Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Camille Bloom

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Keep, but please perform a cleanup now that you have identified a bunch of sources. Tone 20:48, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Camille Bloom

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional, unreferenced, and non-notable. Does not pass WP:MUSIC or WP:GNG, from what I can tell. The few references that I could find (1, 2) don't seem to qualify as significant coverage. --Bongwarrior (talk) 20:30, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:37, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:37, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:09, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for being unreferenced and promotional, created by a (mostly) SPA editor 8 years ago. The subject's website has a press kit page that sources perhaps 20 examples of coverage in sources of varying quality. I haven't taken the time to make a detailed assessment of each, but at a glance they seem to cull material from her own provided content. ShelbyMarion (talk) 14:19, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Like the nom, I've only found the two sources they link to. One is apparently a press release, and the second is an interview (both primary sources). This is leads me to also believe that it fails notability guidelines. Waggie (talk) 01:11, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The subject passes general notability guidelines. Sources include:

"Bloom wants her act to speak for itself" from the Spokesman-Review
"Camille Bloom may be the next great Seattle singer-songwriter" from The Seattle Times
"Indie Autumn" from The Independent-Record
"Life on the Edge" from The Independent-Record
"Music review: Camille Bloom puts pieces into package" from the Knox News
"Camille Bloom" from The Missoulian
"Enjoy a bouquet with Bloom" from the Albuquerque Journal
"Songwriter's career starting to bloom" from the Albuquerque Journal
"Bloom in ugly shirts" from The Spokesman-Review
"Home studio provides space to bloom" from The Spokesman-Review
"A life in pieces" from No Depression
"ALBUM REVIEW: Camille Bloom “Pieces of Me”" from Audio Femme
"Camille Bloom Is Ready to School You" from The Advocate
"Get A Piece Of Camille Bloom" from Curve
"Camille Bloom & The Recovery" from M Music & Musicians
"Teacher-turned-singer Camille Bloom will play Ventura Oct. 3" from Ventura County Star
"Camille Bloom brings her 'feisty' to Prescott" from The Daily Courier
"CAMILLE BLOOM WANTS TO GET INTIMATE WITH YOU (BUT NOT AT A WOMEN'S FESTIVAL)" from OC Weekly
"Stuff From the Shelf: ‘Never Out of Time’ by Camille Bloom and the Recovery" from the Daily Bruin
"Camille Bloom" from Paste

And the following sources help establish WP:BASIC:

"Bloom brings bite" from the Fort Collins Coloradoan
"Album Review: Camille Bloom, “Pieces of Me”" from Pop Dose
"Camille Bloom and the Recovery: Never Out of Time (self-released)" from Spike Magazine
"Full rock experience" from The Spokesman-Review
"Camille Bloom: Pieces of Me" from OutSmart
"Growing Songs" from the Albuquerque Journal
Camille Bloom from The Independent-Record
Camile Bloom concert from The Independent-Record
"Camille Bloom and The Recovery" from the Missoula Independent

And there are many more. I will drop these on the talk page. Missvain (talk) 19:31, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as per the many reliable sources identified above that shows a pass of WP:Basic and WP:NMUSIC criteria 1 (only one criteria needed). With this many sources it shouldn't be too hard to replace any promotional content with neutral prose, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 23:15, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, meets GNG. AfD is not for clean-up issues. Gleeanon409 (talk) 13:49, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, as it has many sources, but the article needs to be edited to include these additional references. Countrychick56 (talk) 00:30, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – The subject meets WP:BASIC as per a review of the sources provided by Missvain. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:27, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.