Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ogayslabe

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 00:44, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ogayslabe

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I moved this from the Wikipedia space to draft but it was moved back. Moved to article space by me subsequently.

Minor Somali sub-clan. Basically unsourced except for the agreement with the British and for the notable member. I removed two links the Wikiwand version of Warsangeli as they are copies of our article. Perhaps merge to one of the major clans. CambridgeBayWeather (solidly non-human), Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 21:07, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Ethnic groups and Somalia. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:48, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I have improved the article and I believe it is worth publishing on the main space. Oali24331 (talk) 08:04, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Harti, though this topic isn't currently mentioned there. Strictly speaking (WP:V; WP:LC etc.), I'm not sure there's any content to merge. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 20:14, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. & FWIW/FYI, I've not actively watched Category:Somali clans articles for a while now, but the lengthy subclan/lineage listing is a longstanding issue. See Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Somalia/Archive 1#Clan lineage (and that was 2009!). -- Gyrofrog (talk) 20:26, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - most of the article is unsourced so there isn't anything worth merging and there is no evidence whatsoever that this topic meets WP:GNG. It violates WP:NOR, a Wikipedia policy. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:21, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I think the article is worth publishing, since it is new information that is not existed, and readers are interested in it. Oali24331 (talk) 14:02, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 00:28, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DeletePer nominator DarkHorseMayhem (talk) 22:58, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.