Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ben Morris (rugby league)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Kurykh (talk) 01:04, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ben Morris (rugby league) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD removed with rationale: "Needs cleanup, not deletion. Additional content likely can be found", which is flawed as the player still fails WP:RLN. – skemcraig 19:15, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Moved to keep Skemcraig (talk) 21:05, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:44, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wales-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:44, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Fleets. Appearing on a national team at an international competition is notable. South Nashua (talk) 05:58, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - although he is yet to make an appearance in the Super League, he has indeed signed with a team that plays in the top tier of competition for rugby league in Europe. The signing seems to have been done fairly recently and he might make his debut soon enough. Add the fact that he has played an international match and scored two vital tries, be it at the qualifying stage, the person seems notable enough in my understanding. Though he does not precisely meet WP:RLN yet, it appears that he very soon might. I would like to give the article some time. It can always be nominated for deletion again if he does not play any more matches, which seems highly unlikely to me. — Yash talk stalk 18:52, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy keep – changing my !vote from delete as nom to speedy keep per the new information that has come to light during this Afd. Skemcraig (talk) 21:05, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.