Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2020/12/13

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive December 13th, 2020
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Aadil9936 (talk) 20:02, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 20:11, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

want to delete Aadil9936 (talk) 20:14, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 20:17, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong file, it is somebody else's photo from the same concert and the same angle. The use of this file violates copyright. GT20015 (talk) 12:50, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 15:22, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non-free logo Martin Urbanec (talk) 18:58, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Speedy per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 19:08, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please delete due to eroneous creation, all content is in Archive 1 Liberaler Humanist (talk) 18:44, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deleted per COM:CSD#U1. -- CptViraj (talk) 04:25, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please delete due to eroneous creation, all content is in Archive 1 Liberaler Humanist (talk) 18:45, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deleted per COM:CSD#U1. -- CptViraj (talk) 04:26, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Alicia Wiley (talk) 22:12, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deleted per COM:CSD#G7. -- CptViraj (talk) 04:22, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work under all the words Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:05, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Downloaded from the original 2016 November 2 version on Facebook.--2409:4073:4E80:6BFA:7CDE:AC30:D5E9:F981 11:12, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, speedied as obvious copyvio.  JGHowes  talk 12:27, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

likely false copyright information; copyrighted logo TommiWalle (talk) 16:36, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tommi!
This logo and it's copyrights belong to Finnish Dance Sport Federation (FDSF). I've been assigned to update their wikipedia page and I have a permission to use the logo.
BR, Jere
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Tanssiurheilu2020 (talk • contribs) 17:13, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If the logo belongs to the FDSF, you have wrongly marked it on the file description page as your own work. You have also published it under a Creative Commons licence, which brings up the question: has the FDSF given you the permission to sublicence the logo? Wikimedia Commons only accepts freely licenced media files that can be used by anyone. I assume that the FDSF has not given you permission to release the logo under the CC BY-SA 4.0 licence, in which case you should instead upload it to the Finnish Wikipedia (preferrably in PNG or SVG file format instead of JPEG) and mark it there as a fair use logo (see Wikipedia:Tiedostojen käyttösäännöt & Malline:Logo). If my assumption is wrong and you have been given the permission to sublicence the logo, you should get OTRS as requested earlier. --TommiWalle (talk) 10:51, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your message! Yes, the logo is wrongly marked and published under a wrong licence. I have now asked this image to be deleted also. Sorry for this mess! I need to upload all the images again with proper licences. Tanssiurheilu2020 (talk) 14:21, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 14:39, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:09, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

flickr photo of random meeting, without useful description, doesn't seem to be in scope. Pibwl (talk) 10:58, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Oppose, I've now added a description including the names and positions of the people who are attending (all senior MIT Media Lab faculty) John Cummings (talk) 17:30, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Now that we have names the photo could realistically be used. --Gbawden (talk) 09:25, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

moved from File talk:Arra-beba.jpg: Please remove this image because it was uploaded accidentally, I hope to hear from you. Sincere, Planeti. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Planeti (talk • contribs) 20:05, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It was uploaded by mistake. Liridon (talk) 17:09, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • User that uploaded doesn't know procedures of nominating it for deletion, but he contacted me and has added a comment in talk page.

It was uploaded by mistake. Ardianazizi (talk) 17:32, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 19:01, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Recently uploaded, unused, redundant to File:WWE white logo.svg. ƏXPLICIT 02:44, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 03:39, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pandadri (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Tagged as {{PD-textlogo}}, but these designs are clearly complex enough to be above the threshold of originality.

ƏXPLICIT 02:57, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 03:39, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution, no EXIF data – unlikely to be the work of the uploader. AFBorchert (talk) 06:23, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 03:39, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very low resolution (100x100 px, size 4 kb). Fails COM:EDUSE. There are better alternatives in the category where this is found. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:34, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 03:39, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image without any encyclopedic value. Johnj1995 (talk) 06:41, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, risk of copyright violation, TinEye shows multiple examples that date from before the upload here. Verbcatcher (talk) 16:02, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 03:39, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

file is not an original and looks to be a screenshot  — billinghurst sDrewth 09:13, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, probable copyright violation, available in news reports dated before upload here.[1][2] Original source may be Instagram.[3] Verbcatcher (talk) 16:18, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 03:40, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Asrorbek Abdukhomidov (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal images from a non contributor. Commons is not a web hosting site.

Herby talk thyme 11:20, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 03:40, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by GRAVETO CAPOEIRA (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:05, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 09:35, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by GRAVETO CAPOEIRA (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:10, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 03:41, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by GRAVETO CAPOEIRA (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:07, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:29, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by JBahramzada (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:05, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 03:42, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope and not sure copyright (marked on the drawing). Pibwl (talk) 17:06, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete as possible copyright violation. In a Facebook posting dated before upload here,[4] albeit with a different text overlay. Incorporates the Laughing Colours logo,[5] no indication of a free licence at their website. Verbcatcher (talk) 19:40, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 03:42, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

book cover photo, sole upload. Pibwl (talk) 17:06, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 03:42, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

technically bad photograph, with no educational use. Pibwl (talk) 17:08, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 03:42, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cover art for an album - unlikely to be "own work" by uploader Esprit Fugace (talk) 17:28, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete, album covers are usually assumed to be non-free.[6][7] Verbcatcher (talk) 20:12, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 03:43, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot from TV Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 17:28, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 03:43, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work Esprit Fugace (talk) 17:28, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete risk of copyright violation, available on web postings dated before upload here.[8][9] Looks like a publicity photo. Verbcatcher (talk) 20:08, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 03:43, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo wothout educational use Drakosh (talk) 17:29, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 03:43, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This looks like an album cover or poster which could be copyrighted. E4024 (talk) 18:57, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 03:43, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably copyright violation: This photo was taken from the Daily Herald, and there is no indication on that site that it is freely usable. Mysteryman blue 00:05, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I think that the photo is not free. Wikimedia Commons doesn’t accept content without license. It is not tolerated and never will be.Alejitao123 (talk) 18:06, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted per nomination. -- CptViraj (talk) 05:13, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, unused, uncat since 2014. Pibwl (talk) 00:37, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Polarlys (talk) 09:23, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused Flickr photo of a person of unknown notability, sole upload. Pibwl (talk) 00:38, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 09:24, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - distorted photo of a map. Pibwl (talk) 00:41, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, risk of copyright violation of the map, no evidence of permssion. Verbcatcher (talk) 15:42, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 09:24, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused user logo, uploader has no other live global contributions. Out of project scope. ƏXPLICIT 00:57, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per nomination. -- CptViraj (talk) 05:17, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 01:50, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per nomination. -- CptViraj (talk) 05:21, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Although the video is licensed under {{YouTube CC-BY}}, the description reads: "Do not edit. Do not re-upload." This contradicts the CC license and is not free enough to be hosted on Commons.

