Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Where You Get Them At?

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 01:52, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Where You Get Them At?

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete Prod tag removed. Track from an album that does not even have a final tracklisting released. Not an announced single. No other sources. Fails WP:NSONGS. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 16:15, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete One song, that isn't even single, doesn't need its own article if it doesn't include any more info than a basic intro, and few more details, like its lenght. And no sources at all. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 16:26, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete ~~and redirect~~ ~~to The DeAndre Way~~ per WP:NALBUM. There is no sufficient material for a standalone article~~, but it is a valid search term~~. Armbrust ^Talk _Contribs 19:00, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:50, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no source that the track exists or that it is a track on the album. Red Flag on the Right Side 00:54, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No sources, fails notability for songs. No indication that it is a track on any album. The Thing // Talk // Contribs 16:31, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Joaquin008 ^(talk) 09:47, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.