Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kjiva

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I'm closing this early under WP:SNOW. The only keep recommendations are coming from single-purpose accounts, many of which are sockpuppets. The only recommendations coming from established Wikipedia editors, familiar with policy, are to delete the article. —C.Fred (talk) 20:00, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kjiva (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable rapper who fails WP:BAND. I could find no third-party coverage in reliable sources. TonyBallioni (talk) 17:25, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Samj39 (talkcontribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
  • Strong Keep: Richarddev (talk) 19:20, 4 September 2016 (UTC) Kjiva is also known as marathi rapper if search on google news as marathi rapper get result link here [2] Also he is creator of marathi rap he is legend rapper his bio meets inspire a lots youth[reply]
Keep I've reorganized the article, added a ton of content, and a number of references. Kjiva appears to be a quite well known and discussed Rapper, especially in aviation circles. I would say he easily meets notability standards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Richarddev (talkcontribs) 19:23, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Richarddev (talkcontribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
Nileshjambhulkar (talkcontribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
Junaid khan ale (talkcontribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 07:08, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 07:09, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Margosullivan (talkcontribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
More socks blocked and struck. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:02, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete a non-notable rapper with the article plagued with lots of non-reliable sources.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:45, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I generally stay away from assessing non-U.S. musician articles, but the massive amount of keeps (most of which have recently been exposed as WP:SOCKPUPPETRY) intrigued me, considering that the majority of the provided references are user generated. What am I missing? I'm not finding the non-trivial,independent, third party references others claim to. If they exist, someone provide them and I could change my vote. My only question mark is the source Zee News, of which I am unfamiliar. But in reading the links it appears the cited instances of coverage are basically examples of a news source simply printing/rephrasing a press release, which to my interpretation do not add up to significant coverage, especially since there are only two of them. ShelbyMarion (talk) 17:53, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per WP:MUSICBIO. For anyone in academia who claims they don't contribute because MediaWiki is hard to learn, I point you to the self-promoters that create articles like this. Obviously, it's not that hard. Chris Troutman (talk) 15:26, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep He ismarathi rapper not American rapper please note that point the article about marathi rapper in Zee News media india which satisfy WP:BAND notable rapper Rajjones12 (talk) 16:50, 6 September 2016 (UTC) Rajjones12 (talkcontribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.