Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Bomb Bassets

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. —Tom Morris (talk) 17:22, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Bomb Bassets

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced since created in 2006, article is about a non-notable band. Google search brings up nothing except blogs, YouTube etc and Amazon attempt to sell album. Discogs (how reliable is that?) says one album was recorded in 1997. I can find no independent coverage to suggest notability. BBC Music has nothing. It may be that associated pages should also be included, i.e. Sweet Baby, John Denery (a member of this band but also of four others that lack Wikipedia coverage) etc. Emeraude (talk) 11:45, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:24, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep They have a small write-up at allmusic [1], usually an indicator of notability. But the only other coverage i could find was a Phoenix New Times review of a split single [2], and the website of the free weekly Metroactive [3] calling their contribution to a compilation a stand-out. These are from '97 & '98 respectively, not a great time for finding online sourcing. (Discogs is fairly reliable loosely-speaking, but relies on user-submitted data and so not a WP:RS). 86.44.49.108 (talk) 03:42, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 15:27, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

~~Keep~~ - A short-lived Lookout! Records supergroup, including members of Sweet Baby and MTX. Esoteric, but this piece is factually accurate. Keep under IAR, use common sense to improve the encyclopedia. Carrite (talk) 18:44, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Upon further review: redirect to Dr. Frank. Carrite (talk) 18:47, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep if improved. By virtue of being signed to a relatively successful label and containing members of other notable bands, this is notable. However, the article, such as it is, is awful, with no expansion on details or success. Special K(KoЯn flakes) 22:29, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SarahStierch (talk) 17:35, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 00:05, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.