no indication that Prof. Nettleton ever intended to release any of his images under CC, GFDL, or anything. DS (talk) 00:54, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. @DragonflySixtyseven: Good job! -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 14:57, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:31, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation 百战天虫 (talk) 01:01, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:32, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Likely copyright violation of https://dailyguidenetwork.com/my-35th-birthday-was-all-tears-frema-adunyame/ Twotwofourtysix (talk) 04:51, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:46, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Please can the uploader provide further details to confirm this file is their own work. Appears to be an image as part of an announcement for a football club and the player image is likely to be from a professional photoshoot. Unlikely to be the uploader's own work as claimed. mattbr 06:15, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:47, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation. The first publication of the image is unknown (possibly 2020, the source cites a family archive). Maxinvestigator (talk) 06:33, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:48, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation? This photo is also on https://indianexpress.com/article/education/out-of-logo-contest-students-of-open-learning-protest-du-centre-concedes-5621598/ and I see no OTRS permission JopkeB (talk) 06:43, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:49, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope: advertising, self promotion, not in use JopkeB (talk) 06:47, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:53, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope: advertising, self promotion JopkeB (talk) 06:51, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:53, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
uploader's request Narek75 (talk) 06:58, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused personal photo. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:54, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Out of scope: advertising, self promotion JopkeB (talk) 07:01, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:53, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Leyo 07:55, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:01, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
The uploader seems to be the person depicted in the photo. This isn't a selfie, so the copyright belongs to the photographer. Dubious self-work claim, missing evidence of permission (which should be confirmed via VRT) FASTILY 08:11, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per the nominator unless this can be verified by COM:VRT that the copyright holder and the uploader are the same person or that the copyright holder has agreed to give their COM:CONSENT for the file to be uploaded. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:01, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:02, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused selfie, the user's last remaining upload. Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 08:29, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:02, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Self promotion Lotje (talk) 08:48, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:03, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Self promotion Lotje (talk) 08:48, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:03, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Self promotion Lotje (talk) 08:49, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:03, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Self promotion Lotje (talk) 08:50, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:03, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope. Kleuske (talk) 09:33, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:03, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused company results graph with no indication of importance. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 09:36, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:04, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused and unexplained diagram. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 09:40, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Delete per nom: appears to be a partial screenshot or other lo-res rendering of the linked File:Minimax.svg, purpose entirely obscure.—Odysseus1479 (talk) 20:32, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:04, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Not usefull, any value for the Project Matlin (talk) 09:57, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:04, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Personal image without educational use Drakosh (talk) 13:24, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:09, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Personal image without educational use Drakosh (talk) 13:24, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:09, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Personal image without educational use Drakosh (talk) 13:24, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:09, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Personal image without educational use Drakosh (talk) 13:28, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:09, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Personal image without educational use Drakosh (talk) 13:28, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:09, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Personal image without educational use Drakosh (talk) 13:28, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:09, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Personal image without educational use Drakosh (talk) 13:29, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:09, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Personal image without educational use Drakosh (talk) 13:29, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:09, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Personal image without educational use Drakosh (talk) 13:29, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:09, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Personal image without educational use Drakosh (talk) 13:30, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:08, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Personal image without educational use Drakosh (talk) 13:30, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:08, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Personal image without educational use Drakosh (talk) 13:30, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:08, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Personal image without educational use Drakosh (talk) 13:30, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:08, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Personal image without educational use Drakosh (talk) 13:31, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:08, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
screenshot without educational use Drakosh (talk) 13:31, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:08, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Personal image without educational use Drakosh (talk) 13:32, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
- Keep: in use. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 14:45, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
- used only in draft (Инкубатор) space, and draft will be deleted soon because of no notability. --Drakosh (talk) 15:33, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, not in use. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:08, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:08, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:09, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Philip Holtappel (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:Übersicht 3 Kurs Kryptologie.png
- File:Übersicht Kryptologie 2.png
- File:Übersicht Kryptologie.png
- File:Grundlagen der Kryptologie.png
- File:Allgemeine Einführung in die Kryptologie.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:19, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:10, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Malabanti karunakar (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused charts. Should be in tabular data, MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:23, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:11, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
out of scope derivative work Mindmatrix 16:37, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:11, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
out of scope derivative work Mindmatrix 16:37, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:11, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Intended subject is not visible NightWolf1223 (talk) 16:55, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per self-nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:12, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Out scope. A photograph of an insignificant person. Used in articles created for vandalism and self-promotion. GAndy (talk) 02:16, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:48, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