ƏXPLICIT 03:02, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per nomination. -- CptViraj (talk) 05:28, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by C1K98V as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Various file available on commons for education purpose CptViraj (talk) 07:35, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: low quality penis photo. --Polarlys (talk) 09:22, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:17, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 09:22, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear where the image is located on the website given, but the website has copyright information, no indication of the CC license quoted by the uploader. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 17:21, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 09:22, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo wothout educational use Drakosh (talk) 17:28, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 09:22, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of focus, and we do have images of coke that are in focus Mercurywoodrose (talk) 18:27, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No valid reason for deletion. --Markscheider (talk) 18:45, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Polarlys (talk) 09:20, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image is not in focus. we have images of coke that are in focus that are very similar Mercurywoodrose (talk) 18:28, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 09:20, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - index of some book. Pibwl (talk) 18:36, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 09:20, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It isn't clear that source were free licensed, there isn't any indication of license Ezarateesteban 19:46, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 09:20, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not my own photograph. The photographer of 3D objects has his own rights to photos according to Russian law. — Redboston 20:24, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 09:21, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy from Google Maps Alpöhi (talk) 20:42, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 09:19, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author is not correct. This is not "own work", but copied from https://www.vlaamsbelang.org/. MichielDMN (talk) 20:52, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 09:19, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File was previously used under the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic license, but has since become copyrighted on Flickr. UnLeashedWolfie (talk) 21:34, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Polarlys (talk) 09:19, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bücherwurmliebe (talk · contribs)

[edit]

New user uploaded images from two different photographers as "own work".

Sitacuisses (talk) 22:31, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 09:18, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo of questionable notability, advertising/ out of scope VLu (talk) 22:57, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 09:18, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poorly made, not used anywhere Ghi3000 (talk) 23:07, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 09:18, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

old photo, scanned without source provided Ezarateesteban 23:17, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 09:16, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bild zeigt falsche Stelle Centraldream (talk) 23:18, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 09:16, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

scanned photo without source provided Ezarateesteban 23:23, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 09:16, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

scanned photo without source photo, collague Ezarateesteban 23:24, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 09:16, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not an own work, scanned photo Ezarateesteban 23:25, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 09:16, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 11:00, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

COM:PACKAGING.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 17:46, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

COM:PACKAGING.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 07:00, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: F3. --1989 (talk) 22:26, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by EddieBurciaga (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons:Derivative works from non-free newspapers and posters.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:16, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 09:40, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cover art for the single "Rose and Faon" (玫瑰与小鹿), no reason to believe it's uploader's own work (identical image from years on the web) Esprit Fugace (talk) 17:26, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, there is a fair-use copy of this image at w:zh:File:Rose and Deer, Zhou Shen 2015 Single.jpg. Its use in the Chinese Wikipedia article w:zh:玫瑰与小鹿 confirms that this is a record cover. Verbcatcher (talk) 20:30, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted per nomination. -- CptViraj (talk) 14:34, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:58, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:56, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, no cat, one of 2 uploads. Pibwl (talk) 17:01, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:56, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

sole advert - out of scope. Pibwl (talk) 17:02, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • There is no rule against advertisements providing they are in scope and have acceptable licenses. This is probably is in scope as an illustration of ecological funeral options. However, the copyright status is unclear so  Delete. Verbcatcher (talk) 19:30, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:55, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope screenshoot, as well as most or all other uploads. Pibwl (talk) 17:03, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:53, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User suggests she is the person in the photo, need information about the photographer and license of the photo. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 17:13, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:52, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Scan from a publication; need information about the source and license of the photo. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 17:15, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:54, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User suggests he is one of the people in the photo; need information about the photographer and license of the photo. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 17:17, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:54, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot, unlikely to be own work by uploader Esprit Fugace (talk) 17:30, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete risk of copyright violation, on web pages dated before upload here.[10][11] Looks like a publicity photo. Verbcatcher (talk) 20:03, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:50, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, unused. Pibwl (talk) 00:28, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete The photo is not a good quality, and is not a good idea to keep it here.Alejitao123 (talk) 18:09, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:31, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 01:41, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:29, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 01:43, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:29, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 01:45, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:29, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low res, out of scope Minoraxtalk 01:47, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:29, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine

VLu (talk) 07:27, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:27, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Metadata says it is copyrighted to DND-MND Canada and that it was taken by Corporal Rick Ayer. The copyright notice in the metadata links to [12], which prohibits commercial use. DrKay (talk) 08:12, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; likely flickrwashing. --Gbawden (talk) 09:28, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Given the uploader's questionable uploads (see User talk:BNLX), I doubt this is their "own work". The file name "Insta8.jpg" has no direct relation to the subject, and perhaps this photo was taken from Instagram. Since no immediate results were found via Google Images and TinEye (as of this writing), a deletion request (for some discussion) is made. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:28, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:26, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

taken from some internet page Euro know (talk) 09:55, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope. --Gbawden (talk) 09:26, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

zero educational value; subject not visible. Kotofey2016 (talk) 10:09, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:25, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

taken from here Euro know (talk) 10:20, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:25, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope and copied from facebook. Rocky Masum (talk) 10:31, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is in scope as it is a picture of a school, moreover its description indicates that this is a listed monument in Bangladesh. However,  Delete as a possible copyright violation, because this image was uploaded to Facebook before its upload here.[13] Verbcatcher (talk) 16:33, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Taken from FB, needs OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 09:25, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Blurry Lalasid (talk) 10:34, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope. --Gbawden (talk) 09:24, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Artwork whose autor, Edward Hopper - American, 1882-1967 died before 1950

JotaCartas (talk) 10:44, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:23, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused Flickr photo of unidentified person, no cat since 2012. Pibwl (talk) 10:46, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:23, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crocoduck, not free and was proposed by Ray Comfort and Kirk Cameron. Eatcha (talk) 10:52, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It is unlikely that Comfort and Cameron have a valid copyright over the concept of a duck/crocodile chimera. However,  Delete as a probable copyright violation because this image is was uploaded to Twitter before its upload here.[14] Verbcatcher (talk) 17:06, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:21, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of a copyrighted advertisement. Yuraily Lic (talk) 10:53, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:21, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I fail to see how a 2006 publication can be free from all restrictions, or be PD. (I think this it was marked as such based on the 1919 date for the start of the series this was taken from. Would suggest a review of other years (and possibly other post 1964 publcations from the relevant Flikr stream as well.)

