Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 17, Number 2—February 2011
Letter

European Subtype Tick-borne Encephalitis Virus in Ixodes persulcatus Ticks

Cite This Article

To the Editor: The northernmost tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) focus is in Simo, Finnish Lapland. Four TBE cases were confirmed during 2008–2009. Tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEV) is transmitted by Ixodes spp. ticks and is endemic to Eurasia from central Europe to the Far East. The virus has 3 subtypes: European (TBEV-Eur), Siberian (TBEV-Sib), and Far Eastern (TBEV-FE). TBEV-Eur is mainly transmitted by I. ricinus ticks (sheep ticks) and the 2 other subtypes by I. persulcatus ticks (taiga ticks). The range of I. ricinus ticks covers most of continental Europe and the British Isles; I. persulcatus ticks are distributed throughout eastern Europe and Asia to the People’s Republic of China and Japan.

Figure

Thumbnail of A. Phylogenetic tree of partial E (1172-nt) gene sequences, shwoing Ixodes ricinus–transmitted strains (red) and I. persulcatus–transmitted strains (green). The tree was reconstructed by the Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo method in BEAST (http://beast.bio.ed.ac.uk). Maximum clade credibility tree with an arbitrary root is shown with mean branch lengths, and Bayesian posterior probabilities are given at nodes when >0.7. Country of origin and isolation year are indicated. Four s

Figure. A. Phylogenetic tree of partial E (1172-nt) gene sequences, shwoing Ixodes ricinus–transmitted strains (red) and I. persulcatus–transmitted strains (green). The tree was reconstructed by the Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo method...

The transmission cycle of at least TBEV-Eur in nature is fragile and depends on microclimatic conditions. Thus, within the I. ricinus distribution area, TBE is endemic merely focally (1,2). In Finland, TBE foci are located by the sea or large lakes (online Appendix Figure, www.cdc.gov/EID/content/17/2/323-appF.htm). Both vector tick species are found: I. ricinus ticks in the southern and central parts of the country, but I. persulcatus ticks are in scattered foci along the western coast, including the Kokkola archipelago and Närpiö municipality, where they carry TBEV-Sib (3,4) (Figure).

The first human TBE cases from Simo in Lapland (65°40′N, 24°54′E; Figure) were reported during 2008 (n = 2) and 2009 (n = 2). On the basis of interviews with the 2 patients from 2008, we collected 97 ticks and 17 bank voles from the 2 probable sites of infection during June 2009. From the rodents, we extracted blood from the heart and performed TBEV-antibody tests by immunofluorescence assay. The ticks were placed in 51 pools (1–3 ticks/pool). We isolated RNA from tick pools and rodent lungs and brains by TriPure Isolation Reagent (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN, USA) and performed real-time reverse transcription–PCR (5) to detect TBEV RNA. For the positive tick pools, we confirmed the identification species by Ixodes mtDNA sequencing (6).

Six of 51 tick pools (with a total of 97 I. persulcatus ticks) were positive for TBEV in real-time reverse transcription–PCR, resulting in 6% TBEV RNA prevalence. At least 1 organ was positive for TBEV RNA in as many as 15/17 bank voles, in line with our finding that TBEV RNA persists in rodents for months (7); 4 rodents had antibodies to TBEV. The TBEV RNA prevalence among ticks and rodents was relatively high, as is the incidence among humans (0.57 cases/year/1,000 inhabitants) in Simo, indicating a focus with high activity.

We isolated 6 TBEV strains from suckling mice (experimental animal permit ESLH-2008–06558/Ym-23): 2 from I. persulcatus tick pools (Simo-38 and Simo-48; pools of 2 and 3 ticks, respectively), and 4 from TBEV antibody– and RNA-positive rodent lung–brain suspensions (Simo-2, -5, -7 and -9). Partial envelope (E) and nonstructural protein 3 genes (4) of the isolated TBEV strains were sequenced (accession nos. HQ228014–HQ228024, GenBank) and subjected to phylogenetic analysis (Figure). Within the 1208 nt from the E gene, Simo-38 and Simo-48 from ticks and Simo-9 from a bank vole were identical. Other sequences differed for 1 nt and Simo-2 for 1 aa compared with the others. All strains were monophyletic and belonged to the TBEV-Eur subtype. The partial nonstructural protein 3 gene sequences were identical, and the phylogenetic tree showed similar topography as for the E gene (not shown).

The only tick species found in Simo was I. persulcatus, further widening its known distribution along the western coast of Finland (Figure). However, the virus subtype found in Simo was TBEV-Eur strain, the main vector of which is the I. ricinus tick.