Out scope. A photograph of an insignificant person. Used for self-promotion GAndy (talk) 17:25, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:13, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Unsourced image collage with at least one copyrighted character in it. Has no realistic educational use and was seemingly created purely for personal use by a user who hasn’t been active in over 13 years. Dronebogus (talk) 18:00, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:13, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Promotional image taken/uploaded by a bus transfer company, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 18:50, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:14, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Duplicate of a file I already made- thanks Ooligan (talk) 02:11, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
![02:11, 17 August 2021 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2021/08/17#c-Ooligan-2021-08-17T02:11:00.000Z-File:"Bell_at_Kyoto"_circa_1890s,_from_book_entitled_-_Japan_(page_11_crop).jpg){kind=link}
- @Ooligan: please provide duplicate filename (I can't find it...). Thanks. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:42, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- @P199: I see two similar "extracted" images from this filr here [1]. They look like they were created at the same time and date (from history page). I cannot remember, if this was the crop tool or me, but I thought I should report what appears to be a duplicate file for deletion. I thank you for your help. --Ooligan (talk) 21:34, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no duplicate (just 2 duplicate links at source page). --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:31, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
![23:31, 4 October 2021 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2021/08/17#c-P199-2021-10-04T23:31:00.000Z-File:"Bell_at_Kyoto"_circa_1890s,_from_book_entitled_-_Japan_(page_11_crop).jpg){kind=link}
_10.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_10.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by 139.59.43.62 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: no educational value. This is not a reason for speedy deletion. I allow discussion for a week. Taivo (talk) 08:56, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
_10.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:44, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
_10.jpg){kind=link}
_07.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_07.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by 139.59.43.62 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: no educational value. This is not a reason for speedy deletion. I allow discussion for a week. Taivo (talk) 08:57, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
_07.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:44, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
_07.jpg){kind=link}
Sorry! I am error. Микола Василечко (talk) 09:37, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:45, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Contains image that may be not in PD Matlin (talk) 09:59, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination, missing essential info. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:46, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
duplicate image Victuallers (talk) 10:40, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per self-nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:47, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
_%26_IC_510_(I11).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%26_IC_510_(I11).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Not allowed to publish by the railway company, only for personal use. Chewy.commuter (talk) 10:42, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
_&_IC_510_(I11).jpg){kind=link}
Comment - As a rule, you own the copyright to the photos you take. Even if the railway company says you can't use the pictures for commercial purposes, that is generally not enforceable. Ixfd64 (talk) 01:50, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:51, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
_&_IC_510_(I11).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Not allowed to publish by the railway company, only for personal use. Chewy.commuter (talk) 10:43, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:51, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Not allowed to publish by the railway company, only for personal use. Chewy.commuter (talk) 10:43, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:51, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Not allowed to publish by the railway company, only for personal use. Chewy.commuter (talk) 10:43, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:51, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Not allowed to publish by the railway company, only for personal use. Chewy.commuter (talk) 10:44, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:51, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Not allowed to publish by the railway company, only for personal use. Chewy.commuter (talk) 10:47, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:51, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Not allowed to publish by the railway company, only for personal use. Chewy.commuter (talk) 10:44, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:51, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Not allowed to publish by the railway company, only for personal use. Chewy.commuter (talk) 19:08, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:51, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Not allowed to publish by the railway company, only for personal use. Chewy.commuter (talk) 10:47, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:51, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Not allowed to publish by the railway company, only for personal use. Chewy.commuter (talk) 10:44, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:51, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Not allowed to publish by the railway company, only for personal use. Chewy.commuter (talk) 10:47, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:51, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Not allowed to publish by the railway company, only for personal use. Chewy.commuter (talk) 10:44, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:51, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Not allowed to publish by the railway company, only for personal use. Chewy.commuter (talk) 10:47, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:51, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Not allowed to publish by the railway company, only for personal use. Chewy.commuter (talk) 10:45, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:51, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Not allowed to publish by the railway company, only for personal use. Chewy.commuter (talk) 10:45, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:51, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Not allowed to publish by the railway company, only for personal use. Chewy.commuter (talk) 10:45, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:51, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Not allowed to publish by the railway company, only for personal use. Chewy.commuter (talk) 10:46, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:51, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Not allowed to publish by the railway company, only for personal use. Chewy.commuter (talk) 10:46, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:51, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Not allowed to publish by the railway company, only for personal use. Chewy.commuter (talk) 10:46, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:51, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
The picture provides wrong content and has wrong name. Web-wiki-warrior (talk) 10:54, 17 August 2021 (UTC) The picture is in use. Please to remove deletion template. Web-wiki-warrior (talk) 11:17, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:53, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
The picture provides wrong content and has wrong name. Web-wiki-warrior (talk) 10:54, 17 August 2021 (UTC) The picture is in use. Please to remove deletion template. Web-wiki-warrior (talk) 11:19, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:53, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Web sourced image, vague copyright statement on the source site, but nothing to support this CC-by-sa licence Andy Dingley (talk) 10:55, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:52, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
The description says: "From the Ministry of Land Management, Urban Planning and Construction", so it seems that it is not own work. BrightRaven (talk) 11:05, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:53, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Image sous copyright 37.171.142.101 11:12, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:54, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Image sous copyright 37.171.142.101 11:13, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:54, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 11:58, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:55, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Image sous copyright 37.171.147.74 12:30, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Bonjour
J'ai demandé l'autorisation de l'auteur Mathieu Bitton
Est ce que je dis vous envoyer une mail de sa part pour valider l'utilisation du media ?
Merci beaucoup
Gilles
