Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2020/01/04

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive January 4th, 2020
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

hubo un errorr Rubenrs251 (talk) 04:19, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request on day of upload. --Achim (talk) 09:16, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poster netflix direitos commons errados Juan542c21 (talk) 06:01, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 09:00, 4 Januar 2020 UTC: Copyright violation: Netflix POSTER --Krdbot 13:54, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Altstadt 2A02:908:2A43:BBC0:BD9C:D8AF:9EAD:5A0 18:03, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Nonsense request. --Achim (talk) 18:55, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:SS#Web_browsers Renamed user uofgjwfojfowubwofemipvwjboiw (talk) 13:40, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 16:44, 4 Januar 2020 UTC: Commons:Screenshot: web site --Krdbot 19:54, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Nathynwithay (talk) 22:33, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request on day of upload. --Achim (talk) 09:50, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Other Dta13666 (talk) 03:56, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Nonsense request, user warned. --Achim (talk) 09:23, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Blurry Dta13666 (talk) 03:58, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Nonsense request, user warned. --Achim (talk) 09:26, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Origianl file was removed by the author (Presidential Office of Taiwan on Flickr), New file is avaliable at File:01.04 總統慰勉空軍第一雷達分隊 - Flickr id 49326960077.jpg. Howard61313 (talk) 12:20, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 15:03, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image created by a banned user, possibly uploaded by a sockpuppet/meatpuppet. Also, educationally worthless, poor quality and redundant. AshFriday (talk) 01:27, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • AshFriday's userpage states "Fighting a never-ending battle against copyright vios and smut." This DR is clearly biased. I doubt he has the ability to distinguish between educational and non-educational illustrations. I don't care whether these images are uploaded by a banned user or not as they look clearly educational to me.  Speedy keep. AshFriday please explain why do you think it's "educationally worthless, poor quality and redundant". Did you even looked where it's being used? Do you have any idea how hard it is to get "free" anime illustrations on Commons? This is NOT porn. STOP trying to censor Commons. Masum Reza📞 04:30, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Converted to mass DR, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Files AshFriday doesn't like. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 15:36, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image created by a banned user, possibly uploaded by a sockpuppet/meatpuppet. Also, educationally worthless, poor quality and redundant. AshFriday (talk) 01:28, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Converted to mass DR, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Files AshFriday doesn't like. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 15:36, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Creepy, creepy, creepy. Nipples are visible and the subtitle includes the word 小学生, meaning "grade schooler" (i.e., implying the subject is well underage). This image is probably illegal in many places. Finally, this image is used mainly in Wikipedia's "Censorship in Japan" article and doesn't actually depict typical Japanese censorship. What use is there for this image? Furrykef (talk) 02:04, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep "Creepy" is not a valid reason for deletion. I have no idea if this is "probably illegal in many places", but I am pretty sure it is not illegal in the U.S. Suspected child pornography should be reported to WMF legal. They have lawyers who can actually understand if something is illegal. Bluepjs23 (talk) 16:45, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • When I say "creepy" I don't mean just that the image itself is creepy. I mean it's creepy that Wikimedia is hosting this image. If we accept this image as being a pornographic image of a minor—and it pretty much says outright that it is—then it would be illegal in at least one U.S. state (Utah); see Wikipedia:Legal status of drawn pornography depicting minors. Finally, you have not answered my question, "What use is there for this image?" Again, it is not representative of censorship in Japan, and there is definitely no need to show a nude child (cartoon or not) in order to illustrate the concept. Can we at least agree that not having any conceivable use is a valid reason to delete? - Furrykef (talk) 23:25, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • The image originally only depicted the "censored" side. What is the educational value of the current version? In the context of the article in which it's used, it is also supposedly illegal. (Not voting because I was brought in by an outside discussion.) --Raijinili (talk) 20:41, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep This file is currently in use on five different wiki projects, making it automatically in scope for Commons. Please consult previous DR for more details. JasonGlennHuntly (talk) 01:52, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • The question isn't whether it's in scope for Commons... the question is whether it belongs on Wikimedia at all. I admit I was not familiar with Commons' policies when I made this request for deletion, but, frankly, I find it bizarre that there is apparently no process for removing images that are potentially illegal other than contacting Wikimedia's lawyers. Shouldn't this sort of thing be common sense? - Furrykef (talk) 13:13, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Used, not a child pornography and some of the content here could result in viewers' protest, that is not the reason for deletion. --rubin16 (talk) 18:08, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image created by a banned user, possibly uploaded by a sockpuppet/meatpuppet. Also, educationally worthless, poor quality and redundant. AshFriday (talk) 01:30, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Converted to mass DR, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Files AshFriday doesn't like. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 15:36, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image created by a banned user, possibly uploaded by a sockpuppet/meatpuppet. Also, educationally worthless, poor quality and redundant. AshFriday (talk) 01:30, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Converted to mass DR, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Files AshFriday doesn't like. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 15:37, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image of questionable educational value. AshFriday (talk) 01:33, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Converted to mass DR, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Files AshFriday doesn't like. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 15:37, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image created by a banned user, possibly uploaded by a sockpuppet/meatpuppet. Also, educationally worthless, poor quality and redundant. AshFriday (talk) 01:36, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Converted to mass DR, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Files AshFriday doesn't like. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 15:37, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image created by a banned user, possibly uploaded by a sockpuppet/meatpuppet. Also, educationally worthless, poor quality and redundant. AshFriday (talk) 01:37, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Converted to mass DR, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Files AshFriday doesn't like. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 15:37, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image created by a banned user, possibly uploaded by a sockpuppet/meatpuppet. Also, educationally worthless, poor quality and redundant. AshFriday (talk) 01:38, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Converted to mass DR, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Files AshFriday doesn't like. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 15:37, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image created by a banned user, possibly uploaded by a sockpuppet/meatpuppet. Also, educationally worthless, poor quality and redundant. AshFriday (talk) 01:39, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Converted to mass DR, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Files AshFriday doesn't like. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 15:37, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image created by a banned user, possibly uploaded by a sockpuppet/meatpuppet. Also, educationally worthless, poor quality and redundant. AshFriday (talk) 01:40, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Converted to mass DR, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Files AshFriday doesn't like. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 15:37, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image created by a banned user, possibly uploaded by a sockpuppet/meatpuppet. Also, educationally worthless, poor quality and redundant. AshFriday (talk) 01:41, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Converted to mass DR, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Files AshFriday doesn't like. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 15:37, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image created by a banned user, possibly uploaded by a sockpuppet/meatpuppet. Commons is not a hosting gallery for amateur cartoonists. Educationally worthless, poor quality and redundant. AshFriday (talk) 01:42, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Converted to mass DR, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Files AshFriday doesn't like. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 15:37, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor qualty gif created by a banned user, possibly uploaded by a sockpuppet/meatpuppet. Also, educationally worthless, poor quality and redundant. AshFriday (talk) 01:43, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello AshFriday,
I understand your reasons to delete this image, but it comes from a Flickr file which is in the public domain. No copyright being infringed, why deleting it? Also, it is the only animated GIF depicting the concept of limited animation in many languages. And the poor quality you refer to is precisely the subject of this type of animation. So, I wouldn't delete it since it breaks no copyright laws and has its purpose.
All the best:Tatvam (talk) 20:57, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Converted to mass DR, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Files AshFriday doesn't like. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 15:37, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image created by a banned user, possibly uploaded by a sockpuppet/meatpuppet. Also, educationally worthless, poor quality and redundant. AshFriday (talk) 01:44, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Converted to mass DR, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Files AshFriday doesn't like. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 15:37, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Indication of miner's genitals and other sensitive body parts. Child Pornography is disallowed. Zeranima da proseticaio (talk) 13:12, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 15:30, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image created by a banned user, possibly uploaded by a sockpuppet/meatpuppet. Also, educationally worthless, poor quality and redundant. AshFriday (talk) 01:45, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Converted to mass DR, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Files AshFriday doesn't like. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 15:37, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image created by a banned user, possibly uploaded by a sockpuppet/meatpuppet. Also, educationally worthless, poor quality, redundant and out of scope. AshFriday (talk) 01:45, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Converted to mass DR, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Files AshFriday doesn't like. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 15:37, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image created by a banned user, possibly uploaded by a sockpuppet/meatpuppet. Also, educationally worthless, poor quality and redundant. AshFriday (talk) 01:46, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Converted to mass DR, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Files AshFriday doesn't like. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 15:37, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

