About this board

Previous discussion was archived at User talk:Sic19/Archive 1 on 2019-03-07.

Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #171 is out: Dagbani Wikipedia will be our first wiki for Wikifunctions integration

1
MediaWiki message delivery (talkcontribs)

There is a new update for Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia. Please, come and read it!

In this issue, we introduce Dagbani Wikipedia as our first wiki for Wikifunctions integration, discuss the recent stability challenges we've had in the past few days, and we take a look at the latest software developments.

Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check our archive!

Enjoy the reading! -- User:Sannita (WMF) (talk) 13:51, 13 September 2024 (UTC)

Reply to "Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #171 is out: Dagbani Wikipedia will be our first wiki for Wikifunctions integration"
MediaWiki message delivery (talkcontribs)
Reply to "Wikidata weekly summary #644"

Finished "mismatched names with papers" file

1
ArthurPSmith (talkcontribs)

Hi Simon - I finally finished going through your file Wikidata-ORCID mismatched names with papers 20240426.csv - only a little over 4 months of work :) I think I caught everything. Most common issue were cases where whoever added the author record mixed up two different authors on a paper - often first author and last author, or two neighboring authors. This may be because the publisher or Crossref or other secondary DB attached an ORCID to the wrong author. Anyway there were a lot of other special cases too. Sometimes the ORCID name was just a variant of the author name, and things were correct as they were (I added the variant name as an alias) - for example for females who had a name change. I also ran across quite a lot where the ORCID name bore no resemblance to any name on the (any) paper with that author, no idea what happened there.

I'm hoping these were all temporary glitches in data imports - I don't think I ran across any bad ORCIDs from 2021 or later.

Anyway, after going through this I thought there were a few improvements you could make to this dataset, if you run it again:

  • Your file was missing papers with no DOI - I think it would be fine to leave the paper author name blank in these cases, or otherwise indicate the problem, but I think it's nicer to have all the papers listed in the one place even if the author names are unknown.
  • Your file also was missing wikidata items where the author had no "series ordinal" number. Again just leave the name blank, and author number, that should be clear.
  • It might be good if you compare not just to the main name from ORCID, but to their alternate or first/last name breakdowns. I'm not sure quite what you did there but some of the "correct" cases were clearly matches when looking at ORCID alternate names listed in the UI.
  • There were a very small number of cases where the author sequence numbers you had were apparently different (often off by 1) from the actual author list in the paper, resulting in a mismatch on name when it was in fact ok. Not sure what happened here but one common issue was the handling of collective names - in Wikidata they seem to usually be in the regular author list just as they were on the paper, while they seemed to be skipped in the sequence you used.

Thanks for generating this file, I'm glad to have gone through it, I'm hoping we will have much less issues with mismatched ORCID's going forward!

Reply to "Finished "mismatched names with papers" file"
MediaWiki message delivery (talkcontribs)
Reply to "Wikidata weekly summary #643"

Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #169 is out: Limits on Name and Description Lengths

1
MediaWiki message delivery (talkcontribs)

There is a new update for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it!

In this issue, we discuss the introduction of more stringent limits on the length of object names, input names, and descriptions, and we take a look at the latest software developments.

Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check our archive! You might be interested in the launch of our "About" widget, a summary of our experience at Wikimania 2024, or the refinement of WasmEdge.

Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next Volunteers' Corner will be held on September 2, at 17:30 UTC (link to the meeting).

Enjoy the reading! -- User:Sannita (WMF) (talk) 08:04, 30 August 2024 (UTC)

Reply to "Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #169 is out: Limits on Name and Description Lengths"
MediaWiki message delivery (talkcontribs)
Reply to "Wikidata weekly summary #641"
MediaWiki message delivery (talkcontribs)
Reply to "Wikidata weekly summary #641"
MediaWiki message delivery (talkcontribs)
Reply to "Wikidata weekly summary #640"
MediaWiki message delivery (talkcontribs)
Reply to "Wikidata weekly summary #639"
MediaWiki message delivery (talkcontribs)
Reply to "Wikidata weekly summary #638"