Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evian Christ

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. czar 15:43, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Evian Christ

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Just a page with no reliable source, and no notability for a musician. Been listed with Template:use mdy dates since October 2016 and no response. DBrown SPS (talk) 12:39, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete hence the fact that this article fails WP:BASIC, WP:NOTABILITY and WP:MUSICBIO. No secondary source found to prove information nor notability. Christ is not notable on certain sites and not often credited for attention. 66.189.232.210 (talk) 04:44, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Secondary sources to "prove information" are available in the references section of the article. Perhaps you missed this? North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:30, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: the list of references includes a full-length profile in the Guardian and articles on the BBC and the Independent. All three are "reliable sources that are independent of the subject" and I'd argue that the three together represent "significant coverage", thus ensuring he meets WP:GNG.Lincolnite (talk) 08:50, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 20:05, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Keep – Part of the nomination and the delete !vote by the IP user is patently false (e.g. "Just a page with no reliable source", "No secondary source found to prove information..."), because at the time the article was nominated for deletion (diff), the page had sources from The Independent, BBC, The Guardian, Dazed, Fact and Pitchfork. The subject meets WP:MUSICBIO and WP:BASIC per a review of available sources in online searches. Some sources are interviews, but also include non-interview content about the subject written by the authors. Some source examples include, but are not limited to [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11]. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:22, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 05:14, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:08, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:08, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, meets WP:GNG and WP:NM, plenty of sources available (as shown above) discussing Christ and his music. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:02, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep References include dedicated articles from the Independent, BBC, Guardian. All reliable sources. Ergo, meets WP:N. Tapered (talk) 04:22, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.