More leftover lolicon spam from Blackshade socks; technically in legitimate use but we do not need this to illustrate something as simple as “manga” or “panchira” Dronebogus (talk) 19:46, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: COM:INUSE. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:31, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image created by a banned user, possibly uploaded by a sockpuppet/meatpuppet. Also, educationally worthless, poor quality and redundant. AshFriday (talk) 01:47, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Converted to mass DR, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Files AshFriday doesn't like. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 15:37, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inappropriate stuff and unclear copyright status of the comic book/piece of paper in question. Paranoia freedom may be a exception, though I don't think it resorts to a illegal content side. Zeranima da proseticaio (talk) 13:30, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 15:31, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image created by a banned user, possibly uploaded by a sockpuppet/meatpuppet. Also, educationally worthless, poor quality and redundant. AshFriday (talk) 01:48, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Converted to mass DR, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Files AshFriday doesn't like. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 15:38, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image created by a banned user, possibly uploaded by a sockpuppet/meatpuppet. Also, educationally worthless, poor quality and redundant. AshFriday (talk) 01:48, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Converted to mass DR, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Files AshFriday doesn't like. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 15:38, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Depiction of a graphic minor child. Illegal. Zeranima da proseticaio (talk) 13:28, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 15:30, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image created by a banned user, possibly uploaded by a sockpuppet/meatpuppet. Also, educationally worthless, poor quality and redundant. AshFriday (talk) 01:49, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Converted to mass DR, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Files AshFriday doesn't like. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 15:38, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image created by a banned user, possibly uploaded by a sockpuppet/meatpuppet. Unused, educationally worthless, poor quality, redundant and therefore out of scope. AshFriday (talk) 01:50, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Converted to mass DR, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Files AshFriday doesn't like. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 15:38, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image created by a banned user, possibly uploaded by a sockpuppet/meatpuppet. Also, educationally worthless, poor quality and redundant. AshFriday (talk) 01:51, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Converted to mass DR, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Files AshFriday doesn't like. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 15:38, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image created by a banned user, possibly uploaded by a sockpuppet/meatpuppet. Also, educationally worthless, poor quality and redundant. AshFriday (talk) 01:51, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Converted to mass DR, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Files AshFriday doesn't like. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 15:38, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inappropriate material consisting of genitals/CP details. Zeranima da proseticaio (talk) 13:15, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 15:30, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image created by a banned user, possibly uploaded by a sockpuppet/meatpuppet. Also, educationally worthless, poor quality and redundant. AshFriday (talk) 01:52, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Converted to mass DR, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Files AshFriday doesn't like. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 15:38, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image created by a banned user, possibly uploaded by a sockpuppet/meatpuppet. Unused, educationally worthless, poor quality, redundant and therefore out of scope. AshFriday (talk) 01:53, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Converted to mass DR, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Files AshFriday doesn't like. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 15:38, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image created by a banned user, possibly uploaded by a sockpuppet/meatpuppet. Also, educationally worthless, poor quality and redundant. AshFriday (talk) 01:54, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Converted to mass DR, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Files AshFriday doesn't like. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 15:38, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image created by a banned user, possibly uploaded by a sockpuppet/meatpuppet. Unused, educationally worthless, poor quality, redundant and therefore out of scope. AshFriday (talk) 01:55, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Converted to mass DR, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Files AshFriday doesn't like. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 15:38, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Illegal depiction of minor child in question, whether artistic impression or graphical, inappropriate to it's core. Zeranima da proseticaio (talk) 13:31, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 15:31, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image created by a banned user, possibly uploaded by a sockpuppet/meatpuppet. Also, educationally worthless, poor quality and redundant. AshFriday (talk) 01:55, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy kept: File is in use, therefore also in scope. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 03:18, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same standing for Keiko005.jpg file, both not allowed here. Low quality image. Zeranima da proseticaio (talk) 13:32, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 15:31, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image created by a banned user, possibly uploaded by a sockpuppet/meatpuppet. Unused, educationally worthless, poor quality, redundant and therefore out of scope. AshFriday (talk) 01:56, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Converted to mass DR, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Files AshFriday doesn't like. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 15:40, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image created by a banned user, possibly uploaded by a sockpuppet/meatpuppet. Also, educationally worthless, poor quality and redundant. AshFriday (talk) 01:57, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Converted to mass DR, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Files AshFriday doesn't like. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 15:41, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image created by a banned user, possibly uploaded by a sockpuppet/meatpuppet. Educationally worthless, poor quality and redundant. AshFriday (talk) 01:57, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Converted to mass DR, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Files AshFriday doesn't like. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 15:41, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Computer based editing. Explicit exposure of genitals whilst covered, COM:CENSORED doesn't apply too. Zeranima da proseticaio (talk) 13:29, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 15:31, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image created by a banned user, possibly uploaded by a sockpuppet/meatpuppet. Also, educationally worthless, poor quality and redundant. AshFriday (talk) 01:58, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Converted to mass DR, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Files AshFriday doesn't like. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 15:41, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Child Pornography is disallowed. COM:CENSORED doesn't apply. Zeranima da proseticaio (talk) 13:25, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 15:30, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image created by a banned user, possibly uploaded by a sockpuppet/meatpuppet. Also, educationally worthless, poor quality and redundant. AshFriday (talk) 01:59, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Automatic keep as in use on 8 projects, as highlighted in the other DR open at the same time as this one. -- (talk) 11:14, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Converted to mass DR, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Files AshFriday doesn't like. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 15:41, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Intricate graphic depiction of a minor, indicating child Pornography. Zeranima da proseticaio (talk) 13:08, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 15:29, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image created by a banned user, possibly uploaded by a sockpuppet/meatpuppet. Also, educationally worthless, poor quality and redundant. AshFriday (talk) 02:00, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Converted to mass DR, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Files AshFriday doesn't like. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 15:42, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image created by a banned user, possibly uploaded by a sockpuppet/meatpuppet. Also, educationally worthless, poor quality and redundant. AshFriday (talk) 02:00, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Converted to mass DR, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Files AshFriday doesn't like. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 15:42, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image created by a banned user, possibly uploaded by a sockpuppet/meatpuppet. Also, educationally worthless, poor quality and redundant. AshFriday (talk) 02:01, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Converted to mass DR, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Files AshFriday doesn't like. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 15:42, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake book cover uploaded by sockpuppet as a gratuitously pedophiliac alternative to actual historical erotic fiction covers, which we have. In use but possibly added by uploader and often blatantly unneeded (i.e. no caption, added to an already cluttered page, unclear illustrative purpose etc.) Dronebogus (talk) 20:29, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:35, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image created by a banned user, possibly uploaded by a sockpuppet/meatpuppet. Also, educationally worthless, poor quality and redundant. AshFriday (talk) 02:02, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Converted to mass DR, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Files AshFriday doesn't like. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 15:42, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image created by a banned user, possibly uploaded by a sockpuppet/meatpuppet. Also, educationally worthless, poor quality and redundant. AshFriday (talk) 02:03, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Converted to mass DR, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Files AshFriday doesn't like. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 15:42, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OOS fake book uploaded by creator sock, modern pedophiliac imagery of no historical value, in use but possibly added by sockpuppet of creator Dronebogus (talk) 20:25, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:55, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image created by a banned user, possibly uploaded by a sockpuppet/meatpuppet. Also, educationally worthless, poor quality and redundant. AshFriday (talk) 02:03, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Converted to mass DR, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Files AshFriday doesn't like. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 15:42, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image created by a banned user, possibly uploaded by a sockpuppet/meatpuppet. Also, educationally worthless, poor quality and redundant. AshFriday (talk) 02:04, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Converted to mass DR, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Files AshFriday doesn't like. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 15:42, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image created by a banned user, possibly uploaded by a sockpuppet/meatpuppet. Also, educationally worthless, poor quality and redundant. AshFriday (talk) 02:05, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Converted to mass DR, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Files AshFriday doesn't like. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 15:42, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image created by a banned user, possibly uploaded by a sockpuppet/meatpuppet. Coomons is not a hosting service for amateur cartoonists. Educationally worthless, poor quality and redundant. AshFriday (talk) 02:06, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Converted to mass DR, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Files AshFriday doesn't like. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 15:42, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image created by a banned user, possibly uploaded by a sockpuppet/meatpuppet. Unused, educationally worthless, poor quality, redundant and therefore out of scope. AshFriday (talk) 02:08, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Converted to mass DR, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Files AshFriday doesn't like. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 15:41, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image created by a banned user, possibly uploaded by a sockpuppet/meatpuppet. Also, educationally worthless, poor quality and redundant. AshFriday (talk) 02:08, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Converted to mass DR, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Files AshFriday doesn't like. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 15:41, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image created by a banned user, possibly uploaded by a sockpuppet/meatpuppet. Also, educationally worthless, poor quality and redundant. AshFriday (talk) 02:09, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Converted to mass DR, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Files AshFriday doesn't like. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 15:41, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image created by a banned user, possibly uploaded by a sockpuppet/meatpuppet. Also, educationally worthless, poor quality and redundant. AshFriday (talk) 02:09, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Converted to mass DR, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Files AshFriday doesn't like. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 15:41, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files created by User:Midnight68