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:53, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Certainly not PD; even if all the authors dropped dead while the journal was on the press, their Canadian copyrights wouldn’t expire until 2057.—Odysseus1479 (talk) 22:11, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:21, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I fail to see how a 2005 publication can be free from all restrictions, or be PD. (I think this it was marked as such based on the 1919 date for the start of the series this was taken from. Would suggest a review of other years (and possibly other post 1964 publications from the relevant Flikr stream as well.)

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:54, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Certainly not PD; even if all the authors dropped dead while the journal was on the press, their Canadian copyrights wouldn’t expire until 2056.—Odysseus1479 (talk) 22:10, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:20, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of a copyrighted signboard. Yuraily Lic (talk) 10:55, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:20, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

flickr photo, doesn't seem to be in scope, uncat since 2012. Pibwl (talk) 10:56, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:18, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

flickr photo, doesn't seem to be in scope, uncat since 2012. Pibwl (talk) 10:57, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:18, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

flickr photo, doesn't seem to be in scope, uncat since 2014. Pibwl (talk) 10:59, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:18, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

dark photo of T-shirt on some guy from flickr, doesn't seem to be in scope, uncat since 2013.. Pibwl (talk) 11:02, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, risk of copyright violation of the t-shirt design. Verbcatcher (talk) 17:39, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:17, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused flickr photo of a person of unknown notability, uncat since 2013. Pibwl (talk) 11:04, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:17, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"artistic" flickr photo of unknown subject, doesn't seem to be in scope, uncat since 2014 - same for File:Leica Moments (15631021377).jpg.. Pibwl (talk) 11:05, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy keep, the photographer is Christopher Michel, on whom there is a Wikipedia article. Verbcatcher (talk) 17:41, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: This is one of those times where artistic merit trumps. And by a notable photographer so could realistically be used by anyone interested in his work. --Gbawden (talk) 09:16, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author Ksado (†1972) . HombreDHojalata.talk 11:09, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(I am the uploader) --. HombreDHojalata.talk 11:45, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Courtesy deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:09, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

flickr photo, no useful description, doesn't seem to be in scope, uncat. Pibwl (talk) 11:09, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Can be added to a cat like people reading text messages etc. --Gbawden (talk) 09:09, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - photo as a background for some thoughts. Pibwl (talk) 11:11, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete because of risk of copyright violation, the author shown in metadata does not match the claimed author. Verbcatcher (talk) 17:46, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:14, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

dark photo showing not identified persons, no real educational use, uncat since 2014. Pibwl (talk) 11:18, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep This image shows an events of the british Foreign and Commonwealth Office, so real educational value and darkness can be edited. Tm (talk) 13:03, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment the persons are not even named... Pibwl (talk) 15:39, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Not relevant to this deletion request. In scope. Tm (talk) 16:29, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Poor quality is a reason to delete. We don't have to keep every photo regardless of quality just because the source is notable. --Gbawden (talk) 09:10, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

flickr "artistic" photo, doesn't seem to be in scope, uncat. Pibwl (talk) 11:23, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep artistic is not a reason to delete and photo is clearly in scope. Tm (talk) 12:58, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep, insufficient rationale for deletion. Verbcatcher (talk) 18:28, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:06, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

flickr "artistic" photo, no useful description, out of scope, uncat. Pibwl (talk) 11:25, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:05, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

flickr unused photo, out of scope, uncat. Pibwl (talk) 11:31, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep, logo of Piper Aircraft on what is presumably their promotional product. This logo is allowed under COM:TOO US. Verbcatcher (talk) 18:35, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:05, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The given source (Twitter) does not say anything about CC license 92.213.12.231 11:31, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:03, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Flickr photo, unknown subject, low-res, doesn't seem to be in scope. Pibwl (talk) 11:32, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:05, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

distorted flickr photo, doesn't seem to be in a scope, uncat since 2014. Pibwl (talk) 11:45, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:03, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

partly obscured flickr cat photo, out of scope. Pibwl (talk) 11:54, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Weak delete, no clear education use, we have plenty of pictures in Category:Black cats. Verbcatcher (talk) 15:14, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:01, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

flickr photo, doesn't seem to be in a scope, uncat since 2013. Pibwl (talk) 11:55, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Unsure, this is in scope in relation to a TEDx event, however it is unclear whether the arrangement of rectangles is copyrightable under COM:TOO Denmark. Verbcatcher (talk) 18:52, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; I don't see an EDUSE. --Gbawden (talk) 09:01, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

somebody's back, doesn't seem to be in a scope, uncat since 2013. Pibwl (talk) 11:55, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:01, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

obscured dog flickr photo, doesn't seem to be in a scope. Pibwl (talk) 11:56, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:01, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - simple inscription, along with rest of uploads File:Elbe 2.png, File:Outzone.png. Pibwl (talk) 15:34, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:00, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused "logo" of questionable notability. Johnj1995 (talk) 16:22, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:00, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Erica Fornasari (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:27, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:59, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

please check all images of this user Albinfo (talk) 16:30, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:59, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:52, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:58, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lorenzo Di bona (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:53, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:58, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot from TV? Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 17:29, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Personal photo by non-contributor. --Wdwd (talk) 13:20, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I fail to see how a 2004 publication can be free from all restrictions, or be PD. (I think this it was marked as such based on the 1893 (?) date for the start of the series this was taken from. Would suggest a review of other years (and possibly other post 1964 publications from the relevant Flikr stream as well.)

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 23:37, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 Comment These appear to be from 1893. The 2004 seems to be the volume number not a year Gbawden (talk) 08:52, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I checked the linked PDF- https://archive.org/stream/bulletinofbriti124125brit/#page/n6/mode/1up which has a 2004 date. The 1893 date appears to be when the journal started publishing. This 'confusion' between the dtae fo the first issue of a journal, and the volume date is a known issue with some meta-data, hence why volumes were being reviewed as part of the IA books harmonization effort @: as uploader.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:25, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, 2004 is the correct date in this case. --Gbawden (talk) 11:29, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Duplicate. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

EugeneZelenko I asked for this logo personally. The person who sent me the picture told me I have the permissions to upload it, thanks.


