Jump to content

Wikifunctions:Requests for user groups

From Wikifunctions
(Redirected from Wikifunctions:RFUG)
Shortcuts:
WF:RFG,
WF:PERM,
WF:RFUG

This is the place to request specific user groups:

Archived requests can be found at Wikifunctions:Requests for user groups/Archive
SpBot archives all sections tagged with {{Section resolved|1=~~~~}} after 1 day.

Confirmed

Functioneer

Feeglgeef

Feeglgeef (talk · contributions · deleted user contributions · Statistics · block log · User rights log · Global account information)
Discussion open until: 21:31, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
I've created a few functions and implementations/test cases for existing functions. It would be nice to be able to add them myself. I understand how Wikifunctions works, am proficient with Javascript, and have intermediate-advanced knowledge of Python. Feeglgeef (talk) 21:31, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Maintainer

This role is not yet available.

Autopatroller

Administrator

Interface administrator

Translation administrator

Bureaucrat

Miscellaneous requests

DannyS712 bot

I want to get approval for a bot with translation admin rights that will automatically mark pages for translations if and only if the latest version is identical to the version that is already in the translation system, i.e. only pages with no "net" changes in the pending edits. I am filing almost identical requests for bot approval on a bunch of wikis, and figured I should put some of the details in a central location. Please see meta:User:DannyS712/TranslationBot for further info. --DannyS712 (talk) 12:44, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Could you performe some tests (with your regular account)? --Ameisenigel (talk) 14:30, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Ameisenigel I'd prefer to avoid added bot passwords to my personal account - would you be willing to accept the trial on Wikidata, where the bot account has been granted translation admin rights (once I actually do the trial) as a working demonstration, given that the code is going to essentially be identical? --DannyS712 (talk) 17:17, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, that would work as well. --Ameisenigel (talk) 17:38, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See also