Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tyler Randell

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:36, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tyler Randell

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NHOCKEY. If he ever plays in the NHL, enough games in the NHL or otherwise meets the notability criteria an article can be created at that point. But for the time being he is not notable. T.C.Haliburton^{talk nerdy to me} 05:07, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 13:22, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 13:22, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:06, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:07, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Michig (talk) 07:46, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:NHOCKEY and the routine sports coverage he has isn't enough to meet WP:GNG. Jakejr (talk) 03:18, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:28, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:NHOCKEY and by the looks of it WP:GNG from what I can find. Can be recreated when/if he does eventually meet notability requirements. -DJSasso (talk) 19:48, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.