--Gillescar (talk) 14:23, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:01, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Subject's consent was not obtained, private individual in a private space Dennisnash (talk) 12:55, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, as subject’s consent is obvious from subject’s stance. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 14:47, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: non-notable, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:02, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:04, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope: 2x fictional maps (Kelton or Weco Beach don't exist as depicted in the map), 1x personal file, 2x patent nonsense
- File:Kelton Map Northeast.png
- File:Kelton Map 2.7.png
- File:Having a hard time with what others think of her.jpg
- File:Xonipelo.png
- File:Gota-tenda-horsi-onli-yeta-palillion.png
Enyavar (talk) 22:24, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:11, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from posters and magazine covers. Should be blanked/cropped to keep. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: magazines are clearly DM. But likely not own work and out of scope (see Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Telis Marin). --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:27, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Proof? No clear ownership and no evidence of self work, this photo was made by his campaign and it appears to be directly taken from his twitter and can be found else where online https://www.google.com/search?tbs=sbi:AMhZZitv3O78ebIVFsaJ5u4lmcHRVyWjjtM4K0EfyOOtIyNK43_1i2Y96el4LzXVzTqOHpyY0t7J8w-qjYRegbdV6tBM07mAcbR58qUl4JpxR7eQa_1sWM1i3PJaUTF2E1a1j6jFvp5dO7cEmU5JZ8ud9SYoRqV9AZjFQgF4s8Faq8WuSUYTqp9NJ3BJj93Mi_1hlrIGMAB6agL0Ur8sgG_1BBKv52HtK6K-Ou9jXtsnI3rZjVr8ldsiZEUYg2CUFzog85wNOJG8tPNetxBZya0ShDLwI2pYtUJMEyXvc2bCcw3IriFDVcIzeo7CoT1GHJc_1EvNjF8tMb2hdhdsjA-s2dO1ZdwNeYPN912FiFSolw6Ai7sj4iitpHbGSBSuIERe90aG5RIskJk-PTQQyq1slumswcc1_1RsUY3g Putitonamap98 (talk) 15:03, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:28, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Proof? No clear ownership and no evidence of self work, this photo was made by his campaign and it appears to be directly taken from his twitter and can be found else where online https://www.google.com/search?tbs=sbi:AMhZZitv3O78ebIVFsaJ5u4lmcHRVyWjjtM4K0EfyOOtIyNK43_1i2Y96el4LzXVzTqOHpyY0t7J8w-qjYRegbdV6tBM07mAcbR58qUl4JpxR7eQa_1sWM1i3PJaUTF2E1a1j6jFvp5dO7cEmU5JZ8ud9SYoRqV9AZjFQgF4s8Faq8WuSUYTqp9NJ3BJj93Mi_1hlrIGMAB6agL0Ur8sgG_1BBKv52HtK6K-Ou9jXtsnI3rZjVr8ldsiZEUYg2CUFzog85wNOJG8tPNetxBZya0ShDLwI2pYtUJMEyXvc2bCcw3IriFDVcIzeo7CoT1GHJc_1EvNjF8tMb2hdhdsjA-s2dO1ZdwNeYPN912FiFSolw6Ai7sj4iitpHbGSBSuIERe90aG5RIskJk-PTQQyq1slumswcc1_1RsUY3g Putitonamap98 (talk) 15:04, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:28, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
A formal PR picture of an Israeli singer. It cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 15:05, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, see also Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Leebiran. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:31, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
No proof of self work? This photo could have been taken from any of the following websites https://www.google.com/search?tbs=sbi:AMhZZivvwbe5NPMoMyS3tPXJL8ZvnyNA5DymX-Wl5FM_1dKvwL-vwKdtzO887uTzY1Md5aB0QiH6TzZwgfUaVmTArffnOQIr02I-ogaG0wrYT_1058GhYY4iiRMy27Zit-WuC6oLE3zEt-T8kGdIoFWlaiGzrFvNbDRg7trRj58RhFn3YsZmGkO8PCoJa9L7fWPpE2WCh7xN_10Ge86Bc7dASz1K5fpJ1U556PkEz9zN2fIivgbICd_1OsaO2SLeKVnNP4UuZyw3HGxb8HDxnu5QlaRw-bOlpkeKnIgfc84o3JDq_1yDIRiYBMcCDONJzBecSpGt8RXM4vh6zyxcG_1obYMEu1FrHM8WqBiGjnXJ-DwBHU5lfedf8NlPE_1T9m3lD5grVk_1Z-9ztRNTQaKpVxeRD0eZlHXQOQsrKQ I assume it is her official senate portrait but NJ does not release those under PD Putitonamap98 (talk) 15:08, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:32, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:11, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, some found online. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:39, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Not own work. It was published elsewhere by Ruter AS. The copyright notice on the bottom-left says "© Truls Lange Civitas 2010-17". Stylez995 (talk) 15:23, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
- Update: The source of SVG file: http://www.civitas.no/truls-lange.html. Truls Lange / Civitas AS holds the copyright of the image. I don't think the uploader is the author of the image. --Stylez995 (talk) 15:29, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
- This is public information I guess so we can make our own. Official map of tram lines: https://ruter.no/globalassets/rutetabeller/trikk/trikk-linjekart-09082021.pdf --Erik den yngre (talk) 17:03, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Obvious copyright violation. --SMP (talk page) 14:29, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete as copyright violation. Asav | Talk 20:24, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:40, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Not the uploaders own work. No proof it's CC licenced. Exceeds the threshold for a textual logo. Tagishsimon (talk) 16:16, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:41, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Not the uploaders own work. No proof it's CC licenced. Exceeds the threshold for a textual logo. Tagishsimon (talk) 16:16, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:41, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Not the uploaders own work. No proof it's CC licenced. Exceeds the threshold for a textual logo. Tagishsimon (talk) 16:16, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:41, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Not the uploaders own work. No proof it's CC licenced. Exceeds the threshold for a textual logo. Tagishsimon (talk) 16:16, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:41, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Not the uploaders own work. No proof it's CC licenced. May exceeds the threshold for a textual logo. Tagishsimon (talk) 16:17, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:41, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Obviously not "own work", dubious origin, uploader already uploaded pictures with false titles, is therefore unreliable 89.158.97.13 16:59, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:44, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Because it is Blurry Victuallers (talk) 17:50, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
- how u see that Blurry ?! all kits are in this size Sm3a (talk) 17:56, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:44, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Because it is Nonsense Victuallers (talk) 17:52, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
- What? This makes no sense, the image is of Borussia Dortmund's home kit for the 2021/22 season. No different than File:Kit body bvb2122H.png, except without a logo per consensus on the English Wikipedia. S.A. Julio (talk) 18:43, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Just because an editor does not understand how and where a file is used does not mean it needs to be deleted. Walter Görlitz (talk) 22:30, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept: nonsense DR. In use. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:45, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Because it is Blurry Victuallers (talk) 17:53, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept: not blurry. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:46, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Because it is Nonsense Victuallers (talk) 17:53, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:47, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Because it is Blurry Victuallers (talk) 17:55, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept: not blurry, nonsense DR. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:48, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Because it is Nonsense Victuallers (talk) 18:01, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept: nonsense DR. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:48, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Definitely not own work, 1924, author not known but could be copyrighted Xia (talk) 18:22, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:51, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by C2Rio Tours & Travel (talk · contribs)
[edit]All images uploaded by a bus transfer company trying to promote themselves, 2 images are in scope however both files have different camera models so presumably these aren't the bus companys but instead the actual photographers, Thanks,
- File:Logo C2Rio .jpg
- File:Cristo Redentor - Raphael Medeiros.jpg
- File:Ônibus - Vitor Siqueira .jpg
- File:UDR 4 - Vitor Siqueira .jpg
- File:UDR 3 - Vitor Siqueira.jpg
- File:UDR 2 - Vitor Siqueira.jpg
- File:UDR - Vitor Siqueira.jpg
- File:Van - Vitor Siqueira.jpg
–Davey2010Talk 18:52, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Info The authors do not appear in the images, they were identified in the file name. People that eventually appear in the images are either tour guides or tourists in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. The photographers were hired to take pictures of tours that the company promotes. Feel free to erase the images if they violate any of the terms. By the way, C2Rio is not a bus transfer company, but a tour operator. Tours involve tour guides and/or drivers. Bus transfer companies do not need tour guides. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2804:14D:5C86:89FC:5DD9:E5D0:9C0D:F602 (talk) 20:06, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
- Keep:
- All the bus photos — these are as much in scope as all other bus photos in Commons.
