Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/10/20

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive October 20th, 2019


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nous même (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE (fr:Pierre Muzembo ).

Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:58, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:05, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nous même (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE (fr:Pierre Muzembo ).

Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:43, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:04, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nous même (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE (fr:Pierre Muzembo ).

Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:06, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:45, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nous même (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE.

Ahmadtalk 15:29, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 17:48, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small, low res, no metadata. Unlikely to be own work. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:28, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and has been speedied. --FitIndia Talk Mail 17:26, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Vandalism-only image DannyS712 (talk) 09:10, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 13:55, 20 Oktober 2019 UTC: Copyright violation: DW of Getty image: https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/matthewzeitlin/oslo-freedom-forum-founder-says-thiel-has-every-right --Krdbot 19:08, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hamza Alanbaky (talk · contribs)

[edit]

all images marked as cc0 but are from either facebook or news sites with copyright notices at the bottom, I checked the source on most of the images and none of the show that they are CC0

CodeLyoko (talk) 22:30, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Speedy deleted. Copyvios. --Majora (talk) 22:40, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i do not need Gani Gashi piktor (talk) 23:43, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Majora. Masum Reza📞 00:38, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio. Seeing those copyvio notices on the uploader's talk page, I highly doubt that this is an Own work. Masum Reza📞 22:32, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Speedily deleted by ~riley. Masum Reza📞 02:11, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation Gahukuro (talk) 15:39, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Taivo at 06:44, 21 Oktober 2019 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1): small photo without metadata, the user's last remaining upload --Krdbot 13:08, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

obvious copyvio DHN (talk) 23:40, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 06:36, 21 Oktober 2019 UTC: Copyright violation: COM:CSD#F1, License review NOT passed: No evidence of a free license at the claimed source. --Krdbot 13:08, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader disagree so a regular DR instead. Found at http://www.mishaquintcello.com/ Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:05, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion Request Appeal  Keep @Patrick Rogel I took the photo of Quint_Cellist2.jpg File:Quint_Cellist2.jpg myself and it is under the creative commons free use license. Please remove the speedy deletion request. Please let me know if you have any questions. User:llewcellist — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2601:581:4600:3910:1176:AD41:576C:5EC2 (talk) 22:07, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Llewcellist: No, website is © 2017 MISHA QUINT, not Creative Commons. Photographers are DAVID MILKIS and ABBY GAUDETTE. If you are one of them please send a permission via COM:OTRS. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:25, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Patrick Rogel: Thank you for your reply. I have just filled out the OTRS request by email. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2601:581:4600:3910:1176:AD41:576C:5EC2 (talk) 00:18, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Ticket:2019102110000129. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 10:54, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture of a newspaper, clearly violation copyright 212.187.67.146 06:46, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Joy sagar Murmu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused person photo. OOS.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 06:46, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:58, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Joy sagar Murmu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photo(s). Out of scope.

Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 12:46, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 05:28, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not notable persons Frullatore Tostapane (talk) 07:01, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:58, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not notable persons Frullatore Tostapane (talk) 07:05, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:58, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not notable persons Frullatore Tostapane (talk) 07:06, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:58, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not notable persons Frullatore Tostapane (talk) 07:07, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:58, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not notable persons Frullatore Tostapane (talk) 07:08, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:58, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not notable persons Frullatore Tostapane (talk) 07:10, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:58, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not notable persons Frullatore Tostapane (talk) 07:11, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:58, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not notable persons Frullatore Tostapane (talk) 07:11, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:58, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE - COM:SELFIE DannyS712 (talk) 09:13, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:59, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An unused and uncategorised image. Out of the project scope? Estopedist1 (talk) 09:19, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:59, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality. An unused and uncategorised image. Looks like some sort of personal artwork. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 09:21, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:59, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I think this is not own work. The author is specified in the lower right corner (I see: Фото: А. Ст<…>ко, perhaps Фото: А. Степаненко/Photo by A. Stepanenko). Also uploader is the person depicted at this photograph, therefore she can't be an author. FITY CHANGE (talk) 07:56, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:28, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File uses Google Maps with bad liciense, good liciense has OpenStreetMap. See w:ru:Википедия:Примеры неоправданного использования несвободных изображений#1+. 217.117.125.72 11:23, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:33, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Anna aidovna (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии: фото сделаны более 45 лет назад, автор, скорее всего, неизвестен, фото оцифрованы в наше время. Необходимо обращение в OTRS.

Dogad75 (talk) 17:51, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:41, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии: автором указан ГБАТД, метаданных нет, фотограф, скорее всего, неизвестен. Необходимо обращение в OTRS Dogad75 (talk) 18:56, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:42, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image shows a copyrighted work of modern architecture located in Germany. Freedom of panorama is not applicable as the photograph was taken indoors. Gnom (talk) 20:40, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 22:37, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfortunately, Germany does not have freedom of panorama for interiors. Gnom (talk) 19:04, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Good to know. Fine for me to delete it. There are three more in that category that might be problematic. -- B2Belgium (talk) 19:45, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:34, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Although the photograph may be released in the public domain, the subject fanzines do not have any information about their copyright status. By default they are copyrighted and as these fanzines are the subject of the photo, de minimis does not apply. Whpq (talk) 19:17, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:33, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probably copyvio, see description. No EXIF-data. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 19:18, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:32, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sankeshwarmhatre (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE, self-promo.

Ahmadtalk 20:22, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:27, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

seen the other images are *not* own work, I challenge these three images too Edoderoo (talk) 20:28, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:27, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

seen the other images are *not* own work, I challenge these three images too Edoderoo (talk) 20:28, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:27, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

seen the other images are *not* own work, I challenge these three images too Edoderoo (talk) 20:28, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:27, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All files from same user, who uploaded 8 files, two of which are deleted. The other 6 are in this category, two have exif from differnt cameras the others are without exif, the file dimensions look, as if taken from web sites. The fotos have been taken at random but very different places. the category stated that this model ist from a prevecture of Japan and from Brazil. Only a single foto from each event.

C.Suthorn (talk) 20:51, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:26, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alama32 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low-re images of the same person over the yearsand the places: unlikely to be own works.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:08, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 04:50, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alama32 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Author is claimed to be Luc Eymael but is also in the picture. Leopards.jpg was previously published on [1] and [2].

The photographer(s) should send permission to OTRS.

- Alexis Jazz ping plz 21:05, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:25, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alama32 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low-re images, no metadata, unlikely to be own works. Some of them from http://www.luceymael.be/galerie.html

Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:20, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:25, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sagar17101985 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE.

