Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Osman Uyanık

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JForget 00:46, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Osman Uyanık

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced BLP since creation in Feb, PROD (and cleanup tags) removed without reason or explanation by the first and only post by an IP, nothing available from reliable online sources, only facebook, forums and blogs. I don't read Turkish, but the club he's apparently signed to has no mention of him on their website. I also doubt that he played for AS Roma from age 13 to 18, nor on loan to 1860 Munich at age 15, so a possible hoax, auto-biography or just a not-yet notable junior player. The-Pope (talk) 15:18, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:40, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:40, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - The Turkish Football Federation has no record of such a person, and I can't find any evidence of the 1860 Munich loan. Certainly appears to be a hoax, and at best is unverifiable. Jogurney (talk) 21:23, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 17:31, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:ATHLETE and WP:GNG. Giant Snowman 17:33, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, he fails WP:ATHLETE and WP:GNG. --Carioca (talk) 21:32, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:ATHLETE and WP:GNG. Argyle 4 Life^talk 07:57, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Would appear to be a hoax. Mattythewhite (talk) 17:11, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.