- File:UDR 2 - Vitor Siqueira.jpg and File:UDR - Vitor Siqueira.jpg, as these give a perspective of the subject different of all others in Category:Escadaria Selarón.
Those were the 2 that were in scope Tuválkin howeverboth files include different camera models so it would be obvious neither of these are theres - The copyright would still remain with whoever took the images in the first place (unless both photographers released their files under a CC licence which I highly doubt). –Davey2010Talk 23:33, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
- @Davey2010: Sure enough, but the IP above at 20:06 seems to imply that this was work for hire. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 23:54, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
- But again there's no proof the photographers had licenced these under a CC licence .... As far as I'm aware work for hire is irrelevent as either way no licence has been provided?
- Also I must apologise as as you had edited 2 bus images earlier so I mistakenly thought that was what was linked above but apparently not,
- –Davey2010Talk 00:17, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
- Ah, well, that shows how little I know about copyright law… -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 11:50, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: out of scope and uncertain copyright status. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:54, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
There is no date to tell whether it is really PD in Russia. "20th century" spans a 100 years... Xia (talk) 18:59, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:54, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
This is a Fair Use image (transferred from Enwiki) which cannot be kept on Commons. --Deinocheirus (talk) 19:56, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:54, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
It has a copyright mark. Nanahuatl (talk) 20:13, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
- Comment That is not actually a valid reason for deletion, just for marking with {{Watermark}} or simply removing it. But this photo seems to be of low enough resolution and quality that it might be deleted on grounds of having no educational value that goes beyond what we already have; anyone familiar with our collection of Istanbul photos want to confirm or reject this? Tokfo (talk) 05:53, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
- @Tokfo: , it has a copyright symbol, not just the name of the creator :) But as you said, we basically have tons of images for the mosque and obviously this one will never be used.--Nanahuatl (talk) 06:20, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:55, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Just need to confirm the uploader actually took this 1946 photograph. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 20:47, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: historic photo missing essential info: original author, source, and permission. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:01, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by KurtR as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Grund|source=https://reportagen.com/content/erfundene-wirklichkeit
Converted to regular DR as username suggests that he may be the original photographer, who has today been asked for clarification (by me). -- Túrelio (talk) 07:53, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Same problem with:
- File:Claas Relotius Reporter2.png
- File:Claas Relotius Reporter3.jpg
- File:Claas Relotius Reporter4.jpg
- There is an VRTS email received for “File:Claas Relotius Reporter3.jpg” but not processed yet, ticket:2021061110007618. --Satdeep Gill (talk) 09:12, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
- There is an VRTS email received for “File:Claas Relotius Reporter.jpg” but not processed yet, ticket:2021061110007618. --Satdeep Gill (talk) 09:12, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: by Ruthven. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 09:26, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
hochgeladen zur Retusche der geschützten Fenster, will aber keiner machen. So nicht verwendbar Subbass1 (talk) 08:54, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep - "uploaded to retouch the protected windows, but nobody wants to do it. So not usable" is not a valid reason to delete an image. I'm confused as to what the issue is with the windows but either way it doesn't require deletion of the image. –Davey2010Talk 22:13, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
- The issue is that the windows (as new works) are copyright protected yet (and we regularly don't have the permission from the author, church wouldn't be sufficient). The german WP guys are somewhat picky here. Of course it's sad (also for the artist) not to be able to show so many newer churches from the inside here because of this. But retouched/"deleted" windows probably are not convincing either. --Subbass1 (talk) 02:23, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
- Ah okay, The images are all of the inside of the church and not the windows specifically so IMHO de minimis would apply here, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 23:28, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
- In no way "de minimis" fits here, imho (if it's the german "Beiwerk"). Way to prominent for that... --Subbass1 (talk) 10:29, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
- But the windows weren't taken up close nor is the camera pointing directly at the windows - The camera actually cuts off a few windows and the camera is also pointed straight ahead so IMHO it's textbook de minimis here ?, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 11:07, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
- In no way "de minimis" fits here, imho (if it's the german "Beiwerk"). Way to prominent for that... --Subbass1 (talk) 10:29, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
- Ah okay, The images are all of the inside of the church and not the windows specifically so IMHO de minimis would apply here, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 23:28, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
- The issue is that the windows (as new works) are copyright protected yet (and we regularly don't have the permission from the author, church wouldn't be sufficient). The german WP guys are somewhat picky here. Of course it's sad (also for the artist) not to be able to show so many newer churches from the inside here because of this. But retouched/"deleted" windows probably are not convincing either. --Subbass1 (talk) 02:23, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
- I'm not familiar with copyright issues in detail and in other countries but I'm shure that it doesn't fit in the "Beiwerk" scenario. But I feel honoured that someone refuses my deletion request. The possibility remains to just upload on Google Maps ;) --Subbass1 (talk) 12:48, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: This church as a whole is a modern work of architecture that is still protected by copyright, and of which inside photographs therefore aren't allowed (without permission by the rights owner), as German FoP doesn't apply to interior spaces - which makes the window question moot. Per de:Mariä Himmelfahrt (Kirchenthumbach), the architects were Hans Beckers and Josef Lorenz; Beckers died in 1984. --Gestumblindi (talk) 23:25, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
