Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lars Hjorth

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fenix down (talk) 20:39, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lars Hjorth

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Disputed PROD: "managing director in Stabæk is enough, also over 100 matches meets GNG". Fails WP:NFOOTBALL as none of the over 100 matches were in a 'fully professional league'. The number of matches played is irrelevant to WP:GNG which is measured by sustained, non-routine coverage, of which there is little evidence. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 19:24, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:30, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:30, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:30, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:33, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails GNG and NFOOTBALL. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 21:34, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep From the sources I see, he just about scrapes by GNG in my opinion. Govvy (talk) 11:04, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - coverage looks too weak for me to say that WP:GNG is met. This is more than a passing mention but the rest of the stuff I found was routine match report coverage and brief mentions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:44, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.