[edit]

Images created by a banned user, possibly uploaded by a sockpuppet/meatpuppet. Also, educationally worthless, poor quality and redundant. AshFriday (talk) 01:27, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Expanded rationale:
All of these images were created by a banned user and likely uploaded by a sockpuppet/meatpuppet. All of them are lacking in educational value, many are redundant (we already have numerous examples of anime/manga style art) and others were previously deleted in a 2010 DR. Commons is not a hosting service for amateur cartoonists; consequently, these badly-drawn, poorly executed "illustrations" (for lack of a better word) have no place on this project. Delete them all without exception. AshFriday (talk) 02:20, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AshFriday (talk) 02:20, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • AshFriday's userpage states "Fighting a never-ending battle against copyright vios and smut." This DR is clearly biased. I doubt he has the ability to distinguish between educational and non-educational illustrations. I don't care whether these images are uploaded by a banned user or not as they look clearly educational to me. Symbol  Speedy keep. AshFriday please explain why do you think it's "educationally worthless, poor quality and redundant". Did you even looked where it's being used? Do you have any idea how hard it is to get "free" anime illustrations on Commons? This is NOT porn. STOP trying to censor Commons. Masum Reza📞 04:30, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
File Usage
File:RenPy001.png 10
File:KodomoCensored.png 5
File:KodomoNiabot.png 1
File:ColoringBook002.png 4
File:CapAward.png 5
File:TimelyShield3.png 5
File:TimelyShield2.png 2
File:GimpScanlation001.png 2
File:YukiClip2A.gif 8
File:Netball001.png 2
File:YuuseiShonenPanel.jpg 4
File:Aki1.png 2
File:KodomoPress004.jpg 2
File:GloryBeaFuntimeComics.png 2
File:WikiReader018.png 4
File:KodomoNoSaori.png 4
File:Akibachan001b.png 3
File:WikiReader015.png 2
File:WikiReaderYuusei.png 2
File:SaoriCover000.png 3
File:Keiko005.jpg 2
File:WikiReader023.png 1
File:HolyMoley001.png 1
File:GimpScreenshotBeforeAfter.png 3
File:Kogalcensored.png 8
File:BitterSweet005.png 1
File:Kogal005.png 6
File:NeicesKnickers.png 4
File:Freshly.png 2
File:KnickerFlasher000.png 2
File:WikiReader024.png 4
File:KodomoBitterSweet.png 4
File:JeanBackstage002.png 7
File:NightRemember.png 6
File:Backstage.png 4
-- (talk) 13:06, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Procedural close, badly created DR. Files weren't tagged, it's all a mess. See Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Files AshFriday doesn't like for a properly created DR. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 16:00, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by La memoria del mundo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photos of non-contributors. Only global edits are uploading these files and using them on es.wiki

Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 05:40, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 05:53, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by La memoria del mundo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:11, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:43, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 00:32, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 09:04, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

“FBMD” in metadata indicates this is a Facebook download Ytoyoda (talk) 00:52, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 09:05, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 08:39, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 09:09, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 08:39, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 09:12, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 08:39, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 09:12, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 08:48, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 09:11, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 08:48, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 09:12, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook image per Metadata, permission is required A1Cafel (talk) 08:49, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 09:11, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook/Instagram image per Metadata, permission is required A1Cafel (talk) 16:45, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 08:55, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook/Instagram image per Metadata, permission is required A1Cafel (talk) 16:46, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 08:55, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook/Instagram image per Metadata, permission is required A1Cafel (talk) 16:46, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 08:55, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook image per Metadata, permission is required A1Cafel (talk) 16:46, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 08:56, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 16:47, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 08:56, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook/Instagram image per Metadata, permission is required A1Cafel (talk) 16:48, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 08:57, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook/Instagram image per Metadata, permission is required A1Cafel (talk) 16:48, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 08:57, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook/Instagram image per Metadata, permission is required A1Cafel (talk) 16:48, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 08:57, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook/Instagram image per Metadata, permission is required A1Cafel (talk) 16:48, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 08:58, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook/Instagram image per Metadata, permission is required A1Cafel (talk) 16:48, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 08:58, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook/Instagram image per Metadata, permission is required A1Cafel (talk) 16:49, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 08:59, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook/Instagram image per Metadata, permission is required A1Cafel (talk) 16:50, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 08:59, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook/Instagram image per Metadata, permission is required A1Cafel (talk) 16:50, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 08:59, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook/Instagram image per Metadata, permission is required A1Cafel (talk) 16:50, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 08:59, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook/Instagram image per Metadata, permission is required A1Cafel (talk) 16:50, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 09:00, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook/Instagram image per Metadata, permission is required A1Cafel (talk) 16:50, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 09:00, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution (the other uploads were deleted as copyright violations). I suspect again copyvio. Taivo (talk) 17:22, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 09:01, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor-quality & unused chemical structural formula; opaque (white) background & strange colouring of atom labels. Have File:Structural formula of 4-pentyn-1-ol.svg as high-quality transparent vector replacement. Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 18:45, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete proposed replacement is a definite improvement. Would be even better if the CH were co-linear with the triple-bond (might take some re-orienting of the whole image). DMacks (talk) 03:56, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:04, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Irrelevant and unused Tgbkinger (talk) 01:24, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --MB-one (talk) 11:59, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

screenshot from facebook. Roy17 (talk) 19:30, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 09:02, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no indication of early enough publication (pre-1946) to be PD in US+Russia PlanespotterA320 (talk) 00:06, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Died in 1944, likely to have participate in Great Patriotic War. PD-Russia-2008 doesn't apply. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 12:58, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mileo92 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low-re images, unlikely to be own work.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 00:21, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 12:58, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate image SecretName101 (talk) 00:59, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: ✓ Done. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 12:59, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused file. Image was being used to play a fantasy reality game show or just a hoax on English Wikipedia. No foreseeable use. Whpq (talk) 01:03, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; not used. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 13:00, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image. Out of scope for hosting on Commons Whpq (talk) 01:04, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; not used; COM:SELFIE. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 13:00, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 03:00, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Uploaded by User:OneBerlin, likely to be the organizer of the event. Image not found elsewhere on the internet. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 13:02, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright watermark implies it is not free for use. Would we not need verified OTRS permission from the design firm? Walter Görlitz (talk) 03:17, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; watermarked file. Please send a permission statement to OTRS. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 13:02, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation: (1) The source is almost certainly false; I uploaded a version of this logo on English Wikipedia a year before this file's uploader had a Wikipedia account. (2) This is a Canadian work; the threshold of originality in Canada is stricter than for the United States, though not as strict as the UK. Closeapple (talk) 04:42, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like O.K. This image consists only of simple geometric shapes or text. It does not meet the threshold of originality, but Im not sure threshold of originality in Canada. This File:Canadian Commercial Corporation logo.svg is not so simple. The source was web site but is closed.--EEIM (talk) 05:38, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion; under COM:TOO; simple shapes. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 13:03, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by RehanBiju (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons is not your personal free web host.

Achim (talk) 09:12, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, personal photos out of COM:SCOPE. - FitIndia Talk Mail 13:42, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Imrkprajapati (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:08, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, Out of COM:SCOPE. - FitIndia Talk Mail 13:37, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope as logo of non-notable company. Taivo (talk) 14:59, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:55, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by DILESHUIKEY (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:02, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, Out of COM:SCOPE. - FitIndia Talk Mail 16:10, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lilbig27 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:06, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, Out of COM:SCOPE. - FitIndia Talk Mail 16:10, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Generally low graphical quality (and missing stereochemistry). But also, unlikely that this form exists at any pH. The guanidine group is more basic than the amine, so that would be protonated first. DMacks (talk) 21:19, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per discussion. --Leyo 22:51, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaceable by File:Guanidinopropionic acid.png as higher quality. DMacks (talk) 21:21, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per discussion. --Leyo 22:53, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Lil2002 (talk) 13:54, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: There seems to be nothing wrong with this image, but COM:CSD#G7 would have been applicable at the time of nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 00:03, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Sonusingh13 (talk) 16:31, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:CSD#G7 would have been applicable at the time of nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 00:29, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is this really the work of the uploader? It appears to be satellite imagery. Please provide the correct source, author, and license status. Green Giant (talk) 16:42, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 00:05, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Transmission code appears to be a Facebook image, permission is required A1Cafel (talk) 16:42, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

