Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/C. Clements
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Closing due to early consensus. Missvain (talk) 23:47, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- C. Clements (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Crystal clear WP:GNG fail. WP:NCRIC gives an assumption to umpires oddly but ultimately requires WP:GNG to be met. SportingFlyer T·C 15:29, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. SportingFlyer T·C 15:29, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. SportingFlyer T·C 15:29, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. SportingFlyer T·C 15:29, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:31, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Kolma8 (talk) 18:39, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
- Delete absolute failure of the GNG; almost no information with which to try and discover further information, if any exists, which seems very unlikely. wjematherplease leave a message... 18:44, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
- Delete a non-notable cricket official.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:33, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
- Comment - Johnpacklambert, do you even read these articles before you jump in and just vote delete? The subject of the article wasn't a cricket player at all, he was an umpire. It would be helpful if you could participate more constructively in these discussions, rather than jump in and out. Deus et lex (talk) 12:42, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. Fails just about everything. RobinCarmody (talk) 23:25, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
- Delete - I don't think there's really a rationale for keeping or redirecting this one at all. Blue Square Thing (talk) 11:15, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Cbl62 (talk) 14:09, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
- Delete - in the same way that referees in football don't inherit notability from matches officiated, nor should cricket umpires. If the match itself were notable, this could be redirected but it isn't as far as I can see Spiderone 18:53, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.