Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2023/04/09
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
![5 File:"Primordial" by Núria Farré Abejón.png](#File:"Primordial"_by_Núria_Farré_Abejón.png){kind=link}
![7 File:"La mare" from Núria Farré Abejón.png](#File:"La_mare"_from_Núria_Farré_Abejón.png){kind=link}
![8 File:"Balance" from Núria Farré Abejón.png](#File:"Balance"_from_Núria_Farré_Abejón.png){kind=link}
![10 File:"He aprés a ser una dona" by Núria Farré Abejón.png](#File:"He_aprés_a_ser_una_dona"_by_Núria_Farré_Abejón.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_transits_the_North_Atlantic_Ocean_in_support_of_exercise_Northern_Viking_2022.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
I can't find the source of this image, but since at least 5 other files of this uploader are clear copyright violations (one, two, three, four. five), I suspect this file is copyvio as well. Facenapalm (talk) 03:11, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
- source, "ESL - All rights reserved" DazzzG (talk) 04:28, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation, no indication of a free license on the source site. --Wutsje 05:30, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded by mistake. DennisBoolyoins (talk) 03:28, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:CSD#G7. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:47, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded by mistake. I had no intention to publish this pic. DennisBoolyoins (talk) 03:29, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:CSD#G7. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:47, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Wrong licence Suyaybidaia (talk) 09:57, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 10:40, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Wrong licence Suyaybidaia (talk) 09:58, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
![09:58, 9 April 2023 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2023/04/09#c-Suyaybidaia-20230409095800-File:"Primordial"_by_Núria_Farré_Abejón.png){kind=link}
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 10:32, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
![10:32, 9 April 2023 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2023/04/09#c-Taivo-20230409103200-File:"Primordial"_by_Núria_Farré_Abejón.png){kind=link}
Wrong licence Suyaybidaia (talk) 09:58, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 10:39, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Wrong licence Suyaybidaia (talk) 09:59, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
![09:59, 9 April 2023 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2023/04/09#c-Suyaybidaia-20230409095900-File:"La_mare"_from_Núria_Farré_Abejón.png){kind=link}
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 10:30, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
![10:30, 9 April 2023 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2023/04/09#c-Taivo-20230409103000-File:"La_mare"_from_Núria_Farré_Abejón.png){kind=link}
Wrong licence Suyaybidaia (talk) 10:00, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
![10:00, 9 April 2023 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2023/04/09#c-Suyaybidaia-20230409100000-File:"Balance"_from_Núria_Farré_Abejón.png){kind=link}
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 10:28, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
![10:28, 9 April 2023 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2023/04/09#c-Taivo-20230409102800-File:"Balance"_from_Núria_Farré_Abejón.png){kind=link}
Wrong licence Suyaybidaia (talk) 10:01, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 10:38, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Wrong licence Suyaybidaia (talk) 10:01, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
![10:01, 9 April 2023 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2023/04/09#c-Suyaybidaia-20230409100100-File:"He_aprés_a_ser_una_dona"_by_Núria_Farré_Abejón.png){kind=link}
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 10:29, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
![10:29, 9 April 2023 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2023/04/09#c-Taivo-20230409102900-File:"He_aprés_a_ser_una_dona"_by_Núria_Farré_Abejón.png){kind=link}
Meant to upload this to local Wikimedia for illustration purposes, accidentally uploaded this here. This explained the incorrect copyright tag. RHD-45 (talk) 12:39, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:21, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Facebook 186.175.215.71 16:44, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 20:18, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Self promo or someone famous? 186.175.215.71 16:42, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:24, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Speedy delete F1 186.175.215.71 16:37, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Polarlys. --Rosenzweig τ 21:59, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Unused selfie. Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 09:57, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:11, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
No COM:FOP India for 2D art. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:39, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:11, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
No COM:FOP India for 2D art. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:39, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:11, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
This plate contains artwork that is above the threshold of originality in the United States. While Federal Government works are in the public domain in the United States, the same cannot be generally said for works of U.S. States, and Alabama does not dedicate its works to the public domain, and the license plate appears to have first been published after March 1, 1989. Per COM:HIRTLE, this would make the plate copyrighted in the United States. As we cannot host copyrighted works absent an explicit free license, we likewise cannot host images of this plate on Commons, and this image should be deleted as such. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:54, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:11, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
The plate contains artwork that is above the threshold of originality in the United States. While Federal Government works are in the public domain in the United States, the same cannot be generally said for works of U.S. States; Kentucky does not broadly dedicate its works to the public domain. This license plate bears a creative design that appear to have first been published after March 1, 1989. Per COM:HIRTLE, this would make the plates copyrighted in the United States. As we cannot host copyrighted works absent an explicit free license from the copyright holder, we likewise cannot host an images of this plates on Commons. This file should be deleted as such in light of COM:PRP. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 04:29, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:11, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
out of com:PS Hanooz 14:06, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:12, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
out of com:PS + contains copyrighted photos. Hanooz 14:12, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:12, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
This plate contain artwork that is above the threshold of originality in the United States. While Federal Government works are in the public domain in the United States, the same cannot be generally said for works of U.S. States; New Jersey does not broadly dedicate its works to the public domain. This license plate bears a two-dimensional design that appears to have first been published after March 1, 1989. Per COM:HIRTLE, the design of the plate is therefore presumed copyrighted in the United States. As we cannot host copyrighted works absent an explicit free license, we likewise cannot host images of this plate on Commons. As the image appears to have as its central focus the copyrighted design of the license plate, the copyrighted design is used in a greater-than-de minimis manner. As such, this file should be deleted in light of COM:PRP for lacking evidence of a valid free license for the copyrighted design. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 15:45, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:12, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
No evidence that User:ARKADIUSZ Borzdyński and Michał Heller are the same person; VRT permission needed. Ankry (talk) 16:00, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:12, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
Considering the user's other copyright-violating uploads, this file is also unlikely to be "own work". The file already had an online presence before it was uploaded to Commons and https://www.hadaramagazine.com/?p=5797 attributes it to the Sharjah Government Media Burea, which seems a lot more plausible than "Anonymoususer12390". HyperGaruda (talk) 06:34, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: unlikely to be own work. --Strakhov (talk) 11:48, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
Unlikely to be the uploader's own work. https://gulfnews.com/photos/readers-pictures/reader-photo-essay-places-to-visit-in-khor-fakkan-and-sharjah-to-enjoy-the-pleasant-uae-weather-1.1643891162024 attributes the photo to Hussain Habib, whose permission would be needed for uploading to Commons. HyperGaruda (talk) 06:39, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: unlikely to be own work, COM:VRT permission needed. --Strakhov (talk) 11:49, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
File contains copyrighted logo, was unaware this was not allowed at the time. Maurice Oly (talk) 23:23, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Keep De minimis, I can’t even make out what that logo is. Snowmanonahoe (talk) 23:30, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Agreed. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:00, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
Kept: De minimis. --Strakhov (talk) 12:06, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
File contains possible copyrighted logo, was unaware this was not allowed at the time. Maurice Oly (talk) 23:24, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Below TOO as a very extremely small altercation of a common design representing theater drama/tragedy, and even if that weren’t the case, de minimis. Snowmanonahoe (talk) 23:32, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Agreed. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:00, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Strakhov (talk) 12:06, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
File contains copyrighted logo, was unaware this was not allowed at the time. Maurice Oly (talk) 23:24, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
- Keep de minimis. Snowmanonahoe (talk) 23:40, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Agreed. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:00, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
Kept: De minimis. --Strakhov (talk) 12:07, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
My own work, wrong naming format NightJasian (talk) 00:32, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:G7. czar 17:38, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The uploader is not the author, as statted in the description CoffeeEngineer (talk) 02:02, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. czar 17:39, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
I changed my mind, I don't want it to be publicly visible anymore Coolshaurya (talk) 03:13, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Comment We have a lot of photos of ceiling fans, so a courtesy deletion is OK if the closing admin would like to make one. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:21, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: beyond grace period but can delete as unused and having low COM:EV. czar 17:41, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:License plates of Iowa
[edit]These plates contain artwork that is above the threshold of originality in the United States. While Federal Government works are in the public domain in the United States, the same cannot be generally said for works of U.S. States; Iowa does not broadly dedicate its works to the public domain. All of these license plates bear designs that appear to have first been published after March 1, 1989. Per COM:HIRTLE, this would make the plates copyrighted in the United States. As we cannot host copyrighted works absent an explicit free license, we likewise cannot host images of these plates on Commons. These files should be deleted as such in light of COM:PRP.
- File:Iowa 1992 Sesquicentennial - Scenic.jpg
- File:Iowa 2003 trailer license plate - 4744 KL.jpg
- File:Iowa 2010 467 GYA.jpg
- File:Iowa 2020 plate.jpg
- File:Iowa license.png
— Red-tailed hawk (nest) 04:16, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Per the nominator. It might depend on the state, but I think works by the government of Iowa are copyrighted and in this case the license plates are unique enough to justify deleting the images. --Adamant1 (talk) 21:26, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and COM:PCP. czar 17:47, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
Each of these plates contain artwork that is above the threshold of originality in the United States. While Federal Government works are in the public domain in the United States, the same cannot be generally said for works of U.S. States. Neither Tennessee nor Alabama dedicate their works to the public domain, and all of these plates appear to have first been published after March 1, 1989. Per COM:HIRTLE, this would make the plates copyrighted in the United States; as we cannot host copyrighted works absent an explicit free license, we likewise cannot host these images on Commons, and they should be deleted as such.