hochgeladen zur Retusche der geschützten Fenster, will aber keiner machen. So nicht verwendbar. Subbass1 (talk) 08:55, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep - "uploaded to retouch the protected windows, but nobody wants to do it. So not usable" is not a valid reason to delete an image. I'm confused as to what the issue is with the windows but either way it doesn't require deletion of the image. –Davey2010Talk 22:13, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: This church as a whole is a modern work of architecture that is still protected by copyright, and of which inside photographs therefore aren't allowed (without permission by the rights owner), as German FoP doesn't apply to interior spaces - which makes the window question moot. Per de:Mariä Himmelfahrt (Kirchenthumbach), the architects were Hans Beckers and Josef Lorenz; Beckers died in 1984. --Gestumblindi (talk) 23:25, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
hochgeladen zur Retusche der geschützten Fenster, will aber keiner machen. So nicht verwendbar. Subbass1 (talk) 08:56, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep - "uploaded to retouch the protected windows, but nobody wants to do it. So not usable" is not a valid reason to delete an image. I'm confused as to what the issue is with the windows but either way it doesn't require deletion of the image. –Davey2010Talk 22:12, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: This church as a whole is a modern work of architecture that is still protected by copyright, and of which inside photographs therefore aren't allowed (without permission by the rights owner), as German FoP doesn't apply to interior spaces - which makes the window question moot. Per de:Mariä Himmelfahrt (Kirchenthumbach), the architects were Hans Beckers and Josef Lorenz; Beckers died in 1984. --Gestumblindi (talk) 23:26, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This artwork inside a German building is by the artist Walter Womacka. Womacka died in 2010, so it is still protected until 2081. There is no freedom of panorama inside buildings in Germany. Rosenzweig τ 09:12, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 23:26, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
wrong picture Kingred (talk) 18:17, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted unused, no evident importance, uploader request. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:28, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
No COM:FOP in the United States for 3D artworks. Subject sculptures are by en:Tom Otterness who is still alive and were published between 1997 and 1999.
- File:"Rockman" statues, U.S. Courthouse, Minneapolis, Minnesota LCCN2010720744.tif
- File:"Rockman" statues, U.S. Courthouse, Minneapolis, Minnesota LCCN2010720745.tif
- File:"Rockman" statues, U.S. Courthouse, Minneapolis, Minnesota LCCN2010720746.tif
- File:"Rockman" statues, U.S. Courthouse, Minneapolis, Minnesota LCCN2010720748.tif
- File:"Rockman" statues, U.S. Courthouse, Minneapolis, Minnesota LCCN2010720750.tif
- File:"Rockman" statues, U.S. Courthouse, Minneapolis, Minnesota LCCN2010720754.tif
- File:"Rockman" statues, U.S. Courthouse, Minneapolis, Minnesota LCCN2010720764.tif
- File:"Rockman" statues, U.S. Courthouse, Minneapolis, Minnesota LCCN2010720773.tif
- File:"Rockman" statues, U.S. Courthouse, Minneapolis, Minnesota LCCN2010720785.tif
- File:"Rockman" statues, U.S. Courthouse, Minneapolis, Minnesota LCCN2010720792.tif
Howhontanozaz (talk) 05:34, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 23:51, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
copyright violation; work by living artist, no freedom of panorama. Martin Sg. (talk) 10:49, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
The copyright holder Bettina Munk gave me Mara Wallat the permission to upload the image "Installation ORIGIN 2016.jpg" mentionded above on her Wikipedia page. She is going to write an email to [email protected] to confirm this.
- Ticket:2021100310006046 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 08:00, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: now with a VRT permission. --Rosenzweig τ 02:23, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
File:Mural "Homage to a Starry Night" by Rip Cronk, located in Venice, a beachfront district on the Westside of Los Angeles, California LCCN2013632394.tif
[edit]No COM:FOP in the United States for 2D artworks. Although the photo is licensed correctly, the underlying mural is not. The mural is a 1990 work by Rip Cronk who is still alive as of May 2021 (source). Howhontanozaz (talk) 05:11, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:28, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
File:"The Essence of Rex," a 13-foot-tall bronze dinosaur statue, erected in 2014 outside Casper College's Tate Geological Museum in Casper, Wyoming LCCN2015634110.tif
[edit]No COM:FOP in the United States for 3D sculptures. Subject is a 2014 work by Chris Navarro. Howhontanozaz (talk) 05:41, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:31, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
_%D0%B2_%D0%A2%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%BF%D0%BE%D0%BB%D1%96.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%D0%B2_%D0%A2%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%BF%D0%BE%D0%BB%D1%96.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. The building was built in the 1990s. No Permission from the sculptor / architect. Микола Василечко (talk) 09:26, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:37, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
And also File:Погруддя Данилові Галицькому на території Свято-Троїцького собору в Тернополі.jpg
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. Created after 2020. Derivatives of work. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 09:27, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 12:09, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
And also
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. The building was built after 1990. No Permission from the sculptor / architect. Микола Василечко (talk) 09:28, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 12:10, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. The building was built after 2010. No Permission from the sculptor / architect Данило Чепіль. Микола Василечко (talk) 09:34, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 12:17, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
DW. No FOP in Cambodia. BrightRaven (talk) 09:35, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 12:20, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
File:Захар Беркут. Скульптор Володимир Лупійчук. Різьба по дереву. Колекція Збаразького замку.jpg
[edit]
And also
- File:Леся Українка. Скульптор Володимир Лупійчук. Різьба по дереву. Колекція Збаразького замку.jpg
- File:Кармелюк (Помста). Скульптор Володимир Лупійчук. Різьба по дереву. З колекції Збаразького замку.jpg