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:40, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - no educational use, uncat since 2014. Pibwl (talk) 00:24, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Per the link in the image this was an event to "review of the balance of competences will be an audit of what the EU does and how it affects the UK" that given the context of a arcane and obscure thing called Brexit is important. Tm (talk) 19:41, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion.  JGHowes  talk 14:55, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, unused Flickr photo, uncat. Pibwl (talk) 00:30, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Not used not reason to delete. In scope of sleeping and siesta. Tm (talk) 13:52, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep I think that photos will be useful for the future, even if they are not used.Alejitao123 (talk) 18:02, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment E402, do you know what is an siesta (in spanish) or sesta (in portuguese) to make the comment above? Is it a costume in your country of birth and\or residence? In my country (Portugal) is a good representation of siesta or sesta, mainly on the southern part. Tm (talk) 15:38, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion.  JGHowes  talk 14:57, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doesn't seem to be in a scope, unused Flickr photo, uncat. Pibwl (talk) 00:30, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Weak keep, may be useful as an illustration of the eyeshine effect. I have added it to Category:Eyeshine (cats). Verbcatcher (talk) 09:49, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Per Verbcatcher. Tm (talk) 13:53, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion.  JGHowes  talk 14:58, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, unused Flickr photo, uncat. Pibwl (talk) 00:35, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion.  JGHowes  talk 14:59, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright belongs to the police, not the Flickr user Ytoyoda (talk) 03:42, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination.  JGHowes  talk 15:02, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo with copyright Yogwi21 (talk) 09:33, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination.  JGHowes  talk 15:03, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - unused aviation museum advert with Amelia, of whom we have many photographs, uncat since 2014. Pibwl (talk) 09:40, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Per your own words this is an advert of the Pearl Harbor Aviation Museum and so is clearly in scope. Tm (talk) 13:45, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep in scope as publicity material from a museum. Copyright looks ok as this is from the Museum's Flickr account. Verbcatcher (talk) 17:37, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion, re-review of Flickr confirms valid Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic free license.  JGHowes  talk 15:05, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

taken from some internet page Euro know (talk) 09:56, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

See also: Commons:Deletion requests/File:חידת טריוויה מתוך האתר.png Euro know (talk) 21:12, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination.  JGHowes  talk 15:08, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a work of US Gov, 1955 publication by a Canadian museum. I fail to see how this could be PD in the US or Canada. ( See also the subcat dated 1961)

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:56, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete According to frWP the first author died in 1979, so his Canadian copyrights don’t expire until 2030. (I can‘t find a date for the second, but FWIW he appears to have been alive in 1976.) The ROM is now an agency of the Ontario government (so I guess would publish under Crown copyright), but before 1968 it was part of the University of Toronto.—Odysseus1479 (talk) 22:56, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination.  JGHowes  talk 15:09, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mexican money from 1993. Aurelio de Sandoval (talk) 17:28, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted. Post-1928 banknotes of Mexico are under copyright. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:51, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mexican money from 1993. Aurelio de Sandoval (talk) 17:29, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. Post-1928 banknotes of Mexico are under copyright. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:51, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

person of unknown notability, unused, low-res Flickr photo. Pibwl (talk) 00:25, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete per nom. (If you oppose this DR please do not direct nonsense accusations to me about people's skin colour etc. I did not open the discussion and I give support to the rationale which says "person of unknown notability, unused, low-res Flickr photo." Let us please discuss everything, but with respect towards each other.) --E4024 (talk) 02:02, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept, nothing requiring deletion, of some possible use. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:01, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright infringement. User Teossmoam uploaded three images with different authors on Commons (Diego Silva, Derick Roney and Tiago Silva), this one being signed by Diego Silva.

View:

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Frota_E_Metro_SP.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Frota-p-metro.jpg Sorocabano 32 (talk) 02:06, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per nom; no explanation for conflicting authorship claims. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:05, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright infringement. User Teossmoam uploaded three images with different authors on Commons (Diego Silva, Derick Roney and Thiago Silva), this one being signed by Thiago Silva (https://plamurbblog.wordpress.com/2019/08/29/o-que-mudou-na-linha-5-lilas-apos-o-primeiro-ano-sob-operacao-da-viamobilidade/).

View: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Frota-c-metro.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Frota_E_Metro_SP.jpg Sorocabano 32 (talk) 02:08, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per nom; no explanation for conflicting authorship claims. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:05, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright infringement. User Teossmoam uploaded three images with different authors on Commons (Diego Silva, Derick Roney and Thiago Silva), this one being signed by Derick Roney.

View: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Frota-c-metro.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Frota-p-metro.jpg Sorocabano 32 (talk) 02:09, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted per nom; no explanation for conflicting authorship claims. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:05, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These publications are incorrectly dated as 1919 at the Internet Archive (which often fails to accurately date volumes of periodicals), yet are all published from 1988 onwards. The Biodiversity Heritage Library summary page states all volumes are "In copyright. Digitized with the permission of the rights holder." and made available under a non-commercial Creative Commons license (by-nc-sa-4.0). The Golden Gate Audubon Society is not a U.S. federal or state government agency.

--Animalparty (talk) 03:31, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted per nom. Incorrect info on Internet Archive; publications date 1980s through 2012, not pre-1926 as claimed copyright status. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:11, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of a copyrighted signboard. No FoP in Japan for 2D works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 09:58, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted per nom -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:32, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

pizza menu, doesn't seem to be in a scope, uncat since 2013. Pibwl (talk) 11:48, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per nom; also apparent DW. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:37, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photo is unlikely to be own work as stated, since the subject died on 1998, and the photo is already published elsewhere online such as here, here. There's also a black & white version here. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:11, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Support Looks like an official portrait from the 60s. --Спас Колев (talk) 09:21, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted per nom; false claims, false license -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:46, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Duplicate. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:03, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per nom -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:46, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cover of a copyrighted magazine. No permission from copyright owner (http://www.politika.rs) Smooth O (talk) 16:07, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per nom; false claims. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:47, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I fail to see how a 2004 publication can be free from all restrictions, or be PD. (I think this it was marked as such based on the 1919 date for the start of the series this was taken from. Would suggest a review of other years (and possibly other post 1964 publications from the relevant Flikr stream as well.)

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 23:32, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Certainly not PD; even if all the authors dropped dead while the journal was on the press, their Canadian copyrights wouldn’t expire until 2055.—Odysseus1479 (talk) 22:11, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   04:25, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a 2004 publication of Canadian origin, and previous issues of this journal have been deleted for copyright reasons. It's clealry not a work of US Gov.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:58, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   04:25, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I fail to see how a 2008 publication can be free from all restrictions, or be PD. (I think this it was marked as such based on the date for the start of the series this was taken from. Would suggest a review of other years (and possibly other post 1964 publications from the relevant Flikr stream as well.)

