Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Britain's Got Talent (series 16)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎ . Extraordinary Writ (talk) 00:44, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Britain's Got Talent (series 16)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Britain's Got Talent (series 16)

This article, about a television series that may have started within the past 24 hours, has no references, and so should not have been created in article space. It may also be too soon with no results or very few results to report. There is also a draft, Draft: Britain's Got Talent (series 16), by a different editor, which was briefly in article space and was then (correctly) moved into draft space. Either references and substantive content should be added to this article within seven days for a Heymann result, or it should be merged with the existing draft and the merged draft left in draft space until there are substantive results with reliable sources. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:02, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and United Kingdom. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:02, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sources need to be added as far as judging changes, but it has started airing; it's not getting deleted at this point. Nate • (chatter) 00:20, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Obviously. One of the biggest shows in the UK. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:59, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. It is silly to delete this article when it would just need to be created again within weeks, as every season of the show gets sufficient coverage to cross the threshold of notability. Beyond that, there are already nearly a dozen sources in the article, some high-level, providing reasonable coverage of the subject. BD2412 T 00:31, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep the show and this season pass WP:GNG. The draft issue is another thing, but the article as it is now has several sources now, and yes definitely could still be improved, but I don't feel deletion or drafty is the best course forward with the season already started. WikiVirusC^(talk) 19:39, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep every season has one lmaoMuur (talk) 02:15, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Article could still be improved, but seems fine for now. Absolutely no point in deleting. CycloneYoris ^talk! 10:55, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.