Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zorba (trance group)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sr13 07:57, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Zorba (trance group) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Not clear that there exists reliable third-party coverage to build an article on. What is clear is that the creator of the page works for (or is) the band's promoter which raises serious concerns of conflict of interest. Pascal.Tesson 06:36, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm ambivalent. If WP:RS can be added, keep. Otherwise, delete AND delete their other group, G.M.S.. Precious Roy 06:12, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Evil Spartan 15:18, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 13:18, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sr13 17:30, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - After a detailed search, I could not find any WP:RS's to add to the article, not even upcoming appearance press releases. There does not seem to be reliable third-party coverage to build an article on. I have serious concerns of conflict of interest. Everyone who wanted to participate in this AfD already has. Closing this AfD with Delete would be supported by consensus. -- Jreferee (Talk) 19:38, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The most notable mention I could find was this source (and a MySpace link). But there has to be multiple, reputable sources so this still doesn't make the cut. Spellcast 20:02, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.