Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lizzie Massey
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:29, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Lizzie Massey (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
A7 Nonnotable - see talkpage, author username & the logs. Fails Wikipedia:MUSIC#Criteria_for_musicians_and_ensembles. Kwiki (talk) 07:06, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, article fails to establish notability per WP:MUSIC. Esradekan Gibb "Talk" 10:02, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep The article is badly written, but a basic Google search finds plenty of reliable indepth sources "Lizzie+Massey"+Glastonbury search about her to meet WP:GNG (also WP:MUSIC criterion 1). I'll attempt a rewrite. - Mgm|(talk) 13:08, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Why doesn't the stupid link work? - Mgm|(talk) 13:09, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- I'mperator 13:47, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Try this search. Drawn Some (talk) 23:46, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep If this article is to be kept, it needs objective sources and a rewrite from someone is not the subject or fan! Postcard Cathy (talk) 01:47, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom.--CyberGhostface (talk) 02:21, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. With no releases and only a few gigs and a battle of the bands under her belt, she's not notable. Fences and windows (talk) 04:32, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as failing WP:MUSIC. Only claim of notability appears to be predecated on her being part of a manufactured band which was only brought together for a one-off competition winners slot at Glastonbury - ergo no independent notability. Only press coverage is in the Daily Telegraph which was the paper that ran the competition so does not qualify as being an independent source and the local paper of another band member where the coverage of Lizzie is incedental. Nancy talk 09:03, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.