User:Doug Weller
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| IP Rangeblock Calculator | IP Range Edit Check | Checkusers | Oversighters |
User:Blablubbs/How to file a good SPI
| Main namespace | |
|---|---|
| Other namespaces | |
| All namespaces | |
| Navboxes with templates |
|
| Inline images | |
| Help pages | |
| Related topics | |
| Search | |
| Immediate requests | Entries |
|---|---|
| Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages | 0 |
| Wikipedians looking for help | 0 |
| Requests for unblock | 34 |
| Wikipedia semi-protected edit requests | 26 |
| Wikipedia extended-confirmed-protected edit requests | 49 |
| Wikipedia template-protected edit requests | 13 |
| Wikipedia fully protected edit requests | 2 |
| Wikipedia conflict of interest edit requests | 65 |
| Requested RD1 redactions | 4 |
| Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations | 2 |
| Candidates for speedy deletion | 15 |
| Open sockpuppet investigations | 39 |
| Click here to locate other admin backlogs | |
Administrative backlog
Reports
- 200.118.146.92 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 957 five times in the last 5 minutes (Removal of article lead, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 19:30, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Some copyright issues which have been addressed. But this isn't vandalism. -Ad Orientem (talk) 19:34, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
False positive. Edits are not vandalism. However, there were other edits that added copyrighted material that have been reverted, and the editor has been warned. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 19:35, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- 185.214.220.199 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 19:46, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- False positive. Edits are not vandalism. Deleting unsourced content aggressively. Some consider this useful, others misguided, but in any event it's not vandalism. * Pppery * it has begun... 20:08, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- 221.118.145.17 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1319 (LTA 1319, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 22:42, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
User-reported
- 32.221.57.73 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – vandalism after final warning. MrOllie (talk) 20:22, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
This noticeboard is for obvious vandals and spammers only. Consider taking this report to Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:36, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- 67.149.160.101 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On United Wholesale Mortgage (diff): vandalism after final warning. He removed damaging information (lawsuit) about the company at the bottom of the diff. Mamani1990 (talk) 21:35, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- This noticeboard is for obvious vandals and spammers only. Consider taking this report to Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:38, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Scroocat (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – see talkpage LakesideMinersCome Talk To Me! 22:48, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- 45.83.21.25 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – sock of above user LakesideMinersCome Talk To Me! 22:52, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
|
The following articles and files have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Deletion backlog
Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – 4 items Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 23 items Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old needing human review – 92 items Requested RD1 redactions – 4 items
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
User-reported
 | This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. Please replace this notice with {{no admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared. |
Current requests for increase in protection level
Place requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – persistent disruptive editing as experienced in the past. Marincyclist (talk) 04:59, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Per AIV. Daniel Case (talk) 18:54, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: User is repeatedly adding outdated information, misusing sources (such as using a source to cite material it contradicts), and removing cited information from reputable sources. User is showing inherent nationalistic bias. Skeptical1800 (talk) 06:24, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- See the talk page: Talk:Urartu#Recent_changes Bogazicili (talk) 15:51, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: There have been numerous cases of soapboxing and vandalism by IP addresses, many of which have no edit history other than warring on this article, and at least one single-purpose user account - this has occurred on a monthly basis since last September, when 2 such incidents occurred, in addition to last May, several times in 2023 and a significant edit war in June 2022. Due to the relatively niche nature of the article's subject, I would suggest WP:PCPP or WP:SEMI at most, so as not to exclude too many editors from participating. UltrasonicMadness (talk) 12:39, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Constant exhausting disruption for years now. Semsûrî (talk) 13:11, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP editors. Since the new year, there have been 17 edits (10 by IPs and 7 by registered editors). Of these, 7 are egregious IP vandalism; 2 are IPs reverting IP vandalism; 1 is a marginally constructive IP edit (a wikilink); 5 are registered editors undoing IP vandalism; 1 is a registered editor undoing a good-faith mistake by an IP editor; and 1 is a registered editor fixing a small grammar mistake. Thus, in the past 12 days, 82% of edits solely exist as or because of IP vandalism. It's obvious this will continue to be a contentious subject. TheTechnician27 (Talk page) 14:58, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Controversial athlete, sees a lot of IP vandalism. Nswix (talk) 16:07, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Various IPs continually changing the cast list to their preferred version. Skywatcher68 (talk) 17:10, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Vandalism by new user 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk • contribs) 18:34, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP users and other registered editors
