A-weighting

Last updated July 08, 2024

Video illustrating A-weighting by analyzing a sine sweep (contains audio)

A-weighting is a form of frequency weighting and the most commonly used of a family of curves defined in the International standard IEC 61672:2003 and various national standards relating to the measurement of sound pressure level.^[1] A-weighting is applied to instrument-measured sound levels in an effort to account for the relative loudness perceived by the human ear, as the ear is less sensitive to low audio frequencies. It is employed by arithmetically adding a table of values, listed by octave or third-octave bands, to the measured sound pressure levels in dB. The resulting octave band measurements are usually added (logarithmic method) to provide a single A-weighted value describing the sound; the units are written as dB(A). Other weighting sets of values – B, C, D and now Z – are discussed below.

The curves were originally defined for use at different average sound levels, but A-weighting, though originally intended only for the measurement of low-level sounds (around 40 phon), is now commonly used for the measurement of environmental noise and industrial noise, as well as when assessing potential hearing damage and other noise health effects at all sound levels; indeed, the use of A-frequency-weighting is now mandated for all these measurements, because decades of field experience have shown a very good correlation with occupational deafness in the frequency range of human speech. It is also used when measuring low-level noise in audio equipment, especially in the United States.^{[ not verified in body ]} In Britain, Europe and many other parts of the world, broadcasters and audio engineers^{[ who? ]} more often use the ITU-R 468 noise weighting, which was developed in the 1960s based on research by the BBC and other organizations. This research showed that our ears respond differently to random noise, and the equal-loudness curves on which the A, B and C weightings were based are really only valid for pure single tones.^{[ not verified in body ]}

History

A-weighting began with work by Fletcher and Munson which resulted in their publication, in 1933, of a set of equal-loudness contours. Three years later these curves were used in the first American standard for sound level meters.^[2] This ANSI standard, later revised as ANSI S1.4-1981, incorporated B-weighting as well as the A-weighting curve, recognising the unsuitability of the latter for anything other than low-level measurements. But B-weighting has since fallen into disuse. Later work, first by Zwicker and then by Schomer, attempted to overcome the difficulty posed by different levels, and work by the BBC resulted in the CCIR-468 weighting, currently maintained as ITU-R 468 noise weighting, which gives more representative readings on noise as opposed to pure tones.^{[ citation needed ]}

Deficiencies

A-weighting is valid to represent the sensitivity of the human ear as a function of the frequency of pure tones. The A-weighting was based on the 40-phon Fletcher–Munson curves, which represented an early determination of the equal-loudness contour for human hearing. However, because decades of field experience have shown a very good correlation between the A scale and occupational deafness in the frequency range of human speech,^{[ citation needed ]} this scale is employed in many jurisdictions to evaluate the risks of occupational deafness and other auditory problems related to signals or speech intelligibility in noisy environments.

Because of perceived discrepancies between early and more recent determinations, the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) revised its standard curves as defined in ISO 226, in response to the recommendations of a study coordinated by the Research Institute of Electrical Communication, Tohoku University, Japan.^[3] The study produced new curves by combining the results of several studies, by researchers in Japan, Germany, Denmark, UK, and USA. (Japan was the greatest contributor with about 40% of the data.) This resulted in the acceptance of a new set of curves standardized as ISO 226:2003 (subsequently revised again in 2023 with changes to the ISO 226 equal loudness contours of less than 0.5 dB over the 20-90 phon range). The report comments on the large differences between the combined study results and the original Fletcher–Munson equal loudness contours, as well as the later Robinson-Dadson contours that formed the basis for the first version of ISO 226, published in 1987. Subsequent research has demonstrated that A-weighting is in closer agreement with the updated 60-phon contour incorporated into ISO 226:2003 than with the 40-phon Fletcher-Munson contour, which challenges the common misapprehension that A-weighting represents loudness only for quiet sounds.^[4]

Nevertheless, A-weighting would be a closer match to the equal loudness curves if it fell more steeply above 10 kHz, and it is conceivable that this compromise may have arisen because steep filters were more difficult to construct in the early days of electronics.^{[ citation needed ]} Nowadays, no such limitation need exist, as demonstrated by the ITU-R 468 curve. If A-weighting is used without further band-limiting it is possible to obtain different readings on different instruments when ultrasonic, or near ultrasonic noise is present. Accurate measurements therefore require a 20 kHz low-pass filter to be combined with the A-weighting curve in modern instruments. This is defined in IEC 61012 as AU weighting and while very desirable, is rarely fitted to commercial sound level meters.

