Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sajad Raad

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Doesn't seem to be consensus that current sourcing is anything other than routine Fenix down (talk) 19:33, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sajad Raad (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Footballer fails WP:GNG & WP:NFOOTY. WP:PROD removed by creator. OuvreLeChien (talk) 16:45, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:49, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:49, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iraq-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:49, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 17:33, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, buidhe 00:06, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The references in the article are quite routine - but there seems to be no end of media coverage of him, especially about his possible trade to a Jordanian team in the last few weeks search. How do some of these not meet GNG? Nfitz (talk) 03:11, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
No thoughts from anyone? I added a Jordanian source to the article. Players who aren't notable don't get foreign coverage. Nfitz (talk) 05:24, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.