Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rhymes (song)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain (talk) 05:40, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rhymes (song)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Very new song, not in NPOV and written like advertisement. No doubt producers are notable, but the new released song do not credibly indicates any good coverage. Fails WP:NSONG A.Minkowiski^{_Lets t@lk} 16:48, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:30, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:30, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - non notable In ictu oculi (talk) 12:57, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This is a bona fide hit. Currently #13 in the UK 86.129.119.11 (talk) 19:00, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A "hit" still requires significant coverage in reliable sources. Being on a list of popular songs isn't "significant coverage". At best, per WP:NSONGS, a redirect is in order. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 19:46, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:56, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 02:33, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - This is basically a remixed version of Touch It, Although this is getting airplay it's no different from any other remixed version!, Not even worth Merging as it's not a cover either. –Davey2010^Talk 03:32, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.