Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bufus Dei

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete both. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:18, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bufus Dei

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Two albums by the same band, Bufus Dei and Ablun Malüss 108. Contested prods. I couldn't find reliable, independent sources giving significant attention to these albums, so they fail our notability guideline. 48 Distinct Google hits[1] for Ablun Malüss 108, 29 for Bufus Dei. No Google News archive or Google books hits for either. The articles are only sourced to myspace and facebook, so no help there either. Fram (talk) 08:56, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Portugal-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 15:06, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 15:06, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:24, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Article lacks significant coverage in reliable third party sources and fails the general notability guidelines. Alpha_Quadrant ^(talk) 04:13, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:GNG. Stuartyeates (talk) 07:41, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.