- File:TN Union U plate.jpg
- File:TN- UT MARTIN PLATE.jpg
- File:TN Arts Commission Fish plate.jpg
- File:TN Arts Commission- Cool Cat plate.jpg
- File:Alabama 2014 plate.jpg
— Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:48, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:34, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:License plates of Colorado
[edit]These plates contain artwork that is above the threshold of originality in the United States. While Federal Government works are in the public domain in the United States, the same cannot be generally said for works of U.S. States; Colorado does not dedicate its works to the public domain. All of these license plates bear designs that appear to have first been published after March 1, 1989. Per COM:HIRTLE, this would make the plates copyrighted in the United States. As we cannot host copyrighted works absent an explicit free license, we likewise cannot host images of these plates on Commons. For those images that are close-ups of license plates but capture only a bit of the surrounding car, the design of the license plates is the central focus of the photograph and the use of the copyrighted design is greater-than-de minimis. These files should be deleted as such.
- File:2000 Colorado license plate 219-RSX designer.jpg
- File:2003 Colorado truck license plate - 586-EHW.jpg
- File:2008 Colorado license plate - 796-OXV.jpg
- File:2011 Colorado license plate - 944-UXD.jpg
- File:2014 Colorado license plate MOMYSCAR.jpg
- File:2016 Colorado License Plate 435 wide.jpg
- File:2016 Colorado License Plate.jpg
- File:2020 Colorado License Plate.jpg
- File:2020 New Colorado License Plate.jpg
- File:Colorado 2000 Apprortioned Permanent license plate.jpg
- File:Colorado 2000 Fleet license plate - Number 395-QBR.jpg
- File:Colorado 2000 Gross Vehicle Weight Tractor license plate.jpg
- File:Colorado 2000 Gross Vehicle Weight Truck license plate.jpg
- File:Colorado 2006 Apportioned Trailer license plate.jpg
- File:Colorado 2006 Apportioned Truck license plate.jpg
- File:Colorado 2008 Apportioned Tractor license plate.jpg
- File:Colorado license plate Commercial Fleet.jpg
- File:MOMYSCAR Colorado license plate 2014.jpg
- File:Pioneer plate 06-07.jpg
- File:Ypkid 1b (23056292342).jpg
- File:Ypryo 1b (18528991942).jpg
- File:Ypsny 1b (19526689864).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
— Red-tailed hawk (nest) 04:02, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
- Delete It's borderline, but I think these are enough above the threshold of originality to say that it's probably better to delete the images then risk it. --Adamant1 (talk) 21:28, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
- What is the risk here? Do you think that the state of Colorado really cares? If anything this is a benefit to the state of Colorado. If the Sate of Colorado complains, then delete. Otherwise I say leave them there. Shermanator3 (talk) 20:25, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
- See previous discussion for these nominations:
Commons:Deletion requests/Copyrighted U. S. license plates czar 17:49, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ""Wikimedia Commons cares about copyright even when a copyright owner does not" COM:CARES. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:37, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
Unsure of copyright status PlateNerd (talk) 04:09, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:35, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:License plates of Idaho
[edit]These plates contain artwork that is above the threshold of originality in the United States. While Federal Government works are in the public domain in the United States, the same cannot be generally said for works of U.S. States; Idaho does not dedicate its works to the public domain. All of these license plates bear designs that appear to have first been published after March 1, 1989. Per COM:HIRTLE, this would make the plates copyrighted in the United States. As we cannot host copyrighted works absent an explicit free license, we likewise cannot host images of these plates on Commons. These files should be deleted as such.
- File:2000 Idaho License Plate.jpg
- File:2010 Idaho License Plate.jpg
- File:Idaho 2007 License Plate.jpg
- File:Idaho 2024 license plate.jpg
- File:Idaho License Plate.jpg
- File:Yprul 1b (17912699073).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
— Red-tailed hawk (nest) 04:11, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:41, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
Unsure of copyright status PlateNerd (talk) 04:11, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:35, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
Unsure of copyright status PlateNerd (talk) 04:11, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:35, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
Unsure of copyright status PlateNerd (talk) 04:13, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:35, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
Requested deletion PlateNerd (talk) 04:13, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:35, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
Requested deletion PlateNerd (talk) 04:14, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:35, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:License plates of Maine
[edit]These plates contain artwork that is above the threshold of originality in the United States. While Federal Government works are in the public domain in the United States, the same cannot be generally said for works of U.S. States; Maine does not broadly dedicate its works to the public domain. All of these license plates bear designs that appear to have first been published after March 1, 1989. Per COM:HIRTLE, this would make the plates copyrighted in the United States. As we cannot host copyrighted works absent an explicit free license, we likewise cannot host images of these plates on Commons. These files should be deleted as such in light of COM:PRP.
- File:Maine "IEATA55" Plate.png
- File:Maine 2016 License Plate.jpg
- File:Maine Agriculture Plate.jpg
- File:Maine Animal Welfare Vanity.png
- File:Maine Sportsman Plate.png
- File:UMaine plate.png
- File:USA licenseplate Maine (cropped).JPG
- File:USA licenseplate Maine.JPG
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
— Red-tailed hawk (nest) 04:32, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:42, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
These plates contain artwork that is above the threshold of originality in the United States. While Federal Government works are in the public domain in the United States, the same cannot be generally said for works of U.S. States; Maryland does not broadly dedicate its works to the public domain. All of these license plates bear designs that appear to have first been published after March 1, 1989. Per COM:HIRTLE, this would make the plates copyrighted in the United States. As we cannot host copyrighted works absent an explicit free license, we likewise cannot host images of these plates on Commons. These files should be deleted as such in light of COM:PRP.
- File:Maryland 2014 license plate.jpg
- File:Maryland Passenger Sample License Plate 2010.jpg
- File:Maryland Treasure the Chesapeake License Plate seen in Germany.jpg
- File:Maryland Treasure the Chesapeake Sample License Plate Version 1.jpg
- File:Maryland Treasure the Chesapeake Sample License Plate.jpg
— Red-tailed hawk (nest) 04:35, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:42, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:License plates of Michigan
[edit]These plates contain artwork that is above the threshold of originality in the United States. While Federal Government works are in the public domain in the United States, the same cannot be generally said for works of U.S. States; Michigan does not broadly dedicate its works to the public domain. All of these license plates bear designs that appear to have first been published after March 1, 1989. Per COM:HIRTLE, this would make the plates copyrighted in the United States. As we cannot host copyrighted works absent an explicit free license, we likewise cannot host images of these plates on Commons. These files should be deleted as such in light of COM:PRP.
- File:MI bridge plate 2013.jpg
- File:MI Bridge plate 2014-2021.jpg
- File:Michigan 1997 Great Lakes Splendor License Plate.jpg
- File:Michigan 2012 License Plate- 1HA W48.jpg
— Red-tailed hawk (nest) 04:39, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:42, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:License plates of Mississippi
[edit]These plates contain artwork that is above the threshold of originality in the United States. While Federal Government works are in the public domain in the United States, the same cannot be generally said for works of U.S. States; Mississippi does not broadly dedicate its works to the public domain. All of these license plates bear designs that appear to have first been published after March 1, 1989. Per COM:HIRTLE, the plates are therefore presumed copyrighted in the United States. As we cannot host copyrighted works absent an explicit free license, we likewise cannot host images of these plates on Commons. These files should be deleted as such in light of COM:PRP.
- File:2003 Mississippi license plate 015 NF6.jpg
- File:2009 Mississippi license plate LBR 813.jpg
- File:2012 Mississippi license plate RAF 660.jpg
— Red-tailed hawk (nest) 04:43, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:42, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
I want to scrap this and start over, and apparently this seems to be the only possible process for me to be able to do that? MikeK102 (talk) 04:51, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:43, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:ChatGPT.png. 0xDeadbeef (talk) 07:09, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
- Delete: Per old consensus. Not sure what we should replace it with (or if we should just use the logo alone), but that's no good reason to keep it obviously. PopoDameron (talk) 08:46, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:43, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 07:30, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:48, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 07:31, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:48, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 07:35, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:48, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 07:42, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:48, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Kazakhstan A1Cafel (talk) 07:42, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:48, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 07:43, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:48, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 07:44, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:48, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 07:44, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:48, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
Found on Getty Images, permission should be given A1Cafel (talk) 07:48, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:49, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:License plates of Montana
[edit]These plates contain artwork that is above the threshold of originality in the United States. While Federal Government works are in the public domain in the United States, the same cannot be generally said for works of U.S. States; Montana does not broadly dedicate its works to the public domain. All of these license plates bear designs that appear to have first been published after March 1, 1989. Per COM:HIRTLE, the plates are therefore presumed copyrighted in the United States. As we cannot host copyrighted works absent an explicit free license, we likewise cannot host images of these plates on Commons. All photographs appear to have as their central focus the copyrighted license plates, so these are derivative works of a non-free design that use the design in a greater-than-de minimis manner. As such, these files should be deleted in light of COM:PRP for lacking a valid free license for the copyrighted designs.
- File:Montana 03-06.jpg
- File:Montana 06-09 plate.jpg
- File:Montana 2003 license plate.jpg
- File:MONTANA 2004 LICENSE PLATE ^2-A50962 - Flickr - woody1778a.jpg
- File:MONTANA 2005 ^5-A6701 - Flickr - woody1778a.jpg
- File:Montana License Plate Remake (2000-2006 base) NEW FONT.jpg
- File:Montana License Plate Remake (2000-2006 base).jpg
- File:Montana License Plate Remake (2006-2009 base).jpg
- File:Yp57v 1b (18345605838).jpg
_NEW_FONT.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
— Red-tailed hawk (nest) 15:21, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:44, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:License plates of Nevada
[edit]These plates contain artwork that is above the threshold of originality in the United States. While Federal Government works are in the public domain in the United States, the same cannot be generally said for works of U.S. States; Nevada does not broadly dedicate its works to the public domain. All of these license plates bear two-dimensional designs that appear to have first been published after March 1, 1989. Per COM:HIRTLE, the plates are therefore presumed copyrighted in the United States. As we cannot host copyrighted works absent an explicit free license, we likewise cannot host images of these plates on Commons. All images appear to have as their central focus the copyrighted license plates, so they use the design in a greater-than-de minimis manner. As such, these files should be deleted in light of COM:PRP for lacking a valid free license for the copyrighted designs.
