Wikidata:Interwiki conflicts/Archive/2014/02
|
This page is an archive. Please do not modify it. Use the current page, even to continue an old discussion. |
Items involved: Q1906059Talk, Q369531Talk | Status: resolved | ||
These two items are the same. --130.88.141.34 12:05, 1 February 2014 (UTC) |
Items involved: Q1033174Talk, Q2935229Talk | Status: resolved | ||
There was two articles on the French Wikipedia but we merge them. There is already only one article in the German Wikipedia. The tricky thing is : there is one location but two protection monument historique inscrit (Q10387575) one in 1979 and one other in 1996. What is the best way to deal with this case : or
Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 12:53, 2 February 2014 (UTC) |
Items involved: Q820606Talk, Q11714007Talk | Status: resolved | ||
Q820606 and Q11714007 are the same person and should be merged. --Rekrutacja (talk) 20:51, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
|
Items involved: Q4019262Talk | Status: resolved | ||
The item should be splitted in two: some languages refer to the order Platycopida (ceb, hu) and some other to the Cytherellidae family of it (ca, en, no, ssv, war) --Hkoala (talk) 18:43, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
|
Items involved: Q8046257Talk, Q15616311Talk | Status: resolved | ||
[1] should be linking to [2], not [3] nor [4]. Unfortunately, I cannot delete the link to the Farsi Wikipedia from Ya`fūr (Q8046257) in order to add it to Duldul (Q15616311). --Tamarod Çapuling (talk) 07:48, 7 February 2014 (UTC) |
- Done--GZWDer (talk) 18:38, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
Items involved: Q1153858Talk, Q6037736Talk | Status: resolved | ||
Q1 is used by many languages while Q2 is used by a few other languages. Both Q1 and Q2 are for the same thing however. I'm new to inter language linking so not confident to fix this myself.
- resolved.--GZWDer (talk) 18:48, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
Items involved: Q11493441Talk, Q841509Talk | Status: resolved | ||
In Japanese, 愛人 refer to sexual partners (especially "extramarital affair") and it is not equivalent to the Chinese "情侶", which means "couples" or "lover" (恋人 in Japanese and Significant others in English Wikipedia) In short, ja:愛人 should not be linked with zh:愛人 (since they have very different meaning.) while en:Significant_other should be liked with :ja:恋人 and :zh:愛人. So it would be separated into: Q841509 (As those are all about lover/couple)
Q**** (new entry, as those are not about lover/couple) In addition, there is no entries related to ja:愛人 so far. |
Items involved: Q2820737Talk, Q334328Talk | Status: resolved | ||
This is in fact the same article, but I cannot find a way to tell this to the "add language" system... Thanks in advance for your help! DavidBourguignon (talk) 17:44, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
|
Items involved: Q679639Talk, Q6755287Talk | Status: resolved | ||
Both referring to the same "Marburg virus". Not sure how the link to the English "Marburg virus disease" page got involved, but this seems to be the cause of the conflict. --Antheii (talk) 11:04, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
|
Items involved: Q3011594Talk, Q330548Talk | Status: resolved | ||
All the articles are about the same animal. The difference is that one item describes genus, and another describes species. — 89.179.33.125 12:31, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
|
Items involved: Q4993850Talk, Q15646875Talk | Status: resolved | ||
--ZdBdLaLaLa (talk) 15:50, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
|
Items involved: Q1153858Talk, Q6037736Talk | Status: resolved | ||
They are essentially both the same thing, the English article references Nandina (Q6037736), but should probably reference Nandina domestica (Q1153858). It should be possible to find the english article on dewiki. --Jonathan Haas (talk) 21:54, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
|
Items involved: Q11079985Talk, Q966669Talk | Status: resolved | ||
zh:文森特·梅西 is en:Vincent Massey in Chinese, but the Chinese page owns an individual item ID in Wikidata. Please delete the isolated one and link the Chinese page to others. --Nndd (talk) 02:53, 10 February 2014 (UTC) |
Items involved: Q5768250Talk, Q11925669Talk | Status: resolved | ||
It´s the same personage. Dorieo (talk) 18:24, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
|
International Pharmaceutical Federation (Q575080)/International Pharmaceutical Federation (Q14568372)
Items involved: Q575080Talk, Q14568372Talk | Status: resolved | ||
to merge.--Uziel302 (talk) 06:41, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
|
Items involved: Q577001Talk, Q12763754Talk | Status: resolved | ||
--Torceval (talk) 16:54, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
|
Items involved: Q266328Talk, Q2002016Talk | Status: resolved | ||
Hi, there should be an interlanguage link between the german "Verbindungstechnik" article and the english "fastener". But the wiki wont let me do this. i do not have the time to figure out why but it would be a great and necessary addition if someone could create that link please.--85.179.9.56 10:47, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
|
Q1451238/Q6273994/Q11216038
Items involved: Q1451238Talk, Q6273994Talk, Q11216038Talk | Status: resolved | ||
Wapedia or Mobile access?
|
Items involved: Q9842Talk, Q1949303Talk | Status: resolved | ||
Don't know what to do with those, seems similar, not totally identical, but not sure the articles are all ok ...