B-, C-, D-, G- and Z-weightings

A-frequency-weighting is mandated by the international standard IEC 61672 to be fitted to all sound level meters and are approximations to the equal loudness contours given in ISO 226.^[5] The old B- and D-frequency-weightings have fallen into disuse, but many sound level meters provide for C frequency-weighting and its fitting is mandated — at least for testing purposes — to precision (Class one) sound level meters. D-frequency-weighting was specifically designed for use when measuring high-level aircraft noise in accordance with the IEC 537 measurement standard. The large peak in the D-weighting curve is not a feature of the equal-loudness contours, but reflects the fact that humans hear random noise differently from pure tones, an effect that is particularly pronounced around 6 kHz. This is because individual neurons from different regions of the cochlea in the inner ear respond to narrow bands of frequencies, but the higher frequency neurons integrate a wider band and hence signal a louder sound when presented with noise containing many frequencies than for a single pure tone of the same pressure level.^{[ citation needed ]}

Following changes to the ISO standard, D-frequency-weighting by itself should now only be used for non-bypass-type jet engines, which are found only on military aircraft and not on commercial aircraft. For this reason, today A-frequency-weighting is now mandated for light civilian aircraft measurements, while a more accurate loudness-corrected weighting EPNdB is required for certification of large transport aircraft.^[6] D-weighting is the basis for the measurement underlying EPNdB.

Z- or ZERO frequency-weighting was introduced in the International Standard IEC 61672 in 2003 and was intended to replace the "Flat" or "Linear" frequency weighting often fitted by manufacturers. This change was needed as each sound level meter manufacturer could choose their own low and high frequency cut-offs (–3 dB) points, resulting in different readings, especially when peak sound level was being measured^{[ citation needed ]}. It is a flat frequency response between 10 Hz and 20 kHz ±1.5 dB.^[7]^{[ failed verification ]} As well, the C-frequency-weighting, with –3 dB points at 31.5 Hz and 8 kHz did not have a sufficient bandpass to allow the sensibly correct measurement of true peak noise (Lpk).

G-weighting is used for measurements in the infrasound range from 8 Hz to about 40 Hz.^[8]

B- and D-frequency-weightings are no longer described in the body of the standard IEC 61672:2003, but their frequency responses can be found in the older IEC 60651, although that has been formally withdrawn by the International Electrotechnical Commission in favour of IEC 61672:2003. The frequency weighting tolerances in IEC 61672 have been tightened over those in the earlier standards IEC 179 and IEC 60651 and thus instruments complying with the earlier specifications should no longer be used for legally required measurements.

Environmental and other noise measurements

A-weighted decibels are abbreviated dB(A) or dBA. When acoustic (calibrated microphone) measurements are being referred to, then the units used will be dB SPL referenced to 20 micropascals = 0 dB SPL.^{[nb 1]}

The A-weighting curve has been widely adopted for environmental noise measurement, and is standard in many sound level meters. The A-weighting system is used in any measurement of environmental noise (examples of which include roadway noise, rail noise, aircraft noise). A-weighting is also in common use for assessing potential hearing damage caused by loud noise, including noise dose measurements at work. A noise level of more than 85 dB(A) each day increases the risk factor for hearing damage.

A-weighted sound power levels L_WA are increasingly found on sales literature for domestic appliances such as refrigerators, freezers and computer fans. The expected sound pressure level to be measured at a given distance as SPL with a sound level meter can with some simplifications be calculated from the sound power level. In Europe, the A-weighted noise level is used for instance for normalizing the noise of tires on cars.

