Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 30, Number 12—December 2024
Dispatch

Feline Panleukopenia Virus in a Marsican Brown Bear and Crested Porcupine, Italy, 2022–2023

Author affiliation: University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy (G. Diakoudi, G. Lanave, C. Desario, V.I. Vasinioti, F. Pellegrini, V. Martella, N. Decaro); Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale di Abruzzo e Molise ‘Giuseppe Caporale,’ Teramo, Italy (S. Berjaoui, G. Di Teodoro, S.V.P. Defourny, S. Salucci, A. Cocco, A. Lorusso); University of Veterinary Medicine, Budapest, Hungary (V. Martella)

Cite This Article

Abstract

The virus species Protoparvovirus carnivoran 1 encompasses pathogens that infect both domestic and wild carnivores, including feline panleukopenia virus. We identified and characterized feline panleukopenia virus strains in a Marsican brown bear (Ursus arctos marsicanus) and a crested porcupine (Hystrix cristata) in Italy, extending the known host range of this virus.

Parvoviruses (genus Protoparvovirus, family Parvoviridae) are small, nonenveloped, single-stranded DNA viruses ≈4.5–5.5-kb long. Their linear DNA genome contains 2 major open reading frames encoding for 2 nonstructural proteins (1 and 2) and 2 capsid proteins (VP1 and VP2). Feline panleukopenia virus (FPV) and the closely related canine parvovirus (CPV or CPV-2), included in the species Protoparvovirus carnivoran 1, are highly contagious pathogens that cause acute and often fatal diseases in domestic and wild felids and canids (1).

FPV and CPV are closely related genetically and antigenically but differ in their host range and pathogenicity. The biological differences are determined by a few amino acid mutations in the VP2 capsid protein that modulate the ability to bind to cellular transferrin receptor type 1 (2). Parvoviruses have long been considered to be species specific; however, FPV and CPV-2 variants (i.e., 2a, 2b, and 2c) have been reported in a wide variety of wild carnivores. Of note, some species (e.g., cats, foxes, badgers, and giant pandas) may be infected by both FPV and CPV strains (3). We conducted a molecular investigation for Protoparvovirus carnivoran 1 viruses in wildlife in Italy.

The Study

During January 2022–May 2023, we collected tissue samples by convenience sampling from 89 animals: 44 wolves (Canis lupus), 26 red foxes (Vulpes vulpes), 15 European badgers (Meles meles), 2 stone martes (Martes foina), 1 Marsican brown bear (Ursus arctos marsicanus), and 1 crested porcupine (Hystrix cristata). All animals were found already dead in the regions of Abruzzo and Molise, Italy, and sample collection was conducted during routine necropsy procedures at Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale of Abruzzo and Molise ‘Giuseppe Caporale.’ All tissues were temporarily stored at −20°C before being transported by cold chain to the Infectious Diseases Unit of the Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.

We homogenized the tissues (10% wt/vol) in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium and extracted viral DNA from the supernatant of the homogenates of all samples by using the IndiSpin Pathogen Kit (Indical Bioscience GmbH, https://www.indical.com), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. We used quantitative PCR (qPCR) to screen DNA extracts for the presence of CPV/FPV DNA (4) and further characterized positive samples by qPCR based on minor groove binder able to differentiate CPV types 2a/2b and 2b/2c and CPV/FPV, as described previously (4).

Overall, 52 (58.4%) of 89 samples tested positive in the qPCR screening for CPV/FPV DNA (Table 1) with a geometric mean value of 8.91 × 103 copies of parvovirus DNA/10 μL of template (range 8.48 × 100 to 5.71 × 106 DNA copies/10 μL of template), including the samples from the Marsican brown bear and the crested porcupine. We characterized the bear and porcupine viruses as FPV by using the minor groove binder qPCR with viral loads of 8.40 × 105 (bear) and 4.43 ×105 (porcupine) DNA copies/10 μL of template.

To acquire the complete viral genome sequence of the FPV strains from the 2 animals, we designed 2 multiplex PCR protocols amplifying 15 PCR-tiling amplicons of 388–511 bp (Table 2), following an ARTIC-like strategy (5). We designed primer pairs based on the consensus sequence of Protoparvovirus carnivoran1 genomes recovered from GenBank. We performed PCR by using TaKaRa La Taq polymerase (Takara Bio Europe, https://www.takarabio.com). We used 500 ng of equimolar pooled PCR products for each FPV-positive sample as the input to the libraries prepared by using Ligation Sequencing Kit (SQK-LSK110; Oxford Nanopore Technologies, https://nanoporetech.com), according to the manufacturer’s guidelines. We sequenced the libraries independently by using flongle flowcell FLO-FLG001, R9.4.1, adapted in a MinION Mk1C platform (Oxford Nanopore Technologies) for 24 hours each. We subjected FastQ MinION files to quality control, trimming, and reference assembly by using Minimap2 plugin implemented in Geneious Prime software v.2021.2.2 (Biomatters Ltd., https://www.geneious.com).

