Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Traci Kochendorfer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 04:33, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Traci Kochendorfer

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am unable to find independent reliable sources on this person. Most of the cited sources are either not independent or not reliable; for example, the 2013 Best Actress poll entry was clearly added by a fan. The interview at Bodybuilderfemales.com, which is listed as a source and used as a footnote, gives a different last name from the article (perhaps explainable) but also gives a different birth year, which makes me suspicious it's about the same person. I am unable to access the best source cited, the Fayetteville Observer article, or to find anything else to demonstrate notability, including documentation of the titles won. Yngvadottir (talk) 20:35, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:03, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:03, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:03, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:04, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. There is little in the article that is verifiable or about her that is notable, as nominator notes. Ground Zero | t 22:10, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – per nominator's concerns about notability and quality of sources. The BodybuilderFemales.com "interview", if it is the same person, in any case appears to be self-published. Note the "Add Your Profile!" link. – Wdchk (talk) 02:56, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Yes, I'm not implying it's a reliable source to demonstrate notability, but a (possibly self-published) interview in which both the person's last name and their date of birth are different from the article makes me wonder what in the article is accurate. Yngvadottir (talk) 16:07, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Bad quality of sources. Not notable. Note: article WP:OWNer has been blocked for 24 hours for vandalizing this AfD entry. jni ^(delete)_{...just not interested} 06:15, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.