Noise exposure for visitors of venues with loud music is usually also expressed in dB(A), although the presence of high levels of low frequency noise does not justify this.

Audio reproduction and broadcasting equipment

Although the A-weighting curve, in widespread use for noise measurement, is said to have been based on the 40-phon Fletcher-Munson curve, research in the 1960s demonstrated that determinations of equal-loudness made using pure tones are not directly relevant to our perception of noise.^[9] This is because the cochlea in our inner ear analyses sounds in terms of spectral content, each hair cell responding to a narrow band of frequencies known as a critical band.^{[ citation needed ]} The high-frequency bands are wider in absolute terms than the low-frequency bands, and therefore 'collect' proportionately more power from a noise source.^{[ citation needed ]} However, when more than one critical band is stimulated, the outputs of the various bands are summed by the brain to produce an impression of loudness. For these reasons equal-loudness curves derived using noise bands show an upwards tilt above 1 kHz and a downward tilt below 1 kHz when compared to the curves derived using pure tones.

This enhanced sensitivity to noise in the region of 6 kHz became particularly apparent in the late 1960s with the introduction of compact cassette recorders and Dolby-B noise reduction. A-weighted noise measurements were found to give misleading results because they did not give sufficient prominence to the 6 kHz region where the noise reduction was having greatest effect, and did not sufficiently attenuate noise around 10 kHz and above (a particular example is with the 19 kHz pilot tone on FM radio systems which, though usually inaudible, is not sufficiently attenuated by A-weighting, so that sometimes one piece of equipment would even measure worse than another and yet sound better, because of differing spectral content.

ITU-R 468 noise weighting was therefore developed to more accurately reflect the subjective loudness of all types of noise, as opposed to tones. This curve, which came out of work done by the BBC Research Department, and was standardised by the CCIR and later adopted by many other standards bodies (IEC, BSI) and, as of 2006^[update], is maintained by the ITU. It became widely used in Europe, especially in broadcasting, and was adopted by Dolby Laboratories who realised its superior validity for their purposes when measuring noise on film soundtracks and compact cassette systems. Its advantages over A-weighting are less accepted in the US, where the use of A-weighting still predominates.^{[ citation needed ]} It is used by broadcasters in Britain, Europe, and former countries of the British Empire such as Australia and South Africa.

Function realisation of some common weightings

The standard^[10] defines weightings ( $A(f),C(f)$ ) in dB units by tables with tolerance limits (to allow a variety of implementations). Additionally, the standard describes weighting functions $R_{X}(f)$ ^[10] to calculate the weightings. The weighting function $R_{X}(f)$ is applied to the amplitude spectrum (not the intensity spectrum) of the unweighted sound level. The offsets ensure the normalisation to 0 dB at 1000 Hz. Appropriate weighting functions are:^[11]

A

{\begin{aligned}R_{A}(f)&={12194^{2}f^{4} \over \left(f^{2}+20.6^{2}\right)\ {\sqrt {\left(f^{2}+107.7^{2}\right)\left(f^{2}+737.9^{2}\right)}}\ \left(f^{2}+12194^{2}\right)}\ ,\\[3pt]A(f)&=20\log _{10}\left(R_{A}(f)\right)-20\log _{10}\left(R_{A}(1000)\right)\\&\approx 20\log _{10}\left(R_{A}(f)\right)+2.00\end{aligned}}

^[10]

B

{\begin{aligned}R_{B}(f)&={12194^{2}f^{3} \over \left(f^{2}+20.6^{2}\right)\ {\sqrt {\left(f^{2}+158.5^{2}\right)}}\ \left(f^{2}+12194^{2}\right)}\ ,\\[3pt]B(f)&=20\log _{10}\left(R_{B}(f)\right)-20\log _{10}\left(R_{B}(1000)\right)\\&\approx 20\log _{10}\left(R_{B}(f)\right)+0.17\end{aligned}}