Ahmadtalk 21:25, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:23, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status: ©2003 Allan Tannenbaum on EXIF at Flickr. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:02, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:22, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии: фото 2015 года, без метаданных, по описанию-личная фотография персоны, необходимо обращение в OTRS. Dogad75 (talk) 22:08, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:36, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Catherine darley (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Nelly Marez-Darley died in 2001. No OTRS.

Chassipress (talk) 22:50, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:38, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии: персона на фотографии и фотограф-одно и тоже лицо. Dogad75 (talk) 23:34, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:37, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

obvious copyvio: https://2sao.vn/ngan-ngo-voi-seri-anh-moi-day-goi-cam-cua-dong-nhi-n-37092.html DHN (talk) 23:41, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:20, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obvious scan from book; no info on copyright status of original nor justification for claimed cc license. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:41, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:20, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DW; scan from book. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:45, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:20, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DW, scan of book pages. Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:46, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:20, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DW, scan of book pages. Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:47, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:20, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DW, scan of book pages. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:47, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:20, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work; scan. Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:48, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:20, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private drawing album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:29, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:54, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of image. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:54, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of https://www.facebook.com/IdealGirlOfficial/photos/pcb.1914513648826507/1914513332159872/?type=3&theater Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:54, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:49, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope -selfie Mindmatrix 16:06, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:53, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-re image, unlikely to be own work. Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:08, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:53, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

en:User:EasyLiveTrade software was globally locked as spam-only account. Probably its logo is out of project scope. The company is not mentioned in en.wiki. Taivo (talk) 16:23, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:53, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a famous historical picture and it's highly unlikely the uploader is the author of this picture as claimed (If 1984 is a birth year the author would have been 9 years old at the time this picture was taken, which is too young to take a picture like this.). OTRS permission is required. 109.91.39.4 19:02, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:52, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by К.Лаврентьев (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible copyright violation. File don't have information about first publication.

Maxinvestigator (talk) 11:13, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 13:06, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by К.Лаврентьев (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Derivative works, no FoP in both Russia and Ukraine for modern sculpture.

Komarof (talk) 13:10, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 23:10, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files with no exif data, hence dubious authorship.

— Racconish💬 18:19, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: done by ~riley. --Jianhui67 TC 14:00, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An unused and uncategorised image. Looks like some sort of personal artwork. Related to file:Dead-End World 0001.ogv Estopedist1 (talk) 12:48, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:47, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An unused and uncategorised video. Out of the project scope? Estopedist1 (talk) 12:49, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:47, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not relevant with an encyclopedia content. CoffeeEngineer (talk) 13:09, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:48, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

scope? Just a noise Estopedist1 (talk) 13:53, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:48, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE Ahmadtalk 14:30, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:49, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Asa7 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Very very poor lighting. OOS as the object can't be seen clearly in the files. Clearer files in Category:Lego brick

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:38, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:49, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:59, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 14:01, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by U3143168 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:01, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 14:01, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

blurry; similar photo exists at File:Oshawa Station (27634139935).jpg Mindmatrix 01:13, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:57, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no camera metadata. Most probably the uploader is not the author. No Permission. Микола Василечко (talk) 10:05, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:59, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ankit8968Soni (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Screenshots.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:32, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Might also be found on https://sci.gov.in/chief-justice-judges . --Túrelio (talk) 15:50, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Deleted by Christian Ferrer. --Gbawden (talk) 13:00, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Zahrasheikhi88 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small, low res, no metadata. Unlikely to be own work.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:27, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:01, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a photo of a wall poster, so "own work" seems very unlikely Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:33, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:02, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bibliodrome (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:03, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; taken from FB per MD. --Gbawden (talk) 13:02, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:22, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:02, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possibly cropped from a larger file of what seems to be a selfie of the subject (林沛笭). (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:13, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:52, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP in Philippines. Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:48, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and good afternoon from hereat Bulacan Philippines; thanks for your message, I respectfully submit and have no objection to the deletionJudgefloro 05:00, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 20:20, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This category is unfortunately doubled: see Category:Alte_Burg_(Frankfurt-Praunheim). br --Commander-pirx (talk) 19:19, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Achim (talk) 22:20, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
The user is not admin here and the issue is not related to this wiki. The same reason why the page at Meta was deleted. -- Tegel (talk) 16:08, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Tegel: Where else am I suggested to put it then? Bbb23 has vandalized Wikipedia, but I can't put this report “where it belongs”, because “where it belongs” is Bbb23's power territory. --Handroid7 (talk) 19:57, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I have explained on your Meta talk page the options that you have. Don't bring this issue cross-wiki so that you get blocked for cross-wiki abuse. -- Tegel (talk) 20:52, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I don't intend to bring the issue cross-wiki. This is just a document. Does that mean that there is no way for me to publicly document and uncover the abusive practices of an English Wikipedia moderator? Does that mean that anyone who uncovers counter-productive and abusive behaviours of people we are supposed to trust (.i.e. Bbb23) does risk being blocked globally? ––Handroid7 (talk) 22:00, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Tegel: Can you cite an official policy of Wikimedia Commons that states that this page is not allowed here? --Handroid7 (talk) 22:04, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The relevant policy is Commons:Project scope/Pages, galleries and categories#User pages, galleries and categories: “User pages are generally reserved for personal profiles and information relevant to the user's contributions to Commons.” and “Content that does not advance Commons' aims, including advertising or excessive linking to external domains and anything apparently created and/or uploaded for the purpose of vandalism or attack” --Count Count (talk) 08:44, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Count Count: First of all, as already stated, that page is not a personal attack page, but a factual, verifiable document. Also, a part of Commons:Project_scope#Aim_of_Wikimedia_Commons states “…that acts as a common repository for the various projects of the Wikimedia Foundation.”, including Wikipedia. The document is also informative, which is also stated there. --Handroid7 (talk) 19:29, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Of course it is an attack page. You are casting aspersions (“Why would he delete it, if he could? Maybe to cover up something shady about him?”) and include outright personal attacks (“Shady practices” and “ran amok...”).
Also your quote is misleading, the text preceding it is “The aim of Wikimedia Commons is to provide a media file repository:...”. Your text is not a media file and it is not in the main repository but on a user page, so the policy previously quoted by my applies.
In any case I will not further comment here. I am certain that this page will be deleted. --Count Count (talk) 19:47, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete. An attack page designed to export wikidrama from English Wikipedia to other wikis. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 19:17, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • @NinjaRobotPirate: No, it is legitimate criticism, according to the policy quoted in the disclaimer section. Also, it is not intended to bring “WikiDrama” to Commons. It is just a place to host this legitimate report. Do you have any suggestions for where else I can put it? --Handroid7 (talk) 19:55, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • Bbb23 has silenced my sincere and formal conversation on the English Wikipedia using his administrative tools. Have you read this report? Don't you think that Bbb23 has abused his administratorship? --Handroid7 (talk) 19:55, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Move to Meta One of the purposes of Meta is to provide a forum when the local wiki is failing to do so, regardless of the reason why. Fram was allowed to discuss his en:wp ban on Meta, therefore so should others. Commons doesn't have a similar purpose. I suggest that you change the way you represent your evidence though, because when it looks like an attack page, it will be viewed as one, even when it isn't. Also, it is probably more productive to focus on the question whether ignore all rules and assume good faith should in all cases be trumped by blocking policies, than to single out one administrator. Guido den Broeder (talk) 21:10, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Move to meta as noted above, there is a place for presentations such as these. Serial Number 54129 (talk) 18:34, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of scope. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:32, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This 15 July 2019 file is a duplicate of THIS file (''Mausoleo Bomberos de Ponce, Cementerio Civil, Barrio Portugués Urbano, Ponce, Puerto Rico (DSC05401).jpg") which I uploaded 6 years earlier, on 27 April 2013‎, but missing the informative file ref number in parenthesis. Mercy11 (talk) 02:46, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: INUSE, processed as a duplicate. --Gbawden (talk) 07:07, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Damaged file Ibrahim Husain Meraj (talk) 03:21, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:07, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no camera metadata. Most probably the uploader is not the author. No Permission. Микола Василечко (talk) 10:07, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; also found on https://lifeinua.info/jan-tombinski-european-union-stands-firm-to-support-ukraine/ etc. --Gbawden (talk) 07:11, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermark 'VS photography ©' does not match name of photographer listed at 500px - suspect this may be a case of licence washing. MPF (talk) 11:12, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Stefano Bodini presents himself as a member of VS photography, does not look like license washing.-- Darwin Ahoy! 20:12, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep - thanks; hadn't spotted that! - MPF (talk) 10:53, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per MPF. --Gbawden (talk) 07:09, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Imre Kertész by Csaba Segesvári

