Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jamey Eisenberg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:48, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jamey Eisenberg

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP of a journalist, which is sourced nowhere but his "our staff" profile on the website of his own employer and his own Twitter feed. A journalist does not get a Wikipedia article just because primary and directly affiliated sources verify that he exists; he gets an article when he's substantively the subject of enough coverage in independent sources to satisfy WP:GNG. But nothing like that has been shown here, and nothing like that is locatable on the Google either -- all I get is hits where he's the bylined author of the content, or hits where he's namechecked as a soundbite provider in an article about something else, but I'm not finding hits where he's the subject of the coverage. Delete, without prejudice against recreation in the future if real reliable source coverage, about him rather than just verifying his existence, can be located. Bearcat (talk) 05:03, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:34, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:34, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:34, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:34, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The profile from his employer is not enough to establish notability. Especially since it does not seem to be a profile at all, just a listing of all his articles.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:22, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SSTflyer 01:03, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as his information is not convincing for any applicable notability. SwisterTwister talk 06:21, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, no third-party sources seem to exist. Bishonen | talk 21:42, 6 April 2016 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.