Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dylan Klose

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 17:19, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dylan Klose

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is no evidence this person is notable and it has no reliable sources. Grahame (talk) 01:35, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 01:37, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 03:17, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 03:17, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, even speedily so, as a vanity article/work of fiction by a teenager having a bit of fun on Wikipedia. Bakazaka (talk) 03:22, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Bakazaka. Mccapra (talk) 07:23, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Klose it per Bakazaka. It's not even klose. Clarityfiend (talk) 09:56, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete and salt the ice: per G3. Let's not give this idiot any more ice time. Ravenswing 11:54, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per Ravenswing. Flapjacktastic (talk) 14:24, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Snowy delete Let's just end this now as per WP:SNOW. Jmertel23 (talk) 14:44, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete and SALT Per nom, this is not notable at all. Kb03 (talk) 16:09, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all above. Obvious self-bio (WP:NOTWEBHOST) and miserably fails WP:GNG and WP:BASIC. Totally unencyclopedic article content. Ejgreen77 (talk) 23:30, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete self-bio. I'd also like to point out the creator, User:Morbs14, literally admits this is him on his user page and claims to be a Duke. Wikiman5676 (talk) 06:10, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all of the above. Not totally a work of fiction, though obviously the content is exagerated and a self-bio, but it clearly fails WP:GNG and WP:BASIC. Even going deeper, it fails WP:NHOCKEY. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 06:14, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and Salt. Obvious CSD. Britishfinance (talk) 18:08, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and salt - not notable --DannyS712 (talk) 03:15, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.