- I am the photographer of the image, the image was grabbed off of my own Facebook page for ease of upload. I can re upload the raw images if that is more appropriate. Helitak430 (talk) 03:21, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Helitak430: You are feel free to do so. --A1Cafel (talk) 02:34, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. Uploader's explanation is plausible enough. @Helitak430: Uploading the raw / full resolution images still would be appreciated. --Gestumblindi (talk) 00:07, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook image per Metadata, permission is required A1Cafel (talk) 16:44, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

- I am the photographer of the image, the image was grabbed off of my own Facebook page for ease of upload. I can re upload the raw images if that is more appropriate. Helitak430 (talk) 03:22, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Helitak430: You are feel free to do so. --A1Cafel (talk) 02:34, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. Uploader's explanation is plausible enough. @Helitak430: Uploading the raw / full resolution images still would be appreciated. --Gestumblindi (talk) 00:10, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook image per Metadata, permission is required A1Cafel (talk) 16:44, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

- I am the photographer of the image, the image was grabbed off of my own Facebook page for ease of upload. I can re upload the raw images if that is more appropriate. Helitak430 (talk) 03:22, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Helitak430: You are feel free to do so. --A1Cafel (talk) 02:34, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. Uploader's explanation is plausible enough. @Helitak430: Uploading the raw / full resolution images still would be appreciated. --Gestumblindi (talk) 00:10, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:02, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 00:11, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Asking for a Courtesy Deletion. Alexandra Maringer asked me, if it is possible to delete the picture. It is used nowhere on any Wikimedia project an I could not find any third-party use of it on other websites. I support her request, first out of respect for the people I take pictures of for Wikipedia, second because I have a reputation and the trust of the organizers of the Austrian Film Awards, where I took the picture, which I do not want to risk with photographs the people depicted disapprove of. Tsui (talk) 22:50, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Borderline case but  Delete per above. --Achim (talk) 09:45, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for deleting it, Alexandra Maringer — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2A01:CB0C:83FE:7100:7133:B6ED:BD32:1D16 (talk) 01:34, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: As Achim says, it's a borderline case. Good quality image, but unused and the person doesn't seem to be a particularly well known public figure, so courtesy deleted. --Gestumblindi (talk) 00:25, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

very bad quality, low resolution > 2 better files File:Jacopo de Barbari (toegeschreven) - Portret van Hendrik, graaf van Mecklenburg (1479-1552).jpg, File:Jacopo de' Barbari (attrib.) - Ritratto di Heinrich, duca di Mecklenburg.jpg Oursana (talk) 23:16, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: very bad copy of a painting we have much better copies of. --Gestumblindi (talk) 00:27, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

notability. and is a tv screenshot permitted? Quakewoody (talk) 23:41, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: television screenshot, no permission. --Gestumblindi (talk) 00:28, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:20, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:03, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, Out of COM:SCOPE. - FitIndia Talk Mail 16:57, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of the project scope. Promotional. Edslov (talk) 16:06, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, Out of COM:SCOPE. - FitIndia Talk Mail 16:58, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Indonesia A1Cafel (talk) 08:51, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:27, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:58, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 23:13, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Marco Mondi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyrighted work by Gino Gregori (d. 1973), permission of his heirs needed via COM:OTRS.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:59, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:36, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ángel 22905 Olivares (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:38, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:39, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Gallery of Not Own Work, as shown by drawing, photos of self - not selfies, sizes & transmission data on other photos.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:47, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I blocked the uploader indefinitely as sockpuppet and copyvio-only user. Taivo (talk) 21:43, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Black Bone 666 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work, two copyvios already deleted.

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 09:39, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:46, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Black Bone 666 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low-re images, unlikely to be own works. Everything by user is copyvio.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 18:07, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Angel Lelikakis - Suicidal Angels.jpg is the same photo as File:Angel Lelikakis-Suicidal.jpg, deleted after the request above.
File:Gus Drax - Suicidal Angels.jpg is the same photo as File:Gus Drax.jpg, deleted also after request above.
Thuresson (talk) 01:56, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Per nomination. Claims of "own work" from this contributor are not credible, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Orfeas Tzortzopoulos - Suicidal Angels.jpg. Thuresson (talk) 18:17, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{db-g7}} Dorian Denouement (talk) 23:09, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

G7: author request Dorian Denouement (talk) 18:21, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:08, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aghya Goel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE and copyvios.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:50, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 13:14, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aghya Goel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:36, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 13:14, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 05:05, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:57, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Lil2002 (talk) 06:10, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: ok. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:59, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine. Derivatives of works with unclear copyright status. Uploader did not create a mosaic.

And also File:Бучацька ЗОШ 2, 2019 9.jpg

Микола Василечко (talk) 08:23, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:01, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Indonesia, needs permission from the copyright holder A1Cafel (talk) 08:32, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:02, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS. COM:DW of copyrighted works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 08:54, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Per COM:TOYS DiegoAma (talk) 03:16, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:03, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS. COM:DW of copyrighted works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 08:58, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:03, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted characters.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 09:06, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:03, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These images could be derivative works: they are not only costumes to evoke Mario, but direct elements, with copyright to Nintendo or to the cosplayers themselves (the balloon for example).

Dereckson (talk) 19:11, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • I say  Keep but some of the support for that is a little vague in places. The two Ssb cosplay files seem to be covered by COM:COSTUME in that costumes are not copyrightable. The issue in the Montreal Comiccon 2015 image appears to be the mask. Per the costume guidelines, that would only by copyrightable if a case where "[t]he photo would have to be primarily of the mask or other separable element of the costume", which is not the case here, so that should be fine. Less straightforward are the other files. The guidelines don't mention mascot costumes one way or the other, so Fête des mascottes Granby depends on whether the head piece counts as a mask or similar element, as in the previous case (note that this precedent would affect every file in Category:Mascot costumes and Category:Sports mascots). I don't think the material of a costume affects the copyright, so I think the two MCCC 15 - Balloon Mario files can be kept as with any other costume, but I cannot find any confirmation of that (and, again, this could affect all of Category:Balloon costumes). - AdamBMorgan (talk) 13:46, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • I think we shoud deletion Ballons files, I don't know for the fourth file, but  Keep the others CreativeC38 (talk) 08:59, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • I can't see the difference to other cosplay picture, of which we have tons. Don-kun (talk) 19:14, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - they're out of scope, and only the first and the last are even in use. The first should be deleted because it's still out of scope and illustrates nothing. The last should be deleted because it's used on the Samus article; the other three characters aren't relevant to that, and it's therefore out of scope for usage. MSJapan (talk) 05:59, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    • I don't agree that they are out of scope. They could be used at a future date to illustrate, for example, the range of different and unusal forms of cosplay (in, say, Wikipedia or Wikibooks). The fact that they are not currently in use does not mean they will never have an educational use. - AdamBMorgan (talk) 16:35, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted

Kept

  • File:Montreal Comiccon 2015 - SNES Mario (19453660485).jpg - There is a lack of consensus, and no 'clear' rationale, to require deleting this one, though it's still arguable that it's a DW of the Nintendo character. The clothing is not a 'protectable' part of the costume, as it is utilitarian, and the mask shows no copyrightable originality beyond that embodied in the video game character. I think this is 'okay' simply because it seems unlikely that Nintendo themselves would consider it problematic... it's actually arguable that it's de minimis.

Reventtalk 08:20, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted characters.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 09:11, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Per COM:COSTUME and Mike Godwin DiegoAma (talk) 00:52, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:10, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This doesn't seem to be permanently displayed, i.e. Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Belgium#Freedom of panorama.

Yann (talk) 18:01, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. plicit 00:25, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works. COM:TOYS.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 09:29, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:12, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 01:43, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 14:13, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unfortunatelly I have uploaded cropped image and my intention is to upload a original image Tomáš Bartovič (talk) 09:31, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: quite old and used. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:13, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of a copyrighted character. Yuraily Lic (talk) 09:38, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:13, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted characters.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 09:50, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Have you read Commons:Derivative_works#If_I_take_a_photograph_of_a_kid_who_is_holding_a_stuffed_Winnie_the_Pooh_toy,_does_Disney_own_the_copyright_in_the_photo_since_they_own_the_Pooh_design? "Fan images" appear in several SW articles, including w:Captain Phasma and w:Kylo Ren, and there are many images of cosplayers in use elsewhere.TAnthony (talk) 17:12, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Assuming the en:R2D2 character and its likeness have their own copyright, Delete all except File:Maker Faire, Berlin (BL7C0149).jpg as the prominent aspect of these photos are the R2-D2 droids. Absent a legal opinion that File:Maker Faire, Berlin (BL7C0149).jpg infringes, I would say "keep". For all deletions, transwiki to projects that currently use it under the local fair-use policy. Davidwr (talk) 20:17, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:16, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 11:49, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Addition,

(Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Gen Con Indy 2008) --Yuraily Lic (talk) 23:18, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:25, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 11:52, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:24, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 11:57, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Yuraily Lic: I would intend to nominate all the rest files of this category plus its 3 subcategories. Do you oppose me? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 22:40, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:24, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 10:22, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:17, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

promotional image, previously published on webpage marked as copyright: https://www.haydenmedical.com/product-category/surgical-instruments/needle-holders-surgical-instruments/page/2/ Drchriswilliams (talk) 10:45, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yah the unusual watermark makes it not useful and of questionable license. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 08:36, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:18, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image previously published on a webpage that is marked as copyright: https://www.haydenmedical.com/product-category/bilumix/ Drchriswilliams (talk) 10:52, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:18, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 10:57, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:22, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 11:00, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:22, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 11:01, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:22, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:Derivative works?

