Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jake Chasan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 09:38, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jake Chasan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A clearly self-promotional autobiography. Just scrapes through A7, but the claim to notability is WP:1E (one event). The sources either mainly repeat the same information and photos, or are not reliable. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 05:00, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Wrote it himself see username https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Jake_Chasan Legacypac (talk) 05:07, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 10:24, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 10:24, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 10:24, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: per above. Harry the Dog WOOF 10:25, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: as above - I have removed the vast number of spam-links from the page making it less of a blatant advert. - Arjayay (talk) 12:54, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Chasan is notable for 2 events: 1. House App Challenge Winner (2014) and 2. Congressional Award Recipient (2013); both of these are supported by references published by reliable news papers. The self promotion has been removed since the opening of this case. --Galileo1600 (talk) 17:13, 11 January 2015 (UTC)— Galileo1600 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Account blocked as a sock. Vote struck.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:45, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:23, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:23, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and salt: If for nothing more than the North Korean apotheosis style photo and equally 'glorious' prose. It's a thoroughly unsubtle vanity piece; basically one giant badge... It also appears that he's not particularly notable. Salt because, based on the logs, the community has wasted enough time on this individual. Bellerophon _{talk to me} 01:34, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – While becoming an Eagle Scout is a great personal achievment, it is not inherently notable because literally millions of American boys have earned the rank. Becoming an Oracle Certified Java Programmer is not notable, as that is the lowest level of certification in that particular language. Nothing else mentioned in the article rises to meeting WP:BIO, and none of the coverage provided rises beyond WP:ROUTINE, thus WP:GNG is also failed. I don't recommend SALTing unless the article is recreated. — Jkudlick ^tc_s 07:13, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.