TBEV-Eur strains are commonly very closely related to each other and do not form clear geographic clusters (4). Thus, it is difficult to deduce the origin of the virus. The nearest TBE-endemic focus is the Kokkola archipelago, ≈200 km south (Figure), but there I. persulcatus ticks carry the TBEV-Sib strain (3). The nearest areas to which the TBEV-Eur strain is endemic are in southern Finland where only I. ricinus ticks have been found.

Cattle serum samples were negative for antibodies to TBEV in the Simo area in the 1960s (8). The first human TBE cases from Simo were identified during 2008 and 2009. We isolated TBEV strains from ticks and rodents in 2009. Simo appears to be a recently established, and the northernmost, TBE focus known. TBEV may have been introduced to Simo from a geographically distinct location recently, likely within the past 50 years.

TBE seems to be moving northward in Europe (9) and shifting upward to higher elevations in the mountains (10), apparently influenced by climate change. An altered microclimate favoring TBE circulation (1), in addition to introduction of the virus, could also explain the recent emergence of TBE in Simo. In conclusion, Simo in Finnish Lapland is a new TBE-endemic focus demonstrating northward movement of foci and an unusual combination of the TBEV-Eur strain and I. persulcatus ticks in an area with no evidence of cocirculation of tick species or TBEV subtypes.

Top

Acknowledgments

We thank Agnė Alminaitė, Miska Merentie, Maria Razzauti Sanfeliu, and Liina Voutilainen for participating in tick and rodent collection, and Eili Huhtamo and Paula Kinnunen for excellent technical assistance.

Baxter Oy, Outokumpu Stainless Oy, and the Finnish Cultural Foundation are acknowledged for financial support.

Top

Anu E. JääskeläinenComments to Author , Elina Tonteri, Tarja Sironen, Laura Pakarinen, Antti Vaheri, and Olli Vapalahti
Author affiliations: Author affiliations: University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland (A.E. Jääskeläinen, E. Tonteri, T. Sironen, A. Vaheri, O. Vapalahti); National Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki (L. Pakarinen); Hospital District of Helsinki and Uusimaa, Helsinki (A. Vaheri, O. Vapalahti)

Top

References

  1. Randolph  SE, Green  RM, Peacey  MF, Rogers  DJ. Seasonal synchrony: the key to tick-borne encephalitis foci identified by satellite data. Parasitology. 2000;121:1523. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Lindquist  L, Vapalahti  O. Tick-borne encephalitis. Lancet. 2008;371:186171. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Jääskeläinen  AE, Tikkakoski  T, Uzcátegui  NY, Alekseev  AN, Vaheri  A, Vapalahti  O. Siberian subtype tickborne encephalitis virus, Finland. Emerg Infect Dis. 2006;12:156871.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Jääskeläinen  AE, Sironen  T, Murueva  GB, Subbotina  N, Alekseev  AN, Castrén  J, Tick-borne encephalitis virus in ticks in Finland, Russian Karelia, and Buryatia. J Gen Virol. 2010;91:270612. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Schwaiger  M, Cassinotti  P. Development of a quantitative real-time RT-PCR assay with internal control for the laboratory detection of tick borne encephalitis virus (TBEV) RNA. J Clin Virol. 2003;27:13645. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Caporale  DA, Rich  SM, Spielman  A, Telford  SR III, Kocher  TD. Discriminating between Ixodes ticks by means of mitochondrial DNA sequences. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 1995;4:3615. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Tonteri  E, Jääskeläinen  AE, Tikkakoski  T, Voutilainen  L, Niemimaa  J, Henttonen  H, Tick-borne encephalitis virus in wild rodents in winter, Finland, 2008–2009. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011;17:725. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Tuomi  J, Brummer-Korvenkontio  M. Antibodies against viruses of the tick-borne encephalitis group in cattle sera in Finland. Ann Med Exp Biol Fenn. 1965;43:14954.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Randolph  SE, Rogers  DJ. Fragile transmission cycles of tick-borne encephalitis virus may be disrupted by predicted climate change. Proc Biol Sci. 2000;267:17414. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Lukan  M, Bullova  E, Petko  B. Climate warming and tick-borne encephalitis, Slovakia. Emerg Infect Dis. 2010;16:5246. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar

Top

Figure

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid1702.101487

Related Links

Top

Table of Contents – Volume 17, Number 2—February 2011

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.

Top

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Anu E. Jääskeläinen, Department of Virology, Haartman Institute, PO Box 21 FI-00014, University of Helsinki, Helsinki 00014, Finland

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.

Top

Page created: July 13, 2011
Page updated: July 13, 2011
Page reviewed: July 13, 2011
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external