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 23:39, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Procedural close - All files in request seemingly deleted without discussion. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:58, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Greece A1Cafel (talk) 02:33, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 03:57, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Greece A1Cafel (talk) 02:32, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 07:13, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Greece A1Cafel (talk) 02:32, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 07:14, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Greece A1Cafel (talk) 02:32, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 07:14, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Greece A1Cafel (talk) 02:32, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 07:14, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Greece A1Cafel (talk) 02:32, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 07:14, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Greece A1Cafel (talk) 02:32, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 07:14, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Greece A1Cafel (talk) 02:32, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 07:14, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Greece A1Cafel (talk) 02:33, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 07:16, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Greece A1Cafel (talk) 02:33, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 07:16, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Azerbaijan Ray Garraty (talk) 13:27, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep/Oppose - Incorrect rationale presented - COM:FOP Azerbaijan states that "The reproduction, or public communication of architectural works, photographic works and works of fine art permanently located in a public place shall be permissible without the author's or other copyright owner’s consent and without paying author’s remuneration". Deleting images such as this would also be highly problematic in general. It would first of all create a precedent for the mass removal of pictures depicting buildings in Nagorno-Karabakh. The town in question, Mets Tagher, has been captured by Azerbaijan during the 2020 Nagorno-Karabakh war and has been emptied of its Armenian population and this picture represent a historical snapshot into the town before these events. AntonSamuel (talk) 17:26, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete @AntonSamuel: you overlooked something at COM:FOP Azerbaijan. It is for noncommercial purposes only. It is not allowed to reuse images of artworks and architecture created or designed by still-living people (architects/sculptors etc.) or people who have been dead for less than 70 years, if the purpose is for commercial media like post cards and calendars. This is contrary to Commons:Licensing#Acceptable licenses. Permission from the sculptor (or his heir if he/she is already deceased) is required for it to be hosted here. Or better still, lobby for an amendment/change in copyright law of the country to remove noncommercial restriction for images of copyrighted architecture and sculptures. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:15, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


@JWilz12345: In what way would you say its current use is considered commercial? AntonSamuel (talk) 08:09, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@AntonSamuel: there is no issue about current use, but Commons policy also considers the future use. See also Commons:Licensing#Acceptable licenses. It states that files must be freely reusable for any purposes, including use on post cards, calendars, commercial T-shirt prints, and commercial online vlogs. For the case of images of architecture and sculptures, that means no need to ask for formal permission from the architects, sculptors, or their heirs for every reuse of the images on commercial and/or new media like the ones I mentioned above. Unfortunately, copyrighted works (whose architects or sculptors just died recently or are still living) have copyright durations ranging from 50 (Philippines) to 70 (Azerbaijan and most European countries). Fortunately, countries like Germany, Poland, Armenia, Turkey, and Singapore have freedom of panorama provisions that guarantees photographers, publishers, and online reusers free uses of images of copyrighted architectural and sculptural works without the need of permission from the works' creators or their heirs within the work's duration of copyright. FOP also removes photographers, publishers, and online reusers the burden of paying royalties to the heirs of the architects and/or sculptors. Architectural FOP is only recognized in a dozen countries like USA, Japan, Russia, Denmark, and Syria (while sculptures and other works are not covered by FOP). No FOP, unfortunately, for dozens of countries like ours (the Philippines), France, Greece, UAE, and unfortunately, Azerbaijan. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:27, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
AntonSamuel see also the statuses at File:Freedom of Panorama world map.svg. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:28, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The disputed nature of the Nagorno-Karabakh region, and the lack of Azerbaijani law imposed on the region at the time of the building of the monument as well as at the time the picture was taken - coupled with the issues I've raised in my previous post puts that interpretation into question I would argue. AntonSamuel (talk) 09:41, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Disputed or not, the region in question is recognized as being part of Azerbaijan, so its FOP provisions prevail. ƏXPLICIT 02:58, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The wax statue was photographed at Madame Tussaud’s in New York City, not London. There is no freedom of panorama for three-dimensional works in the United States. Ytoyoda (talk) 01:58, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 04:53, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of a copyrighted signboard. No FoP in Japan for 2D works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 12:15, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:08, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per NoFoP-Russia — Redboston 20:32, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:38, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fehlerhaftes Upload H. Krisp (talk) 08:37, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: author request. --ƏXPLICIT 01:18, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, apparently autopromotion, unknown notability. Pibwl (talk) 10:52, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • In scope because the man shown is the CEO of Cybage, on which there is a Wikipedia article. However  Delete due to risk of copyright violation, because the author shown in the metadata does not match the declared author. Verbcatcher (talk) 16:41, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep, I have changed by mind. Notwithstanding the conflicting metadata, this was posted to Cybage's Flickr account with a free license. Cybage is a major company and we should normally accept their copyright declarations. Verbcatcher (talk) 16:49, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --ƏXPLICIT 01:17, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