C

{\begin{aligned}R_{C}(f)&={12194^{2}f^{2} \over \left(f^{2}+20.6^{2}\right)\ \left(f^{2}+12194^{2}\right)}\ ,\\[3pt]C(f)&=20\log _{10}\left(R_{C}(f)\right)-20\log _{10}\left(R_{C}(1000)\right)\\[3pt]&\approx 20\log _{10}\left(R_{C}(f)\right)+0.06\end{aligned}}

^[10]

D

{\begin{aligned}h(f)&={\frac {\left(1037918.48-f^{2}\right)^{2}+1080768.16\,f^{2}}{\left(9837328-f^{2}\right)^{2}+11723776\,f^{2}}}\\[3pt]R_{D}(f)&={\frac {f}{6.8966888496476\cdot 10^{-5}}}{\sqrt {\frac {h(f)}{\left(f^{2}+79919.29\right)\left(f^{2}+1345600\right)}}}\\D(f)&=20\log _{10}\left(R_{D}(f)\right).\end{aligned}}

^[12]

Transfer function equivalent

The gain curves can be realised^[13] by the following s-domain transfer functions. They are not defined in this way though, being defined by tables of values with tolerances in the standards documents, thus allowing different realisations:^{[ citation needed ]}

A

H_{\text{A}}(s)\approx {k_{\text{A}}\cdot s^{4} \over (s+129.4)^{2}\quad (s+676.7)\quad (s+4636)\quad (s+76617)^{2}}

k_A ≈ 7.39705 × 10⁹

B

H_{\text{B}}(s)\approx {k_{\text{B}}\cdot s^{3} \over (s+129.4)^{2}\quad (s+995.9)\quad (s+76617)^{2}}

k_B ≈ 5.99185 × 10⁹

C

H_{\text{C}}(s)\approx {k_{\text{C}}\cdot s^{2} \over (s+129.4)^{2}\quad (s+76617)^{2}}

k_C ≈ 5.91797 × 10⁹

D

H_{\text{D}}(s)\approx {k_{\text{D}}\cdot s\cdot \left(s^{2}+6532s+4.0975\times 10^{7}\right) \over (s+1776.3)\quad (s+7288.5)\quad \left(s^{2}+21514s+3.8836\times 10^{8}\right)}

k_D ≈ 91104.32

The k-values are constants that are used to normalize the function to a gain of 1 (0 dB). The values listed above normalize the functions to 0 dB at 1 kHz, as they are typically used. (This normalization is shown in the image.)

Notes

↑ dBrn adjusted is not a synonym for dB(A), but for dBa. (In telecommunications dBa denotes "decibels adjusted", i.e. weighted absolute noise power, which has nothing to do with A-weighting.)

Related Research Articles

The decibel is a relative unit of measurement equal to one tenth of a bel (B). It expresses the ratio of two values of a power or root-power quantity on a logarithmic scale. Two signals whose levels differ by one decibel have a power ratio of 10^1/10 or root-power ratio of 10^1/20.

A weighting filter is used to emphasize or suppress some aspects of a phenomenon compared to others, for measurement or other purposes.

The total harmonic distortion is a measurement of the harmonic distortion present in a signal and is defined as the ratio of the sum of the powers of all harmonic components to the power of the fundamental frequency. Distortion factor, a closely related term, is sometimes used as a synonym.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mel scale</span> Conceptual scale

The mel scale is a perceptual scale of pitches judged by listeners to be equal in distance from one another. The reference point between this scale and normal frequency measurement is defined by assigning a perceptual pitch of 1000 mels to a 1000 Hz tone, 40 dB above the listener's threshold. Above about 500 Hz, increasingly large intervals are judged by listeners to produce equal pitch increments.

Noise pollution, or sound pollution, is the propagation of noise or sound with ranging impacts on the activity of human or animal life, most of which are harmful to a degree. The source of outdoor noise worldwide is mainly caused by machines, transport and propagation systems. Poor urban planning may give rise to noise disintegration or pollution, side-by-side industrial and residential buildings can result in noise pollution in the residential areas. Some of the main sources of noise in residential areas include loud music, transportation, lawn care maintenance, construction, electrical generators, wind turbines, explosions and people.