- File:2001 Nevada Sample License Plate.jpg
- File:2010 Nevada License Plate.jpg
- File:2016 Nevada license plate (front).jpg
- File:2016 Nevada license plate (rear).jpg
- File:Arts Plate Example.jpg
- File:Cropped NV V&T Plate.jpg
- File:Nevada 2008 License Plate.jpg
- File:Nevada 2009 License Plate.jpg
- File:Nevada GK plate.jpg
- File:NV Plates.jpg
- File:NV SAMPLE Flat License Plates.jpg
- File:NV Sample License Plate.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
— Red-tailed hawk (nest) 15:39, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:45, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
COM:FOP Vietnam was invalid since January 2023, image uploaded afterwards cannot be hosted on Commons A1Cafel (talk) 07:51, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:49, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
Logo above COM:TOO A1Cafel (talk) 08:01, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:50, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:License plates of New Hampshire
[edit]These plates contain artwork that is above the threshold of originality in the United States. While Federal Government works are in the public domain in the United States, the same cannot be generally said for works of U.S. States; New Hampshire does not broadly dedicate its works to the public domain. All of these license plates bear two-dimensional designs that appear to have first been published after March 1, 1989. Per COM:HIRTLE, the plates are therefore presumed copyrighted in the United States. As we cannot host copyrighted works absent an explicit free license, we likewise cannot host images of these plates on Commons. All images appear to have as their central focus the copyrighted license plates, so they use the copyrighted design in a greater-than-de minimis manner. As such, these files should be deleted in light of COM:PRP for lacking evidence of a valid free license for the copyrighted designs.
- File:New Hampshire 2017 License Plate.jpg
- File:New Hampshire License Plate (2000).jpg
- File:New Hampshire License Plate 2007.png
- File:New Hampshire License Plate 2017 Generic.png
- File:New Hampshire License Plate 2017.png
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
— Red-tailed hawk (nest) 15:42, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:51, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
Author requests deletion KetefHinnomFan (talk) 17:16, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:51, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Personal photo of the photographer. Chris.sherlock2 (talk) 18:59, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:52, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Personal photo of the photographer. Chris.sherlock2 (talk) 18:59, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:52, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Personal photo of the photographer. Chris.sherlock2 (talk) 18:59, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:52, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No idea what this photo is meant to represent, no educational use. Chris.sherlock2 (talk) 19:00, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:52, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Personal photo of photographer Chris.sherlock2 (talk) 19:02, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:52, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
copyright images of packaging Chris.sherlock2 (talk) 19:03, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:52, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Personal image of the photographer Chris.sherlock2 (talk) 19:17, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:53, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No possible educational use Chris.sherlock2 (talk) 19:17, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:53, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
personal image of photographer Chris.sherlock2 (talk) 19:19, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:53, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
personal image of photographer Chris.sherlock2 (talk) 19:19, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:53, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
personal images of photographer Chris.sherlock2 (talk) 19:19, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:53, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
personal image of photographer Chris.sherlock2 (talk) 19:20, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:53, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
personal image of photographer Chris.sherlock2 (talk) 19:20, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:54, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
this really has no content, and no educational reason to be on commons Chris.sherlock2 (talk) 19:20, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:54, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
personal photo of photographer Chris.sherlock2 (talk) 19:21, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:54, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
personal photo of photographer Chris.sherlock2 (talk) 19:21, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:53, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
personal photo of photographer Chris.sherlock2 (talk) 19:22, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:53, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
personal photo of photographer Chris.sherlock2 (talk) 19:22, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:53, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
copyright image of advertisement Chris.sherlock2 (talk) 19:25, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:53, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
personal photo of photographer Chris.sherlock2 (talk) 19:41, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:53, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
personal photo of photographer Chris.sherlock2 (talk) 19:43, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:53, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
personal photo of photographer Chris.sherlock2 (talk) 19:44, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:53, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
personal photo of photographer Chris.sherlock2 (talk) 20:00, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:54, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
photo of photographer Chris.sherlock2 (talk) 20:00, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:54, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
personal photo of photographer Chris.sherlock2 (talk) 20:02, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:54, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
personal photo of photographer Chris.sherlock2 (talk) 20:02, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:54, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
personal photo of photographer Chris.sherlock2 (talk) 20:02, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:54, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
personal photo of photographer Chris.sherlock2 (talk) 20:03, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:54, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
personal photo of photographer Chris.sherlock2 (talk) 20:03, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:54, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
personal photo of photographer Chris.sherlock2 (talk) 20:04, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:54, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unsure of copyright status PlateNerd (talk) 04:05, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 22:55, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
Unsure of copyright status PlateNerd (talk) 04:07, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 22:56, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
Image already exists in numerous other locations, including here: https://en.kinorium.com/name/5670705/. Uploader almost certainly not also author, no exif data, delete per precautionary principle if nothing else. A loose necktie (talk) 17:38, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work (F1). --Эlcobbola talk 16:10, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
This image was described as PD on the grounds that it was the work product of an employee of the US government in the performance of his official duties. However, even though this image was taken from a USGOV archive, photographer Donald English was not an employee of the US government. Rather, he was a freelancer working for the Desert Sea News Agency. It's possible that the image might be PD for other reasons, but I'm not sure which one would apply here. DS (talk) 00:04, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
I oppose this deletion. This is historic and needs to be retained. Find a good reason but retain it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ktho64152 (talk • contribs) 11:34, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
- There are lots of historic images that we don't have because they aren't properly licensed. Maybe a valid reason exists to retain the image, but maybe one doesn't. DS (talk) 14:19, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:14, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Ateliers et chantiers de Nantes
[edit]The building shown is w:fr:Maison des Hommes et des Techniques, built in 1917 and authored by René Ménard, who died in 1958. As there is no commercial freedom of panorama in France (see COM:FOP France), this architectural work is still under his posthumous copyright and is unfree. Copyright expires on January 1, 2029 (70+1 years after his death).
- File:Anciens Ateliers et chantiers de Nantes (1).jpg
- File:Anciens Ateliers et chantiers de Nantes (2).jpg
- File:Ateliers et chantiers de Nantes (1).jpg
- File:Ateliers et chantiers de Nantes (2).jpg
- File:Ateliers et chantiers de Nantes (depuis la rive droite) - Nantes.jpg
- File:Ateliers et chantiers de Nantes - Nantes.jpg
- File:Ateliers et chantiers de Nantes - Vue arrière.jpg
- File:Ateliers et chantiers de Nantes-5141.jpg
- File:Ateliers et chantiers de Nantes-5142.jpg
- File:Ateliers et chantiers de Nantes-5143.jpg
- File:Ateliers et chantiers de Nantes-5144.jpg
- File:Batiment des chantiers de l'ile de nante.jpg
- File:Nantes - ateliers et chantiers de Nantes (01).JPG
- File:Nantes - ateliers et chantiers de Nantes (02).JPG
- File:Nantes - ateliers et chantiers de Nantes (03).JPG
- File:Nantes - ateliers et chantiers de Nantes (04).JPG
- File:Nantes - ateliers et chantiers de Nantes (05).JPG
- File:Nantes - ateliers et chantiers de Nantes (06).JPG
- File:Nantes - ateliers et chantiers de Nantes (07).JPG
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Nantes.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:11, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
- @JWilz12345: Not to say your wrong, but the Wikidata entry for the building says it was built in 1961. So I assume these images are of the new building. Whereas, the one built by René Ménard was the older one that no longer exists. --Adamant1 (talk) 21:34, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
- @Adamant1 the Wikidata entry refers to the shipbuilding business that is currently headquartered in the building. The French Wikipedia article on the building does not indicate it being demolished or replaced with a new one, and Ménard is still credited as the building's architevt even now. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 22:18, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
- I might have misread something but from the French Wikipedia article and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ateliers et Chantiers de la Loire this one it sounds like the WiAteliers et chantiers de Nantes is the name of the shipyard where the business is located and it was rebuilt in 1961 from what was originally Ateliers et Chantiers de la Loire (a company yes, but also the ship yard). That's why the French article says "The Ateliers et Chantiers de Nantes is a shipyard born in 1961, from the merger of the Ateliers et Chantiers de Bretagne and the Nantes site of the Ateliers et Chantiers de la Loire." I don't know what else "the site" would be referring to except the shipyard. --Adamant1 (talk) 03:42, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
- @Adamant1 the Wikidata entry refers to the shipbuilding business that is currently headquartered in the building. The French Wikipedia article on the building does not indicate it being demolished or replaced with a new one, and Ménard is still credited as the building's architevt even now. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 22:18, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Whether 1917 by Menard d1958 or built in 1961, it is still under copyright. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:17, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Taiwan for non-architecture; see also this discussion for Taiwan Intellectual Property Office's change of opinion (December 2022), reverting back to the original, restrictive perspective by Wikimedia Commons before 2018.--2001:B011:A401:12F7:10D9:9677:EB9D:9B33 18:16, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Kept: procedural keep, abusive DR. --Krd 17:29, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
This is not architecture, does not qualify for COM:FOP Taiwan King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:40, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:19, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Unsure of copyright status PlateNerd (talk) 04:06, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
- Keep: the logo here is {{PD-textlogo}}. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:38, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:19, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Unsure of copyright status PlateNerd (talk) 04:06, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
- Keep: the logo here is {{PD-textlogo}}. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:39, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:20, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Unsure of copyright status PlateNerd (talk) 04:07, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:20, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Unsure of copyright status PlateNerd (talk) 04:08, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
- Keep: the logo here is {{PD-textlogo}}. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:39, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:21, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Unsure of copyright status PlateNerd (talk) 04:08, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
- Keep: the logo here is {{PD-textlogo}}. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:40, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:21, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Unsure of copyright status PlateNerd (talk) 04:08, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:21, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Unsure of copyright status PlateNerd (talk) 04:11, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:22, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:License plates of Kansas
[edit]These plates contain artwork that is above the threshold of originality in the United States. While Federal Government works are in the public domain in the United States, the same cannot be generally said for works of U.S. States; Kansas does not broadly dedicate its works to the public domain. All of these license plates bear designs that appear to have first been published after March 1, 1989. Per COM:HIRTLE, this would make the plates copyrighted in the United States. As we cannot host copyrighted works absent an explicit free license, we likewise cannot host images of these plates on Commons. These files should be deleted as such in light of COM:PRP.
- File:Kansas 2002 sample license plate.jpg
- File:Kansas Arts Foundation License Plate.jpg
- File:Kansas Horse Council License Plate.jpg
- File:Kansas License Plate 2020 Vanity - Photo Credits to Nathan Kuehn.jpg
- File:Kansas License Plate Arts Embossed 2015 - Photo Credits to Jason Smith.jpg
- File:Kansas License Plate Arts Foundation Flat - Photo Credits to Nathan Kuehn.jpg
- File:Kansas License Plate Base 2007-2018 (045 BKR).jpg
- File:Kansas License Plate Disabled Embossed 2016 - Photo Credits to Jason Smith.jpg
- File:Kansas License Plate Disabled Flat 2020 - Photo Credits to Nathan Kuehn.jpg
- File:Kansas License Plate Disabled State Capitol 2002 - Photo Credits to Nathan Kuehn.jpg
- File:Kansas License Plate Disabled Vet Flat 2020 - Photo Credits to Nathan Kuehn.jpg
- File:Kansas License Plate Disabled Vet State Capitol 2002 - Photo Credits to Nathan Kuehn.jpg
- File:Kansas License Plate Horse Council Flat - Photo Credits to Nathan Kuehn.jpg
- File:Kansas License Plate In God We Trust Embossed 2013 - Photo Credits to Jason Smith.jpg
- File:Kansas License Plate In God We Trust Flat - Photo Credits to Nathan Kuehn.jpg
- File:Kansas License Plate Personalized Flat State Seal 2022 - Photo Credits to Kyle Eilts.jpg
- File:Kansas License Plate Standard Flat September 2019.jpg
- File:Kansas License Plate State Capitol Amateur Radio 2002 - Photo by Jim Moini.jpg
- File:Kansas License Plate Sunflower State Vanity 2015-2018 Embossed - Photo by Reid Williamson.jpg
- File:Kansas Motorcycle License Plate 2001-2007.jpg
- File:Kansas Motorcycle License Plate 2007-2018.jpg
- File:Kansas Sample 2007 license plate.jpg
- File:Kansas Special Interest License Plate.jpg
- File:Kansas Standard License Plate 2001-2007.jpg
- File:Kansas Standard License Plate 2018-Present.jpg
- File:Kansas Street Rod License Plate.jpg
- File:Kansas Vanity Design 2000-2005.jpg
- File:Kansas Vanity License Plate 1995-2000.jpg
- File:Kansas Vanity Plate 2015-2020.jpg
- File:Kansas Vanity Plate 2020-2025.png
- File:Kansas Vanity Plate Design 2010-2015.jpg
- File:Late 2018-Present Kansas License Plate.jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
— Red-tailed hawk (nest) 04:26, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
- Keep - The seal dates back to the 19th century, making it Template:PD-old. The wordmark is Template:PD-textlogo. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 03:59, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
- I was unable to piece together that those partial crops of the seal were the seal, so thank you for helping on that.
- Related to the images that include creative elements that are not merely the seal (i.e. File:Kansas 2002 sample license plate.jpg, File:Kansas Arts Foundation License Plate.jpg, File:Kansas Horse Council License Plate.jpg, File:Kansas License Plate 2020 Vanity - Photo Credits to Nathan Kuehn.jpg, File:Kansas License Plate Arts Embossed 2015 - Photo Credits to Jason Smith.jpg, File:Kansas License Plate Arts Foundation Flat - Photo Credits to Nathan Kuehn.jpg, File:Kansas License Plate Disabled State Capitol 2002 - Photo Credits to Nathan Kuehn.jpg, File:Kansas License Plate Disabled Vet State Capitol 2002 - Photo Credits to Nathan Kuehn.jpg, File:Kansas License Plate Horse Council Flat - Photo Credits to Nathan Kuehn.jpg, File:Kansas License Plate In God We Trust Embossed 2013 - Photo Credits to Jason Smith.jpg, File:Kansas License Plate In God We Trust Flat - Photo Credits to Nathan Kuehn.jpg, File:Kansas License Plate In God We Trust Embossed 2013 - Photo Credits to Jason Smith.jpg, File:Kansas License Plate In God We Trust Flat - Photo Credits to Nathan Kuehn.jpg, File:Kansas License Plate State Capitol Amateur Radio 2002 - Photo by Jim Moini.jpg, File:Kansas License Plate Sunflower State Vanity 2015-2018 Embossed - Photo by Reid Williamson.jpg, File:Kansas Motorcycle License Plate 2001-2007.jpg, File:Kansas Standard License Plate 2001-2007.jpg, File:Kansas Vanity Design 2000-2005.jpg, File:Kansas Vanity License Plate 1995-2000.jpg, File:Kansas Vanity Plate 2015-2020.jpg, File:Kansas Vanity Plate 2020-2025.png, File:Kansas Vanity Plate Design 2010-2015.jpg), is there a reason, why they are in the public domain? The designs here are more than merely a simple wordmark. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 02:43, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
- All of these photos were either taken by myself or permission given to me from the original owner to upload and release the rights. As you have mentioned, the state seal dates back to the mid 1800s, so there should be no issues with any plates containing that. To the best of my knowledge and research ability, none of the other plates contain artwork that is copyrighted or trademarked in any way, and there are also no logos that are used on these plates that are copyrighted from organizations. Stowellg (talk) 23:07, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
- I agree that we have a valid license as it pertains to the thin copyright afforded to the photograph (if any; see COM:COREL). That being said, we also would need evidence that the various designs used in the background are in the public domain (or freely licensed) to host them on Commons. Creative designs first published on or after March 1, 1989 are copyrighted even if there was no copyright notice at publication and no registration of the copyrighted work; see COM:HIRTLE for more. As the various plates contain designs published more recently than that date, they appear to be copyrighted as a matter of U.S. law. Even if it is unlikely that the copyright owner would take action to enforce that copyright, we would still need permission from the copyright owner of the non-PD plate designs that are above COM:TOO USA to have them published under a valid free license. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 02:47, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
- I know someone that works for the Kansas Department of Revenue, and she is the one that approves these license plate designs before they go into production. I can ask her and see if there is copyrighted work associated with them or if they are in the public domain. Stowellg (talk) 23:05, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
- I agree that we have a valid license as it pertains to the thin copyright afforded to the photograph (if any; see COM:COREL). That being said, we also would need evidence that the various designs used in the background are in the public domain (or freely licensed) to host them on Commons. Creative designs first published on or after March 1, 1989 are copyrighted even if there was no copyright notice at publication and no registration of the copyrighted work; see COM:HIRTLE for more. As the various plates contain designs published more recently than that date, they appear to be copyrighted as a matter of U.S. law. Even if it is unlikely that the copyright owner would take action to enforce that copyright, we would still need permission from the copyright owner of the non-PD plate designs that are above COM:TOO USA to have them published under a valid free license. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 02:47, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - plates with only the seal are ok, everything else not. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:35, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Deletion request PlateNerd (talk) 04:30, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:35, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
File:French destroyer Latouche-Treville (D646) transits the North Atlantic Ocean in support of exercise Northern Viking 2022.jpg
[edit]_transits_the_North_Atlantic_Ocean_in_support_of_exercise_Northern_Viking_2022.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_transits_the_North_Atlantic_Ocean_in_support_of_exercise_Northern_Viking_2022.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Courtesy photo by German Navy, not a work from the US Department of Defense, thus the PD license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 08:40, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:36, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Image on the top is from a YouTube channel. I could not find the original video, but none of the channel's videos are under a free license. Bottom image is missing a source as well. Ixfd64 (talk) 05:33, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:35, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Taichi as no source (No source since) — Racconish 💬 05:39, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Racconish, are you contesting speedy deletion tags in these cases? If so, please tell us why. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:24, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
- I see no reason to question the authorship and the logo is in my opinion too simpe to be coyrighted; on the other hand, I wonder if we should keep such a personal creation of dubious educational value. — Racconish 💬 11:33, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
- That makes sense. Is that the same reason for the other deletion threads in this series? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:16, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: unofficial version, several official alternatives already at Category:JS Kabylie. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:38, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Εὐθυμένης as no source (No source since) — Racconish 💬 05:41, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, tiny crop from unknown source. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:38, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Εὐθυμένης as no source (No source since) — Racconish 💬 05:42, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, taken from FB. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:39, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Εὐθυμένης as no source (No source since) — Racconish 💬 05:43, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, taken from FB. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:39, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Εὐθυμένης as Dw no source since (dw no source since) — Racconish 💬 05:44, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:40, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Εὐθυμένης as Dw no source since (dw no source since) — Racconish 💬 05:44, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:40, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Copyright? Is the user = Pierce Harman Photography? See metadata. It is the only contribution of the user. Wouter (talk) 08:45, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:40, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. Solomon203 (talk) 09:35, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:41, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Knee-drawn poster of non notable web series, out of project scope Ignatus (talk) 14:32, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:20, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Copyright clearly visible on photo and no indication that permission was given to publish it. Mondo (talk) 14:42, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:21, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Here is a personal photo which is not an own work. 186.175.215.71 16:43, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope, no contributions by this user. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:21, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Commons:OOS: Please don't upload files from your personal game: Commons is meant for educational files (that can be used in Wikimedia projects). Enyavar (talk) 18:30, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:22, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
