Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evandro Costa

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 10:41, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Evandro Costa

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Most likely self-promotional biography, none of his occupations seem notable enough. The subject's nicknames, Mono and Ev, are the same as the author's username, ‎ElMonoEv3. Google searches give minimal and unreliable results[1][2][3][4][5] (there's a musician of the same name, but he is also non-notable).[6] The Portuguese Wikipedia has no results for the subject either.[7] The majority of the subject's mentions on Wikipedia pages come from an unsourced addition of the article in the Template:Animal rights by an IP from Rio de Janeiro, where the subject comes from; both the IP and ElMonoEv3 have edited many of the same articles and they're probably the same person.[8] I already nominated it for WP:PROD but after one day the author removed the tag. Edit: I just realized that minutes after removing the tag, the same user created the article in the Portuguese Wikipedia as well, but it was immediately nominated for speedy deletion there. Ojo del tigre (talk) 04:45, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 05:07, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 05:07, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This article has some information moved from the Portuguese Wikipedia where it too has been selected for speedy deletion. Chabota Kanguya (talk) 05:16, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I don't read Portuguese--so take that for what it's worth--but I don't need to to see that 5 of the provided references are blogs, one is a dead link, and the others look like promotional content from the radio station he works with. The nominator lays out a good case all around. Clearly a vanity page. ShelbyMarion (talk) 09:02, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I'm brazilian and affirm, it is self-promotional biography.Guilherme Burn (talk) 16:53, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.