Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Johnny Angel Wendell

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 03:09, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

Johnny Angel Wendell

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Johnny Angel Wendell (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find any evidence that this person meets the notability guidelines for music (being a local supporting act for notable bands really, really doesn't count). He's had no charting singles, does not seem to have been instrumental in innovations in his chosen form of music, and as far as I can tell has only received trivial coverage except in the most fringe of publications. The article has been largely edited by two single-purpose accounts, which probably explains its boosterism. The links to it are also very much trivial and show how difficult it was to connect his page to the rest of Wikipedia ... this really shouldn't be the case for punk rock singers from the US, a subject area/country of which we usually have great coverage. Graham87 13:27, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Bands and musicians, Music, Radio, and California. Skynxnex (talk) 13:58, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Enos733 (talk) 16:06, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.