I am using the color version only Pinkpatsy (talk) 18:31, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Question So? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:05, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, superseded by File:Dominique Jolin couleur.jpg. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:23, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Hardly a notable person, signs of self-PR, out of project scope Ignatus (talk) 18:45, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:23, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Copyright? Is the user = OUMIT_CHALIL_IMPRAM? See metadata. It is the only contribution of the user. Wouter (talk) 19:51, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:24, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
image features a watermark from another website, comtradictimg likely copyright violation. 62.216.209.139 19:56, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:24, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
The filename is meaningless, the description links to File:Grand escalier de l'opéra Garnier.jpg which has nothing to do with the person shown. It is the only contribution of the user. Wouter (talk) 20:00, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:25, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: personal picture Enyavar (talk) 20:21, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:25, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Maria Virginia pitta (talk · contribs)
[edit]- File:Polish 20220219 120439679.png
- File:Polish 20220906 140840528.png
- File:Polish 20221021 181306023.png
- File:Gonzalo Nucci.png
- File:Polish 20220928 160259506.png
- File:Polish 20220906 140802213.png
A09 (talk) 18:50, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:56, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Maria Virginia pitta (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: Unused personal pictures
- File:Polish 20230129 143303272.png
- File:Polish 20230129 143330891.png
- File:Gonzalo Nucci.png
- File:Gonzalo Nucci.jpg
- File:IMG-20230210-WA0068.jpg
- File:Polish 20230225 190150331.png
- File:IMG-20230210-WA0049.jpg
- File:IMG-20230210-WA0074.jpg
Enyavar (talk) 20:28, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:26, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
"category:Casselman Bridge, National Road" should be renamed as "category:Casselman River Bridge" (official name) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nicole Sharp (talk • contribs) 20:35, 9 April 2023 (UTC) (UTC)
Kept: category has been moved here. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:30, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Copied from owner with out consent, stated license not applicable. 62.216.209.139 20:01, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; no evidence of a valid releaase from the copyright holder. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:57, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Copyrighted content improperly licensed under CC MyCatIsAChonk (talk) 21:24, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination; no evidence of a valid CC release by the copyright holder. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:56, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Poor quality and misleading, tendeancy against the current government of Vietnam NightJasian (talk) 00:30, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
- Comment The POV "Description" text needs to be changed, but has this been used by LGBT people in Vietnam or in exile from Vietnam? If it has, we should keep it but with appropriate changes. If not, we should delete it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:19, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:59, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 07:49, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:01, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
COM:FOP Vietnam was invalid since January 2023, image uploaded afterwards cannot be hosted on Commons A1Cafel (talk) 07:51, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:01, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
I uploaded it by mistake Tuantruong2312 (talk) 02:22, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, upload mistake; prompt uploader request. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 05:32, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
COM:FOP Vietnam was revoked since January 2023, image uploaded afterwards cannot be hosted on Commons A1Cafel (talk) 08:02, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:01, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
COM:FOP Vietnam was revoked since January 2023, image uploaded afterwards cannot be hosted on Commons A1Cafel (talk) 08:02, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:02, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
COM:FOP Vietnam was revoked since January 2023, image uploaded afterwards cannot be hosted on Commons A1Cafel (talk) 08:02, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:02, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
COM:FOP Vietnam was revoked since January 2023, image uploaded afterwards cannot be hosted on Commons A1Cafel (talk) 08:02, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:02, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Seems unlikely to have ever been a legitimate logo for anything relating to 20th Century Fox, Fox Entertainment Group, 21st Century Fox, or Fox Corporation ("Fox Group" was the initally announced name for what would become 21st Century Fox, but no logo was unveiled at that time). All I'm seeing in searches (besides logos for entities unrelated to the movie studio and its parent entities) are unofficial recreations on DeviantArt and the like. Not actively used anywhere. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:40, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:07, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
A speech or lecture given by a British figure at a location with the United Kingdom, The edition may be PD in the US, but the text of the lecture is not necessarily PD in the United Kingdom. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 19:03, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
- From what I can tell of the UK copyright law at the time of publication, [:w:Copyright Act 1911|Copyright Act 1911], which had life of the author + 50 years, the author died in 1964, so it's copyright would have expired in 2014, unless policy says otherwise on here. Reboot01 (talk) 12:37, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
- UK copyright terms were extended to 70years in the mid 1990's. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:59, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
- 1964+50 as you say would be 2014, but that means the work was still in copyright when the terms were extended. 1964+70 is 2034. This is a US edition though, was it within 30 days of the lecture in the UK? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:00, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
- I'm not sure when the original was published exactly, but this edition from Trubner and Co. [1] was published in 1923, which is the earliest one that I think was published, if nothing else we can move the US edition to Wikisource for local hosting and delete it off of Commons. Would any transcription progress be lost or would it be saved on wikisource? Reboot01 (talk) 18:10, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
- Provided the same filename was used on English Wikisource, you can keep any progress I think :) ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 21:30, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
- UK copyright terms were extended to 70years in the mid 1990's. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:59, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Country of origin is UK. THis is US edition,with copyright date 1924. Since the speech was given in February 1923, the 30 day rule does not apply. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:11, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Cannot find original source of photo, seems to be a blatant advertisement Chris.sherlock2 (talk) 20:06, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:14, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Two reasons for deletion:
- the image is stated to be taken from a video with CC license but none can be seen on the video.
- the image captured is actually a photographic within the video. There's no indication that Plus TV Africa took the image displayed in the video, which in turn was screenshot. The image could been licensed by Plus TV Africa for use in the video alone but then not for third party use elsewhere.
Either way it means there is a fair bit of ambiguity about the origins of the image. Lil-unique1 (talk) 21:14, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:14, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Delete reason: The map was created on the basis of original research, does not correspond to reality. The user did not provide the source.--Ilnur efende (talk) 19:54, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
- None of those are reasons on Commons for deletion. This isn't a Wikipedia. See COM:SCOPE. Andy Dingley (talk) 14:58, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
- Do you mean that you can fill in false cards here, which you invented yourself? Ilnur efende (talk) 16:39, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
- To some extent, yes. I can draw a work of fiction here and if I can make some reasonable claim that it passes COM:SCOPE, then it's valid to stay here (although there are a few editors here who don't accept SCOPE (even though it's policy) and would support deletion anyway – look at past arguments over flags and heraldry).
- So if you want to delete this, you'll need to make a stronger argument than "original research". Commons doesn't mind unsourced original research. Andy Dingley (talk) 17:50, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
- the problem here is that the user drew a map of a historical state, but this map does not correspond to reality and cannot be used somewhere, but the user inserts it everywhere. Ilnur efende (talk) 03:13, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
- @Ilnur efende: and you (repeatedly) uploaded an entirely different map, hijacking someone else's filename, which is a blatant violation of COM:OVERWRITE.