Attribution for deletion templates. Name of the Works: Template:Delete, Template:Idw. Licensing: CC BY-SA 3.0, source: Wikimedia Commons, authors - Special:History/Tempate:Delete, Special:History/Tempate:Afd. Note: there are translated versions. To see the page of a translated version, go to Template:Delete/xx, Template:Idw/xx and change the XX in the URL bar to the language code. To see the authors of translations, go to Special:History/Tempate:Delete/xx, Special:History/Tempate:Afd/xx and use the URL bar to change the XX to language code. Examples: Template:Delete/ru, Template:Idw/ru, Special:History/Tempate:Afd/ru,Special:History/Tempate:Delete/ru for RU language code. ParticipantOfTheEncyclopedia (talk) 11:02, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:35, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 11:03, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:35, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 11:06, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:34, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 11:10, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:33, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of a copyrighted character. [1]

Yuraily Lic (talk) 10:47, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:33, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of a copyrighted character.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 11:14, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:33, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 11:20, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:33, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 02:37, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:00, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COPY RIGHT CONTENT Baddu676 (talk) 11:21, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:32, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of a copyrighted character. Yuraily Lic (talk) 11:22, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:32, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 11:27, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:32, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative Work: Display background, picture without permission, unknown source, no de minimis. Wdwd (talk) 12:36, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:31, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An unused and uncategorised file. Out of the project scope? The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 12:48, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:31, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OTRS-permission from Christa Power (see file history) is needed. Taivo (talk) 13:50, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:31, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo and the uploader's last remaining contribution, out of project scope. The file is called a selfie – I doubt, maybe copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 14:01, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:30, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:30, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploads by User:くろまめたろう

[edit]

Derivative works. Designs are well above TOO. Yasu (talk) 15:14, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. File:京都銀行.jpg is also a COM:DW.--Mzaki (talk) 18:34, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:29, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non Free Image Stalinsunnykvj (talk) 15:45, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:36, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clearly cropped from an episode of a game show and therefore not a free image. Straight up copyright violation TenPoundHammer (talk) 20:34, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It would appear this way, but this screenshot is from a clip that was uploaded onto the Game Show Network's (the copyright holders) official Vimeo channel under a free Creative Commons license.
- Stinkyjaden (talk) 01:40, 5 January 2020 (UTC)Stinkyjaden[reply]

On a surface level, it would appear this way, but if you dig deep into it, you'll see that the clip the screenshot in question was from is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported. Also, the channel that uploaded this clip is the official Vimeo channel of the publicity department of Game Show Network (the copyright holders). So they chose to license this clip under that license. Because of this, the copyright violation nomination should be lifted.
- Stinkyjaden (talk) 03:28, 8 January 2020 (UTC)Stinkyjaden[reply]

  • @Stinkyjaden: I don't see indication of that license at the linked Vimeo source: where is it indicated? - Jmabel ! talk 06:31, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • @Jmabel: Under the title and to the right of the upload date, press "more" to pull up the "About" tab. Go to the fourth row where it says "License," and to the right of that should be the man in the circle indicating the specific CC license. Press that icon, and it will direct you to the stated license on the Creative Commons website.
      - Stinkyjaden (talk) 13:03, 8 January 2020 (UTC)Stinkyjaden[reply]

 Keep We can keep this -- as Stinkyjaden says, the Vimeo image has a CC-BY license. I have added the {{Licensereview}} template..     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:31, 8 January 2020 (UTC)  Keep Thanks, the above clarifies it. For what it's worth, when I upload something where the permission trail is subtle like this, I usually use the "permissions" property of {{Information}} to explain the situation, a practice I strongly recommend. - Jmabel ! talk 16:45, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: A Creative Commons 3.0 licence could be verified. --De728631 (talk) 16:00, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted characters. Yuraily Lic (talk) 18:52, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 13:10, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 18:53, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 13:10, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Leblanclh3 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Official documents. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:54, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, work of Iraq government is not in public domain. Taivo (talk) 20:27, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted work by Gino Gregori (d. 1973), permission of his heirs needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:57, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 22:10, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Who is the painter? Permission? Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:31, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It was released by Ministry of External Affairs of India in public domain. Please keep the image as I think it will not harm any copyrights. Mahusha (Talk) 16:19, 4 January 2020(UTC)
@Mahusha: Hi. The fact that they release this painting on their website doesn't mean they own the copyright on it. The copyright is with the artist and copyright lasts 60 years after his death (unless if he died before 1941 and the copyright lasts only 50 years) so you have to find out his name and have his heirs sending a permission via COM:OTRS. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:21, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:03, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Нет разрешение на свободные лицензии от правообладателя или автора на медаль Союза художников России Dogad75 (talk) 10:57, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; no OTRS for over 30 days. --Gbawden (talk) 09:03, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of photo, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:43, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It is a photo from a book but taken from a source belonging to my uncle, if want i can take a picture(myself) claiming it, and then posting that one.
@Ashtar jafari: Photographer must send a permission via COM:OTRS. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:06, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

shall i just take the pic myself, does it really matter xd, i have consent from the man- idk how to contact you with him lol maybe mobile but hes a old guy im just doing this to make a nice wiki on him for the work he has done


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:04, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AnirakJ (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Permission from Peter H. Feist needed via COM:OTRS.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:21, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Per wikimandia. --Gbawden (talk) 09:08, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Previously published at https://www.rgbasketball.com/the-staff, requires OTRS ticket Ytoyoda (talk) 23:35, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:04, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

artwork, non an "own" and free-licence work - cover of Baglioni's last album. — danyele 18:17, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:36, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo quality quite low, we can't properly see most of the subjects. Picture not exploitable. Myloufa (talk) 14:29, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: This is the only picture we have of Cécile Wajsbrot and Pascale Petit, both of whom apparently merit Wikipedia articles. It's not a technically good picture, but both of them are recognisable in it, so it's potentially useful. --bjh21 (talk) 12:13, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per bjh21 above. As long as we don't have better images, then a technically bad image has to suffice. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 21:16, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{db-g7}} Dorian Denouement (talk) 23:12, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused personal photo. --P 1 9 9   15:40, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

G7: author request Dorian Denouement (talk) 18:19, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Already deleted. --Green Giant (talk) 23:20, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No link to connect Gunofficial1998 (talk) 22:52, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ezarateesteban 18:48, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Twitter bird is copyrighted. We have file:Logo France Insoumise.svg. Taivo (talk) 11:03, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:52, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems like advertizing of non-notable writer and non-notable book. Taivo (talk) 16:11, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:51, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 16:41, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know where this photograph comes from and who is the owner, but you can find it here. Maybe the same author. No evidence that it is not "own work".--ProfessorX (talk) 19:41, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:36, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook/Instagram image per Metadata, permission is required A1Cafel (talk) 16:44, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:35, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:48, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:35, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Grigoras Victorita (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:49, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:34, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pseppelfricke (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photo, documents, drawing. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:55, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:33, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pseppelfricke (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams. Duplicates. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:04, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:20, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded as own work on January 3, 2020. Previously deleted on December 17, 2019 (File:Orfeas Tzortzopoulos - suicidal angels.jpg). EXIF-data say this is from Facebook. Visible credit in the photo to "Gorka Photography". Published December 16, 2018 at Gorka Photography's Instagram page here (Instagram owned by Facebook). If this photo is deleted, uploader should receive a final warning not to upload photos in breach of copyright law. Thuresson (talk) 17:45, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:33, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by YandielUzuriad (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:16, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:31, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake license, logo actually a bid logo made by PSSI as seen here. Flix11 (talk) 22:23, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by EugeneZelenko. --Didym (talk) 14:09, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free logo. Raymie (talk) 23:18, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 02:13, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

inferior duplicate of book cover art requested by same user Tibet Nation (talk) 05:48, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: author request. --ƏXPLICIT 01:11, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused screenshot of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:27, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:15, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File was removed from Flickr, unknown copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 17:09, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:16, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File was removed from Flickr, unknown copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 17:09, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:16, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 18:01, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:18, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of a copyrighted character. Yuraily Lic (talk) 18:29, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

