Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peril (band)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. MBisanz ^talk 21:43, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Peril (band)

This stub has been around for three years. I couldn't find any reliable sources. It fails WP:MUSIC notability criteria. Axl ¤ [Talk] 12:22, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Might qualify under criteria 6 of WP:MUSIC as many of the members are notable and went on to form or be involved with notable groups. --neon white talk 13:12, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Criteria 6 specifically suggests redirects for bands that themselves are not notable. Make mine Delete. RGTraynor 14:44, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, per WP:MUSIC criterion 6. I agree that redirects make sense for otherwise non-notable bands with a notable member, but in this case there are three otherwise notable members, and if nothing else this page serves a reasonable function in connecting those three. ~ mazca ^{t | c} 17:30, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:40, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. —···日本穣^{? · Talk to Nihonjoe} 18:34, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I concur with Mazca's reasoning. If there's no one place to redirect, that's a sign that it shouldn't be redirected. I note that per official policy, being a stub -- even a permastub -- is not a wikicrime. —Quasirandom (talk) 14:39, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ···日本穣^{? · Talk to Nihonjoe} 06:38, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - sometimes small stubs that can connect the dots (that have no other place to go) are incredibly valuable. Chaldor (talk) 07:57, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as the band has notable members. Tavix (talk) 15:52, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —WWGB (talk) 01:53, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, as pointed out above, meets WP:MUSIC by virtue of having a number of otherwise notable members. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 10:48, 6 October 2008 (UTC).[reply]
Keep: as above - also has released three albums on various labels & has performed in Australia and Japan. Dan arndt (talk) 06:02, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.