._%D0%A1%D0%BA%D1%83%D0%BB%D1%8C%D0%BF%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%80_%D0%92%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%B4%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B8%D1%80_%D0%9B%D1%83%D0%BF%D1%96%D0%B9%D1%87%D1%83%D0%BA._%D0%A0%D1%96%D0%B7%D1%8C%D0%B1%D0%B0_%D0%BF%D0%BE_%D0%B4%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%B2%D1%83._%D0%97_%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%BA%D1%86%D1%96%D1%97_%D0%97%D0%B1%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B7%D1%8C%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BE_%D0%B7%D0%B0%D0%BC%D0%BA%D1%83.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. Created after 1990. Derivatives of work. No Permission from the sculptor Володимир Лупійчук. Микола Василечко (talk) 09:40, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 12:23, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. The building was built after 1990. No Permission from the sculptor / architect. Микола Василечко (talk) 11:51, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 12:27, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. Created after 1990. Derivatives of work. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 11:53, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 12:30, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. The building was built after 1990. No Permission from the sculptor / architect. Микола Василечко (talk) 11:53, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 12:32, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
File:Церква Святого Володимира Великого у селі Ліски Збаразького району Тернопільської області.jpg
[edit]
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. The building was built in the 1992. No Permission from the sculptor / architect. Микола Василечко (talk) 12:54, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 12:33, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. Created after 1990. Derivatives of work. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 17:32, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 12:36, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. Created after 2010. Derivatives of work. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 17:37, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:58, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
File:Меморіальна дошка А. Шептицькому на фасді будинку Тернопільської української гімназії ім. І. Франка.jpg
[edit]
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. Created after 2015. Derivatives of work. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 17:38, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 14:06, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
And also
- File:Погруддя М. Карпенку на Алеї Слави в Старому парку Тернопіля.jpg
- File:Погруддя О. Максименку на Алеї Слави в Старому парку Тернопіля.jpg
- File:Погруддя М. Пігорєву на Алеї Слави в Старому парку Тернопіля.jpg
- File:Погруддя Г. Танцорову на Алеї Слави в Старому парку Тернопіля.jpg
- File:Погруддя В. Чалдаєву на Алеї Слави в Старому парку Тернопіля.jpg
.JPG){kind=link}
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. Created 1984. Derivatives of work. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 17:52, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 14:08, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. Created after 1990. Derivatives of work. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 18:00, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 14:12, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. Created after 1990. Derivatives of work. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 18:00, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 14:17, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
wolno%C5%9B%C4%87_form.jpg){kind=link}
wolno%C5%9B%C4%87_form.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope Lotje (talk) 16:22, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
wolność_form.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep As for Commons:Deletion requests/File:W ramach.jpg Andy Dingley (talk) 16:31, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
- That makes sense of course, in that case it might be categorized in Category:Collage images for GLAM competition in 2021? thanks. Lotje (talk) 15:57, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 09:32, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
wolność_form.jpg){kind=link}
Out of scope Lotje (talk) 16:22, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
- See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:(do)wolność form.jpg Andy Dingley (talk) 16:31, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
- Keep We're not such Philistines that we don't have space for a collage.
- Especially not when these were produced specifically for a wiki-hosted event: Category:Collage images for GLAM competition in 2020 Andy Dingley (talk) 16:30, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
wolno%C5%9B%C4%87_form.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 09:32, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
wrong picture Lepuss (talk) 18:06, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
- The nominator has removed lots of information from the file information page and overwritten the file with an empty file. It's possible that this should be reverted. --Stefan2 (talk) 10:34, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
- Fixed. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:15, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Lepuss: What is wrong? —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:16, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- How can it be verified that the photographer died more than 70 years ago, as stated on the file information page? According to es:Anexo:Congresistas del departamento de Lambayeque#Anexo:Congresistas del departamento de Lambayeque, the subject was alive in the 20th century. This page suggests that he was born in 1867 and died in 1936. Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Peru states that the usual copyright term is life+70 years, but for some old photographs this was shortened to 15 or 20 years from publication. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:36, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Seems OK. --Yann (talk) 09:37, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
wrong picture / copyright Kingred (talk) 18:19, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
- Claimed to be taken from http://muchiks.blogspot.com/2008/07/la-montonera-de-don-teodoro-seminario.html . --Túrelio (talk) 21:08, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
- Comment seems likely to be public domain per Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Peru. If the description or title is inaccurate, those can be changed, not a deletion issue. What is the problem? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:02, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 09:40, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
copyright Kingred (talk) 18:26, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
- Claimed to be taken from http://arrascolazo.blogspot.com/2009/10/cracks-de-ayer-y-hoy.html . --Túrelio (talk) 21:05, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 09:41, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
