User talk:PaleoNeolitic
Allen formation
[edit]Is the elamosaurid you drew Kawanectes lafquenianum?--Bubblesorg (talk) 17:58, 7 October 2019 (UTC) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kawanectes just in case that link does not work--Bubblesorg (talk) 17:58, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
- Just a generic Elasmosaurid, using the Scott's Thalassomedon skeletal. PaleoNeolitic (talk) 23:32, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
I see--Bubblesorg (talk) 19:49, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:51, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
Allen Formation in need of update
[edit]![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/48/Allen_Formation_Fauna.png/220px-Allen_Formation_Fauna.png)
Just here to inform that your Allen Formation diagram is now missing the newly described titanosaur Menucocelsior. Kingmeatballs (talk) 01:22, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Rolando MA, Garcia Marsà JA, Agnolín FL, Motta MJ, Rodazilla S, Novas FE (2021-09-20). "The sauropod record of salitral ojo del agua: A upper cretaceous (Allen formation) fossiliferous locality from northern patagonia, Argentina". Cretaceous Research: 105029. DOI:10.1016/j.cretres.2021.105029. ISSN 0195-6671.
- Appreciated it. Gonna add it later. PaleoNeolitic (talk) 14:17, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
Mahakala
[edit]When you edited Mahakala, you did not include the right leg. I need help please! 2001:4479:A204:4400:ACA5:E812:EBA6:BD0A 00:50, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
- What do you need? PaleoNeolitic (talk) 01:09, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Geode of Pulpí map and crystals.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Belbury (talk) 15:21, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Annals of the South African Museum - Annale van die Suid-Afrikaanse Museum (1953) (18421241885).jpg
- File:Annals of the South African Museum - Annale van die Suid-Afrikaanse Museum (1953) (18233550770).jpg
Yours sincerely, ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:18, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Wulatelong holotype skull.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |