Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 31, Number 1—January 2025
CME ACTIVITY - Synopsis

Rickettsia sibirica mongolitimonae Infections in Spain and Case Review of the Literature

On This Page
CME Introduction
Patients and Methods
Results
Discussion
CME Follow Up
Cite This Article
Figures
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Downloads
Article
Appendix
RIS [TXT - 2 KB]
Article Metrics
Metric Details
Related Articles
Fatal Crimean-Congo Hemorrhagic Fever, Portugal
Heartland Virus Infection, North Carolina, USA
Ehrlichia canis in Human and Tick, Italy, 2023
More articles on Ticks
Author affiliation: San Pedro University Hospital-Center for Biomedical Research of La Rioja, Logroño, Spain (S. Santibáñez, P. Santibáñez, C. Cervera-Acedo, V. Ibarra, J. Alba, A.M. Palomar, A. Portillo, J.A. Oteo); Dr. Balmis General University Hospital and Institute for Health and Biomedical Research, Alicante, Spain (J.M. Ramos-Rincón); Dr. Balmis General University Hospital, Alicante (I. Escribano); Lozano Blesa University Clinical Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain (I. Sanjoaquín, E.A. Bularca, A. Beltrán); Virgen Macarena University Hospital, Seville, Spain (E. Ramírez de Arellano); Getafe’s University Hospital and Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Enfermedades Infecciosas Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain (S. Guillén); Virgen del Rocio University Hospital, Seville (M.C. Lozano); University Hospital of the Southeast, Madrid (M. Llorente); 12 de Octubre University Hospital, Madrid (M. Puerta-Peña); University General Hospital Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Spain (A. González-Praetorius, L. Sánchez)

Cite This Article

Introduction

CME Logo

Medscape CME ACTIVITY

In support of improving patient care, this activity has been planned and implemented by Medscape, LLC and Emerging Infectious Diseases. Medscape, LLC is jointly accredited with commendation by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE), and the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC), to provide continuing education for the healthcare team.

Medscape, LLC designates this Journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1.00 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

Successful completion of this CME activity, which includes participation in the evaluation component, enables the participant to earn up to 1.0 MOC points in the American Board of Internal Medicine's (ABIM) Maintenance of Certification (MOC) program. Participants will earn MOC points equivalent to the amount of CME credits claimed for the activity. It is the CME activity provider's responsibility to submit participant completion information to ACCME for the purpose of granting ABIM MOC credit.

All other clinicians completing this activity will be issued a certificate of participation. To participate in this journal CME activity: (1) review the learning objectives and author disclosures; (2) study the education content; (3) take the post-test with a 75% minimum passing score and complete the evaluation at https://www.medscape.org/journal/eid; and (4) view/print certificate.

NOTE: It is Medscape's policy to avoid the use of Brand names in accredited activities. However, in an effort to be as clear as possible, trade names are used in this activity to distinguish between the mixtures and different tests. It is not meant to promote any particular product.

Release date: December 20, 2024; Expiration date: December 20, 2025
Learning Objectives

Upon completion of this activity, participants will be able to:

  • Analyze trends in infection with Rickettsia sibirica mongolitimonae

  • Assess demographic variables associated with R. sibirica mongolitimonae infections

  • Evaluate symptoms associated with R. sibirica mongolitimonae infections

  • Distinguish treatment outcomes of R. sibirica mongolitimonae infections

CME Editor

Susan Zunino, PhD, Technical Writer/Editor, Emerging Infectious Diseases. Disclosure: Susan Zunino, PhD, has no relevant financial relationships.

CME Author

Charles P. Vega, MD, Health Sciences Clinical Professor of Family Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine, Irvine, California. Disclosure: Charles P. Vega, MD, has the following relevant financial relationships: served as a consultant or advisor for Boehringer Ingelheim; GlaxoSmithKline.

Authors

Sonia Santibáñez, BSc, PhD; José Manuel Ramos-Rincón, MD, PhD, DTM&H; Paula Santibáñez, BSc, PhD; Cristina Cervera-Acedo, BPharm, PhD; Isabel Sanjoaquín, MD, PhD; Encarnación Ramírez de Arellano, MD, PhD; Sara Guillén, MD, PhD; María del Carmen Lozano, MD, PhD; Marta Llorente, MD; Mario Puerta-Peña, MD; Elena Aura Bularca, MD; Alejandro González-Praetorius, MD, PhD; Isabel Escribano, BPharm, PhD; Lorenzo Sánchez, MD; Valvanera Ibarra, MD, PhD; Jorge Alba, MD, PhD; Ana María Palomar, BSc, PhD; Antonio Beltrán, MD, PhD; Aránzazu Portillo, BSc, PhD; José Antonio Oteo, MD, PhD.

Top

Abstract

Rickettsia sibirica mongolitimonae is an emerging cause of tickborne rickettsiosis. Since the bacterium was first documented as a human pathogen in 1996, a total of 69 patients with this infection have been reported in the literature. Because of the rising rate of R. sibirica mongolitimonae infection cases, we evaluated the epidemiologic and clinical features of 29 patients who had R. sibirica mongolitimonae infections confirmed during 2007–2024 at the Center for Rickettsiosis and Arthropod-Borne Diseases, the reference laboratory of San Pedro University Hospital–Center for Biomedical Research of La Rioja, Logroño, Spain. We also reviewed all cases published in the literature during 1996–2024, evaluating features of 94 cases of R. sibirica mongolitimonae infection (89 in Europe, 4 in Africa, and 1 in Asia). Clinicians should consider R. sibirica mongolitimonae as a potential causative agent of rickettsiosis, and doxycycline should be administered promptly to avoid clinical complications.

The bacterium Rickettsia sibirica mongolitimonae (formerly R. mongolotimonae) has become an emerging cause of tickborne rickettsiosis since the 1990s. R. sibirica mongolitimonae was first documented as a human pathogen in France in 1996 in a woman who manifested a febrile rash and a single inoculation eschar on the groin; a rope-like lymphangitis also developed in the patient from the eschar to the draining lymph node (1). Four years later, R. sibirica mongolitimonae infection was diagnosed in a second patient, also in France. That patient manifested an inoculation eschar on the leg, fever, and lymphangitis that expanded from the eschar to an enlarged and painful lymph node in the groin (2). The first case reported outside of Europe occurred in South Africa in 2004; a man manifested an inoculation eschar on a toe, fever, headache, and lymphangitis expanding from the eschar to an enlarged inguinal lymph node (3). The first case series of infections, published in 2005, reported 7 new case-patients in France, 1 of whom was a traveler returning from southern Algeria (4). Clinical symptoms in those patients were fever, eschar, rash, and lymphangitis, and because of the lymphangitis symptom, it was named lymphangitis-associated rickettsiosis (4). Since 2005, most cases have been reported in the Mediterranean area, including France, Greece, Portugal, Spain, Turkey, and North Macedonia (5–10), and in other geographic areas, such as Africa and Asia (11,12). The clinical spectrum of infections has broadened; the bacterium has been shown to cause retinal vasculitis, septic shock, myopericarditis, and encephalitis (13–16). Since 2014, R. sibirica mongolitimonae has also been implicated as an etiologic agent of scalp eschar and neck lymphadenopathy after tick bite syndrome (17).

Few case series have been published worldwide (4,8,18); a total of 69 patients with R. sibirica mongolitimonae infections have been reported in case series or as isolated cases. Of those 69 patients, >30% (n = 22) were reported in Spain, the first of which was described at the Center for Rickettsiosis and Arthropod-Borne Diseases (CRETAV) in La Rioja, Spain (7). All of those cases were autochtonous. CRETAV, located at the Center for Biomedical Research of La Rioja, is a specialized laboratory and a center of excellence within the Network of Biologic Alert Laboratories that supports research on special pathogens, including those transmitted by ticks and other arthropods. CRETAV is also the reference laboratory for San Pedro University Hospital in La Rioja, receiving samples from other health services throughout the country. Thus, from June 2007 (when the first case was described) (7) through May 2024, R. sibirica mongolitimonae infections were confirmed at CRETAV in 29 of 365 patients who had tickborne rickettsioses. Diagnoses in the remaining 336 patients were Dermacentor-borne necrosis erythema lymphadenopathy (n = 187), boutonneuse fever (n = 130), African tick bite fever (n = 12, imported cases), and 5 other Rickettsia infections: R. helvetica (n = 2), R. massiliae (n = 2, 1 imported), R. monacensis (n = 1), R. aeschlimannii (n = 1), and R. parkeri (n = 1, imported case). Aware of the rising rate of patients with R. sibirica mongolitimonae infections diagnosed at CRETAV since 2020, and because only 4 cases from this 29-case series had been previously reported (7,14,15,19), we described the epidemiologic and clinical features of patients with confirmed R. sibirica mongolitimonae infections processed at CRETAV. We also reviewed all published cases because a comprehensive literature review was lacking. We obtained study approval from the regional ethics committee (Comité Ético de Investigación Clínica-Consejería de Sanidad de La Rioja; approval no. CEICLAR PI-37) and informed consent from all patients in this study. All procedures were in accordance with the ethical standards of the research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments.

Patients and Methods

Infections Diagnosed at CRETAV

Patients were asked about medical antecedents during their clinical interview, and variables, including epidemiologic data, were written down in their medical chart. In those cases in which relevant information was not recorded, patients were called later and asked for those data. For children, information was confirmed by their parents.

We defined a diagnosis of R. sibirica mongolitimonae infection on the basis of clinical suspicion (fever with or without rash, with or without eschar, and with or without lymphangitis) and positive PCR and sequencing results in patients with a history of tick bite or tick exposure. During June 2007–May 2024, cases were confirmed at CRETAV by using EDTA-blood samples, eschar biopsies, eschar swab samples, and tick samples from patients who were investigated at CRETAV because of clinical or epidemiologic suspicion of rickettsiosis. CRETAV diagnosed infections by using PCR of ompA and ompB genes corresponding to R. sibirica mongolitimonae. We subsequently reviewed clinical data of patients who had positive ompA and ompB PCR results for R. sibirica mongolitimonae.

Using molecular methods as described (20), we had previously extracted DNA from clinical samples from the Zoonosis Collection registered in the National Registry of Biobanks from Carlos III Health Institute (reference no. C.0006409), located at CRETAV–Centre of Biomedical Research of La Rioja. Whenever possible, we tested both acute phase and convalescent serum samples (collected 4–12 weeks apart), or only acute serum samples if the second sample was not available, by using immunofluorescence assays (IFA) to detect cross-reacting R. conorii IgG (CRETAV in-house assay or commercial assay [Vircell Microbiologists]).

Literature Review

We performed a systematic review of the literature by searching PubMed using the search terms “sibirica” or “mongolitimonae” or “mongolotimonae” and “Rickettsia” and a date range of January 1996–May 2024. We excluded nonhuman studies. We included human case reports and case series only if R. sibirica mongolitimonae infections were confirmed by either PCR and sequencing, except for 1 case, which was confirmed by indirect IFA and showed R. sibirica mongolitimonae IgG seroconversion.

Results

R. sibirica mongolitimonae Infection Cases Diagnosed at CRETAV

Tickborne rickettsiosis caused by R. sibirica mongolitimonae was confirmed in 29 (7.9%) of 365 patients during 2007–2024. The number of R. sibirica mongolitimonae infections compared with the total number of tickborne Rickettsia spp. infections increased from 12.5% to 41.7% during 2020–2023 (Figure 1). Twenty-three (79.3%) of 29 patients were men, 6 (20.7%) women. The mean age was 58 (range 5–82) years; the median age was 67 years. Three (10.3%) patients were <15 years of age. All patients sought medical care during March–September of each year: 1 in March, 3 in April, 5 in May, 7 in June, 4 in July, 2 in August, and 7 in September (Figure 2).

Only 6 (20.7%) patients remembered a tick bite, 1 had an attached tick, and 11 recalled tick exposure from hunting, gardening, living in a rural environment, or contact with dogs that had ticks. Patients resided in different regions in Spain: Aragón (n = 8), La Rioja (n = 8), Comunidad Valenciana (n = 4), Andalucía (n = 3), Madrid (n = 3), Vizcaya (n = 2) and Castilla-La Mancha (n = 1). The place of residence was within the same geographic region of the tick bite or exposure for all patients, even for those who did not recall activities associated with tick contact (n = 11) but denied recent travel outside of their residential region.

Symptoms at disease onset included fever (dysthermia, fever detected by thermometer) for all patients (Appendix Table 1). Inoculation eschars manifested in 27/29 (93.1%) patients as single (n = 20 [69.0%]) or multiple (n = 7 [24.1%]) eschars. They were located on lower limbs (n = 9 patients) (Figure 3), upper limbs (n = 7) (Figure 4), head (n = 3), hips (n = 3), buttocks (n = 3), groin (n = 2), abdomen (n = 2) (Figure 5, panel A), iliac fossa (n = 1) (Figure 5, panel B) and scrotum (n = 1) (19). A rope-like lymphangitis from the eschar to the draining lymph node was detected in 10/29 (34.5%) patients (Figure 3), and a generalized maculopapular rash was observed in 14/29 (48.3%) patients. One patient experienced septic shock and myopericarditis developed in another patient who had no remarkable medical history (14,15).

Hematologic and biochemical parameters were missing for several patients. When available, laboratory investigations showed leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, and raised lactate dehydrogenase, C-reactive protein, and liver enzymes (alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, and gamma glutamyl transaminase) as main findings.

We administered doxycycline (100 mg 2×/d for 10–14 days) to 26 patients, whereas 3 patients (2 children <15 years of age and 1 pregnant woman) received azithromycin (10 mg/kg 1×/d for 5 days for the children and 500 mg/kg 1×/d for 5 days for the adult). We observed improvement of signs and symptoms in all cases. We added supportive therapy with fluids and inotropic agents and intravenous meropenem (1 g every 8 hours) and vancomycin (1 g every 12 hours) for the patient who had septic shock.

For microbiologic tests, 1 clinical sample was available for 22/29 patients: EDTA-blood sample (n = 4), eschar biopsy (n = 5), and eschar swab sample (n = 12) (Appendix Table 1). For 1 patient, the only available clinical sample was the attached tick, which was identified as a Rhipicephalus pusillus. The remaining 7 patients had 2 different clinical samples available: eschar biopsy and eschar swab samples (n = 4), eschar swab and EDTA-blood samples (n = 2), and eschar biopsy and EDTA-blood sample (n = 1).

The ompA and ompB gene sequences obtained from 7 blood samples, 7 eschars, 18 eschar swab samples, and the R. pusillus tick showed the 100% similarity to those genes from R. sibirica mongolitimonae (GenBank accession no. MF379309 for ompA and JQ782657 for ompB). Acute- and convalescent-phase serum samples were obtained from 7 of 29 patients (Appendix Table 1). For 6 of those samples, we observed seroconversion (n = 5) or a 4-fold increase in titer (n = 1). We did not detect IgG against spotted fever group (SFG) Rickettsia in either serum sample for the remaining patient. For 6 patients, only acute serum samples were available; 2 of those showed IgG titers against Rickettsia and 4 did not react. No serum specimens were available for the remaining patients (Appendix Table 1).

In July 2023, ompA and ompB genes from R. sibirica mongolitimonae (100% identity) were amplified by PCR in 1 R. pusillus tick attached to a 70-year-old patient. Five days after removing the tick, he had a high fever (39°C); an eschar at the armpit appeared 1 day later. No lymphangitis, lymphadenopathies, or rash were observed. No EDTA-blood, eschar biopsy, or eschar swab samples were available from that patient. He was treated with doxycycline and recovered.

Published R. sibirica mongolitimonae Infection Cases, Including This Study

We found, reviewed, and extracted data from the full text of 26 selected papers from PubMed. Ninety-four cases of R. sibirica mongolitimonae infection were reported worldwide during January 1996–May 2024, including the 29 cases from this study; 89 of those cases were reported in Europe: Spain (n = 47), France (n = 36), Greece (n = 2), Portugal (n = 2), Turkey (n = 1), and Macedonia (n = 1) (Appendix Table 2). Only 4 cases have been published in Africa, including South Africa (unique case occurred in southern hemisphere), Algeria, Egypt and Cameroon, and 1 in Asia (Sri Lanka) (Appendix Table 2).

Of the total number of patients described, 67.0% were men and 31.9% women. The mean age was 49.8 (range 4–82) years; the median age was 55.5 years. Most (n = 77) infection cases occurred during April–July and in September of each year. Only ≈33% of patients remembered a tick bite. Four patients kept the ticks (1 tick/person), which were identified as female Hyalomma marginatum, H. anatolicum excavatum, Hyalomma sp., and R. pusillus ticks (5,9,10). The symptoms at disease onset (always after tick removal) included fever for all patients; ≈95% of patients manifested inoculation eschars, and 14 patients had multiple eschars. Eschars were located on lower limbs (n = 28), upper limbs (n = 18), trunk (n = 18), head (n = 15), hip (n = 4) and iliac fossa (n = 1), groin (n = 3), scrotum (n = 2), and buttocks (n = 3) (Figure 6). A rope-like lymphangitis from the eschar to the draining lymph node was noted in 33 (35.1%) of 94 published cases (Figure 3); a generalized maculopapular rash was observed in 66.7% of cases.

In published cases, R. sibirica mongolitimonae genes were amplified by PCR in 43 eschar biopsy specimens, 38 eschar swab samples, 12 blood samples, and 3 ticks (H. anatolicum excavatum, H. marginatum, and R. pusillus) removed from infected patients. Ten patients had >1 PCR-positive clinical sample: eschar biopsy and eschar swab sample (n = 5), eschar biopsy and blood sample (n = 2), eschar swab and blood samples (n = 2), and blood sample and a tick specimen (n = 1). Most (91.9%) patients were treated with doxycycline for 7–14 days, and all patients recovered without sequelae after antimicrobial drug treatment.

Discussion

We describe the epidemiologic and clinical characteristics of R. sibirica mongolitimonae infections in 29 patients who had their infection confirmed at CRETAV in Spain during 2007–2024, and we reviewed all available cases published in the literature during January 1996–May 2024. R. sibirica mongolitimonae has been considered a rare pathogen. Nevertheless, this bacterium has been the causative agent of >94 rickettsiosis cases since 1996, including the case series described in this study, mostly in the Mediterranean area. This infection typically manifests with high fever, myalgia and headache, single or multiple inoculation eschars with a nondefined inflammatory halo, nonpruritic maculopapular rash involving palms and soles, and enlarged draining lymph nodes. Lymphangitis is a typical sign of this infection and occurs in ≈40% of infected patients. Lymphangitis might occur in other rickettsioses, such as those caused by R. heilongjiangensis and R. africae, although in lesser proportions. Thus, in Europe, the presence of lymphangitis should suggest R. sibirica mongolitimonae infection (21). In this study, 10 (34.5%) of the 29 patients with R. sibirica mongolitimonae infections diagnosed at CRETAV had lymphangitis, a slightly higher percentage than that shown in a previous report from France in 2016 (18); a rope-like lymphangitis from the eschar to the draining lymph node was observed in 33/94 (35.1%) cases published worldwide. Fever was present in 100% of published cases; a generalized maculopapular rash was observed in 14 (48.3%) of 29 patients with infections confirmed at CRETAV, whereas 67.0% of patients described in published cases had the rash. Inoculation eschars were noted in 27 (93.1%) of 29 patients with infections confirmed at CRETAV and in 89 (94.7%) patients from published cases. Multiple inoculation eschars developed in 13 (13.8%) patients in published cases; a higher (24.1%) percentage was found in CRETAV cases. The presence of multiple inoculation eschars is common in patients with African tick bite fever (22).

R. sibirica mongolitimonae infection frequently causes a mild, nonlethal disease, but some complications have been described, such as septic shock, disseminated intravascular coagulation, neurologic disorders, acute renal failure, and myopericarditis (13–16,23). In 2020, a case of R. sibirica mongolitimonae infection with associated encephalitis was reported (16).

All outcomes, including for severe cases, were successful after antimicrobial drug administration. Doxycycline is the drug of choice for treating rickettsioses, even for children <8 years of age (24). Macrolides, such as azithromycin, are effective against rickettsial diseases and can be safely used during pregnancy. The early start of empirical treatment reduces severity and duration of symptoms (25). For published cases, oral doxycycline (100 mg/12 hours for 7–15 days) was administered to all patients, except 4 who received azithromycin (1 man, 1 pregnant woman, and 2 children 4 and 6 years of age). One patient received pristinamycin for 7 days.

In accordance with previously published reports, we found that R. sibirica mongolitimonae infections were seasonal and most cases occurred during the spring and summer (April–July) and in September. The infections affected men more frequently than women. In our case series, 23 (79.3%) patients were men and 6 (20.7%) were women, compared with 67.0% men and 31.9% women in published cases. The mean age was 58 years in the case series and 50 years in the published cases.

R. sibirica mongolitimonae infections are likely underdiagnosed or misdiagnosed as another rickettsiosis because diagnosis is mainly made according to serologic testing, which includes IFAs. Serology is limited by cross-reactions with other Rickettsia spp., mostly among SFG Ricketsia spp. because they share antigenic characteristics. Using molecular tools, such as PCR and quantitative PCR–based methods, on skin biopsy (eschar) and eschar swab samples appear to be the best methods to detect and identify R. sibirica mongolitimonae. For molecular diagnosis, eschar swab samples are preferred over skin biopsies because the sampling procedure is noninvasive and highly effective (26–28). Culture as a diagnostic method is fastidious and performed only in reference laboratories. Nevertheless, 6 eschar biopsies were positive for R. sibirica mongolitimonae by culture methods in published cases (1,2,4,6).

R. sibirica mongolitimonae was initially isolated from H. asiaticum ticks in Inner Mongolia (29) and from H. truncatum ticks in Niger (30). In Europe, R. sibirica mongolitimonae was detected in H. excavatum ticks in Greece and Cyprus, in H. marginatum ticks in Spain (31,32), in R. pusillus ticks in Portugal, Spain and France (6,31,33), and in R. bursa ticks in Spain (34). In Turkey, it was also detected in R. bursa, Haemaphysalis parva, H. excavatum, and H. marginatum ticks (35).

In 2005, the presence of R. sibirica mongolotimonae was reported both in a patient and in a H. anatolicum excavatum tick removed from that patient in Greece (5). In 2016, in Turkey, R. sibirica mongolitimonae infection was diagnosed by PCR in a man who had been bitten by a H. marginatum tick (9). A case of R. sibirica mongolitimonae infection after a Hyalomma sp. tick bite has been recently reported in North Macedonia (10). No ticks were associated with the remaining published cases, and many patients did not even remember receiving a tick bite. Nevertheless, because R. sibirica mongolitimonae has been detected in Rhipicephalus spp. ticks collected from areas close to where infected patients lived (6,33), Rhipicephalus ticks are also suspected vectors in Europe.

In published cases, only 18 (19.1%) of 94 patients remembered a tick bite. Four patients kept the ticks, which were identified as H. marginatum, H. anatolicum excavatum, Hyalomma sp., and R. pusillus; R. sibirica mongolitimonae was amplified in 3 of those ticks. R. sibirica mongolitimonae has been most frequently associated with Hyalomma ticks, the confirmed vectors in Africa. However, adult Hyalomma spp. ticks are large, but most patients did not remember a tick bite. This finding suggests that either the Hyalomma spp. vector is at an immature stage, which is rare because few bites occur from Hyalomma larvae and nymphs, or the vector could also be R. pusillus, which is a small tick found in rabbits. Data from case number 93 (Appendix Table 2), obtained from this case series, strengthens the potential role of R. pusillus ticks as R. sibirica mongolitimonae vectors. Under a One Health perspective, excessive reproduction of rabbits in urban/peri-urban areas of cities might cause human cases of R. sibirica mongolitimonae infection.

In Europe, R. sibirica mongolitimonae was confirmed as a human pathogen in 1996, and 94 cases have been reported during 1996–2024. During 1996–2012, only 25 cases were published, whereas during 2013–2024, the number of published cases reached 70. This upward trend of reports might be partly caused by the use of new tools to investigate tick-transmitted agents. In addition, warming weather and the overgrowth of certain wildlife species, among other factors, are involved in the increase in tick threats. Thus, the expansion of wild boar and rabbit populations might favor an increase in adult tick species responsible for R. sibirica mongolitimonae transmission. Hyalomma spp. ticks are characterized by their aggressive host-seeking behavior, unlike other tick species that use a passive ambush strategy as they wait in vegetation. Although Hyalomma ticks are not particularly anthropophilic, a progressive increase in their population has been reported in Spain and other areas in Europe, probably related to factors previously mentioned.

A strength of this study lies in the large number of clinical cases in Spain that were evaluated, accompanied by a literature review. However, it is possible that not all case data in Spain were collected because, despite the bibliographic search, R. sibirica mongolitimonae infections diagnosed in patients at other centers might not have been reported.

In conclusion, when rickettsiosis is clinically suspected, clinicians should be aware that empiric therapy should not wait for microbiologic confirmation. Doxycycline must be administered promptly, even in children, to avoid clinical complications. The rapid identification of Rickettsia spp. by using molecular techniques to analyze swab samples from inoculation eschars should be systematized. Because of the broad clinical spectrum of R. sibirica mongolitimonae infections, this emerging rickettsiosis is likely underdiagnosed or misdiagnosed as another SFG rickettsiosis. Clinicians should consider R. sibirica mongolitimonae as a potential causative agent in patients who have fever and an eschar or rash with or without lymphangitis and should consider the epidemiologic context.

Top

Acknowledgment

We thank Nerea González Romero for her contribution to this case series.

Top

References

  1. Raoult  D, Brouqui  P, Roux  V. A new spotted-fever-group rickettsiosis. Lancet. 1996;348:412. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Fournier  PE, Tissot-Dupont  H, Gallais  H, Raoult  DR. Rickettsia mongolotimonae: a rare pathogen in France. Emerg Infect Dis. 2000;6:290–2. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Pretorius  AM, Birtles  RJ. Rickettsia mongolotimonae infection in South Africa. Emerg Infect Dis. 2004;10:125–6. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Fournier  PE, Gouriet  F, Brouqui  P, Lucht  F, Raoult  D. Lymphangitis-associated rickettsiosis, a new rickettsiosis caused by Rickettsia sibirica mongolotimonae: seven new cases and review of the literature. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;40:1435–44. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Psaroulaki  A, Germanakis  A, Gikas  A, Scoulica  E, Tselentis  Y. Simultaneous detection of “Rickettsia mongolotimonae” in a patient and in a tick in Greece. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43:3558–9. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. de Sousa  R, Barata  C, Vitorino  L, Santos-Silva  M, Carrapato  C, Torgal  J, et al. Rickettsia sibirica isolation from a patient and detection in ticks, Portugal. Emerg Infect Dis. 2006;12:1103–8. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Aguirrebengoa  K, Portillo  A, Santibáñez  S, Marín  JJ, Montejo  M, Oteo  JA. Human Rickettsia sibirica mongolitimonae infection, Spain. Emerg Infect Dis. 2008;14:528–9. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Ramos  JM, Jado  I, Padilla  S, Masiá  M, Anda  P, Gutiérrez  F. Human infection with Rickettsia sibirica mongolitimonae, Spain, 2007-2011. Emerg Infect Dis. 2013;19:267–9. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Kuscu  F, Orkun  O, Ulu  A, Kurtaran  B, Komur  S, Inal  AS, et al. Rickettsia sibirica mongolitimonae Infection, Turkey, 2016. Emerg Infect Dis. 2017;23:1214–6. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Jakimovski  D, Mateska  S, Simin  V, Bogdan  I, Mijatović  D, Estrada-Peña  A, et al. Mediterranean spotted fever-like illness caused by Rickettsia sibirica mongolitimonae, North Macedonia, June 2022. Euro Surveill. 2022;27:2200735. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Cordier  C, Tattevin  P, Leyer  C, Cailleaux  M, Raoult  D, Angelakis  E. Rickettsia sibirica mongolitimonae infection, Sri Lanka. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2017;11:668–71. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Nouchi  A, Monsel  G, Jaspard  M, Jannic  A, Angelakis  E, Caumes  E. Rickettsia sibirica mongolitimonae infection in a woman travelling from Cameroon: a case report and review of the literature. J Travel Med. 2018;25:25. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Caron  J, Rolain  JM, Mura  F, Guillot  B, Raoult  D, Bessis  D. Rickettsia sibirica subsp. mongolitimonae infection and retinal vasculitis. Emerg Infect Dis. 2008;14:683–4. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Ibarra  V, Portillo  A, Palomar  AM, Sanz  MM, Metola  L, Blanco  JR, et al. Septic shock in a patient infected with Rickettsia sibirica mongolitimonae, Spain. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012;18:E283–5. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Revilla-Martí  P, Cecilio-Irazola  Á, Gayán-Ordás  J, Sanjoaquín-Conde  I, Linares-Vicente  JA, Oteo  JA. Acute myopericarditis associated with tickborne Rickettsia sibirica mongolitimonae. Emerg Infect Dis. 2017;23:2091–3. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Loarte  MDC, Melenotte  C, Cassir  N, Cammilleri  S, Dory-Lautrec  P, Raoult  D, et al. Rickettsia mongolitimonae encephalitis, southern France, 2018. Emerg Infect Dis. 2020;26:362–4. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Dubourg  G, Socolovschi  C, Del Giudice  P, Fournier  PE, Raoult  D. Scalp eschar and neck lymphadenopathy after tick bite: an emerging syndrome with multiple causes. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2014;33:1449–56. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Angelakis  E, Richet  H, Raoult  D. Rickettsia sibirica mongolitimonae Infection, France, 2010-2014. Emerg Infect Dis. 2016;22:880–2. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Salazar Alarcón  E, Guillén-Martín  S, Callejas-Caballero  I, Valero-Arenas  A. Clinical case report: Not all rickettsiosis are mediterranean spotted fever. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin (Engl Ed). 2022;40:44–5. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Santibáñez  S, Portillo  A, Ibarra  V, Santibáñez  P, Metola  L, García-García  C, et al. Epidemiological, clinical, and microbiological characteristics in a large series of patients affected by Dermacentor-borne-necrosis-erythema-lymphadenopathy from a unique centre from Spain. Pathogens. 2022;11:528. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Faccini-Martínez  ÁA, García-Álvarez  L, Hidalgo  M, Oteo  JA. Syndromic classification of rickettsioses: an approach for clinical practice. Int J Infect Dis. 2014;28:126–39. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Althaus  F, Greub  G, Raoult  D, Genton  B. African tick-bite fever: a new entity in the differential diagnosis of multiple eschars in travelers. Description of five cases imported from South Africa to Switzerland. Int J Infect Dis. 2010;14(Suppl 3):e274–6. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Gaillard  E, Socolovschi  C, Fourcade  C, Lavigne  JP, Raoult  D, Sotto  A. [A case of severe sepsis with disseminated intravascular coagulation during Rickettsia sibirica mongolitimonae infection] [in French]. Med Mal Infect. 2015;45:57–9. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Todd  SR, Dahlgren  FS, Traeger  MS, Beltrán-Aguilar  ED, Marianos  DW, Hamilton  C, et al. No visible dental staining in children treated with doxycycline for suspected Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever. J Pediatr. 2015;166:1246–51. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Brouqui  P, Bacellar  F, Baranton  G, Birtles  RJ, Bjoërsdorff  A, Blanco  JR, et al.; ESCMID Study Group on Coxiella, Anaplasma, Rickettsia and Bartonella; European Network for Surveillance of Tick-Borne Diseases. Guidelines for the diagnosis of tick-borne bacterial diseases in Europe. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2004;10:1108–32. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Solary  J, Socolovschi  C, Aubry  C, Brouqui  P, Raoult  D, Parola  P. Detection of Rickettsia sibirica mongolitimonae by using cutaneous swab samples and quantitative PCR. Emerg Infect Dis. 2014;20:716–8. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Wang  JM, Hudson  BJ, Watts  MR, Karagiannis  T, Fisher  NJ, Anderson  C, et al. Diagnosis of Queensland tick typhus and African tick bite fever by PCR of lesion swabs. Emerg Infect Dis. 2009;15:963–5. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Bechah  Y, Socolovschi  C, Raoult  D. Identification of rickettsial infections by using cutaneous swab specimens and PCR. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011;17:83–6. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Yu  X, Jin  Y, Fan  M, Xu  G, Liu  Q, Raoult  D. Genotypic and antigenic identification of two new strains of spotted fever group rickettsiae isolated from China. J Clin Microbiol. 1993;31:83–8. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Parola  P, Inokuma  H, Camicas  JL, Brouqui  P, Raoult  D. Detection and identification of spotted fever group Rickettsiae and Ehrlichiae in African ticks. Emerg Infect Dis. 2001;7:1014–7. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Fernández de Mera  IG, Ruiz-Fons  F, de la Fuente  G, Mangold  AJ, Gortázar  C, de la Fuente  J. Spotted fever group rickettsiae in questing ticks, central Spain. Emerg Infect Dis. 2013;19:1163–5. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Palomar  AM, Portillo  A, Mazuelas  D, Roncero  L, Arizaga  J, Crespo  A, et al. Molecular analysis of Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus and Rickettsia in Hyalomma marginatum ticks removed from patients (Spain) and birds (Spain and Morocco), 2009-2015. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2016;7:983–7. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Edouard  S, Parola  P, Socolovschi  C, Davoust  B, La Scola  B, Raoult  D. Clustered cases of Rickettsia sibirica mongolitimonae infection, France. Emerg Infect Dis. 2013;19:337–8. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Toledo  A, Olmeda  AS, Escudero  R, Jado  I, Valcárcel  F, Casado-Nistal  MA, et al. Tick-borne zoonotic bacteria in ticks collected from central Spain. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2009;81:67–74. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Keskin  A, Bursali  A, Keskin  A, Tekin  S. Molecular detection of spotted fever group rickettsiae in ticks removed from humans in Turkey. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2016;7:951–3. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar

Top

Figures

Top

Follow Up

Earning CME Credit

To obtain credit, you should first read the journal article. After reading the article, you should be able to answer the following, related, multiple-choice questions. To complete the questions (with a minimum 75% passing score) and earn continuing medical education (CME) credit, please go to https://www.medscape.org/journal/eid. Credit cannot be obtained for tests completed on paper, although you may use the worksheet below to keep a record of your answers.

You must be a registered user on http://www.medscape.org. If you are not registered on http://www.medscape.org, please click on the “Register” link on the right hand side of the website.

Only one answer is correct for each question. Once you successfully answer all post-test questions, you will be able to view and/or print your certificate. For questions regarding this activity, contact the accredited provider, [email protected]. For technical assistance, contact [email protected]. American Medical Association’s Physician’s Recognition Award (AMA PRA) credits are accepted in the US as evidence of participation in CME activities. For further information on this award, please go to https://www.ama-assn.org. The AMA has determined that physicians not licensed in the US who participate in this CME activity are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 Credits™. Through agreements that the AMA has made with agencies in some countries, AMA PRA credit may be acceptable as evidence of participation in CME activities. If you are not licensed in the US, please complete the questions online, print the AMA PRA CME credit certificate, and present it to your national medical association for review.

Article Title: 
Rickettsia sibirica mongolitimonae Infections in Spain and Case Review of the Literature
CME Questions

  • In the CRETAV sample in the current study, what approximate percentage of all tick-borne rickettsial infections were due to Rickettsia sibirica mongolitimonae between 2007 and 2024?

    • 9% in 2007 to 15% in 2024

    • 38% in 2007 to 37% in 2024

    • 12% in 2007 to 42% in 2024

    • 29% in 2007 to 17% in 2024

  • Which of the following demographic statements regarding the CRETAV sample with R. sibirica mongolitimonae is most accurate?

    • The cohort was equally divided among women and men

    • The mean age of patients was 24 years

    • Most cases occurred in March and April

    • Only one in 5 patients remembered a tick bite

  • What was the most common symptoms of R. sibirica mongolitimonae infection in the current study?

    • Eschar

    • Fever

    • Lymphangitis

    • Generalized maculopapular rash

  • What is the treatment of choice for R. sibirica mongolitimonae that was universally effective in the CRETAV cohort in the current study?

    • Azithromycin

    • Meropenem

    • Cephalexin

    • Doxycycline

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid3101.240151

Original Publication Date: December 20, 2024

Related Links

Table of Contents – Volume 31, Number 1—January 2025

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.

Top

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Aránzazu Portillo, San Pedro University Hospital-Center for Biomedical Research of La Rioja (HUSP-CIBIR), Infectious Diseases Department, Center of Rickettsiosis and Arthropod-Borne Diseases (CRETAV), Piqueras, 98 26006, Logroño, La Rioja, Spain

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.

Top

Page created: November 14, 2024
Page updated: December 20, 2024
Page reviewed: December 20, 2024
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external