copyright Kingred (talk) 18:26, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
- The nominator has removed lots of information from the file information page and overwritten the file with an empty file. It's possible that this should be reverted. --Stefan2 (talk) 10:35, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
- Fixed. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:31, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 09:41, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Neveselbert (mobile) as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: All rights reserved by Fine Gael|source=https://www.flickr.com/photos/fine_gael/24457836831/ King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:19, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Comment Needs evaluation on whether https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/copyright-and-reuse/ (CC-BY 4.0) applies. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:19, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
- @King of Hearts: I emailed them and they told me they were not in a position to licence the image. ᴀlbanɢeller (talk) 16:45, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and discussion. --Ellywa (talk) 09:30, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by 139.59.43.62 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: no Fop in Italy
FoP cases are always discussed and not tagged as under criteria for speedy deletion. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 00:43, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
- Comment according to available information at w:Torre Solaria, the building was completed in 2014 and designed by Arquitectonica. The uploader made a comment relating to the speedy tag at COM:UNDEL: "There is a 2015 amateur Wikipedia photo of the twin building (Torre Solea), and no copyright infringement. The building is part of a public square: according to this reasoning then we should wait to take photos in Italy for 70 years? The whole area of Gae Aulenti in Milan is public and recently built, there can be no opposition to the FOP." JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 00:48, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. According to COM:FOP Italy it is not allowed to publish photos of copyrighted buildings. The only exeption is buildings "that are not creative or artistic enough to be copyright-protected". Imho this building does show the creative act of the architecture, so a picture of the building cannot be published on Commons with the CC-BY-SA licence or similar licencing. --Ellywa (talk) 17:55, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope - I don't really see how Wikipedia redirects to an article in the form of a graph can be helpful to anyone in or outside of Wikipedia? –Davey2010Talk 11:59, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
- Keep This can be used in this article. I uploaded it so I can update the 2015 file to 2021. I don't see why this is not in scope. --Contributers2020Talk to me here 13:29, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
- The 2015 image doesn't need to be replaced and IMHO that image is better than the one you've created. I would suggest going to the EN articles talkpage and asking what others there think. –Davey2010Talk 13:37, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
- @Davey2010: I don't think there's a problem with a another file existing in Commons, when it is updated and much more clear than the picture of 2015. --Contributers2020Talk to me here 13:41, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
- Having looked at both images I have just noticed that yours I believe is incorrect as one thing's not leading to another - It's just random words going from one word to another. Anyway IMHO the file is still out of scope here. –Davey2010Talk 13:52, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
- The 2015 image doesn't need to be replaced and IMHO that image is better than the one you've created. I would suggest going to the EN articles talkpage and asking what others there think. –Davey2010Talk 13:37, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The image is not in use on the projects since August 2021, so I think it has no educational value and is out of scope per COM:SCOPE. --Ellywa (talk) 17:57, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
Per description this is not own work. Author's copyright is likely violated. Taivo (talk) 12:08, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Possibly old enough, but the uploader did not mention a source mentioned. --Ellywa (talk) 18:06, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/https://www.parlam.kz/
[edit]Before I nominate all 230 images uploaded from here, I would like someone to prove me wrong. I cannot find CC-BY on the links provided. The website says © 2021 Mazhilis of the Parliament of the Republic of Kazakhstan
All rights reserved.
Any use of materials is allowed if there is a link to the official website of the Mazhilis of the Parliament of the Republic of Kazakhstan.
Please provide a link to the CC or we cannot keep
- File:Нурлан Нигматулин интервью Хабар 19.01.2020.jpg
- File:Нурлан Нигматулин принял Чрезвычайного и Полномочного Посла Японии в Казахстане Тацухико Касаи. 5 апреля 2021 года.jpg
- File:Спикер Мажилиса Нурлан Нигматулин и Председатель Национального Собрания Нгуен Тхи Ким Нган. 14.11.2019.jpg
- File:Nurlan Nigmatulin 014.jpg
- File:Nurlan Nigmatulin 012.jpg
- File:Gulmira Isimbaeva (29369).jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
Gbawden (talk) 13:10, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - The 2016 archive version does state
- "Any use of materials is allowed if there is a link to the official website of the Mazhilis of the Parliament of the Republic of Kazakhstan."
- however technically speaking they're not saying which CC licence they're releasing these under and also directly above this paragraph they also state
- "© 2016 Mazhilis of the Parliament of the Republic of Kazakhstan, All rights reserved."
- which is obviously contradictory ....
- So without them specifically saying which licence they're releasing these under the aforementioned statement holds no weight.
- Also worth noting the aforementioned paragraph no longer exists from 2018 onwards. So I would say these weren't actually released under a CC licence and therefore shouldn't of been uploaded here. That's my 2p anyway, –Davey2010Talk 13:22, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
- Keep: Where? If you just scroll to the bottom it clearly says: © 2021 Parliament of the Republic of Kazakhstan All content of the site is available under license: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International.
- ShadZ01 Apologies I forgot to view the live site - The bottom states "© 2021 Parliament of the Republic of Kazakhstan All content of the site is available under license: ." - Again no CC licence is specified ..... so I don't know where you're getting the CC bit from?. –Davey2010Talk 18:20, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
- Yes, because that site is mostly like homepage that hyperlinks to two different sites of houses of Parliament. Those images were uploaded from the lower house Mazhilis website which show the CC trademark. ShadZ01 (talk) 06:07, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