- I don't really care whether this is kept or deleted, but what I will say is that I would oppose using it in any Wikipedia article if no one can indicate what source or sources were used as the basis for these claimed borders. This should follow a description from some work(s) and should identify the work(s), and it should give an indication of what date it represents. Otherwise, it appears to be basically a work of fiction or fantasy. And that applies equally to the other version with which it has repeatedly been overwritten. - Jmabel ! talk 04:27, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
- While I'm at it: User:Татарин116, you removed the deletion notice twice from the file page. That is vandalism. If you do that again, you will be subject to a block. ( Via Google translate: "Вы дважды удалили уведомление об удалении со страницы файла. Это вандализм. Если вы сделаете это снова, ваша учетная запись будет заблокирована." I suspect "заблокирована" is wrong, but I have no idea what word would be better, if someone knows please feel free to clarify. (Я подозреваю, что «заблокирована» неправильно, но я понятия не имею, какое слово было бы лучше, если кто-то знает, пожалуйста, уточните.) - Jmabel ! talk 04:38, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
- the problem here is that the user drew a map of a historical state, but this map does not correspond to reality and cannot be used somewhere, but the user inserts it everywhere. Ilnur efende (talk) 03:13, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
- Do you mean that you can fill in false cards here, which you invented yourself? Ilnur efende (talk) 16:39, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
Карта Казанского ханства
[edit]
Хватит менять карту сделанную мной! Ваша версия из БРЭ слишком преувеличивает территорию государства. До уральских гор границы ханства не доходили . Татарин116 (talk) 17:23, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
- И с какой кстати вы присвоили авторство моей картинки себе? Татарин116 (talk) 19:24, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
- БРЭ это не АИ? Укажите свой источник, на катороый вы опирались? Ilnur efende (talk) 19:29, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
- Где сказано, что границы доходили так далеко на восток? Тем более по уральским горам? И ваша карта нарисована в криво в Paint. Татарин116 (talk) 14:19, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
- Столько времени мои карты были никому не мешали. Использовались также на ютуб в видео по истории. И тут пришли вы и исправляете все мои работы. Вас нужно изолировать от википедии, как вандала и проходимца. Татарин116 (talk) 14:21, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
- В удалении моей карты вам отказали. Так что шаблон убран. Татарин116 (talk) 16:30, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
- Товарищ, у вас есть источник на который вы ссылались при рисовании этой карты? Ilnur efende (talk) 16:47, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
- В удалении моей карты вам отказали. Так что шаблон убран. Татарин116 (talk) 16:30, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
Kept: In use -- cannot be deleted for this reason. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:17, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Datei wird nicht benötigt Berolina1871 (talk) 17:25, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 19:23, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
Yanlış fotoğraf yü Dj Azure Official (talk) 08:13, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 11:36, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Because it shows a signature of a public figure. This should be hidden Oykubono (talk) 18:35, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:10, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Because it shows a signature of a public figure. This should be hidden Oykubono (talk) 18:39, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:10, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
see results of TinEye und Google Lens, most likely not own work. Lukas Beck (talk) 16:51, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ezarateesteban 13:24, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
Copyright issues. same picture here [2] Elfabso (talk) 17:09, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ezarateesteban 13:24, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Invalid SVG flag. There are other file of the same flag, e.g. File:Flag of Lebanon.svg. Xeror (talk) 21:29, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ezarateesteban 13:27, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
The design of the samurai arrangement doesn't apply in {{PD-textlogo}}, there's a concern about the upload because isn't a national or regional flag. Taichi (talk) 21:31, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ezarateesteban 13:27, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Also :
- File:Farrere - Mademoiselle Dax (page 235 crop).jpg
- File:Farrere - Mademoiselle Dax (page 276 crop).jpg
- File:Farrere - Mademoiselle Dax (page 56 crop).jpg
- File:Farrere - Mademoiselle Dax (page 9 crop).jpg
- File:Farrere - Mademoiselle Dax (page 95 crop).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
May be done speedy. Copyighted till 2039, undele in 2040 Havang(nl) (talk) 11:42, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
-20230409114200-File:Farrere_-_Mademoiselle_Dax_(page_183_crop).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:41, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files in Category:License plates of Nebraska
[edit]These plates contain artwork that is above the threshold of originality in the United States. While Federal Government works are in the public domain in the United States, the same cannot be generally said for works of U.S. States; Nebraska does not broadly dedicate its works to the public domain. All of these license plates bear two-dimensional designs that appear to have first been published after March 1, 1989. Per COM:HIRTLE, the plates are therefore presumed copyrighted in the United States. As we cannot host copyrighted works absent an explicit free license, we likewise cannot host images of these plates on Commons. All images appear to have as their central focus the copyrighted license plates, so they use the design in a greater-than-de minimis manner. As such, these files should be deleted in light of COM:PRP for lacking a valid free license for the copyrighted designs.
(For more information on some of the designs, this news article provides the history of some of the plates.)
- File:1991 Nebraska license plate 1-D6756.jpg
- File:1993-1995 Nebraska License Plate.jpg
- File:2000 Nebraska license plate 21-CU31.jpg
- File:2005 Nebraska license plate 5-B3813.jpg
- File:2005 Nebraska license plate SAM 123.jpg
- File:2005-2010 Nebraska License Plate.jpg
- File:2011 Nebraska license plate 20-AG65.jpg
- File:Nebraska 2018 License Plate.jpg
- File:Nebraska ABC license plate.png
- File:Nebraska Beef State License Plate.png
- File:Nebraska Chimney Rock skyline license plate.png
- File:Nebraska Choose Life License Plates.png
- File:Nebraska Ducks Unlimited Inc. License Plates.png
- File:Nebraska Growing Nebraska License Plate.png
- File:Nebraska Handicap License Plate 2017.png
- File:Nebraska Henry Doorly Zoo License Plates.png
- File:Nebraska Husker license plate 1999-2001.jpg
- File:Nebraska license plate 1993-1995 from Ryan Smith private collection..jpg
- File:Nebraska License Plate 1997 from Ryan Smith private collection..jpg
- File:Nebraska license plate 2002-2004 from the private collection of Jim Smith.jpg
- File:Nebraska license plate 2011-2016.jpg
- File:Nebraska license plate 2017 big counties.jpg
- File:Nebraska license plate 2017 message plate.png
- File:Nebraska License Plate Ducks Unlimited 2017.jpg
- File:Nebraska License Plate The Beef State 2017.jpg
- File:Nebraska Mountain Lion Plate 2017 000AB format.jpg
- File:Nebraska Mountain Lion Plate from the private collection of Ryan Smith.jpg
- File:Nebraska Native American Cultural Awareness and History License Plates.png
- File:Nebraska Union Pacific License Plate from private collection of Ryan Smith.jpg
— Red-tailed hawk (nest) 15:34, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:40, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
_-_2021-05-23_-_6.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2021-05-23_-_5.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2021-05-23_-_4.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2021-05-23_-_5.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2021-05-23_-_3.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2021-05-23_-_4.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2021-05-23_-_3.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2021-05-23_-_2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2021-05-22_-_1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2021-05-22_-_1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2021-05-22_-_2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2021-05-22_-_1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2021-05-21_-_1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2021-05-21_-_2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2021-05-20_-_1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2021-05-20_-_2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2021-05-20_-_1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2021-05-20_-_1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2021-05-20_-_2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2021-05-20_-_2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2021-05-20_-_1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
The building shown is w:fr:Maison des Hommes et des Techniques, built in 1917 and authored by René Ménard, who died in 1958. As there is no commercial freedom of panorama in France (see COM:FOP France), this architectural work is still under his posthumous copyright and is unfree. Copyright expires on January 1, 2029 (70+1 years after his death), at which point these photos will be restored/undeleted.
- File:Maison Hommes Techniques - Nantes (FR44) - 2022-09-18 - 4.jpg
- File:Maison Hommes Techniques - Nantes (FR44) - 2022-09-18 - 3.jpg
- File:Maison Hommes Techniques - Nantes (FR44) - 2022-09-18 - 2.jpg
- File:Maison Hommes Techniques - Nantes (FR44) - 2022-09-18 - 1.jpg
_-_2022-09-18_-_4.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2022-09-18_-_3.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2022-09-18_-_2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2022-09-18_-_1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 22:49, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:37, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
File contains copyrighted logos, was unaware this was not allowed at the time. Maurice Oly (talk) 23:22, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
- Comment This one may have to be deleted, depending on how many of the logos are copyrighted, because the logos occupy a good portion of the picture frame, in this case. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:01, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:36, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
Copyvio https://m.facebook.com/ChrisMinnsMP WWGB (talk) 09:19, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Túrelio. --Rosenzweig τ 13:48, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
copyvio https://www.facebook.com/ChrisMinnsMP WWGB (talk) 09:54, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete: we already have a photo of him and this is clearly just a copyvio from Facebook. 110.150.42.113 12:00, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Túrelio. --Rosenzweig τ 13:48, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This uploader has a track record of poor copyright choices and lack of permission with uploads. Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:VRT. Potential copyright violation. COM:PCP applies.
File:Newhaven Yacht Club in 2022.jpg- File:Aerial View of Newhaven in 2021.jpg
- File:Front of Urangeline House at Carey Baptist Grammar School in 2023.jpg
- File:Stain glass window behind the altar at St Hilary’s Anglican Church, Kew.jpg
🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 22:43, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
- Excuse me @Timtrent, I understand that you have nominated the deletion of almost all of the images that I have recently uploaded. I understand that you are going through a process due to my past record from months ago, but the current images that are listed above that have not been deleted are all my photos and I have taken them accordingly. Your accusations based on my past (when I did not understand the rules of uploading photographs) are behind me. So I invite you to stop falsely accusing me of this and move on.
- Thanks. Carey3146 (talk) 23:57, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
- @Carey3146 I invite you to provide the correct proof of licensing to COM:VRT. Your track record necessitates this. While I am required to, and continue to assume good faith your track record has stretched that to its elastic limit. Your talk page is evidence of this. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 05:41, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
Ticket:2023041010002053 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 06:00, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
- Ticket:2023041010002099 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 08:00, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
- Ticket:2023041010002035 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 05:00, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
- Ticket:2023041010002106 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 05:00, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: VRT agent (verify): I've merged all tickets into 2023041010002035. I've been swimming in an Ocean of excuses. It was impossible for me to verify the authorship of any of the files. I.e., the user argues that the metadata "are there", but they're not or indicate the use of a scanner. I'll reject all permissions except for File:Newhaven Yacht Club in 2022.jpg, because I didn't accept it, but @Krd (talk · contribs), obviously in good faith. Nevertheless, I think that the lack of EXIF in the file in this context it's highly suspicious.
I'd like to also include in this DR the next files:
- File:Alan Jackson in July 1995.jpg - It seem from a newspaper
- File:Alan Jackson of BTR Nylex in 1995.jpg - Idem
File:Alan Jackson in 1991.jpg - Too low resolution; probably cropped from another in a paper, but the user can't show us the originalThe customer send the original, full body, paper photo. --Ganímedes (talk) 12:45, 23 April 2023 (UTC)- File:Jindivick Foundation Plaque of Joseph Jackson.jpg - EXIF says clearly "Screenshot"
File:Alan Jackson with fellow executives in the 1980s.jpg - not original for sure
The customer sent a new shot of the original, paper photo. --Ganímedes (talk) 12:45, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
- File:St Hilary’s Anglican Church Kew.jpg - This is the only one with EXIF and I tend to believe it's original, so I suggest keeping it.
- File:Carey Baptist Grammar School first day in 1923.jpg - And this is PD-old, so I also recommend to keep.
Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 02:09, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
- @Ganímedes Thank you for your concise analysis. The uploader's talk page shows a history of a strange attitude towards licencing. I have had, and expressed by DR and other mechanisms, severe doubts about the great majority of their uploads. Your "Ocean of Excuses" was not unexpected.