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 18:59, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Latest sock of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jeremiah Caquias/Archive gaming autoconfirm. Wikishovel (talk) 19:00, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – For the second time in a few days can we lock this up so people know what to do with the shock puppet edits. Moxy🍁 19:43, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳🌈 19:46, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended protection: WP:GS/RUSUKR, IP's attempting to introduce incorrect losses of the vehicle. TylerBurden (talk) 20:29, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. EndzoneEnthusiast 20:49, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – We think someone/somewhere a joke is being pulled on the project. see Wikipedia talk:Meetup/Toronto/Wikipedia Day 2025Moxy🍁 21:34, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:Articles for Deletion/Congestion pricing In New York City (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Create protection: Repeatedly recreated – created by a LTA who also repeatedly created the similar now salted page Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Congestion pricing in New York City. Isla🏳️⚧ 21:35, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. M.Bitton (talk) 21:53, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – multiple IPs. Geraldo Perez (talk) 21:59, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Increasing amounts of IP vandalism MrEarlGray (talk) 22:14, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Continuous style-warring and attempts to remove the most-common definition of the Droop quota by an unregistered editor. (Who has kept this up from many different IPs.) IP has repeatedly ignored attempts at explaining this on both the article talk and in a conversation I had with them on my user talk. (The Droop quota is sometimes defined v⁄k+1 and sometimes v+1⁄k+1; user keeps deleting latter definition.). – Closed Limelike Curves (talk) 22:40, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Indefinite pending changes protection: Can be reduced to indefinite pending changes protection, as i believe its unnecesarry so that we can give non-vandalising ip users a chance 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk • contribs) 10:32, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Handled requests
A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
| 2 protected edit requests | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 22:20, 12 January 2025 (UTC) |
| 14 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 22:42, 12 January 2025 (UTC) |
WP:PERM
| Requests for autopatrolled |
|---|
Autopatrolled
Reason for requesting autopatrolled rights Hi, I would like to request this right because I have met the criteria for 25 articles that are free of problems. I would like to use it for my interest in WikiProject Korea. You can see all of articles i've created here! :) Aidillia(talk) 07:08, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
Cmacauley has been an editor since 2007, meets all the required criteria, and would likely benefit from having the AP right granted. This editor currently has 59 live articles and has only had one article deleted. They have consistently produced well-referenced, high-quality articles, with the majority receiving B-class ratings. Wikipedialuva (talk) 05:07, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
I've been around for some time, am quite familiar with tough conversations at the Teahouse or IRC (though I've sadly been inactive at the latter for a while) with new editors excitedly pushing their (often promotional) new articles, and do occasionally write new articles, 53 so far. I might as well not clutter the new pages queue. — Anon423 (talk) 01:51, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
Has created 166 articles, with all of them created over the last year or so are still live. As part of NPP, I reviewed Titus Joseph Mdoe and found that SiniyaEdita had created the page without the intervention from others, and I didn't think that it needed further improvement. Other articles they created are of a similar standard. Klbrain (talk) 17:03, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
I've seen this editor's work on multiple occasions at New Page Review. Has created 208 pages, none deleted, more than 3/4 of them B-class. High-quality page creation with infoboxes, quality references with proper formatting, images, etc., requiring no cleanup by reviewers. Dclemens1971 (talk) 17:38, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
I would like to request auto-patrolled rights on Wikipedia. I have been actively contributing to the project and have created more than 30 of articles to date, which adhere to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. I believe my experience and attention to detail make me a good fit for this role. Granting me auto-patrolled rights would help reduce the workload on other patrollers by automatically marking my new pages as reviewed. Please feel free to review my contributions and articles to ensure they meet the necessary standards. Let me know if any additional information is required. Thank you for considering my request! Needforname (talk) 17:39, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason for requesting autopatrolled rights Ahola .O (talk) 22:56, 11 January 2025 (UTC) I am requesting the autopatrolled user right because I have been actively contributing to Wikipedia and believe that my experience and adherence to Wikipedia's guidelines make me a suitable candidate for this right, I have created over 25 articles, all of which comply with Wikipedia's notability guidelines and content policies. My contributions have consistently aimed to enhance the quality and reliability of the encyclopedia. I believe that granting me the autopatrolled user right will help reduce the workload of new page patrollers and allow me to continue contributing to Wikipedia more efficiently. Thank you for considering my request. Ahola .O (talk)
Reason for requesting autopatrolled rights I have created almost 50 articles and whilst producing these articles I have developed my understanding of wikipedia policies, conformed with the rules for biographies of living persons and have improved the content and formatting of numerous articles. SDGB1217 (talk) 14:46, 12 January 2025 (UTC) |
| Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access |
|---|
AutoWikiBrowser
Reason for requesting autowikibrowser rights: copyediting, particularly regarding MOS:NUM guidelines. ArkHyena (it/its) 20:41, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason for requesting autowikibrowser rights: mostly editing redirects so that they are tagged with the correct rcats harrz talk 15:58, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for confirmation |
|---|
Confirmed
Reason for requesting confirmed rights Unblock-un on hold (talk) 20:08, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for extended confirmation |
|---|
Extended confirmed
Reason for Request: I am requesting reinstatement of Extended Confirmed Rights after their removal by User:ScottishFinnishRadish for concerns related to "gaming EC through adding a machine translation of Fondation Maeght and Rueil-Malmaison in many small edits without attribution." He asked me to "make at least a few hundred edits" to regain it. Since the removal, I have added attribution to the concerned articles. I have made over 600 referenced contributions, focusing on adding reliable sources to improve verifiability, expanding content in alignment with Wikipedia’s standards, and enhancing article quality. I believe my recent contributions demonstrate constructive and policy-compliant editing. Examples of Recent Contributions: Foucault pendulum, Water metering, Smart meter, and Gas meter. My recent edits also contributed significantly to upgrading the article History of the Jews in Tunisia from "Start-Class" to "B-Class." Michael Boutboul (talk) 12:28, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
 Not done - This request has been unanswered for nearly a month. I think that is because you have asked three admins (Star Mississippi here, and Drmies and ScottishFinnishRadish at your talk page) to justify concerns which they have already described clearly and repeatedly. That is placing an onus on them to prove you untrustworthy. This is not how permissions requests work. Two significant concerns have been raised already: (1.) you have added translated content from other Wikipedias without attribution and (2.) you have artificially split your article contributions into separate edits to more quickly reach a high edit count, e.g. 127 edits to Water metering. I have to say that at water metering alone, while your changes were significant, they don't justify that number of edits. That together with the timing of your request makes it reasonably likely that you made those 127 edits to attain the target set for you (to make a "few hundred" more edits) when the permission was removed. In those circumstances, the concerns raised are unaddressed. I would not be comfortable granting you the permission. Permissions are revoked due to lack of trust and there is no automatic right to regain it. If you wish to gain this permission again, the onus would be on you to prove that trust has been regained. arcticocean ■ 21:57, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
@OhNoItsJamie removed my access to EC because i made a quite a few test edits and said if i made 100 constructive edits, i would gain it back, and so im asking for it, if not its fine i guess
Reason for requesting extended confirmed rights Hello! A few weeks ago my extended-confirmed protection was removed for breaking WP:PGAME, I sincerely apologize for this, I was impatient and I had no knowledge of the rules existence at the time. Out of the 600 edits I’ve done so far, only ~50-80 of them are dummy edits, which I’ve done on my sandbox. Zabezt (talk) 02:39, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
BusterD said that I could get AC if I make at least 250 more constructive edits and that means a total of 750 edits. I have done more than that and I have intentions of constructively contributing to Wikipedia if I get extended confirmed access. Contact BusterD for more info 54rt678 (talk) 20:40, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
|
| There are no outstanding requests for the file mover flag. |
|---|
File mover |
| Requests for new page reviewer |
|---|
New page reviewer
I am primarily a content creator, i.e. I create articles. Thus my contribution to new page reviewer duties is only occasional, but it is almost always done at length and at depth, so that WP does benefit from my NPR contributions, however rare they may be. My total record under the official unbrella of new page reviewer has been as follows: 2023: St Luke's Hospital, Rugby, Laverstock ware, Theodorus (archbishop of Ravenna), Brasidas lacerta, Euan Duthie, Lord Duthie. 2024: Pilgrims' Cross, Holcombe Moor, Ruth Shevelen, Saint James the Less, Pockthorpe, Happy the Hoglet, Labour for the Common Good, Yasmin Al-Khudhairi, Tongerlongeter, Arctic Ascent with Alex Honnold. Now, as I understand it, permissions are automatically revoked after 12 months of official inactivity under that umbrella. But my permissions were revoked in June 2024, which does not chime with my 2024 new page reviewer record. So something wrong there. During the latter part of 2024 and at the beginning of this year, I made several attempts to fulfil some new page reviewer tasks, but the tools were no longer there from the middle of 2024, and it has taken me some time to find out what was causing that problem. Now, please would you kindly reinstate my new page reviewer rights, and maybe add some note to my name saying that my contributions are not massive, but they are useful. Thank you. Storye book (talk) 20:07, 9 January 2025 (UTC) Storye book (talk) 20:07, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for page mover |
|---|
Page mover
Have participated in handful of RMs in past year, as well as at MRV. I've only come to RMTR once, but otherwise would be useful for disambiguation purposes. As I often create the disambig first, in order to justify a page moving away from ptopic; this often leaves me with having to swap the disambig page with the redirect and visa versa afterwards, when I simply need to perform a swap. I've otherwise closed RMs before, and would probably close more that aren't too controversial, but am often restricted due to the need to overwrite a redirect. CNC (talk) 12:54, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for pending changes reviewer | ||
|---|---|---|
Pending changes reviewer
As I also do recent changes patrolling, having this permission will extemeley help me with combatting vandals, as edits requesting review can be viewed on the Recent Changes page, which will help me.