flickr photo of anonymous person, doesn't seem to be in scope, uncat. Pibwl (talk) 11:21, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep, potentially useful as a illustration of gluttony and possibly competitive eating. Verbcatcher (talk) 17:49, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --ƏXPLICIT 01:16, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING. Yuraily Lic (talk) 12:01, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:24, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING. Yuraily Lic (talk) 12:01, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:25, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING. Yuraily Lic (talk) 12:03, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:25, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photograph of a photograph, unidentified person, apart from copyright doubts - one of few uploads. Pibwl (talk) 13:59, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, the halftone patterning indicates this is a copy of printed material, possibly from a magazine or a poster. Verbcatcher (talk) 19:03, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:27, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unencyclopedic Iketsi (talk) 15:09, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:12, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Person on this photo is obviously not the author as claimed. 2A01:CB1D:8B7A:5400:7095:178F:8518:9AF9 15:39, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:26, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader suggests he is the person in the photo, need information about the photographer and license of the photo. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 17:58, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:22, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derived from this file. The uploader Георгий Долгопский admitted that he is not the author of the photo. The photographer of 3D objects has his own rights to photos according to Russian law. — Redboston 20:00, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:19, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a photo that I (Thomas Soerenes) uploaded to Flickr in 2013 of my then girlfriend, now wife, Alex Devine. I uploaded it not knowing the meaning behind Creative Commons. This photo, along with many of my other photos, was quickly uploaded by User:Russavia to Wikimedia. While not in wide use, this photo of my wife is now being used on wiki pages that reference an adult film acress with the same name. This is highly disturbing. This is a private photo that I never meant to upload and it is certainly not a photo of an adult film actress. Please help me by deleting this photo. I do not care about my other photos being uploaded by User:Russavia, but this one is being used in hurtful ways. My email is [email protected] if you have any questions. Thank you. 73.181.247.169 17:00, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete by courtesy. --Achim (talk) 18:01, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Unsure, at face value this is a reasonable request for a courtesy deletion. However, there is a clear resemblance between the woman in this photo and the woman in File:Alex Devine.jpg, including the shape of her chin. A Google image search for 'Alex Devine porn star' comes up with a similar face (alongside NSFW images). Verbcatcher (talk) 18:14, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: for privacy reasons. Deleted on flickr, not in use, DR confirmed by author per email. --Achim (talk) 09:46, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Ukraine Andrei (talk) 13:31, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 12:59, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per {{NoFoP-Russia}}Redboston 20:35, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 12:20, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad route of the railway line - This is where the railway line from Zebrzydowice to Cieszyn should be. Thnnf (talk) 16:39, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That's a reason for correction, not deletion.--Darwinek (talk) 01:45, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Let someone correct it, so far it is useless since it contains errors. Map containing errors should be deleted. --31.0.26.199 05:14, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This railway did not exist when it would be most important in 1919, and I used the same background for the map of the war in 1919. D T G (talk) 17:00, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's not important that railway did not exist when it would be most important in 1919. Map shows bad route of the railway line, we either delete the line or correct it.--95.41.131.64 03:31, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Feel free to correct it or replace usage with a correct map. Ankry (talk) 16:08, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ankry (talk) 16:09, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per {{NoFoP-Russia}}Redboston 20:35, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 05:23, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per {{NoFoP-Russia}}Redboston 20:35, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 05:24, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very similar to (and a redundant file of) File:8115Poblacion, Baliuag, Bulacan 41.jpg. The only few difference is half an inch distance between the camera and the subject, and this is leaning towards becoming a duplicate file of the said file. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:59, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 11:28, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant to, and nearly identical file of, File:8115Poblacion, Baliuag, Bulacan 49.jpg. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:02, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 11:28, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

blurred photo of no educational use. Pibwl (talk) 11:00, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 11:29, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR referral for 2 reasons. 1 This is claimed as PD-US-Gov, but it's not immediately possible to determine this from the metadata or the work. 2. These appear to be handwritten notes. Were these actually ever published?

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:00, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 Keep Withdrawn Identified as sifieldbooks collection item. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:01, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Nominator withdrawn. --Minoraxtalk 11:30, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, unused, no cat. Pibwl (talk) 12:47, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In scope as an illustration of a software mechanism.  Delete as a screenshot of non-free software (by SAP[15]), see COM:SCREENSHOT. Verbcatcher (talk) 19:00, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per Verbcatcher. --Minoraxtalk 11:34, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope and/or book scan, sole upload. Pibwl (talk) 15:33, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Clearly in scope as it shows en:Mirabal sisters in a collage of File:25 de noviembre día de la no violencia contra la mujer.jpg, kept in Commons:Deletion requests/File:25 de noviembre día de la no violencia contra la mujer.jpg and the cover of the book "en:In the Time of the Butterflies. However, as the book is from 1994, this is in copyright in all of the world (or at least the great majority). The other two images, the unidentified image of an butterfly and an image of text are probably from the same book, so  Delete. Tm (talk) 16:43, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete incorporates a non-free book cover.[16] The butterfly image may also be in copyright. Verbcatcher (talk) 19:13, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 11:34, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poster of a theatre play. No permission from copyright owner (https://www.pozoriste-slavija.co.rs/) Smooth O (talk) 16:10, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Permission available. --Minoraxtalk 11:35, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:10, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 11:35, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:13, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 11:35, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Irrelevant Centraldream (talk) 23:12, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minoraxtalk 11:35, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Has the watermark of a photographer, who does not appear to be the uploader; no metadata. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 18:24, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:39, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Has a copyright mark, does not appear to be the uploader, Facebook mark in the metadata. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 18:25, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:39, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ytoyoda as no permission (No permission since). i believe the flickr user is the wikipedia uploader because (1) they identify themselves as Ingo; (2) the wikipedia ingo edits articles on enwiki and dewiki in a pattern that would fit the flickr ingo's life. as such we can assume with confidence the flickr photographer uploaded his own photo to wiki. Roy17 (talk) 12:23, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per Roy17's keep rationale, Ytoyoda's retraction, and Commons:Grandfathered old files. —RP88 (talk) 12:05, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy of: https://www.reddit.com/r/pics/comments/9jsc0/sim_city_anyone_i_found_this_while_cleaning_my/ Image unlikely to have been uploaded by the same person. Johnj1995 (talk) 17:36, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete Unlikely to be the same person. The uploader's other uploads are also files found on the internet rather than true own work (being submitted for deletion separately). -M.nelson (talk) 22:03, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 05:10, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file either does not depict who it claims to, or is of a non-notable person whose articles on several Wikipedias have been deleted as a hoax. A search for the named individual and a reverse image search did not resolve the issue. The other images of this individual have recently been deleted (File:LollieMDDinner.JPG, File:LollieD.PNG, File:Lollie Alexi Devereaux 6989.PNG). There are unsubstantiated rumors ([17][18][19]) about this person's relationship to Jared Padalecki. I think the safest route is to delete this image. gobonobo + c 20:07, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment As much is I understand, the nomination wants to say, that depicted person is non-notable. en:Lollie Alexi Devereaux was really twice deleted, but there exists an article in arz.wiki. Accusations of hoax are totally unsubstantiated and can be dismissed. Taivo (talk) 08:52, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, all articles deleted (except on arz, a nearly inactive wp with 0 depth!). --P 1 9 9   19:28, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unusable sketch → out of scope. Better version is File:Harmonie_der_Streckenteilung_Reinzeichnung.jpg Jahobr (talk) 10:29, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:25, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope flickr photo. Pibwl (talk) 11:12, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep, in scope, English Wikipedia has an article on the Marshall Scholarship. Verbcatcher (talk) 18:24, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete You guys are clutching at straws. Marshall Scholarships are in scope but a lanyard with their logo? and not a straight lanyard at that. I don't see an EDUSE Gbawden (talk) 09:08, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete out of scope Lexy iris (talk) 19:09, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep. Ah, the deletionist crowd is here in force. -- Tuválkin 13:51, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    So is a crowd of users trying to prove a point, that my requests are wrong :) You didn't argue why it is supposed to be in Commons scope, however. I agree, that in several cases I was apparently wrong, but I can't imagine educational use of this peculiar photo in any article. But you probably surprise me :) As you(?) pointed in other place, some users are working upon enhancing a repository of free photographs, and I admire that - but my work, apart from occasional adding properly categorized photographs and categorizing existing material, is to report orphaned photographs which I consider useless, so they can be discussed upon. Anyway, I promise to be more cautious and leave more photographs without taking any action, so that somebody can identify them in the future. Pibwl (talk) 19:15, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, per User:Gbawden. --P 1 9 9   15:29, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