|
Items involved: Q5903147Talk, Q13399218Talk | Status: resolved | ||
I think these two items sbould be merged but there is a fawiki-link in each category. Aren't the fawiki-categories duplicates? If not, what is the difference? (I could also miss something.) Matěj Suchánek (talk) 09:50, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
|
Items involved: Q189672Talk, Q3076562Talk | Status: resolved | ||
(entry not signed)
|
Items involved: Q15074253Talk, Q217130Talk | Status: resolved | ||
Both of these are same subject: the economies of European countries more problematic. In this case, the solution is just unifying the interwiki because no duplicate pages.
|
Items involved: Q846849Talk, Q15271807Talk | Status: resolved | ||
these categories describe the same dish, they should be merged. One possible issue is that "Fondue" and "Hot Pot" were considered by some contributors to be the same thing. --141.70.82.221 11:01, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
|
Items involved: Q15715867Talk, Q12315086Talk | Status: resolved | ||
--Jpfagerback (talk) 23:06, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
|
Items involved: Q190600Talk, Q199580Talk | Status: resolved | ||
Someone should review these connections. --Matěj Suchánek (talk) 14:00, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
|
Items involved: Q194163Talk, Q15057100Talk, Q15720022Talk | Status: resolved | ||
It is possible that there is a conflict between these items. I am also not sure whether the second and the third could be merged. --Matěj Suchánek (talk) 14:34, 9 February 2014 (UTC) |
Items involved: Q8258698Talk, Q8880060Talk | Status: resolved | ||
I don't know why on de.wp there are two categories about basically the same subject. Should those categories be merged or not? If not, why? --Sannita - not just another it.wiki sysop 16:00, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
|
Items involved: Q8566932Talk, Q335680Talk | Status: resolved | ||
Can't get the two to merge--Evrik (talk) 05:49, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
|
Items involved: Q4664109Talk, Q5009984Talk | Status: resolved | ||
I am very new at this so please bear with me. Editors at viwiki would like en:Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion to link to vi:Wikipedia:Quy định xóa trang (or, ideally to vi:Wikipedia:Quy định xóa trang#X.C3.B3a nhanh). However, an attempt to do so results in an error that it is already in use by Q5009984 (i.e. en:Wikipedia:Deletion policy). The problem appears that be that deletion policy that is on several pages on EN are consolidated on a single page on VI. How should this be resolved? —RP88 (talk) 08:42, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
|
Items involved: Q3620710Talk, Q1611799Talk | Status: resolved | ||
The items are about the same town. They should be merged. --Aleturin (talk) 21:15, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
|
Items involved: Q4776345Talk, Q4401842Talk | Status: resolved | ||
Items involved: Q7038483Talk, Q4173475Talk | Status: resolved | ||
Items involved: Q7680840Talk, Q4223526Talk | Status: resolved | ||
Items involved: Q4152644Talk, Q350144Talk | Status: resolved | ||
Items involved: Q6166969Talk, Q6138226Talk | Status: resolved | ||
--Estevoaei (talk) 10:16, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
|
Items involved: Q1223805Talk, Q5860118Talk | Status: resolved | ||
They're the same town. Dorieo (talk) 17:49, 25 February 2014 (UTC) |
Items involved: Q5387285Talk, Q12965541Talk, Q15240817Talk | Status: resolved | ||
These three items are the same Mrs. June Keithley-Castro, Magalhães (talk) 13:20, 26 February 2014 (UTC) |
Items involved: Q2137428Talk, Q6735267Talk | Status: resolved | ||
These two items are the same Maico BuncioMagalhães (talk) 13:27, 26 February 2014 (UTC) |
Items involved: Q15673036Talk | Status: resolved | ||
On the German Wikipedia no inter wiki link is displayed to the English Article --NearEMPTiness (talk) 18:42, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
|
Items involved: Q854218Talk, Q6129838Talk | Status: resolved | ||
Items involved: Q2827099Talk, Q4694690Talk | Status: resolved | ||
Agostino Pipia (Q2827099) in frwiki, itwiki and ptwiki is the same person that Agustín Pipia(Q4694690) in enwiki --217.150.25.235 08:45, 28 February 2014 (UTC) |
Items involved: Q7314347Talk, Q2145303Talk | Status: resolved | ||
Perhaps the two items should be merged and one of them deleted. In English (enwiki): Reptile centre (Q7314347) / In Deutsch (dewiki): Reptilium (Q2145303) -- 46.20.163.142 12:04, 28 February 2014 (UTC) |
Items involved: Q10689393Talk, Q578109Talk | Status: resolved | ||
--(t) Josve05a (c) 14:06, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
|
Items involved: Q4205368Talk, Q15719906Talk | Status: resolved | ||
--Matěj Suchánek (talk) 14:14, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
|
Items involved: Q1033174Talk, Q2935229Talk | Status: resolved | ||
There was two articles on the French Wikipedia but we merge them. There is already only one article in the German Wikipedia. The tricky thing is : there is one location but two protection monument historique inscrit (Q10387575) one in 1979 and one other in 1996. What is the best way to deal with this case : or
Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 12:53, 2 February 2014 (UTC) |