- The aerial view of the yacht club is a case in point. Unless the uploader has access to an aircraft and has sat in it taking the picture personally they cannot be the copyright owner unless it has been transferred to them by an act of law.
- This DR is probably not the place to deal with the current images that are listed above that have not been deleted are all my photos and I have taken them accordingly. Your accusations based on my past (when I did not understand the rules of uploading photographs) are behind me. So I invite you to stop falsely accusing me of this and move on., but I think it is time for administrative attention. I request the eventual closer of this DR to take a view on this. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 07:56, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
- With regard to the aerial view photo of Newhaven, I did take that photo from a helicopter. Just check the website of Newhaven helicopter tours. One cannot assume anything to be impossible. Carey3146 (talk) 12:32, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
- Also, if these photos are not to be found any where on an internet search, then it clearly shows that these photographs are mine. Can someone respond to this dilemma? Carey3146 (talk) 04:35, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
- @Carey3146 That argument is fallacious. It is not a dilemma.
- Not all copyrighted pictures are on the internet. I am sure you know this. It is also pointless to tell us that a helicopter tour exists nearby. What is important, assuming you have not yet done so, is to prove your ownership of the copyright using COM:VRT. The process works to protect both copyright owners and Wikimedia Commons. You have used it successfully in the past. This time a VRT volunteer has expressed doubt. Your job is to seek to remove that doubt, and to do so by use of facts via VRT.
- As you know, part of the VRT process is to restore any deleted pictures where copyright ownership and the ability to licence the worker is proven. Please direct your attention to the VRT channel. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 12:37, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
- I believe I have gone through all of the available avenues to prove my ownership of the photographs, but I am still denied. They say that some of my photographs do not have 'EXIF' data, but all of the photos that I have uploaded, I have followed up with the full photograph or the photo that I uploaded in the first place was the original and unmodified version. I am stuck in limbo and no one is telling me in plain English why all these photos cannot be published now. Carey3146 (talk) 21:37, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
- @Carey3146 Discuss this through COM:VRT. This is a discussion about deletion. You cannot achieve here what you have not achieved through VRT. It is the formal channel. If you do not understand what they have said ask them for clarification. "I am stuck in limbo and no one is telling me in plain English why all these photos cannot be published now" means you need to use VRT to solve this. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 22:19, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
- I believe I have gone through all of the available avenues to prove my ownership of the photographs, but I am still denied. They say that some of my photographs do not have 'EXIF' data, but all of the photos that I have uploaded, I have followed up with the full photograph or the photo that I uploaded in the first place was the original and unmodified version. I am stuck in limbo and no one is telling me in plain English why all these photos cannot be published now. Carey3146 (talk) 21:37, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
- Also, if these photos are not to be found any where on an internet search, then it clearly shows that these photographs are mine. Can someone respond to this dilemma? Carey3146 (talk) 04:35, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
- With regard to the aerial view photo of Newhaven, I did take that photo from a helicopter. Just check the website of Newhaven helicopter tours. One cannot assume anything to be impossible. Carey3146 (talk) 12:32, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
- So if you recommend it to stay then shouldn’t the ticket be accepted? Just wondering? Carey3146 (talk) 12:34, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: 4 files have VRT permissions now (and were not deleted), the rest were all already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 21:20, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
Unclear copyright with precedent in Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:The NATO Hymn. For those looking to replace it: use the "external links" section, or the Template:external media template. 103.167.134.166 06:08, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Ruthven. --Rosenzweig τ 11:01, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
File:Orenstein & Koppel, Typ 3-191, C n2t in Bialosliwie, August 1969 (Klaus Jünemann und Klaus Kieper, Die Triebfahrzeuge der polnischen Schmalspurbahnen, Der Modelleisenbahner 4, 1970, S. 124).jpg
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file may meet the criteria for speedy deletion. This file is a copyright violation because it is copyrighted and not published under a free license. The file is subject to speedy deletion unless it is relicensed according to the Commons licensing policy. This file is a copyright violation for the following reason - Author is unknown. Licence is invalid. Photo scanned from magazine published in 1970 in East Germany. Please refer to Commons:Publication. There is no evidence that it was published before 1994 in Poland. Please refer to Commons:Project scope/Evidence. Probably the photo was taken by one of the authors of the article published in the magazine. The railway was a strategic object in a communist country. An ordinary person would be brutally beaten by the security services for taking such a picture. Respecting copyright is not about making claims without evidence. It never means that someone can scan a photo from a book and a recipe that they introduce shortly after creating it. Copyright should not be implied. This should be based on unequivocal evidence. No one can ever immediately assume that a photo was published immediately after it was taken. This can never be an arbitrary decision by one editor. Uoijm77 (talk) 11:11, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
- Please keep. The photograph was taken in August 1969 in Bialosliwie (Poland) and is thus public domain. We do not need to confirm the nationality of the photographer, but we check the location, where the photo has been taken (in this case Poland, as shown in the caption on page 127). Otherwise, a tourist could request that the laws of his home country should be applied to his photos. A public domain photo does not get protected by being printed in a foreign country. Only the collation of four photos on one page is protected by GDR copyright, but the page is not reproduced here.--NearEMPTiness (talk) 11:37, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
- The template clearly states that the photo must be taken by a Polish photographer or previously published in Poland. Uoijm77 (talk) 11:50, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
- However the law says "Art. 6. Prawo autorskie doznaje ochrony, jeżeli: ... 4) ochrona wynika z układów międzynarodowych lub polega na wzajemności." --NearEMPTiness (talk) 11:57, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
- The photo is subject to copyright protection. Uoijm77 (talk) 12:09, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
- I am no lawyer, but I believe the photo is public domain in Poland, as it has been taken in Poland in August 1969, and it is not subject to copyright protection in the German Democratic Republic, although it has been subsequently printed there. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 12:14, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
- The rules indicated in the template clearly indicate that it is not in the public domain Uoijm77 (talk) 12:24, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
- I am no lawyer, but I believe the photo is public domain in Poland, as it has been taken in Poland in August 1969, and it is not subject to copyright protection in the German Democratic Republic, although it has been subsequently printed there. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 12:14, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
- The photo is subject to copyright protection. Uoijm77 (talk) 12:09, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
- However the law says "Art. 6. Prawo autorskie doznaje ochrony, jeżeli: ... 4) ochrona wynika z układów międzynarodowych lub polega na wzajemności." --NearEMPTiness (talk) 11:57, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
- The template clearly states that the photo must be taken by a Polish photographer or previously published in Poland. Uoijm77 (talk) 11:50, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Per the text of the source article at [3], the photographs there were taken by German photographers (and model railway enthusiasts) (Klaus) Kieper, (Lothar) Nickel, and (Helmut) Pochadt on excursions in Poland. There is nothing in the article to suggest that the photos were published in Poland first. So PD-Poland does not apply, and German copyright applies. de:Klaus Kieper died in 2018, Helmut Pochadt must have died in 2010 or 2011 (his obituary is listed in the table of contents here), Lothar Nickel probably died in 1991 (I found an obituary for a Lothar Nickel listed in the TOC of a January 1992 model railroader magazine). Since we don't know which of the three named photographers took this photograph, the file can be restored in 2089, 70 + 1 years after Kieper's death. US copyright will have expired by then as well. --Rosenzweig τ 11:23, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
See File_talk:Our_Lady_of_Ipswich.jpg
Deleted: No source given on the en-WP page in the initial 2008 upload. —holly {chat} 16:39, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by S8321414 as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Non-free logo|source=https://www.jjvs.ntpc.edu.tw/main_n.php?tpl=1&ver=default. COM:TOO? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:34, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:29, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by S8321414 as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Non-free logo|source=https://www.tkgsh.tn.edu.tw/nss/p/index. COM:TOO? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:34, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:29, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by S8321414 as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Non-free logo|source=https://www.dwvs.cy.edu.tw/dwvs/index.php. COM:TOO? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:34, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:29, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
The licensing information says that the file is licensed under the "Government Open Data License - India", but I'm not convinced an image posted to Twitter, rather than hosted on the government website, would be covered by that. The image was posted to Twitter by the official account of the President of India, but there is nothing I can see there to suggest it might be covered by the GODL license. We have no idea who took the photo for one thing, it might not have been a government employee. Amakuru (talk) 14:08, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
- "it might not have been a government employee" ... of course. The President of India may have had dozens of photos taken that day by the official photographer but he decided for this one twitter post that he would steal a pic off the web and get another of his employees to post it to his official twitter feed.... but is it likely? The twitter feed is his, its his employee. Why would he or she decide to not use the photos taken by the official photographer? I see no evidence to support this unlikely scenario. Victuallers (talk) 14:58, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep I also don't particularly like Twitter as a source to be honest, but it's the world we live in. To work it through:
- The image was posted at https://twitter.com/rashtrapatibhvn/status/1501099664774668291
- The profile of rashtrapatibhvn says "This is the official Twitter account of Rashtrapati Bhavan and is run by the President’s Secretariat. Tweets from the President are signed #PresidentKovind"
- The license under which this picture is published on wikicommons is Template:GODL-India which says: Following the mandate of the National Data Sharing and Accessibility Policy (NDSAP) of Government of India that applies to all shareable non-sensitive data available either in digital or analog forms but generated using public funds by various agencies of the Government of India, all users are provided a worldwide, royalty-free, non-exclusive license to use, adapt, publish (either in original, or in adapted and/or derivative forms), translate, display, add value, and create derivative works (including products and services), for all lawful commercial and non-commercial purposes, and for the duration of existence of such rights over the data or information.