partly blurred flickr photo of unidentified loction (and rather impossible to identify), without helpful description, uncat since 2014. Pibwl (talk) 11:47, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep the selective blurring is presumably deliberate. This is an example of the miniature faking photographic technique, and could be used to illustrate it. I have added it to Category:Tilt-shift miniature faking. Verbcatcher (talk) 18:44, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:Verbcatcher. --P 1 9 9   15:30, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

obscured anonymous pesons from random meeting, doesn't seem to be in a scope, uncat since 2013. Pibwl (talk) 11:57, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Instead of opening this DR, if Pibwl lost a moment to see the flickr album he would see that this is not a "random meeting" but a "meeting with entrepreneurs" and not "anonymous pesons" but Valdis Dombrovskis, "only" Executive Vice President of the European Commission for An Economy that Works for People, former European Commissioner for Trade, former European Commissioner for Financial Stability, Financial Services and the Capital Markets Union, former Prime Minister of Latvia and Minister of Finance of Latvia. Tm (talk) 12:57, 13 December 2020 (UTC) Clearly not obscured and anonymous. Tm (talk) 12:57, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Still obscured by the blinds. Why a candid photo? No real educational use anyway IMO. If original uploader was so kind to add a proper category, I wouldn't find this photo, while browsing uncategorized images - for 7 years. Pibwl (talk) 15:38, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Dont change the rationale when it is proven that this are not a random event and anonymous people. Not being categorized is not a reason to delete, but several nominations and then make other loose time (20 seconds in this case) to find out who he was is a clear reason to call this a sloopy nomination. Tm (talk) 16:27, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep, photo of a notable person, per Tm. Verbcatcher (talk) 18:16, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Photo of notable person, could be used in an article about them or their institution(s). -M.nelson (talk) 22:18, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per above. --P 1 9 9   15:33, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Klive Owen (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible copyright violation. Person in photo died in 2007.

Maxinvestigator (talk) 16:09, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Photo provided by dead person's daughter to replace initial photo taken from the gravestone. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Klive Owen (talk • contribs) 18:20, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Who made this photo? Maxinvestigator (talk) 13:00, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:33, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be an original image. Already used on this website from 2006: https://web.stanford.edu/group/parasites/ParaSites2006/Gastrodiscoidiasis/gastro.htm Johnj1995 (talk) 16:14, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:33, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

nothing uses this file anymore, uploaded SVG version with proper colors at File:Firma TEC.svg Roqz (talk) 16:16, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:34, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

nothing uses this file anymore, uploaded SVG version with proper colors at File:Firma TEC.svg Roqz (talk) 16:54, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:35, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope, no educational value Andrei (talk) 19:56, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination (borderline: no clear focus/poor composition). --P 1 9 9   15:36, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope, no educational value Andrei (talk) 19:57, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: certainly in scope. --P 1 9 9   15:35, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Irrelevant, bitte löschen Centraldream (talk) 23:15, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Warum irrelevant? --Polarlys (talk) 09:17, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion. --P 1 9 9   15:41, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bild doppelt vorhanden Centraldream (talk) 23:16, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Duplikat von? --Polarlys (talk) 09:17, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per User:M.nelson. --P 1 9 9   15:38, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seigneurs de Pons.svg Baptiste de Lusignan (talk) 23:43, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:44, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seigneurs de Pons.svg Baptiste de Lusignan (talk) 23:45, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:44, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Raoul Ier d'Exoudun.svg Baptiste de Lusignan (talk) 23:47, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:44, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seigneurs de Fougères.svg Baptiste de Lusignan (talk) 23:54, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

subst:delete2|image=File:Fougères sgr.jpg|reason=Seigneurs de Fougères.svg--Baptiste de Lusignan (talk) 23:24, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: alternate version not found. --P 1 9 9   15:46, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

nouveau visuel en ligne en svg : Yolande de Lusignan, dame de Fougères.svg / visuel inutilisé. Baptiste de Lusignan (talk) 21:59, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per self-nomination, superseded by File:Yolande de Lusignan, dame de Fougères.svg. --P 1 9 9   19:49, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doesn't seem to be in a scope - uncat since 2014, as well as File:Rueda de Prensa Caso Valija Diplomática (6824607992).jpg, File:Rueda de Prensa Caso Valija Diplomática (6970729119).jpg, File:Rueda de Prensa Caso Valija Diplomática (6970730603).jpg, File:Rueda de Prensa Caso Valija Diplomática (6970732083).jpg - a bunch of invoices or documents.: Pibwl (talk) 00:27, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment An illegible scan of an invoice? In scope? really? Gbawden (talk) 09:32, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and Gbawden. Bad quality and not used in the projects per Commons:Deletion_policy#Redundant/bad_quality. --Elly (talk) 22:14, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

flickr photo of unknown subject, no useful description, doesn't seem to be in scope, uncat. Pibwl (talk) 11:08, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not talking about the logo, but about the construction. Pibwl (talk) 15:43, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Dont change the goals. Logos are clearly identified and the event is clearly easy to find. Tm (talk) 16:39, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
So an photo of the presence of European Space Agency and the German Aerospace Center in the International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium 2012 is out of scope? Good to know how narrow some people see what is educational useful. Tm (talk) 04:14, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and arguments in discussion. In addition this version of the ESA logo is possibly copyrighted, this is not present in Category:ESA logos. Not used since 2012 on the projects. --Elly (talk) 22:20, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Depicted person died in 1933. Is the license really correct? How do you know, that the artist is 70 years dead? In addition, here is no acceptable source. Depicted person lived in Poland and if the photo was ever published in Poland, then it is free, but this needs evidence. Taivo (talk) 16:45, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is the original passport photo of Chofetz Chaim. It's the only photo ever to which he submitted to willingly. This version is the original one, among myriads of retouched version on the web. It is a unique and precious document, removing it will help perpetuate the retouched versions. It was *widely* published throughout Europe, as it was the only available picture of him. Also, you can see the Jewish book editors like Artscroll, Feldheim and other use this picture and its retouched versions on their book covers (for example: "A lesson a day (Artscroll/Mesorah)"). In conclusion, removing it is a total disservice. Sorry I don't know how to stamp my username etc. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 186.189.238.46 (talk) 18:32, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