The sone is a unit of loudness, the subjective perception of sound pressure. The study of perceived loudness is included in the topic of psychoacoustics and employs methods of psychophysics. Doubling the perceived loudness doubles the sone value. Proposed by Stanley Smith Stevens in 1936, it is not an SI unit.

Audio system measurements are a means of quantifying system performance. These measurements are made for several purposes. Designers take measurements so that they can specify the performance of a piece of equipment. Maintenance engineers make them to ensure equipment is still working to specification, or to ensure that the cumulative defects of an audio path are within limits considered acceptable. Audio system measurements often accommodate psychoacoustic principles to measure the system in a way that relates to human hearing.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Loudness</span> Subjective perception of sound pressure

In acoustics, loudness is the subjective perception of sound pressure. More formally, it is defined as the "attribute of auditory sensation in terms of which sounds can be ordered on a scale extending from quiet to loud". The relation of physical attributes of sound to perceived loudness consists of physical, physiological and psychological components. The study of apparent loudness is included in the topic of psychoacoustics and employs methods of psychophysics.

Sound pressure or acoustic pressure is the local pressure deviation from the ambient atmospheric pressure, caused by a sound wave. In air, sound pressure can be measured using a microphone, and in water with a hydrophone. The SI unit of sound pressure is the pascal (Pa).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Equal-loudness contour</span> Frequency characteristics of hearing and perceived volume

An equal-loudness contour is a measure of sound pressure level, over the frequency spectrum, for which a listener perceives a constant loudness when presented with pure steady tones. The unit of measurement for loudness levels is the phon and is arrived at by reference to equal-loudness contours. By definition, two sine waves of differing frequencies are said to have equal-loudness level measured in phons if they are perceived as equally loud by the average young person without significant hearing impairment.

In audio engineering, electronics, physics, and many other fields, the color of noise or noise spectrum refers to the power spectrum of a noise signal. Different colors of noise have significantly different properties. For example, as audio signals they will sound different to human ears, and as images they will have a visibly different texture. Therefore, each application typically requires noise of a specific color. This sense of 'color' for noise signals is similar to the concept of timbre in music.

A weighting curve is a graph of a set of factors, that are used to 'weight' measured values of a variable according to their importance in relation to some outcome. An important example is frequency weighting in sound level measurement where a specific set of weighting curves known as A-, B-, C-, and D-weighting as defined in IEC 61672 are used. Unweighted measurements of sound pressure do not correspond to perceived loudness because the human ear is less sensitive at low and high frequencies, with the effect more pronounced at lower sound levels. The four curves are applied to the measured sound level, for example by the use of a weighting filter in a sound level meter, to arrive at readings of loudness in phons or in decibels (dB) above the threshold of hearing.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Audiogram</span> Graph showing audible frequencies

An audiogram is a graph that shows the audible threshold for standardized frequencies as measured by an audiometer. The Y axis represents intensity measured in decibels (dB) and the X axis represents frequency measured in hertz (Hz). The threshold of hearing is plotted relative to a standardised curve that represents 'normal' hearing, in dB(HL). They are not the same as equal-loudness contours, which are a set of curves representing equal loudness at different levels, as well as at the threshold of hearing, in absolute terms measured in dB SPL.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">ITU-R 468 noise weighting</span> Noise measurement standard

ITU-R 468 is a standard relating to noise measurement, widely used when measuring noise in audio systems. The standard, now referred to as ITU-R BS.468-4, defines a weighting filter curve, together with a quasi-peak rectifier having special characteristics as defined by specified tone-burst tests. It is currently maintained by the International Telecommunication Union who took it over from the CCIR.

The process of frequency weighting involves emphasizing the contribution of particular aspects of a phenomenon over others to an outcome or result; thereby highlighting those aspects in comparison to others in the analysis. That is, rather than each variable in the data set contributing equally to the final result, some of the data is adjusted to make a greater contribution than others. This is analogous to the practice of adding (extra) weight to one side of a pair of scales in order to favour either the buyer or seller.