- This picture is shared in digital form by an official account of the Government of India, therefore i see no problem with it being on commons under this license Mujinga (talk) 19:02, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
- Two weeks on, can this be closed? Mujinga (talk) 22:42, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- @Mujinga: yes, alright. I'm not entirely happy with this, as it doesn't seem completely unambiguous, but if the community has decided it's OK then so be it! Amakuru (talk) 11:30, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Ellywa (talk) 22:07, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by LifetimeWiki as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: The contents of this site may not be reproduced partially or fully, without due permission from The President of India. See Yann (talk) 21:58, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
- Is the President above the law? Surely we comply with the law. There are a million examples of where someone says that they claim a copyright... but Wiki has always gone with the law. The proposer if you look above was arguing that the photo was not taken by the President, or that some minion was interpreting his wishes .... seems that the rationale changes and we are to assume (today) that the President does have authority and some minion has not interfered. I continue to argue that the law is the key issue here. The license is not revokable whoever you are. Victuallers (talk) 22:30, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:32, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Đơn giản là tôi as no permission (No permission since). COM:TOO? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:43, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Kept: PD-textlogo, in use. --Yann (talk) 11:57, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Shizhao as no permission (No permission since). COM:TOO? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:43, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Kept: PD-textlogo. --Yann (talk) 11:58, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Unsure of copyright status PlateNerd (talk) 04:07, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Kept: US car plate, usually OK. --Yann (talk) 11:59, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
Unsure of copyright status PlateNerd (talk) 04:09, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
- Keep: the logo here is {{PD-textlogo}}. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:40, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
Kept: See above. --Yann (talk) 11:59, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
Unsure of copyright status PlateNerd (talk) 04:09, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Kept: PD-textlogo. --Yann (talk) 12:00, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
Unsure of copyright status PlateNerd (talk) 04:10, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Kept: US car plate, usually OK. --Yann (talk) 12:01, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope Lotje (talk) 10:11, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep if there are no copyright problems, as a decent though slanted portrait of a transgender woman is in scope, and Category:Transgender women of Australia is not heavily populated. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:29, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Kept: as per Ikan Kekek. --Yann (talk) 12:01, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
copyvio, no permission for the depicted photos on book covers. Martin Sg. (talk) 11:46, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Each book cover is de minimis. --Yann (talk) 12:02, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Spicy as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10. One useful contribution, so not F10-eligible, but still out of COM:SCOPE. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:28, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Personal image by non contributor. --Yann (talk) 12:03, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
copyright images of packaging Chris.sherlock2 (talk) 19:03, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: McDonald logo is PD-textlogo. --Yann (talk) 12:05, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Lacks information about the age of the painting and who the painter is. Thuresson (talk) 19:59, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Third-party website Alamy attests to the fact that this is in the public domain. Knut Wicksell died in 1926, so if this painting was made during his lifetime it would be {{PD-US}} as being from before 1928. Per COM:Sweden, anonymous works only hold copyright for 70 years after publication—I can't find any information about the painter, but in the case that we have an unknown Swedish painter and a file that is known to be PD in the USA then this should be kept. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 04:10, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
- All speculation of course and Alamy does not have any information about the painter, which year this was created or why they belive it public domain. The image was first uploaded to English Wikipedia in 2004 by a user whose talk page is filled with issues regarding uploaded images. Thuresson (talk) 20:28, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: as per RTH. --Yann (talk) 12:07, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
عدم امکان ارائه مستندات حق انتشار MQebleh (talk) 22:35, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 12:09, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by EurekaLott as no permission (No permission since). 1970 US photo, should be discussed for no notice. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:46, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: This photo comes from the Cleveland Press newspaper, and I cannot imagine that it would have been published without a copyright notice, and so per the Hirtle chart, it won't be PD until 2066. —holly {chat} 21:50, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by EurekaLott as no permission (No permission since). 1977 US photo, should be discussed for no notice. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:46, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: This photo comes from the Cleveland Press newspaper, and I cannot imagine that it would have been published without a copyright notice, and so per the Hirtle chart, it won't be PD until 2073. —holly {chat} 21:51, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by EurekaLott as no permission (No permission since). 1961 US photo, should be discussed for no notice. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:46, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Kept: There does not appear to have been any renewals for Cleveland Press copyrights in 1989 (not surprising, since the newspaper closed in 1982), so {{PD-US-not renewed}} applies. —holly {chat} 21:56, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
copyright, see Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Malaysia#Currency Wiki Farazi (talk) 12:42, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 22:20, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
Photo from the artist's website, no permission or CC licensing. "Own work" doubtful: names of photographers on her website do not include the (unverified) name of the uploader. 2003:C0:8F15:4E00:61B2:3AFE:A2AC:79AE 18:30, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 22:35, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Triman Ranvir (talk · contribs)
[edit]These images are clearly not his own work.
.jpg){kind=link}
Cabayi (talk) 11:44, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
- @Cabayi: You're making the assumption that User:Triman Ranvir is the footballer himself and not someone close to him (e.g., agent, family member) who created an account with that username. I couldn't find any of these 3 images via TinEye, so at this point I have no evidence of copyvio. —holly {chat} 22:19, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
- Howcheng, you're right - w:en:Special:Diff/1148964634. As commons tolerates both impersonation and undeclared paid editing, and he didn't use his sockpuppet on commons either, I guess that's it. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Cabayi (talk) 08:35, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion; when/if their sandbox article gets deleted, then we can come back and delete these for being out of scope. —holly {chat} 16:06, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:License plates of Illinois
[edit]These plates contain artwork that is above the threshold of originality in the United States. While Federal Government works are in the public domain in the United States, the same cannot be generally said for works of U.S. States; Illinois does not dedicate its works to the public domain. All of these license plates bear designs that appear to have first been published after March 1, 1989. Per COM:HIRTLE, this would make the plates copyrighted in the United States. As we cannot host copyrighted works absent an explicit free license, we likewise cannot host images of these plates on Commons. These files should be deleted as such.
- File:2001 Illinois License Plate.jpg
- File:2005 Illinois truck license plate.jpg
- File:2018 Illinois license plate.jpg
- File:2022 Illinois motorcycle license plate.jpg
- File:Illinois 2002 series passenger plate sample 000 0000.gif
- File:Illinois 2016 Series Passenger License Plate.png
- File:Illinois 2017 License Plate V1.jpg
- File:Illinois 2017 License Plate V2.jpg
- File:Illinois 2017 License Plate V3.jpg
- File:Illinois 2020 License Plate.png
- File:Illinois 2020-2021 License Plate.png
- File:Illinois R. of Macedonia plate.jpg
— Red-tailed hawk (nest) 04:14, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
- Keep - The Abraham Lincoln image dates back to 19th century, making it Template:PD-old. The wordmark is Template:PD-textlogo. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 03:58, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
- 1) Can you give me a link to the specific image? I'm not able to find the specific image of lincoln being published in the 19th century.
- 2) I'm going to also go out on a limb and say that the plates that contain the outlines of the buildings in a linear arrangement (i.e. File:Illinois 2017 License Plate V1.jpg, File:Illinois 2017 License Plate V2.jpg, and File:Illinois 2017 License Plate V3.jpg, and File:Illinois 2020-2021 License Plate.png) are probably above COM:TOO USA independently of Lincoln's face.
- — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 02:34, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
- @Illegitimate Barrister Anyway, I'm not sure File:Illinois R. of Macedonia plate.jpg could also be so-kept as it's published in North Macedonia ("Republic of Macedonia" in the then era), we need a clarification on TOO status here. At the moment, I would say a little pro- Delete for this one unless TOO requirement in North Macedonia is at least same as US. (PS: Another problem affects this N. Macedonian one is shown here: Not OK for 2D works.) Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:42, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
- @Kiril Simeonovski: ^^ Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 22:52, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
- @Red-tailed hawk: The image of Lincoln is almost certainly a derivative of File:Abraham Lincoln - DPLA - 362afb7df9105e2f1aeb576f50280d9c (page 1).jpg, but it's sufficiently different that it would have its own copyright. —holly {chat} 22:04, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Deleted the ones with the Lincoln face and ones that would be above the ToO. Kept the motorcycle license photograph since I don't see the Lincoln face and the rest appears to be below the ToO in the US. --Abzeronow (talk) 15:59, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
erroreously named duplicate of Guitar-3-string-minor-chord-x-3b-1-5-x-x.svg Hunsvotti (talk) 09:21, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
- @Hunsvotti: But File:Guitar-3-string-minor-chord-x-3b-1-5-x-x.svg is a different image. —holly {chat} 22:11, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: If erroneously named, we can rename. Not a reason for deletion. Also the files are different. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:00, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
Personal Viuser (talk) 12:43, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
- @Viuser: I'm sorry, I don't understand the reason for your request. —holly {chat} 22:21, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:01, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
This file must be renamed because Regiuni Româneşti means "Romanian regions". Renamed as Regiuni istorice în România și vecinătate meaning "Historic regions in Romania and neighborough". --2A01:CB1C:821F:A400:D013:56:E71D:6793 12:36, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Nominated for deletion to appeal Ecelan speedy deletion request. Ecelan message was: derivative work from internet (https://www.tranviasdezaragoza.es/tranvia-zgz/pdfs/Encarte_Plano.pdf). Andreuvv (talk) 13:26, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
- Keep I made the map by myself. I tried to recreate the original one style but just using text and simple shapes to create the line. I did not add elements that could be beyond that threshold like city shields and pictures. If community thinks that any of these elements is beyond that threshold, I can edit the map to remove it instead of deleting the whole image. --Andreuvv (talk) 13:40, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
- @Andreuvv: Your image is far too similar to the original. Not just the color scheme, but the little icons used for stations and transfers. Are you able to make a new version? —holly {chat} 22:32, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
- I'm willing to wait another week before deleting this, Andreuvv, can you make a new version as Holly requests? (which would be kept). Abzeronow (talk) 16:03, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:14, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