But we need correct license. There are multiple potentially correct licenses, but any license needs evidence of being correct. Without evidence the photo must be deleted. Taivo (talk) 10:37, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nominationAnd discussion. Much used image. To avoid empty images I changed the image on the Wikidata item and on an often used template for rabbi stubs on en:Wikipedia. Shall be in PD and can be safely undeleted in 1933+120=2053 or earlier when the date of the passport photo would be known. . --Elly (talk) 22:42, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation; built in 1976 – cotemporary artworks; no freedom of panorama. Martin Sg. (talk) 20:39, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Elly (talk) 22:43, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

coat of arms, own work, uploader has copyright? Ezarateesteban 23:02, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. unclear copyright situation, per COM:PRP. --Elly (talk) 22:47, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

logo or coat of arm, free licensed? uploader is owner of copyright? Ezarateesteban 23:03, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Relatively recent coat of arm of the Ice Hockey team of Slovakia. Per Commons:Copyright_rules_by_subject_matter#Coats_of_arms this cannot be used on commons, even if the design is fairly simple. --Elly (talk) 23:01, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio: comments and preface are copyrighted by А. Сідарэвіч (d:Q6463567), who was born in 1948. Jarash (talk) 23:34, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Clearly copyrighted. --Elly (talk) 22:57, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a Work of US Gov, 1975 publication of Canadian origin. Was there a US notice or renewal for this?

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:50, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete The question of US notice or renewal is irrelevant as long as they are protected in the country of origin. Even if it were a Canadian government publication (which it isn’t, although some of the editors & contributors were likely government employees) the Crown copyright wouldn’t expire until 2026. In fact most of the authors‘ copyrights will last much longer than that.—Odysseus1479 (talk) 22:24, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


  •  Info Examining https://www.canadianfieldnaturalist.ca/index.php/cfn/about, articles over 1 year old are "freely available" and on their site they state that all over 8 years old are freely available at BHL. As at BHL the run is shown as out of copyright which is confusing, but at each journal-level they have their own copyright status. The example volume here is displayed as by-nc-sa so unsuitable for Commons. The mass upload relied on IA publication date and unfortunately the less well-used IA metadata field "Possible copyright status" does say it's in copyright. A general deletion of all CFNs before 1922 would not be unreasonable based on what I see at BHL. -- (talk) 10:19, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per above. --P 1 9 9   18:58, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a work of US Gov. PDF has a 1949 copyright note saying it's Copyright to the museum that issued it. (See also the subcats to the main category).

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:56, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. "Copyright American Museum of Natural History. Materials in this collection are made available for personal, non-commercial, and educational use. Images and text may not be used for any commercial purposes without prior written permission from the American Museum of Natural History.". —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:15, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a work by US Gov? 1926 publication by Putnam or by the NY Zoological society? Undelete in 2-3 years time?

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:00, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Undelete in 2022. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:22, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The PDF is dated 1945, but the images 1951. It seems to be a book published by McGraw hill for the museum concerned. Not convinced it's a work of US Gov, given the publisher, so the query would be whether theere was a renewal or notice given.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:50, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well this is certainly surprising. I didn't realize until now the dates are incongruous indeed, even though I passed through the Oviraptor holotype file several times. Now that you have listed the files, I'm noticing that there's a file depicting an egg from the original Oviraptor nest, a little bit touching to lose them. I haven't been able to find any major or relevant info related to whether there was a notice or the copyright was renewed, so I don't know how we should proceed. PaleoNeolitic (talk) 16:05, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Nothing found at Stanford under this title, so probably {{PD-US-not-renewed}}. The book actually says (on the 8th page of the PDF) that it’s the second edition, © both 1945 and 1951, so I guess the earlier date would have been for the first edition.—Odysseus1479 (talk) 21:49, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment This illustration[20] can also be found in sources from 1914[21] and 1911[22], so shouldn't be deleted with the rest. Maybe there are more cases like it above. But how to mark it as older than that publication? FunkMonk (talk) 23:32, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • The link to archive.org says "Copyright American Museum of Natural History. Materials in this collection are made available for personal, non-commercial, and educational use. Images and text may not be used for any commercial purposes without prior written permission from the American Museum of Natural History" so original images in the book shouldn't be uploaded here Dunkleosteus77 (talk) 20:39, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Yes, they do make that claim, but if the copyright has actually expired due to lack of renewal, the AMNH is no longer in a position to set conditions on reuse of the work, and we are free to ignore them—just as we can ignore Getty et al. when they claim rights over PD photos & prints.—Odysseus1479 (talk) 22:48, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: per discussion and arguments. --Elly (talk) 07:56, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1952 is too recent to be expired, IA publication date, meta data issue, Would strongly suggest checking volumes/categories for other years, as this may be a systemic issue.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:55, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. Italian publications from 1954 / 1955, so not in the PD yet. --Rosenzweig τ 15:13, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1945 is too recent to be expired. Was there a US registration or renewal?

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:54, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: This is the yearbook of the Museum for Natural History in Genova, Italy, volumes 62 and 63 published in 1945 and 1949. There are multiple contributors, the first one that I saw was en:Oscar de Beaux, who died in 1955. So at least parts of the file are definitely still copyrighted. The source page at [26] also says "Copyright Status: In copyright. Digitized with the permission of the rights holder." So I'll delete it as still in copyright. Anyone wanting to request undeletion at a later point please make a list of all the contributors (at the link already given or at [27]) plus the year they died so the correct year for undeletion can be determined. --Rosenzweig τ 18:19, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

London publication, One of the authors is Francis Wall Oliver (1864–1951) , I've not nominated the images, as they would need to be carefully reviewed on a case by case basis.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:01, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination, because the work of Francis Wall Oliver, who served as one of the translators and also wrote some original text for the second volume, is still protected until the end of 2021 in the UK. The files can be restored in 2022. There's a bunch of (mostly Austrian) illustrators named inside the volumes, but all of them died over 70 years ago as I found. --Rosenzweig τ 18:49, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likewise File:Ancient civilizations of Mexico and Central America (IA civili03spin).pdf.

Not a US government work. Permission from publisher at source is personal/NC/educational only. The 70-year p.m.a. term will not expire until 2038. —Odysseus1479 (talk) 01:03, 13 December 2020 (UTC) P.S. On a second look I see no copyright notice, so they may be PD regardless of the AMNH statement on the IA page.—01:53, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: {{PD-US-no notice}}. --Rosenzweig τ 19:35, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not necessarily expired. 1961 publication, Was there a renewal ? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:19, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: it has a copyright notice but wasn't renewed. --rubin16 (talk) 07:33, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]