[edit]

No permission from the photographer in OTRS. --Regasterios (talk) 16:49, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:14, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The only Wikipedia page this image was used on has been removed. Mapet318 (talk) 20:00, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: INUSE at wikidata, could be used at NO wiki. --Gbawden (talk) 07:15, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad mood of image OptoScalpel (talk) 12:11, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Kept.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:04, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I do not agree with usage of this photo over Internet. OptoScalpel (talk) 08:19, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Herby talk thyme 16:48, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad mood of image OptoScalpel (talk) 12:10, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Kept.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:04, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I do not agree with usage of this photo over Internet. OptoScalpel (talk) 08:19, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Herby talk thyme 16:48, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad mood of image OptoScalpel (talk) 12:11, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

??? What do you mean? How can an image be in bad mood? --PaterMcFly (talk) 06:41, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kept.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:03, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I do not agree with usage of this photo over Internet. OptoScalpel (talk) 08:20, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Herby talk thyme 16:48, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no camera metadata. Most probably the uploader is not the author. No Permission. Микола Василечко (talk) 10:03, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 16:47, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no camera metadata. Most probably the uploader is not the author. No Permission. Микола Василечко (talk) 10:06, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 16:47, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no camera metadata. Most probably the uploader is not the author. No Permission. Микола Василечко (talk) 10:07, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 16:47, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to Tineye, it was already availalble on the Vtélé website in 2013, one year before the photo was uploaded and I do ntot currently see any autorisation of reuse on their website. CoffeeEngineer (talk) 13:29, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 16:46, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hanataturi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 16:45, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright infringement. Check this Edjoerv (talk) 15:24, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 16:44, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

with watermark, signature, markup, editor tries self-disclosure on Wikipedia. Even failed puppet attempts (com marca d'água, assinatura, marcação, editor tenta auto-divulgação na Wikipédia. Inclusive, tentativas frustradas com fantoches) O revolucionário aliado (talk) 19:08, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 16:43, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

with watermark, signature, markup, editor tries self-disclosure on Wikipedia. Even failed puppet attempts (com marca d'água, assinatura, marcação, editor tenta auto-divulgação na Wikipédia. Inclusive, tentativas frustradas com fantoches) O revolucionário aliado (talk) 19:11, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 16:43, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

with watermark, signature, markup, editor tries self-disclosure on Wikipedia. Even failed puppet attempts (com marca d'água, assinatura, marcação, editor tenta auto-divulgação na Wikipédia. Inclusive, tentativas frustradas com fantoches) O revolucionário aliado (talk) 19:12, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 16:42, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

with watermark, signature, markup, editor tries self-disclosure on Wikipedia. Even failed puppet attempts (com marca d'água, assinatura, marcação, editor tenta auto-divulgação na Wikipédia. Inclusive, tentativas frustradas com fantoches) O revolucionário aliado (talk) 19:12, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 16:42, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

with watermark, signature, markup, editor tries self-disclosure on Wikipedia. Even failed puppet attempts (com marca d'água, assinatura, marcação, editor tenta auto-divulgação na Wikipédia. Inclusive, tentativas frustradas com fantoches) O revolucionário aliado (talk) 19:13, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 16:42, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

with watermark, signature, markup, editor tries self-disclosure on Wikipedia. Even failed puppet attempts (com marca d'água, assinatura, marcação, editor tenta auto-divulgação na Wikipédia. Inclusive, tentativas frustradas com fantoches) O revolucionário aliado (talk) 19:13, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 16:42, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

with watermark, signature, markup, editor tries self-disclosure on Wikipedia. Even failed puppet attempts (com marca d'água, assinatura, marcação, editor tenta auto-divulgação na Wikipédia. Inclusive, tentativas frustradas com fantoches) O revolucionário aliado (talk) 19:14, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 16:42, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

with watermark, signature, markup, editor tries self-disclosure on Wikipedia. Even failed puppet attempts (com marca d'água, assinatura, marcação, editor tenta auto-divulgação na Wikipédia. Inclusive, tentativas frustradas com fantoches) O revolucionário aliado (talk) 19:14, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 16:42, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

with watermark, signature, markup, editor tries self-disclosure on Wikipedia. Even failed puppet attempts (com marca d'água, assinatura, marcação, editor tenta auto-divulgação na Wikipédia. Inclusive, tentativas frustradas com fantoches) O revolucionário aliado (talk) 19:15, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 16:42, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