Figure

Neighbor-joining capsid protein 2 (VP2)–based phylogenetic tree of Protoparvovirus carnivoran 1 from study of feline panleukopenia virus (FPV) in wild animals, Abruzzo and Molise, Italy, January 2022–May 2023. The tree was elaborated by using a 584-aa long alignment of the VP2 sequences of the FPV strains generated in the study and the cognate sequences of Protoparvovirus carnivoran 1 strains retrieved from GenBank. The tree was constructed by using MEGA X version 10.0.5 software (https://www.megasoftware.net) and the maximum-likelihood method, the Jones-Taylor-Thornton substitution model, and bootstrapping up to 1,000 replicates. Bootstrap values >70% are shown. Black bullets indicate FPV strains from a Marsican brown bear (ΙΤΑ/2023/bear/74 (GenBank accession no. OR602717) and a crested porcupine ITA/2023/hystrix/213 (accession no. OR602718). The black triangles indicate FPV strains from other wildlife animals in the same study: ITA/2023/badger/54552 (accession no. PQ246100), ΙΤΑ/2023/wolf/7197 (accession no. PQ246101), and ΙΤΑ/2023/wolf/54377 (accession no. PQ246102). MEV (accession no. KP008112) was used as an outgroup. Scale bar indicates number of amino acid substitutions per site. CPV, canine parovirus; MEV, mink enteritis virus; FPV, feline panleukopenia virus.

Figure. Neighbor-joining capsid protein 2 (VP2)–based phylogenetic tree of Protoparvovirus carnivoran 1from study of feline panleukopenia virus (FPV) in wild animals, Abruzzo and Molise, Italy, January 2022–May 2023. The...

We generated the complete coding regions of the genomes for FPV strains ITA/2023/bear/74 (submitted to GenBank under accession no. OR602717) and ITA/2023/hystrix/213 (submitted to GenBank under accession no. OR602718). Sequence alignment of the complete VP2 genomic region revealed 2 aa mutations, 103-Val to Ala in both capsid sequences and 232-Val to Ile in the porcupine capsid, which are 2 key residues defining the biological properties and host range of CPV and FPV (2). VP2 residues 103- and 232- are Val in reference FPV strains, and they are replaced by Ala and Ile in CPV-2 strains. Phylogenetic analysis of the complete amino acid sequence of the VP2 gene indicated that the 2 FPV strains ITA/2023/bear/74 and ITA/2023/hystrix/213 were segregated together but separately from other FPV and CPV strains. Of note, sequencing of the FPV strains detected in other species (wolf and badger) evidenced circulation of >3 different FPV subclades/strains in the sampled animals (Figure). Also, based on our results and the geographic areas where the samples were collected, we can hypothesize that there could be an epidemiologic connection via either direct/indirect contact between porcupines and bears or other cohabiting wild animal species.

Immunofluorescence analysis of the mesenteric lymph node tissues of the crested porcupine detected parvovirus antigens (Appendix Figure). However, immunofluorescence analysis conducted on the bear samples did not allow correct interpretation because of advanced postmortem degradation of the intestinal tissue.

Conclusions

Serologic studies performed for several bear species (members of the family Ursidae) have shown evidence of exposure to FPV/CPV (68). Two serologic studies involving Marsican brown bears reported seroprevalences as high as 40% (7) and 100% (8) for FPV/CPV, although those tests do not differentiate between CPV-2 and FPV. The possibility that FPV and CPV can infect bears has also been confirmed by detection and molecular characterization of FPV and CPV-2a from giant pandas in China (9,10). In both of those instances, the VP2-coding region presented unusual amino acid mutations (i.e., 299-Gly to Glu in the FPV virus and 370-Arg to Gln in the CPV-2a strain). Whether those unique amino acid variations affected the host range of the parvovirus strains remains unknown.

A case report from 1984 in Canada described a suspected parvovirus infection in porcupines that exhibited clinical signs suggestive of parvoviral infection (11). However, electron microscopy, serologic tests, and virologic investigations did not confirm the etiology.

Recently, several new parvoviruses (e.g., bocaparvoviruses and bufaviruses) have been discovered in domestic and wild animals (12). CPV and FPV seem to be endemic to wildlife populations and have shown continuous evolution over the years; CPV/FPV-like strains have emerged with a broadened host range (3,13). Domestic pets are regarded as a source of FPV and CPV strains for wildlife carnivores through spillover infections (3,14). However, wildlife hosts may also serve as virus reservoirs and sources of infection for the domestic animal population in a perpetual cycle involving 2-way transmission among susceptible hosts. In our study, prevalence of CPV and FPV virus in wildlife was higher than expected (3,15). Genome sequencing of FPV strains detected from nonconventional FPV/CPV hosts, the Marsican brown bear and the crested porcupine, revealed amino acid mutations in key residues controlling host range and receptor affinity. Our detection of FPV strains in a Marsican brown bear and in a crested porcupine in Italy extends the known host range of this virus.

