Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DGAF
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Yamamoto Ichiro 会話 07:44, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable group fails WP:MUSIC. Promotional with no WP:RS coverage cited or found. TexasAndroid (talk) 12:21, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 12:29, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. (I prodded this for the reasons above.) The petition section is borderline WP:CSD#G11 spam. The rest of article is premature at best. Further searching since the prod found a Billboard link confirming a record due March 2008.[1] Very little else is independent of label and its associated acts. • Gene93k (talk) 14:09, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Yeah. I shamelessly cut&pasted your PROD reasoning to here. They were acurate about the situation, and summed up the problems better than I could have done myself. :) - TexasAndroid (talk) 14:17, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Too soon for this group to have an article here. Perhaps after their "rumored" tour—if verifiable references from reliable sources can be found—the article can be re-created. Fails WP:MUSIC as is. Precious Roy (talk) 12:54, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Nonnotable. ♫ Cricket02 (talk) 15:56, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.