For Discussion or information about this: The Statue of Liberty Replica and Gundam Statue are the most photographed places in Odaiba. They are in public places and there are no signs that "No photos are allowed" placed around them. Dandy1022 (talk) 03:58, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:20, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

NE individual /out of scope Tekstman (talk) 14:07, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete not in commons scope, identifiable person not in public place -- smial (talk) 00:49, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Polarlys (talk) 14:09, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
File:Howard.jpg

Image scanned from a book (Coal Age Galapagos, Calder, 2012) and not uploaded by the original author. Michael C. Rygel 14:39, 26 November 2012 (UTC)


Deleted: INeverCry 02:20, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A miniature of very low quality, improbable to be own work of the uploader as stated. ŠJů (talk) 20:39, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:21, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images are not blacked out like on File:4chan.png, see COM:NETCOPYRIGHT. Thibaut (talk) 20:55, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:22, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work, scan of old photo ShinePhantom (talk) 19:17, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:31, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work, scan of old photo Dogad75 (talk) 20:59, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Arthur Crbz. --ƏXPLICIT 01:23, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Description: "Rise up, Turkish son!", Azerbaijan, early 1990s (Nagorno-Karabakh War)
So why is this CC-0? I would say it's a copyvio, but want to give the uploader an oportunity to say something D-Kuru (talk) 21:04, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

D-Kuru, this poster is published on various sites and is freely available, no one claimed copyright. Ulvimamedov57 21:15, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Ulvimamedov57: Just because there is no copyright information displayed somewhere does not mean the image is really free to use or even licenced under a free licence). You downloading the image does not make you a copyrightholder in any shape or form and allows you to relicence the image in any form.
Your logic: This car isn't locked. There is no note in the car to who it belongs. So it is perfectly fine that I take the car and drive around with it as much as I like. Sorry, but this doesn't work that way.
--D-Kuru (talk) 22:52, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:24, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is is quite unclear that the Flickr account can freely license an image owned by "LAT Photography", as per the file description. See also https://www.latimages.com/ Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:15, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:24, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to the court decision 北京北大方正电子有限公司与上海跃兴旺贸易有限公司等著作权权属、侵权纠纷一审民事判决书, the separate characters in Pingheti font (方正平和体) may have the copyright, unless they are too simple. In this image, "平". "和", and "体" are not simple. Njzjz (talk) 21:19, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:26, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bogus claim of "own work"; please see also Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_Gunkot K.e.coffman (talk) 21:32, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:27, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Italy. Tomer T (talk) 22:26, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:32, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Italy. Tomer T (talk) 22:26, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:32, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Italy. Tomer T (talk) 22:27, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:31, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong license + copyright 1974 Gunofficial1998 (talk) 22:29, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:32, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Life magazine photos. Likely still copyrighted in the US, where they were probably first published. Gunofficial1998 (talk) 22:38, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:33, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Life magazine photos. Likely still copyrighted in the US, where they were probably first published. Gunofficial1998 (talk) 22:38, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:34, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not found at URL. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:08, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:35, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is not the correct file format and it has a different font. Sven792 (talk) 14:32, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: author request. --ƏXPLICIT 09:41, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{db-g7}} Dorian Denouement (talk) 23:09, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

G7: author request Dorian Denouement (talk) 18:20, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. ƏXPLICIT 09:38, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There were a number of photographs that were uploaded via this account without my permission. I would like to request their deletion. Many thanks. Dorian Denouement (talk) 13:41, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination credible assertion of authorship issues and not in use. --Geni (talk) 04:57, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Yulia Dmitryevna 19:01, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Yulia Dmitryevna: Dear Yulia, as this picture depicts the famous Dutch historian Maarten van Rossem, we thought it would be a valuable contribution to Wikimedia Commons. --The Sewell-Hohler Syndicate (talk) 22:12, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: known figure, within scope. --Ciell (talk) 15:24, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{db-g7}} Dorian Denouement (talk) 23:10, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

G7: author request Dorian Denouement (talk) 18:21, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. ƏXPLICIT 09:35, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There were a number of photographs that were uploaded via this account without my permission. I would like to request their deletion. Many thanks. Dorian Denouement (talk) 13:43, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination credible assertion of authorship issues and not in use. --Geni (talk) 04:55, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{FoP-India}} does not cover 2D art, and the art seen in these photographs of an art gallery is not de minimis.

DMacks (talk) 15:50, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:19, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:29, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@HominiLupus: Hi. Well I've read that but person doesn't appears me to be very notable inside Russia as outside, at least at first sight... --Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:23, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Patrick Rogel: Hi. In russian culture, there are many people who are not "very notable", but are important for natural processes. In the text, which will be published in the coming days, we will describe what Alexander Kutinov did, give links and consider illustrations - including his work outside of Russia. The goal in the future is to publish an article in the Russian Wikipedia, so it is important to start this work in Wikimedia. We suggest not to delete the archive of photos. We plan to develop and use it. --HominiLupus (talk)
@HominiLupus: an Administrator will close this request, not me. Let's wait for their decision. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:11, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Patrick Rogel: Yes, of course. This is understandable. But it is important for me to reach an understanding with you. Thanks.HominiLupus (talk)
"Notable person" is not a Commons criteria. --ssr (talk) 12:52, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Most of the files are in use by n:ru:Планируются концерты памяти Александра Кутинова, are not of any violation and thus should be kept. --ssr (talk) 23:53, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: in use. --Krd 13:21, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

gezeigtes Werk Ralf Roletschek 21:30, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:21, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

gezeigtes Werk: kein Bild der US-amerikanischen Bundesregierung oder einem ihrer Organe Ralf Roletschek 21:34, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:22, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

gezeigtes Werk Ralf Roletschek 21:29, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, per {{FoP-China}}, freedom of panorama in China applies only if author is mentioned. Taivo (talk) 08:37, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook/Instagram image per Metadata, permission is required A1Cafel (talk) 16:42, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Question Where has User:Joditran confirmed this? Gestumblindi (talk) 00:08, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment It's in the summary template. Bookscale (talk) 08:02, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I was thinking of an additional confirmation besides the "author" field in the summary template, which is often not correctly filled. For example, in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Werombi Bushfire.jpg the uploader Helitak430 has expressly confirmed that they took the image themselves and given a plausible explanation for the Facebook metadata, so I decided to keep that one. But I have not seen a comment by Joditran yet. Gestumblindi (talk) 11:42, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Except there's no explicit requirement in Commons that anyone do anything more than insert "own work" into the template. Why aren't we siding in good faith with the uploader in the absence of anything suggesting it is a copyrighted image? If it was appearing on reverse images searches or something, I wouldn't be having this debate, but this entire nomination is really just pure speculation. Bookscale (talk) 11:34, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Facebook/instagram metadata (the "FBMD"..." stuff) is often an indication that an image was taken from someone else's Facebook page, so getting additional confirmation would be reassuring. I understand the nomination, but that being said, the metadata is of course neither evidence that it it's not the uploader's own work. As in the case of Helitak430, something like "grabbed off of my own Facebook page for ease of upload" is of course possible. Therefore, Im going to add a  Weak keep vote in the absence of additional indication of this being someone else's work. Gestumblindi (talk) 12:21, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment: Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2016/04#Facebook images (exif/metadata) shows that COM:AGF is suppressed by COM:PRP. There are so many ways that this image may not be his own work. IMO there is significant doubt of the ownership of this image. You cannot prove this is his own work as well. --A1Cafel (talk) 14:10, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • I've already showed you several reasons why it is likely to be his own work - he has written it in text under the picture, the picture doesn't appear on a reverse image search which would likely show up a copyright violation, and there's no Wikimedia policy that images from Facebook are automatically deemed to be copyvios. You are simply clutching at straws to justify deleting a picture that shouldn't. I don't understand how making arguments like this is a constructive contribution to Wikimedia. There is not "significant doubt" about the origin of the picture. Bookscale (talk) 09:16, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 09:45, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unknown author, see description of the file. Harold (talk) 19:44, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per discussion. --Sealle (talk) 09:46, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake logos of cancelled Apollo missions by unknown author(s), see also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Apollo 20-insignia.png. Harold (talk) 19:46, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also:

--Harold (talk) 19:51, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 09:48, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unknown publication date, author or place (no details in the source either). The photograph needs to have been published "in Pakistan before 1970" to make it eligible for {{PD-Pakistan}} but we don't have any of the details.