Note: The bot becoming silly, and marking as already done. Hello I'm Ampil. The right set to expire 12 days. I've received a award. and I'm a AfC reviewer. ~🌀 Ampil 「💬 / 📝」 04:39, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
I've been editing for a few years now and I have a good enough grasp on Wikipedia's policies to warrant this permission. I want to be able to keep protected pages maintained and updated. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 20:07, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
I have lots of experience in the WP:TW scale of reverting edits, and wish to continue this through WP:PENDING BryceM2001 (talk) 20:40, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
I'd like to request pending changes reviewer so I can review pending changes, as it'd help alongside doing vandalism patrol. SmittenGalaxy | talk! 08:52, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
I'd like to request pending changes review rights because I am familiar with the policy and this would help me with my vandalism patrols. Furthermore, I am currently trying to accept a request, but I do not have the permissions. Thanks! Ali Beary (talk2me!) (stalk me?!) 13:29, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I've been active in the Wikipedia community adding new content and creating articles, but especially fighting vandalism. I have also gained experience in reviewing by looking and reviewing semi-protected and protected pages edit requests. I am now looking for a new challenge, and I think I could help by putting forth my skills for the pending changes reviewer role! Thanks for the consideration.TYPEINFO (talk) 06:36, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
My sole purpose of editing or the desire to review edits is for the wellbeing of Wikipedia. I made a few pages and made 1300+ edits. I believe in quality not quantity. TrueMoriarty (talk) 17:36, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for rollback |
|---|
Rollback
I have been patrolling the recent changes page for a long time now, and it's pretty much the only thing I do on here (other then occasional copyediting.) When I learned about rollback and its benefits, I thought that could be a huge help for me and patrolling against vandalism. I love patrolling, and this will make my life so much easier. Thanks, Tenebre_Rosso_Sangue, Editing with SSStyle! Call for Medic! My Stats! 20:38, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason for requesting rollback rights Hello! I routinely go to the Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection when I spot vandalism. I believe this would make the process of resolving issues faster. If you need links to my requests, I can provide them! If there is more things I could do, please tell me. NotQualified (talk) 22:49, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
|
| There are no outstanding requests for template editor. |
|---|
Template editor |
.
Template:Centralized discussion – Current discussions
|
|
- User:Uncle G/On common Google Books mistakes
- Newbie edits to templates
- Tagged speedy removed
- Tagged possible BLP issues
- Tagged article blanking
- Tagged shouting
- Tagged nonsense characters
- Tagged repeating characters
- Tagged possible vandalism
- Tagged possible userpage spam
- Tagged possible link spam #1
- Tagged possible link spam #2
|
Barnstars
|
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar | |
| For adhereing to Wikipedia policies, professionalism, providing answers when needed, and for your help even though we do not agree on every detail. Thank you! Dr. Persi (talk) 05:09, 25 January 2011 (UTC) |
|
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
| for consistently prompt action against miscreants. The Gnome (talk) 11:41, 30 May 2012 (UTC) |
|
The Barnstar of Diligence | |
| I award you this barnstar in recognition of a combination of extraordinary scrutiny, precision and community service for Wikipedia's Caucasus related topics.--Yacatisma (talk) 16:55, 12 June 2014 (UTC) |
- Members of the Fifteen Year Society of Wikipedia editors
- Wikipedia administrators
- Wikipedians in Florida
- Wikipedians in Miami
- Wikipedians in the United Kingdom
- British Wikipedians
- Wikipedia oversighters
- Wikipedians who use Discord
- Wikipedians who have been selected as Editor of the Week
- WikiProject Archaeology participants
- Wikipedia Volunteer Response Team members
- Wikipedians by alma mater: Yale University
- Wikipedia administrators willing to handle RevisionDelete requests
- Wikipedians with MS degrees
- Wikipedians who have access to Project MUSE
- Members of the Ten Year Society of Wikipedia editors
- Wikipedians by alma mater: London School of Economics