with watermark, signature, markup, editor tries self-disclosure on Wikipedia. Even failed puppet attempts (com marca d'água, assinatura, marcação, editor tenta auto-divulgação na Wikipédia. Inclusive, tentativas frustradas com fantoches) O revolucionário aliado (talk) 19:20, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 16:41, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

with watermark, signature, markup, editor tries self-disclosure on Wikipedia. Even failed puppet attempts (com marca d'água, assinatura, marcação, editor tenta auto-divulgação na Wikipédia. Inclusive, tentativas frustradas com fantoches) O revolucionário aliado (talk) 19:21, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 16:41, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyviol Frullatore Tostapane (talk) 06:51, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 16:50, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyviol Frullatore Tostapane (talk) 06:53, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 16:50, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Wikimedia-globalblock.svg (meets CSD F8, duplicate also an SVG fraud) Calvinkulittc 02:41, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Not the same, one has a larger cross. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:11, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • These files are similar but they are not duplicates.  Delete and redirect it to File:Wikimedia-globalblock.svg because 1. This is a fake SVG and a better file is available. 2. Global blocks are for IP address and global locks are for user accounts. These are basically same thing.
I see no reason to keep this version. Masum Reza📞 23:05, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Not identical duplicates. Both versions are used by different projects (please replace the images first, since Commons should not dictate which images different project uses). I don't see any need to delete one out of a "storage perspecive". --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 17:22, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free logo: No TOO in Venezuela AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 03:40, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 17:23, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The description page states cc-by-3.0, but the end of the video states that this is available under cc-by-nc-sa. Which one are we to believe?

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:09, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - The video clearly has an NC license. The YouTube license cannot change that. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:14, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced by image (thumb|The village Drakia on Mount Pilion, Greece, cicra 1900.), which is more clean. Flashdart2 (talk) 02:09, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Well, new image is without the stamps and a bit bigger. I don't know if the fact that it is a cart postal with stamps and thus a bit different can be a reason to be kept. --C messier (talk) 07:42, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:15, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced by File:Stefanos Stournaras Drakia c1900.jpg Metallos (talk) 04:17, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment The file has been nominated before for the same reason, and it was kept, as it was considered by user:Jameslwoodward as not a valid reason for deletion. --C messier (talk) 16:06, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion - Again, the images with and without the stamps are different, so both should be kept. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:38, 15 February 2021 (UTC). .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:38, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be uploader's own work. Subject died in 1984, photo appears to date to 1950s-1960s --Animalparty (talk) 02:15, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is a picture of my uncle. It was originally taken by his wife, and my aunt. Hoppyh (talk) 02:50, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Then you aunt owns the copyright and she, or her heir, must send a free license using OTRS. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:16, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for graphic works in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 02:50, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:16, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for graphic works like mural in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 03:09, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the information, A1Cafel. What about all the other pictures of Banksy street art in the UK and the many other pictures of same type? There are lots of categories with many pictures of murals. Do they all have to be deleted?Thilo Parg (talk) 04:23, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - see https://theconversation.com/banksy-finally-goes-to-court-to-stop-unauthorised-merchandising-despite-saying-copyright-is-for-losers-112390. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:18, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely copyright violation; there is no OTRS or any indication that the author of the image has given permission to upload this image to Wikimedia Commons. The copyright page at http://solarviews.com/eng/copyright.htm explicitly states that his full-resolution images shall not be copied to other sites such as Commons. Nrco0e (talk) 03:48, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

But in the original image says the copyright owner is "Calvin J. Hamilton", not NASA. Paladinum2 (talk) 21:25, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The question is whether Calvin J. Hamilton has any right to claim copyright? It was undoubtedly the Voyager probe which took the image, so what did Hamilton do that would generate copyright? Huntster (t @ c) 21:47, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The same image can be found in the NASA photojournal with NASA/JPL credit. Ruslik (talk) 21:02, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Ruslik0, can you link it please? I'm unable to find any such image. By my understanding, Hamilton claims copyright because he took a black and white image of Ariel (and other similar images) and colourised them. I personally do not feel such a simple act should generate a new copyright, but historically Commons has placed a fairly low threshold on such things. Huntster (t @ c) 01:46, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I meant similar images. Hamilton created a mosaic from several images in case of Ariel. In addition, it is not clear if the images were made as part of his employment. Ruslik (talk) 09:45, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
In case of Oberon the Hamilton's picture is actually indistinguishable from https://solarsystem.nasa.gov/moons/uranus-moons/oberon/in-depth/ Ruslik (talk) 10:08, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm. Lot of unknowns. In the case of Oberon, I could see those two images being based on the same base photo(set), but I wonder how he got access to the higher resolution files used in the images we have here (I certainly couldn't put together our Ariel image with what I've seen available on the web) and why he feels the images on his site so specifically warrant their own copyright. Huntster (t @ c) 12:52, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I think that the Oberon image was simply resized and some sharpening filters applied to it. I do not think that any higher resolution images exist. The ultimate source of all image data is Voyager EDRs. Ruslik (talk) 18:31, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Hamilton is not a NASA employee and it is well established that colorizing creates a new copyright. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:21, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is a lie. Hamilton did not colorize this image. Ruslik (talk) 14:26, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely copyright violation; there is no OTRS or any indication that the author of the image has given permission to upload this image to Wikimedia Commons. The copyright page at http://solarviews.com/eng/copyright.htm explicitly states that his full-resolution images shall not be copied to other sites such as Commons. Nrco0e (talk) 03:49, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Hamilton is not a NASA employee and it is well established that colorizing creates a new copyright. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:24, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is a lie. Hamilton did not colorize this image. Ruslik (talk) 14:26, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine. Building after 1990. No Permission from the architect. Микола Василечко (talk) 06:17, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:24, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in UAE (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 06:43, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:25, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Saudi Arabia (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 06:45, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:25, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image has been originally uploaded to Russian Wikipedia from http://award.adm.gov.ru with no photographer's permission. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:18, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:27, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work: copied from not own work: copied from https://www.ordinedisantacaterina.it/# Bradipo Lento (talk) 07:56, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:27, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP for 3D sculptures in the USA.