PS: Publication in the 1960's or even 1970 seems unlikely considering the subject looked like this in 1961 and this in 1971. Gotitbro (talk) 20:29, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, PCP. --Sealle (talk) 09:50, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

gezeigtes Werk Ralf Roletschek 21:30, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The posters in this museum are indeed visible on this image, but in my opinion this is an instance of De minimis, the file is in use to illustrate the progaganda Poster Art Center and not the posters shown. Propaganda Poster Art Centre is in the name of the file and in the description, if the posters would be removed the image would become useless. The Poster Art Centre is the reason for the creation of the file. See https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:De_minimis#Guidelines. Elly (talk) 22:46, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Pashley (talk) 23:27, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Without the (supposedly copyrighted) posters, the image would be meaningless. I think that's the litmus test for COM:DM: Something is only de minimis if it's not (part of) the image's main subject. If you edit out the posters from this image, you don't see the "Poster Art Center" but a nondescript room. Unlike the example File:Virgin America airplane interior.jpg at COM:DM, where the view of an airplane interior is not in any way dependent upon what is appearing on the screens. Gestumblindi (talk) 00:16, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
FoP-China refers to "reproduction of works in outdoor public place"; this is an indoor place. So it's not applicable. Gestumblindi (talk) 22:09, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per Gestumblindi. --Sealle (talk) 09:51, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

gezeigtes Werk Ralf Roletschek 21:31, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The posters in this museum are indeed visible on this image, but in my opinion this is an instance of De minimis, the file is in use to illustrate the progaganda Poster Art Center and not the posters shown. Propaganda Poster Art Centre is in the name of the file and in the description, if the posters would be removed the image would become useless. The Poster Art Centre is the reason for the creation of the file. See https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:De_minimis#Guidelines. Elly (talk) 22:47, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, DM isn't applicable. --Sealle (talk) 09:52, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

gezeigtes Werk Ralf Roletschek 21:32, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you want to delete? This relates to the theme of the Chelyabinsk meteorite. (If that I am the author of the work.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danyclockworker (talk • contribs) 21:56, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Its your own work? Then sorry. --Ralf Roletschek 22:12, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sealle (talk) 09:52, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is A selfie Dta13666 (talk) 03:57, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rationale is patent nonsense, but empty scan page. --Achim (talk) 09:28, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per Achim, out of scope. --Sealle (talk) 09:54, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The Austrian Federal Chamber of Labour sent us a request to delete these two files because Lukas Baumühlner (one of the subjects of the files) “has never agreed to the photographer to publish these two pictures on your website”. The WMF Legal Team asked me to create this DR to know the community's opinion. Please express your opinion.

Bencemac (talk) 08:51, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

General Note: Steindy, the original author of this image, is blocked until 2020-01-24. If the author should have an option to post his oppinion, the deletion request should be held open until this point --D-Kuru (talk) 19:01, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Sports people, and I include referees, get their photographs taken at events all the time. If they don't want those photographs to be made public, they have every opportunity to ask the photographer not to include them, or to step away from the scene. The photos could benefit from {{Personality rights}} notices but otherwise should be beyond complaint. Rodhullandemu (talk) 09:32, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nein, die Rechtslage ist da in Österreich ein wenig anders. --Ralf Roletschek 12:38, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep gem. EuGH 7. Februar 2012, Az. 40660/08 und 60641/08 ("...öffentliches Informationsinteresse nach den Umständen des Einzelfalles auch an Sportthemen...") kollidiert mit § 78 (ö.)UrHG (Bildnisschutz). Dem Caroline-Urteil II ist dabei mehr Relevanz zuzumessen. Achtung, in Österreich existiert kein Gesetz ähnlich dem deutschen § 23 (d)KUG! Schon das Anfertigen, nicht nur die Verbreitung unzulässiger Fotos ist unter Strafe gestellt. Allerdings ist eine Verfolgung durch § 82 (ö)UrhG recht stark behindert. --Ralf Roletschek 12:35, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete I think, we should give the guy the courtesy, if he doesn't wish the picture to be published. He is clearly not a public person, and I even doubt he is by any means notable, be it for Wikipedia or for any other related project. --A.Savin 01:07, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Wenn ein Schiedsrichter nicht eine Persönlichkeit der Öffentlichkeit sein will, dann darf er nicht aufs Spielfeld gehen. --K@rl (talk) 10:31, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    With this, you are implying that any referee, once at work, is a public person. Which is obviously: nonsense. --A.Savin 10:38, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Sehe ich nicht als Nonsens, denn ein Referee, steht eben wie die gesamte Mannschaft in der Öffentlichkeit. --K@rl (talk) 11:06, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
No. If the referee is irrelevant and neither is the match, he is not a public person. It's just like with a street musician: yes, is performing in public, but this alone does not make him a public person, never mind notable for Wikipedia. --A.Savin 18:37, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Wir müssen abwägen, ob der Schiedrichter eines Spiels im Finale im niederösterreichischen Fußballcup Person öffentlichen Interesses ist. Das ist in Österreich nicht gesetzlich geregelt. International spielt der Herr keine Rolle. Überwiegt das "öffentliche Informationsinteresse"? Das ist sicher ein Grenzfall. Bitte weitere Meinungen. Würde eine Zeitung über das Spiel berichten, könnte er kaum etwas gegen das Foto sagen, wir sind aber keine Presse. --Ralf Roletschek 19:31, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete Lukas Baumühlner isn't part of the Austrian professional football and because of that he is definitely not a person of public interest. If he wants it to be deleted, this should be done. --~DorianS~ 16:41, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
nur weil er kein Geld als Profi bekommt, ist er trotzdem in der Öffentlichkeit, wenn er am Fussballplatz steht.---K@rl (talk) 08:02, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
In den NÖN siehe hier auf die schnelle - nicht weiter gesucht. --K@rl (talk) 19:03, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Given that Steindy themselves blurred the subject, I think we can delete the originals as a courtesy and keep the anonymized photos. It's not clear what significant educational value was lost by the blurring. --Storkk (talk) 09:47, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright vandalism from https://boukatsu.or.jp/ Gahukuro (talk) 13:57, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: appears to be below COM:TOO Japan. If I misunderstood the meaning of "copyright vandalism" and the file should be deleted on other grounds, please clarify in a new DR. --Storkk (talk) 09:53, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mr Eric Skerniewski de la société unipersonnelle CLAS a effectivement volé des images sur chantier pour y apposer son logo sans aucun droit et produire des commentaires dénigrants qui n'ont rien à voir avec la réalité. Il le sait très bien et c'est par pur intérêt mercantile qu'il pollue avec de fausses informations différents médias du WEB pour soutenir ses activités avec plongeurs. Ceci dure depuis 10 ans et constitue l' obsession de Mr Skerniewski qui porte ainsi atteinte aux intérêts de ma Société disposant du droit exclusif de produire et vendre la technologie POSIBLOC TM. Ce comportement malhonnête, persistant, malfaisant d'un homme sans foi ni loi est indigne d'un "expert" qui ne respecte rien que son propre intérêt et finira par être condamné par une juridiction compétente s'il n'a pas l'intelligence de mettre fin à ses pratiques mensongères en ce début d'année. Signé: Alain MOUQUET CEO MESURIS SARL. Alain MOUQUET (talk) 16:17, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Le jugement du tribunal de Commerce de Montpellier qui a rejeté toutes les demandes de la société MESURIS représentée par son gérant Monsieur Alain MOUQUET et l'a condamné aux dépens de l’instance est disponible sur simple demande des modérateurs. Le droit à informer est un fait et WIKIMEDIA COMMONS n'est pas une extension du Tribunal de Commerce de Montpellier devant laquelle la société MESURIS ou son gérant peuvent tenter de régler leurs comptes ou exercer de la provocation--Clascertification (talk) 17:01, 4 January 2020 (UTC).[reply]


Deleted: The argument you are both having is unrelated to the end result. We have two criteria for hosting a file: 1) that it is freely licensed by the copyright holder and 2) that it is in scope. This appears likely to be in scope, however it is not possible for us to verify on a public forum the identity of our users. In order for this file to be restored and hosted on Commons, the copyright holder (usually the photographer) should confirm that they are legally able to license the file by following the instructions on OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 09:56, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mr Eric Skerniewski de la société unipersonnelle CLAS a effectivement volé des images sur chantier pour y apposer son logo sans aucun droit et produire des commentaires dénigrants qui n'ont rien à voir avec la réalité. Il le sait très bien et c'est par pur intérêt mercantile qu'il pollue avec de fausses informations différents médias du WEB pour soutenir ses activités avec plongeurs. Ceci dure depuis 10 ans et constitue l' obsession de Mr Skerniewski qui porte ainsi atteinte aux intérêts de ma Société disposant du droit exclusif de produire et vendre la technologie POSIBLOC TM. Ce comportement malhonnête, persistant, malfaisant d'un homme sans foi ni loi est indigne d'un "expert" qui ne respecte rien que son propre intérêt et finira par être condamné par une juridiction compétente s'il n'a pas l'intelligence de mettre fin à ses pratiques mensongères en ce début d'année. Signé: Alain MOUQUET CEO MESURIS SARL. Alain MOUQUET (talk) 16:22, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Le jugement du tribunal de Commerce de Montpellier qui a rejeté toutes les demandes de la société MESURIS représentée par son gérant Monsieur Alain MOUQUET et l'a condamné aux dépens de l’instance est disponible sur simple demande des modérateurs. Le droit à informer est un fait et WIKIMEDIA COMMONS n'est pas une extension du Tribunal de Commerce de Montpellier devant laquelle la société MESURIS ou son gérant peuvent tenter de régler leurs comptes ou exercer de la provocation--Clascertification (talk) 17:00, 4 January 2020 (UTC).[reply]


