Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anoop Sharma Pem

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 08:28, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Anoop Sharma Pem

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Footballer who fails GNG and most likely NFOOTY as well, if he even exist. The only mention of him comes from this article: [1] which is very dubious. His supposedly debut international match against Algeria in 2007 or 2008 didn't seem to happen at all. BlameRuiner (talk) 09:52, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 10:09, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 10:10, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mauritius-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 10:10, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 10:12, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - looks like a hoax. According to RSSSF, Mauritius not only didn't play Algeria on that day, they have in fact never played them! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:47, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and Chris - since the 'match report' is a work of fiction, this automatically casts doubt on the rest of the article. I can find nothing more than Transfermarkt and Wikipedia mirrors on this guy and Transfermarkt is widely considered to be unreliable by editors here Spiderone 12:02, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as likely hoax, based on the above. Giant Snowman 12:23, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as a hoax. Number 5 7 10:23, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.