Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ademola Kuti

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fenix down (talk) 08:19, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ademola Kuti

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not pass either WP:GNG nor WP:NFOOTY. Nehme₁₄₉₉ (talk) 21:24, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 21:29, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 21:29, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 21:29, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:33, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails GNG and NFOOTBALL; claims he played numerous first-team games not supported by this. Giant Snowman 11:24, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I would even go on to say that it's a hoax page. Two sources are Transfermarkt (unreliable), and I have the impression that the other two are fake websites, used with the intent to "mask" deceitful articles. Notice how both use exactly the same (low-res) image of Maradona... a coincidence? Also, Soccerway's individual pages for the four teams in the infobox don't show the player there (e.g. Fujairah in 2018/19). Nehme₁₄₉₉ (talk) 14:56, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a non-notable footballer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:29, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - unverifiable article which is a likely hoax. Jogurney (talk) 17:18, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.