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 07:57, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:27, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am tot satisfied with this photo's usage over Internet. OptoScalpel (talk) 08:14, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:29, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am tot satisfied with this photo's usage over Internet. OptoScalpel (talk) 08:15, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:29, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am tot satisfied with usage of this photo over Internet. OptoScalpel (talk) 08:16, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:29, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am tot satisfied with usage of this photo over Internet. OptoScalpel (talk) 08:17, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:30, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am tot satisfied with usage of this photo over Internet. OptoScalpel (talk) 08:17, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:30, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am tot satisfied with usage of this photo over Internet. OptoScalpel (talk) 08:17, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:30, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I do not agree with usage of this photo over Internet. OptoScalpel (talk) 08:18, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:30, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I do not agree with usage of this photo over Internet. OptoScalpel (talk) 08:18, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:30, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I do not agree with usage of this photo over Internet. OptoScalpel (talk) 08:19, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - The license is irrevocable. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:30, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Imported without OTRS autorization. Lyon-St-Clair (talk) 09:38, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:31, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fictional / contra-factual diagram data mislabelled and therefore misleading: Almost none of these party names/initialisms actually exists/existed; in 1955 Portugal was ruled as a single-party regime; there’s not even enough seats for 300 assemblypeople in the Portuguese Parliament. If used/useful, then rename, otherwise  delete. See also the uploader’s talk page for several other (sucessful) DRs, affecting similar diagrams which were however less egregious in that they were not labelled in a misleading way, indicating a fictional country name: This shows how this one file is especially pernicious as it is, since even an avid DR poster was fooled by its misleading filename, believing it to be genuine. -- Tuválkin 10:07, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:31, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no camera metadata. Most probably the uploader is not the author. No Permission. Микола Василечко (talk) 10:08, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:31, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Potentially confusing redirect name that has (almost) nothing to do with the target file. Primefac (talk) 10:58, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:32, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://pxhere.com/id/photo/869175 states the license is CC0 and not CC-SA 4.0. https://pixabay.com/photos/cheerleader-cheer-park-girl-female-863890/ states this is under "Pixabay License" and not under CC-SA 4.0. Hence I don't think that the uploader actually checked or understood licenses. Malyacko (talk) 12:27, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - Changed license to CC-0, added licensereview and source. Note that the pixabay license permits commercial use without attribution so is more or less equivalent to the CC-0 seen on pxhere. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:37, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

needless WikiFreibeuter (talk) 12:28, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:38, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It can be seen from the exif that the original source is facebook, which may not be the uploader’s own work. Catherine Laurence discussion 13:00, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Original source is her Instagram here. I have got her aproval by e-mail. Where I can send? She is our hero. Our school and community. This pic is important, because she is in school uniform with our symbols. It was a few years ago, today she is university student, and we can't make same picture again. She agreed, no one would question copyright. I've got this e-mail. This is her adress: [email protected] (from her Instagram profile). You can confirm my words. And here is the screen of this e-mail with her short answer ”yes, no problem” about this photo.WrS.tm.pl (talk) 13:09, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: The subject does not generally have the right to freely license an image. The actual photographer must send a free license using OTRS. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:40, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Blurry Cjstepney (talk) 05:23, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: This file is in use on en:Husayn ibn Ali. COM:INUSE says that if it's good enough for English Wikipedia, it's good enough for Commons. --bjh21 (talk) 18:29, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 07:59, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurry, unused, and plenty of better quality alternatives in Category:Minbar in Cave of the Patriarchs. HyperGaruda (talk) 13:12, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May delete.Md iet (talk) 13:17, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion - not tack sharp, but very different colors. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:43, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Drawings by
Cornelis Jetses  (1873–1955) wikidata:Q2049192
 
Cornelis Jetses
Alternative names
C. Jetses
Description Dutch illustrator, cover artist, painter, printmaker and poster artist
Date of birth/death 23 June 1873 Edit this at Wikidata 9 June 1955 Edit this at Wikidata
Location of birth/death Groningen Wassenaar
Work period 1885 Edit this at Wikidata–1955 Edit this at Wikidata
Work location
Groningen (1885–September 1894); Zeist (1909–1919); Amsterdam (October 1895–1897); Bremen (1897–1909); Bremen (September 1894–October 1895); Wassenaar (1938–1955); Scheveningen (1938) Edit this at Wikidata
Authority file
creator QS:P170,Q2049192
, won't be public domain until 2026

Vera (talk) 14:01, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Publisher J.B. Wolters bought the copyright of the original version of this reading board at the beginning of the 20th century, and published the 5th version of this board around 1902. For a new edition (sold between 1910 and 1916) the publisher commissioned J. Ligthart and H. Scheepstra to adapt the design, and Cornelis Jetses to make new illustrations. The successor of the publisher, Wolters Noordhoff, always made clear Wolters Noordhoff owned copyright. To check this I sent emails to the expert on these Dutch reading boads, and to the successor of the publisher. Vysotsky (talk) 15:57, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete (undelete in 2026) Jetses apparently sold his copyright to publisher Wolters Noordhoff. The copyright on these images will, according to the Dutch Copyright Act, last till 31 December 2025 (70 years after Jetses' death). The archives of Noordhoff publishers are transferred to Onderwijsmuseum in Dordrecht. From an email by Onderwijsmuseum: "De beeldrechten berusten bij Noordhoff en worden beheerd door CPLG." (my translation:) The rights on these drawings are with Noordhoff Publishers [until 31 Dec. 2025] and will be enforced by CPLG. Vysotsky (talk) 08:33, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
thank you for checking that. I think there are a fair few more photos of "Aap Noot Mies" in the "leesplankje" category. 2026 isn't too far away fortunately. Going to be a pretty gem at that year's Public Domain Day. Vera (talk) 16:54, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:45, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lluisgib (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Complex logos. Should be sourced and relicensed if in public domain.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:37, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:45, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Luan as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: A imagem é um emblema de um partido político brasileiro e a fonte (nem a página inicial dela) não trata de qualquer informação sobre licenciamento da imagem, quanto mais em termos livres.
Converted by me to regular DR to allow for discussion, as logo had been on Commons since 5 years. -- Túrelio (talk) 14:39, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Also: File:PSB.gif --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:58, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Clearly above TOO, bogus licensing. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:58, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:45, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW, needs OTRS permission. Ahmadtalk 14:47, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:45, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found here, and it seems that the file has been edited. I'm not sure if it's {{PD-Old}} or not. Ahmadtalk 14:56, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:46, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Hong Kong for graphic works.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:03, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:46, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by नीलम (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Apparently the author is this guy: Category:Ramdhari Singh Dinkar. The license is wrong and this is not public domain.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:04, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

HI, Magog the Ogre This file File:सौ अजान और एक सुजान.djvu is copyright free according to low of India which was published in 1944. And the author of this book has died in 1914. नीलम (talk) 04:32, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I struck that one. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 11:47, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:33, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by GStojanov (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical books. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The first book File:Kuzman Shapkarev Pyrvonachalni Poznanija za Malechkite Dechinja.pdf is printed in 1868, and the second File:Naravnoucitelni soveti.jpg in 1858 so they are more than 100 years old and the copyright is expired. GStojanov (talk) 13:55, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I updated both pages with the requested information. Please remove the delete flag. GStojanov (talk) 19:22, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:25, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by GStojanov (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Why USA law was applied to documents created in Macedonia/Yugoslavia?

