Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Come on a Cone (song)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Clear consensus that the subject meets the relevant guidelines. TerriersFan (talk) 03:34, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Come on a Cone (song)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not convinced this passed WP:NMUSIC, there's no significant coverage. While a music video was released it doesn't appear to have got a massive amount of coverage. — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 17:41, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:06, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 21:14, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. It received enough coverage: Pitchfork: [1], MTV: [2], [3], Exclaim!: [4], SPIN: [5], Prefix: [6], FACT: [7], EW: [8], Digital Spy: [9]. Probably too much content for a merge to the album. --Michig (talk) 08:56, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spinning Spark 00:34, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The subject of an article does not need to "have got a massive amount of coverage" for it to meet WP:GNG, or even WP:NMUSIC. It's received substantial non-trivial coverage in reliable sources. BeyondKneesReach (talk) 00:51, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Article has received substantial non-trivial coverage in reliable sources. Meets WP:NMUSIC ^Alex J _Fox^(Talk)_(Contribs) 01:04, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Per exactly what AlexJFox and BeyondKneesReach stated. "substantial non-trivial coverage in reliable sources." It is notable per WP:NMUSIC. -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 01:08, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep Although I would like to have seen more depth of coverage and in major media outlets, the song and follow-up video released in Oct 2012 received lots of coverage in the hip-hop/rap niche. The links Michig provided above are non-trivial and reliable. DocTree (ʞlɐʇ·cont) Join WER 01:50, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.