A sound level meter is used for acoustic measurements. It is commonly a hand-held instrument with a microphone. The best type of microphone for sound level meters is the condenser microphone, which combines precision with stability and reliability. The diaphragm of the microphone responds to changes in air pressure caused by sound waves. That is why the instrument is sometimes referred to as a sound pressure level meter (SPL). This movement of the diaphragm, i.e. the sound pressure, is converted into an electrical signal. While describing sound in terms of sound pressure, a logarithmic conversion is usually applied and the sound pressure level is stated instead, in decibels (dB), with 0 dB SPL equal to 20 micropascals.

Measurement of wow and flutter is carried out on audio tape machines, cassette recorders and players, and other analog recording and reproduction devices with rotary components This measurement quantifies the amount of 'frequency wobble' present in subjectively valid terms. Turntables tend to suffer mainly slow wow. In digital systems, which are locked to crystal oscillators, variations in clock timing are referred to as wander or jitter, depending on speed.

Audio noise measurement is a process carried out to assess the quality of audio equipment, such as the kind used in recording studios, broadcast engineering, and in-home high fidelity.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sound</span> Vibration that travels via pressure waves in matter

In physics, sound is a vibration that propagates as an acoustic wave through a transmission medium such as a gas, liquid or solid. In human physiology and psychology, sound is the reception of such waves and their perception by the brain. Only acoustic waves that have frequencies lying between about 20 Hz and 20 kHz, the audio frequency range, elicit an auditory percept in humans. In air at atmospheric pressure, these represent sound waves with wavelengths of 17 meters (56 ft) to 1.7 centimeters (0.67 in). Sound waves above 20 kHz are known as ultrasound and are not audible to humans. Sound waves below 20 Hz are known as infrasound. Different animal species have varying hearing ranges.

Effective perceived noise in decibels (EPNdB) or Effective Perceived Noise Level (EPNL) is a measure of the relative noisiness of an individual aircraft pass-by event. It is used for aircraft noise certification and applies to an individual aircraft, not the noise exposure from an airport. Separate ratings are stated for takeoff, overflight and landing events, and represent the integrated power sum of noisiness during the event. Instantaneous value of noisiness is computed with the PNL or PNdB metric over the period within which the noise from the aircraft is within 10 dB of the maximum noise It is defined, with computational instructions, in Annex 16 of the Convention on International Civil Aviation and in Part 36 of the US Federal Aviation Regulations. The scaling is such that the EPNdB rating represents the integrated noisiness over a ten-second period; EPNdB of 100 dB means that the event has the same integrated noisiness as a 100 PNdB sound lasting ten seconds. Direct comparison with A-weighted sound pressure level, which is used for many other environmental sound measurements, is not possible because PNdB is a noisiness metric rather than a sound pressure metric.