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:34, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: These are to a government, not from it, so the copyright remains with the writer(s). .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:50, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by GStojanov (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical publications. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:27, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I added a description in English: "Periodic publication that was discontinued in 1947. It was prepared and printed in Sofia, Bulgaria. Contributors were state officials, party leaders and intellectuals from both Bulgaria and Macedonia (then part of Yugoslavia)" GStojanov (talk)


Deleted: per nomination. Licence tag have not been correct (i.e. {{Cc-by-sa-2.5}} is inappropriate as licence). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 17:03, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cirillo747 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos, maps, postcard. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:50, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cirillo747 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos and painting. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:51, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is from a YouTube thumbnail, see the first result. It's not a screenshot of the video, nor this image appears in the video. YouTube speaks nothing of thumbnails in their copyright section, it only refers to videos. Frodar (talk) 16:02, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:52, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i have created this and want to delete it as the person in the picture does not want her image online Semra Eren-Nijhar (talk) 19:42, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - notable author, the license is irrevocable. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:54, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurry, unused image. It has been replaced by numerous higher-quality images during the last 15 years. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:32, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment -- It looks more like a lighting issue than anything else. Also, I don't see the replacements. ----DanTD (talk) 21:46, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
There are, by my count, eleven other images of the Green Line platforms in Category:Park Street station - most of which are also much more useful angles, in addition to the superior quality. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:18, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - also probably a dw of a probably copyrighted poster. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:01, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Chabe01 (talk · contribs)

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 21:58, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. These are all derivatives of modern architecture (and a sign) in France. France's Freedom of Panorama exemption is non-commercial only, which is not compatible with our licensing policy. --Storkk (talk) 12:32, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Chabe01 (talk · contribs)

More images that violate France's lack of FOP

Elisfkc (talk) 18:19, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment This in no way is the extent of all of this user's violations of FOP, nor did I check for who designed each building/bridge/sign. This is merely the extent of the structures that look to be too modern to be in the public domain in France that the user has uploaded from 2016-05-17 through the time of the nomination. Elisfkc (talk) 18:23, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment I could see a de minimis argument for keeping a bunch of these... I'll look more in detail when I have some time. Storkk (talk) 19:52, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Êtes-vous sérieux ? je vois qu'une cabine téléphonique de type "France Télécom" est considérée comme soumise à copyright. Demandez l'avis d'administrateurs français avant de vous lancer dans ces suppressions (Are you serious? I see that a phone box of type(chap) "France Télécom" is considered as subjected(submitted) to copyright. Ask for the opinion(notice) of French administrators(directors) before throwing(launching) to you in these abolitions(deletions)). --François GOGLINS (talk) 13:48, 13 June 2016 (UTC).[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion for so many files in one nomination, especially with nothing better than suspicion of age. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:17, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Chabe01 (talk · contribs)

No COM:FOP in France, sculptor's permission needed via COM:OTRS.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:08, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above, minus 2. ~riley (talk) 03:53, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Chabe01 (talk · contribs)

No COM:FOP in France (again). When user will understand?

Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:46, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:01, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Chabe01 (talk · contribs)

Copyrighted work by Édouard Manchuelle (d. 1984), permission of his heirs needed via COM:OTRS.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:24, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:39, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Chabe01 (talk · contribs)

Who is the sculptor? Permission?

Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:44, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:39, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Chabe01 (talk · contribs)

No COM:FOP in France. Who are the sculptors? Permission of their heirs needed via COM:OTRS.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:09, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The author of the war memorial of Resistance is unknown and it is the municipality of Nogent-sur-Marne. Hence, it can't be deleted. Besides, the war memorial was made by Charles Billon in 1926 and died before 1950.
The request was made without any check and I am a bit circumspect about that. Chabe01 (talk) 06:41, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
To my knowledge there's no architect or sculptor named Charles billon who worked for the City of Nogent-sur-Marne. May uploader disclose his source? The same way it's very unlikely that the author of a 1950's work paid by a municipality is anonym. Besides it's up to the uploader to provide accurate informations proving that the work is public domain, not to the nominator. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:34, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:17, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Chabe01 (talk · contribs)

Derivative works of non-free signs/posters. Some files have had blurring applied, but the extent of the blurring is not sufficient to remove the non-free copyrightable authorship. The copyrighted works form a significant portion of the derivative works and are intentionally included in the images, so COM:DM France does not apply. There is no FoP in France.

AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 02:54, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 21:59, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Chabe01 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The building shown is w:fr:Maison des Hommes et des Techniques, built in 1917 and authored by René Ménard, who died in 1958. As there is no commercial freedom of panorama in France (see COM:FOP France), this architectural work is still under his posthumous copyright and is unfree. Copyright expires on January 1, 2029 (70+1 years after his death), at which point these photos will be restored/undeleted.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 22:49, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:37, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It says in the flickr page: "Divulgação" which means the uploader is not the owner, he is publishing someone else image. Paladinum2 (talk) 21:58, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Disagree. "Divulgação" means the uploader is not the owner of the image for who? You? Chronus (talk) 23:12, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
It's quite simple, in Brasil we use "Foto: name of the owner" normally, You can see as an example, the "Palácio do Planalto" ones. If it was created by Rede Brasil Atual, it whould be "Foto: Rede Brasil Atual" or "Foto: Someone/Rede Brasil Atual". "Divulgação" means it is Disclosing an image from somewhere else. FOr example you can see this image Here. This page is also not the owner, so it uses "divulgação" or "reprodução", you can also see it used here and here too. It's quite common in the news. Paladinum2 (talk) 02:36, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:03, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Blanka Smolková (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyrighted work by František Smolka (d. 1974), permission of his heirs needed via COM:OTRS.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:28, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:03, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is an old and low quality flag image from 2008. It is not used anymore. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Artanisen (talk • contribs) 2019-10-14T13:30:08‎ (UTC)