Dr. Diakoudi is a researcher at the University of Bari, Bari, Italy. Her research interests cover virus discovery in animals, with particular focus on viruses with zoonotic potential.

Top

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by European Union funding within the MUR PNRR Extended Partnership initiative on Emerging Infectious Diseases (project no. PE00000007, INF-ACT) and by the National Laboratory for Infectious Animal Diseases, Antimicrobial Resistance, Veterinary Public Health and Food Chain Safety, RRF-2.3.1-21-2022-00001.

The authors declare no conflicts of interest in the study.

Top

References

  1. Cotmore  SF, Agbandje-McKenna  M, Canuti  M, Chiorini  JA, Eis-Hubinger  AM, Hughes  J, et al.; Ictv Report Consortium. ICTV virus taxonomy profile: Parvoviridae. J Gen Virol. 2019;100:3678. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Callaway  HM, Welsch  K, Weichert  W, Allison  AB, Hafenstein  SL, Huang  K, et al. Complex and dynamic interactions between parvovirus capsids, transferrin receptors, and antibodies control cell infection and host range. J Virol. 2018;92:e0046018. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Ndiana  LA, Lanave  G, Desario  C, Berjaoui  S, Alfano  F, Puglia  I, et al. Circulation of diverse protoparvoviruses in wild carnivores, Italy. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2021;68:2489502. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Decaro  N, Desario  C, Lucente  MS, Amorisco  F, Campolo  M, Elia  G, et al. Specific identification of feline panleukopenia virus and its rapid differentiation from canine parvoviruses using minor groove binder probes. J Virol Methods. 2008;147:6771. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Quick  J, Grubaugh  ND, Pullan  ST, Claro  IM, Smith  AD, Gangavarapu  K, et al. Multiplex PCR method for MinION and Illumina sequencing of Zika and other virus genomes directly from clinical samples. Nat Protoc. 2017;12:126176. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Dunbar  MR, Cunningham  MW, Roof  JC. Seroprevalence of selected disease agents from free-ranging black bears in Florida. J Wildl Dis. 1998;34:6129. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Marsilio  F, Tiscar  PG, Gentile  L, Roth  HU, Boscagli  G, Tempesta  M, et al. Serologic survey for selected viral pathogens in brown bears from Italy. J Wildl Dis. 1997;33:3047. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Di Francesco  CE, Gentile  L, Di Pirro  V, Ladiana  L, Tagliabue  S, Marsilio  F. Serologic evidence for selected infectious diseases in Marsican brown bears (Ursus arctos marsicanus) in Italy (2004-09). J Wildl Dis. 2015;51:20913. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Yi  S, Liu  S, Meng  X, Huang  P, Cao  Z, Jin  H, et al. Feline panleukopenia virus With G299E substitution in the VP2 protein first identified from a captive giant panda in China. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022;11:820144. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Guo  L, Yang  SL, Chen  SJ, Zhang  Z, Wang  C, Hou  R, et al. Identification of canine parvovirus with the Q370R point mutation in the VP2 gene from a giant panda (Ailuropoda melanoleuca). Virol J. 2013;10:163. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Frelier  PF, Leininger  RW, Armstrong  LD, Nation  PN, Povey  RC. Suspected parvovirus infection in porcupines. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1984;185:12914.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Jager  MC, Tomlinson  JE, Lopez-Astacio  RA, Parrish  CR, Van de Walle  GR. Small but mighty: old and new parvoviruses of veterinary significance. Virol J. 2021;18:210. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Hoelzer  K, Parrish  CR. The emergence of parvoviruses of carnivores. Vet Res. 2010;41:39. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Behdenna  A, Lembo  T, Calatayud  O, Cleaveland  S, Halliday  JEB, Packer  C, et al. Transmission ecology of canine parvovirus in a multi-host, multi-pathogen system. Proc Biol Sci. 1899;2019:286.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Miranda  C, Santos  N, Parrish  C, Thompson  G. Genetic characterization of canine parvovirus in sympatric free-ranging wild carnivores in Portugal. J Wildl Dis. 2017;53:82431. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar

Top

Figure
Tables

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid3012.240505

Original Publication Date: November 18, 2024

Table of Contents – Volume 30, Number 12—December 2024

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.

Top

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Nicola Decaro, Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Bari, Italy, S.p. per Casamassima Km 3, 70010, Valenzano, Bari, Italy

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.

Top

Page created: October 25, 2024
Page updated: November 26, 2024
Page reviewed: November 26, 2024
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external