Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Eggplant

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Keeping -

On a related note (this has nothing to do with my closure, however) - one of my first punk rock tapes was a Blatz tape. Missvain (talk) 20:53, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Eggplant

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable subject, no reliable secondary sources. Mansheimer (talk) 15:12, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:23, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:23, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:23, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not enough sourcing to show notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:56, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Barkeep49 (talk) 17:11, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Guitarist for Blatz, also known as Robert Burnett. He published and edited the very influential zine Absolutely Zippo. Rolling Stone calls him a pivotal figure. He was featured in the documentary Turn It Around: The Story of East Bay Punk. Also there is significant coverage of him in several books and journal articles about the punk scene.[1][2][3][4][5][6] Also, this is one of a series of sometimes questionable deletion nominations by a seemingly aggrieved editor. gobonobo ⁺ ^c 06:12, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per the multiple reliable sources coverage identified in this discussion including reliable books and journals so that WP:GNG is passed and deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 00:01, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I second (or third) based on Gobonobo's solid research seen above.--Concertmusic (talk) 20:08, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.