Deleted: new version is vastly better. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:07, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jean2005acosta (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos, painting, drawing, video. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:29, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: procedural close: images already deleted. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:08, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by AKirch-Bonn as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Urheberrechtsfrage Axel Kirch (talk) 08:00, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Multiple shadows strongly suggest these are indoors and therefore not exempt by FoP Germany. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:26, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by AKirch-Bonn as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Urheberrechtsfrage Axel Kirch (talk) 08:00, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Multiple shadows strongly suggest these are indoors and therefore not exempt by FoP Germany. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:27, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by AKirch-Bonn as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Urheberrechtsfrage Axel Kirch (talk) 08:01, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - I don't see anything here with a copyright. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:28, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:TOYS NicoScribe (talk) 08:01, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:28, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by AKirch-Bonn as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Urheberrechtsfrage Axel Kirch (talk) 08:01, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Multiple shadows strongly suggest these are indoors and therefore not exempt by FoP Germany. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:28, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This 15 July 2019 file is a duplicate of THIS file ("Parque Luis A. Wito Morales, Barrio Maragüez, Ponce, PR (DSC02593).jpg") which I uploaded 7 years earlier, on 29 September 2012, but missing the informative file ref number in parenthesis. Mercy11 (talk) 02:36, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination but larger file moved to older filename. --Green Giant (talk) 19:29, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by AKirch-Bonn as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Urheberrechtsfrage Axel Kirch (talk) 07:59, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Uploader request within 7 days of upload. --Green Giant (talk) 19:19, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Apparent copyright violation Leo CXXIV (talk) 11:03, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:17, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Luan as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: não há informações de licenciamento da imagem na fonte apresentada arquivo
Converted by me to regular DR to allow for discussion, as logo is on Commons since 2013. -- Túrelio (talk) 15:10, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, pois foi atribuída uma licença que não consta na fonte. --Luan (talk) 15:54, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:17, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sloppy re-creation of logo using similar font Trivialist (talk) 18:44, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:18, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

seems like a empty media file? Estopedist1 (talk) 19:26, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: works for me. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:18, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bessere Auflösung verfügbar: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Karl_Ernst_Albrecht_Wagner.jpg Mehlauge (talk) 20:11, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:19, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per close Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kilfree Junction, Co. Sligo (5994423216).jpg NLI photgraphs in ODEA collection all probably have copyright issues as photographer died 1992

Djm-leighpark (talk) 07:00, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep "probably" isn't good enough, unless this is just another of those "serious admin biznis" deletions that are only here as a make-work exercise, not for anything to do with the images.
Commons is full of work from living, and recently deceased, creators. We accept stuff here either because it's PD by age after death or because the creator has chosen to freely license it. These have come via the National Library of Ireland. A body of professional librarians, whose view I'm going to take over that of a couple of WP editors every time. No doubt the nominator has discussed this issue with the NLI WP:BEFORE (What did OTRS Ticket:2019093010006056 say?) , but otherwise this seems to be a large bulk deletion of content for no more reason than Commons' own poor filing. That's no good rationale. Andy Dingley (talk) 09:16, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


@Andy Dingley: Ticket:2019093010006056 was applied to the following email sent by myself to [email protected] & [email protected] and cc'ded to [email protected].

For attention of "National Library of Ireland on The Commons" "Flickr" team / O'Dea photographic collection.

Hi, Hi,

I have worked on Irish Railway articles and obviously have used images from Wikimedia Commons when available. Previously these were licensed on "National Library of Ireland on The Commons" in such a way as they could be used:

For example: NLI Ref: ODEA20/12

http://catalogue.nli.ie/Record/vtls000148330 which NLI placed onFlickr Commons about 2011/12 https://www.flickr.com/photos/nlireland/5994423216/ was copied to Wikpedia commonshttps://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kilfree_Junction,_Co._Sligo_(5994423216).jpg then used on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kilfree_Junction_railway_station in 2014.

However more recent items the NLI have published from the from the O'Dea collection cannot be used: For example NLI Ref.: ODEA 22/50 - I think uploaded about April 2019 to Flickr ... https://www.flickr.com/photos/nlireland/33917599278/ is not usable and I would love an image at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NCC_Class_W (Current interpretation of https://www.flickr.com/commons/usage/ of "No known copyright restrictions" leading to https://www.flickr.com/commons/usage/ and http://www.nli.ie/en/flickr-commons.aspx which seems incompatible with Wikipedia commons ).

My ideal would be if all O'dea collection pictures uplaoded to Flickr copy be confirmed as usable in Wikipedia. (In all events they should probably be all in or all out I'd like to certain of which).

Basically in terms of of the ODEA 22/50 I might have an option of purchasing an alternative H.C. Casserley image of same and obtaining the the copyright with a chance (at extremely hard work) of obtaining a copyright trail through the vendor and auctioneer. I have been badly burnt through not being able to get a provenance trail to Wikimedia Commons permissions satisfaction previously. Obviously I don't want to go through the pain of this route if I can simple use an O'Dea image from NLI.

Hope this makes sense,

Best regards,

My name redacted

https://www.flickr.com/photos/nlireland/48640728006/

Notes:
May be worth raising at Commons:Village pump/Copyright perhaps ? Djm-leighpark (talk) 11:32, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, Unfortunately I would only restate what I wrote at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kilfree Junction, Co. Sligo (5994423216).jpg, so please read it. This NLI problem has already been raised over 6 years ago with this research request and some other such images have also been deleted based on author's death date and PCP. Without confirmation from the NLI I think these have to go but can be restored in 2063. Djm-leighpark your mention of a Casserley image is an entirely different matter where the OTRS ticket, which I have access to, verifies the negatives were sold on behalf of the heir and included the copyright from the heir, so the purchaser now own the copyright. I'm fairly certain there are more NLI images whose author copyright is still extant. Ww2censor (talk) 21:53, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The librarian's name is Carol, we're buddies on flickr. I'm more than happy to ask for advice there. I've sent a PM on flickr, can we hold off for a few days until the Library responds? Oaktree b (talk) 22:37, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Oaktree b Any response? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Djm-leighpark (talk • contribs) 15:37, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Oaktree b: What's the word? No response? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:07, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
No response from the NLI. Oaktree b (talk) 20:50, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I'm having a wee gentle prod myself. I can't see myself in Dublin for a few months at least but the NLI is on my itinerary.Djm-leighpark (talk) 18:52, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment considering that most of these images have been here for several years, we should really wait until we get a response from the NLI on way or another. Perhaps one of our Dublin-based editors could visit them and see if they can solicit a definitive answer. Depending on the donation of the collection it's possible the copyright was transferred at that time. I am sure there are still several W.D. Hogan images, as mentioned above, still on the commons from these 128 found on the NLI Flickrstream that should certainly be deleted too, such as most of these. Ww2censor (talk) 11:33, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  CommentHere's what they replied today:

Re: Can you help with copyright on images?

