Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manjula Damith Siripala

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Star Mississippi 02:52, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Manjula Damith Siripala

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The sources do not demonstrate WP:GNG and I was unable to find any significant coverage in a Google search and got absolutely nothing from Google News and ProQuest. Source analysis to follow. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:54, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Rugby union, and Sri Lanka. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:54, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Source analysis Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:58, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Source	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
Source assessment table:
https://www.dailynews.lk/2021/05/04/sports/248238/nalandian-anuja-played-sri-lanka-distinction	Mentioned once	✘ No
http://archives.dailynews.lk/2001/pix/PrintPage.asp?REF=/2008/04/29/spo03.asp	Mentioned in passing twice	✘ No
https://atkinsonrugby.com.au/teams-atkinson-past-players.php	No info about him	✘ No
http://www.srilankarugby.lk/Articles/View/2563	Mentioned once	✘ No
https://www.sundaytimes.lk/001022/sportsm.html	Mentioned once in passing in reference to an U21 game	✘ No
https://www.stuff.co.nz/nelson-mail/news/75509690/sri-lanka-cricket-supporters-finally-get-reason-to-cheer-at-nelsons-saxton-oval	Mentioned only once	✘ No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:58, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete , fails the requirements of WP:NRUGBY. Dan arndt (talk) 01:18, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per nom. Fails WP:NRU and more importantly WP:GNG. No suitable WP:ATD either. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 17:52, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, Fails WP:GNG. Alex-h (talk) 17:14, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.