- Oh so it does, File:Gulmira Isimbaeva (29369).jpg is the only image linked from Mazhilis - The rest are linked from the non-cc part of the website.
- Given no other parts of the website state any CC licence IMHO we should err on the side of caution and delete. Maybe I'm reading it wrong but it reads like only one part of their website is CC-licenced whilst the rest isn't if that makes sense.... I still say we should err on the side of caution here. –Davey2010Talk 11:10, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
- Yes, because that site is mostly like homepage that hyperlinks to two different sites of houses of Parliament. Those images were uploaded from the lower house Mazhilis website which show the CC trademark. ShadZ01 (talk) 06:07, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
- ShadZ01 Apologies I forgot to view the live site - The bottom states "© 2021 Parliament of the Republic of Kazakhstan All content of the site is available under license: ." - Again no CC licence is specified ..... so I don't know where you're getting the CC bit from?. –Davey2010Talk 18:20, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
My interpretation today:
File:Нурлан Нигматулин интервью Хабар 19.01.2020.jpg- Per https://www.parlam.kz/ru/blogs/nigmatulinn/Foto-Gallery/8/?id=10 shows CC0 1.0 licence- File:Нурлан Нигматулин принял Чрезвычайного и Полномочного Посла Японии в Казахстане Тацухико Касаи. 5 апреля 2021 года.jpg - source page does not show a free licence. https://www.parlam.kz/ru/blogs/NigmatulinN/Foto-Gallery/3/?id=8
- File:Спикер Мажилиса Нурлан Нигматулин и Председатель Национального Собрания Нгуен Тхи Ким Нган. 14.11.2019.jpg - No free licence on the source page, https://www.parlam.kz/ru/blogs/nigmatulinn/Foto-Gallery/6/?id=3
File:Nurlan Nigmatulin 014.jpg- Source page is showing CC0 1.0 https://www.parlam.kz/ru/blogs/NigmatulinN/Foto-Gallery/9/?id=3File:Nurlan Nigmatulin 012.jpg- Source page is showing CC0 1.0 https://www.parlam.kz/ru/blogs/NigmatulinN/Foto-Gallery/9/?id=2.File:Gulmira Isimbaeva (29369).jpg- Source page mentiones CC-BY-SA4.0 licence. https://www.parlam.kz/ru/mazhilis/news-details/id47684/1/1
Ellywa (talk) 18:34, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Four image could be kept with a free licence, two have to be deleted. Please check carefully before nominating more images of this source. --Ellywa (talk) 18:35, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
Does Commons:Freedom of panorama in source country allow this? EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept: assuming this is artistic craftmenship, displayed in public premises (a church), and in ireland, per COM:FOP Ireland the image can be kept. --Ellywa (talk) 18:39, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 139.59.43.62 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: no Fop in Italy
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion. Not sure whether this construction scene is above COM:TOO. -- Túrelio (talk) 14:40, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: imho this building is sufficiently to completed to show the creativity of the architect. So it is therefore deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 19:47, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 139.59.43.62 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: no Fop in Italy
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, which should include all similar images in Category:Torri Garibaldi. -- Túrelio (talk) 14:43, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and COM:FOP Italy, @Turelio: , please nominate the other image in the category to allow for discussion. On basis of this DR, these cannot be deleted I think. --Ellywa (talk) 19:54, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
wrong picture Kingred (talk) 18:16, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
- What exactly is wrong? —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:14, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellywa (talk) 19:54, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
wrong picture / copyright Kingred (talk) 18:20, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
- Claimed to be taken from https://rpp.pe/noticias/aurich-vs-alianza-lima . --Túrelio (talk) 21:07, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 19:55, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
,_p81.jpg){kind=link}
Prev nom crashed Needs a proper source/license to keep - current source is a doc from google Gbawden (talk) 13:42, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
,_p81.jpg){kind=link}
@Gbawden: I has been edit for licence and source, and i will edited for all pict for proof-reading Kami Perkenalkan (1954) on wikisource Pungkas nurrohman (talk) 01:51, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
,_p81.jpg){kind=link}
- File:BESAR MARTOKOESOEMO.jpg
- File:HARJOTO, R.M.jpg
- File:SUMARNO.jpg
- File:SOETOTO.jpg
- File:GUNUNG ISKANDAR.jpg
- File:Mr.Iman SUDJAHRI.jpg
- File:Ir.Martinus PUTUHENA.jpg
- File:Mr.Iman SOEPOMO.jpg
- File:Moh. R. KAFRAWI.jpg
- File:M.HUTASOIT.jpg
- File:Dr.M.SOERONO.jpg
- File:Mr.SUMARDI.jpg
- File:Prof. Mr. Dr. Raden SOEPOMO.jpg
- File:Prof. Dr.M. SARDJITO.jpg
- File:Laksamana Muda Udara, Raden Suryadi SURYADARMA.jpg
- File:Kolonel Maludin SIMBOLON.jpg
- File:Kolonel Bambang Utoyo.jpg
- File:Raden SUWIRJO.jpg
- File:Mr. A. Karim.jpg
- File:Djenderal Major Tahi Bonar Simatupang.jpg
- File:Laksmana Muda Laut, Raden SUBIAKTO.jpg
- File:Djendral Major Bambang Sugeng.jpg
- File:Kolonel Alex Evert Kawilarang.jpg
- File:Letkol Sudirman.jpg
- File:Letkol Mohamad Bachrun.jpg
- File:Kolonel SADIKIN.jpg
- File:Letkol F.J. WARROUW.jpg
- File:RUSLAN MULJOHARDJO.jpg
- File:Mr. Soetan Muhammad AMIN.jpg
- File:Dr. Mohamad ISA.jpg
- File:SAMADIKUN.jpg
- File:Rd. Sanoesi HARDJADINATA.jpg
- File:Raden BOEDIONO.jpg
- File:Raden SaidSOEKANTO TJOKRODIATMODJO.jpg
- File:Mr. TAMZIL.jpg
- File:Mr. R. SOEDJONO.jpg
- File:MUKARTO NOTOWIDIGDO.jpg
- File:Prof. Mr. Dr. Raden Soepomo.jpg
- File:Mr. A.A. Maramis.jpg
- File:Machmud L. Latjuba.jpg
- File:Mr. Usman Sastroamijoyo.jpg
- File:Lambertus Nicodemus Palar.jpg
- File:Mr. Sutan Mohamad Rasyid.jpg
- File:Mr. Sudjarwo Tjondronegoro.jpg
- File:Mr. Susanto Tirtoprodjo.jpg
- File:MayJend. Abdulkadir.jpg
- File:Arnold MONONUTU.jpg
- File:ANAK AGUNG GDE AGUNG.jpg
- File:Mr.Raden Tirtawinata.jpg
- File:ARSO SASROATMODJO.jpg
- File:M. Ardiwinangun.jpg
- File:ASRARUDIN.jpg
- File:Amri Yara.jpg
- File:Andi Gappa.jpg
- File:Amelz.jpg
- File:Kiyai Hadji Ahmad AZHARI,.jpg
- File:R. H. Moehamad Adnan.jpg
- File:AHEM ERNINGPRADJA.jpg
- File:Aidit, Dipa Nusantara.jpg
- File:Aboebakar Ariadiningrat, R., Kami Perkenalkan (1954), p81.jpg
- File:Abdulhajat, Kami Perkenalkan (1954), p81.jpg
- File:Aboe Bakar, Kami Perkenalkan (1954), p81.jpg
,_p81.jpg){kind=link}
,_p81.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: All these portraits are taken from the book Kami Perkenalkan, published by the Kementerian Penerangan in 1954 where {{PD-IDGov}} applies. This includes also the portraits (see (c) in the quoted text of the license). --AFBorchert (talk) 07:57, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
,_p81.jpg){kind=link}
Added to the list and kept (was omitted in this DR). Ellywa (talk) 21:39, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
,_p81.jpg){kind=link}