Deleted: The argument you are both having is unrelated to the end result. We have two criteria for hosting a file: 1) that it is freely licensed by the copyright holder and 2) that it is in scope. This appears likely to be in scope, however it is not possible for us to verify on a public forum the identity of our users. In order for this file to be restored and hosted on Commons, the copyright holder (usually the photographer) should confirm that they are legally able to license the file by following the instructions on OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 09:56, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:00, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Copyright holder is the photographer (and their heirs), not the current inhabitants, unless copyright was transferred. --Storkk (talk) 10:00, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. The uploader has only made one upload, and they give the source as "Home Distiller's Workbook". The Home Distiller Pinterest page features this image as well as others in the same style. Since none of the other diagrams in the same style have been uploaded to Commons, it seems likely that the source for all of them was The Home Distiller. Surachit (talk) 23:53, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, likely copyright violation. --Storkk (talk) 10:04, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Blurry Dta13666 (talk) 03:58, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Nonsense request, user warned. --Achim (talk) 09:26, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doublon avec photo identique MC2solex (talk) 11:33, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Question @MC2solex: I cannot find a duplicate photo - could you please point to it? Otherwise, this could be deleted as a courtesy to you, since you requested deletion within 7 days of uploading... but I don't understand your actual rationale. Storkk (talk) 09:51, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no duplicate found. --Indeedous (talk) 21:11, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No link to connect Gunofficial1998 (talk) 21:52, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per disc. --Indeedous (talk) 21:13, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No link to connect Gunofficial1998 (talk) 21:54, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per disc. --Indeedous (talk) 21:13, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No link to connect Gunofficial1998 (talk) 21:56, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per disc. --Indeedous (talk) 21:13, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No link to connect Gunofficial1998 (talk) 21:56, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per disc. --Indeedous (talk) 21:13, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No link to connect Gunofficial1998 (talk) 21:56, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per disc. --Indeedous (talk) 21:14, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

404 - Not Found Gunofficial1998 (talk) 21:58, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per disc. --Indeedous (talk) 21:14, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

uploaded in a better quality here باسم (talk) 22:04, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: different versions. --Indeedous (talk) 21:15, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No link to connect Gunofficial1998 (talk) 22:12, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per disc. --Indeedous (talk) 21:15, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No link to connect Gunofficial1998 (talk) 22:13, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per disc. --Indeedous (talk) 21:15, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No link to connect Gunofficial1998 (talk) 22:30, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per disc. --Indeedous (talk) 21:16, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Any proof this isn't copyrightable in Serbia? Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:23, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per com:crt The following shall not be deemed works of authorship: 2) Official materials of state bodies and bodies performing public functions. --Indeedous (talk) 14:04, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

IranianCC-BY

[edit]

I uploaded these, somebody else said "Copyright violation" because they have been used by RT/AFP, but the original source appears to be Mehr {{Mehr}} and Fars {{Fars}} making them Creative Commons; it seems RT/AFP simply used the CC-BY photos themselves rather than vice versa, indeed the article the nominator linked to says "Footage released by Iranian media shows the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) capturing a foreign vessel...". The EXIF data also supports that each photo is copyrighted by the Iranian news agency, which clearly states they are released into the Creative Commons. Listing this here instead of just deleting the templates.

--FaNoFtHeAiRiCeLaNd (talk) 07:32, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per nom. --Indeedous (talk) 14:06, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:53, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The author is unknown. The photo was taken before 1922 for the purpose of being published in the journal "Esperanto Triumfonta" where it was published on the third of September 1922. The person shown on the picture placed the order for the photograph and is therefore the original owner of the copyright. He died in 1932. The photo is now part of his private estate. The WIKIMEDIA COMMONS file was created in Germany. I am the grandson of the person depicted in the photograph and the speaker of his heirs. I am therefore today the owner of the copyright. Thomaszwilling (talk) 23:16, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I am interested to learn what the proper license tag would be in this case. It may have to be created. Thomaszwilling (talk) 23:33, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I have now found the source of the right that I claim for this case, namely the right of the heirs at law (Rechtsnachfolger) of the customer/orderer/purchaser (Besteller) of a portrait (Bildnis) to radiate it for non-commercial purposes (nicht zu gewerblichen Zwecken vorgenommene Verbreitung). Unfortunately, I have only access to the German text (UrhG § 60.):
Gesetz über Urheberrecht und verwandte Schutzrechte (Urheberrechtsgesetz), § 60 Bildnisse, (1) Zulässig ist die Vervielfältigung sowie die unentgeltliche und nicht zu gewerblichen Zwecken vorgenommene Verbreitung eines Bildnisses durch den Besteller des Bildnisses oder seinen Rechtsnachfolger oder bei einem auf Bestellung geschaffenen Bildnis durch den Abgebildeten oder nach dessen Tod durch seine Angehörigen oder durch einen im Auftrag einer dieser Personen handelnden Dritten. Thomaszwilling (talk) 17:01, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Here is a SUMMARY of the information available for this file:
Proper information of creation as requested by Eugene Zelenko:
- author: unknown
- date: 1922 or earlier
- country: Germany
Information per article 60 of German copyright law (UrhG):
- type of media: portrait (Bildnis) of a person
- person shown: Friedrich Pillath (Zanoni), died 1932
- customer/orderer/purchaser (Besteller): Friedrich Pillath (Zanoni)
- uploaded by: Thomaszwilling
- heir at law (Rechtsnachfolger) of customer: Thomaszwilling
Additional information:
- published: yes
- publication date: 1922
- published in: Esperanto Triumfonta, 100th edition
- websource: Esperanto Triumfonta, 3.09.1922
Thomaszwilling (talk) 21:58, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per disc. --Indeedous (talk) 14:08, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

F5. Missing essential information Gunofficial1998 (talk) 21:49, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: the only thing missing essential information is this deletion request. --Indeedous (talk) 14:09, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

F5. Missing essential information Gunofficial1998 (talk) 21:49, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: the only thing missing essential information is this deletion request. --Indeedous (talk) 14:09, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

F5. Missing essential information Gunofficial1998 (talk) 21:55, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: the only thing missing essential information is this deletion request. --Indeedous (talk) 14:10, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

F5. Missing essential information Gunofficial1998 (talk) 22:19, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: the only thing missing essential information is this deletion request. --Indeedous (talk) 14:10, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No own work Gunofficial1998 (talk) 21:51, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: small picture, unlikely to be own work. --Indeedous (talk) 14:17, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

F5. Missing essential information Gunofficial1998 (talk) 22:24, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: the only thing missing essential information is this deletion request. --Indeedous (talk) 14:16, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

What are author's dates of life? EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:51, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: André Servier wrote his first books in 1897[3]. We can consider PD-old by the 120 years rule. Ruthven (msg) 22:33, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio. This is from [4] (p. 175). Pls. don't get me wrong. I would prefer keeping over deletion. My intention is to clarify whether such diagrams are above or below TOO. Gretarsson (talk) 19:04, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
“Update”: OK. The File Canis lepophagus timeline.png, which is almost identical and stems from the same source, was nominated for deletion in 2016 and was kept because “plain information is not eligible for copyright”. However, at least there should have been pointed out, that it is not acceptable, that the file is claimed to be ‘own work’ and that the original work and authors are not credited at all! I don’t know how familiar you are with phylogenetic analyses, but it is damn hard work to collect and enter all the data before you eventually can conduct the analysis proper. Hence it is quite cheeky to add some color to a graphic that shows the result of such an analysis (not to mention that this is a time-calibrated tree, i.e. it includes the stratigraphic occurences of the respective taxa, which also has to be researched by its author first!) and claim it as ‘own work’! --Gretarsson (talk) 20:24, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Data are not copyrightable per se in that context. Maybe the schema, but it can be reproduced with wikitext and templates. Ruthven (msg) 22:34, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

license of The Television Pool of Thailand not license of NBT. Gunofficial1998 (talk) 22:44, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: We don't have any Thai-speaking administrators, but best I can tell, NBT is a member of TPT and would have the ability to broadcast this. If you can clarify why this is incorrect, please renominate. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:57, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]