Hello there, Brian! Sorry for delay on this, it came in just as I was dealing with the launch of a big exhibition! But I do thank you for bringing it to our attention. That said, I'm not convinced you'll be delighted with my response.

Brian, I don't feel qualified to make a decision on this matter. Copyright is a huge legal and other quagmire that has broken better women than me. Our take here has always been that we are willing to share on Flickr Commons our photos that are out of copyright, or for which we hold the copyright – solely for people to enjoy and for research, not for any commercial use, with the proviso that people link back to either Flickr, or reference the National Library of Ireland.

This is Flickr's take: BY ASSERTING "NO KNOWN COPYRIGHT RESTRICTIONS," PARTICIPATING INSTITUTIONS ARE SHARING THE BENEFIT OF THEIR RESEARCH WITHOUT PROVIDING AN EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED WARRANTY TO OTHERS WHO WOULD LIKE TO USE OR REPRODUCE THE PHOTOGRAPH.

And Flickr also says on RIGHTS STATEMENT... Participating institutions may have various reasons for determining that "no known copyright restrictions" exist, such as: The copyright is in the public domain because it has expired; The copyright was injected into the public domain for other reasons, such as failure to adhere to required formalities or conditions; The institution owns the copyright but is not interested in exercising control; or The institution has legal rights sufficient to authorize others to use the work without restrictions.

Our simplest option (and one that allows EVERYONE to have such an excellent and fruitful time on our Flickr Commons photo stream) has always been to use the No known copyright restrictions. That may not, and obviously from the whole string of queried images, apparently does not satisfy the Wikimedia admins involved. I personally have no problem with properly referenced O'Dea images being used on Wikimedia Commons, as they're always well-referenced, and link back to our Flickr.

Sorry, Brian, I know this is probably an unsatisfactory response, that will not really help you in this regard, but it is the best that I can give.

All the best Carol

-so, no real help. They allow us to use the ones out of copyright, and have no issues with us using the O'Dea ones still in copyright, but not for commercial use. This would seem to negate keeping the more recent ones on Commons. Oaktree b (talk) 03:06, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Accordingly, it is up to us to determine the copyright status based on our own best research because NLI cannot exactly confirm the copyright status and their "No known copyright restrictions" does not verify the images are freely licensed for them to be kept on the commons. Therefore we really can only go by the death date of the photographer when known. That's not what we wanted to hear but is pretty much what I had expected. We may have to go through the rest of the NLI media in the same way. Ww2censor (talk) 22:35, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately it would likely be necessary for the O'Dea heir to confirm the passing of the copyright in this circumstance in the rightful words. If the collection was bought by the NLI it would obviously rest on the terms of the agreement; if donated it is likely the intention was altruistically for unrestricted or CC-BY-SA use but it is perhaps equally likely no such thing was discussed.Djm-leighpark (talk) 15:58, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Djm-leighpark, Oaktree b: I wonder if the NLI knows who the heirs are and would they share that information. Otherwise someone may have to search for an obituary in the Irish newspaper of 1996. Does anyone have access to them online? The Gilbert Library in Pearse Street used to keep them but it was maybe 30 years ago since I was there and used their newspaper archive. Ww2censor (talk) 17:57, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
It is just possible the Irish Railway Record Society (or IRPS) might have the contacts. I'm not a member ... (I have chewed it over and it would give me additional sources) and I might go to a (London) meeting at some point but its likely Dublin where the answer will lie. I have no clue whatsoever as to the IRRS their view of Wikipedia! Or the man and the Cavan & Leitrim knows nearly everything. For some reason the I think the Mullingar area may be relevant, or not. In essence I have the simple hope of attaching the odd couple of images to Irish railway wikipedia articles where necessary. Amazingly the removal of the O'Dea might trigger some positive searching for images(unlikely), or there may be possibility of appealling to modellers or even general public who might have images their willing to upload. The person at the Eiretains site is another possibility. Djm-leighpark (talk) 20:34, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, previous DR, and discussion. Author died in 1992, so images are still under copyright. The source site does not provide evidence of a free license. Undelete in 2063. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:03, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Same reason as previous deletion discussion.

We may want to blacklist the Flickr account.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:14, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I wouldn't blacklist the entire NLI account, but the items from the O'Dea collection certainly don't seem to be public domain. Oaktree b (talk) 23:30, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Blacklisting the NLI seems like overkill considering many of their images are proven to be in the public domain and for others unfortunately neither we, nor the NLI, have exact details of their copyright status. As with many museum or library Flickr donated images, the onus is on us to determine that and change the licence of those images accordingly. "no known copyright restrictions" does not help us in this case. Others, like these ODEA images, have to be deleted for the time being until we can find better information or until 2063. There is a small chance I can visit the NLI in October but don't know until I get to Dublin. Ww2censor (talk) 10:32, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Luan as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: no arquivo da fonte apontada há o rodapé que diz: "2017 - PMDB - Partido do Movimento Democrático do Brasil - Todos os direitos reservados" GMGtalk 15:27, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this falls below TOO in Brazil, that's perfectly fine. I just want to know because I need to update my limited knowledge about Brazilian law. GMGtalk 23:27, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
You shouldn't look at me for that, I just try to interpret COM:TOO Brazil at best. (at worst I'm just waving my hands in the air) - Alexis Jazz ping plz 23:46, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: COM:TOO Brazil doesn't give any guidance for logos, but it says that it's generally more strict than in the US. COM:PCP, since we have no other information. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:07, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Luan as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Nesta imagem só há "formas geométricas simples" mesmo? Há a bandeira do Brasil, o texto estilizado "Brasil", gradiente de cores. Fora que envios que sobrescreveram a imagem inicial não apontaram suas fontes.
Converted by me to regular DR to allow for discussion, as logo is on Commons since 2010. -- Túrelio (talk) 15:27, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, pois não me parecem formas geométricas simples. --Luan (talk) 15:53, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:07, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Design includes probably non-trivial elements. Paul_012 (talk) 15:27, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: also out of scope/advertisement. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:08, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image was never properly sourced (links: Special:PermaLink/369844435, w:Special:Diff/5466457). The authorship is suspect (the leader of the rebellion is the painter?). The uploader has no other contributions, and no license was added. For all we know this is a modern painting. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:49, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per license in File:Beleg van Hulst in 1591, geschenk mr.dr.Overvoorde - Hulst - 20118534 - RCE.jpg. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:12, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

با پوزش، این تصویر برای یک دانشنامه مناسب نیست Thehalee (talk) 17:23, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader request. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:39, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]