Property talk:P10611
Documentation
states that an item has a certain certification
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P10611#Type Q16334295, Q5, Q43229, Q41176, Q7406919, SPARQL
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P10611#Scope, SPARQL
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P10611#Entity types
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P10611#citation needed
|
Duplicate of complies with (P5009)?
[edit]I noticed that the property proposal didn't mention complies with (P5009) at all, not even as a related property. Is this a duplicate and we should do a quick merge before it gets too much usage? Ping @Arbnos, ChristianK1, Jura1, Germartin1, Gymnicus, So9q: that all were involved in the original discussion. Ainali (talk) 14:20, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
product certification (P1389) is much more likely to overlap, but all three properties seem different to me. product certification (P1389) would not be used in person items. And complies with (P5009) would also be incorrect on many person item. Having a certificate that states something about having attained something is not necessarily the same as being compliant with something. Bill Gates is not compliant with Microsoft Certified Professional. He is certified as one. UWashPrincipalCataloger (talk) 17:36, 18 April 2022 (UTC)