References

↑ Meyer-Bisch, Christian (2005). "[Measuring noise]". Médecine/Sciences. 21 (5): 546–550. doi: 10.1051/medsci/2005215546 . ISSN 0767-0974. PMID 15885208.
↑ Pierre, Jr., Richard L. St.; Maguire, Daniel J. (July 2004). "The Impact of A-weighting Sound Pressure Level Measurements during the Evaluation of Noise Exposure" (PDF). Retrieved 2011-09-13.
↑ "Precise and full-range determination of two-dimensional equal loudness contours" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2007-09-27.
↑ "Loudness experiment on general environmental noises considering low-frequency components down to infrasound". Archived from the original on 2023-03-29.
↑ Rimell, Andrew; Mansfield, Neil; Paddan, Gurmail (2015). "Design of digital filters for frequency weightings (A and C) required for risk assessments of workers exposed to noise". Industrial Health. 53 (53): 21–27. doi:10.2486/indhealth.2013-0003. PMC 4331191 . PMID 25224333. S2CID 13997453.
↑ "BIP_2_2_jb ZIP file" (PDF).
↑ Lauer, Amanda; El-Sharkawy, AbdEl-Monem M.; Kraitchman, Dara; Edelstein, William (2012). "MRI Acoustic Noise Can Harm Experimental and Companion Animals". Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 36 (3): 743–747. doi: 10.1002/jmri.23653 . PMID 22488793. S2CID 7436249.
↑ Ratzel, U.; Bayer, O.; Brachat, P.; Hoffmann, M.; Jänke, K.; Kiesel, K.-J.; Mehnert, C.; Scheck, C.; Westerhausen, C.; Krapf, K.-G.; Herrmann, L.; Blaul, J., eds. (February 2020) [2016-02-26]. "Tieffrequente Geräusche inkl. Infraschall von Windkraftanlagen und anderen Quellen - Bericht über Ergebnisse des Messprojekts 2013-2015" (in German) (3 ed.). Karlsruhe, Germany: Landesanstalt für Umwelt, Messungen und Naturschutz Baden-Württemberg (LUBW), Referat 34 – Technischer Arbeitsschutz, Lärmschutz. pp. 10–11, 13, 17, 22–24, 27–28, 32–33, 38–39, 43–44, 49, 90. Retrieved 2021-06-07. p. 90: Für den Bereich des Infraschalls gibt es eine eigene Frequenzbewertung, die so genannte G-Bewertung. Entsprechend bewertete Pegel werden als dB(G) – „Dezibel G" – angegeben. Bekannter ist die A-Bewertung von Geräuschen als dB(A) – „Dezibel A" –, die dem Hörempfinden des Menschen nachempfunden ist. Die G-Bewertung hat ihren Schwerpunkt bei 20 Hz. Zwischen 10 Hz und 25 Hz werden Pegel verstärkt, darunter und darüber fällt die Bewertungskurve rasch ab. Zweck der G-Bewertung ist es, eine Situation im Hinblick auf tiefe Frequenzen bzw. Infraschall mit einer einzigen Zahl zu charakterisieren. Ein Nachteil ist, dass Frequenzen unterhalb 8 Hz und oberhalb 40 Hz kaum mehr einen Beitrag leisten. (104 pages)
↑ Bauer, B.; Torick, E. (1966). "Researches in loudness measurement". IEEE Transactions on Audio and Electroacoustics. 14 (3): 141–151. doi:10.1109/TAU.1966.1161864.
1 2 3 4 IEC 61672-1:2013 Electroacoustics - Sound level meters - Part 1: Specifications. IEC. 2013.
↑ "Frequency weighting equations". Cross Spectrum. 2004. Archived from the original on 2011-06-17.
↑ Aarts, Ronald M. (1992-03-01). "A Comparison of Some Loudness Measures for Loudspeaker Listening Tests" . Audio Engineering Society . 40 (3): 142–146. Archived from the original on 2022-10-27. Retrieved 2022-10-27.
↑ "Noise Measurement Briefing". Product Technology Partners Ltd. Archived from the original on 2008-06-30.

External links

Noise Measurement Briefing. Archived from the original on 2013-02-25.
A-weighting filter circuit for audio measurements Archived 2016-12-31 at the Wayback Machine
Weighting Filter Set Circuit diagrams
AES pro audio reference definition of "weighting filters"
Frequency Weighting Equations
A-weighting in detail
A-Weighting Equation and online calculation
Researches in loudness measurement by CBS using noise bands, 1966 IEEE Article
Comparison of some loudness measures for loudspeaker listening tests (Aarts, JAES, 1992) PDF containing algorithm for ABCD filters

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.

[NB_dBa-9] dBrn adjusted is not a synonym for dB(A), but for dBa. (In telecommunications dBa denotes "decibels adjusted", i.e. weighted absolute noise power, which has nothing to do with A-weighting.)

[Meyer-Bisch-1] Meyer-Bisch, Christian (2005). "[Measuring noise]". Médecine/Sciences. 21 (5): 546–550. doi: 10.1051/medsci/2005215546 . ISSN 0767-0974. PMID 15885208.

[Pierre_2004-2] Pierre, Jr., Richard L. St.; Maguire, Daniel J. (July 2004). "The Impact of A-weighting Sound Pressure Level Measurements during the Evaluation of Noise Exposure" (PDF). Retrieved 2011-09-13.

