Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matt Schepke
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:19, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
- Matt Schepke (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG Joeykai (talk) 03:59, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:NHOCKEY. Fails WP:N and WP:GNG.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 05:31, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 06:24, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 06:24, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 06:24, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 06:24, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Exemplo347 (talk) 07:43, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Exemplo347 (talk) 07:43, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SoWhy 07:23, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SoWhy 07:23, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. Fails GNG, all coverage is routine and stat-based (ex. [1]). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 07:26, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
- Delete: found a fair amount of WP:ROUTINE coverage, but nothing significant or non-local to indicate GNG passes. Yosemiter (talk) 20:49, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.