[NEDO_2003-3] "Precise and full-range determination of two-dimensional equal loudness contours" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2007-09-27.

[Yokoyama_2015-4] "Loudness experiment on general environmental noises considering low-frequency components down to infrasound". Archived from the original on 2023-03-29.

[Rimell-Mansfield-Paddan_2015-5] Rimell, Andrew; Mansfield, Neil; Paddan, Gurmail (2015). "Design of digital filters for frequency weightings (A and C) required for risk assessments of workers exposed to noise". Industrial Health. 53 (53): 21–27. doi:10.2486/indhealth.2013-0003. PMC 4331191 . PMID 25224333. S2CID 13997453.

[ICAO-6] "BIP_2_2_jb ZIP file" (PDF).

[Lauer_2012-7] Lauer, Amanda; El-Sharkawy, AbdEl-Monem M.; Kraitchman, Dara; Edelstein, William (2012). "MRI Acoustic Noise Can Harm Experimental and Companion Animals". Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 36 (3): 743–747. doi: 10.1002/jmri.23653 . PMID 22488793. S2CID 7436249.

[LUBW_2016-8] Ratzel, U.; Bayer, O.; Brachat, P.; Hoffmann, M.; Jänke, K.; Kiesel, K.-J.; Mehnert, C.; Scheck, C.; Westerhausen, C.; Krapf, K.-G.; Herrmann, L.; Blaul, J., eds. (February 2020) [2016-02-26]. "Tieffrequente Geräusche inkl. Infraschall von Windkraftanlagen und anderen Quellen - Bericht über Ergebnisse des Messprojekts 2013-2015" (in German) (3 ed.). Karlsruhe, Germany: Landesanstalt für Umwelt, Messungen und Naturschutz Baden-Württemberg (LUBW), Referat 34 – Technischer Arbeitsschutz, Lärmschutz. pp. 10–11, 13, 17, 22–24, 27–28, 32–33, 38–39, 43–44, 49, 90. Retrieved 2021-06-07. p. 90: Für den Bereich des Infraschalls gibt es eine eigene Frequenzbewertung, die so genannte G-Bewertung. Entsprechend bewertete Pegel werden als dB(G) – „Dezibel G" – angegeben. Bekannter ist die A-Bewertung von Geräuschen als dB(A) – „Dezibel A" –, die dem Hörempfinden des Menschen nachempfunden ist. Die G-Bewertung hat ihren Schwerpunkt bei 20 Hz. Zwischen 10 Hz und 25 Hz werden Pegel verstärkt, darunter und darüber fällt die Bewertungskurve rasch ab. Zweck der G-Bewertung ist es, eine Situation im Hinblick auf tiefe Frequenzen bzw. Infraschall mit einer einzigen Zahl zu charakterisieren. Ein Nachteil ist, dass Frequenzen unterhalb 8 Hz und oberhalb 40 Hz kaum mehr einen Beitrag leisten. (104 pages)

[Bauer-Torick_1966-10] Bauer, B.; Torick, E. (1966). "Researches in loudness measurement". IEEE Transactions on Audio and Electroacoustics. 14 (3): 141–151. doi:10.1109/TAU.1966.1161864.

[IEC61672-11] 1 2 3 4 IEC 61672-1:2013 Electroacoustics - Sound level meters - Part 1: Specifications. IEC. 2013.

[CS_2004-12] "Frequency weighting equations". Cross Spectrum. 2004. Archived from the original on 2011-06-17.

[Aarts_1992-13] Aarts, Ronald M. (1992-03-01). "A Comparison of Some Loudness Measures for Loudspeaker Listening Tests" . Audio Engineering Society . 40 (3): 142–146. Archived from the original on 2022-10-27. Retrieved 2022-10-27.

[PTP-14] "Noise Measurement Briefing". Product Technology Partners Ltd. Archived from the original on 2008-06-30.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]

[nb 1]

[9]

[10]

[11]

[12]

[13]